2019 AATS/ACC/SCAI/STS Expert Consensus Systems of Care Document: Operator and Institutional Recommendations and Requirements for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Intervention

Evolving Concept of Aortic Valve Replacement in Asymptomatic Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Surgical treatment of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) has been gaining attention ever since the results of the Early Surgery Versus Conventional Treatment in Very Severe Aortic Stenosis (RECOVERY) and Aortic Valve replacement versus conservative treatment in Asymptomatic seveRe aortic stenosis (AVATAR) trials showed survival benefits with early surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). This study analyzed the long-term clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of SAVR in asymptomatic severe AS.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2020, 272 patients with asymptomatic severe AS and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% underwent SAVR with or without concomitant aortic surgery and met the study criteria. The median follow-up was 8.5 years (interquartile range, 6-12.8 years), for a total of 2584 patient-years. The time course of the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and the average E/E' (ratio of the Doppler-derived E wave to the tissue Doppler-derived E' wave) were assessed using 594 postoperative echocardiograms. The association of preoperative LVMI and average E/E' with survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards.

RESULTS

There was no operative mortality. On longitudinal analyses, LVMI improved in patients who presented with moderate or severe preoperative left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). However, after the early decline in average E/E', there was a late increase to greater than upper limit normal, particularly in patients with a preoperative average E/E'≥14. Postoperative survival was 100%, 94%, 84%, and 76% at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, comparable to age- and sex-matched expected survival on the basis of the US general population. On adjusted Cox survival analysis, only moderate to severe LVH was associated with a survival penalty (hazard ratio], 2.32; 95% CI, 1.02-5.27; P = .045).

CONCLUSIONS

In asymptomatic patients with AS, SAVR restores survival and improves LVH, but patients with diastolic dysfunction are left with persistent dysfunction. Presentation with moderate or severe LVH at the time of surgery translated to a survival penalty. This observational study supports early SAVR in this population before development of LVH, although further investigation is needed.

National Variation in Hospital MTEER Outcomes and Correlation With TAVR Outcomes: STS/ACC TVT Registry Analysis

BACKGROUND

A single, multitiered valve center designation has been proposed to publicly identify centers with expertise for all valve therapies. The correlation between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MTEER) procedures is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to examine the relationship between site-level volumes and outcomes for TAVR and MTEER. We further explored variability between sites for MTEER outcomes.

METHODS

Using the STS/ACC TVT (Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy) national registry, TAVR and MTEER procedures at sites offering both therapies from 2013 to 2022 were examined. Sites were ranked into deciles of adjusted in-hospital and 30-day outcomes separately for TAVR and MTEER and compared. Stepwise, hierarchical multivariable models were constructed for MTEER outcomes, and the median OR was calculated.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2022, 384,394 TAVRs and 53,274 MTEERs (median annualized volumes: 93.6 and 18.8, respectively) were performed across 453 U.S. sites. Annualized TAVR and MTEER volumes were moderately correlated (r = 0.48; P < 0.001). After adjustment, 14.3% of sites had the same decile rank for TAVR and MTEER 30-day composite outcome, 50.6% were within 2 decile ranks; 35% had more discordant outcomes for the 2 procedures (P = 0.0005). For MTEER procedures, the median OR for the 30-day composite outcome was 1.57 (95% CI: 1.51-1.64), indicating a 57% variability in outcome by site.

CONCLUSIONS

There is modest correlation between hospital-level volumes for TAVR and MTEER but low interprocedural correlation of outcomes. For similar patients, site-level variability for mortality/morbidity following MTEER was high. Factors influencing outcomes and "centers of excellence" as a whole may differ for TAVR and MTEER.

Mortality Associated With Proportionality of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair: North American Mitraclip for Functional Mitral Regurgitation Registry

The association, if any, between the effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) to left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) ratio and 1-year mortality is controversial in patients who undergo mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (m-TEER) with the MitraClip system (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). This study's objective was to determine the association between EROA/LVEDV and 1-year mortality in patients who undergo m-TEER with MitraClip. In patients with severe secondary (functional) mitral regurgitation (MR), we analyzed registry data from 11 centers using generalized linear models with the generalized estimating equations approach. We studied 525 patients with secondary MR who underwent m-TEER. Most patients were male (63%) and were New York Heart Association class III (61%) or IV (21%). Mitral regurgitation was caused by ischemic cardiomyopathy in 51% of patients. EROA/LVEDV values varied widely, with median = 0.19 mm2/ml, interquartile range [0.12,0.28] mm2/ml, and 187 patients (36%) had values <0.15 mm2/ml. Postprocedural mitral regurgitation severity was substantially alleviated, being 1+ or less in 74%, 2+ in 20%, 3+ in 4%, and 4+ in 2%; 1-year mortality was 22%. After adjustment for confounders, the logarithmic transformation (Ln) of EROA/LVEDV was associated with 1-year mortality (odds ratio 0.600, 95% confidence interval 0.386 to 0.933, p = 0.023). A higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was also associated with increased mortality. In conclusion, lower values of Ln(EROA/LVEDV) were associated with increased 1-year mortality in this multicenter registry. The slope of the association is steep at low values but gradually flattens as Ln(EROA/LVEDV) increases.

Association Between Hospital Volume and 30-Day Readmissions After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair

Data on the association between hospital procedural volume and 30-day readmissions after mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (mTEER) are limited. We used the 2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify hospitals that performed at least 5 mTEERs. Hospitals were categorized based on tertiles of annual mTEER volume as low-volume (5 to 13), medium-volume (14 to 28), and high-volume (29 to 171). Multivariable hierarchical logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline analyses were used to examine the association between hospital mTEER volume and 30-day readmissions. Median (interquartile range) annual hospital mTEER volume was 20 (11.5 to 34). Of 234 hospitals included in the study, 77 (32.9%), 77 (32.9%), and 80 (34.2%) were categorized as low-volume, medium-volume, and high-volume. Of 5,574 index mTEER procedures included in this study, 634 (11.4%), 1,353 (24.3%), and 3,587 (64.3%) were performed at low-volume, medium-volume, and high-volume centers, respectively. In the overall study cohort, rates of 30-day all-cause readmissions after mTEER were 13.2%. In multivariable analyses, there was no significant association between hospital mTEER volume (as a categorical variable) and 30-day all-cause or cause-specific (cardiac, non-cardiac, heart failure) readmissions. Similarly, no significant relation was observed between hospital mTEER volume as a continuous variable and 30-day all-cause or cause-specific readmissions in restricted cubic spline analysis. In conclusion, in a nationally representative sample of 234 hospitals with >5,500 mTEER procedures, we found no association between annual hospital mTEER volume and 30-day all-cause or cause-specific readmissions.

Impact of Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair on Left Atrial Strain and Atrial Fibrillation Progression

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) currently represents a valuable therapeutic option for patients with severe mitral regurgitation (MR) considered at high surgical risk. Besides symptoms and left ventricular (LV) echocardiographic improvements upon TEER, it has been postulated that left atrial (LA) function plays a prognostic role. The aims of our study were to evaluate LA changes after TEER, measured by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography analysis (2D-STE), their association with atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence, and relative arrhythmic burden. We considered in a single-center study 109 patients affected by symptomatic severe MR undergoing TEER from February 2015 to April 2022. By 2D-STE, LA reservoir (R_s), conduct (D_s), and contractile (C_s) strains were assessed along with four-chamber emptying fraction (LAEF-4CH) before, 1, 6, and 12 months following TEER. Statistical analysis for comparison among baseline, and follow-ups after TEER was carried out by ANOVA, MANOVA, and linear regression. Successful TEER significantly improved LV dimensions and LA performances, as indicated by all strain components, and LAEF-4CH after 1 year. Strikingly, a significant reduction in arrhythmic burden was observed, since only one case of subclinical AF detected by a previously implanted cardiac electronic device was found in the cohort of sinus rhythm patients (n = 48) undergone TEER; in addition, ventricular rate was reduced in the AF cohort (n = 61) compared to baseline, together with few episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardias (5/61, 8.2%) after MR improvement. Overall, TEER was associated with improved cardiac performance, LA function amelioration, and reduced arrhythmic burden.

Recommendations for Special Competency in Echocardiographic Guidance of Structural Heart Disease Interventions: From the American Society of Echocardiography

Transcatheter therapies for structural heart disease continue to grow at a rapid pace, and echocardiography is the primary imaging modality used to support such procedures. Transesophageal echocardiographic guidance of structural heart disease procedures must be performed by highly skilled echocardiographers who can provide rapid, accurate, and high-quality image acquisition and interpretation in real time. Training standards are needed to ensure that interventional echocardiographers have the necessary expertise to perform this complex task. This document provides guidance on all critical aspects of training for cardiology and anesthesiology trainees and postgraduate echocardiographers who plan to specialize in interventional echocardiography. Core competencies common to all transcatheter therapies are reviewed in addition to competencies for each specific transcatheter procedure. A core principle is that the length of interventional echocardiography training or achieved procedure volumes are less important than the demonstration of procedure-specific competencies within the milestone domains of knowledge, skill, and communication.

Risk of Surgical Mitral Valve Repair for Primary Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Risk estimation for surgical intervention is an essential component of heart team shared decision-making. However, current mitral valve (MV) surgery risk models used in practice lack etiologic or procedural specificity. The purpose of this study was to establish a comprehensive method for assessment of operative risk of MV repair of primary mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS

A novel etiology and procedure-specific algorithm identified 53,462 consecutive (July 2014 to June 2020) intention-to-treat MV repair patients with primary MR from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Risk models were fit for 30-day operative mortality, mortality and/or major morbidity, and conversion-to-replacement (CONV). As-treated mortality and morbidity models were derived separately.

RESULTS

Event rates for mortality (n = 619; 1.16%), mortality plus morbidity (n = 4746; 8.88%), and CONV (n = 3399; 6.36%) were low. Mortality was higher in CONV patients vs repair (3.18% vs 1.02%). All event rates were lower with increasing program volumes. The mortality risk model had excellent discrimination (AUC: 0.807) and calibration and confirmed very low mortality risk for isolated MV repair for primary MR, with mean mortality risk of 1.16% and median of 0.55% (interquartile range: 0.30%-1.17%) with 90th and 95th percentiles 2.48% and 3.99%, respectively. The mortality risk was <0.5% in patients <65 years of age, with 97% of the total population across age groups having a risk of <3%. Only 1 in 4 patients age 75 or older had >3% estimated risk of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This etiologic and procedure-specific risk model establishes that the contemporary mortality risk of MV repair for primary MR is <1% for the vast majority of patients.

Risk of Surgical Mitral Valve Repair for Primary Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Risk estimation for surgical intervention is an essential component of heart team shared decision-making. However, current mitral valve (MV) surgery risk models used in practice lack etiologic or procedural specificity.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to establish a comprehensive method for assessment of operative risk of MV repair of primary mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS

A novel etiology and procedure-specific algorithm identified 53,462 consecutive (July 2014 to June 2020) intention-to-treat MV repair patients with primary MR from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Risk models were fit for 30-day operative mortality, mortality and/or major morbidity, and conversion-to-replacement (CONV). As-treated mortality and morbidity models were derived separately.

RESULTS

Event rates for mortality (n = 619; 1.16%), mortality plus morbidity (n = 4,746; 8.88%), and CONV (n = 3,399; 6.36%) were low. Mortality was higher in CONV patients vs repair (3.18% vs 1.02%). All event rates were lower with increasing program volumes. The mortality risk model had excellent discrimination (AUC: 0.807) and calibration and confirmed very low mortality risk for isolated MV repair for primary MR, with mean mortality risk of 1.16% and median of 0.55% (IQR: 0.30%-1.17%) with 90th and 95th percentiles 2.48% and 3.99%, respectively. The mortality risk was <0.5% in patients <65 years of age, with 97% of the total population across age groups having a risk of <3%. Only 1 in 4 patients age 75 or older had >3% estimated risk of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

This etiologic and procedure-specific risk model establishes that the contemporary mortality risk of MV repair for primary MR is <1% for the vast majority of patients.

Research Opportunities in the Treatment of Mitral Valve Prolapse: JACC Expert Panel

In light of the adverse prognosis related to severe mitral regurgitation, heart failure, or sudden cardiac death in a subset of patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP), identifying those at higher risk is key. For the first time in decades, researchers have the means to rapidly advance discovery in the field of MVP thanks to state-of-the-art imaging techniques, novel omics methodologies, and the potential for large-scale collaborations using web-based platforms. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute recently initiated a webinar-based workshop to identify contemporary research opportunities in the treatment of MVP. This report summarizes 3 specific areas in the treatment of MVP that were the focus of the workshop: 1) improving management of degenerative mitral regurgitation and associated left ventricular systolic dysfunction; 2) preventing sudden cardiac death in MVP; and 3) understanding the mechanisms and progression of MVP through genetic studies and small and large animal models, with the potential of developing medical therapies.

Design Variation, Implantation, and Outcome of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Prosthesis: A Comprehensive Review

The transcatheter mitral valve prosthesis is ideally suited for patients with inoperable mitral etiology. The transcatheter mitral valve implantation (TMVI) procedure has closely followed the evolution of transcatheter aortic procedures. There are considerable design variations amongst the limited TMVI prostheses currently available, and the implantation profiles of the devices are notably different. This comprehensive review will provide an overview of the current clinically tried TMVI devices with a focused outcome analysis. In addition, we have discussed the various design characteristics of TMVI and its associated failure mode, implantation technology, delivery methods, first-in-man trials, and pivotal trial summary for the synthesis of recent evidence.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021255241, identifier: CRD42021255241.

CT for Pre- and Postprocedural Evaluation of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) is a catheter-based interventional technique for treating mitral valve disease in patients who are at high risk for open mitral valve surgery and with unfavorable anatomy for minimally invasive edge-to-edge transcatheter mitral valve repair. There are several TMVR devices with different anchoring mechanisms, delivered by either transapical or transseptal approaches. Transthoracic echocardiography is the first-line imaging modality used for characterization and quantification of mitral valve disorders. CT is complementary to echocardiography and has several advantages, including high isotropic spatial resolution, good temporal resolution, large field of view, multiplanar reconstruction capabilities, and rapid turnaround time. CT is essential for multiple aspects of preprocedural planning. Accurate and reproducible techniques to prescribe the mitral annulus at CT have been described from which important measurements such as the area, perimeter, trigone-trigone distance, intercommissural distance, and septolateral distance are obtained. The neo-left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) can be simulated by placing a virtual prosthesis in the CT data to predict the risk of TMVR-induced LVOT obstruction. The anatomy of the landing zone and subvalvular apparatus as well as the relationship of the virtual device to adjacent structures such as the coronary sinus and left circumflex coronary artery can be evaluated. CT also stimulates procedural fluoroscopic angles. CT can be used to evaluate the chest wall for transapical access and the atrial septum for transseptal access. Follow-up CT is useful in identifying complications such as LVOT obstruction, paravalvular leak, pseudoaneurysm, and valve embolization. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2020.

Operator and Institutional Requirements for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Therapies in Australia: a CSANZ and ANZSCTS Position Statement

The expert Position Statement is a description of the requirements for Accreditation for transcatheter mitral valve therapy (TMVT) in Australia. The requirements include the need for a multidisciplinary Heart Team review of individual cases, mandatory reporting of outcome data to a national TMVT Registry, and accreditation of individuals and institutions by the Conjoint Accreditation Committee, the assigned accreditation authority.

Relation of Institutional Mitral Valve Surgical Volume to Surgical and Transcatheter Outcomes in Medicare Patients

There are limited data to support proposed increases to the minimum institutional mitral valve (MV) surgery volume required to begin a transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) program. The current study examined the association between institutional MV procedure volumes and outcomes. All 2017 Medicare fee-for-service patients who received a TMVr or MV surgery procedure were included and analyzed separately. The exposure was institutional MV surgery volume: low (1 to 24), medium (25 to 39) or high (40+). Outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 1-year postdischarge mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalization. For MV surgery patients, in-hospital mortality rates were 6.4% at low-volume, 8.7% at medium-volume and 9.8% at high-volume facilities. Rates were significantly higher for low-volume [OR = 1.50, 95% CI (1.23 to 1.84)] and medium-volume [OR = 1.33, 95% CI (1.06 to 1.67)] compared with high-volume facilities. There was no statistically significant relationship between institutional MV surgery volume and in-hospital mortality for TMVr patients, either at low-volume [OR = 1.52, 95% CI (0.56, 4.13)] or medium-volume [OR = 1.58, 95% CI (0.82, 3.02)] facilities, compared with high-volume facilities. Across all volume categories, in-hospital mortality rates for TMVr patients were relatively low (2.3% on average). For both cohorts, the rates of 1-year mortality and cardiovascular rehospitalizations were not significantly higher at low- or medium-volume MV surgery facilities, as compared with high-volume. In conclusion, among Medicare patients, there was a relation between institutional MV surgery volume and in-hospital mortality for MV surgery patients, but not for TMVr patients.

Association between hospital cardiovascular procedural volumes and transcatheter mitral valve repair outcomes

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular procedural volumes can serve as metrics of hospital infrastructure and quality, and are the basis for thresholds for initiating transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) programs. Whether hospital volumes of TMVr, surgical mitral valve replacement or repair (SMVRr), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are indicators of TMVr quality of care is not known.

METHODS

We used the 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify hospitals that performed at least 5 TMVr procedures. Hospitals were divided into quartiles of TMVr volume. Associations of hospital TMVr, SMVRr, and PCI volumes, as well as SMVRr and PCI outcomes with TMVr outcomes were examined. Outcomes studied were risk-standardized in-hospital mortality rate (RSMR) and 30-day readmission rate (RSRR).

RESULTS

The study included 3404 TMVr procedures performed across 150 hospitals in the US. The median hospital TMVr volume was 17 (IQR 10, 28). The mean hospital-level RSMR and RSRR for TMVr were 3.0% (95% CI 2.5%, 3.4%) and 14.8% (95% CI 14.5%, 15.0%), respectively. There was no significant association between hospital TMVr volume (as quartiles or as a continuous variable) and TMVr RSMR or RSRR (P > 0.05). Similarly, there was weak or no correlation between hospital SMVRr and PCI volumes and outcomes with TMVr RSMR or RSRR (Pearson correlation coefficients, r = -0.199 to 0.269).

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found no relationship between hospital TMVr, SMVRr, and PCI volume and TMVr outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine more appropriate structure and process measures to assess the performance of established and new TMVr centers.

The current diagnosis and treatment of high-risk patients with chronic primary and secondary mitral valve regurgitation

Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is due primarily to either primary degeneration of the mitral valve with Barlow's or fibroelastic disease or is secondary to ischemic or nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Echocardiography is essential to assess MR etiology and severity, the remodeling of cardiac chambers and to characterize longitudinal chamber changes to determine optimal therapies. Surgery is recommended for severe primary MR if persistent symptoms are present or if left ventricle dysfunction is present with an EF <60% or a left ventricle end-systolic diameter ≥40 mm. For secondary MR, therapy of heart failure with vasodilators and diuretics improves forward cardiac output. Coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) should be considered for severe MR due to ischemia. This review summarizes the pathophysiology, the characteristics, the management and the different interventions for high risk patients with chronic primary and secondary MR.

Association of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Availability With Outcomes of Mitral Valve Surgery

Background

Transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr) is currently offered at selected centers that meet certain operator and institutional requirements. We sought to explore the hypothesis that the availability of TMVr is associated with improved outcomes of MV surgery.

Methods and Results

We used the Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify patients who underwent MV surgery at centers with or without TMVr capabilities between January 1 and December 31, 2017. The primary end point was in‐hospital mortality. Secondary end points were postoperative complications, resource use, and 30‐day readmissions. A total of 24 477 patients from 595 centers (446 TMVr, 149 non‐TMVr) were included. There were modest but statistically significant differences in the prevalence of comorbidities between the groups. Patients at non‐TMVr centers had higher unadjusted in‐hospital mortality than those at TMVr centers (5.6% versus 3.6%, P<0.001). They also had higher rates of postoperative complications, longer hospitalizations, higher cost, and fewer home discharges but similar 30‐day readmission rates. After propensity matching, mortality remained higher at non‐TMVr centers (5.5% versus 4.0%, P<0.001). Rates of postoperative complications, prolonged hospitalizations, and nonhome discharges also remained higher. Postoperative mortality was consistently higher at non‐TMVr centers in multiple risk‐adjustment analyses incrementally accounting for differences in risk factors, surgical volume, availability of surgical repair, and excluding concomitant procedures. In the most comprehensive model, surgery at non‐TMVr centers was associated with higher odds of death (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.14–1.73; P=0.002).

Conclusions

Mitral valve surgery at TMVr centers is associated with improved in‐hospital outcomes compared with non‐TMVr centers.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair and Replacement: What's on the Horizon?

There are more than 4 million people affected by mitral regurgitation in both the United States and Europe. Prior to the last decade the only options for treatment of MR were medical therapy and open-heart surgery which left many high risk patients with little option once medically optimized. However, we saw a flood in innovative transcatheter mitral valve interventions. As the technologies are refined these new approaches are considerably less invasive and for some high-risk patients may represent a superior option to conventional open-heart surgery. There are 3 main approaches currently being considered for transcatheter mitral valve repair, edge to edge repair, indirect annuloplasty and direct annuloplasty. There have also been large advancements in recent years in transcatheter replacement of the mitral valve. Although many of these devices are under investigation still, we sought to examine the current state of innovative transcatheter mitral valve technologies.

Mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients with rheumatic heart disease

BACKGROUND

Rheumatic heart disease remains a major cause of cardiovascular death worldwide. Limited real-world nationwide data are available to compare the long-term outcomes between mitral valve repair and replacement in rheumatic heart disease.

METHODS

We identified adult patients with rheumatic heart disease who underwent mitral valve repair or replacement surgery between 2000 and 2013 from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Outcomes of interest included operation-related complications, all-cause mortality, and mitral valve reoperation rate. Propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio was conducted to mitigate possible confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 5086 patients with rheumatic heart disease who underwent mitral valve surgery were identified. Of those, 489 (9.6%) and 4597 (90.4%) underwent mitral valve repair and mitral valve replacement, respectively. After propensity score matching was applied, each group had 467 patients. No difference in risk of in-hospital mortality was observed between groups. With a mean follow-up of 6 years, the mitral valve repair group had comparable risks of all-cause mortality with the mitral valve replacement group (33.4% vs 32.5%; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-1.25). However, higher risks of mitral valve reoperation were observed in the mitral valve repair group (subdistribution hazard ratio, 4.32; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-9.23). Previous percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy was identified as a risk factor of mitral valve reoperation in the repair group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with rheumatic heart disease, mitral valve repair is not associated with superior long-term outcomes. Patients should be carefully selected for mitral valve repair because of its higher reoperation rate, particularly those with previous percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy.