Left Atrial Appendage Isolation in Patients With Longstanding Persistent AF Undergoing Catheter Ablation

Ablation Strategies for Repeat Procedures in Atrial Fibrillation Recurrences Despite Durable Pulmonary Vein Isolation: The Prospective Randomized ASTRO AF Multicenter Trial

BACKGROUND

Ablation strategies for patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and isolated pulmonary veins vary and their effects on arrhythmia recurrence remain unclear. A prospective randomized German multicenter trial sought to compare 2 ablation strategies in this patient cohort.

METHODS

Patients with atrial fibrillation despite durable pulmonary vein isolation were randomly assigned at 7 centers to undergo low-voltage area ablation using 3-dimensional mapping and irrigated radiofrequency current ablation (group A) or empirical left atrial appendage isolation (LAAI) using the cryoballoon followed by staged interventional left atrial appendage closure (group B). The primary end point was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias between 91 and 365 days after index ablation. The study was powered for superiority of LAAI compared with low-voltage area.

RESULTS

Patients (40% women; mean age, 68.8±8 years) with paroxysmal (32%) or persistent atrial fibrillation (68%) were randomized to undergo low-voltage area ablation (n=79) or cryoballoon-guided LAAI (n=82). After a planned interim analysis, enrollment was halted for futility on January 10, 2023. In the LAAI group, 77 of 82 left atrial appendages were successfully isolated with subsequent left atrial appendage closure in 57 patients. Procedure-related complications occurred in 4 (5%) and 11 (13.5%) patients in group A and B, respectively (P=0.10). The median follow-up was 367 days (interquartile range, 359-378). The Kaplan-Meier point estimate for freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias was 51.7% (CI, 40.9%-65.4%) for group A and 55.5% (CI, 44.4%-69.2%; P=0.8069) for group B.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study did not detect superiority of cryoballoon-guided LAAI over low-voltage area ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation despite durable PVI.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04056390.

First-in-Human Percutaneous Epicardial-Only Left Atrial Appendage Closure Using Sierra Left Atrial Appendage Ligation System

Background: In patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications for oral anticoagulation, in which an increased risk of stroke remains, a left atrial appendage exclusion should be considered for elimination, because the left atrial appendage is the most common site of thrombus. The aim of this study is to present the first-in-human study results of the Sierra Aegis Left Atrial Appendage Ligation System, a new epicardial-only left atrial appendage closure system. Methods: This study was a prospective, first-in-human, single-center study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of the Sierra Aegis Left Atrial Appendage Ligation System device for epicardial left atrial appendage closure. Seven patients (mean age: 57.3 ± 10.6 years, 71.4% male) were qualified for a left atrial appendage closure because of an increased risk of bleeding with the need for lifelong anticoagulation pharmacology due to an increased risk of stroke. The patients' preoperative and intraoperative characteristics were collected. Patients were observed during their 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up. Results: The mean procedure time was 21.2 ± 8.2 min. All patients spent 3 days in the hospital including monitoring, the performance of preoperative CT scans, and anatomical evaluation. No tamponade, bleeding, thrombus, or left atrial appendage leakage were observed during the procedure or in-hospital stay. During the 1-month, 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up visits, none of the patients reported any complications. No tamponade, leakage, or left atrial appendage thrombus were observed. Conclusions: This first-in-human study regarding Sierra use for left atrial appendage closure shows promising results regarding the effectiveness and safety of the Sierra device for use in humans.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: indications and future perspective

Recent advances in techniques, technologies and proven superiority over anti-arrhythmic drugs have made catheter ablation the cornerstone of management for atrial fibrillation (AF), which has shown a steady increase in prevalence in the ageing population worldwide. The aim of therapeutic interventions is to achieve stable sinus rhythm that would improve the quality of life and reduce the risk of AF-associated complications. Pulmonary veins (PVs) were first described as the source of initiation of ectopic triggers driving AF, which led to the establishment of PV isolation (PVI) as the most widely practiced procedure to treat AF. Antral PVI is still recognized as the stand-alone ablation strategy for newly diagnosed paroxysmal AF (PAF). However, in non-PAF patients, PVI seems to be inadequate and several adjunctive strategies, including ablation of left atrial posterior wall and non-PV triggers, AF mapping and ablation of rotors and drivers, ethanol infusion of vein of Marshall and renal denervation, etc. have been reported with mixed results. Recent trials have also documented the benefits of early rhythm control in preventing cardiovascular events in addition to slowing the progression of PAF to more persistent forms. Similarly, very late relapse of the arrhythmia after successful PVI has drawn attention to the critical role of non-PV triggers and highlighted their relevance as potential ablation targets during repeat procedures. Ablation technology is also under constant evolution with the introduction of non-thermal energy sources and new tools to create durable lesions. This review summarizes the indications, advancements, and future perspective of AF ablation.

Strategy Optimization for a Combined Procedure in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The COMBINATION Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The optimal strategy of combining left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) with catheter ablation (CA) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) during a single procedure remains unclear.

Objective

To determine the effects of ablation-first vs occlusion-first strategies on long-term clinical outcomes among patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing a combined LAAO and CA procedure.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The prospective, multicenter COMBINATION randomized clinical trial was conducted in 14 high-volume centers in China. Enrollment of patients with nonvalvular AF referred for the combined procedure began on July 24, 2020, and concluded on January 20, 2022.

Interventions

Patients were randomly assigned to either the ablation-first group or the occlusion-first group. Outcomes of LAAO using an occlusion device and CA using a contact force-sensing catheter following different combination strategies during long-term follow-up were evaluated.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was a composite of thromboembolic events including stroke or transient ischemic attack, device-related thrombus (DRT), clinically relevant bleeding, and cardiovascular rehospitalization or death. Freedom from AF or atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) after a single procedure without antiarrhythmic drugs, at both 1 year and long-term follow-up, was also evaluated.

Results

Of the 202 patients enrolled, 194 (96.0%) completed the trial (97 in the ablation-first group and 97 in the occlusion-first group). The mean (SD) age of the cohort was 67.3 (9.2) years, and 110 patients (56.7%) were male. All procedures achieved acute successful LAAO and restoration of sinus rhythm, with similar incidences of periprocedural complications. Compared with the ablation-first group, the occlusion-first group exhibited significantly higher event-free survival of the primary end point (83.5% vs 71.1%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.53 [95% CI, 0.29-0.95]; log-rank P = .04) during the median 2.5 (IQR, 2.3-2.8) years of follow-up. Subgroup analysis indicated that male patients and those with higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores (a composite of factors associated with stroke risk; higher scores indicate higher risk) were at lower risk of thromboembolic events. Rates of long-term freedom from AF (77.3% vs 63.5%; HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.34-0.97]; log-rank P = .04) and from ATA (70.1% vs 55.7%; HR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.39-0.99]; log-rank P = .04) were higher in the occlusion-first group vs the ablation-first group. Additionally, a higher incidence of chronic peridevice leak (15 [15.5%] vs 5 [5.2%]; P = .03) and DRT (8 [8.2%] vs 1 [1.0%]; P = .04) was observed in the ablation-first group vs the occlusion-first group.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, the occlusion-first approach was superior due to its higher event-free survival of the primary end point and long-term freedom from ATA. These findings suggest that the occlusion-first approach should be recommended for combined procedures with plug-like device implantation.

Trial Registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2000031486.

Are drivers recurring or ephemeral? observations from serial mapping of persistent atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Rotational re-entries and ectopic foci, or 'drivers', are proposed mechanisms for persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF), but driver-based interventions have had mixed success in clinical trials. Selective targeting of drivers with multi-month stability may improve these interventions, but no prior work has investigated whether drivers can be stable on such a long timescale.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that drivers could recur even several months after initial observation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed serial electrophysiology studies on paced canines (n = 18, 27-35 kg) at 1-, 3-, and 6 months post-initiation of continual persAF. Using a high-density 64-electrode catheter, we captured endocardial electrograms in the left atrium (LA) and right atrium (RA) to determine the presence of drivers at each major anatomical site. We defined drivers that were repeatedly observed across consecutive studies to be recurrent. The mean probability that any driver would recur was 66% (LA: 73%, RA: 41%). We also found evidence of 'multi-recurring' drivers, i.e. those seen in all three studies. Multi-recurring drivers constituted 53% of initially observed drivers with at least one found in 92% of animals, and we found more multi-recurring drivers per animal than predicted by random chance (2.6 ± 1.5 vs. 1.2 ± 1.1, P < 0.001). Driver sites showed more enhancement than non-drivers during late gadolinium enhancement-magnetic resonance imaging (P = 0.04), but we observed no relationship between enhancement and driver recurrence type.

CONCLUSION

We observed recurring drivers over a 6-month period at fixed locations, confirming our hypothesis. We also found drivers to be associated with fibrosis, implying a structural basis.

Device-Assisted Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion: From Basic Sciences to Clinical Applications

Device-assisted left atrial appendage exclusion plays a crucial role in the prevention of fatal ischemic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications to anticoagulation treatment. Various devices with different safety profiles and device-related complications are available in daily practice to perform this procedure. In this review, the anatomy, physiology, and functions of the left atrial appendage were detailed, and all available devices used for epicardial and endocardial exclusion of the left atrial appendage and their clinical outcomes were discussed. Future research should aim to further investigate the long-term effects of left atrial appendage exclusion on body homeostasis, blood coagulation, and cardiac function.

Multielectrode catheter-based pulsed field ablation of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation

AIMS

Rhythm control of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is significantly more challenging, as a result of arrhythmia perpetuation promoting atrial substrate changes and AF maintenance. We describe a tailored ablation strategy targeting multiple left atrial (LA) sites via a pentaspline pulsed field ablation (PFA) catheter in persistent AF sustained beyond 6 months (PerAF > 6 m) and long-standing persistent AF (LSPAF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ablation protocol included the following stages: pulmonary vein antral and posterior wall isolation plus anterior roof line ablation (Stage 1); electrogram-guided substrate ablation (Stage 2); atrial tachyarrhythmia regionalization and ablation (Stage 3). Seventy-two [age:68 ± 10years, 61.1%males; AF history: 25 (18-45) months] patients with PerAF > 6 m (52.8%) and LSPAF (47.2%) underwent their first PFA via the FarapulseTM system. LA substrate ablation (Stage 1 and 2) led to AF termination in 95.8% of patients. AF organized into a left-sided atrial flutter (AFlu) in 46 (74.2%) patients. The PFA catheter was used to identify LA sites showing diastolic, low-voltage electrograms and entrainment from its splines was performed to confirm the pacing site was inside the AFlu circuit. Left AFlu termination was achieved in all cases via PFA delivery. Total procedural and LA dwell times were 112 ± 25 min and 59 ± 22 min, respectively. Major complications occurred in 2 (2.8%) patients. Single-procedure success rate was 74.6% after 14.9 ± 2.7 months of follow-up; AF-free survival was 89.2%.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, PFA-based AF substrate ablation led to AF termination in 95.8% of cases. Very favourable clinical outcomes were observed during >1 year of follow-up.

Concurrent percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: State-of-the-art review

Stroke prevention and symptom control are two integral pillars in atrial fibrillation (AF) management. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is effective at reducing stroke risk in high-risk patients with AF who cannot tolerate oral anticoagulant therapy, whilst catheter ablation is effective at reducing AF burden and improving quality-of-life in patients who remain symptomatic despite medical therapy. If both procedures are indicated in an individual patient, they have traditionally been performed on separate occasions, due to long cumulative procedural times, itself associated with thromboembolic risk. Recently, with the advancement of procedural techniques, the concept of concurrent LAAO and AF catheter ablation has gained traction. This review summarises the evidence for and against concurrent LAAO and AF catheter ablation, discussing procedural considerations, including procedural sequencing and post-procedural antithrombotic therapy, safety and efficacy outcomes, and future directions in the field.

Outcomes of hybrid surgical ablation and concomitant left atrial appendage exclusion in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Management of patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) presents a clinical challenge. Hybrid convergent ablation has been shown to have superior efficacy compared to endocardial-only ablation. However, data on concomitant left atrial appendage (LAA) management along with hybrid ablation is sparse.

METHODS

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of concomitant hybrid convergent ablation and LAA clipping in patients with LSPAF. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with LSPAF who underwent hybrid surgical ablation with LAA clipping at our institution. The primary endpoint was a recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months. Further, the durability of surgical left atrial posterior wall ablation was examined during the endocardial catheter ablation using standing electrophysiological criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients were included. Mean age was 63.5 ± 9.6 years, and 71% were males. LAA clipping was performed in 99% of patients. The mean time between the surgical and endocardial stages of the procedure was 2.6 ± 1.7 months. Persistent posterior wall activity was observed in 34.2% (n = 27/79) patients during the endocardial phase of the procedure. Cardiac implantable electronic device was used in 74% of patients for monitoring of recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The primary effectiveness of AF freedom at 12 months was 73.8% (45/61). Over a 12-month follow-up period, 11.4% (9/79) of patients required repeat catheter ablation, of which 88.9% (8/9) had evidence of persistent posterior wall activity.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant hybrid convergent ablation and LAA exclusion with an atrial clip provides reasonable long-term AF-free survival in patients with LSPAF. Persistent posterior wall activity is seen commonly in patients presenting with recurrent AF following hybrid convergent AF ablation.

Atrial Fibrillation and Underlying Structural and Electrophysiological Heterogeneity

As atrial fibrillation (AF) progresses from initial paroxysmal episodes to the persistent phase, maintaining sinus rhythm for an extended period through pharmacotherapy and catheter ablation becomes difficult. A major cause of the deteriorated treatment outcome is the atrial structural and electrophysiological heterogeneity, which AF itself can exacerbate. This heterogeneity exists or manifests in various dimensions, including anatomically segmental structural features, the distribution of histological fibrosis and the autonomic nervous system, sarcolemmal ion channels, and electrophysiological properties. All these types of heterogeneity are closely related to the development of AF. Recognizing the heterogeneity provides a valuable approach to comprehending the underlying mechanisms in the complex excitatory patterns of AF and the determining factors that govern the seemingly chaotic propagation. Furthermore, substrate modification based on heterogeneity is a potential therapeutic strategy. This review aims to consolidate the current knowledge on structural and electrophysiological atrial heterogeneity and its relation to the pathogenesis of AF, drawing insights from clinical studies, animal and cell experiments, molecular basis, and computer-based approaches, to advance our understanding of the pathophysiology and management of AF.

Outcomes of surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation in on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVES

A considerable number of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery suffer from atrial fibrillation and should be treated concomitantly. This manuscript evaluates the impact of on-pump versus off-pump bypass grafting on the applied lesion set and rhythm outcome.

METHODS

Between January 2017 and April 2020, patients who underwent combined bypass grafting and surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation were consecutively enrolled in the German CArdioSurgEry Atrial Fibrillation registry (CASE-AF, 17 centres). Data were prospectively collected. Follow-up was planned after one year.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients were enrolled. No differences in baseline characteristics were seen between on- and off-pump bypass grafting, especially not in type of atrial fibrillation and left atrial size. In the on-pump group (n = 171, 76%), pulmonary vein isolation and an extended left atrial lesion set were performed more often compared to off-pump bypass grafting (58% vs 26%, 33 vs 9%, respectively, P < 0.001). In off-pump bypass grafting a box isolating the atrial posterior wall was the dominant lesion (72% off-pump vs 42% on-pump, P < 0.001). Left atrial appendage management was comparable in on-pump versus off-pump bypass grafting (94% vs 91%, P = 0.37). Sinus rhythm at follow-up was confirmed in 61% in the on-pump group and in 65% in the off-pump group (P = 0.66). No differences were seen in in-hospital or follow-up complication-rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In coronary artery bypass grafting patients undergoing concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation, our data suggests that the technique applied for myocardial revascularization (off-pump vs on-pump) leads to differences in the ablation lesion set, but not in safety and effectiveness.

Catheter ablation alone versus catheter ablation with combined percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Combined catheter ablation (CA) with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may produce comprehensive treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) whereby rhythm control is achieved and stroke risk is reduced without the need for chronic oral anticoagulation. However, the efficacy and safety of this strategy is still controversial.

METHODS

This meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool. Eligible studies reported outcomes in patients with AF who underwent combined CA and LAAC vs CA alone. Studies performing CA without pulmonary vein isolation were excluded.

RESULTS

Eight studies comprising 1878 patients were included (2 RCT, 6 observational). When comparing combined CA and LAAC vs CA alone, pooled results showed no difference in arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio (RR) 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.33), stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.27-2.22), or major periprocedural complications (RR 1.28; 95% CI 0.28-5.89). Total procedure time was shorter with CA alone (mean difference 48.45 min; 95% CI 23.06-74.62).

CONCLUSION

Combined CA with LAAC for AF is associated with similar rates of arrhythmia-free survival, stroke, and major periprocedural complications when compared to CA alone. A combined strategy may be as safe and efficacious for patients at moderate to high risk for bleeding events to negate the need for chronic oral anticoagulation.

Perioperative outcome of left atrial appendage amputation in coronary artery bypass grafting

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage (LAA) amputation performed alongside cardiac surgery has become an increasingly established procedure to reduce stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation. As the recommendation levels for LAA amputation continue to rise, ample evidence assessing its perioperative safety and risk factors is of utmost interest.

METHODS

All patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 2018 and 2021 at two high-volume centers were retrospectively included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups-the CABG and CABG + LAA groups-based on whether they underwent concomitant LAA amputation. Propensity score matching (PS matching) was applied to ensure comparability between the groups. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite outcome comprising of all-cause mortality, stroke, and reoperation. Secondary endpoints included the components of the primary endpoint, perioperative outcome parameters, transfusion rates, and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 3904 patients were included with 3038 and 866 in the CABG and CABG + LAA group, respectively. After PS matching each group consisted of 856 patients. The primary endpoint showed no significant differences between the CABG and CABG + LAA group (7.0% vs. 6.5% (OR 0.9 95% CI [0.64; 1.35], p = 0.70)). Similarly, there were no notable differences in the individual components of the composite endpoint: all-cause mortality (p = 0.84), stroke (p = 0.74), and reoperation (p = 0.50). Subgroup results did not show any relevant dissimilarity.

CONCLUSION

The concomitant performance of LAA amputation is not associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, as measured by the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, stroke, and reoperation.

Durable LAA isolation combining pulsed field ablation and radiofrequency linear lesions in a patient with a therapy refractory left atrial appendage tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Treating atrial tachycardia (AT) originating from left atrial appendage (LAA) needs sometimes electrical isolation of LAA. We report a case of AT originating from LAA successfully treated with electrical isolation using the novel lattice-tip pulsed-field/radiofrequency ablation (PFA/RFA) catheter. A 55-year-old female patient with a history of three focal ablative attempts for a highly symptomatic AT originating from the LAA in different centers was admitted to our department for the recurrence of the clinical tachycardia. Electrical isolation of the LAA (LAAEI) was successfully performed with a lattice-tip PFA/RFA ablation catheter. Six weeks after the procedure, an invasive re-mapping study indicated a durable electrical LAA isolation; therefore, a 24-mm-sized LAA occlusion device (WATCHMAN FLX device, Boston Scientific, Plymouth, MN, USA) was implanted.

DISCUSSION

In this case, we successfully treated an atrial tachycardia originating from LAA using the recently approved lattice-tip PFA/RFA ablation catheter. The combination between two energy sources during the same procedure could potentially improve lesions transmurality offering a new promising solution for the treatment of complex atrial tachycardias.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Ablation Strategies for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Beyond the Pulmonary Veins

Despite advances in ablative therapies, outcomes remain less favorable for persistent atrial fibrillation often due to presence of non-pulmonary vein triggers and abnormal atrial substrates. This review highlights advances in ablation technologies and notable scientific literature on clinical outcomes associated with pursuing adjunctive ablation targets and substrate modification during persistent atrial fibrillation ablation, while also highlighting notable future directions.

Clinical incidence and relevance of incomplete endothelialization in atrial fibrillation patients with Left Atrial Appendage Closure

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to investigate the incidence, potential risk factors, and clinical outcomes of incomplete device endothelialization (IDE) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing Watchman left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).

METHODS

In this study, 68 AF patients who underwent successful implantation of the Watchman device without peri-device leak (PDL) during follow-up were included. The endothelialization status was assessed using Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and LAA computed tomography angiography (CTA) at 6 weeks and 6 months post-implantation. Adverse cerebro-cardiac events were documented at one-year follow-up. Baseline characteristics, including age, device sizes, and clinical indicators, were analyzed as potential predictors for IDE.

RESULTS

IDE was observed in 70.6% and 67.6% of patients at 6 weeks and 6 months after implantation, respectively. Higher levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [odds ratio (OR): 15.109, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.637-139.478, p = 0.017 and OR: 11.015, 95% CI: 1.365-88.896, p = 0.024] and lower aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (OR 0.924, 95% CI: 0.865-0.986, p = 0.017 and OR: 0.930, 95% CI: 0.874-0.990, p = 0.023) at baseline were found to be significantly associated with IDE at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively, although no significant difference in adverse cerebro-cardiac events was noted between incomplete and complete DE groups during 1-year follow-up CONCLUSIONS: IDE is found to be a prevalent occurrence in humans following LAAC. Elevated HDL-C and reduced AST levels are shown to be linked to an increased risk of IDE after LAAC.

Percutaneous LAAO and Pulsed-Field Isolation in a Canine Model: Feasibility and Safety Evaluation

In this study, we investigated the feasibility, safety, and efficiency of using a novel device system to perform percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion concomitant with left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) via pulsed field ablation. In the acute phase, LAAEI was successful in 10 of 10 canines. At follow-up, full endothelialization was observed in 5 of 5 (100%) cases at 6 months. LAAEI was durable in 8 of 10 (80.00%) canines. Histologic examination in 4 of 6 LAAs with durable isolation showed transmural scars comprising fibrosis and fat. No pericardial effusion or phrenic paralysis was observed at follow-up. This preliminary study provides the scientific basis for first-in-human studies.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

Hybrid-Convergent Procedure or Pulsed Field Ablation in Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Hybrid-convergent radiofrequency (RF) ablation targeting pulmonary veins (PVs) and left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) has shown better arrhythmic outcomes than an endocardial-only RF strategy, despite higher rates of complications. Comparisons with extensive pulsed field ablation (PFA) are currently lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the hybrid-convergent RF vs PFA of PVs and LAPW in long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF).

METHODS

Ninety-three consecutive LSPAF patients, treated with 2-step hybrid-convergent RF ablation (hybrid group, n = 49) or with PFA of PVs and LAPW (PFA group, n = 44) were enrolled. Primary efficacy endpoint was defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA) recurrence after the 3-month blanking period, over a follow-up time of 12 months. Periprocedural adverse events and late complications during follow-up were deemed primary safety outcomes.

RESULTS

The hybrid and PFA groups had similar baseline characteristics; mean age was hybrid 63.8 ± 10.6 years vs PFA 66.0 ± 7.4 years; P = 0.105. PV and LAPW ablation were acutely successful in all patients. Step 1 hybrid-epicardial procedures were longer than PFA (166 [Q1-Q3: 140-205] minutes vs 107.5 [Q1-Q3: 82.5-12] minutes; P < 0.01). At 12-month follow-up, there was no difference in ATA recurrences between groups (hybrid 36.7% vs PFA 40.9%; P = 0.680; log-rank at survival analysis P = 0.539). After adjusting for confounders, a larger left atrial volume and recurrences during the blanking-period were predictors of ATA recurrences after ablation, regardless of procedural technique employed. PFA showed a better safety profile with a lower rate of major periprocedural complications compared with hybrid ablation (12% vs 0%; P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Hybrid-convergent and PFA share comparable arrhythmic outcomes in LSPAF, but hybrid-convergent ablation carries higher periprocedural risks.

Deciphering mechanisms of cardiomyocytes and non-cardiomyocyte transformation in myocardial remodeling of permanent atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent cardiac arrhythmia, and it significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular complications and morbidity, even with appropriate treatment. Tissue remodeling has been a significant topic, while its systematic transcriptional signature remains unclear in AF.

OBJECTIVES

Our study aims to systematically investigate the molecular characteristics of AF at the cellular-level.

METHODS

We conducted single-nuclei RNA-sequencig (snRNA-seq) analysis using nuclei isolated from the left atrial appendage (LAA) of AF patients and sinus rhythm. Pathological staining was performed to validate the key findings of snRNA-seq.

RESULTS

A total of 30 cell subtypes were identified among 80, 592 nuclei. Within the LAA of AF, we observed a specific subtype of dedifferentiated cardiomyocytes (CMs) characterized by reduced expression of cardiac contractile proteins (TTN and TRDN) and heightened expression of extracellular-matrix related genes (COL1A2 and FBN1). Transcription factor prediction analysis revealed that gene expression patterns in dedifferentiated CMs were primarily regulated by CEBPG and GISLI. Additionally, we identified a distinct subtype of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) demonstrating elevated expression of PROM1 and KDR, a population decreased within the LAA of AF. Epicardial adipocytes disclosed a reduced release of the anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic factor PRG4, and an augmented secretion of VEGF signals targeting CMs. Additionally, we noted accumulation of M2-like macrophages and CD8+ T cells with high pro-inflammatory score in LAA of AF. Furthermore, the analysis of intercellular communication revealed specific pathways related to AF, such as inflammation, extracellular matrix, and vascular remodeling signals.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has discovered the presence of dedifferentiated CMs, a decrease in endothelial progenitor cells, a shift in the secretion profile of adipocytes, and an amplified inflammatory response in AF. These findings could offer crucial insights for future research on AF and serve as valuable references for investigating novel therapeutic approaches for AF.

Vein of Marshall chemical ablation decreases atrial fibrillation drivers detected by CARTOFINDER

INTRODUCTION

This study sought to elucidate the impact of vein of Marshall (VOM) chemical ablation on atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers by investigating the changes in CARTOFINDER mappings before and after VOM chemical ablation in patients with persistent AF.

METHODS

This study included 23 consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for long-persistent AF (>18 months). VOM chemical ablation was performed following pulmonary vein isolation. CARTOFINDER and AF cycle length (AFCL) maps were created in the left atrium (LA) before and after VOM chemical ablation. The LA was divided into 8 segments, and the number of focal activation points with 6 or more repetitions was counted in each segment.

RESULTS

The number of focal activation points was largest in the LA appendage (LAA). After VOM chemical ablation, the number of focal activation points in the LA decreased significantly (37 [interquartile range, IQR: 19-55] vs. 15 [IQR: 7-21], p < .001), and median AFCL was significantly prolonged (159 [147-168] vs. 164 [150-173] ms, p < .001). In the assessment of each segment, significant decreases in focal activation points were observed in the inferior, lateral, and anterior segments and LAA. Among the focal activation points disappearing after chemical ablation, the number in the non-ethanol-affected area was significantly larger than that in the affected area (13 [8-25] vs. 4 [1-10], p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

VOM chemical ablation decreases AF drivers detected by CARTOFINDER. Mechanisms other than direct myocardial damage are considered to contribute the attenuation of AF drivers.

A Comparative Study of Thoracoscopic Left Atrial Appendage Clipping vs Stapled Resection

BACKGROUND

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is the predominant site of thrombus formation in atrial fibrillation (AF), which is associated with ischemic stroke. This study comparatively evaluated the complete LAA closure rates between LAA clipping and stapled resections.

METHODS

The study included 333 patients who underwent thoracoscopic operation with both preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic scans. Propensity score matching (4:1 ratio) was applied, matching 90 LAA clipping patients with 206 stapled resection patients. The primary end point was complete LAA closure, defined as a residual LAA depth of <1 cm on computed tomographic images obtained 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

No 30-day death was observed. Complete LAA closure was achieved in 85.9% (286 of 333) of patients. After propensity score matching, the clipping group demonstrated a significantly higher complete LAA closure rate than the stapled resection group (95.6% vs 83.0%, P = .003). The residual LAA stump depth was also shorter in the clipping group compared with the stapled resection group (2.9 vs 5.3 mm, P = .001). Two patients with a residual LAA stump exhibited an association with ischemic stroke during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The clipping group demonstrated a higher rate of complete LAA closure compared with the stapled resection group. Close monitoring of patients with residual LAA stumps is essential. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to elucidate impact of the residual LAA stump on thromboembolic events.

Arrhythmias of the Left Atrial Appendage: Approaches to the Definitive Management of Atrial Tachycardia from the LAA Stump

The left atrial appendage (LAA) is now recognized as a significant contributor to arrhythmia and thromboembolism in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation. Thoracoscopic exclusion of the LAA is made possible with the AtriClip device. In this report, we describe the case of a 65-year-old man with history of multiple left atrial ablation procedures and LAA clipping. He developed a microreentrant atrial tachycardia originating from the anterior base of the LAA stump, underwent complete isolation of the LAA, and had subsequent resolution of arrhythmogenic activity from the residual LAA stump.

Safety and efficacy of the second-generation cryoballoon for left atrial appendage electrical isolation in canines

AIMS

Left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) has demonstrated a significant enhancement in the success rate of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. Nevertheless, concerns persist about the safety of LAAEI, particularly regarding alterations in left atrial appendage (LAA) flow velocity and the potential risks of thrombus. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LAAEI, investigating changes in LAA flow velocity in canines.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study comprised a total of 10 canines. The LAAEI procedure used by a 23 mm cryoballoon of the second generation was conducted at least 180 s. Intracardiac ultrasonography (ICE) was employed to quantify the velocity flow of the LAA both prior to and following LAAEI. Following a 3-month period, subsequent evaluations were performed to assess the LAA velocity flow and the potential reconnection. Histopathological examination was conducted. Left atrial appendage electrical isolation was effectively accomplished in all canines, resulting in a 100% acute success rate (10/10). The flow velocity in the LAA showed a notable reduction during LAAEI as compared with the values before the ablation procedure (53.12 ± 5.89 vs. 42.01 ± 9.22 cm/s, P = 0.007). After the follow-up, reconnection was observed in four canines, leading to a success rate of LAAEI of 60% (6/10). The flow velocity in the LAA was consistently lower (53.12 ± 5.89 vs. 44.33 ± 10.49 cm/s, P = 0.006), and no blood clot development was observed. The histopathological study indicated that there was consistent and complete injury to the LAA, affecting all layers of its wall. The injured tissue was subsequently replaced by fibrous tissue.

CONCLUSION

The feasibility of using cryoballoon ablation for LAAEI was confirmed in canines, leading to a significant reduction of LAA flow velocity after ablation. Some restoration of LAA flow velocity after ablation may be linked to the passive movement of the LAA and potential reconnecting. However, this conclusion is limited to animal study; more clinical data are needed to further illustrate the safety and accessibility of LAAEI in humans.

Impact of Left Atrial Posterior Wall Ablation During Pulsed-Field Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is insufficient to treat many patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PersAF). Adjunctive left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) ablation with thermal technologies has revealed lack of efficacy, perhaps limited by the difficulty in achieving lesion durability amid concerns of esophageal injury.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to compare the safety and effectiveness of PVI + LAPW ablation vs PVI in patients with PersAF using pulsed-field ablation (PFA).

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of the MANIFEST-PF (Multi-National Survey on the Methods, Efficacy, and Safety on the Post-approval Clinical Use of Pulsed Field Ablation) registry, we studied consecutive PersAF patients undergoing post-approval treatment with a pentaspline PFA catheter. The primary effectiveness outcome was freedom from any atrial arrhythmia of ≥30 seconds. Safety outcomes included the composite of acute and chronic major adverse events.

RESULTS

Of the 547 patients with PersAF who underwent PFA, 131 (24%) received adjunctive LAPW ablation. Compared to PVI-alone, patients receiving adjunctive LAPW ablation were younger (65 vs 67 years of age, P = 0.08), had a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.6 ± 1.6, P = 0.08), and were more likely to receive electroanatomical mapping (48.1% vs 39.0%, P = 0.07) and intracardiac echocardiography imaging (46.1% vs 17.1%, P < 0.001). The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was not statistically different between groups in the full (PVI + LAPW: 66.4%; 95% CI: 57.6%-74.4% vs PVI: 73.1%; 95% CI: 68.5%-77.2%; P = 0.68) and propensity-matched cohorts (PVI + LAPW: 71.7% vs PVI: 68.5%; P = 0.34). There was also no significant difference in major adverse events between the groups (2.2% vs 1.4%, respectively, P = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with PersAF undergoing PFA, as compared to PVI-alone, adjunctive LAPW ablation did not improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months.

Pulmonary Vein Isolation With or Without Left Atrial Appendage Ligation in Atrial Fibrillation: The aMAZE Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Left atrial appendage elimination may improve catheter ablation outcomes for atrial fibrillation.

Objective

To assess the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous left atrial appendage ligation adjunctive to catheter pulmonary vein isolation for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized clinical trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous left atrial appendage ligation adjunctive to planned pulmonary vein isolation for nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation present for less than 3 years. Eligible patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to undergo left atrial appendage ligation and pulmonary vein isolation or pulmonary vein isolation alone. Use of a 2:1 randomization ratio was intended to provide more device experience and safety data. Patients were enrolled from October 2015 to December 2019 at 53 US sites, with the final follow-up visit on April 21, 2021.

Interventions

Left atrial appendage ligation plus pulmonary vein isolation compared with pulmonary vein isolation alone.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A bayesian adaptive analysis was used for primary end points. Primary effectiveness was freedom from documented atrial arrythmias of greater than 30 seconds duration 12 months after undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Rhythm was assessed by Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation, symptomatic event monitoring, or any electrocardiographic tracing obtained through 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation. Primary safety was a composite of predefined serious adverse events compared with a prespecified 10% performance goal 30 days after the procedure. Left atrial appendage closure was evaluated through 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation.

Results

Overall, 404 patients were randomized to undergo left atrial appendage ligation plus pulmonary vein isolation and 206 were randomized to undergo pulmonary vein isolation alone. Primary effectiveness was 64.3% with left atrial appendage ligation and pulmonary vein isolation and 59.9% with pulmonary vein isolation only (difference, 4.3% [bayesian 95% credible interval, -4.2% to 13.2%]; posterior superiority probability, 0.835), which did not meet the statistical criterion to establish superiority (0.977). Primary safety was met, with a 30-day serious adverse event rate of 3.4% (bayesian 95% credible interval, 2.0% to 5.0%; posterior probability, 1.0) which was less than the prespecified threshold of 10%. At 12 months after pulmonary vein isolation, complete left atrial appendage closure (0 mm residual communication) was observed in 84% of patients and less than or equal to 5 mm residual communication was observed in 99% of patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

Percutaneous left atrial appendage ligation adjunctive to pulmonary vein isolation did not meet prespecified efficacy criteria for freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 12 months compared with pulmonary vein isolation alone for patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation, but met prespecified safety criteria and demonstrated high rates of closure at 12 months.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02513797.

Repeat catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is an established therapy that reduces AF burden, improves quality of life, and reduces the risks of cardiovascular outcomes. Although there are clear guidelines for the application of de novo catheter ablation, there is less evidence to guide recommendations for repeat catheter ablation in patients who experience recurrent AF. In this review, we examine the rationale for repeat ablation, mechanisms of recurrence, patient selection, optimal timing, and procedural strategies. We discuss additional important considerations, including treatment of comorbidities and risk factors, risk of complications, and effectiveness. Mechanisms of recurrent AF are often due to non-pulmonary vein (non-PV) triggers; however, there is insufficient evidence supporting the routine use of empiric lesion sets during repeat ablation. The emergence of pulsed field ablation may alter the safety and effectiveness of de novo and repeat ablation. Extrapolation of data from randomized trials of de novo ablation does not optimally inform efficacy in cases of redo ablation. Additional large, randomized controlled trials are needed to address important clinical questions regarding procedural strategies and timing of repeat ablation.

Atrial fibrosis heterogeneity is a risk for atrial fibrillation in pigs with ischaemic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Ischaemic heart failure (IHF) remains one of the most common causes of AF in clinical practice. However, ischaemia-mediated mechanisms leading to AF are still incompletely understood, and thus, current treatment approaches are limited. To improve our understanding of the pathophysiology, we studied a porcine IHF model.

METHODS

In pigs, IHF was induced by balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending artery for 90 min. After 30 days of reperfusion, invasive haemodynamic measurements and electrophysiological studies were performed. Masson trichrome and immunofluorescence staining were conducted to assess interstitial fibrosis and myofibroblast activation in different heart regions.

RESULTS

After 30 days of reperfusion, heart failure with significantly reduced ejection fraction (left anterior obique 30°, 34.78 ± 3.29% [IHF] vs. 62.03 ± 2.36% [control], p < .001; anterior-posterior 0°, 29.16 ± 3.61% vs. 59.54 ± 1.09%, p < .01) was observed. These pigs showed a significantly higher susceptibility to AF (33.90% [IHF] vs. 12.98% [control], p < .05). Histological assessment revealed aggravated fibrosis in atrial appendages but not in atrial free walls in IHF pigs (11.13 ± 1.44% vs. 5.99 ± .86%, p < .01 [LAA], 8.28 ± .56% vs. 6.01 ± .35%, p < .01 [RAA]), which was paralleled by enhanced myofibroblast activation (12.09 ± .65% vs. 9.00 ± .94%, p < .05 [LAA], 14.37 ± .60% vs. 10.30 ± 1.41%, p < .05 [RAA]). Correlation analysis indicated that not fibrosis per se but its cross-regional heterogeneous distribution across the left atrium was associated with AF susceptibility (r = .6344, p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that left atrial cross-regional fibrosis difference rather than overall fibrosis level is associated with IHF-related AF susceptibility, presumably by establishing local conduction disturbances and heterogeneity.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Left atrial function of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing thoracoscopic hybrid ablation

OBJECTIVES

Thoracoscopic hybrid ablation is an effective and safe rhythm control strategy for patients with complex forms of atrial fibrillation. Its effect on left atrial function has not yet been studied.

METHODS

In a retrospective single-centre analysis of patients undergoing thoracoscopic hybrid ablation, the left atrial emptying fraction was calculated using the biplane modified Simpson method in the apical 2- and 4-chamber views on transthoracic echocardiography. Left atrial strain (reservoir, conduction and contractility) was quantified using dedicated software.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were included (mean age 64 years, long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation in 69%, median atrial fibrillation history duration 64 months). At baseline, left atrial function and contractility were poor. The reservoir and contractile strain improved postprocedure compared to baseline [15 (standard deviation (SD): 8) and 17 (SD: 6); P = 0.013; 3 (SD: 5) and 4 (SD: 4), P = 0.008], whereas the left atrial volume indexed to the body surface area was reduced [51 ml/m2 (SD: 14) and 47 ml/m2 (SD: 18), P = 0.0024]. In patients with preoperative (long-standing) persistent atrial fibrillation and in patients with rhythm restoration, improvements in the emptying fraction, (reservoir and contractile) strain and the left ventricular ejection fraction were observed, whereas the left atrial volume decreased (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort of patients with severely diseased left atria, improvement in left atrial contractility and in the emptying fraction after thoracoscopic hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation is mainly due to rhythm restoration. Interestingly, the procedure itself also results in improved left atrial reservoir strain and reversed left atrial remodelling by reducing left atrial volume.

Robotic-Assisted Epicardial Hybrid Ablation and Left Appendage Closure in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: First European Experience

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation is currently considered to be the gold standard for ablating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. However, its efficacy is limited in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. The convergent procedure has emerged as a hybrid ablation. This study aims, for the first time in the literature, to introduce a hybrid approach that includes epicardial ablation with cutting-edge robotic technology and subsequent electrophysiological study to verify and an endocardial ablation to complete the ablation lines. Methods: We present 18 cases of robotic-assisted epicardial hybrid ablation performed between April and December 2023 on patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (mean age: 64 ± 5 years; mean duration: 4 ± 2 years). All of the procedures were performed at "Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital", Bergamo, Italy. Robot-assisted epicardial ablation performed using the "Epi-Sense AtriCure" device was guided by monitoring electrogram morphology and point-by-point impedance drop. This approach also included left atrial appendage occlusion and the disconnection of the ligament of Marshall. An electrophysiological study and endocardial ablation were planned three months after the procedure. Results: The procedure was successfully executed in all patients with no major complications and a mean operative time of 142 ± 22 min. None of the cases required conversion to full sternotomy or minithoracotomy. The procedure was performed in all cases without extracorporeal circulation and on a beating heart. Fifteen patients (83%) were extubated in the operating room. The length of stay in the intensive care unit was less than 24 h. Acute restoration of sinus rhythm was achieved in 12 out of the 18 patients (67%); the median duration of their hospital stay was two days. In the electrophysiological study, seven pts had sinus rhythm, two had atrial fibrillation, and one patient developed atrial flutter at 3-month follow-up. Patients underwent transcatheter ablation to complete the lesion set and, at the time of discharge, were all in sinus rhythm. Conclusions: In our initial experience, surgical atrial fibrillation ablation consisting of a unilateral thoracoscopic technique facilitated by a robotic platform and continuous EGM monitoring has proven to be safe and feasible. For the electrophysiological study at 3 months, completing the gaps in the surgical ablation lines could improve the clinical results of the technique in terms of sinus rhythm stability. However, mid- and long-term follow-up is required to demonstrate this.

Catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A review

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The higher mortality is due to the risk of heart failure and cardioembolic events. This in-depth review focuses on the strategies and efficacy of catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The main medical databases were searched for contemporary studies on catheter ablation for non-paroxysmal AF. Catheter ablation is currently proven to be the most effective treatment for AF and consists of pulmonary vein isolation as the cornerstone plus additional ablations. In terms of SR maintenance, it is less effective in non-paroxysmal AF than in paroxysmal patients. but the clinical benefit in non-paroxysmal patients is substantially higher. Since pulmonary vein isolation is ineffective, a variety of techniques have been developed, e.g. linear ablations, ablation of complex atrial fractionated electrograms, etc. Another paradox consists in the technique of catheter ablation. Despite promising results in early observation studies, further randomized studies have not confirmed the initial enthusiasm. Recently, a new approach, pulsed-field ablation, appears promising. This is an in-depth summary of current technologies and techniques for the ablation of non-paroxysmal AF. We discuss the benefits, risks and implications in the treatment of patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

Hybrid Endo-Epicardial Therapies for Advanced Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing health problem that increases morbidity and mortality, and in most patients progresses to more advanced diseases over time. Recent research has examined the underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and progression of AF, leading to updated AF disease classification schemes. Although endocardial catheter ablation is effective for early-stage paroxysmal AF, it consistently achieves suboptimal outcomes in patients with advanced AF. Identification of the factors that lead to the increased risk of treatment failure in advanced AF has spurred the development and adoption of hybrid ablation therapies and collaborative heart care teams that result in higher long-term arrhythmia-free survival. Patients with non-paroxysmal AF, atrial remodeling, comorbidities, or AF otherwise deemed difficult to treat may find hybrid treatment to be the most effective option. Future research of hybrid therapies in advanced AF patient populations, including those with dual diagnoses, may provide further evidence establishing the safety and efficacy of hybrid endo-epicardial ablation as a first line treatment.

Cryoballoon ablation of non-PV triggers in persistent atrial fibrillation

Cryoballoon-based catheter ablation has emerged as an efficacious and safe therapeutic intervention for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). PAF is primarily associated with the triggers in the pulmonary vein (PV). However, persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) is a complex condition that involves changes in the atrial substrate and the presence of non-PV triggers. Therefore, a comprehensive treatment approach is necessary for patients with PeAF. Utilizing a 3D electroanatomical map, the radiofrequency-based ablation technique adeptly identifies and targets the atrial substrate and non-PV triggers. On the other hand, the cryoballoon-based AF ablation was initially designed for PV isolation. However, its single-shot feature makes it a great choice for electrophysiologists looking to address non-PV triggers. It is possible to target the left atrial appendage (LAA), superior vena cava (SVC), left atrial roof, and posterior wall using the apparatus's unique configuration and ablation abilities. This review focuses on the increasing literature regarding cryoballoon-based methods for non-PV trigger ablation. Specifically, it delves into the technical procedures used to isolate the LAA, SVC, and ablate the left atrial roof and posterior wall.

LARIAT or AtriClip: Complications Profile and Comparison in Patients with Atrial Fibrillations Based on Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database

Background and Objectives: Left atrial appendage closure is an alternative treatment to reduce thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation in whom oral anticoagulation (OAC) is contraindicated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the complications profiles of the LARIAT and AtriClip devices and perform a comparison between them based on the MAUDE (Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience) database. Materials and Methods: The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was searched on 15 January 2023. For AtriClip, only reports regarding isolated procedures or procedures associated with minimally invasive ablation were included. Adverse effects and causes of death were defined based on the literature on the topic and the causes described in the reports. In total, 63 patients were included in the LARIAT group and 53 patients were included in the AtriClip group. Results: With the LARIAT device, the most common complication without device problems was pericardial effusion (n = 18, 52.9%), whereas this complication was not observed with AtriClip (p < 0.001). Postoperative bleeding was a second complication that occurred significantly more often in the LARIAT group-in 15 (44.1%) cases versus 1 (2.7%) case with AtriClip (p < 0.001). In addition, significant differences were found in the prevalence of stroke (LARIAT n = 0 vs. AtriClip n = 7, 18.9%, p = 0.012) and thrombus (LARIAT n = 2, 5.9% vs. n = 11, 29.7%, p = 0.013). Conclusions: Each type of left atrial appendage closure procedure is associated with device-specific requirements and complications that, if known, can be avoided.

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A review of techniques

Ablation of atrial fibrillation is a key area of current research. A multitude of techniques have been tested, some of which are poorly evidenced and not recommended in routine clinical practice whilst others are more promising. Additionally, a plethora of issues exist when researching ablation techniques, from control arm ablation strategy to the relevance of outcome measures. In this review article, we discuss these issues in the context of the current evidence base.

Simultaneous Pulsed Field Ablation and Mechanical Closure of Left Atrial Appendage Using a Novel Device

Left atrial appendage (LAA) was shown to harbor triggers and substrate for atrial arrhythmia, electrical isolation of the LAA can be a potential treatment. We describe the use of a novel device that combines electrical isolation of the LAA using pulsed field ablation and mechanical LAA occlusion in a single procedure. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.).

Temporal Trends and Lesion Sets for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis and Meta-Regression

BACKGROUND

Ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) has been performed for over 20 years, although success rates have remained modest. Several adjunctive lesion sets have been studied but none have become standard of practice. We sought to describe how the efficacy of ablation for PsAF has evolved in this time period with a focus on the effect of adjunctive ablation strategies.

METHODS

Databases were searched for prospective studies of PsAF ablation. We performed meta-regression and trial sequential analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 99 studies (15 424 patients) were included. Ablation for PsAF achieved the primary outcome (freedom of atrial fibrillation/atrial tachycardia rate at 12 months follow-up) in 48.2% (5% CI, 44.0-52.3). Meta-regression showed freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months has improved over time, while procedure time and fluoroscopy time have significantly reduced. Through the use of cumulative meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis, we show that some ablation strategies may initially seem promising, but after several randomized controlled trials may be found to be ineffective. Trial sequential analysis showed that complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation is ineffective and further study of this treatment would be futile, while posterior wall isolation currently does not have sufficient evidence for routine use in PsAF ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall success rates from PsAF ablation and procedure/fluoroscopy times have improved over time. However, no adjunctive lesion set, in addition to pulmonary vein isolation, has been conclusively demonstrated to be beneficial. Through the use of trial sequential analysis, we highlight the importance of adequately powered randomized controlled trials, to avoid reaching premature conclusions, before widespread adoption of novel therapies.

Hybrid Totally Thoracoscopic Maze and Catheter Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Initial Experience

Atrial fibrillation is now a pandemic in our ageing community. Although James L. Cox devised a surgical procedure with near-universal curative success in 1987, catheter-based interventions have flourished. For persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), however, an isolated endocardial approach has limitations: procedural times are long, carry risk, and the outcomes are not durable. By combining left atrial endocardial and epicardial interventions with staged mapping, we optimise the benefits of both approaches. Our initial series of hybrid ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation reports excellent early outcomes, freedom from complications and excellent success at follow-up.

Catheter Ablation for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: An Update of the Literature

Catheter ablation has been shown to be more effective at maintaining sinus rhythm and improving quality of life when compared to antiarrhythmic drugs. Radiofrequency and cryoablation are two effective methods. However, catheter-only ablation strategies have not consistently produced high success rates in treating longstanding and persistent AF patients. The emerging treatment of choice for such cases is hybrid ablation, which involves a multidisciplinary and minimally invasive approach to achieve surgical ablation of the direct posterior left atrial wall in combination with endocardial catheter ablation. Studies have shown promising results for the hybrid approach when compared with catheter ablation alone, but it is not without risks. Large and randomised studies are necessary to further evaluate these strategies for managing AF.

The completeness of the left atrial appendage amputation during routine cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage (LAA) is the origin of most heart thrombi which can lead to stroke or other cerebrovascular event in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to prove safety and low complication rate of surgical LAA amputation using cut and sew technique with control of its effectiveness.

METHODS

303 patients who have undergone selective LAA amputation were enrolled in the study in a period from 10/17 to 08/20. The LAA amputation was performed concomitant to routine cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass with cardiac arrest with or without previous history of AF. The operative and clinical data were evaluated. Extent of LAA amputation was examined intraoperatively by transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Six months in follow up, the patients were controlled regarding clinical status and episodes of strokes.

RESULTS

Average age of study population was 69.9 ± 19.2 and 81.9% of patients were male. In only three patients was residual stump after LAA amputation larger than 1 cm with average stump size 0.28 ± 0.34 cm. 3 patients (1%) developed postoperative bleeding. Postoperatively 77 (25.4%) patients developed postoperative AF (POAF), of which 29 (9.6%) still had AF at discharge. On 6 months follow up only 5 patients had NYHA class III and 1 NYHA class IV. Seven patients reported with leg oedema and no patient experienced any cerebrovascular event in early postoperative follow up.

CONCLUSION

LAA amputation can be performed safely and completely leaving minimal to no LAA residual stump.