Attainment of LDL-Cholesterol Treatment Goals in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The Current State of Its Implementation in Canada

Background

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common genetic disorder, yet it remains largely underdiagnosed in Canada. Multiple national and international guidelines recommend the use of clinical genetic testing for FH. However, the level of its accessibility and use within Canada is unclear. This study aims to describe the current state of clinical FH genetic testing in Canada and barriers to its implementation.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 23 genetic counsellors across 8 provinces, through the Canadian Association of Genetic Counsellors Cardiac Communities of Practice, to obtain information about the accessibility of genetic testing for FH and the use of genetic-counselling services.

Results

Responses were obtained from 12 genetic counsellors (52%). Of the 8 provinces surveyed, clinical FH genetic testing is available in 7, with British Columbia being the exception. The Simplified Canadian Definition for FH is the diagnostic criterion most commonly utilized to determine genetic-testing eligibility, and it is used in 5 of the 8 provinces. Notably, the referral rate to genetic counsellors typically is low, with most genetic-counselling programs receiving ≤ three referrals per site per month. Quebec is the only province to report a higher rate of genetic-counsellor referrals for FH.

Conclusions

Clinical FH genetic testing is not available widely in Canada and its implementation varies significantly by province; this includes the eligibility criteria to qualify for testing as well as the utilization of genetic counsellors. A harmonized national approach to FH diagnosis could improve the rates of diagnosis and treatment.

The Lipoprotein Profile Evaluated by 1H-NMR Improves the Performance of Genetic Testing in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

The familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) diagnosis is based on clinical and genetic criteria. A relevant proportion of FH patients fulfilling the criteria for definite FH have negative genetic testing. Increasing the identification of true genetic-based FH is a clinical challenge. Deepening the analysis of lipoprotein alterations could help increase the yield of genetic testing. We evaluated whether the number, size, and composition of lipoproteins assessed by 1H-NMR could increase the identification of FH patients with pathogenic gene variants.

METHODS

We studied 294 clinically definite FH patients, 222 (75.5%) with positive genetic testing, as the discovery cohort. As an external validation cohort, we studied 88 children with FH, 72 (81%) with positive genetic testing. The advanced lipoprotein test based on 1H-NMR (Liposcale®) was performed at baseline after a lipid-lowering drug washout of at least 6 weeks. The association of variables with genetic variants was evaluated by random forest and logistic regression. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were calculated. A predictive formula was developed and applied to the validation cohort.

RESULTS

A formula derived from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) lipoprotein analyses improved the identification of genetically positive FH patients beyond low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels (AUC = 0.87). The parameters contributing the most to the identification formula were LDL particle number, high-density lipoprotein size, and remnant cholesterol. The formula also increases the classification of FH children with a pathogenic genetic variation.

CONCLUSION

NMR lipoprotein profile analysis identifies differences beyond standard lipid parameters that help identify FH with a positive pathogenic gene variant, increasing the yield of genetic testing in FH patients.

Metformin-Induced Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibition Further Decreases Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Following Statin Treatment in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease and Without Diabetes

ABSTRACT

In vitro investigations have established metformin's capacity to downregulate proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) expression, suggesting a potential beneficial effect on atherogenic lipoprotein particles when combined with metformin therapy. Our objective was to assess whether metformin could mitigate statin-induced adverse effects on PCSK9, thereby improving lipid profiles in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) but without diabetes. Employing an open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized trial, we randomized patients with CAD but without diabetes into CLA (cholesterol-lowering agents alone: atorvastatin ± ezetimibe, n = 38) and Met + CLA groups (metformin plus CLA, n = 33) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary end point was the therapeutic impact of 1-month metformin combination treatment on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and PCSK9 levels. Baseline LDL-C and PCSK9 levels were 76.18 mg·dL -1 and 80.54 ng·mL -1 , respectively. After 1 month, metformin significantly reduced LDL-C (-20.81%, P < 0.001), enabling 72% of patients to attain guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. Noteworthy reductions in PCSK9 levels (-15.03%, P < 0.001) were observed. Moreover, Met + CLA markedly reduced LDL particle number more than CLA alone (-10.65% vs. 1.45%, P = 0.009), primarily due to diminished small-dense LDL particle count. Mechanistically, our study demonstrated metformin's inhibition of statin-induced PCSK9 expression in human hepatocellular cells. In summary, a 1-month metformin combination regimen reduced LDL-C levels in patients with CAD but without diabetes by inhibiting PCSK9 expression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry identifier: ChiCTR1900026925 (26/10/2019).

Association Between Patient Sex and Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk Factor Management 5 Years After Acute Coronary Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Long-term control of cardiovascular risk factors after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the cornerstone for preventing recurrence. We investigated the extent of cardiovascular risk factor management in males and females with and without familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) 5 years after ACS.

METHODS

We studied patients hospitalized for ACS between 2009 and 2017 in a Swiss multicenter prospective cohort study. FH was defined based on clinical criteria from the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network and Simon Broome definitions. Five years post-ACS, we assessed low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) levels, lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and other cardiovascular risk factors, comparing males to females with and without FH using generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

A total of 3139 patients were included; mean age was 61.4 years (SD, 12.1), 620 (19.8%) were female, and 747 (23.5%) had possible FH. Compared with males at 5-years post-ACS, females were more likely to not use statins (odds ratio, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.28-2.03]) and less likely to have combination LLT (odds ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.55-0.93]), without difference between patients with FH and without FH. Females in both FH and non-FH groups less frequently reached LDL-c values ≤1.8 mmol/L (odds ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.78-0.93]). Overall, patients with FH were more frequently on high-dose statins compared with patients without FH (51.0% versus 42.9%; P=0.001) and presented more frequently with a combination of 2 or more LLT compared with patients without FH (33.8% versus 17.7%; P<0.001), but less frequently reached LDL-c targets of ≤1.8 mmol/L (33.5% versus 44.3%; P<0.001) or ≤2.6 mmol/L (70.2% versus 78.1%; P=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Five years after ACS, females had less intensive LLT and were less likely to reach target LDL-c levels than males, regardless of FH status. Males and females with FH had less optimal control of LDL-c despite more frequently taking high-dose statins or combination LLT compared with patients without FH. Long-term management of patients with ACS and FH, especially females, warrants optimization.

Adherence to the 2018 AHA cholesterol management guideline in hyperlipidemia treatment among adults in an outpatient setting

Background

Although evidence-based guidelines and effective treatments exist for dyslipidemia, a significant disparity remains between guidelines and clinical practice. In this study, we investigated adherence to statin therapy per the 2018 ACC/AHA Guideline recommendations.

Methods

This is a retrospective, descriptive-analytical study involving 1,224 individuals who presented to the laboratories located in Birjand, Eastern Iran, from June 2022 to March 2023. Analyses were conducted on 700 patients. Data collection utilized a checklist and serum value measurements of laboratory factors deemed necessary for the study.

Results

Treatment was administered per the guidelines for 348 out of the 700 patients (49.7%). With 60.7%, the diabetes group exhibited the highest level of adherence to guidelines. In the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) group, 31.7% followed the recommendations. The lowest adherence rates were in groups with a 10-year ASCVD risk score of ≥20% and severe hypercholesterolemia, respectively (0% and 2.8%). In our study, atorvastatin was the most frequently prescribed statin, with the majority of patients consuming a moderate-intensity statin. None of the severely hypercholesterolemic patients achieved the LDL goal. Moreover, LDL-C goal achievement was low among the ASCVD group and those with an ASCVD risk score of ≥20%.

Conclusion

Patients with hypercholesterolemia adhere inadequately to the AHA Guideline. Consequently, training courses are needed to inform medical doctors, particularly general practitioners, of the latest dyslipidemia treatment recommendations as the AHA advises.

Comprehensive computational study in the identification of novel potential cholesterol lowering agents targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9

The enzymatic target proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) is critically involved in the regulation of the lipoprotein metabolism leading to the degradation of low-density lipoprotein receptors (LDLRs) upon binding. Drugs that lower LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) through the inhibition of PCSK9 are useful in the management of hypercholesterolemia which greatly reduces the associated risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). In 2015, anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), alirocumab and evolocumab were approved but owing to their high costs their prior authorization practices were impeded, reducing their long-term adherence. This has drawn considerable attention for the development of small-molecule PCSK9 inhibitors. In this research work, novel and diverse molecules with affinity towards PCSK9 thereby having ability to lower cholesterol. A hierarchical multistep docking was implemented to identify small molecules from chemical libraries with a score cutoff -8.00 kcal/mol, thereby weeding all the non-potential molecules. A set of seven representative molecules Z1139749023, Z1142698190, Z2242867634, Z2242893449, Z2242894417, Z2242909019, and Z2242914794 have been identified from a comprehensive computational study which included assessment of pharmacokinetics and toxicity profiles and binding interactions along with in-depth analysis of structural dynamics and integrity using prolong molecular dynamics (MD) simulation (in-duplicate). Furthermore the binding affinity of these PCSK9 inhibitory candidates molecules was ascertained over 1000 trajectory frames using MM-GBSA calculations. The molecules reported herein are propitious candidates for further development through necessary experimental considerations.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Circulating miR-6821-5p levels and coronary calcification in asymptomatic familial hypercholesterolemia patients

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a clinic characteristic of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Coronary calcium score (CCS) is a highly used imaging modality to evidence atherosclerotic plaque burden. microRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding RNAs that epigenetically regulate gene expression. Here, we investigated whether CCS associates with a specific miRNA-signature in FH-patients.

METHODS

Patients with genetic diagnosis of FH (N = 86) from the nationwide SAFEHEART-cohort were investigated by computed tomography angiography imaging and classified depending on the presence of coronary calcification in FH-CCS (+) and FH-CCS (-) groups by the Agatston score. Differential miRNA profiling was performed in two stages: first by Affymetrix microarray technology (high-throughput differential profiling-studies) and second by RT-PCR using TaqMan-technology (analytical RT-qPCR study) in plasma of the two patient groups.

RESULTS

miR-193a-5p, miR-30e-5p and miR-6821-5p levels were significantly higher in FH-CCS (+) compared to FH-CCS (-). miR-6821-5p was the best miRNA to discriminate FH-patients CCS(+), according to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (AUC: 0.70 ± 0.06, p = 0.006). High miR-6821-5p levels were associated with older age (p = 0.03) and high LDL-burden (p = 0.014) using a ROC-derived cut-off value. However, miR-6821-5p did not correlate with age in either the CCS- or CCS + group. Genes involved in calcification processes were identified by in silico analysis. The relation of cell-calcification and expression levels of miR-6821-5p, BMP2 and SPP1 was validated experimentally in human vascular smooth muscle cell cultures.

CONCLUSIONS

Up-regulated levels of miR-6821-5p are found in the plasma of asymptomatic FH-patients with coronary calcified atherosclerotic plaques, as well as in isolated human vascular smooth muscle cells expressing the pro-calcification genes BMP2 and SPP1. These findings highlight the impact of epigenetic regulation on the development of subclinical atherosclerosis.

Advances in familial hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a semi-dominant genetic disease affecting more than 25 million people worldwide, is associated with severe hypercholesterolemia and premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Over the last decade, advances in data analysis, screening, diagnosis and cardiovascular risk stratification has significantly improved our ability to deliver precision medicine for these patients. Furthermore, recent updates on guideline recommendations and new therapeutic approaches have also proven to be highly beneficial. It is anticipated that both ongoing and upcoming clinical trials will offer further insights for the care and treatment of FH patients.

Is there a role for earlier use of combination therapy?

As the global population ages and cardiovascular risk factors rise, we can expect a continued increase in atherosclerotic disease. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction is a cornerstone of cardiovascular risk reduction with strong, causal evidence indicating that the greatest benefit is derived from early and large decreases in LDL-C. Despite the adoption of statins as the backbone of lipid-therapy regimens, numerous studies and registry analyses reveal our collective inability to achieve LDL-C goals in high-risk patients. Combination therapy with ezetimibe has been shown to result in statistically significant decreases in LDL-C level, atheroma volume, and cardiovascular adverse event rates. A major barrier to implementing an upfront combination therapy approach is the perceived side effects from therapeutic agents although multiple studies show that a therapeutic patient-physician relationship could overcome this issue. Novel agents such as PCSK-9 inhibitors, bempedoic acid, and inclisiran have the potential to achieve similar outcomes although additional research is needed regarding the cost effectiveness of these approaches. Despite these hurdles, there is a role for the newer agents early in the disease course of high-risk patients such as those with markedly elevated LDL-C >190 mg/dL and FH. The implementation of upfront combination therapy, especially in high-risk patients, will decrease clinical inertia while allowing for earlier consideration of newer, effective agents to decrease cardiovascular burden.

Adherence to pharmacotherapy: sine qua non for reducing cumulative risk of premature coronary disease in familial hypercholesterolemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a dominant and highly penetrant monogenic disorder present from birth that markedly elevates plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol concentration and, if untreated, leads to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The risk of ASCVD can be substantially reduced with lipid-lowering treatment (LLT). However, adherence to LLT remains a major challenge in FH patients and an under-recognized issue. We review several barriers to treatment adherence and implementation strategies for improving adherence in patients with FH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Barriers that negatively affect patient adherence to treatment include the misunderstanding of perceived and actual risk of FH and the benefits of LLT, inadequate knowledge, lack of standardization of treatment, insufficient monitoring of LDL-cholesterol level, and inequalities in healthcare resources. Education of patients, carers and healthcare providers, guideline-directed treatment goals, regular monitoring, medication regimen simplification and greater access to established and new drugs are crucial enablers for improving adherence to treatment. However, given FH is present from birth, strategies for life-long adherence from childhood or young adulthood is critically important and requires further study. To be effective, strategies should be multifaceted, targeted and patient-centred involving a multidisciplinary-team with support from family, communities and peer groups.

SUMMARY

FH confers a significant risk for ASCVD from a young age. Achieving better medication adherence is foundational for improving clinical outcomes and reducing the burden of atherosclerosis over a lifetime. Identification of key barriers and enablers are critical for implementing better adherence to treatment across the life-course of patients with FH.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia in the Elderly: An Analysis of Clinical Profile and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Burden from the Hellas-FH Registry

BACKGROUND

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) carries a high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). As the population ages, the age-related influence on clinical characteristics and outcomes becomes increasingly pertinent. This cross-sectional analysis from the HELLAS-FH registry aims to explore potential differences in clinical characteristics, treatment, ASCVD, and goal achievement between those younger and older than 65 years with FH.

RESULTS

A total of 2273 adults with heterozygous FH (51.4% males) were studied. Elderly FH patients (n = 349) had a higher prevalence of ASCVD risk factors, such as hypertension (52.1% vs. 20.9%, p < 0.05) and type 2 diabetes (16.9% vs. 6.0%, p < 0.05), compared to younger patients (n = 1924). They also had a higher prevalence of established ASCVD (38.4% vs. 23.1%, p < 0.001), particularly CAD (33.0% vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001), even after adjusting for major ASCVD risk factors. Elderly patients were more frequently and intensively receiving lipid-lowering treatment than younger ones. Although post-treatment LDL-C levels were lower in elderly than younger patients (125 vs. 146 mg/dL, p < 0.05), both groups had similar attainment of the LDL-C target (3.7% vs. 3.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly FH patients have a higher prevalence of ASCVD, particularly CAD. Despite more aggressive treatment, the achievement of LDL-C targets remains very poor. These results emphasize the importance of early FH diagnosis and treatment in reducing ASCVD.

Safety of bempedoic acid in patients at high cardiovascular risk and with statin intolerance

BACKGROUND

Bempedoic acid is an oral adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor that lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) blood levels. The Cholesterol Lowering via Bempedoic acid, an ACL-Inhibiting Regimen (CLEAR) Outcomes study demonstrated that bempedoic acid reduced cardiovascular (CV) risk in patients at high risk for CV events who were unwilling or unable to take guideline-recommended doses of statins.

OBJECTIVE

To describe detailed safety information from CLEAR Outcomes, including events in the United States (US) prescribing information based on previous phase 3 hyperlipidemia studies.

METHODS

CLEAR Outcomes was a double-blind trial conducted in 13,970 patients randomized to oral bempedoic acid 180 mg daily or placebo and followed for a median of 3.4 years.

RESULTS

In patients who received at least one dose (7,001 bempedoic acid, 6,964 placebo), treatment emergent adverse events (AE) occurred in 86.3 % and 85 % of patients, respectively. COVID-19 was the most frequently reported AE in both groups. Changes in serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, hemoglobin, aminotransaminases, and uric acid were consistent with the known safety profile of bempedoic acid. Gout or gouty arthritis occurred in 3.2 % of bempedoic acid and 2.2 % of placebo patients. AE associated with tendinopathies, including tendon rupture, occurred in 2 % of patients in both treatment groups. Cholelithiasis occurred in 2.2 % of bempedoic acid and 1.2 % of placebo patients; AE related to gallbladder disease were similar between treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Bempedoic acid was well-tolerated compared with placebo. Safety data from the long-term CLEAR Outcomes study reinforce the positive benefit-risk profile of bempedoic acid.

Stratification in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Imaging, Biomarkers, and Genetic Testing

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) is the most common monogenic autosomal dominant disorder. However, the condition is often underdiagnosed and undertreated. The objective of this review is to provide an update on the risk stratification in patients with HeFH, incorporating new cardiovascular imaging techniques, various biomarkers, and genetic studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnosis of HeFH places patients in a high cardiovascular risk category due to the increased incidence of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. However, the level of risk varies significantly among different individuals with HeFH. Achieving an optimal stratification of cardiovascular risk is crucial for establishing appropriate and accurate treatment and management strategies. Different new tools such as risk scores have emerged in recent years, aiding physicians in assessing the risk stratification for HeFH using imaging, biomarkers, and genetics. This review emphasizes that not all patients with HeFH face the same cardiovascular risk. By utilizing different assessment tools, we can identify those who require more intensive monitoring, follow-up, and treatment.

Gaps in the Care of Subjects with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Insights from the Thai Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry

AIMS

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is currently underdiagnosed and undertreated. The establishment of a FH registry could facilitate a deeper understanding of this disease. We described the clinical characteristics of subjects with FH from the Thai FH Registry, compared our data with the regional and global data, and identified gaps in the care of these subjects.

METHODS

A multicenter, nationwide prospective FH registry was established in Thailand. Our data were compared with those of the European Atherosclerosis Society-FH Studies Collaboration. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed for variables associated with lipid-lowering medication (LLM) use and the attainment of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) goal.

RESULTS

The study includes 472 subjects with FH (mean age at FH diagnosis: 46±12 years, 61.4% women). A history of premature coronary artery disease was found in 12%. The percentage of LLM use in subjects with a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score of ≥ 6 (probable or definite FH) in our registry (64%) was slightly lower than the regional data but higher than the global data. Among those who received statins, 25.2% and 6.4% achieved LDL-C levels of ＜100 mg/dL and ＜70 mg/dL, respectively. Women with FH were less likely to achieve LDL-C ＜70 mg/dL (adjusted odds ratio: 0.22, 95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.71, p=0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

FH in Thailand was diagnosed late, and treatment was inadequate for the majority of subjects. Women with FH were less likely to achieve LDL-C goals. Our insights could potentially help raise awareness and narrow the gap in patient care.

International Atherosclerosis Society guidance for implementing best practice in the care of familial hypercholesterolaemia

This contemporary, international, evidence-informed guidance aims to achieve the greatest good for the greatest number of people with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) across different countries. FH, a family of monogenic defects in the hepatic LDL clearance pathway, is a preventable cause of premature coronary artery disease and death. Worldwide, 35 million people have FH, but most remain undiagnosed or undertreated. Current FH care is guided by a useful and diverse group of evidence-based guidelines, with some primarily directed at cholesterol management and some that are country-specific. However, none of these guidelines provides a comprehensive overview of FH care that includes both the lifelong components of clinical practice and strategies for implementation. Therefore, a group of international experts systematically developed this guidance to compile clinical strategies from existing evidence-based guidelines for the detection (screening, diagnosis, genetic testing and counselling) and management (risk stratification, treatment of adults or children with heterozygous or homozygous FH, therapy during pregnancy and use of apheresis) of patients with FH, update evidence-informed clinical recommendations, and develop and integrate consensus-based implementation strategies at the patient, provider and health-care system levels, with the aim of maximizing the potential benefit for at-risk patients and their families worldwide.

LDL cholesterol targets rarely achieved in familial hypercholesterolemia patients: A sex and gender-specific analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite lipid lowering therapy (LLT), reaching LDL-C targets in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) remains challenging. Our aim was to determine attainment of LDL-C target levels and reasons for not reaching these in female and male FH patients.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of heterozygous FH patients in five hospitals in the Netherlands and Norway. Clinical characteristics and information about LLT, lipid levels and reasons for not being on LDL-C treatment target were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records.

RESULTS

We studied 3178 FH patients (53.9% women), median age 48.0 (IQR 34.0-59.9) years. Median LDL-C before treatment and on-treatment was higher in women compared to men (6.2 (IQR 5.1-7.3) and 6.0 (IQR 4.9-7.2) mmol/l (p=0.005) and 3.0 (IQR 2.4-3.8) and 2.8 (IQR 2.3-3.5) mmol/L (p<0.001)), respectively. A minority of women (26.9%) and men (28.9%) reached LDL-C target. In patients with CVD, 17.2% of women and 25.8% of men reached LDL-C target. Women received less often high-intensity statins and ezetimibe. Most common reported reasons for not achieving the LDL-C target were insufficient effect of maximum LLT (women 17.3%, men 24.3%) and side effects (women 15.2%, men 8.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

In routine practice, only a minority of women and men with FH achieved their LDL-C treatment target. Extra efforts have to be made to provide FH patients with reliable information on the safety of statins and their long-term effects on CVD risk reduction. If statin treatment is insufficient, alternative lipid lowering therapies such as ezetimibe or PCSK9-inhibitors should be considered.

Misperceptions and management of LDL-cholesterol in secondary prevention of patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in cardiology practice: Real-life evidence from the EPHESUS registry

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common inherited disease, leading to premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) due to elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. Achieving LDL-C goals is extremely important for preventing the complications of this fatal disease. We evaluated the management of FH patients with ASCVD in cardiology practice.

METHODS

We analyzed patients with ASCVD from the nationwide EPHESUS registry, which was conducted in 40 cardiology outpatient clinics, and compared those with and without FH.

RESULTS

Of the 1482 consecutively enrolled patients with ASCVD, 618 (41.7%) had FH, among which 455 were categorized as 'Possible FH' and 163 as 'Probable or Definite FH'. Proposed LDL-C goals were not attained in more than 90% of the patients with FH. The proportion of those on statin therapy was 77% for possible and 91% for probable or definite FH, whereas 34.2 % and 59.4% were in use of high-intensity statins, respectively. None of the patients were on PCSK-9 inhibitors, and only 2 used ezetimibe. Adverse media coverage was the most common cause of statin discontinuation (32.5% in 'possible FH' and 45.7% in 'probable/definite FH'). The negative impact of media in the decision to stop lipid lowering therapy (LLT) was increasing with education level.

CONCLUSIONS

In real life most of the FH patients with ASCVD are undertreated in cardiology practice regarding statin dosing and combined LLT. Drug discontinuation rates are notably high and are mostly media-related, and side effects very rarely cause cessation of LLT. Urgent measures are needed to increase the awareness of FH among healthcare providers and patients and to develop improved treatment strategies aimed at preventing the complications of FH.

Treatment target achievement in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: A real-world descriptive study

BACKGROUND

Statin and ezetimibe represent the first line of lipid-lowering therapy in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a disease associated with a strong cardiovascular risk. The current low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) target achievement rate in a real-world context using these conventional treatments has never been investigated in the Province of Quebec (Canada).

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the proportion of FH patients in primary cardiovascular prevention who attained their recommended LDL-C threshold without being treated with a PCSK9 inhibitor.

METHODS

Patients included in this retrospective study were followed at the Lipid Clinic of the Montreal Clinical Research Institute. All patients were molecularly defined (97%) or had a definite clinical diagnosis of FH.

RESULTS

A total of 225 patients were included in this study, of which 73% were on high-intensity statin therapy. While two-thirds of the cohort achieved the LDL-C treatment target of ≥ 50% reduction from baseline, only one third attained the target of < 2.5  mmol/L (<97 mg/dL). However, patients on high-intensity statin therapy were two times more likely to achieve the < 2.5  mmol/L targets as compared to those treated with low or moderate statin intensity (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in treatment target achievement between men and women.

CONCLUSION

Target achievement rate was unacceptably low in our FH patients. Conventional lipid-lowering treatments alone may not be sufficient in most FH patients to ensure adequate cardiovascular prevention.

High-Throughput Microscopy Characterization of Rare LDLR Variants

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common inherited life-threatening disorder of lipid metabolism. Early diagnosis and treatment are the key to reduce the cumulative life-long cardiovascular burden of patients with FH. The high number of LDLR variants described as variants of unknown significance is the largest obstacle to achieve a definitive FH diagnosis. This study established a time- and cost-effective high-throughput cell-based assay to functionally profile LDLR variants, which allowed us to discriminate disruptive rare variants from silent ones. This work generated a valuable resource for systematic functional characterization of LDLR variants solving 1 of the major issues to achieve a definitive FH diagnosis.

Recent advances in the management and implementation of care for familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common autosomal semi-dominant and highly penetrant disorder of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor pathway, characterised by lifelong elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). However, many patients with FH are not diagnosed and do not attain recommended LDL-C goals despite maximally tolerated doses of potent statin and ezetimibe. Over the past decade, several cholesterol-lowering therapies such as those targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) or angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) with monoclonal antibody or ribonucleic acid (RNA) approaches have been developed that promise to close the treatment gap. The availability of new therapies with complementary modes of action of lipid metabolism has enabled many patients with FH to attain guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. Emerging therapies for FH include liver-directed gene transfer of the LDLR, vaccines targeting key proteins involved in cholesterol metabolism, and CRISPR-based gene editing of PCSK9 and ANGPTL3, but further clinical trials are required. In this review, current and emerging treatment strategies for lowering LDL-C, and ASCVD risk-stratification, as well as implementation strategies for the care of patients with FH are reviewed.

Novel LDLR Variant in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: NGS-Based Identification, In Silico Characterization, and Pharmacogenetic Insights

BACKGROUND

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a hereditary condition that causes a rise in blood cholesterol throughout a person's life. FH can result in myocardial infarction and even sudden death if not treated. FH is thought to be caused mainly by variants in the gene for the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR). This study aimed to investigate the genetic variants in FH patients, verify their pathogenicity, and comprehend the relationships between genotype and phenotype. Also, review studies assessed the relationship between the LDLR null variants and the reaction to lipid-lowering therapy.

METHODS

The study utilised high-throughput next-generation sequencing for genetic screening of FH-associated genes and capillary sequencing for cascade screening. Furthermore, bioinformatic analysis was employed to describe the pathogenic effects of the revealed novel variant on the structural features of the corresponding RNA molecule.

RESULTS

We studied the clinical signs of hypercholesterolemia in a Saudi family with three generations of FH. We discovered a novel frameshift variant (c.666_670dup, p.(Asp224Alafs*43) in the LDLR and a known single nucleotide variant (c.9835A > G, p.(Ser3279Gly) in the APOB gene. It is thought that the LDLR variant causes a protein to be prematurely truncated, likely through nonsense-mediated protein decay. The LDLR variant is strongly predicted to be pathogenic in accordance with ACMG guidelines and co-segregated with the FH clinical characteristics of the family. This LDLR variant exhibited severe clinical FH phenotypes and was restricted to the LDLR protein's ligand-binding domain. According to computational functional characterization, this LDLR variant was predicted to change the free energy dynamics of the RNA molecule, thereby affecting its stability. This frameshift variant is thought to eliminate important functional domains in LDLR that are required for receptor recycling and LDL particle binding. We provide insight into how FH patients with a null variant in the LDLR gene respond to lipid-lowering therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings expand the range of FH variants and assist coronary artery disease preventive efforts by improving diagnosis, understanding the genotype-phenotype relationship, prognosis, and personalised therapy for patients with FH.

Real-World Attainment of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Goals in Patients at High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease Treated with High-Intensity Statins: The TERESA Study

Despite steady improvements in cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, a scarce proportion of patients achieve the recommended LDL-C goals, even under high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Our study aimed to evaluate the attainment rate of LDL-C targets recommended by the 2019 European guidelines, and to characterize potential factors associated with LDL-C goal achievement and change patterns in LLT. We conducted a retrospective, observational study on patients treated with high-intensity atorvastatin or rosuvastatin ± ezetimibe at cardiology and internal medicine clinics across Spain. It included 1570 evaluable patients (median age: 62 years; established CVD: 77.5% [myocardial infarction: 34.3%]; and 85.8% at very high cardiovascular risk). Rosuvastatin ± ezetimibe was the LLT in 52.2% of patients, and atorvastatin ± ezetimibe in 47.8%. LLT had been modified in 36.8% of patients (side effects: 10%), being the most common switch from atorvastatin- to rosuvastatin-based treatment (77.2%). The risk-based LDL-C goal attainment rate was 31.1%, with 78.2% high-risk and 71.7% very high-risk patients not achieving the recommended LDL-C targets. Established CVD and familial hypercholesterolemia were significantly associated with the non-achievement of LDL-C goals. Although having limitations, this study shows that the guideline-recommended LDL-C goal attainment rate is still suboptimal despite using high-intensity statin therapy in a real-world setting in Spain.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Challenges for a High-Risk Population: JACC Focus Seminar 1/3

The availability of statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors has significantly improved the prognosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). However, a great number of individuals with FH do not achieve guideline-recommended low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels despite maximal lipid-lowering therapy. Novel therapies that lower LDL independent of LDL receptor activity can help mitigate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in most homozygous FH and many heterozygous FH patients. However, access to novel therapies remains limited for heterozygous FH patients with persistent elevation of LDL cholesterol despite treatment with multiple classes of cholesterol-lowering therapies. Conduction of cardiovascular outcomes clinical trials in patients with FH can be challenging because of difficulty in recruitment and long periods of follow-up. In the future, the use of validated surrogate measures of atherosclerosis may allow for clinical trials with fewer study participants and shorter duration, thereby expediting access to novel treatments for patients with FH.

Genetic Testing in Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Is It for Everyone?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipid measurements and genetic testing are the main diagnostic tools for FH screening that are available in many countries. A lipid profile is widely accessible, and genetic testing, although available worldwide, in some countries is only performed in a research context. Still FH is diagnosed late, showing lack of early screening programs worldwide.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pediatric screening of FH was recently recognized by the European Commission Public Health Best Practice Portal as one on the best practices in non-communicable disease prevention. The early diagnosis of FH and the lowering of LDL-C values over lifespan can reduce the risk of coronary artery disease and offer health and socioeconomic gains. Current knowledge about FH shows that early detection through appropriate screening needs to become a priority in healthcare systems worldwide. Governmental programs for FH identification should be implemented to unify the diagnosis and increase patient identification.

Persistence with long-term PCSK9 inhibitor treatment and its effectiveness in familial hypercholesterolaemia: data from the SAFEHEART study

AIMS

Most heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) patients require intensive lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) including PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9is) to reach current low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Persistence with chronic treatment is important to reduce the burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. We analysed persistence, efficacy, and impact on quality of life (QoL) of PCSK9i in FH patients in clinical practice setting.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Spanish Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Cohort Study (SAFEHEART) is an open, prospective study in genetically defined FH patients in Spain. Patients ≥18 years of age (n = 696, 46% females) on stable LLT treated with PCSK9i were analysed. Median LDL-C at starting PCSK9i was 145 mg/dL [interquartile range (IQR), 123-177], 3.8 mmol/L (IQR 3.2-4.6). After a median follow up of 3.7 years (IQR 2.3-4.8), 27 patients (4%) discontinued PCSK9i treatment: 5 temporarily (0.7%) and 22 permanently (3.2%). Persistence with PCSK9i was 96.1% in the whole period. Median LDL-C levels and % LDL-C reduction attained after 1 year of treatment and in the last follow-up visit were 63 mg/dL (IQR 43-88), 1.6 mmol/L (IQR 1.1-2.23); 61 mg/dL (IQR 44-82), 1.6 mmol/L (IQR 1.1-2.1); 57.6% (IQR 39.5-69); and 58% (IQR 44-68), respectively. 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS LDL-C goals were attained by 77 and 48% of patients, respectively, at the last follow-up visit (P < 0.001). Mean QoL score increased slightly in the first year and remained stable.

CONCLUSION

Long-term persistence with PCSK9i in FH patients is very high, with a good QoL. Effectiveness in LDL-C reduction and LDL-C goal achievement dramatically improved with PCSK9i in this high-risk population in clinical practice setting.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02693548.

The prevalence and treatment patterns of familial hypercholesterolemia among Thai patients with premature coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVES

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder that is characterized by severe hypercholesterolemia. The prevalence of FH in Thailand has not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the prevalence of FH and treatment patterns among Thai patients with premature coronary artery disease (pCAD).

METHODS

A total of 1,180 pCAD patients at two heart centers from northeastern and southern Thailand between October 2018 and September 2020 were enrolled. FH was diagnosed using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria. pCAD was diagnosed in men aged < 55 years and women aged < 60 years.

RESULTS

The prevalence of definite/probable FH, possible FH, and unlikely FH in pCAD patients was 1.36% (n = 16), 24.83% (n = 293), and 73.81% (n = 871), respectively. Definite/probable FH in pCAD patients had a significantly higher frequency of STEMI but a lower frequency of hypertension than those with unlikely FH. After discharge, most pCAD patients (95.51%) received statin therapy. Definite/probable FH patients had a higher frequency of high-intensity statin therapy than those with possible FH and unlikely FH. After follow-up for 3-6 months, approximately 54.72% of pCAD patients with DLCN scores ≥ 5 had a reduction in LDL-C > 50% from baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of definite/probable FH, particularly possible FH, was high among pCAD patients in this study. The early diagnosis of FH among Thai pCAD patients should be performed for the early treatment and prevention of CAD.

Opportunistic Genetic Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Heart Transplant Patients

Heart transplantation remains the gold standard for the treatment of advanced heart failure (HF). Identification of the etiology of HF is mandatory, as the specific pathology can determine subsequent treatment. Early identification of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), the most common genetic disorder associated with premature cardiovascular disease, has a potential important impact on clinical management and public health. We evaluated the genetic information in the genes associated with FH in a cohort of 140 heart-transplanted patients. All patients underwent NGS genetic testing including LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9. We identified four carriers of rare pathogenic variants in LDLR and APOB. Although all four identified carriers had dyslipidemia, only the one carrying the pathogenic variant LDLR c.676T>C was transplanted due to CAD. Another patient with heart valvular disease was carrier of the controversial LDLR c.2096C>T. Two additional patients with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy were carriers of variants in APOB (c.4672A>G and c.5600G>A). In our cohort, we identified the genetic cause of FH in patients that otherwise would not have been diagnosed. Opportunistic genetic testing for FH provides important information to perform personalized medicine and risk stratification not only for patients but also for relatives at concealed high cardiovascular risk. Including the LDLR gene in standard NGS cardiovascular diagnostics panels should be considered.

Clinical Evaluation of Patients with Genetically Confirmed Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common genetic disorder associated with premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease (ASCVD). However, it still is severely underdiagnosed. Initiating lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) in FH patients early in life can substantially reduce their ASCVD risk. As a result, identifying FH is of the utmost importance. The increasing availability of genetic testing may be useful in this regard. We aimed to evaluate the genetic profiles, clinical characteristics, and gender differences between the first consecutive patients referred for genetic testing with FH clinical suspicion in our institution (a Spanish cohort). Clinical information was reviewed, and all participants were sequenced for the main known genes related to FH: LDLR, APOB, PCSK9 (heterozygous FH), LDLRAP1 (autosomal recessive FH), and two other genes related to hyperlipidaemia (APOE and LIPA). The genetic yield was 32%. Their highest recorded LDLc levels were 294 ± 65 SD mg. However, most patients (79%) were under > 1 LLT medication, and their last mean LDLc levels were 135 ± 51 SD. LDLR c.2389+4A>G was one of the most frequent pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and its carriers had significantly worse LDLc highest recorded levels (348 ± 61 SD vs. 282 ± 60 SD mg/dL, p = 0.002). Moreover, we identified an homozygous carrier of the pathogenic variant LDLRAP1 c.207delC (autosomal recessive FH). Both clinical and genetic hypercholesterolemia diagnosis was significantly established earlier in men than in women (25 years old ± 15 SD vs. 35 years old ± 19 SD, p = 0.02; and 43 ± 17 SD vs. 54 ± 19 SD, p = 0.02, respectively). Other important CV risk factors were found in 44% of the cohort. The prevalence of family history of premature ASCVD was high, whereas personal history was exceptional. Our finding reaffirms the importance of early detection of FH to initiate primary prevention strategies from a young age. Genetic testing can be very useful. As it enables familial cascade genetic testing, early prevention strategies can be extended to all available relatives at concealed high CV risk.

Familial Hypercholesterolemia Among Young Adults With Acute Coronary Syndrome

There are limited data on the prevalence and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) among Israeli adults who experience premature acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to assess the prevalence of FH among young Israeli adults with ACS, examine the rates of lipid-lowering therapy administration, and determine low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels 1 year after ACS. Patients aged ≤55 years hospitalized for ACS at Meir Medical Center between 2018 and 2019 were included. Probable/definite FH was defined using the Dutch Lipid Clinic criteria. Outcomes included the proportion of patients with probable or definite FH, rate of use of lipid-lowering medications, LDL-C levels 1 year postadmission, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events during 30 months of follow-up. The study population comprised 687 young adults with a median age of 48.5 years. Definite/probable FH was present in 61 patients (8.9%). At 1 year of follow-up, the proportions of patients without FH who had LDL-C levels <70 and <55 mg/100 ml were higher than those of patients with FH (55.9% vs 18%, p <0.001 and 35.8% vs 11.5%, p <0.001, respectively). At 1 year of follow-up, only 47.5% and 22% of patients with FH were treated with ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor than were those without FH. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events was significantly higher among patients with FH. In conclusion, clinically defined FH was present in nearly 1 of 11 patients with premature ACS. There is a necessity for more aggressive lipid-lowering therapies in patients with FH after experiencing ACS.

Sex differences in LDL-C response to PCSK9 inhibitors: A real world experience

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown the efficacy of PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) in lowering LDL-C. One clinical trial with alirocumab suggested that the LDL-C reduction effect is larger in men than women. In contrast, none of the studies with evolocumab have observed a difference in the treatment effect between men and women. However, sex differences data from real life experience is lacking. In addition, the difference in LDL-C response to PCSK9i between pre- and post-menopausal women has not been investigated so far.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative change in LDL-C following the introduction of a PCSK9i in a real-life clinical setting according to sex and menopausal status.

METHODS

All patients were recruited at the IRCM lipid clinic. Lipid profiles before and after the introduction of PCSK9i were available in the medical file for 259 patients (160 men and 99 women (72 post-menopausal, 20 pre-menopausal and 7 unknown menopausal status).

RESULTS

We observed a significant difference in relative LDL-C change between men (-70%) and women (-59%), p<0.0001. However, no difference was observed between pre-menopausal (-58%) and post-menopausal (-58%) women. In a linear regression model, sex remains a significant predictor of the response to PCSK9i after correction for confounding factors such as statin intensity (beta coefficient=-0.245, p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

We observed a greater relative LDL-C response to PCSK9i in men than in women in a real-life clinical context. However, it is still unknown whether this difference in LDL-C change between men and women translates into a meaningful difference on long-term cardiovascular risk.

Prevalence of Diabetes and Its Association with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: An Analysis from the Hellenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry (HELLAS-FH)

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are both associated with a high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Little is known about the prevalence of T2DM and its association with ASCVD risk in FH patients. This was a cross-sectional analysis from the Hellenic Familial Hypercholesterolemia Registry (HELLAS-FH) including adults with FH (n = 1719, mean age 51.3 ± 14.6 years). Of FH patients, 7.2% had a diagnosis of T2DM. The prevalence of ASCVD, coronary artery disease (CAD), and stroke was higher among subjects with T2DM compared with those without (55.3% vs. 23.3%, 48.8% vs. 20.7%, 8.3% vs. 2.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). When adjusted for age, systolic blood pressure, smoking, body mass index, hypertension, waist circumference, triglyceride levels, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and gender, T2DM was significantly associated with prevalent ASCVD [OR 2.0 (95% CI 1.2−3.3), p = 0.004]. FH patients with T2DM were more likely to have undergone coronary revascularization than those without (14.2% vs. 4.5% for coronary artery bypass graft, and 23.9% vs. 11.5% for percutaneous coronary intervention, p < 0.001). T2DM is associated with an increased risk for prevalent ASCVD in subjects with FH. This may have implications for risk stratification and treatment intensity in these patients.

Subclinical atherosclerosis determined by coronary artery calcium deposition in patients with clinical familial hypercholesterolemia

Background and aims

Limited knowledge exists regarding the association between coronary artery calcium (CAC) deposition in patients with clinical familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and FH subtypes such as polygenic causes. We studied CAC score in patients with clinical FH and subtypes including polygenic causes of FH compared to healthy controls.

Methods

In a case-control study, we identified potential clinical FH cases registered with an LDL-C >6.7 mmol/l within a nationwide clinical laboratory database on the Faroe Islands and invited them for diagnostic evaluation according to clinical FH scoring systems. Controls were identified in the background population. All subjects were aged 18-75 years and without a history of cardiovascular disease. FH mutation testing and genotypes of twelve LDL-C associated single nucleotide polymorphisms were determined using conventional methods in selected individuals. CAC scores were assessed by cardiac CT. Odds ratios obtained using multivariate logistic regression were used as measures of association.

Results

A total of 120 clinical FH patients and 117 age- and sex-matched controls were recruited. We found a very low frequency of monogenic FH (3%), but a high level of polygenic FH (60%) in those genetically tested (54%). There was a statistically significant association between the CAC score and a diagnosis of clinical FH with the highest observed odds ratio of 5.59 (95% CI 1.65; 18.94, p = 0.006) in those with a CAC score ≥300 compared to those with a CAC of zero. In supplemental analyses, there was a strong association between CAC scores and clinical FH of a polygenic cause.

Conclusion

We found a statistically significant association between CAC levels and clinical FH with the highest observed risk estimates among clinical FH cases of a presumed polygenic cause.

New Trends and Therapies for Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is associated with an elevated risk of atherosclerosis. The finding of monogenic defects indicates higher atherosclerotic risk in comparison with hypercholesterolemia of other etiologies. However, in heterozygous FH, cardiovascular risk is heterogeneous and depends not only on high cholesterol levels but also on the presence of other biomarkers and genes. The development of atherosclerosis risk scores specific for heterozygous FH and the use of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis imaging help with identifying higher-risk individuals who may benefit from further cholesterol lowering with PCSK9 inhibitors. There is no question about the extreme high risk in homozygous FH, and intensive LDL-cholesterol-lowering therapy must be started as soon as possible. These patients have gained life free of events in comparison with the past, but a high atherosclerosis residual risk persists. Furthermore, there is also the issue of aortic and supra-aortic valve disease development. Newer therapies such as inhibitors of microsomal transfer protein and angiopoietin-like protein 3 have opened the possibility of LDL-cholesterol normalization in homozygous FH and may provide an alternative to lipoprotein apheresis for these patients. Gene-based therapies may provide more definite solutions for lowering high LDL cholesterol and consequent atherosclerosis risk for people with FH.

A subgroup analysis of the ODYSSEY APPRISE study: Safety and efficacy of alirocumab in the Italian cohort

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

ODYSSEY APPRISE trial evaluated efficacy and safety of alirocumab in 994 patients with hypercholesterolemia and high CV risk in a real-life setting. The aim of the present report is to detail on the Italian cohort enrolled and treated in the trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The methodology of the of the multinational, single-arm, Phase 3b open-label ODYSSEY APPRISE (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02476006) has been previously reported. 255 Italian patients were enrolled and treated according to the trial protocol. Overall mean exposure to alirocumab was 83.3 ± 27.7 weeks. At week 12, LDL-C decreased by 51.3 ± 23.1% and this reduction was overall maintained for the duration of the study. A similar reduction was observed in patients with and without heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH 50.7% ± 23.9 vs. non-FH, 53.6% ± 19.6). LDL-C was reduced below 1.8 mmol/L and/or by ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in 62% of patients overall (61% in HeFH and 67% in non-FH). Alirocumab was similarly well tolerated in the Italian cohort as in the entire study population and the more common treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were influenza, myalgia and nasopharyngitis. The incidence LDL-C levels <25 mg/dl and <15 mg/dl, was 8.2% and 2.9% respectively.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy and safety of alirocumab in a real-life setting, in the Italian subgroup of patients are consistent with findings in the entire study population and confirm that alirocumab is a beneficial approach to further reduce LDL-C levels in patients at high CV risk on maximally tolerated conventional lipid lowering treatment.

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT02476006.

World Heart Federation Cholesterol Roadmap 2022

Background:

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD) including myocardial infarction, stroke and peripheral arterial disease continue to be major causes of premature death, disability and healthcare expenditure globally. Preventing the accumulation of cholesterol-containing atherogenic lipoproteins in the vessel wall is central to any healthcare strategy to prevent ASCVD. Advances in current concepts about reducing cumulative exposure to apolipoprotein B (apo B) cholesterol-containing lipoproteins and the emergence of novel therapies provide new opportunities to better prevent ASCVD. The present update of the World Heart Federation Cholesterol Roadmap provides a conceptual framework for the development of national policies and health systems approaches, so that potential roadblocks to cholesterol management and thus ASCVD prevention can be overcome.

Methods:

Through a review of published guidelines and research papers since 2017, and consultation with a committee composed of experts in clinical management of dyslipidaemias and health systems research in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs), this Roadmap identifies (1) key principles to effective ASCVD prevention (2) gaps in implementation of these interventions (knowledge-practice gaps); (3) health system roadblocks to treatment of elevated cholesterol in LMICs; and (4) potential strategies for overcoming these.

Results:

Reducing the future burden of ASCVD will require diverse approaches throughout the life-course. These include: a greater focus on primordial prevention; availability of affordable cholesterol testing; availability of universal cholesterol screening for inherited dyslipidaemias; risk stratification moving beyond 10-year risk to look at lifetime risk with adequate risk estimators; wider availability of affordable cholesterol-lowering therapies which should include statins as essential medications globally; use of adequate doses of potent statin regimens; and combination therapies with ezetimibe or other therapies in order to attain and maintain robust reductions in LDL-C in those at highest risk. Continuing efforts are needed on health literacy for both the public and healthcare providers, utilising multi-disciplinary teams in healthcare and applications that quantify both ASCVD risk and benefits of treatment as well as increased adherence to therapies.

Conclusions:

The adverse effects of LDL-cholesterol and apo B containing lipoprotein exposure are cumulative and result in ASCVD. These are preventable by implementation of different strategies, aimed at efficiently tackling atherosclerosis at different stages throughout the human life-course. Preventive strategies should therefore be updated to implement health policy, lifestyle changes and when needed pharmacotherapies earlier with investment in, and a shift in focus towards, early preventive strategies that preserve cardiovascular health rather than treat the consequences of ASCVD.

The Inherited Hypercholesterolemias

Inherited hypercholesterolemias include monogenic and polygenic disorders, which can be very rare (eg, cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis (CTX)) or relatively common (eg, familial combined hyperlipidemia [FCH]). In this review, we discuss familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), FH-mimics (eg, polygenic hypercholesterolemia [PH], FCH, sitosterolemia), and other inherited forms of hypercholesterolemia (eg, hyper-lipoprotein(a) levels [hyper-Lp(a)]). The prevalence, genetics, and management of inherited hypercholesterolemias are described and selected guidelines summarized.

Prevalence and Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Severe Hypercholesterolemia in Older Adults in Ontario, Canada

Background

A simplified Canadian definition was recently developed to enable identification of individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and severe hypercholesterolemia in the general population. Our objective was to use a modified version of this new definition to assess contemporary disease prevalence, treatment patterns, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control in Ontario, Canada.

Methods

We identified individuals aged 66 to 105 years who were alive as of January 1, 2011, using the Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team (CANHEART) database, which was created by linking 19 population-based health databases in Ontario. Hypercholesterolemia was identified using LDL-C values. Cholesterol reduction and lipid-lowering treatment were assessed at time of diagnosis and after at least 2 and 5 years’ follow-up.

Results

Among 922,464 individuals, 2440 (0.26%) met criteria for definite or probable FH, and 72,893 (7.90%) for severe hypercholesterolemia. At diagnosis, mean LDL-C concentration was 9.52 mmol/L for those with definite FH, 5.83 mmol/L for those with probable FH, 5.73 mmol/L for those with severe hypercholesterolemia, and 3.33 mmol/L for all other individuals. After > 5 years, LDL-C concentration remained elevated at 3.58 mmol/L for those with definite FH, 2.72 mmol/L for those with probable FH, and 2.93 mmol/L for those with severe hypercholesteremia. Use of statin therapy was initially high (83% of those with definite FH, 78% of those with probable FH, 62% of those with severe hypercholesterolemia); however, fewer patients remained on statins at follow-up at > 5 years (62% of those with definite FH, 67% of those with probable FH, 58% of those with severe hypercholesterolemia).

Conclusions

Among older Ontarians, we estimated that 1 in 378 individuals had FH, and 1 in 13 had severe hypercholesterolemia. Despite being at substantially increased cardiovascular risk, these patients acheived suboptimal LDL-C level control and fewer were on medical therapy at follow-up.

Cardiovascular Risk and Treatment Outcomes in Severe Hypercholesterolemia: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular risk and outcomes after lipid reduction in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia using a nationwide cohort.

Methods and Results

This study used the database from the National Health Insurance Service of Korea. Among individuals who underwent regular health examination and follow‐up, 2 377 918 were enrolled and categorized into 3 groups with severe hypercholesterolemia according to low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) levels, namely, ≥260, 225 to 259, and 190 to 224 mg/dL groups, and a control group (<160 mg/dL). Risks of composite cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and ischemic stroke) and total mortality were compared. In statin new users, the outcomes after statin use were further analyzed according to posttreatment LDL‐C levels. The prevalence of individuals with LDL‐C≥190 mg/dL was 1 of 106. Adjusted hazard ratios of composite events and total mortality (median follow‐up, 6.1 years) in the groups ranged up to 2.4 (log‐rank P<0.0001) and 2.3 (log‐rank P=0.0002), respectively, and were dependent on LDL‐C levels. The risks of each event were up to 4.1‐, 3.8‐, and 1.9‐fold higher, respectively, in these groups. The risk of composite events (median follow‐up, 6.2 years) was lower after lipid lowering; particularly, the risk was lowest in the group showing LDL‐C<100 mg/dL after treatment (hazard ratio, 0.56, log‐rank P=0.043).

Conclusions

Using large Korean cohort data, our study proved incrementally elevated cardiovascular risk and clinical benefit associated with LDL‐C<100 mg/dL in individuals with severe hypercholesterolemia. These results support aggressive lipid lowering and provide evidence for the LDL‐C target in this population.

Low Detection Rates of Genetic FH in Cohort of Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia in the United Arabic Emirates

Background: Programs to screen for Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are conducted worldwide. In Western societies, these programs have been shown to be cost-effective with hit/detection rates of 1 in 217-250. Thus far, there is no published data on genetic FH in the Gulf region. Using United Arab Emirates as a proxy for the Gulf region, we assessed the prevalence of genetically confirmed FH in the Emirati population sample. Materials and Methods: We recruited 229 patients with LDL-C >95^th percentile and employed a customized next generation sequencing pipeline to screen canonical FH genes (LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, LDLRAP1). Results: Participants were characterized by mean total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) of 6.3 ± 1.1 and 4.7 ± 1.1 mmol/L respectively. Ninety-six percent of the participants were using lipid-lowering medication with mean corrected LDL-c values of 10.0 ± 3.0 mmol/L 15 out of 229 participants were found to suffer from genetically confirmed FH. Carriers of causal genetic variants for FH had higher on-treatment LDL-c compared to those without causal variants (5.7 ± 1.5 vs 4.7 ± 1.0; p = 3.7E-04). The groups did not differ regarding high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, body mass index, blood pressure, glucose, and glycated haemoglobin. Conclusion: This study reveals a low 7% prevalence of genetic FH in Emiratis with marked hypercholesterolemia as determined by correcting LDL-c for the use of lipid-lowering treatment. The portfolio of mutations identified is, to a large extent, unique and includes gene duplications. Our findings warrant further studies into origins of hypercholesterolemia in these patients. This is further supported by the fact that these patients are also characterized by high prevalence of type 2 diabetes (42% in the current study cohort) which already puts them at an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. These results may also be useful in public health initiatives for FH cascade screening programs in the UAE and maybe the Gulf region.

LDL cholesterol target achievement in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients according to 2019 ESC/EAS lipid guidelines: Implications for newer lipid-lowering treatments

BACKGROUND

The 2019 European guidelines (ESC/EAS) for the treatment of dyslipidaemias recommend more aggressive targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Current lipid-lowering treatment is often inadequate to achieve these targets.

METHODS

Data from the HELLAS-FH registry were analysed to assess achievement of LDL-C targets in adults with FH based on the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. In patients who had not achieved LDL-C target, the maximally reduced LDL-C value was calculated after theoretical switch to rosuvastatin/ezetimibe 40/10 mg/day. The percentage of patients who remained candidates for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) was then calculated.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 1694, mean age 50.8 ± 14.7 years) had LDL-C levels 242 ± 71 mg/dL (6.3 ± 1.8 mmol/L) at diagnosis. Most treated patients were receiving statins (97.5%) and about half were on additional ezetimibe (47.5%). Based on the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines the percentage of patients achieving LDL-C goals was only 2.7%. Following theoretical up titration to rosuvastatin/ezetimibe 40/10 mg, LDL-C target achievement rate would increase to 5.9%. In this scenario, most patients (55.9%) would be eligible for PCSK9i treatment. Following theoretical administration of a PCSK9i, LDL-C target achievement rate would rise to 57.6%. However, 42.4% of patients would still be eligible for further LDL-C lowering treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Most FH patients do not reach new LDL-C targets even if on maximum intensity statin/ezetimibe treatment. In this case, more than half of FH patients are candidates for PCSK9i therapy and a considerable proportion may still require additional LDL-C lowering.

Belgian data of ODYSSEY APPRISE: stringent LDL-c targets are in reach when using all available tools

BACKGROUND

As lipid targets became more stringent in the latest ESC/EAS guidelines, many patients on statin monotherapy are left above their risk-based target, increasing the need for lipid-lowering therapies. The results of the ODYSSEY APPRISE study were recently published by Gaudet et al In this trial, alirocumab (a PCSK9 inhibitor) was investigated in high cardiovascular risk patients in a real-life setting.

OBJECTIVE

We aim at analysing the characteristics, safety and efficacy of alirocumab in the Belgian population of the ODYSSEY APPRISE trial and, based on literature research, we aim to evaluate the importance and the need for the add-on, non-statin lipid-lowering therapy in clinical practice.

METHODS AND RESULTS

ODYSSEY APPRISE is a multicentric, prospective, single-arm, Phase 3b open-label trial. A total of 68 Belgian patients were enrolled, 63 patients had heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH). Baseline mean LDL-c was 188.7 mg/dL (SD ± 51.8). At week 12, 65 patients had an evaluable efficacy end point with a mean LDL-c reduction of 59.9% from baseline. The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was 75.0%. The most frequent TEAE was back pain (10.3%), nasopharyngitis (10.3%) and injection site erythema (8.8%). Based on the literature, a majority of patients do not reach their risk-based lipid target despite statin therapy alone.

CONCLUSION

In a real-life setting, alirocumab is both well-tolerated, safe and very effective in reducing LDL-c in this Belgian cohort. In clinical practice, more patients should be initiated on the add-on, non-statin lipid-lowering therapy in order to reach their risk-based lipid target.

The power of lipid registries for cardiovascular disease prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipid registry-based research is a valuable tool for assessing current lipid management in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Results of several registries are useful for improving clinical practice highlight gaps between guidelines and their implementation and potential impact on population health. We summarize recent clinical studies based on lipid registries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current guidelines for lipid management recommend high-intensity statins and concomitant therapies such as ezetimibe and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitors for high-risk patients. However, recent observational studies show that the majority of patients received inadequate lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and the low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment rates are still unsatisfactory.

SUMMARY

There is a clear gap between lipid guidelines and lipid management in clinical practice. Clinical studies based on registry databases represent real-world conditions, as opposed to clinical trials. Contemporary registry data reveal that only half of the patients received high-intensity statins, and less than half achieve the LDL-C <70 mg/dL in secondary prevention. In addition, the major reasons for insufficient therapy have been shown to be not only side effects of LLT, but poor adherence by patients to medication regimens and low use of combination therapies by physicians. The real-world evidence from lipid registries clarifies gaps, areas for focus for implementation, to improve CVD prevention.

Lipid management across Europe in the real-world setting: a rapid evidence review

OBJECTIVE

To provide a contemporary overview of recent real-world lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) practices and outcomes in patients with hypercholesterolemia/dyslipidemia at high/very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in Europe.

METHODS

A structured literature review of recent (July 2015-July 2020) real-world studies reporting lipid management and outcomes was conducted using a rapid evidence synthesis. Outcomes included patient characteristics, LLT treatment practices, adherence and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goal attainment.

RESULTS

Fifty-three real-world observational studies in high/very high risk patients were selected after screening 5664 records (n = 50 national [sample size range 38-237,279] and n = 3 multinational studies [sample size range 6648-8456]). Mean age ranged from 33 to 77 years; hypertension, diabetes and obesity were commonly reported comorbidities. Statins were the most common LLT; patients without familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) mostly received high or moderate intensity statins/LLT, while patients with FH mostly received high intensity statins/LLT. The proportion of patients receiving ezetimibe was low overall (ezetimibe + statin use in those with and without familial hypercholesterolemia [FH] range 5%-59% and 1%-22%, respectively). Overall, the use of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 inhibitor (PCSK9i) therapy was limited. Adherence to LLT therapies was defined variably and ranged from 46%-92%. LDL-C goal attainment was suboptimal, irrespective of LLT (overall range in goal attainment with oral LLT was 2%-73% [FH: 2%-23%] and with PCSK9i was 20%-65%).

CONCLUSIONS

LDL-C control is suboptimal and the available LLT armamentarium, most importantly combination therapy, is being underutilized in high/very high risk patients leading to inadequate management of cardiovascular risk.

Past, Present, and Future of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Management

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a monogenic form of severe hypercholesterolemia that, if left untreated, is associated with early onset of atherosclerosis. FH derives from genetic variants that lead to inefficient hepatic clearance of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles from the circulation. The FH phenotype is encountered in approximately 1 of every 300 people. The risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is higher in those with FH than in normolipidemic individuals and in those with polygenic hypercholesterolemia. FH is usually diagnosed by clinical scores that consider hypercholesterolemia, family history of early ASCVD and hypercholesterolemia, and cutaneous stigmata. Genetic diagnosis is important and should be offered to individuals suspected of FH. Family cascade screening is important to identify asymptomatic hypercholesterolemic individuals. Despite the high risk of ASCVD, this risk is heterogenous in heterozygous FH and depends not only on high LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) but also on other risk biomarkers. Risk can be evaluated by considering biomarkers such as male sex, late-onset therapy (> age 40), LDL-C > 310 mg/dL, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, elevated lipoprotein(a), obesity, diabetes, and hypertension by using specific risk equations and by detecting subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. Statins are the main therapy for FH and change the natural history of ASCVD; however, most individuals persist with elevated LDL-C. PCSK9 inhibitors provide robust and safe LDL-C lowering in FH, although elevated costs preclude their widespread use. Newer therapies such as ANGPTL3 inhibitors add intensive LDL-C lowering for refractory forms of FH. Finally, while it is possible to normalize LDL-C in people with FH, the disease unfortunately is still severely underdiagnosed and undertreated.

Characterization of Two Variants at Met 1 of the Human LDLR Gene Encoding the Same Amino Acid but Causing Different Functional Phenotypes

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is the most common genetic disorder of lipid metabolism, characterized by increased levels of total and LDL plasma cholesterol, which leads to premature atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. FH phenotype has considerable genetic heterogeneity and phenotypic variability, depending on LDL receptor activity and lifestyle. To improve diagnosis and patient management, here, we characterized two single nucleotide missense substitutions at Methionine 1 of the human LDLR gene (c.1A>T/p.(Met1Leu) and c.1A>C/p.(Met1Leu)). We used a combination of Western blot, flow cytometry, and luciferase assays to determine the effects of both variants on the expression, activity, and synthesis of LDLR. Our data show that both variants can mediate translation initiation, although the expression of variant c.1A>T is very low. Both variants are in the translation initiation codon and codify for the same amino acid p.(Met1Leu), yet they lead to different levels of impairment on LDLR expression and activity, corroborating different efficiencies of the translation initiation at these non-canonical initiation codons. The functional data of these variants allowed for an improved American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) classification for both variants, which can allow a more personalized choice of the lipid-lowering treatment and dyslipidemia management, ultimately improving patients' prognosis.