Macrotroponin Probably Contributes to a Difference in Patient Stratification in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndromes

Role of Antitroponin Antibodies and Macrotroponin in the Clinical Interpretation of Cardiac Troponin

Cardiac troponin is extensively used as a biomarker in modern medicine due to its diagnostic capability for myocardial injury, as well as its predictive and prognostic value for cardiac diseases. However, heterophile antibodies, antitroponin antibodies, and macrotroponin complexes can be observed both in seemingly healthy individuals and patients with cardiac diseases, potentially leading to false positive or disproportionate elevation of cTn (cardiac troponin) assay results and introducing discrepancies in clinical interpretations with impact on medical management. In this review article, we describe the possible mechanisms of cTn release and the sources of variations in the assessment of circulating cTn levels. We also explore the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying antitroponin antibody development and discuss the influence exerted by macrotroponin complexes on the results of immunoassays. Additionally, we explore approaches to detect these complexes by presenting various clinical scenarios encountered in routine clinical practice. Finally, unsolved questions about the development, prevalence, and clinical significance of cardiac autoantibodies are discussed.

Practical approaches to the detection of macrotroponin

INTRODUCTION

Macrotroponin is increasingly recognised as a cause of confusion in interpreting high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTnI) results. In this study, we sought to evaluate two practical approaches to detecting macrotroponin. These two approaches are PEG precipitation and SVM (support vector machine) analysis to classify discrepancies between hs-cTn assays.

METHOD

Residual serum and heparin plasma specimens (n = 483) with initially elevated hs-cTnI from hospital and community laboratories were retested on multiple hs-cTn platforms before and after PEG precipitation and Protein A immunoglobulin depletion. SVM analysis was conducted to identify a linear equation that best discriminated specimens with macrotroponin using a combination of results from two different hs-cTn assays.

FINDINGS

The diagnostic performance of PEG precipitation was carried out using Protein A immunoglobulin depletion as the reference comparator. When a cutoff residual activity after PEG precipitation of ≤ 20% was used, this threshold carried a high specificity of 92% (confidence interval 83-98%; n = 189) using the Siemens hs-cTnI Vista assay and 95% specificity (86%-98%; n = 242) using the Abbott hs-cTnI Architect assay. SVM analysis generated a linear equation identifying macrotroponin specimens from results obtained on two hs-cTn assays. This approach can be highly specific, comparable to PEG precipitation when certain assay combinations and concentrations are used.

CONCLUSION

We describe and identify practical alternatives to detecting macrotroponin. These approaches can be optimised for high specificity, reducing the need for more complex laboratory methods.

Antibody-mediated interferences affecting cardiac troponin assays: recommendations from the IFCC Committee on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers

The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry Committee on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers (IFCC C-CB) provides educational documents to facilitate the interpretation and use of cardiac biomarkers in clinical laboratories and practice. Our aim is to improve the understanding of certain key analytical and clinical aspects of cardiac biomarkers and how these may interplay. Measurements of cardiac troponin (cTn) have a prominent place in the clinical work-up of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. It is therefore important that clinical laboratories know how to recognize and assess analytical issues. Two emerging analytical issues resulting in falsely high cTn concentrations, often several fold higher than the upper reference limit (URL), are antibody-mediated assay interference due to long-lived cTn-antibody complexes, called macrotroponin, and crosslinking antibodies that are frequently referred to as heterophilic antibodies. We provide an overview of antibody-mediated cTn assay interference and provide recommendations on how to confirm the interference and interpret the results.

Frequencies of Anti-Troponin I vs Anti-Troponin T Autoantibodies and Degrees of Interference on Troponin Assays

OBJECTIVE

Presence of autoantibodies against troponin I (cTnI) or T (cTnT) has been reported to interfere with troponin assays. However, the extent of the interference with the measurement has not been explored sufficiently. The aims of this study were to examine the frequencies of autoantibodies against troponin I and troponin T and how much these antibodies would affect the measurement.

METHODS

The study comprised 52 subjects who visited Hokkaido University Hospital with suspected ischemic heart diseases. To evaluate the presence of autoantibodies, we calculated the recoveries of cTnI or cTnT after immunoglobulin G depletion, and the distributions of peaks reactive with cTnI or cTnT by high-performance liquid chromatography were examined.

RESULTS

Autoantibodies against cTnI and cTnT were identified in 8 subjects (15.4%) and 1 subject (1.9%), respectively. Although the greatest difference between cTnI and cTnT was 32-fold, the distributions of cTnI-to-cTnT ratios in groups with and without anti-cTnI were not statistically different.

CONCLUSION

Autoantibodies against cTnI were more frequent by several fold than those against cTnT. Their presence did not significantly expand the discrepancy between cTnI and cTnT assays.

Methods for analyzing positive cardiac troponin assay interference

OBJECTIVES

The cardiac damage biomarkers cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and troponin I (cTnI) are used to identify patients with myocardial infarction (MI). To make the correct clinical decisions it is important to identify false positive results due to troponin assay interference. Often interferences are caused by high-molecular weight immunocomplexes called macrotroponin that may result in false troponin elevations because of delayed troponin clearance, or heterophilic antibodies that crosslink troponin assay antibodies and generate troponin-independent signals.

DESIGN & METHODS

We describe and compare four methods for cTnI assay interference analysis using a protein G spin column method, gel filtration chromatography and two versions of a sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation for cTnI assay interference analysis on five patients with confirmed cTnI interference and one MI patient without cTnI interference from our troponin interference referral center.

RESULTS

The protein G spin column method had a high between run variability but was still able to identify all five patients with cTnI interference. The sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation methods and the gel filtration method had simlar performancec and correctly identified the immunocomplexes that caused the cTnI interference.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience is that these methods are sufficient to safely confirm or exclude positive cTnI assay interference.

Effect of Macrotroponin in a Cohort of Community Patients with Elevated Cardiac Troponin

BACKGROUND

Macrotroponin is an important cause of discrepancy between current high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays, however, its clinical significance is unclear. This study examined the effects of macrotroponin and repeat testing by different hs-cTnI assays in a cohort of community patients with elevated hs-cTnI.

METHODS

The first residual serum specimen from each patient in the community admitted to hospital with elevated hs-cTnI (Siemens hs-cTnI Centaur) was retested after immunoglobulin depletion and by 5 other hs-cTn assays. Low recovery of cTnI (<40%) following immunoglobulin depletion was considered as macrotroponin. A retrospective chart review was performed for these participants. Investigator-adjudicated diagnosis served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

In our cohort of community patients with elevated troponin (n = 188), participants with macrotroponin (n = 99) often had a multifactorial or indeterminate myocardial injury (56% vs 25%) and were less likely to have acute coronary syndrome (9% vs 28%). On repeat testing of cTn on other platforms, better diagnostic performance (c-statistics) for ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac causes was observed on the Beckman Access hs-cTnI (0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.81) or the Abbott hs-cTnI Architect (0.75; CI 0.68-0.82) compared to the Siemens hs-cTnI Vista (0.62; CI 0.54-0.70; P < 0.05). This could be attributed to differences in assay reactivity for macrotroponin. Interestingly, better diagnostic performance was observed in patients without macrotroponin. Although a small number of deaths occurred (n = 16), participants with macrotroponin had better overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In the low-risk setting, the presence of macrotroponin was clinically associated with multifactorial or indeterminate causes of troponin elevation.

Identification of macrotroponin T: findings from a case report and non-reproducible troponin T results

OBJECTIVES

Macrotroponin is due to cardiac troponin (cTn) binding to endogenous cTn autoantibodies. While previous studies showed a high incidence of macrotroponin affecting cTnI assays, reports of macrotroponin T, particularly without cTnI reactivity, have been rare. Although the clinical significance of macrotroponin is not fully understood, macroenzymes and complexes are recognised to cause confusion in interpretation of laboratory results. The potential for adverse clinical consequences due to misinterpretation of affected results is very high.

METHODS

We describe four cases of macrotroponin T with persistently low high sensitivity cTnT (hs-cTnT) by the 9 min compared to the 18 min variant of the assay. Three cases were serendipitously identified due to the use of a lot number of Roche hs-cTnT affected by non-reproducible results, necessitating measurement of cTnT in duplicate. We identified and characterised these macrotroponin specimens by immunoglobulin depletion (Protein A and PEG precipitation), mixing studies with EDTA and recombinant cTnT.

RESULTS

In cases of macro-cTnT, a lower result occurred on the hs-cTnT using the 9 min compared to 18 min variant assay (ratio of 9-18 min hs-cTnT <0.80). Mixing studies with recombinant cTnT or EDTA demonstrated a difference in recovery vs. controls. One of these patients demonstrated a high molecular weight complex for cTnI and cTnT demonstrating a macrocomplex involving both cTn. This patient demonstrated a rise and fall in cTn when measured by several commercial assays consistent with genuine acute cardiac injury.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several cases of macro-cTnT and described associated clinical and biochemical features.