The Impact of Pre-Operative Malperfusion on Outcome in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Results From the GERAADA Registry

Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality in Type A Acute Aortic Syndrome: Data From the RENADA-RO Registry

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyse the baseline characteristics of patients admitted with acute type A aortic syndrome (ATAAS) and to identify the potential predictors of in-hospital mortality in surgically managed patients.

METHODS

Data regarding demographics, clinical presentation, laboratory work-up, and management of 501 patients with ATAAS enrolled in the National Registry of Aortic Dissections-Romania registry from January 2011 to December 2022 were evaluated. The primary endpoint was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to identify independent predictors of mortality in patients with acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) who underwent surgery.

RESULTS

The mean age was 60±11 years and 65% were male. Computed tomography was the first-line diagnostic tool (79%), followed by transoesophageal echocardiography (21%). Cardiac surgery was performed in 88% of the patients. The overall mortality in the entire cohort was 37.9%, while surgically managed ATAAD patients had an in-hospital mortality rate of 29%. In multivariate logistic regression, creatinine value (OR 6.76), ST depression on ECG (OR 6.3), preoperative malperfusion (OR 5.77), cardiogenic shock (OR 5.77), abdominal pain (OR 4.27), age ≥70 years (OR 3.76), and syncope (OR 3.43) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality in surgically managed ATAAD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk stratification based on the variables collected at admission may help to identify ATAAS patients with high risk of death following cardiac surgery.

Incidence Rates of Penn Classes and Class-Specific Mortality in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Patients: An Epidemiologic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a life-threatening emergency that is associated with a high morbidity and mortality rate. One of the complications is end-organ ischemia, a known predictor of mortality. The primary aims of this meta-analysis were to summarize the findings of observational studies investigating the utility of the Penn classification system and to analyze the incidence rates and mortality patterns within each class. The electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase were searched through to April 2023. These were filtered by multiple reviewers to give 10 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The extracted data included patient characteristics, and primary outcomes were the incidence rates of different Penn classes, along with the corresponding mortality for each class. Out of 1,512 studies identified during the initial search, 10 studies, including 4,494 patients, met the inclusion criteria. The pooled incidence of Penn A was highest at 0.55 (95% CI 0.52, 0.58), followed by Penn B at 0.21 (95% CI 0.17, 0.25), and finally Penn C at 0.14 (95% CI 0.11, 0.17). Patients with Penn BC were found to be at the highest risk of death, as their early mortality rates were 0.36 (95% CI 0.31, 0.41). Within those populations, the subtype with the highest individual mortality was Penn C at 0.21 (95% CI 0.15, 0.27), followed by Penn B at 0.19 (95% CI 0.15, 0.23) and Penn A at 0.07 (95% CI 0.05, 0.10). Among patients presenting with ATAAD, class A was most frequently observed, followed by classes B, C, and BC. These findings indicate an incremental increase in mortality rates with the progression of Penn classification.

Right axillary artery cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection with involvement of the right axillary artery

OBJECTIVE

The right axillary artery is currently recommended for arterial cannulation in surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. However, the feasibility of cannulation on a dissected right axillary artery remains undetermined. The objective was to examine the feasibility of cannulation on a dissected right axillary artery.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2020, 835 patients who underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair were included in this study. Cannulation strategy and perioperative outcomes of patients who did and did not have right axillary artery dissection were compared. Propensity score matching and logistic regression were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 124 patients had right axillary artery dissection, and 711 patients did not. Direct right axillary artery cannulation was used for cardiopulmonary bypass in the majority of patients, but with a lower rate in patients with right axillary artery dissection (n = 88 [71.0%] vs n = 579 [81.4%], P = .007). Right axillary artery cannulation failure (n = 3 [2.4%] vs n = 5 [0.7%], P = .102) and related complications (n = 1 [0.8%] vs n = 6 [0.8%], P = 1.000) were rare in both groups. In-hospital mortality (n = 18 [14.5%] vs n = 59 [8.3%], P = .027) and stroke (n = 14 [11.3%] vs n = 42 [5.9%], P = .027) were significantly higher in the right axillary artery dissection group, but after propensity score matching, in-hospital outcomes were comparable. Right axillary artery dissection was not a risk factor for mortality, stroke, right axillary artery cannulation not performed, or right axillary artery cannulation failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct right axillary artery cannulation is feasible for most patients with acute type A aortic dissection with right axillary artery dissection.

Survival after operative repair of acute type A aortic dissection varies according to the presence and type of preoperative malperfusion

OBJECTIVE

Approximately one-quarter of patients with acute type A aortic dissection (TAAD) present with concomitant malperfusion of coronary arteries, mesenteric circulation, lower extremities, kidneys, brain, and/or coma. It is generally accepted that TAAD patients who present with malperfusion experience higher mortality rates than patients without, although how specific malperfusion syndromes, alone or in combination, affect mortality is not well described.

METHODS

The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection database was queried for patients who underwent surgical repair of TAAD. Patients were stratified according to the presence/absence of malperfusion at presentation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate in-hospital mortality according to malperfusion type. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to estimate 30-day postoperative survival.

RESULTS

Six thousand four hundred thirty-seven patients underwent surgical repair of acute TAAD, of whom 2642 (41%) had 1 or more preoperative malperfusion syndromes. Mesenteric malperfusion (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.84; P < .001) was associated with the highest odds of in-hospital mortality, followed by coma (AOR, 1.88; P = .007), limb ischemia (AOR, 1.73; P = .008), and coronary malperfusion (AOR, 1.51; P = .02). Renal malperfusion (AOR, 1.37; P = .24) and neurologic deficit (AOR, 1.35; P = .28) were not associated with increased in-hospital mortality. In patients who survived to discharge, there was no difference in 1-year postdischarge survival in the malperfusion and no malperfusion cohorts (P = .36).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival during the index admission after TAAD repair varies according to the presence and type of malperfusion syndromes, with mesenteric malperfusion being associated with the highest odds of in-hospital death. Not only the presence of malperfusion but rather specific malperfusion syndromes should be considered when assessing a patient's risk of undergoing TAAD repair.

Frozen elephant use in type a dissection: fundamentals, innovations, and pitfalls

INTRODUCTION

Type A acute aortic dissection (TA-AAD) is a great challenge for aortic surgeons. The establishment of a standardized surgical approach, particularly the determination of whether and when to address the aortic arch and the distal aorta in the same operation as the proximal aorta, is still unclear.

AREAS COVERED

Frozen elephant trunk (FET) has emerged as a valuable treatment for TA-AAD over the last decade. Here, we discuss the fundamentals and pitfalls of frozen elephant trunk procedures and present the latest innovations.

EXPERT OPINION

FET has the potential to simplify arch reconstruction in patients with complex arch tears and rupture, optimize perfusion in the distal true lumen for those with a compressed true lumen and malperfusion, address distal reentry tears, and promote false lumen thrombosis and late aortic remodeling. Nevertheless, FET is still associated with non-negligible mortality and morbidity rates. Patient selection, surgical expertise, and postoperative care remain crucial determinants in ensuring successful outcomes. Recent innovations in FET surgery involve the development of techniques to minimize or avoid hypothermic circulatory arrest and new FET devices with different arch branch configurations aiming to facilitate subsequent aortic reinterventions. We believe that both these advancements have the potential to improve patient outcomes.

Surgical choice for the treatment of partial intestinal ischemic necrosis caused by acute type a aortic dissection combined with malperfusion of superior mesenteric artery

Acute type A aortic dissection is a severe cardiovascular disease characterized by rapid onset and high mortality. Traditionally, urgent open aortic repair is performed after admission to prevent aortic rupture and death. However, when combined with malperfusion syndrome, the low perfusion of the superior mesenteric artery can further lead to intestinal necrosis, significantly impacting the surgery's prognosis and potentially resulting in adverse consequences, bringing. This presents great significant challenges in treatment. Based on recent domestic and international research literature, this paper reviews the mechanism, current treatment approaches, and selection of surgical methods for poor organ perfusion caused by acute type A aortic dissection. The literature review findings suggest that central aortic repair can be employed for the treatment of acute type A aortic dissection with inadequate perfusion of the superior mesenteric artery. The superior mesenteric artery can be windowed and (/or) stented, followed by delayed aortic repair. Priority should be given to revascularization of the superior mesenteric artery, followed by central aortic repair. During central aortic repair, direct blood perfusion should be performed on the distal true lumen of the superior mesenteric artery, leading to resulting in favorable therapeutic outcomes. The research results indicate that even after surgical aortic repair, intestinal ischemic necrosis may still occur. In such cases, prompt laparotomy and necessary necrotic bowel resection are crucial for saving the patient's life.

Two surgical strategies (early carotid reperfusion vs. Central aortic repair-first) of acute type a aortic dissection complicated with cerebral malperfusion syndrome: a meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Cerebral malperfusion (CM) is a common comorbidity in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD), which is associated with high mortality and poor neurological prognosis. This meta-analysis investigated the surgical strategy of ATAAD patients with CM, aiming to compare the difference in therapeutic effectiveness between the central repair-first and the early reperfusion-first according to clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The meta-analysis and systematic review was conducted based on studies sourced from the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane literature database, in which cases of ATAAD with CM underwent surgical repair were included. Data for baseline characteristics, mortality, survival were extracted, and risk ratio (RR) values and the pooled mortality were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 17 retrospective studies were analyzed, including 1010 cases of ATAAD with CM underwent surgical repair. The pooled early mortality in early reperfusion group was lower (8.1%; CI, 0.02 to 0.168) than that in the central repair group (16.2%; CI, 0.115 to 0.216). The pooled long-term mortality was 7.9% in the early reperfusion cohort and 17.4% the central repair-first cohort, without a statistically significant heterogeneity (I [2] = 51.271%; p = 0.056). The mean time of symptom-onset-to-the-operation-room in all the reports was 8.87 ± 12.3 h.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggested that early reperfusion-first may achieved better outcomes compared to central repair-first in ATAAD patients complicated with CM to some extent. Early operation and early restoration of cerebral perfusion may reduce the occurrence of some neurological complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (No. CRD CRD42023475629) on Nov. 8th, 2023.

Endovascular Recanalization and Carotid Stenting: The New Approach to Restore Cerebral Perfusion during Aortic Dissection

A type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a dangerous condition requiring emergency surgery. Due to the similarity of the symptoms of cerebral malperfusion in TAAD and the signs of ischemic stroke, a differential diagnosis of these diseases is not always available. Patients with TAAD after cerebral malperfusion can have a neurological deficit. Thrombolysis is performed in this case. It can worsen the patient's condition and increase the risk of mortality and disability. The aim of the study is to evaluate the new approach to restoring cerebral perfusion during aortic dissection. This approach includes endovascular recanalization and carotid stenting.

METHODS

Two clinical cases of TAAD complicated by cerebral malperfusion are described. The first patient is 73 years old and was admitted as planned to perform transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for grade III aortic stenosis. The patient underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on the second day after admission. The second patient is 60 years old and was hospitalized by an ambulance with strong hypertension and ischemia. The surgical correction of aortic dissection was postponed until the neurological status assessment in both patients.

RESULTS

The surgery to correct the aorta dissection was deemed inappropriate. The carotid arteries have been reanalyzed, and cerebral perfusion has been restored in a short time in both patients.

CONCLUSION

Acute bilateral internal carotid occlusion is a potentially fatal TAAD outcome. Emergency endovascular recanalization and carotid stenting may be considered one of the few ways to restore cerebral perfusion.

Development and validation of LCMM prediction algorithms to estimate recovery pattern of postoperative AKI in type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study

Background

Postoperative acute kidney injury (PO-AKI) is a prevalent complication among patients with acute type A aortic dissection (aTAAD) for which unrecognized trajectories of renal function recovery, and their heterogeneity, may underpin poor success in identifying effective therapies.

Methods

This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study in a regional Great Vessel Center including patients undergoing aortic dissection surgery. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) recovery trajectories of PO-AKI were defined through the unsupervised latent class mixture modeling (LCMM), with an assessment of patient and procedural characteristics, complications, and early-term survival. Internal validation was performed by resampling.

Results

A total of 1,295 aTAAD patients underwent surgery and 645 (49.8%) developed PO-AKI. Among the PO-AKI cohort, the LCMM identified two distinct eGFR trajectories: early recovery (ER-AKI, 51.8% of patients) and late or no recovery (LNR-AKI, 48.2% of patients). Binary logistic regression identified five critical determinants regarding poor renal recovery, including chronic kidney disease (CKD) history, renal hypoperfusion, circulation arrest time, intraoperative urine, and myoglobin. LNR-AKI was associated with increased mortality, continuous renal replacement therapies, mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and hospital stay. The assessment of the predictive model was good, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.76), sensitivity of 61.74%, and specificity of 75.15%. The internal validation derived a consistent average AUC of 0.73. The nomogram was constructed for clinicians' convenience.

Conclusion

Our study explored the PO-AKI recovery patterns among surgical aTAAD patients and identified critical determinants that help to predict individuals at risk of poor recovery of renal function.

FL% is associated with the severity of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection in patients undergoing frozen elephant trunk and total arch replacement

Objectives

The diameter, area, and volume of the true lumen and false lumen (FL) have been measured in previous studies to evaluate the extent of DeBakey type I aortic dissection. However, these indicators have limitations because of the irregular shapes of the true and false lumens and the constant oscillation of intimal flap during systole and diastole. The ratio of arch lengths seems to be a more reliable indicator. FL% was defined as the ratio of the arch length of FL to the circumference of the aorta at the different levels of the aorta. The purpose of this article was to investigate whether FL% is a predictor of the severity of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection in patients undergoing frozen elephant trunk (FET) and total arch replacement.

Methods

In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed a total of 344 patients with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection that underwent FET and total arch replacement at our center from October 2015 to October 2019. The patients were divided into two groups by cluster analysis according to the perioperative course. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine whether FL% could predict the severity of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to assess the power of the multivariate logistic regression model for the severity of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection.

Results

The patients in the ultra-high-risk group (109 patients) had significantly more severe clinical comorbidities and complications than the patients in the high-risk group (235 patients). The ascending aortic FL% [odds ratio (OR), 11.929 (95% CI: 1.421-100.11); P = 0.022], location of initial tear [OR, 0.68 (95% CI: 0.47-0.98); P = 0.041], the degree of left iliac artery involvement [OR, 1.95 (95% CI: 1.15-3.30); P = 0.013], and the degree of right coronary artery involvement [OR, 1.46 (95% CI: 1.01-2.12); P = 0.045] on preoperative computed tomography angiography were associated with the severity of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection. The AUROC value of this multivariate logistic regression analysis was 0.940 (95% CI: 0.914-0.967; P < 0.001). The AUROC value of ascending aortic FL% was 0.841 (95% CI: 0.798-0.884; P < 0.001) for the severity of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection in patients undergoing FET and total arch replacement.

Conclusions

Ascending aortic FL% was validated as an essential radiologic index for assessing the severity of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection in patients undergoing FET and total arch replacement. Higher values of ascending aortic FL% were more severe.

Stroke After Acute Type A Dissection Repair Using Right Axillary Cannulation First Approach

BACKGROUND

This study sought to analyze the details of strokes after acute type A dissection repair (ATAD) using a right axillary artery (RAX) first approach.

METHODS

A total of 356 consecutive ATAD repairs from 2005 to 2022 were analyzed on the basis of arterial cannulation site. Strokes were evaluated by head computed tomography.

RESULTS

The rate of RAX cannulation was 82.6% (n = 294), with a 38.2% rate of antegrade cerebral perfusion use, both of which had increased over the years. The non-RAX group had more cardiogenic shock (RAX, 16.3% vs non-RAX, 37.1%; P < .001), cerebral malperfusion (8.8% vs 25.8%, respectively; P < .001), and innominate artery dissection (45.9% vs 69.2%, respectively; P = .007). Eight patients died before undergoing a full neurologic assessment. The overall stroke rate was 8.4% (n = 30), and it was lower in the RAX group (5.1% vs 24.2%; P < .001). All strokes were ischemic, with concomitant hemorrhagic strokes occurring in 6 patients. Strokes diagnosed immediately after surgery (perioperative stroke) accounted for 70% (n = 21 of 30) of cases. Strokes predominantly affected the right anterior circulation (right anterior, 80% vs left anterior, 46.7% vs left posterior, 26.7%; P = .013), independent of arterial cannulation site. The proposed mechanism of perioperative strokes was not uniform (embolism, 33.3%; hypoperfusion, 42.8%; embolism and hypoperfusion, 14.3%; lacunar infarct, 10%), whereas most postoperative strokes were embolic (77.8%). The mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 20.6 ± 9.9, and the modified Rankin score at discharge was 4.1±2.2.

CONCLUSIONS

Most strokes in ATAD occurred perioperatively from various mechanisms predominantly affecting the right anterior circulation irrespective of the arterial cannulation site. This complication is most likely the result of unstable hemodynamics and dissection of the innominate artery (IA) or its downstream vessels.

Risk factors for long-term mortality after acute aortic dissection-results of the German registry for acute aortic dissection type a long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES

Several short-term analyses from German Registry for Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) have been published. This study investigated whether short-term risk factors are transferable to the long-term prognosis of patients.

METHODS

Thirty-three centres with 2686 patients participated in the long-term follow-up. A total of 1164 patients died, 1063 survived and 459 were lost to follow-up during the follow-up timeframe (mean duration: 10.2 years). Long-term mortality of the cohort was compared with an age-stratified, German population.

RESULTS

One, 5 and 10 years after initial surgery, the survival of the GERAADA patient cohort was 71.4%, 63.4% and 51%, respectively. Without the early deaths (90-day mortality 25.4%), survival was calculated after 1, 5 and 10 years: 95.6%, 83.5% and 68.3%. Higher age, longer extracorporeal circulation time, shorter perioperative ventilation time and postoperative neurologic deficits were predictive of long-term prognosis. In an age-divided landmark analysis, the mortality of aortic dissection surgery survivors was found to be similar to that of the general German population. If patients are sorted in risk groups according to the GERAADA score, long-term survival differs between the risk groups.

CONCLUSIONS

If patients have survived an acute postoperative period of 90 days, life expectancy comparable to that of the general German population can be assumed in lower- and medium-risk patients. Whether the GERAADA score can provide valuable insights into the long-term prognosis of patients undergoing surgery for acute aortic dissection type A is still unclear.

Hemiarch versus extended arch repair for acute type A dissection: Results from a multicenter national registry

OBJECTIVE

We compared perioperative outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection undergoing hemiarch (HA) versus extended arch (EA) repair with or without descending aortic intervention.

METHODS

Nine hundred twenty-nine patients underwent acute type A aortic dissection repair (2002-2021, 9 centers) including open distal repair (HA) with or without additional EA repair. EA with intervention on the descending aorta (EAD) included elephant trunk, antegrade thoracic endovascular aortic replacement, or uncovered dissection stent. EA with no descending intervention (EAND), included unstented suture-only methods. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, permanent neurologic deficit, computed tomography malperfusion resolution, and a composite. Multivariable logistic regression was also performed.

RESULTS

Mean age was 66 ± 18 years, 30% (278 out of 929) were women, and HA was performed more frequently (75% [n = 695]) than EA (25% [n = 234]). EAD techniques included: dissection stent (39 out of 234 [17%]), thoracic endovascular aortic replacement (18 out of 234 [7.7%]), and elephant trunk (87 out of 234 [37%]). In-hospital mortality (EA: n = 49 [21%] and HA: n = 129 [19%]; P = .42), and neurological deficit (EA: n = 43 [18%] and HA: n = 121 [17%]; P = .74) were similar. EA was not independently associated with death (EA vs HA odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.77-1.54; P = .63) or neurologic deficit (EA vs HA odds ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.47-1.55; P = .59). Composite adverse events differed significantly (EA vs HA odds ratio, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.16-1.87; P = .001). Malperfusion resolved more frequently after EAD (EAD: n = 32 [80%], EAND: n = 18 [56%], HA: n = 71 [50%]; P = .004), although multivariable analysis was not significant (EAD vs HA odds ratio, 2.17; 95% CI, 0.83-5.66; P = .10).

CONCLUSIONS

Extended arch interventions pose similar perioperative mortality and neurologic risks as Hemiarch. Descending aortic reinforcement may promote malperfusion restoration. Extended techniques should be approached with caution in acute dissection due to increased risk of adverse events.

Analysis of current mortality risk scores for acute type A aortic dissection: The Siena experience

OBJECTIVE

In literature, various risk scores have been described to predict in-hospital mortality of patients undergoing surgery for acute type A dissection. We want to evaluate which factors are most correlated with a negative outcome and testing the validity of the current scores in literature analyzing our experience of over 20 years in the surgery of type A aortic dissections.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 324 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to 30-day survival or mortality. The preoperative variables analyzed are the parameters necessary for the calculation of scores: Penn Classification, Leipzig Halifax and adjusted Leipzig Halifax score, GERAADA score and EuroSCORE II. Intra- and post-operative mortality were 10.2% and 17.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the preoperative predictors of 30-day mortality were age greater than 70 years, low eject fraction levels, visceral and coronary malperfusion. Both GERAADA and EuroSCORE II were statistically significant predictors of 30-day mortality. However, EuroSCORE II underestimates the mortality compared to GERAADA score probably due to the lack of evaluation of fundamental preoperative factors in the course of type A aortic dissection.

RESULTS

The study has demonstrated the efficacy of the GERAADA score in predicting the outcome of patients undergoing surgery and the underestimation of the mortality of EuroSCORE II in our population.

Mortality after non-surgically treated acute type A aortic dissection is higher than previously reported

OBJECTIVES

It has been commonly accepted that untreated acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) results in an hourly mortality rate of 1-2% during the 1st 24 h after symptom onset. The data to support this statement rely solely on patients who have been denied surgical treatment after reaching surgical centres. The objective was to perform a total review of non-surgically treated (NST) ATAAD and provide contemporary mortality data.

METHODS

This was a regional, retrospective, observational study. All patients receiving one of the following diagnoses: International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 4410, 4411, 4415, 4416 or ICD-10 I710, I711, I715, I718 in an area of 1.9 million inhabitants in Southern Sweden during a period of 23 years (January 1998 to November 2021) were retrospectively screened. The search was conducted using all available medical registries so that every patient diagnosed with ATAAD in our region was identified. The charts and imaging of each screened patient were subsequently reviewed to confirm or discard the diagnosis of ATAAD.

RESULTS

Screening identified 2325 patients, of whom 184 NST ATAAD patients were included. The mortality of NST ATAAD was 47.3 ± 4.4%, 55.0 ± 4.4%, 76.7 ± 3.7% and 83.9 ± 4.3% at 24 h, 48 h, 14 days and 1 year, respectively. The hourly mortality rate during the 1st 24 h after symptom onset was 2.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study observed higher mortality than has previously been reported. It emphasizes the need for timely diagnosis, swift management and emergent surgical treatment for patients suffering an acute type A aortic dissection.

Validation of the GERAADA score to predict 30-day mortality in acute type A aortic dissection in a single high-volume aortic centre

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate employing the German Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Type A (GERAADA) score to predict 30-day mortality in an aortic centre in the USA.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and June 2021, 689 consecutive patients underwent surgery for acute type A dissection at a single institution. Excluded were patients with missing clinical data (N = 4). The GERAADA risk score was retrospectively calculated via a web-based application. Model discrimination power was calculated with c-statistics from logistic regression and reported as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with 95% confidence intervals. The calibration was measured by calculating the observed versus estimated mortality ratio. The Brier score was used for the overall model evaluation.

RESULTS

Included were 685 patients [mean age 60.6 years (SD: 13.5), 64.8% male] who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. The 30-day mortality rate was 12.0%. The GERAADA score demonstrated very good discrimination power with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.762 (95% confidence interval 0.703-0.821). The entire cohort's observed versus estimated mortality ratio was 0.543 (0.439-0.648), indicating an overestimation of the model-calculated risk. The Brier score was 0.010, thus revealing the model's acceptable overall performance.

CONCLUSIONS

The GERAADA score is a practical and easily accessible tool for reliably estimating the 30-day mortality risk of patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. This model may naturally overestimate risk in patients undergoing surgery in experienced aortic centres.

Treatment strategies and in-hospital mortality in patients with type A acute aortic dissection and coronary artery involvement

OBJECTIVE

Type A acute aortic dissection (AAD), especially that with coronary artery involvement and malperfusion, is a life-threatening disease. In the present study we aimed to investigate the association of surgical treatment and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with in-hospital mortality in patients with type A AAD and coronary artery involvement.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter registry in Japan included 225 patients with type A AAD and coronary artery involvement. Treatment strategies including surgical treatment and/or PCI were left to treating physicians. The primary end point was in-hospital death.

RESULTS

Of 225 patients, dissection extended into the right and left coronary arteries and both in 115 (51.1%), 105 (46.7%), and 5 (2.2%), respectively. Overall, 94 (41.8%) patients died during the hospitalization. Coronary angiography was performed in 53 (23.6%) patients, among whom 39 (73.6%) underwent PCI. Surgical repair was performed in 188 (83.6%) patients. In patients who received neither procedure, 33 of 35 (94.3%) died during the hospitalization. PCI was performed as a bridge to surgical repair in 37 of 39 (94.9%) patients, and in-hospital mortality of patients who underwent PCI and surgical procedures was 24.3%. Multivariable analysis identified PCI and surgical procedures as factors associated with lower in-hospital mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary artery involvement in type A AAD was associated with high in-hospital mortality of more than 40% in the current era. An early reperfusion strategy with PCI as a bridge to surgical repair might improve clinical outcomes in this fatal condition.

Biomarkers for Risk Stratification in Patients With Type A Acute Aortic Dissection

Type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a fatal disease and thus, accurate and objective risk stratification is essential. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of readily available and assessable biomarkers in patients with type A AAD. This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study. A total of 703 patients with type A AAD diagnosed using contrast-enhanced computed tomography were included. Therapeutic strategies were left to the physician's discretion in a real-world clinical setting. The prognostic value for in-hospital mortality was examined in 15 circulating biomarkers on admission, which are routinely available in clinical practice. Of the 703 patients, 126 (17.9%) died during the hospitalization. Of the 15 biomarkers, the multivariable analysis identified positive cardiac troponin, a low total bilirubin (T-Bil) level, and increased levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as significant predictors of in-hospital death. The receiver operating characteristics curve analysis showed that these 4 biomarkers had an independent additive prognostic value. With the cut-off values of T-Bil, BNP, and LDH, in combination with positive troponin, the increase in the number of positive biomarkers was progressively associated with higher in-hospital mortality from 1.3% to 9.8%, 20.5%, 36.4%, and 75.0% (p <0.001). In conclusion, in patients with type A AAD, positive cardiac troponin, a low T-Bil level, and increased levels of BNP and LDH on admission were related to higher in-hospital mortality, with an incremental prognostic value, suggesting that the readily available and assessable biomarkers can aid in decision-making in therapeutic strategies.

Successful Primary PCI in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection Complicated by Inferior ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Case in a Facility with No Surgical Backup

Mortality of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) complicated with coronary malperfusion syndrome is very high even when emergency surgery is performed. Several reports suggested that primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) followed by immediate corrective surgery may reduce mortality. In many countries, immediate transfer to an aortic surgery center may not be possible. We report a case of TAAD complicated by coronary malperfusion successfully treated with PPCI followed by elective corrective surgery. A 48-year-old man was referred to emergency department with acute inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and underwent PPCI. During the procedure, we realized that the cause of STEMI was TAAD. We decided to continue because the patient experienced seizures and bradycardia. Subsequently, echocardiography and computed tomography confirmed the dissection. The patient was discharged and referred to the National Cardiovascular Center where he underwent successful elective surgery. In this patient, immediate revascularization was lifesaving and served as a bridging procedure before surgical correction.

Trilateral versus Bilateral Antegrade Cerebral Perfusion in Frozen Elephant Trunk: A Propensity Score Analysis

OBJECTIVE

 Spinal cord injury (SCI) with subsequent paraplegia and/or stroke after arch repair with frozen elephant trunk (FET) remain the most devastating complications. In this study, we aim to examine the impact of different cerebral perfusion strategies on the neurological outcome comparing bilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (bACP) and trilateral antegrade cerebral perfusion (tACP).

METHODS

 Between 2009 and 2021, 88 patients underwent total arch replacement using a hybrid prosthesis in FET technique for acute (40.4%) and chronic (59.6%) aortic pathologies. After excluding 14 patients who underwent FET with unilateral ACP the remaining 74 patients were divided into two groups. Propensity score matching was performed based on pre- and perioperative patient characteristics resulting in 22 patients in each group. The primary endpoint was a combination of major cerebral event and SCI. Secondary end point was all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

 Major cerebral events occurred in 9% of the patients in bACP versus 13.6% in tACP group (p = 0.63). No postoperative SCI was observed in patients with bACP and only one patient suffered SCI with tACP (p = 0.31). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups (22.7% in bACP vs. 13.6% in tACP; p = 0.43).

CONCLUSION

 In patients undergoing total aortic arch repair using FET technique, both perfusion strategies (bilateral and trilateral ACP) are safe and effective. The rates of neurological complications as well as mortalities are acceptably low in both groups. Further studies with larger patient cohorts are warranted.

Optimized strategy to improve the outcomes of acute type A aortic dissection with malperfusion syndrome

BACKGROUND

The mortality of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) with malperfusion syndrome (MPS) is high. However, the management strategy remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the strategy for MPS at our institution.

METHODS

Among 724 patients with ATAAD, 167 patients with MPS were treated with immediate central repair (first stage) or an optimized strategy (second stage). In the second stage, the optimized strategy used was based on 6-hour threshold from symptom onset. For MPS with symptom onset within 6 hours, immediate central repair was performed, followed by endovascular reperfusion if malperfusion persisted. With symptom onset beyond 6 hours, individualized delayed central repair was performed. We compared outcomes between the first and second stages.

RESULTS

The in-hospital mortality of ATAAD was significantly decreased when the optimized strategy was used (4.3% in the second stage vs 12.5% in the first stage; P < .01). In the second stage, the in-hospital mortality for MPS was decreased (10.2% vs 33.9%; P < .01). Moreover, the in-hospital mortality for MPS with symptom onset within 6 hours and beyond 6 hours decreased from 24% to 7.5% and from 41.2% to 11.8%, respectively. The operative mortality of MPS in the second stage was comparable to that in patients without MPS (4.0% vs 2.4%; P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The optimized strategy significantly improved the outcomes of MPS. The 6-hour threshold from symptom onset could be very useful in determining the timing of central repair. For patients with MPS symptom onset within 6 hours, immediate central repair is reasonable; for those with symptom onset beyond 6 hours, individualized delayed central repair should be considered.

Effect of Asymptomatic Common Carotid Artery Dissection on the Prognosis of Patients With Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

Acute type A aortic dissection can extend upwards to involve the common carotid artery. However, whether asymptomatic common carotid artery dissection (CCAD) requires surgical repair remains controversial. This study aimed to explore the effect of asymptomatic CCAD without surgical intervention on the prognosis of patients who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between January 2015 and December 2017, 485 patients with no neurological symptoms who underwent surgery for acute type A aortic dissection were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the exposure factor of CCAD. CCAD was detected in 111 patients (22.9%), and after adjusting baseline data (standardized mean difference <0.1), the 30-day mortality (17.1% versus 6.0%, P<0.001) and incidence of fatal stroke (7.7% versus 1.6%, P=0.001) were significantly higher in the group with CCAD. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses found CCAD as an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 2.8 [95% CI, 1.5-5.2]; P=0.001). At a median follow-up of 6.2 years (interquartile range, 5.6-6.9 years), landmark analysis with a cutoff value of 1 month postoperatively showed a significant increase in mortality in the group with CCAD, especially in the first month (log-rank P=0.002) and no significant difference in survival after the first month postoperatively between the 2 groups (log-rank P=0.955).

CONCLUSIONS

Asymptomatic CCAD increased the risk of early fatal stroke and death in patients with acute type A aortic dissection after surgery but did not affect midterm survival in patients who survived the early postoperative period.

Comprehensive review of aortic aneurysms, dissections, and cardiovascular complications in connective tissue disorders

Connective tissue disorders, including Marfan syndrome (MS) and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS), are characterized by genetic mutations affecting connective tissue structural integrity. These disorders significantly elevate the risk of aortic dissection, a life-threatening condition. This comprehensive review delves into the intricate interplay between connective tissue disorders and aortic dissection, shedding light on the clinical features, pathophysiology, genetic underpinnings, diagnostic approaches, clinical management, associated comorbidities, and prognosis, mainly focusing on MS and EDS, while also exploring rare connective tissue disorders and forms of cutis laxa contributing to aortic pathology.

Current review of acute type A aortic dissection in Malaysia

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) still poses significant challenges and management dilemmas for cardiovascular surgeons worldwide. Despite the continuous improvement in diagnosis and management strategies for ATAAD, clinical outcomes remain poor and the optimal therapy is still debatable especially those with malperfusion syndrome (MPS). This review is based on the current literature and includes the results from the Aortic Registry of National Heart Institute of Malaysia (NHIM) database. It covers different aspects of ATAAD and concentrates on the outcome of surgical repair. The diagnosis is often delayed leading to variable outcomes. High index of suspicion and urgent treatment is required to tackle this dynamic disease which include the variation in presentation and clinical course. Different surgical techniques and perfusion strategies have been described to save patients. Complex techniques such as total arch replacement (TAR) with frozen elephant trunk and valve sparing root surgery may provide long-term benefit in selected patients, but require significant surgical expertise and experience.

Is central repair with coronary artery bypass grafting enough for multi-organ malperfusion in acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion?

OBJECTIVES

Acute type A aortic dissection with coronary malperfusion syndrome is rare but associated with high mortality. Multi-organ malperfusion is an independent predictor of acute type A aortic dissection. Coronary malperfusion requires treatment, but it is not feasible to treat all malperfusions. The adequacy of "central repair and coronary artery bypass grafting" for patients with coronary and other organ malperfusion is unknown.

METHODS

Of the 299 patients who underwent surgery between 2008 and 2018, 21 patients with coronary malperfusion, who received cental repair with coronary artery graft bypass, were analyzed retrospectively. They were divided; into Group M (n = 13, coronary and other organ malperfusion) and Group O (n = 8, coronary malperfusion only). The patient background, surgical content, details of malperfusion, surgical mortality and morbidity, and long-term outcome were compared.

RESULTS

There was no difference in operation time (205 ± 30 vs. 266 ± 88, p = 0.49), but the time from arrival to circulatory arrest tended to be shorter in Group M (81 vs. 134, p = 0.05). Among Group M, cerebral malperfusion was the most common at 92%. Two of the three cases with mesenteric malperfusion died. The mortality of Group M and Group O was 13% and 15% (P = 0.85), respectively. There was no difference in long-term mortality (p = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Central repair and coronary artery bypass grafting is a sufficiently acceptable treatment for patients with acute type A aortic dissection and multi-organ malperfusion, including coronary malperfusion.

Inflammatory profiles define phenotypes with clinical relevance in acute type A aortic dissection

Association of distinct inflammatory profiles with short-term mortality is little known in type A aortic dissection (TAAD). Latent class analysis was used to identify distinct inflammatory profiles based on leukocyte, neutrophils, monocyte, lymphocytes, platelet, fibrinogen, D-dimer, neutrophils-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, and lymphocyte-monocyte ratio. We identified 193 patients with median age of 56 (IQR 47-63) years and 146 males. Patients were divided as hyper-inflammatory profiles (84 [43.5%]) and hypo-inflammatory profiles (109 [56.5%]). Although baseline characteristics were not different, hyper-inflammatory patients had higher 6-month mortality (20 [23.8%] vs. 11 [10.1%]; P = 0.014) and 30-day mortality (18 [21.4%] vs. 9 [8.3%], P = 0.009) than hypo-inflammatory patients. After adjustment for potential confounders, hyper-inflammatory profiles remain associated with higher risk of 6-month mortality than hypo-inflammatory profiles (adjusted OR 2.427 [95%CI 1.154, 5.105], P = 0.019). Assessment of preoperative inflammatory profiles adds clarity regarding the extent of inflammatory response to TAAD aetiopathologies, highlighting individual anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy for TAAD. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04398992.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic intramural hematoma

BACKGROUND

Although type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) including classic double-channel aorta and intramural hematoma (IMH) is a life-threatening condition, the prognostic impact and predictors of IMH remain to be established. The present study evaluated the prevalence, baseline characteristics, and outcomes of IMH as compared with classic non-thrombosed type A AAD.

METHODS

This multicenter registry in Japan retrospectively included 703 patients with type A AAD. IMH was defined as a crescentic or circular area along the ascending aortic wall without contrast enhancement on computed tomography (CT). Non-thrombosed type A AAD was defined as the classic double-channel ascending aorta on contrast-enhanced CT. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 703 patients with type A AAD, 312 (44.3%) had IMH. Older age was an only baseline patient factor significantly associated with the presence of IMH in the multivariable analysis. The longitudinal extent of dissection was greater in patients with classic non-thrombosed AAD than those with IMH, resulting in an increased risk of end-organ malperfusion in the classic AAD group. During the hospitalization, 41 (13.1%) and 85 (21.7%) patients with and without IMH died (p < 0.001). IMH was associated with lower in-hospital mortality in a multivariable model, irrespective of age and the implementation of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that IMH on CT was frequent among patients with type A AAD. Although IMH was more likely to be present in the elderly, its effect on the better survival was independent of age and surgical treatment.

Influence of a regional network combined with a systematic multidisciplinary approach on the outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

Whether in patients with acute type A aortic dissection reduction of intervals between onset of symptoms and diagnosis influences patient outcomes is still not completely defined.

METHODS

In 199 patients with acute type A aortic dissection, the efficacy of a systematic multidisciplinary approach and institution of a regional network were evaluated; 90 patients operated before 2016 (Group1) were compared with 109 repaired after 2016 (Group2) for early and late outcomes.

RESULTS

Mortality was reduced from 13% in Group1 to 4% in Group2 (p = 0.013). In Group2 a more patients (46%) had arch replacement compared to Group1 (29%)(p = 0.06). In Group2 axillary artery cannulation was almost routinely used (91% vs 67%, p < 0.001) with shorter circulatory arrest time (37 vs 44 min, p < 0.001). The interval from diagnosis to surgery dropped from 210 min in Group1 to 160 min in Group2 (p < 0.001); this reduction was evident both in patients admitted to the emergency department of a spoke and/or a hub center. Patients presenting with or developing shock were reduced from Group1 to Group2 and in particular those reaching the hub center from spoke centers. Survival at 1 and 5 years was 82 ± 4% and 70 ± 5% in Group1 vs 92 ± 3% and 87 ± 8% in Group2 (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection improved using a systematic multidisciplinary approach while a network between spoke and hub centers reduced intervals between diagnosis, transportation to hub center and repair, limiting the incidence of tamponade and shock.

Retrospective investigation of >400 patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair with or without cerebrospinal fluid drainage

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to analyse the risks and benefits of cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) placement in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2020, 411 patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair in 1 institution where 236 patients (57%) received a preoperative CSFD. Patient and outcome characteristics were retrospectively analysed and compared between patients with and without preoperative CSFD placement.

RESULTS

Preoperative CSFD was performed significantly more frequently in elective patients, especially those undergoing distal stent graft extension following frozen elephant trunk-stent placement (P < 0.001). Significantly fewer CSFD was placed in patients with acute aortic injury (P < 0.001). The incidence of permanent spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) was higher in patients without preoperative CSFD [10 patients (2%) vs 1 patient (0.2%), P = 0.001]. Postoperative CSFD was placed in 3 patients (0.7%). Severe CSFD-associated complications affected 2 patients (0.5%) namely, a subdural spinal haematoma causing permanent paraplegia in one of those 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CSFS placement is associated with low procedural risk and can potentially help to prevent SCI. However, the SCI incidence is most likely also associated with other preoperative factors including the patient's haemodynamics. Hence, a general recommendation for placing a preoperative CSFD cannot be made when relying on the present evidence.

The impact of malperfusion patterns in elderly patients undergoing surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to investigate the outcome of elderly patients with surgically treated acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) complicated by malperfusion.

METHODS

Patients ≥70 years old who underwent surgical treatment for ATAAD between January 2000 and December 2020 were enrolled in this study and stratified by their specific Penn Classification into 4 different subgroups, where Penn Abc was defined as multilevel malperfusion. Short- and long-term outcomes were investigated. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for 1-year mortality.

RESULTS

Four hundred elderly patients underwent surgical treatment for ATAAD. A total of 204 (51%) patients had no evidence of malperfusion (Penn Aa), 106 (26.5%) had localized organic malperfusion (Penn Ab), 44 (11%) patients had systemic malperfusion (Penn Ac) and 46 (11.5%) suffered from multilevel malperfusion (Penn Abc). For the latter, in-hospital mortality was 70% (P < 0.001). Age (P < 0.006) and multilevel malperfusion (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for 1-year mortality. Patients with multilevel malperfusion showed the worst 1-year survival (P < 0.001). In the case of Penn Aa, in-hospital mortality was 13% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery may lead to satisfactory results in the absence of malperfusion, even in octogenarians. Elderly patients with multilevel malperfusion show very poor surgical outcome. In these patients, the decision for surgery should be taken with caution. Operation, if performed, should be carried out by experienced teams only.

Influence of Impaired Hydration Status on Postoperative in-Hospital Death in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Background

The hydration state of the body is getting more and more attention from researchers. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between impaired hydration status and postoperative hospitalization death in patients with A AAD.

Methods

From January 2019 to October 2021, the clinical data of 299 patients undergoing A AAD surgery were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into normal hydration group, imminent dehydration group and current dehydration group according to the dehydration standard at admission. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to determine the independent risk factors for in-hospital death of patients with A AAD.

Results

Postoperative in-hospital death in A AAD patients was significantly more common in the imminent and current dehydration groups (>295mmol/L) (26.7% vs 11.9%; P=0.001). The length of ICU stay was significantly longer in the impending and current dehydration groups (P<0.05). After controlling for other factors by multivariate logistic regression analysis, the results showed that the group of impending and current dehydration (>295) (OR=3.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.61-8.06; P=0.002), CRRT (OR=10.55, 95%[CI]: 3.59-31.01; P<0.001), lactic acid (OR=1.25, 95%[CI]: 1.13-1.38; P<0.001), CAD (OR=5.27, 95%[CI]: 1.12-24.80; P=0.035) was an independent risk factor for in-hospital death in A AAD patients. Albumin (OR=0.92, 95%[CI]: 0.85-0.99; P=0.040) is a protective factor.

Conclusion

The presence of high serum osmotic pressure on admission of A AAD patients can independently predict postoperative death, and the impaired body hydration status should be paid attention to.

Current Knowledge on the Interaction of Human Cytomegalovirus Infection, Encoded miRNAs, and Acute Aortic Syndrome

Aortic dissection is a clinicopathological entity caused by rupture of the intima, leading to a high mortality if not treated. Over time, diagnostic and investigative methods, antihypertensive therapy, and early referrals have resulted in improved outcomes according to registry data. Some data have also emerged from recent studies suggesting a link between Human Cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection and aortic dissection. Furthermore, the use of microRNAs has also become increasingly widespread in the literature. These have been noted to play a role in aortic dissections with elevated levels noted in studies as early as 2017. This review aims to provide a broad and holistic overview of the role of miRNAs, while studying the role of HCMV infection in the context of aortic dissections. The roles of long non-coding RNAs, circular RNAs, and microRNAs are explored to identify changes in expression during aortic dissections. The use of such biomarkers may one day be translated into clinical practice to allow early detection and prognostication of outcomes and drive preventative and therapeutic options in the future.

Time-of-day discrepancy for the long-term surgical outcome of patients with aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

It has been suggested that the time of day when cardiovascular surgery is performed may affect the surgery outcomes. This study investigated whether there was a difference in risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity outcomes between patients undergoing acute aortic dissection (AAD) during the day or the night.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who had undergone Stanford A AAD surgery were enrolled between 2016 and 2020. In the daytime group, surgery was performed between 08:00 and 20:00, and in the nighttime group between 20:00 and 8:00. The primary outcome was in-hospital overall mortality, and the secondary outcomes were overall mortality within a median follow-up time of 35.2 (17.0, 53.5) months and the occurrence of re-entry tears and major bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 925 patients were enrolled. The primary outcome of in-hospital overall mortality did not differ significantly between patients who received daytime or nighttime surgery. Similarly, the secondary outcomes of overall mortality during the follow-up and incidence of re-entry tears and major bleeding did not differ significantly between the groups. Subgroup analysis was also performed according to the surgery type (modified triple-branched stent graft implantation or frozen elephant trunk implantation) and surgical approach (partial upper sternotomy or full median sternotomy) confirming that the time of surgery did not significantly influence the outcomes. Cox regression analysis showed that time from onset to admission (P = 0.036) and time from the onset to surgery (P = 0.045) were significant risk factors for increased mortality during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The time of day when thoracotomy was performed did not significantly affect the clinical outcome and is therefore not a consideration for the improvement of outcome in Stanford A AAD patients.

Prevalence and prognostic impact of stress-induced hyperglycemia in patients with acute type A aortic dissection

AIMS

To explore the prevalence of stress-induced hyperglycemia (SIH) in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients without diabetes, and its impact on short-term and long-term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 1098 patients with confirmed diagnosis of ATAAD were consecutively enrolled. According to the admission blood glucose (BG), patients were divided into the normoglycemia group (BG < 7.8 mmol/L), mild to moderate SIH group (7.8 ≤ BG < 11.1 mmol/L) and severe SIH group (BG ≥ 11.1 mmol/L). Multivariate regression analysis were used to explore the association between SIH and mortality risk.

RESULTS

There were 421 ATAAD patients (38.3%) with SIH, including 361 cases (32.9%) in the mild to moderate group and 60 cases (5.46%) in the severe group. The proportion of high-risk clinical manifestations and conservative treatment was greater in the SIH group than the normoglycemia group. Severe SIH was associated with high risk of 30-day (OR: 3.773, 95%CI: 1.004-14.189, P = 0.0494) and 1-year mortality risk (OR: 3.522 95%CI: 1.018-12.189, P = 0.0469).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 40% of the patients with ATAAD had SIH, and were more likely to present with high-risk clinical features and receive non-surgical treatment. Severe SIH could be used as an independent predictor of increased short-term and long-term mortality risk and reflect the disease severity of ATAAD.

Does intensive blood pressure control benefit type B aortic dissection patients who undergoing surgical repair?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this research is to determine the optimum blood pressure (BP) control goal for hypertensive type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

Between January 2019 and April 2021, 259 hypertensive TBAD patients undergoing surgery were included in the research. 98 patients received intensive BP control with a target of systolic BP (SBP) < 120 mmHg, and 161 received standard BP control targeting SBP between 120 and 140 mmHg. Clinical data from two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Patients who received intensive BP control experienced a significantly higher incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) postoperatively (21/98, 21.4% vs 14/161, 8.7%, p = 0.004). The intensive group took more anti-hypertensive drugs per day compared with the standard group (1.9 vs 1.5, p < 0.001). Triple-drug combination treatment was more frequent in the intensive group (38.8% vs 14.3%, p < 0.001), as were angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB; 67.3% vs 44.7%, p 0.001), and thiazide-like diuretic (44.9% vs 18.0%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive BP control treatment increases the incidence of AKI and raises the utilization of the anti-hypertensive drug, but did not reduce the operative mortality and late mortality in TBAD patients undergoing surgical repair.

Lower-extremity malperfusion syndrome in patients undergoing proximal aortic surgery for acute type A aortic dissection

Objective

Data regarding management of lower-extremity malperfusion in the setting of type A aortic dissection are limited. This study aimed to compare acute type A aortic dissection with lower-extremity malperfusion outcomes in patients undergoing lower-extremity revascularization with no revascularization.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing acute type A aortic dissection surgery were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Perioperative variables were compared between patients with and without lower-extremity malperfusion. Factors associated with lower-extremity malperfusion, revascularization, and mortality were determined using univariable Cox regression and Firth's penalized likelihood modeling.

Results

From January 2007 to December 2021, 601 patients underwent proximal aortic repair for acute type A aortic dissection at a quaternary care center. Of these, 85 of 601 patients (14%) presented with lower-extremity malperfusion and were more often male (P = .02), had concomitant moderate or greater aortic insufficiency (P = .05), had lower ejection fraction (P = .004), had preoperative dialysis dependence (P = .01), and had additional cerebral, visceral, and renal malperfusion syndromes (P < .001). Kaplan-Meier estimated survival fared worse with lower-extremity malperfusion compared with no lower-extremity malperfusion at 1, 5, and 10 years (84% vs 77%, 74% vs 71%, 65% vs 52%, respectively, P = .03). In the lower-extremity malperfusion group, 15 of 85 patients (18%) underwent lower-extremity revascularization without significant differences in postoperative morbidity and mortality compared with patients not undergoing revascularization. Need for peripheral revascularization was associated with peripheral vascular disease (hazard ratio, 3.7 [1.0-14.0], P = .05) and pulse deficit (hazard ratio, 5.6 [1.3-24.0], P = .02) at presentation.

Conclusions

Patients presenting with type A aortic dissection and lower-extremity malperfusion have worse overall survival compared with those without lower-extremity malperfusion. However, not all patients with type A aortic dissection and lower-extremity malperfusion require revascularization.

The Gender Gap in Aortic Dissection: A Prospective Analysis of Risk and Outcomes

Aortic dissection (AD) is a severe cardiovascular condition that could have negative consequences. Our study employed a prospective design and examined preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data to evaluate the effects of gender on various medical conditions. We looked at how gender affected the results of aortic dissection (AD). In contrast to female patients who had more systemic hypertension (p=0.031), male patients had higher rates of hemopericardium (p=0.003), pulmonary hypertension (p=0.039), and hemopericardium (p=0.003). Dobutamine administration during surgery significantly raised the mortality risk (p=0.015). There were noticeably more women patients (p=0.01) in the 71 to 80 age group. Significant differences in age (p=0.004), eGFR at admission (p=0.009), and eGFR at discharge (p=0.006) were seen, however, there was no association between gender and mortality. In conclusion, our findings highlight that gender may no longer be such an important aspect of aortic dissection disease as we previously thought, and this information could have an important contribution for surgeons as well as for anesthesiologists involved in the management of acute aortic dissection.

Extra-anatomic revascularization and a new cannulation strategy for preoperative cerebral malperfusion due to severe stenosis or occlusion of supra-aortic branch vessels in acute type A aortic dissection

Objectives

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) with severe stenosis or occlusion of the true lumen of aortic arch branch vessels often leads to an increased incidence of severe postsurgical neurological complications and mortality rate. In this study, we aimed to introduce our institutional extra-anatomic revascularization and cannulation strategy with improved postoperative outcomes for better management of patients with cerebral malperfusion in the setting of ATAAD.

Methods

Twenty-eight patients with ATAAD complicated by severe stenosis or occlusion of the aortic arch branch vessels, as noted on combined computed tomography angiography of the aorta and craniocervical artery, between January 2021 and June 2022 were included in this study. Basic patient characteristics, surgical procedures, hospitalization stays, and early follow-up results were analyzed.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 16.5 months (interquartile range: 11.5-20.5), with a 100% completion rate. The 30-day mortality rates was 7.1% (2/28 patients); two patients had multiple cerebral infarctions on preoperative computed tomography and persistent coma. Postoperative transient neurological dysfunction occurred in 10.7% (3/28) of the patients, and no new permanent neurological dysfunction occurred. Of all the patients, 3.6% (1/28) had novel acute renal failure. No other deaths, secondary surgeries, or serious complications occurred during the early follow-up period.

Conclusions

Use of extra-anatomic revascularization and a new cannulation strategy before cardiopulmonary bypass is safe and feasible and may reduce the high incidence of postoperative neurological complications in patients with ATAAD and cerebral malperfusion.

Preceding Aortic Bare Stenting for Visceral and Limb Malperfusion before Proximal Surgical Repair of Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection

Mesenteric malperfusion is a fatal complication of acute aortic dissection, which should rapidly be repaired. However, the optimal treatment strategy remains controversial in patients with type A aortic dissection. We report on a case with aortic bare stenting for visceral and lower limb malperfusion prior to the proximal repair. The visceral and limb reperfusion was obtained after aortic bare stenting and proximal repair was successfully performed. This technique can be an alternative option for visceral malperfusion due to type A aortic dissection. However, careful patient selection is required considering the risk of new dissection and rupture.

Surgical Strategy for the Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Multicenter Study

Type A acute aortic dissection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with prompt referral imaging and management to tertiary referral centers needed urgently. Surgery is usually needed emergently, but the choice of surgery often varies depending on the patient and the presentation. Staff and center expertise also play a major role in determining the surgical strategy employed. The aim of this study was to compare the early- and medium-term outcomes of patients undergoing a conservative approach extended only to the ascending aorta and the hemiarch to those of patients subjected to extensive surgery (total arch reconstruction and root replacement) across three European referral centers. A retrospective study was conducted across three sites between January 2008 and December 2021. In total, 601 patients were included within the study, of which 30% were female, and the median age was 64.4 years. The most common operation was ascending aorta replacement (n = 246, 40.9%). The aortic repair was extended proximally (i.e., root n = 105; 17.5%) and distally (i.e., arch n = 250; 41.6%). A more extensive approach, extending from the root to the arch, was employed in 24 patients (4.0%). Operative mortality occurred in 146 patients (24.3%), and the most common morbidity was stroke (75, 12.6%). An increased length of ICU admission was noted in the extensive surgery group, which comprised younger and more frequently male patients. No significant differences were noted in surgical mortality between patients managed with extensive surgery and those managed conservatively. However, age, arterial lactate levels, "intubated/sedated" status on arrival, and "emergency or salvage" status at presentation were independent predictors of mortality both within the index hospitalization and during the follow-up. The overall survival was similar between the groups.

Comparison of Bretschneider HTK cardioplegia solution and blood cardioplegia in terms of postoperative results in patients who underwent isolated supracoronary ascending aortic replacement

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac arrest with cardioplegia is the most common and reliable method of myocardial protection in cardiac surgery, but there is no definite consensus on the use of different types of cardioplegia. Two of the commonly used types of cardioplegia are Bretschneider histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (Custodiol) and conventional blood cardioplegia. In this study, Custodiol solution and conventional blood cardioplegia used in patients with type A aortic dissection who underwent supracoronary ascending aortic replacement were aimed to be compared in terms of postoperative results.

METHODS

70 patients with type A aortic dissection who underwent supracoronary ascending aortic replacement in our clinic between January 2011 - October 2020 were included. Patients were divided into two groups, blood cardioplegia group (n = 48) and Custodiol group (n = 22) and they were compared regarding preoperative, perioperative and postoperative variables.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time (p = 0.17 and p = 0.16, respectively). Mechanical ventilator weaning time, intensive care unit stay and hospital stay were shorter in Custodiol group (p = 0.04,p = 0.03 and p = 0.05, respectively). While inotropic support need was higher in the blood cardioplegia group (p = 0.001), there was no significant difference in terms of mortality, arrhythmia, neurological complications and renal complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that Custodiol cardioplegia solution may be superior to blood cardioplegia in reducing mechanical ventilation weaning period, intensive care and hospital stay, and reducing the use of inotropic agents in patients with type A aortic dissection undergoing supracoronary ascending aorta replacement.

Night-time surgery for type a aortic dissection: Immediate or delaying?

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate whether surgery performed during night compared with daytime were associated with an increased risk of operative mortality of type A aortic dissection (TAAD) patients.

METHODS

A total of 2015 TAAD patients who underwent surgical repair were collected from two cardiovascular centers from Jan 2015 to Jan 2021. According to the start time of surgery, patients were divided into daytime group (06:01 a.m. to 06:00 p.m.) and night-time group (06:01 p.m. to 06:00 a.m.), and retrospective analyses were performed between them.

RESULTS

The operative mortality of night-time group (12.2%, 43/352) was dramatically higher than daytime group (6.9%, 115/1663; p = 0.001). There was significant difference between night-time and daytime groups in terms of 30-days mortality (5.8% vs 10.8%; p = 0.001) and in-hospital mortality (3.5% vs 6.0%; p = 0.03). The night-time group had a longer duration of intensive care unit stay (4 vs two; days; p < 0.001) and ventilation support (34 vs 19; hours; p < 0.001), compared with daytime group. The risk factors for operative mortality were night-time surgery (odds ratio [OR], 1.545; p = 0.027), age (odds ratio, 1.152; p < 0.001), total arch replacement (OR, 2.265; p < 0.001) and previous aortic surgery (OR, 2.376; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Night-time surgical repair may be associated with higher operative mortality of patients with TAAD. Nevertheless, it is reasonable to offer emergency surgery at night-time for such patients who were more likely to present disastrous complications with delayed surgical intervention, as outcomes indicate acceptable operative mortality.

Systematic Innominate Artery Cannulation Strategy in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Better Perfusion, Better Results

(1) Background: Arterial cannulation in type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) is still subject to debate. We describe a systematic approach of using the innominate artery for arterial perfusion (2) Methods: The hospital records of 110 consecutive patients with acute TAAAD operated on between January 2014 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The effect of the cannulation site on early and late mortality, as well as on cardio-pulmonary perfusion indices (lactate and base excess levels, and cooling and rewarming speed) were investigated. (3) Results: There was a significant difference in early mortality (8.82% vs. 40.79%, p < 0.01) but no difference in long-term survival beyond the first 30 days. Using the innominate artery enabled the use of approximately 20% higher CPB flows (2.73 ± 0.1 vs. 2.42 ± 0.06 L/min/m² BSA, p < 0.01), which resulted in more rapid cooling (1.89 ± 0.77 vs. 3.13 ± 1.62 min/°C/m² BSA, p < 0.01), rewarming (2.84 ± 1.36 vs. 4.22 ± 2.23, p < 0.01), lower mean base excess levels during CPB (-5.01 ± 2.99 mEq/L vs. -6.66 ± 3.37 mEq/L, p = 0.01) and lower lactate levels at the end of the procedure (4.02 ± 2.48 mmol/L vs. 6.63 ± 4.17 mmol/L, p < 0.01). Postoperative permanent neurologic insult (3.12% vs. 20%, p = 0.02) and acute kidney injury (3.12% vs. 32.81%, p < 0.01) were significantly reduced. (4) Conclusions: systematic use of the innominate artery enables better perfusion and superior results in TAAAD repair.

Outcomes of type A acute aortic dissection with cardiopulmonary arrest: Tokyo Acute Aortic Super-network Registry

OBJECTIVES

Preventing loss of life in patients with type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) who present with cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) can be extremely difficult. Thus, we investigated the early outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

Patients with type A AAD who were transported to hospitals belonging to the Tokyo Acute Aortic Super-network between January 2015 and December 2019 were considered for this study. We assessed the early mortality of these patients presenting with CPA and also investigated the differences in outcomes between patients with out-of-hospital and in-hospital CPA.

RESULTS

A total of 3307 patients with type A AAD were transported, 434 (13.1%) of whom presented with CPA. The overall mortality of patients presenting with CPA was 88.2% (383/434), of which 94.5% (240/254) experienced out-of-hospital CPA and 79.4% (143/180) experienced in-hospital CPA (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that aortic surgery [odds ratio (OR), 0.022; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.008-0.060; P < 0.001] and patient age over 80 years (OR, 2.946; 95% CI, 1.012-8.572; P = 0.047) were related with mortality in patients with type A AAD and CPA. Between in-hospital and out-of-hospital CPA, the proportions of DeBakey type 1 (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.065-5.054; P = 0.034), cerebral malperfusion (OR, 0.188; 95% CI, 0.056-0.629; P = 0.007), aortic surgery (OR, 0.111; 95% CI, 0.045-0.271; P = 0.001), age (OR, 0.969; 95% CI, 0.940-0.998; P = 0.039) and the time from symptom onset to hospital admission (OR, 1.122; 95% CI, 1.025-1.228; P = 0.012) were significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with type A AAD presenting with CPA exhibited extremely high rates of death. Patient outcomes following in-hospital CPA tended to be better than those following out-of-hospital CPA; however, this difference was not significantly different. To prevent deaths, aortic surgery, when possible, should be considered in patients with type A AAD who sustained CPA.

Management of chronic Stanford type A aortic dissection combined with Neri type C coronary occlusion: a case report and literature review

While there are many reports on partial aortic root remodelling, it is rarely performed for chronic aortic dissection of the coronary artery. This case report describes a 71-year-old male patient with chronic aortic dissection who was admitted to hospital due to repeated palpitations and chest distress. He had a long-term occlusion of the right coronary artery and an abnormal origin of the left vertebral artery. A carefully planned surgical strategy was arranged for this patient, and the surgical experience is described and discussed herein. Briefly, the patient was treated by aortic root repair plus ascending aorta replacement plus Sun's procedure plus left vertebral artery graft implantation plus coronary artery bypass graft (right coronary artery to saphenous vein to innominate artery). At approximately 6 months following surgery, the patient had returned to normal living conditions without any reports of discomfort.

Sex-Based Difference in Aortic Dissection Outcomes: A Multicenter Study

Background: Type A Acute Aortic Dissection (TAAAD) repair is a surgical emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Registry data have noted several sex-specific differences in presentation with TAAAD which may account for the differences in men and women undergoing surgery for this condition. Methods: A retrospective review of data from three departments of cardiac surgery (Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Henri-Mondor University Hospital, San Martino University Hospital, Genoa) between January 2005 and 31 December 2021 was conducted. Confounders were adjusted using doubly robust regression models, a combination of regression models with inverse probability treatment weighting by propensity score. Results: 633 patients were included in the study, of which 192 (30.3%) were women. Women were significantly older with reduced haemoglobin levels and pre-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate compared to men. Male patients were more likely to undergo aortic root replacement and partial or total arch repair. Operative mortality (OR 0.745, 95% CI: 0.491–1.130) and early postoperative neurological complication results were comparable between the groups. The adjusted survival curves using IPTW by propensity score confirmed the absence of a significant impact of gender on long-term survival (HR 0.883, 95% CI 0.561–1.198). In a subgroup analysis of women, preoperative levels of arterial lactate (OR 1.468, 95% CI: 1.133–1.901) and mesenteric ischemia after surgery (OR 32.742, 95% CI: 3.361–319.017) were significantly associated with increased operative mortality. Conclusions: The advancing age of female patients alongside raised preoperative level of arterial lactate may account for the increasing preponderance among surgeons to perform more conservative surgery compared to their younger male counterparts although postoperative survival was similar between the groups.