Predictive Value of the Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Cancer Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

The Use of the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio in Predicting Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Mortality

AIM

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are simple biomarkers that reflect systemic inflammation and are associated with adverse cardiovascular disease outcomes. The utility of NLR and PLR for risk prediction following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is not clear.

METHOD

We retrospectively analysed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent TAVI at a tertiary hospital from 2009 to 2022. Baseline demographics, NLR, PLR and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) scores were obtained. The 30-day and 1-year survival rates were analysed using a logistic regression model while overall survival was analysed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of survival were calculated using a Cox-hazards regression model and presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Overall, 367 patients were included in this study (mean age 84 years, 51% male). Median follow-up was 19 months (interquartile range 8.8-40 months) with a median survival of 7.2 years (interquartile range 3.5-10.3 years). NLR was associated with 30-day mortality (OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.25-2.68; p<0.01). PLRs marginally predicted 1-year mortality (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.02). However, only the STS-PROM score significantly predicted overall survival (hazard ratio 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.12; p=0.03) after adjustment for NLR and PLR.

CONCLUSIONS

NLR is associated with 30-day mortality following TAVI. PLR was not a clinically significant predictor of mortality after TAVI. Only the STS-PROM score remained a significant predictor of overall survival.

Impact of cancer in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Owing to the minimally invasive nature of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), TAVR seems to be preferred in patients with cancer; however, related research on the clinical efficacy and safety of TAVR in patients with cancer and severe aortic stenosis is limited, and conclusions are controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with cancer who underwent TAVR.

Method and results

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the clinical outcomes in patients with and without cancer who underwent TAVR. We systematically reviewed and analyzed 15 studies (195,658 patients) published in PubMed and Cochrane Library databases between January 2022 and January 2023. The primary outcomes were short-term (in-hospital or 30-day) and long-term (≥12 months) mortality. The prevalence of current or previous cancer in the patients undergoing TAVR was 19.8 % (38,695 patients). Patients with cancer had a lower risk of short-term mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.69, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.61-0.77, P < 0.001) but a higher risk of long-term mortality (OR 1.54, 95 % CI 1.35-1.76, P < 0.001) than those without cancer. Patients with cancer had a lower incidence of postprocedural stroke and acute kidney injury but a higher incidence of pacemaker implantation than patients without cancer.

Conclusions

Patients with cancer undergoing TAVR have a good short-term prognosis and acceptable perioperative complications compared with patients without cancer. However, the long-term outcomes are contingent on cancer survival.

Association between haematological parameters and outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation at mid-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) often have multiple comorbidities, such as anaemia and chronic inflammatory disorders. We sought to investigate the association between preoperative and postoperative haematological parameters and clinical outcomes in TAVI patients at mid-term follow-up.

METHODS

In the present study, consecutive patients (N=908) who underwent TAVI at the Cleveland Clinic between 2017 and 2019 with available complete blood counts were studied. Data were collected on preoperative and postoperative anaemia and elevations in neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR). Survival analysis was used to study the association of haematologic parameters with all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).

RESULTS

We found that preoperative anaemia and elevated NLR were significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (aHR=1.6 (95% CI: 1.1 to 2.0) and 1.4 (95% CI: 1.1 to 1.6), respectively) and MACCE (aHR=1.9 (95% CI: 1.3 to 2.8) and 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1 to 2.4), respectively). While an elevated preoperative PLR was not associated with increased mortality risk, it had a significant association with MACCE risk (aHR: 1.6 (95% CI: 1.1 to 2.4)). Further, postoperative anaemia, elevated NLR and PLR were associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality and MACCE.

CONCLUSION

Pathological alterations in haematological parameters were associated with higher risks of post-TAVI mortality and MACCE at mid-term follow-up. Our findings advocate for further incorporating haematological parameters in the preoperative evaluation of TAVI candidates.

Comparing Clinical Outcomes on Oncology Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To compare the clinical outcomes of cancer and non-cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Methods

A computer-based search in PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang databases from their date of inception to October 2021, together with reference screening, was performed to identify eligible clinical trials. Two reviewers independently screened the articles, extracted data, and evaluated their quality. Review Manger 5.3 and Stata 12.0 software were used for meta-analysis.

Results

The selected 11 cohort studies contained 182,645 patients, including 36,283 patients with cancer and 146,362 patients without cancer. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the 30-day mortality [OR = 0.68, 95%CI (0.63,0.74), I 2= 0, P < 0.00001] of patients with cancer in the AS group was lower than those in the non-cancer group; 1-year mortality [OR = 1.49, 95%CI(1.19,1.88), I 2= 58%, P = 0.0006] and late mortality [OR = 1.52, 95%CI(1.26,1.84), I 2= 55%, P < 0.0001] of patients with cancer in the AS group was higher than those in the non-cancer group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the stroke [OR = 0.77, 95%CI (0.72, 0.82), I 2= 0, P < 0.00001] and the acute kidney injury [OR = 0.78, 95%CI (0.68, 0.90), I 2= 77%, P = 0.0005] of patients with cancer in the AS group was lower than those in the non-cancer group. The results of the meta-analysis showed no statistical difference in cardiovascular mortality, bleeding events, myocardial infarction, vascular complication, and device success rate.

Conclusion

It is more effective and safer in patients with cancer with severe AS who were undergoing TAVI. However, compared with patients with no cancer, this is still high in terms of long-term mortality, and further study of the role of TAVI in patients with cancer with AS is necessary.

Systematic Review Registration

Identifier [INPLASY CRD: 202220009].

Prognostic impact of cancer history in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

BACKGROUND

The benefit of TAVI in cancer patients is currently unclear.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to investigate prognostic impact of cancer status (active cancer or previous cancer) in severe aortic stenosis (AS) patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

METHODS

Consecutive TAVI patients in the Heart Center Bonn were enrolled and we stratified the patients into three groups: current cancer (active cancer), non-current cancer (previous cancer), or no cancer. The primary outcome was all-cause death within a 5-year follow-up. We evaluated mean aortic pressure gradient (mPG) values following TAVI (baseline mPG) and at the final follow-up (follow-up mPG).

RESULTS

In total, 1568 TAVI patients were eligible and 298 patients (19.0%) had active or previous cancer. At the 5-year follow-up, cancer patients had a significantly worse prognosis than non-cancer patients (log rank, P < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis, previous cancer was a significant predictor for 5-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.56; P < 0.001). Estimated mortality rates at 5-year follow-up rates among active cancer, previous cancer, and non-cancer were 84.0%, 65.8%, and 50.2% (long-rank P < 0.001), respectively. The hazard ratios of active cancer and previous cancer for 5-year mortality were 2.79 (P < 0.001) and 1.38 (P = 0.019) compared to non-cancer patients. We found significantly higher mPG during follow-up than at baseline in cancer patients (follow-up 8.10 vs baseline 7.40 mmHg; Wilcoxon P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Active, and also previous, cancer status are associated with less beneficial long-term prognosis in TAVI patients.