Clinical Risk Score to Predict Pathogenic Genotypes in Patients With Dilated Cardiomyopathy

THBru attenuates diabetic cardiomyopathy by inhibiting RAGE-dependent inflammation

Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a complication of diabetes mellitus characterized by heart failure and cardiac remodeling. Previous studies show that tetrahydroberberrubine (THBru) retrogrades cardiac aging by promoting PHB2-mediated mitochondrial autophagy and prevents peritoneal adhesion by suppressing inflammation. In this study we investigated whether THBru exerted protective effect against DCM in db/db mice and potential mechanisms. Eight-week-old male db/db mice were administered THBru (25, 50 mg·kg-1·d-1, i.g.) for 12 weeks. Cardiac function was assessed using echocardiography. We showed that THBru administration significantly improved both cardiac systolic and diastolic function, as well as attenuated cardiac remodeling in db/db mice. In primary neonatal mouse cardiomyocytes (NMCMs), THBru (20, 40 μM) dose-dependently ameliorated high glucose (HG)-induced cell damage, hypertrophy, inflammatory cytokines release, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Using Autodock, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and DARTS analyses, we revealed that THBru bound to the domain of the receptor for advanced glycosylation end products (RAGE), subsequently leading to inactivation of the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway. Importantly, overexpression of RAGE in NMCMs reversed HG-induced inactivation of the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway and subsequently counteracted the beneficial effects mediated by THBru. We conclude that THBru acts as an inhibitor of RAGE, leading to inactivation of the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway. This action effectively alleviates the inflammatory responses and oxidative stress in cardiomyocytes, ultimately leading to ameliorated DCM.

Impact of DCM-Causing Genetic Background on Long-Term Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and complete left bundle branch block benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, a large heterogeneity of response to CRT is described. Several predictors of response to CRT have been identified, but the role of the underlying genetic background is still poorly explored.

OBJECTIVES

In the present study, the authors sought to define differences in LV remodeling and outcome prediction after CRT when stratifying patients according to the presence or absence of DCM-causing genetic background.

METHODS

From our center, 74 patients with DCM subjected to CRT and available genetic testing were retrospectively enrolled. Carriers of causative monogenic variants in validated DCM-causing genes, and/or with documented family history of DCM, were classified as affected by genetically determined disease (GEN+DCM) (n = 25). Alternatively, by idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (idDCM) (n = 49). The primary outcome was long-term LV remodeling and prevalence of super response to CRT (evaluated at 24-48 months after CRT); the secondary outcome was heart failure-related death/heart transplant/LV assist device.

RESULTS

GEN+DCM and idDCM patients were homogeneous at baseline with the exception of QRS duration, longer in idDCM. The median follow-up was 55 months. Long-term LV reverse remodeling and the prevalence of super response were significantly higher in the idDCM group (27% in idDCM vs 5% in GEN+DCM; P = 0.025). The heart failure-related death/heart transplant/LV assist device outcome occurred more frequently in patients with GEN+DCM (53% vs 24% in idDCM; P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Genotyping contributes to the risk stratification of patients with DCM undergoing CRT implantation in terms of LV remodeling and outcomes.

Emerging Concepts of Mechanisms Controlling Cardiac Tension: Focus on Familial Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) and Sarcomere-Directed Therapies

Novel therapies for the treatment of familial dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) are lacking. Shaping research directions to clinical needs is critical. Triggers for the progression of the disorder commonly occur due to specific gene variants that affect the production of sarcomeric/cytoskeletal proteins. Generally, these variants cause a decrease in tension by the myofilaments, resulting in signaling abnormalities within the micro-environment, which over time result in structural and functional maladaptations, leading to heart failure (HF). Current concepts support the hypothesis that the mutant sarcomere proteins induce a causal depression in the tension-time integral (TTI) of linear preparations of cardiac muscle. However, molecular mechanisms underlying tension generation particularly concerning mutant proteins and their impact on sarcomere molecular signaling are currently controversial. Thus, there is a need for clarification as to how mutant proteins affect sarcomere molecular signaling in the etiology and progression of DCM. A main topic in this controversy is the control of the number of tension-generating myosin heads reacting with the thin filament. One line of investigation proposes that this number is determined by changes in the ratio of myosin heads in a sequestered super-relaxed state (SRX) or in a disordered relaxed state (DRX) poised for force generation upon the Ca2+ activation of the thin filament. Contrasting evidence from nanometer-micrometer-scale X-ray diffraction in intact trabeculae indicates that the SRX/DRX states may have a lesser role. Instead, the proposal is that myosin heads are in a basal OFF state in relaxation then transfer to an ON state through a mechano-sensing mechanism induced during early thin filament activation and increasing thick filament strain. Recent evidence about the modulation of these mechanisms by protein phosphorylation has also introduced a need for reconsidering the control of tension. We discuss these mechanisms that lead to different ideas related to how tension is disturbed by levels of mutant sarcomere proteins linked to the expression of gene variants in the complex landscape of DCM. Resolving the various mechanisms and incorporating them into a unified concept is crucial for gaining a comprehensive understanding of DCM. This deeper understanding is not only important for diagnosis and treatment strategies with small molecules, but also for understanding the reciprocal signaling processes that occur between cardiac myocytes and their micro-environment. By unraveling these complexities, we can pave the way for improved therapeutic interventions for managing DCM.

Assessment of ICD eligibility in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy patients: a position statement by the Task Force of the Dutch Society of Cardiology

International guidelines recommend implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35% despite optimal medical therapy and a life expectancy of more than 1 year with good functional status. We propose refinement of these recommendations in patients with NICM, with careful consideration of additional risk parameters for both arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic death. These additional parameters include late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing for high-risk genetic variants to further assess arrhythmic risk, and age, comorbidities and sex for assessment of non-arrhythmic mortality risk. Moreover, several risk modifiers should be taken into account, such as concomitant arrhythmias that may affect LVEF (atrial fibrillation, premature ventricular beats) and resynchronisation therapy. Even though currently no valid cut-off values have been established, the proposed approach provides a more careful consideration of risks that may result in withholding ICD implantation in patients with low arrhythmic risk and substantial non-arrhythmic mortality risk.

Penetrance of Dilated Cardiomyopathy in Genotype-Positive Relatives

BACKGROUND

Disease penetrance in genotype-positive (G+) relatives of families with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and the characteristics associated with DCM onset in these individuals are unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the penetrance of new DCM diagnosis in G+ relatives and to identify factors associated with DCM development.

METHODS

The authors evaluated 779 G+ patients (age 35.8 ± 17.3 years; 459 [59%] females; 367 [47%] with variants in TTN) without DCM followed at 25 Spanish centers.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 37.1 months (Q1-Q3: 16.3-63.8 months), 85 individuals (10.9%) developed DCM (incidence rate of 2.9 per 100 person-years; 95% CI: 2.3-3.5 per 100 person-years). DCM penetrance and age at DCM onset was different according to underlying gene group (log-rank P = 0.015 and P <0.01, respectively). In a multivariable model excluding CMR parameters, independent predictors of DCM development were: older age (HR per 1-year increase: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.0-1.04), an abnormal electrocardiogram (HR: 2.13; 95% CI: 1.38-3.29); presence of variants in motor sarcomeric genes (HR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.05-3.50); lower left ventricular ejection fraction (HR per 1% increase: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.82-0.90) and larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (HR per 1-mm increase: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.06-1.13). Multivariable analysis in individuals with cardiac magnetic resonance and late gadolinium enhancement assessment (n = 360, 45%) identified late gadolinium enhancement as an additional independent predictor of DCM development (HR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.43-4.45).

CONCLUSIONS

Following a first negative screening, approximately 11% of G+ relatives developed DCM during a median follow-up of 3 years. Older age, an abnormal electrocardiogram, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, increased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, motor sarcomeric genetic variants, and late gadolinium enhancement are associated with a higher risk of developing DCM.

Screening for dilated cardiomyopathy in immediate family members: to whom, how, when (and where)

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is defined by the presence of left ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction in the absence of coronary artery disease, valvular disease, congenital heart disease, or altered haemodynamic conditions. Dilated cardiomyopathy can recognize multiple aetiologies, including infectious processes, effect of toxic substances, immunological mechanisms, and genetic causes. In recent years, many genes coding for proteins involved in the structure and function of the cardiomyocytes have been associated with the development of DCM, making the identification of familial forms increasingly frequent. At the same time, an ever-increasing use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging has made it possible to identify early morpho-functional alterations in subjects with initial forms of the disease, or carriers of pathogenic genetic variants. The increasingly in-depth understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms operating in DCM has also favoured the development of new therapeutic strategies including drugs with molecular targets and gene therapies. In this panorama, screening of family members of patients affected by DCM represents an important tool for early diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic stratification. In relation to its clinical relevance and its complexity, it is important that family screening and follow-up of identified patients are carried out in units dedicated to the treatment and study of cardiomyopathies.

Challenges and Applications of Genetic Testing in Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Genotype, Phenotype and Clinical Implications

Genetic tests for dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) have a diagnostic yield of up to 40%, but there is significant genetic heterogeneity and other challenges, such as variable expressivity and incomplete penetrance. Pedigree analysis is essential for distinguishing between sporadic and familial DCM cases by assessing family history. Familial DCM yields higher results in genetic testing, but sporadic DCM does not rule out the possibility of a genetic cause. Some genes have specific phenotypes, with the Lamin gene ( LMNA ) being associated with a phenotype of malignant arrhythmias and advanced heart failure (HF). The presence of a causal genetic variant can also aid in prognostic evaluation, identifying more severe cases with lower rates of reverse remodeling (RR) compared to individuals with a negative genotype. Current guidelines recommend genetic evaluation and counseling for individuals with DCM, along with cascade screening in first-degree relatives in cases where one or more variants are identified, offering an opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment. Relatives with a positive genotype and negative phenotype are candidates for serial evaluation, with frequency varying by age. Genotype also assists in individualized recommendations for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement and advice regarding physical activity and family planning. Ongoing studies are progressively elucidating the details of genotype/phenotype relationships for a large number of variants, making molecular genetics increasingly integrated into clinical practice.

State-of-the-art document on optimal contemporary management of cardiomyopathies

Cardiomyopathies represent significant contributors to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Over the past decades, a progress has occurred in characterization of the genetic background and major pathophysiological mechanisms, which has been incorporated into a more nuanced diagnostic approach and risk stratification. Furthermore, medications targeting core disease processes and/or their downstream adverse effects have been introduced for several cardiomyopathies. Combined with standard care and prevention of sudden cardiac death, these novel and emerging targeted therapies offer a possibility of improving the outcomes in several cardiomyopathies. Therefore, the aim of this document is to summarize practical approaches to the treatment of cardiomyopathies, which includes the evidence-based novel therapeutic concepts and established principles of care, tailored to the individual patient aetiology and clinical presentation of the cardiomyopathy. The scope of the document encompasses contemporary treatment of dilated, hypertrophic, restrictive and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. It was based on an expert consensus reached at the Heart Failure Association online Workshop, held on 18 March 2021.

Diagnostic yield of genetic testing in a multinational heterogeneous cohort of 2088 DCM patients

Background

Familial dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) causes heart failure and may lead to heart transplantation. DCM is typically a monogenic disorder with autosomal dominant inheritance. Currently disease-causing variants have been reported in over 60 genes that encode proteins in sarcomeres, nuclear lamina, desmosomes, cytoskeleton, and mitochondria. Over half of the patients undergoing comprehensive genetic testing are left without a molecular diagnosis even when patient selection follows strict DCM criteria.

Methods and results

This study was a retrospective review of patients referred for genetic testing at Blueprint Genetics due to suspected inherited DCM. Next generation sequencing panels included 23-316 genes associated with cardiomyopathies and other monogenic cardiac diseases. Variants were considered diagnostic if classified as pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP). Of the 2,088 patients 514 (24.6%) obtained a molecular diagnosis; 534 LP/P variants were observed across 45 genes, 2.7% (14/514) had two diagnostic variants in dominant genes. Nine copy number variants were identified: two multigene and seven intragenic. Diagnostic variants were observed most often in TTN (45.3%), DSP (6.7%), LMNA (6.7%), and MYH7 (5.2%). Clinical characteristics independently associated with molecular diagnosis were: a lower age at diagnosis, family history of DCM, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, absence of left bundle branch block, and the presence of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Conclusions

Panel testing provides good diagnostic yield in patients with clinically suspected DCM. Causative variants were identified in 45 genes. In minority, two diagnostic variants were observed in dominant genes. Our results support the use of genetic panels in clinical settings in DCM patients with suspected genetic etiology.

Dilated cardiomyopathy: causes, mechanisms, and current and future treatment approaches

Dilated cardiomyopathy is conventionally defined as the presence of left ventricular or biventricular dilatation or systolic dysfunction in the absence of abnormal loading conditions (eg, primary valve disease) or significant coronary artery disease sufficient to cause ventricular remodelling. This definition has been recognised as overly restrictive, as left ventricular hypokinesis without dilation could be the initial presentation of dilated cardiomyopathy. The causes of dilated cardiomyopathy comprise genetic (primary dilated cardiomyopathy) or acquired factors (secondary dilated cardiomyopathy). Acquired factors include infections, toxins, cancer treatment, endocrinopathies, pregnancy, tachyarrhythmias, and immune-mediated diseases. 5-15% of patients with acquired dilated cardiomyopathy harbour a likely pathogenic or pathogenic gene variant (ie, gene mutation). Therefore, the diagnostic tests and therapeutic approach should always consider both genetic and acquired factors. This Seminar will focus on the current multidimensional diagnostic and therapeutic approach and discuss the underlying pathophysiology that could drive future treatments aiming to repair or replace the existing gene mutation, or target the specific inflammatory, metabolic, or pro-fibrotic drivers of genetic or acquired dilated cardiomyopathy.

The Genetic Evaluation of Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a common cause of heart failure and is the primary indication for heart transplantation. A genetic etiology can be found in 20-35% of patients with DCM, especially in those with a family history of cardiomyopathy or sudden cardiac death at an early age. With advancements in genome sequencing, the understanding of genotype-phenotype relationships in DCM has expanded with over 60 genes implicated in the disease. Subsequently, these findings have increased adoption of genetic testing in the management of DCM, which has allowed for improved risk stratification and identification of at risk family members. In this review, we discuss the genetic evaluation of DCM with a focus on practical genetic testing considerations, genotype-phenotype associations, and insights into upcoming personalized therapies.

Risk of Arrhythmic Death in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) is common and patients are at significant risk for early mortality secondary to ventricular arrhythmias. Current guidelines recommend implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy to decrease sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. However, in randomized clinical trials comprised solely of patients with NICM, primary prevention ICDs did not confer significant mortality benefit. Moreover, left ventricular ejection fraction has limited sensitivity and specificity for predicting SCD. Therefore, precise risk stratification algorithms are needed to define those at the highest risk of SCD. This review examines mechanisms of sudden arrhythmic death in patients with NICM, discusses the role of ICD therapy and treatment of heart failure for prevention of SCD in patients with NICM, examines the role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computational modeling for SCD risk stratification, and proposes new strategies to guide future clinical trials on SCD risk assessment in patients with NICM.

Cardiac Inflammation in Adult-Onset Genetic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) has a genetic cause in up to 40% of cases, with differences in disease penetrance and clinical presentation, due to different exogeneous triggers and implicated genes. Cardiac inflammation can be the consequence of an exogeneous trigger, subsequently unveiling a phenotype. The study aimed to determine cardiac inflammation in a cohort of genetic DCM patients and investigate whether it associated with a younger disease onset. The study included 113 DCM patients with a genetic etiology, of which 17 had cardiac inflammation as diagnosed in an endomyocardial biopsy. They had a significant increased cardiac infiltration of white blood, cytotoxic T, and T-helper cells (p < 0.05). Disease expression was at a younger age in those patients with cardiac inflammation, compared to those without inflammation (p = 0.015; 50 years (interquartile range (IQR) 42-53) versus 53 years (IQR 46-61). However, cardiac inflammation was not associated with a higher incidence of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or life-threatening arrhythmias (hazard ratio 0.85 [0.35-2.07], p = 0.74). Cardiac inflammation is associated with an earlier disease onset in patients with genetic DCM. This might indicate that myocarditis is an exogeneous trigger unveiling a phenotype at a younger age in patients with a genetic susceptibility, or that cardiac inflammation resembles a 'hot-phase' of early-onset disease.

Pragmatic electrocardiogram tracings in non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy: diagnostic and prognostic role

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a primitive heart muscle disease characterized by a great heterogeneous aetiology and prognostic outcome. Dilated cardiomyopathy is an umbrella term encompassing different aetiologies that might require specific treatments. It principally affects young and male adults, with high-risk arrhythmic competitive risk. Unfortunately, the prevention of major ventricular arrhythmic events remains a clinical challenge. In the era of advanced multimodality imaging and widely available genetic testing, electrocardiogram (ECG) continues to represent a reliable diagnostic tool, for specific work up of every single patient. However, approaching DCM patients, only a cardiomyopathy-oriented reading makes the role of ECG central in the management of DCM, both for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic management. In this paper, we present four ECGs of four different DCM patients, in order to guide a cardiomyopathy-oriented ECG reading, emphasizing its impact in an early, cost-effective, and personalized diagnostic and prognostic work up in this specific setting.

Editor-in-Chief's Top Picks From 2022

Each week, I record audio summaries for every paper in JACC, as well as an issue summary. This process has become a true labor of love due to the time they require, but I am motivated by the sheer number of listeners (16 million plus), and it has allowed me to familiarize myself with every paper that we publish. Thus, I have selected the top 100 papers (both Original Investigations and Review Articles) from distinct specialties each year. In addition to my personal choices, I have included papers that have been the most accessed or downloaded on our websites, as well as those selected by the JACC Editorial Board members. In order to present the full breadth of this important research in a consumable fashion, we will present these abstracts in this issue of JACC, as well as their Central Illustrations and podcasts. The highlights comprise the following sections: Basic & Translational Research, Cardiac Failure & Myocarditis, Cardiomyopathies & Genetics, Cardio-Oncology, Congenital Heart Disease, Coronary Disease & Interventions, Coronavirus, Hypertension, Imaging, Metabolic & Lipid Disorders, Neurovascular Disease & Dementia, Promoting Health & Prevention, Rhythm Disorders & Thromboembolism, and Valvular Heart Disease.^1-100.

Precision and genomic medicine for dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Cardiomyopathy develops through an interaction of genetic and environmental factors. The clinical manifestations of both dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy are diverse, but genetic testing defines the causative genes in about half of cases and can predict clinical prognosis. It has become clear that cardiomyopathy is caused not only by single rare variants but also by combinations of multiple common variants, and genome-wide genetic research is important for accurate disease risk assessment. Single-cell analysis research aimed at understanding the pathophysiology of cardiomyopathy is progressing rapidly, and it is expected that genomic analysis and single-cell molecular profiling will be combined to contribute to more detailed stratification of cardiomyopathy.