Pulmonary Vein Isolation Versus Defragmentation

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients: an Updated Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

Age is a relevant risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with increased recurrence rates in the setting of rhythm control. Catheter ablation is increasingly advocated in elderly despite conflicting data regarding its efficacy and safety in this patient cohort. Therefore, we aimed to analyse currently available evidence regarding catheter ablation for AF in patients ≥ 75 years old compared with younger patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search and meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in patients ≥ 75 years old with AF. Primary efficacy and safety end points were first recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after first-time ablation and occurrence of death, stroke, or any procedure-related complication. Secondary outcomes included procedure and fluoroscopy time.

RESULTS

We identified 301 potentially relevant studies, of which 39 underwent detailed analysis. A total of 19 studies (MINORS score ≥ 13) reporting on 108,419 patients (101,844 < 75 years, 6,575 ≥ 75 years of age) undergoing first-time catheter ablation for AF were included. Risk of arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation (39% vs 32%, relative risk [RR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.41; P = 0.001) and occurrence of safety end points (10.8% vs 8.5%; RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.53-1.76; P < 0.00001) were significantly higher in patients ≥ 75 years of age than in younger patients. There was no difference concerning procedure (P = 0.33) or fluoroscopy time (P = 0.91) between younger and elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients ≥ 75 years of age, catheter ablation for AF has higher risk of arrhythmia recurrence and is associated with an increased risk of procedure-related complications and safety end point occurrence compared with younger patients.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation or Pace and Ablate in Elderly Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (ABLATE Versus PACE)-Rationale, Methods, and Design

Age is a major risk-factor for atrial fibrillation (AF) and associated hospitalisations. With increasing emphasis on rhythm control, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often suggested, even to elderly patients (≥ 75 years of age). Efficacy of PVI aiming at rhythm control is limited in persistent AF. Pacemaker implantation with atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation may represent a reasonable alternative, with the aim of controlling symptoms and improving quality of life in elderly patients. In this investigator-initiated, randomised, multicentre trial, we test the hypothesis that pacemaker implantation and AVN ablation provides superior symptom control over PVI in elderly patients with symptomatic persistent AF, without any increase in adverse event profile. In the ABLATE Versus PACE (NCT04906668) prospective open-label superiority trial, 196 elderly patients with normal ejection fraction and symptomatic persistent AF despite guideline-indicated medical therapy will be randomised to either cryoballoon PVI (ABLATE) or dual-chamber pacemaker implantation with subsequent AVN ablation (PACE), and followed for a minimum of 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome is a composite end point of rehospitalisation for atrial arrhythmia or cardiac decompensation/heart failure, (outpatient) electrical cardioversion, or upgrade to cardiac resynchronisation therapy owing to worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction to ≤ 35%. Secondary end points include death from any cause, stroke, quality of life, and procedure-related complications. Sample size is designed to achieve 80% power for the primary end point (2-tailed alpha of 5%). ABLATE Versus PACE will determine whether pacemaker implantation and AVN ablation can improve symptom-control in elderly patients with persistent AF over PVI without increasing safety end points.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of acupuncture assisted treatment for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Eight databases were searched. The search time limit is from January 2000 to November 2023. All randomized controlled trials on acupuncture treatment of AF were included. After the literature screening, data extraction and quality evaluation were carried out independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the included literature was analyzed by Meta using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

A total of 15 research studies on randomized controlled trials were included, involving 1960 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that acupuncture therapy could increase the sinus cardioversion rate of patients with AF, and the difference was statistically significant (relative risk = 1.21, 25% confidence interval (CI) [1.11, 1.31], P < .001). The clinically effective rate of the acupuncture plus drug treatment group was higher than that of the drug treatment group (relative risk = 1.32, 95% CI [1.19, 1.46], P < .01). Acupuncture plus other conventional therapies treatment was more helpful in reducing the ventricular rate of patients with AF (mean difference = -7.89, 95% CI [-14.52, -1.26], P = .006). The cardioversion time of patients with AF treated with acupuncture plus conventional therapies was shorter than those treated with traditional therapies alone (standardized mean difference = -1.82, 95% CI [-3.28, -0.35], P = .01). No severe adverse reactions such as hemorrhage, hematoma, or local infection caused by acupuncture were reported in the study.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence shows that acupuncture can effectively improve the total clinical effective rate and sinus rhythm recovery rate, shorten the recovery time of sinus rhythm, and reduce the ventricular rate, and there are no apparent adverse reactions. However, a limited number of studies may affect the generalizability of the findings. Future studies should include more extensive and diverse studies to enhance the power and generalizability of the findings.

Extensive ablation for elderly patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: insights from the EARNEST-PVI prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), extensive ablation for substrate modification, such as linear ablation or complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains controversial. Previous studies investigating extensive ablation have demonstrated its varying efficacy, suggesting the possible heterogeneity of its efficacy. Aging is a major risk factor for AF and is associated with atrial remodeling. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the extensive ablation strategy compared with PVI alone strategy between young and elderly patients.

METHODS

This study is a post-hoc analysis of the multicenter, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial investigating the efficacy and safety of PVI-only (PVI-alone arm) compared with extensive ablation (PVI-plus arm) in patients with persistent AF (EARNEST-PVI trial). We divided the overall population into 2 groups based on age and assessed treatment effects.

RESULTS

In the young group (age <65 years, N = 206), there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the PVI-alone group and PVI-plus group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.00, 95 % CI: 0.57-1.73, p = 0.987], whereas the recurrence rate was significantly lower in the PVI-plus group compared to the PVI-alone group in the elderly group (age ≥65 years, N = 291) (HR: 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.29-0.76, p = 0.0021) (p for interaction = 0.0446). There were no fatal procedural complications.

CONCLUSION

In patients with persistent AF, the extensive ablation strategy was more effective than the PVI-alone strategy in elderly patients, while the effectiveness of both approaches was comparable in young patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03514693. URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000022454 Unique ID issued by UMIN: UMIN000019449.

Extensive ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation patients with mitral regurgitation: Insights from the EARNEST-PVI prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Extensive ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not yielded consistent results, indicating diversity in their efficacy. Mitral regurgitation (MR) associated with AF may indicate a higher prevalence of arrhythmogenic substrate, suggesting potential benefits of extensive ablation for these patients.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis of the EARNEST-PVI trial compared PVI alone versus an extensive ablation strategy (PVI-plus) in persistent AF patients, stratified by MR presence. The primary endpoint of the study was the recurrence of AF. The secondary endpoints included death, cerebral infarction, and procedure-related complications.

RESULTS

The trial included 495 eligible patients divided into MR and non-MR groups. The MR group consisted of 192 patients (89 in the PVI-alone arm and 103 in the PVI-plus arm), while the non-MR group had 303 patients (158 in the PVI-alone arm and 145 in the PVI-plus arm). In the non-MR group, recurrence rates were similar between PVI-alone and PVI-plus arms (Log-rank P = 0.47, Hazard ratio = 0.85 [95%CI: 0.54-1.33], P = 0.472). However, in the MR group, PVI-plus was significantly more effective in preventing AF recurrence (Log-rank P = 0.0014, Hazard ratio = 0.40 [95%CI: 0.22-0.72], P = 0.0021). No significant differences were observed in secondary endpoints between the two arms.

CONCLUSIONS

For persistent AF patients with mild or greater MR, receiving PVI-plus was superior to PVI-alone in preventing AF recurrence. Conversely, for patients without MR, the effectiveness of extensive ablation was not demonstrated. These findings suggest tailoring ablation strategies based on MR presence can lead to better outcomes in AF management.

Subjective identification and ablation of drivers improves rhythm control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. The CHAOS-AF study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

The optimal approach for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains unknown. In patients with persistent AF, we compared an ablation strategy based on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) plus ablation of drivers (PVI+D), with a conventional PVI-only approach performed in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort.

METHODS

Drivers were subjectively identified using conventional high-density mapping catheters (IntellaMap ORION, PentaRay NAV or Advisor HD Grid), without dedicated software, as fractionated continuous or quasicontinuous electrograms on 1 to 2 adjacent bipoles, which were ablated first; and as sites with spatiotemporal dispersion (the entire cycle length comprised within the mapping catheter) plus noncontinuous fractionation, which were only targeted in patients without fractionated continuous electrograms, or without AF conversion after ablation of fractionated continuous electrograms. Ablation included PVI plus focal or linear ablation targeting drivers.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were included in each group (61±10 years, 25% women). Fractionated continuous electrograms were found and ablated in 21 patients from the PVI+D group (42%), leading to AF conversion in 7 patients. In the remaining 43 patients, 143 sites with spatiotemporal dispersion plus noncontinuous fractionation were targeted. Globally, AF conversion was achieved in 21 patients (42%). The PVI+D group showed lower atrial arrhythmia recurrences at 1 year of follow-up (30.6% vs 48%; P=.048) and at the last follow-up (46% vs 72%; P=.013), and less progression to permanent AF (10% vs 40%; P=.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective identification and ablation of drivers, added to PVI, increased 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia and decreased long-term recurrences and progression to permanent AF.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Elderly Patients ≥ 75 Years: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis With Focus on Differences Among Atrial Fibrillation Types

BACKGROUND

Age is a major risk factor for development of atrial fibrillation (AF) and associated with increased recurrence rates in the setting of rhythm control. Current data tend to support catheter ablation in elderly patients, but uncertainties exist regarding efficacy and safety of ablation in elderly patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective single-centre observational study with propensity score matching (PSM) to investigate the influence of age on efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) stratified by age (< 75 years vs ≥ 75 years) and AF phenotype (paroxysmal vs persistent). Primary efficacy endpoint was recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after a 90-day blanking period. Safety endpoints were death, stroke, or procedure-associated complications.

RESULTS

Consecutive patients (n = 953) underwent CBA for first-time AF ablation. Median follow-up was 18 months. By means of PSM, 268 matches were formed. At 1 year, primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 22.4% of young vs 33.2% of elderly patients, including both AF phenotypes (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.90; P = 0.01). AF relapse occurred in 19.7% of young vs 28.5% of elderly patients with paroxysmal (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.99; P = 0.046) compared with 25.9% (30 of 116, young) vs 38.8% (45 of 116, elderly) patients with persistent AF (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.97; P = 0.038). No difference was observed regarding the incidence of safety endpoints between young and elderly patients (P = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

CBA is associated with higher recurrence rates in elderly (≥ 75 years) than in younger patients, with highest recurrence rates in elderly patients with persistent AF.

Low-Voltage Area Ablation in Addition to Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Low-voltage area (LVA) ablation, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), has been proposed as a new strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but clinical trials have shown conflicting results. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the impact of LVA ablation in patient undergoing AF ablation (PROSPERO-registered CRD42024537696). Methods: Randomized clinical trials investigating the role of LVA ablation in addition to PVI in patients with AF were searched on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 22 April 2024. Primary outcome was atrial arrhythmia recurrence after the first AF ablation procedure. Secondary endpoints included procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and procedure-related complication rate. Sensitivity analysis including only patients with LVA demonstration at mapping and multiple subgroups analyses were also performed. Results: 1547 patients from 7 studies were included. LVA ablation in addition to PVI reduced atrial arrhythmia recurrence (odds ratio [OR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.81, p < 0.001) with a number needed to treat to prevent recurrence of 10. No difference in procedure time (mean difference [MD] -5.32 min, 95% CI -19.01-8.46 min, p = 0.45), fluoroscopy time (MD -1.10 min, 95% CI -2.48-0.28 min, p = 0.12) and complication rate (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.40-1.61, p = 0.54) was observed. Consistent results were demonstrated when considering only patients with LVA during mapping and in prespecified subgroups for AF type (paroxysmal vs. persistent), multicentric vs. monocentric trial, and ablation strategy in control group. Conclusions: In patients with AF, ablation of LVAs in addition to PVI reduces atrial arrhythmia recurrence without a significant increase in procedure time, fluoroscopy time, or complication rate.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Repeat ablation of atrial fibrillation using electrogram dispersion to identify additional areas of mechanistic significance

Background

Electrogram dispersion identifies putative atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers in first time ablation procedures, with high acute termination rates and long-term outcomes akin to extensive ablation approaches. Its use in a population that had undergone repeat ablation is unknown, particularly where the pulmonary veins are already isolated.

Objective

This purpose of this study was to assess electrogram dispersion mapping during repeat ablation procedures for persistent AF.

Methods

One hundred sixty-seven patients from the United Kingdom and Denmark, all with persistent AF recurrence after prior ablation procedure(s), were mapped using a five splined catheter for electrogram dispersion before ablation. Areas were manually tagged on biatrial electroanatomic maps and ablated once pulmonary vein isolation was confirmed or reisolated if required. All patients had 12-month continuous monitoring, with most of the cohort having follow-up beyond 24 months.

Results

Of the 167 patients [53 (32%) female; mean age 66 ± 8 years; mean left atrial (LA) diameter 4.8 cm; mean ejection fraction 53%], 108 had pulmonary veins already isolated. Dispersion sites occurred in both atria (3.2 LA, 1.4 right atrium). Acute termination to sinus rhythm occurred in 71 (42%) of the cohort patients, with a further 73 (44%) terminating to atrial tachycardia/flutter. At 12-month follow-up, 95% of patients were free of AF, with 74% overall freedom from all atrial arrhythmias. Heart failure and severely enlarged LA predicted recurrence, and termination to sinus improved freedom from all atrial arrhythmias.

Conclusion

Dispersion mapping is a promising approach at repeat ablation procedures for persistent AF, with high acute termination rates and good clinical outcomes. Further prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate this approach in a population that had undergone repeat ablation.

Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation versus cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PeAF) is a challenging case for rhythm control modalities. Catheter ablation is the mainstay in PeAF management; however, data regarding the comparative safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for PeAF is still limited. We aim to compare the safety and efficacy of CBA versus RFA for PeAF ablation.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through October 2023. RevMan version 5.4 software was used to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

PROSPERO ID

CRD42023480314.

RESULTS

Three RCTs with 400 patients were included. There was no significant difference between RFA and CBA regarding AF recurrence (RR: 0.77, 95% CI [0.50, 1.20], P = 0.25), atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter recurrence (RR: 0.54, 95% CI [0.11, 2.76], P = 0.46), and any arrhythmia recurrence (RR: 0.96, 95% CI [0.70, 1.31], P = 0.80). CBA was significantly associated with decreased total procedure duration (MD: - 45.34, 95% CI [- 62.68, - 28.00], P < 0.00001), with no significant difference in fluoroscopy duration (MD: 3.59, 95% CI [- 5.13, 12.31], P = 0.42). Safety parameters were similar in both groups, including the incidence of any complications, phrenic nerve palsy (RR: 2.91 with 95% CI [0.31, 27.54], P = 0.35), access site complications (RR: 0.33 with 95% CI [0.05, 2.03], P = 0.23), and pericardial effusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In PeAF catheter ablation, CBA is comparable to RFA in terms of safety and efficacy. Also, CBA is associated with a shorter total procedure duration.

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

Association of atrial mechanical dispersion with atrial fibrillation recurrence following catheter ablation: results of the ASTRA-AF pilot study

AIMS

For patients with symptomatic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF), catheter ablation to achieve rhythm control is an important therapeutic option. The atrial mechanical dispersion measured as standard deviation of the time to peak strain (SD-TPS) is associated with the risk of AF recurrence following catheter ablation.

METHODS

The study cohort prospectively enrolled n = 132 consecutive patients with paroxysmal (n = 88) or persistent AF (n = 44) presenting for de novo pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and followed for 1 year. We related left atrial (LA) volume, LA ejection fraction, SD-TPS, and global longitudinal strain of the left ventricle and clinical variables (sex, age, and type of AF) to AF recurrence.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier curves showed higher AF recurrence rate with an increase of SD-TPS with the calculated cut-off of 38.6 ms. Uni- and multivariable Cox regression analysis could show that SD-TPS had the highest relevance regarding AF recurrence with a HR of 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01; 1.09, p = 0.01) and HR of 1.05 (95% CI, 1.01; 1.09, p = 0.02) per 10 ms increase. In the additional analyses for the model including the clinical variables age, sex, and type of AF with paroxysmal or persisting AF, SD-TPS did only show a trend and after adjusting for covariates, SD-TPS showed a HR of 1.04 (95% CI, 0.99; 1.09, p = 0.09) per 10 ms increase.

CONCLUSION

Atrial mechanical dispersion was associated with recurrent AF.

Adjunctive Right Atrial Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation With Right Atrial Enlargement: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) is often associated with right atrial (RA) enlargement. We investigated the efficacy of RA intervention in patients with PerAF and RA enlargement.

METHODS

Patients with PerAF and RA enlargement were randomised (1:1) to receive adjunctive RA ablation (left atrial [LA] + RA group; n = 60) or to receive LA ablation alone (LA-only group; n = 60). In the LA + RA group, RA ablation was performed if LA ablation failed to terminate AF. The primary end point was freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence at 12 months after a single ablation procedure without antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

RESULTS

In the LA + RA group, 40 patients (67%) required RA ablation. The LA + RA group had a higher rate of acute AF termination than the LA-only group (63.3% vs 36.7%; P = 0.003). At the end of 12-month follow-up, 42 patients (70%) in the LA + RA group were free of AF/AT recurrence, compared with 31 (51.7%) in the LA-only group (log rank P = 0.034; hazard ratio 0.549, 95% confidence interval 0.310-0.974). The rate of freedom from AF recurrence was also higher in the LA + RA group than in the LA-only group (81.7% vs 63.3%; log rank P = 0.019). The 2 groups had similar rates of adverse events (5% vs 3.3%; P = 0.648).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive RA ablation increased the success rate of a single ablation in patients with PerAF and RA enlargement.

CHINESE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR220056844.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Triggers on Long-Term Outcomes of a Second Catheter Ablation of Nonparoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) triggers, including non-pulmonary vein (PV) foci, contributes to improved procedural outcomes. However, the clinical significance of an AF trigger ablation during second CA procedures for nonparoxysmal AF is unknown. Methods and Results: We enrolled 94 patients with nonparoxysmal AF undergoing a second CA. Intracardiac cardioversion during AF using high-dose isoproterenol was performed to determine the presence or absence of AF triggers. PV re-isolations were performed if PV potentials recurred, and if AF triggers appeared from any non-PV sites, additional ablation was added to those sites. We investigated the incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AAR) >3 months post-CA. Of the 94 enrolled patients, AF triggers were identified in 65 (69.1%), and of those with AF triggers, successful elimination of the triggers was achieved in 47 patients (72.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that no observed AF triggers were a significant predictor of AAR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-3.46, P=0.019). In a subanalysis of the patients with AF triggers, multivariate analysis showed that unsuccessful trigger ablation was significantly associated with AAR (HR 5.84, 95% CI 2.79-12.22, P<0.01). Conclusions: Having no observed AF triggers during a second CA session significantly increased the risk of AAR, as did unsuccessful CA of AF triggers.

Pulmonary vein capture is a predictor for long-term success of stand-alone pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Background

The mechanisms of AF development and progression are still not completely understood. Despite the relative efficacy of ablation, the risk of AF recurrence is substantial, particularly in patients with persistent AF (perAF). At present we do not have any reliable intra-procedural electrophysiologic predictors of long-term success of AF ablation other than pulmonary vein isolation. We evaluated selected intraprocedural pulmonary vein characteristics that may be helpful in future guidance of persistent AF ablation.

Methods

390 consecutive procedures using cryoballoon for initial AF ablation were divided by clinical presentation (paroxysmal or persistent AF), and by pulmonary vein (PV) response to pacing after completion of ablation (discrete electrogram elicited with pacing-"PV capture" or not-"Control"). Patients were followed (median 20 months) for recurrent atrial arrhythmias as the primary end point of the study.

Results

PV capture was identified in 20.3% and 17.1% and patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF respectively (ns). In patients with persistent AF presence of PV capture was associated with significantly better outcomes compared to patients without PV capture (p < 0.001). In the group "persistent AF and PV capture", an initial strategy of PV isolation and reisolation of the PVs (without additional lesions) for patients with recurrent atrial arrhythmias resulted in 20/23 (87%) patients in sinus rhythm off antiarrhythmic medications at study completion. In patients with paroxysmal AF, PV capture was not associated with outcome benefits. Specific electrophysiologic characteristics of PV (PV capture cycle length: PVCCL) did not have an impact on AF recurrence, although 25% shortening of PVCCL was observed after 60 s periods of pacing at short cycle lengths. No background demographic patient characteristic differences were identified between patients with vs. without PV capture.

Conclusion

The presence of PV capture was associated with better outcomes in patients with persistent AF. PV capture may identify those patients with persistent AF in whom cryoballoon PV isolation alone is sufficient as an initial ablation procedure and as the primary ablation strategy for recurrent AF.

The Influence of Different Multipolar Mapping Catheter Types on Procedural Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation

(1) Background: During pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF), multipolar mapping catheters (MMC) are often used. We aimed to compare the procedural outcomes of two MMCs, specifically a circular-shaped and a five-spline-shaped MMC. (2) Methods: We enrolled 70 consecutive patients in our prospective, observational trial undergoing PVI procedures for paroxysmal AF. The initial 35 patients underwent PVI procedures with circular-shaped MMC guidance (Lasso Group), and the procedures for the latter 35 cases were performed using five-spline-shaped MMC (PentaRay Group). (3) Results: No significant differences were identified between the two groups in total procedure time (80.2 ± 17.7 min vs. 75.7 ± 14.8 min, p = 0.13), time from femoral vein puncture to the initiation of the mapping (31.2 ± 7 min vs. 28.9 ± 6.8, p = 0.80), mapping time (8 (6; 13) min vs. 9 (6.5; 10.5) min, p = 0.73), duration between the first and last ablation (32 (30; 36) min vs. 33 (26; 40) min, p = 0.52), validation time (3 (2; 4) min vs. 3 (1; 5) min, p = 0.46), first pass success rates (89% vs. 91%, p = 0.71), left atrial dwelling time (46 (37; 53) min vs. 45 (36.5; 53) min, p = 0.56), fluoroscopy data (time: 150 ± 71 s vs. 143 ± 56 s, p = 0.14; dose: 6.7 ± 4 mGy vs. 7.4 ± 4.4 mGy, p = 0.90), total ablation time (1187 (1063; 1534) s vs. 1150.5 (1053; 1393.5) s, p = 0.49), the number of ablations (78 (73; 93) vs. 83 (71.3; 92.8), p = 0.60), and total ablation energy (52,300 (47,265; 66,804) J vs. 49,666 (46,395; 56,502) J, p = 0.35). (4) Conclusions: This study finds comparable procedural outcomes bet-ween circular-shaped and five-spline-shaped MMCs for PVI in paroxysmal AF, supporting their interchangeability in clinical practice for anatomical mapping.

Uplift modeling to identify patients who require extensive catheter ablation procedures among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Identifying patients who would benefit from extensive catheter ablation along with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) among those with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has been a subject of controversy. The objective of this study was to apply uplift modeling, a machine learning method for analyzing individual causal effect, to identify such patients in the EARNEST-PVI trial, a randomized trial in patients with persistent AF. We developed 16 uplift models using different machine learning algorithms, and determined that the best performing model was adaptive boosting using Qini coefficients. The optimal uplift score threshold was 0.0124. Among patients with an uplift score ≥ 0.0124, those who underwent extensive catheter ablation (PVI-plus) showed a significantly lower recurrence rate of AF compared to those who received only PVI (PVI-alone) (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19-0.84; P-value = 0.015). In contrast, among patients with an uplift score < 0.0124, recurrence of AF did not significantly differ between PVI-plus and PVI-alone (HR 1.17; 95% CI 0.57-2.39; P-value = 0.661). By employing uplift modeling, we could effectively identify a subset of patients with persistent AF who would benefit from PVI-plus. This model could be valuable in stratifying patients with persistent AF who need extensive catheter ablation before the procedure.

Dipole Density Guided Catheter Ablation versus Conventional Substrate Modification for Repeat Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

AIMS

The optimal ablation strategy for recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF) after initially successful catheter ablation (CA) remains debatable. Dipole density (DD) guided CA using the AcQMap system has been proven to be feasible and effective in patients with persAF. So far, long-term outcome data for DD-guided CA in patients with recurrence of persAF are sparse. This study sought to assess long-term outcome data in patients undergoing a DD-guided CA for recurrence of persAF after previous CA in comparison to conventional repeat CA.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients undergoing DD-guided CA for recurrence of persAF after previous ablation were compared to patients undergoing conventional substrate modification (CSM). A total of 64 patients (32 DD-guided and 32 CSM) were included in this analysis. Procedure duration (DD: 236 ± 61 min; CSM: 198 ± 59 min; p = 0.004) and fluoroscopy time (DD: 36 ± 15 min; CSM: 20 ± 11 min; p = 0.0001) were significantly longer in the DD group. After a long-term median follow-up (FU) of 27 months (interquartile range 12.8-34.3), DD-guided CA was inferior to CSM regarding overall arrhythmia-free survival (DD: 6 patients (19%), CSM: 11 patients (34%); HR 1.47; p = 0.04). Freedom from AF did not differ between both groups (DD: 16 patients (50%); CSM: 18 patients (56%), HR 0.99, p = 0.47). During FU, more patients underwent repeat CA after DD-guided ablation (DD: 16 patients (50%), CSM: 7 patients (22%), p = 0.04). No major complications occurred overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Dipole density-guided CA is equally safe but associated with longer procedure duration compared to conventional substrate modification for treatment of recurrent persAF after previous CA. Of note, long-term arrhythmia-free survival is significantly worse after DD-guided ablation, and more patients undergo redo procedures.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Current Practice and Future Perspectives

Catheter ablation to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is established as a mainstay in rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this review is to provide an overview of current practice and future perspectives in AF ablation. The main clinical benefit of AF ablation is the reduction of arrhythmia-related symptoms and improvement of quality of life. Catheter ablation of AF is recommended, in general, as a second-line therapy for patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent AF, who have failed or are intolerant to pharmacological therapy. In selected patients with heart failure and reduced left-ventricular fraction, catheter ablation was proven to reduce all-cause mortality. Also, optimal management of comorbidities can reduce AF recurrence after AF ablation; therefore, multimodal risk assessment and therapy are mandatory. To date, the primary ablation tool in widespread use is still single-tip catheter radiofrequency (RF) based ablation. Additionally, balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has gained prominence, especially due to its user-friendly nature and established safety and efficacy profile. So far, the cryoballoon (CB) is the most studied single-shot device. CB-based PVI is characterized by high efficiency, convincing success rates, and a beneficial safety profile. Recently, CB-PVI as a first-line therapy for AF was shown to be superior to pharmacological treatment in terms of efficacy and was shown to reduce progression from paroxysmal to persistent AF. In this context, CB-based PVI gains more and more importance as a first-line treatment choice. Non-thermal energy sources, namely pulsed-field ablation (PFA), have garnered attention due to their cardioselectivity. Although initially applied via a basket-like ablation tool, recent developments allow for point-by-point ablation, particularly with the advent of a novel lattice tip catheter.

Posterior Wall Isolation Improves Outcomes for Persistent AF With Rapid Posterior Wall Activity: CAPLA Substudy

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is less effective in persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) than in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the CAPLA (Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPLA randomized clinical trial) of PVI vs posterior wall isolation (PWI) did not support empiric PWI in PerAF. We examined pulmonary vein (PV) and posterior wall (PW) electrical characteristics to determine if select patients may benefit from additional PWI.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the impact of PV and PW electrical characteristics on AF ablation outcomes in the CAPLA randomized study.

METHODS

Participants in spontaneous AF at the time of ablation were included from the CAPLA study. The mean, shortest, and longest PV, PW, and left atrial (LA) appendage cycle length measurements were annotated preablation using a multipolar catheter for 100 consecutive cycles. Next, cardioversion was performed with a high-density LA voltage map completed. Cox proportional hazards regression was utilized to determine clinical and electroanatomic predictors of AF recurrence overall and according to ablation strategy. Follow-up included twice daily single-lead electrocardiograms or continuous monitoring for 12 months.

RESULTS

A total of 151 patients (27% female, age 65 ± 9 years, 18% long-standing PerAF, LA volume index 52 ± 16 mL/m2, median AF duration 5 months [IQR: 2-10 months]) were in AF on the day of procedure and were randomized to PVI alone (50%) or PVI+PWI (50%) according to the CAPLA randomized clinical trial protocol. Baseline clinical, echocardiographic, and electroanatomic parameters were comparable between groups (all P > 0.05) including PV and PW characteristics. After 12 months, freedom from AF off antiarrhythmic drug therapy was 51.7% in PVI and 49.7% in PVI+PWI (log-rank P = 0.564). Rapid PW activity was defined as less than the median of the shortest PW cycle length (140 ms) and rapid PV activity was defined as less than the median of the shortest PV cycle length (126 ms). In those with rapid PW activity, the addition of PWI was associated with greater arrhythmia-free survival (56.4%) vs PVI alone (38.6%) (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67-0.94; log-rank P = 0.030). Moreover, in those undergoing PVI only, the risk of AF recurrence was higher in those with rapid PW activity (55.3% vs 46.5% in slower PW activity; HR: 1.50, 95%CI 1.11-2.26; log-rank P = 0.036). Rapid PV activity and PV cycle length (individual PVs or average of all 4 PVs) were not associated with outcome (all P > 0.05) regardless of ablation strategy. There was no correlation between PW cycle length and posterior low voltage (r = -0.06, P = 0.496). The addition of PWI did not improve arrhythmia-free survival in subgroups with LA enlargement (LA volume index >34 mL/m2) (HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.39-1.25; P = 0.301), posterior low-voltage zone (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.68-1.66; P = 0.807), or long-standing PerAF (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.71-1.72; P = 0.669).

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid PW activity is associated with an increased risk of AF recurrence post-catheter ablation. The addition of PWI in this subgroup was associated with a significant improvement in freedom from AF compared with PVI alone. The presence of rapid PW activity may identify patients with PerAF likely to benefit from PWI.

[Long-term success after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation]

Ablation is an established treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with convincing success rates and a reasonable safety profile. Ablation strategies going beyond pulmonary vein isolation in patients with chronic forms of AF are less well established and reproducible. Especially in patients with progressed AF forms multiple ablation procedures might be mandatory to achieve reasonable clinical success. An early ablation strategy might stop or prolong the progress from paroxysmal to persistent AF. In addition, ablation is more effective than drug-based treatment and comparably safe. Long-term success rates after a single and after multiple ablation procedures in paroxysmal AF are reported with 60-70% and up to 80%, while success rates in persistent or long-standing persistent AF are less favorable (single procedure 40-50%, multiple procedures 70%). However, currently non-recurrence of AF is the most established but potentially not the best endpoint. The burden of AF after ablation as assessed by novel monitoring modalities might gain further clinical importance.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of Ibutilide-guided cardioversion and direct current synchronized cardioversion after radiofrequency ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

Backgroup

Ibutilide has already been used for cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Ibutilide-guided cardioversion on clinical outcomes after individualized ablation of PsAF.

Methods

From October 2020 to September 2021, consecutive patients with PsAF accepted for RFCA were prospectively enrolled. After individualized ablation including pulmonary vein isolation plus left atrial roof line ablation and personalized linear ablation based on left atrial low-voltage zones, patients were divided into the spontaneous conversion (SCV) group, direct current synchronized cardioversion (DCC) group and Ibutilide group according to different cardioversion types during ablation. The rates of freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATT) among the three groups were evaluated after follow-up.

Results

In this study, 110 patients were enrolled, including 12 patients with SCV, 50 patients receiving DCC and 48 patients receiving Ibutilide cardioversion after individualized ablation. Among the three groups, the SCV group had shorter AF duration {12 months [interquartile range (IQR) 12-16], P = 0.042} and smaller left atrial diameter (LAD) [35 mm (IQR: 33-42), P = 0.023]. A 12-month freedom from ATT rate was 83.3% in SCV group, 69.4% in DCC group, and 79.2% in Ibutilide group, respectively (Log-rank, P = 0.745). During the follow-up [17 months (IQR: 15-19)], the rate of freedom from ATT of SCV group (83.3%), and Ibutilide group (72.9%) were both higher than that of DCC group (53.1%, P = 0.042). Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly higher sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance in Ibutilide group than in DCC group (Log-rank, P = 0.041). After adjusting for risk factors of AF recurrence, the hazard ratio for AF recurrence of the DCC group with reference to the Ibutilide group was 4.10 [95% confidence interval (CI) (1.87-8.98), P < 0.001]. Furthermore, subgroup analysis showed that freedom from ATT rate in effective Ibutilide subgroup was significantly higher than noneffective Ibutilide subgroup (Log-rank, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

For the treatment of the patients with PsAF, Ibutilide-guided cardioversion after individualized RFCA may be benefit for maintenance of SR compared to conventional DCC, especially for the patients who are effective for administration of Ibutilide.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A review of techniques

Ablation of atrial fibrillation is a key area of current research. A multitude of techniques have been tested, some of which are poorly evidenced and not recommended in routine clinical practice whilst others are more promising. Additionally, a plethora of issues exist when researching ablation techniques, from control arm ablation strategy to the relevance of outcome measures. In this review article, we discuss these issues in the context of the current evidence base.

ECGI targeted ablation for persistent AF not responding to pulmonary vein isolation: Results of a two-staged strategy (TARGET AF2)

Background

Mechanisms sustaining persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remain unclear.

Objectives

The study sought to evaluate both the clinical outcomes and response to ablation of potential drivers in patients with recurrent persistent AF recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Methods

A total of 100 patients with persistent AF of <2 years' duration underwent cryoballoon PVI (ECGI phenotyping of persistent AF based on driver burden and distribution to predict response to pulmonary vein isolation). Patients with documented recurrence of atrial arrhythmia within 12 months were recruited and underwent repeat PVI (if needed) followed by ablation of potential drivers (PDs) identified by electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI). PDs were defined as rotational activity >1.5 revolutions or focal activations. Cycle lengths were measured pre- and postablation. The primary outcome was freedom from atrial arrhythmia off antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year as per guidelines.

Results

Of 37 patients recruited, 26 had recurrent AF and underwent ECGI-guided ablation of PDs. An average of 6.4 ± 2.7 PDs were targeted per patient. The mean ablation time targeting PDs was 15.5 ± 6.9 minutes. An ablation response occurred in 20 patients (AF termination in 6, cycle length prolongation ≥10% in 14). At 1 year, 14 (54%) of 26 patients were free from arrhythmia, and 12 (46%) of 26 were off antiarrhythmic drugs. Considering the 96 patients who completed follow-up out of the original cohort of 100 patients undergoing cryoablation in this staged strategy, freedom from arrhythmia at 1 year following the last procedure was 72 (75%) of 96, or 70 (73%) of 96 off antiarrhythmic drugs.

Conclusions

In patients with recurrent AF despite PVI, ECGI-guided ablation caused an acute response in a majority with reasonable long-term outcomes.

Temporal Trends and Lesion Sets for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis and Meta-Regression

BACKGROUND

Ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) has been performed for over 20 years, although success rates have remained modest. Several adjunctive lesion sets have been studied but none have become standard of practice. We sought to describe how the efficacy of ablation for PsAF has evolved in this time period with a focus on the effect of adjunctive ablation strategies.

METHODS

Databases were searched for prospective studies of PsAF ablation. We performed meta-regression and trial sequential analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 99 studies (15 424 patients) were included. Ablation for PsAF achieved the primary outcome (freedom of atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia rate at 12 months follow-up) in 48.2% (5% CI, 44.0-52.3). Meta-regression showed freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months has improved over time, while procedure time and fluoroscopy time have significantly reduced. Through the use of cumulative meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis, we show that some ablation strategies may initially seem promising, but after several randomized controlled trials may be found to be ineffective. Trial sequential analysis showed that complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation is ineffective and further study of this treatment would be futile, while posterior wall isolation currently does not have sufficient evidence for routine use in PsAF ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall success rates from PsAF ablation and procedure/fluoroscopy times have improved over time. However, no adjunctive lesion set, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation, has been conclusively demonstrated to be beneficial. Through the use of trial sequential analysis, we highlight the importance of adequately powered randomized controlled trials, to avoid reaching premature conclusions, before widespread adoption of novel therapies.

Characterization of high-density mapping in catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: results from the Advisor™ HD Grid Mapping Catheter Observational study

BACKGROUND

We quantified and characterized the outcomes of ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF) subjects, and the utility of electroanatomical mapping with a market-released high-density (HD) mapping catheter.

METHODS

PersAF subjects received electroanatomical mapping with the Advisor™ HD Grid mapping catheter, Sensor Enabled™ (HD Grid) and radiofrequency (RF) ablation to gather data regarding ablation strategies, mapping efficiency, quality, and outcomes. Subjects were enrolled from January 2019 to April 2020 across 25 international sites and followed for 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-four PersAF subjects (average age 64.2 years; 76% male; 25.4% previous AF ablation) were enrolled. Multiple map types were generated in a variety of rhythms using HD Grid. Significant differences in low voltage areas were identified in maps generated with the HD Wave Solution™ electrode configuration when compared to the standard configuration, which in some cases, influenced physicians' ablation strategies. PV-only ablation strategy was used in 59.0% of subjects and 34.1% of subjects received PV ablation and additional lesions. Of the subjects, 82.0% were free from recurrent atrial arrhythmias at 12 months and new or increased dose of class I/III antiarrhythmic drugs. About 6.0% of subjects experienced a serious adverse event or serious adverse device effect through 12 months including 1 event deemed related to HD Grid and the index procedure by the investigator and 1 death unrelated to study devices.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study (NCT03733392) support the safety and utility of electroanatomical mapping with HD Grid in subjects with complex arrhythmias, such as PersAF in the real-world setting.

Catheter Ablation for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: An Update of the Literature

Catheter ablation has been shown to be more effective at maintaining sinus rhythm and improving quality of life when compared to antiarrhythmic drugs. Radiofrequency and cryoablation are two effective methods. However, catheter-only ablation strategies have not consistently produced high success rates in treating longstanding and persistent AF patients. The emerging treatment of choice for such cases is hybrid ablation, which involves a multidisciplinary and minimally invasive approach to achieve surgical ablation of the direct posterior left atrial wall in combination with endocardial catheter ablation. Studies have shown promising results for the hybrid approach when compared with catheter ablation alone, but it is not without risks. Large and randomised studies are necessary to further evaluate these strategies for managing AF.

The spatiotemporal electrogram dispersion ablation targeting rotors is more effective for elderly patients than non-elderly population

Background

Modulating atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers has been proposed as one of the effective ablation strategies for non-paroxysmal AF (non-PAF). However, the optimal non-PAF ablation strategy is still under debate because the exact mechanisms of AF persistence including focal activity and/or rotational activity, are not well-understood. Recently, spatiotemporal electrogram dispersion (STED) assumed to indicate rotors in the form of rotational activity is proposed as an effective target for non-PAF ablation. We aimed to clarify the effectiveness of STED ablation for modulating AF drivers.

Methods

STED ablation plus pulmonary vein isolation was applied in 161 consecutive non-PAF patients not undergoing previous ablation. STED areas within the entire left and right atria were identified and ablated during AF. After the procedures, the STED ablation's acute and long-term outcomes were investigated.

Results

(1) Despite a more effective acute outcome of the STED ablation for both AF termination and non-inducibility of atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs), Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the 24-month freedom ratio from ATAs was 49%, which resulted from the higher recurrence ratio of atrial tachycardia (AT) rather than AF. (2) A multivariate analysis showed that the determinant of ATA recurrences was only a non-elderly age, not long-standing persistent AF, and an enlarged left atrium, which were conventionally considered as key factors.

Conclusions

STED ablation targeting rotors was effective in elderly non-PAF patients. Therefore, the main mechanism of AF persistency and the component of the fibrillatory conduction might vary between elders and non-elders. However, we should be careful about post-ablation ATs following substrate modification.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with a multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon; first and early two centre experience in Europe

INTRODUCTION

The Heliostar™ ablation system is a novel RF balloon ablation technology with an integrated three-dimensional mapping system. Here, we describe our early experience and procedural outcomes using this technology for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation.

METHODS

We sought to comprehensively assess the first 60 consecutive patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation using the novel HELISOTAR™ RF balloon technology including procedural outcomes. A comparison of the workflow between two different anaesthetic modalities (conscious sedation [CS] vs. general anaesthesia [GA]) was made. Procedural data were collected prospectively from two high-volume centers (Barts Heart Centre, UK and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich). A standardized approach for catheter ablation was employed.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients had the procedure under CS and the remaining under GA. Mean procedural and fluoroscopy times were 84 ± 33 min and 1.1 min. The median duration of RF energy application was 7 (5-9.8) mins per patient. All veins were successfully isolated, and the median isolation time was 10 (7-15) seconds. Our cohort's rate of procedural complications was low, with no mortality within 30 days postprocedure.

CONCLUSION

Our early experience shows that catheter ablation using the Heliostar™ technology can be performed efficiently and safely; however, long-term data is yet to be established. Low fluoroscopy requirements, short learning curves and use of this technology with CS is possible, including the use of an oesophageal temperature probe.

Multi-centre, prospective randomized comparison of three different substrate ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation

AIMS

The optimal strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) is poorly defined. We conducted a multicentre, randomized, prospective trial to compare the outcomes of different ablation strategies for PerAF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 450 patients and randomly assigned them in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo pulmonary vein isolation and subsequently undergo the following three different ablation strategies: anatomical guided ablation (ANAT group, n = 150), electrogram guided ablation (EGM group, n = 150), and extensive electro-anatomical guided ablation (EXT group, n = 150). The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) lasting longer than 30 s at 12 months after a single ablation procedure. After 12 months of follow-up, 72% (108) of patients in the EXT group were free from AF recurrence, as compared with the 64% (96) in the EGM group (P = 0.116), and 54% (81) in the ANAT group (P = 0.002). The EXT group showed less AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence than the EGM group (60% vs. 50%, P = 0.064) and the ANAT group (60% vs. 37.3%, P < 0.001). The EXT group showed the highest rate of AF termination (66.7%), followed by 56.7% in the EGM group, and 20.7% in the ANAT group. The AF termination signified less AF recurrence at 12 months compared to patients without AF termination (30.1% vs. 42.7%, P = 0.008). Safety endpoints did not differ significantly between the three groups (P = 0.924).

CONCLUSIONS

Electro-anatomical guided ablation achieved the most favourable outcomes among the three ablation strategies. The AF termination is a reliable ablation endpoint.

Treatment of pathophysiologic propagation outside of the pulmonary veins in retreatment of atrial fibrillation patients: RECOVER AF study

AIMS

RECOVER AF evaluated the performance of whole-chamber non-contact charge-density mapping to guide the ablation of non-pulmonary vein (PV) targets in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) patients following either a first or second failed procedure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

RECOVER AF was a prospective, non-randomized trial that enrolled patients scheduled for a first or second ablation retreatment for recurrent AF. The PVs were assessed and re-isolated if necessary. The AF maps were used to guide the ablation of non-PV targets through elimination of pathologic conduction patterns (PCPs). Primary endpoint was freedom from AF on or off antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) at 12 months. Patients undergoing retreatment with the AcQMap System (n = 103) were 76% AF-free at 12 months [67% after single procedure (SP)] on or off AADs (80% free from AF on AADs). Patients who had only received a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) prior to study treatment of non-PV targets with the AcQMap System were 91% AF-free at 12 months (83% SP). No major adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

Non-contact mapping can be used to target and guide the ablation of PCPs beyond the PVs in persistent AF patients returning for a first or second retreatment with 76% freedom from AF at 12 months. The AF freedom was particularly high, 91% (43/47), for patients enrolled having only a prior de novo PVI, and freedom from all atrial arrhythmias for this cohort was 74% (35/47). These early results are encouraging and suggest that guiding individualized targeted ablation of PCPs may therefore be advantageous to target at the earliest opportunity in patients with persistent AF.

A novel stepwise approach incorporating ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall for the ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation

Introduction

Apart from pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), several step-by-step procedures that aim to modify left atrial substrate have been proposed for the ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), yet the optimal strategy remains elusive. There are cumulative data suggesting an incremental benefit of adding vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion to PVI in patients with persistent AF. We sought to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a novel stepwise ablation approach, incorporating a VOM alcoholization step, for persistent AF.

Methods

In this single-center study, we prospectively enrolled 66 consecutive patients with symptomatic persistent AF and failure of at least one antiarrhythmic drug (ADD). The ablation procedure consisted of (i) PVI, (ii) left atrial segmentation with VOM ethanol infusion and the deployment of linear radiofrequency lesions across the roof and the mitral isthmus and (iii) electrogram-based ablation of dispersion zones. The first two steps were performed in all patients, whereas the third step was carried out only in those still in AF at the end of the second step. Atrial tachycardias during the procedure were mapped and ablated. At the end of the procedure, cavotricuspid isthmus ablation was additionally performed in all patients. The primary endpoint was 12-month freedom from AF and atrial tachycardia after a single procedure and an initial three-month blanking period.

Results

Total procedure time was 153 ± 38.5 min. Fluoroscopy time was 16 ± 6.5 min and the radiofrequency ablation time was 26.14 ± 0.26 min. The primary endpoint occurred in 54 patients (82%). At 12 months, 65% of patients were off any AAD. In the univariate Cox regression analysis, left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% was the only predictor of arrhythmia recurrence (HR 3.56; 95% CI, 1.04-12.19; p = 0.04). One patient developed a pericardial tamponade and another a minor groin hematoma.

Conclusion

A novel stepwise approach, including a step of ethanol infusion in the VOM, is feasible, safe and provides a high rate of sinus rhythm maintenance at 12 months in patients with persistent AF.

Long-term outcomes of left atrial appendage isolation using cryoballoon in persistent atrial fibrillation

AIMS

There is an increasing trend evaluating the role of non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers to improve ablation outcomes in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) as pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) strategy alone has modest outcomes. We investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage isolation (LAAi) in addition to PVI using cryoballoon (CB) in persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this multicentre retrospective analysis, we included a total of 193 persistent AF patients (mean age: 60 ± 11 years, 50.3% females) who underwent PVI and LAAi using CB. Baseline and follow-up data including electrocardiography (ECG), 24 h Holter ECGs, and echocardiography were recorded for all patients. Atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence was defined as the detection of AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia (≥30 s) after a 3-month blanking period. At a median follow-up of 55 (36.5-60.0) months, 85 (67.9%) patients with PVI + LAAi were in sinus rhythm after the index procedure. Ischaemic stroke/transient ischemic attack occurred in 14 (7.2%) patients at a median of 24 (2-53) months following catheter ablation. Multivariate regression analysis revealed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction [hazard ratio (HR) 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-5.02; P = 0.038], male gender (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.96; P = 0.037), and LA area (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.53-1.32; P = 0.023) as independent predictors of ATa recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that the LAAi + PVI strategy using CB had acceptable long-term outcomes in patients with persistent AF. Systemic thrombo-embolic events are an important concern throughout the follow-up, which were mostly observed in case of non-adherence to anticoagulants.

Mapping for nonpulmonary vein atrial fibrillation sources: The road to improved ablation outcomes

Since the publication of seminal work demonstrating ablation of AF triggers within the pulmonary veins, significant focus has been placed upon finding adjunctive AF mapping and ablation strategies to improve the targeted treatment of this arrhythmia. Presently, wide-area circumferential ablation to achieve pulmonary vein isolation has become the standard of care for catheter-based management. However, despite significant work, a comprehensive mechanistic understanding of the sustaining mechanisms of AF remains elusive. The present study from Nagase and colleagues provides important insight derived from a multielectrode catheter-based mapping algorithm regarding the spatial relationships between identified targets, regions of low voltage, and complex fractionated atrial electrograms. Being spatially distinct and distributed in both atria, they may represent novel targets for ablation therapy. Additional studies are required to better assess the impact of elimination of such foci.

Best Practice Guide for Cryoballoon Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation: The Compilation Experience of More than 1000 Procedures

Nowadays, the cryoballoon (CB) constitutes an established alternative to radio frequency (RF) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), which offers the possibility to isolate the PVs with a single application. Since the introduction of the second-generation CB, we prospectively collected our data to optimize the procedure on >1000 consecutive patients who underwent CB PVI performed in our center. It is expected that subsequent guidelines will suggest first-line PVI through CB in patients with paroxysmal AF with a class I indication. Indeed, in the long-term follow-up (36 months) of the EARLY-AF trial, CB had a lower incidence of persistent atrial fibrillation episodes compared to the anti-arrhythmic drugs group. We now review the current best practices in an effort to drive consistent outcomes and minimize complications. PV isolation through CB is the most studied single-shot technique for atrial fibrillation ablation, having shown the potential to alter the natural history of the arrhythmia. Several procedural tips and tricks can improve procedural flow and effectiveness. In the present article we provided not only technical details but measurable biophysical parameters that can reliably guide the operator into achieving the best outcome for his patients.

Efficacy and Safety Ablation Index-Guided High-Energy Linear Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: PVI Plus Linear Ablation of Mitral Isthmus and Posterior Box Isolation

BACKGROUND

For patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), whether linear ablation should be performed remains controversial, and the efficacy and safety for ablation index (AI)-guided high-energy linear ablation of mitral isthmus (MI) and left atrial (LA) posterior box isolation is still unclear. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and clinical success rate of pulmonary veins isolation (PVI) combined with linear ablation of LA roof and posterior inferior (posterior wall isolation) and MI compare with the PVI-alone method in patients of persistent AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

362 consecutive persistent AF patients were enrolled from two electrophysiology centers. A total of 200 cases were in PVI-plus group and 162 cases were in PVI-alone group. The PVI-alone group received wide circumferential isolation of both ipsilateral pulmonary veins. PVI combined with linear ablation of left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI)and MI were performed in the PVI-plus group. The primary study end point was the first recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia. After 24 months, freedom from the primary endpoint was achieved in 73.5% of the patients in the PVI-plus group and 62.5% in the PVI-alone group (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.91, log rank p = 0.012). The procedure-related complication rates were 2.5% in PVI-plus group and 1.9% in PVI-alone group (p = 0.808).

CONCLUSION

In this study, the ablation strategy of ablation (PVI plus linear ablation of mitral isthmus and posterior box isolation) was feasible and safe for persistent AF patients. Compared with the PVI-alone method, it improved outcomes in patients with persistent AF.

Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPLA Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is less effective in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with paroxysmal AF. The left atrial posterior wall may contribute to maintenance of persistent AF, and posterior wall isolation (PWI) is a common PVI adjunct. However, PWI has not been subjected to randomized comparison.

Objective

To compare PVI with PWI vs PVI alone in patients with persistent AF undergoing first-time catheter ablation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Investigator initiated, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 11 centers in 3 countries (Australia, Canada, UK). Symptomatic patients with persistent AF were randomized 1:1 to either PVI with PWI or PVI alone. Patients were enrolled July 2018-March 2021, with 1-year follow-up completed March 2022.

Interventions

The PVI with PWI group (n = 170) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation followed by posterior wall isolation involving linear ablation at the roof and floor to achieve electrical isolation. The PVI-alone group (n = 168) underwent wide antral pulmonary vein isolation alone.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary end point was freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia of more than 30 seconds without antiarrhythmic medication at 12 months, after a single ablation procedure. The 23 secondary outcomes included freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures, AF burden between study groups at 12 months, procedural outcomes, and complications.

Results

Among 338 patients randomized (median age, 65.6 [IQR, 13.1] years; 76.9% men), 330 (97.6%) completed the study. After 12 months, 89 patients (52.4%) assigned to PVI with PWI were free from recurrent atrial arrhythmia without antiarrhythmic medication after a single procedure, compared with 90 (53.6%) assigned to PVI alone (between-group difference, -1.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.73-1.36]; P = .98). Of the secondary end points, 9 showed no significant difference, including freedom from atrial arrhythmia with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (58.2% for PVI with PWI vs 60.1% for PVI alone; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.79-1.55]; P = .57), freedom from symptomatic AF with/without antiarrhythmic medication after multiple procedures (68.2% vs 72%; HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.80-1.78]; P = .36) or AF burden (0% [IQR, 0%-2.3%] vs 0% [IQR, 0%-2.8%], P = .47). Mean procedural times (142 [SD, 69] vs 121 [SD, 57] minutes, P < .001) and ablation times (34 [SD, 21] vs 28 [SD, 12] minutes, P < .001) were significantly shorter for PVI alone. There were 6 complications for PVI with PWI and 4 for PVI alone.

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients undergoing first-time catheter ablation for persistent AF, the addition of PWI to PVI alone did not significantly improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months compared with PVI alone. These findings do not support the empirical inclusion of PWI for ablation of persistent AF.

Trial Registration

anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12616001436460.

Reverse structural left atrial remodeling and atrial tachycardia in patients with repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation has been evolved to a cornerstone in the therapy of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, atrial tachycardias (AT) after AF ablation are still an important issue. Besides the electrical recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia after ablation, left atrial (LA) remodeling has received attention as a consequence of AF.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate predictors for AT recurrence and LA remodeling in patients with repeat AF ablation procedures.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred thirteen patients who underwent repeat AF ablation with 3D electro-anatomical mapping system were evaluated. Mean age was 63.1 ± 9.3 years, and 2.3 ± 0.5 ablation procedures were performed during a time period of 22 [IQR 7;48] months. Reverse structural LA remodeling (LA volume decreased more than 15%) was observed in 25 (22.1%) patients. LA volume index (LAVI) during first procedure was the only predictor for positive reverse structural LA remodeling (hazard ratio (HR): 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.07, p = .036) in multivariate analysis. Fifty-nine (52.2%) patients experienced only AF and 54 (47.8%) patients AT after first procedure. Female gender (HR: 5.21, 95% CI: 1.66-18.08, p = .006), LAVI (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11, p = .008) and LA scar percentage (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02-1.17, p = .019) were independent significant predictors for AT recurrence in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Reverse structural LA remodeling occurred in a quarter of patients with repeat ablation procedures for AF. Only larger LAVI during first procedure predicted reverse structural LA remodeling. Half of the patients experienced AT between first and last ablation procedure. Female gender, larger LAVI and larger scar area were significant predictors for AT after catheter ablation for AF.

Repeat ablation strategy for recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation: A propensity-matched score comparison between "2C3L" and "extensive ablation" approach

BACKGROUND

Debates exist in the repeat ablation strategy for patients with recurrence presenting as persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) after initial persistent AF ablation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcome between the "2C3L" and "extensive ablation" approach in patients undergoing repeat procedures for recurrent persistent AF.

METHODS

Propensity-score matching was performed in 196 patients with AF recurrence undergoing repeat ablation, and 79 patients treated with "2C3L" strategy were matched to 79 patients treated with "extensive ablation" strategy. The "2C3L" approach included pulmonary vein isolation, mitral isthmus, left atrial roof, and cavotricuspid isthmus ablation, while the "extensive ablation" strategy included extensive ablation of a variety of other targets aiming to terminate the AF. The primary outcome was freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia after 24-h ambulatory monitoring follow-up for 12 months.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference was found between the primary outcome between the "2C3L" and the "extensive ablation" group [70.9% vs. 69.6%, p = .862; 95% confidence interval (CI) -12.8 to 15.3], although the "extensive ablation" group had a significantly high proportion of AF termination (19.0% for "2C3L" vs. 41.8% for "extensive ablation" group, p = .002; 95% CI 8.5-35.9). And AF termination was not related to the primary outcome in multifactorial regression. At 40 ± 22 months after the repeat procedure, the primary outcome was also comparable (57.0 % for "2C3L" vs. 48.1% for "extensive ablation" group, p = .265; 95% CI -6.6 to 23.7).

CONCLUSION

The outcome between the "2C3L" and "extensive ablation" approaches was comparable in patients undergoing repeat procedures for recurrent persistent AF.

Complete Left-Atrial Lesion Set versus Pulmonary Vein Isolation Only in Patients with Paroxysmal AF Undergoing CABG or AVR

Background and Objectives: In patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing CABG or aortic valve surgery, many surgeons are not willing to open the left atrium to perform a complete left-sided Cox-Maze lesion set. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is often favored in those patients. We investigated the outcome of patients with isolated pulmonary vein isolation compared to those receiving an extended left atrial (LA) lesion set. Materials and Methods: Between 2003 and 2016, 817 patients received concomitant surgical AF ablation in our institution. A total of 268 patients with paroxysmal AF were treated by surgical ablation concomitant to AVR or CABG. Of those, 86 patients underwent a complete left-sided lesion set, while 182 patients were treated with an isolated pulmonary vein isolation. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial fibrillation at 12 months' follow-up. Results: There were no statistically significant differences regarding baseline characteristics. No major ablation-related complications were observed in any of the groups. In the PVI group, three patients (1.6%) had an intraoperative stroke, while two (2.3%) patients experienced a stroke in the LA ablation group (p = 0.98). In-hospital mortality was 3.4% in the PVI group, and 2.8% in the extended LA group (p = 0.33). Freedom from AF at 12 months' follow-up was 76% in the extended LA ablation group and 70% in the PVI group, showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.32). Conclusion: Surgical AF ablation concomitant to CABG or AVR in patients with paroxysmal AF is safe and effective. There was no statistically significant difference between the compared lesion sets in terms of freedom from AF, survival or stroke rate after 12 months.

Low-Voltage Myocardium-Guided Ablation Trial of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Clinically effective ablation approaches for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) are still being debated. So far, ablation targets and strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have failed to show systematic outcome improvement in randomized controlled clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to determine whether PVI plus individualized substrate ablation of atrial low-voltage myocardium improves outcome in patients with persistent AF. We randomly assigned 324 patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive PVI alone (163 patients; PVI only) or PVI plus substrate modification (161 patients; PVI+SM). The primary study end point was the first recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia longer than 30 seconds after single ablation, with 3 months blanking, using serial 7-day electrocardiogram recordings over 12 months of observation. Patients were also encouraged to receive implantable cardiac monitors. RESULTS: The primary study end point occurred in 75 PVI-only patients (50%) and in 54 PVI+SM patients (35%) (Kaplan–Meier event rate estimates: hazard ratio=0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.43 to 0.88, log rank P=0.006). Adverse events occurred in three PVI-only patients (1.8%) and in six PVI+SM patients (3.7%) (difference: −1.9 percentage points, 95% CI=−5.5 to 1.7 percentage points). Implant monitoring was used in 242 patients. Among them, 65 PVI-only patients (55%) versus 47 PVI+SM patients (39%) experienced recurrences (difference: 15 percentage points, 95% CI=3 to 28 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized trial, PVI plus individualized ablation of atrial low-voltage myocardium significantly improved outcomes in patients with persistent AF. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02732626.)

Validating left atrial fractionation and low-voltage substrate during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm-A high-density mapping study in persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Low-voltage-substrate (LVS)-guided ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has been described either in sinus rhythm (SR) or AF. Prolonged fractionated potentials (PFPs) may represent arrhythmogenic slow conduction substrate and potentially co-localize with LVS. We assess the spatial correlation of PFP identified in AF (PFP-AF) to those mapped in SR (PFP-SR). We further report the relationship between LVS and PFPs when mapped in AF or SR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with ablation naïve persistent AF underwent left atrial (LA) high-density mapping in AF and SR prior to catheter ablation. Areas presenting PFP-AF and PFP-SR were annotated during mapping on the LA geometry. Low-voltage areas (LVA) were quantified using a bipolar threshold of 0.5 mV during both AF and SR mapping. Concordance of fractionated potentials (CFP) (defined as the presence of PFPs in both rhythms within a radius of 6 mm) was quantified. Spatial distribution and correlation of PFP and CFP with LVA were assessed. The predictors for CFP were determined.

RESULTS

PFPs displayed low voltages both during AF (median 0.30 mV (Q1-Q3: 0.20-0.50 mV) and SR (median 0.35 mV (Q1-Q3: 0.20-0.56 mV). The duration of PFP-SR was measured at 61 ms (Q1-Q3: 51-76 ms). During SR, most PFP-SRs (89.4 and 97.2%) were located within LVA (<0.5 mV and <1.0 mV, respectively). Areas presenting PFP occurred more frequently in AF than in SR (median: 9.5 vs. 8.0, p = 0.005). Both PFP-AF and PFP-SR were predominantly located at anterior LA (>40%), followed by posterior LA (>20%) and septal LA (>15%). The extent of LVA < 0.5 mV was more extensive in AF (median: 25.2% of LA surface, Q1-Q3:16.6-50.5%) than in SR (median: 12.3%, Q1-Q3: 4.7-29.4%, p = 0.001). CFP in both rhythms occurred in 80% of PFP-SR and 59% of PFP-AF (p = 0.008). Notably, CFP was positively correlated to the extent of LVA in SR (p = 0.004), but not with LVA in AF (p = 0.226). Additionally, the extent of LVA < 0.5 mV in SR was the only significant predictor for CFP, with an optimal threshold of 16% predicting high (>80%) fractionation concordance in AF and SR.

CONCLUSION

Substrate mapping in SR vs. AF reveals smaller areas of low voltage and fewer sites with PFP. PFP-SR are located within low-voltage areas in SR. There is a high degree of spatial agreement (80%) between PFP-AF and PFP-SR in patients with moderate LVA in SR (>16% of LA surface). These findings should be considered when substrate-based ablation strategies are applied in patients with the left atrial low-voltage substrate with recurrent persistent AF.

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients: Limited Efficacy of Pulmonary Vein Isolation

(1) Background: Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation (cryoPVI) is established for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, but its value in persistent AF is less clear. In particular, limited data are available on its efficacy in elderly patients (≥75 years) with persistent AF. Age is an important modifier of AF progression and represents a risk-factor for AF recurrence. (2) Methods: Prospective, single-center observational study to evaluate the impact of age on efficacy and safety of cryoPVI in elderly patients. Primary efficacy endpoint was symptomatic AF recurrence after 90-day blanking period. Primary safety endpoints were death from any cause, procedure-associated complications or stroke/transient ischemic attack. Median follow-up was 17 months (range 3−24). (3) Results: We included 268 patients with persistent AF (94 ≥ 75 years of age). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified age as the only independent factor influencing AF recurrence in the overall cohort (p = 0.006). To minimize confounding bias in efficacy and safety analysis of cryoPVI, we matched younger and elderly patients with respect to baseline characteristics. At 24 months, primary efficacy endpoint occurred in 13/69 patients <75 years and 31/69 patients ≥75 years of age (24 months Kaplan−Meier event-rate estimates, HR 0.34; 95% CI, 0.19 to 0.62; log-rank p = 0.0004). No differences were observed in the occurrence of safety end points. (4) Conclusions: Elderly (≥75 years) patients with persistent AF undergoing cryoPVI had an approximately threefold higher risk of symptomatic AF recurrence than matched younger patients. Accordingly, other treatment modalities may be evaluated in this population.

Pulsed-field ablation-based pulmonary vein isolation: acute safety, efficacy and short-term follow-up in a multi-center real world scenario

PURPOSE

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a new energy source to achieve pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by targeted electroporation of cardiomyocytes. Experimental and controlled clinical trial data suggest good efficacy of PFA-based PVI. We aimed to assess efficacy, safety and follow-up of PFA-based PVI in an early adopter routine care setting.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent PVI using the Farawave® PFA ablation catheter in conjunction with three-dimensional mapping at two German high-volume ablation centers. PVI was achieved by applying 8 PFA applications in each PV.

RESULTS

A total of 138 patients undergoing a first PVI (67 ± 12 years, 66% male, 62% persistent AF) were treated. PVI was achieved in all patients by deploying 4563 applications in 546 PVs (8.4 ± 1.0/PV). Disappearance of PV signals after the first application was demonstrated in 544/546 PVs (99.6%). More than eight PFA applications were performed in 29/546 PVs (6%) following adapted catheter positioning or due to reconnection as assessed during remapping. Mean procedure time was 78 ± 22 min including pre- and post PVI high-density voltage mapping. PFA catheter LA dwell-time was 23 ± 9 min. Total fluoroscopy time and dose area product were 16 ± 7 min and 505 [275;747] cGy*cm². One pericardial tamponade (0.7%), one transient ST-elevation (0.7%) and three groin complications (2.2%) occurred. 1-year follow-up showed freedom of arrhythmia in 90% in patients with paroxysmal AF (n = 47) and 60% in patients with persistent AF (n = 82, p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

PFA-based PVI is acutely highly effective and associated with a beneficial safety and low recurrence rate.