Uninterrupted Direct Oral Anticoagulant and Warfarin Administration in Elderly Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparison With Younger Patients

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Elderly Patients: an Updated Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

Age is a relevant risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) and is associated with increased recurrence rates in the setting of rhythm control. Catheter ablation is increasingly advocated in elderly despite conflicting data regarding its efficacy and safety in this patient cohort. Therefore, we aimed to analyse currently available evidence regarding catheter ablation for AF in patients ≥ 75 years old compared with younger patients.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search and meta-analysis on efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in patients ≥ 75 years old with AF. Primary efficacy and safety end points were first recurrence of atrial arrhythmia after first-time ablation and occurrence of death, stroke, or any procedure-related complication. Secondary outcomes included procedure and fluoroscopy time.

RESULTS

We identified 301 potentially relevant studies, of which 39 underwent detailed analysis. A total of 19 studies (MINORS score ≥ 13) reporting on 108,419 patients (101,844 < 75 years, 6,575 ≥ 75 years of age) undergoing first-time catheter ablation for AF were included. Risk of arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation (39% vs 32%, relative risk [RR] 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-1.41; P = 0.001) and occurrence of safety end points (10.8% vs 8.5%; RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.53-1.76; P < 0.00001) were significantly higher in patients ≥ 75 years of age than in younger patients. There was no difference concerning procedure (P = 0.33) or fluoroscopy time (P = 0.91) between younger and elderly patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients ≥ 75 years of age, catheter ablation for AF has higher risk of arrhythmia recurrence and is associated with an increased risk of procedure-related complications and safety end point occurrence compared with younger patients.

Prevention of cerebral thromboembolism by oral anticoagulation with dabigatran after pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: the ODIn-AF trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) following successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. Prospective data are missing. The ODIn-AF study aimed to evaluate the effect of OAC on the incidence of silent cerebral embolic events and clinically relevant cardioembolic events in patients at intermediate to high risk for embolic events, free from AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded endpoint interventional trial enrolled patients who were scheduled for PVI to treat paroxysmal or persistent AF. Six months after PVI, AF-free patients were randomized to receive either continued OAC with dabigatran or no OAC. The primary endpoint was the incidence of new silent micro- and macro-embolic lesions detected on brain MRI at 12 months of follow-up compared to baseline. Safety analysis included bleedings, clinically evident cardioembolic, and serious adverse events (SAE).

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2021, 200 patients were randomized into 2 study arms (on OAC: n = 99, off OAC: n = 101). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of new cerebral microlesions between the on OAC and off OAC arm [2 (2%) versus 0 (0%); P = 0.1517] after 12 months. MRI showed no new macro-embolic lesion, no clinical apparent strokes were present in both groups. SAE were more frequent in the OAC arm [on OAC n = 34 (31.8%), off OAC n = 18 (19.4%); P = 0.0460]; bleedings did not differ.

CONCLUSION

Discontinuation of OAC after successful PVI was not found to be associated with an elevated risk of cerebral embolic events compared with continued OAC after a follow-up of 12 months.

Treatment Options in AF Patients with Cancer; Focus on Catheter Ablation

Longer life expectancy along with advancements in cancer and atrial fibrillation (AF) therapies and treatment strategies have led to an increase in the number of individuals with both diseases. As a result, the complicated management of these patients has become crucial, necessitating individualised treatment that considers the bi-directional relationship between these two diseases. On the one hand, giving appropriate pharmaceutical therapy is exceptionally difficult, considering the recognised thromboembolic risk posed by AF and malignancy, as well as the haemorrhagic risk posed by cancer. The alternative pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation, on the other hand, has been inadequately explored in the cancer patient population; there is yet inadequate data to allow the clinician to unambiguously select patients that can undertake this therapeutic intervention. The goal of this review is to compile the most valuable data and supporting evidence about the characteristics, care, and therapy of cancer patients with AF. Specifically, we will evaluate the pharmaceutical options for a proper anticoagulant therapy, as well as the feasibility and safety of PVI in this population.

Catheter Ablation in Adult Congenital Heart Disease on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation: Is it safe? - Data from a large single center study

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients is a critical treatment strategy for complex arrhythmias including atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial tachycardia (AT). In addition to vitamin K antagonists (VKA), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used in this patient population.

OBJECTIVE

The study assessed the safety of catheter ablation in ACHD patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA or DOAC examining thromboembolic, bleeding or vascular access complications.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 234 ACHD patients with simple (n=83), moderate (n=66) or complex (n=85) CHD (mean age 46 years) undergoing 368 ablation procedures on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA (45.4%) or DOAC (54.6 %) was undertaken. Arrhythmias were AF (n=97, right AT (n=181), left AT (n=65) or a combination of AF and AT (n=25).

RESULTS

No thromboembolic complications occurred. There were major complications in 4 patients (1.1%; VKA n=1, DOAC n=3) including retroperitoneal hematoma (n=2) and AV fistula requiring surgical treatment (n=2). Minor bleeding or vascular access complications occurred in 46 cases (12.5%) including hematomas >5cm (n=26), AV fistulas (not requiring surgical intervention) (n=13) or pseudoaneurysms (n=7; thrombin injection in 3/7). Overall, no significant difference was found between the DOAC (14.9%) and the VKA group (12. 0%; p=0.411).

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation in ACHD patients on uninterrupted oral anticoagulation with VKA or DOAC is feasible and safe. No thromboembolic events occurred, and major bleeding or vascular access complications were rare. No significant difference regarding minor bleeding or vascular access complications between patients on DOAC or VKA were found.

Factors associated with bleeding events during catheter ablation with uninterrupted periprocedural edoxaban for atrial fibrillation: a subanalysis of the KYU-RABLE study

BACKGROUND

Data are limited on patient background characteristics associated with catheter ablation (CA)-related bleeding events in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation receiving uninterrupted periprocedural edoxaban. This subanalysis of the KYU-RABLE study focused on univariate and multivariate analyses to identify correlations between bleeding events and baseline patient demographics and CA-related characteristics.

METHODS

Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) enrolled from the KYU-RABLE study were included in the study. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to investigate the correlation of major, minor, and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events with the patient baseline data at enrollment, and with CA procedures.

RESULTS

A total of 513 NVAF patients were included in the full analysis set. Univariate analysis showed that the incidence of the bleeding events was higher in patients with HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 compared with those with a score < 3 (odds ratio [OR]: 9.48, 95% CI: 2.36-38.01; p = 0.002), in those with creatinine clearance (CrCL) ≤50 mL/min compared with those with CrCL > 50 mL/min (OR: 10.59, 95% CI: 3.65-30.79; p < 0.0001), and in those receiving edoxaban 30 mg compared with those receiving edoxaban 60 mg (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 1.18-10.38; p = 0.025). Multivariate analysis showed that HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 (OR: 7.93, 95% CI: 1.66-37.88; p = 0.0094) and CrCl ≤ 50 mL/min (OR: 7.78, 95% CI: 2.17-27.90; p = 0.0016) were significant predictors of bleeding events among KYU-RABLE patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These predictors of CA-related bleeding events may allow informed decision-making and better AF patient selection for CA with uninterrupted periprocedural edoxaban.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

KYU-RABLE, UMIN000029693 . Registered 1 December 2017.

Optimizing prognosis in atrial fibrillation: A call to action in Portugal

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common arrhythmia in the adult population worldwide, represents a significant burden in terms of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity and has repercussions on health economics. Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is key to stroke prevention in AF and, in recent years, results from landmark clinical trials of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have triggered a paradigm shift in thrombocardiology. Despite these advances, there is still a significant residual vascular risk associated with silent AF, bleeding, premature sudden death and heart failure. The authors review AF epidemiologic data, the importance of new tools for early AF detection, the current role of catheter ablation for rhythm control in AF, the state-of-the-art in periprocedural OAC, the optimal management of major bleeding, the causes of residual premature death and future strategies for improvements in AF prognosis.

Changes in plasma concentrations of edoxaban and coagulation biomarkers according to thromboembolic risk and atrial fibrillation type in patients undergoing catheter ablation: Subanalysis of KYU-RABLE

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) can be associated with a risk of thromboembolism and bleeding. We recently demonstrated that uninterrupted edoxaban with one dose delayed on the CA procedural day is associated with a low risk of periprocedural complications. Previous reports have indicated that some specific subgroups of patients undergoing CA have an increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic complications. This subanalysis of the KYU-RABLE study assessed the changes in plasma concentrations of edoxaban and coagulation biomarkers during the periprocedural period of CA in subgroups stratified by the risk of thromboembolism assessed by CHADS2 score (<2 or ≥2) and AF type (paroxysmal AF [PAF] or non-PAF).

METHODS

We evaluated changes in plasma concentrations of edoxaban and coagulation biomarkers (D-dimer and prothrombin fragment F1+2), by subgroup, during the periprocedural period of CA. Measurements were made prior to CA (procedure day).

RESULTS

This subanalysis evaluated data from 343 patients with CHADS2 score <2 and 134 patients with CHADS2 score ≥2, and from 280 patients with PAF and 197 patients with non-PAF. Plasma edoxaban concentration decreased with time on the day of CA, while plasma concentrations of coagulation biomarkers remained unchanged. No significant differences were observed according to CHADS2 score or type of AF.

CONCLUSIONS

The changes in plasma concentrations of edoxaban and coagulation biomarkers in each subgroup were similar to those of the whole analysis, regardless of the thromboembolic risk (CHADS2 <2 or ≥2) or AF type (PAF or non-PAF).

Meta-analysis of the safety and efficacy of using minimally interrupted novel oral anticoagulants in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

The ideal periprocedural anticoagulation strategy for patients being treated with a novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC) during catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is unclear. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of using a minimally interrupted NOAC strategy versus an uninterrupted NOAC or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) strategy during AF ablation.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were searched for randomized controlled or prospective observational studies that compared a minimally interrupted NOAC strategy with an uninterrupted NOAC or VKA strategy from the time of database establishment up to December 2019. The primary endpoints were major bleeding, minor bleeding, and symptomatic thromboembolism. The secondary endpoint was silent cerebral infarction (SCI) as detected by post-ablation brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A measurement of treatment effect for the endpoint was reported as pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies (6 randomized, 11 observational, and 1 randomized registry) with 6203 patients were included in the final analysis (47% of the patients received minimally interrupted NOAC). There was no significant difference between treatment groups regarding the risk for major bleeding (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.69-1.57, P = 0.86, I² = 27%). Different stratification methods did not yield significant difference regarding the risk for major bleeding. There was no difference between groups regarding the risk for minor bleeding (P = 1.00) or symptomatic thromboembolism (P = 0.26). Brain MRI results showed that both uninterrupted NOAC (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23-0.83, P = 0.01, I² = 72%) and uninterrupted VKA (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.97, P = 0.04, I² = 36%) produced a significant reduction in the rate of SCI when compared with minimally interrupted NOAC.

CONCLUSIONS

A periprocedural anticoagulation strategy of minimally interrupted NOAC is not superior to uninterrupted NOAC or VKA when used during AF ablation. There is evidence favoring the use of uninterrupted NOAC or VKA in terms of the risk for SCI.

Clinical efficacy and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients aged ≥80 years

AIM

To evaluate the clinical safety and efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients aged ≥80 years.

METHODS

A total of 333 AF patients aged ≥60 years were enrolled, who underwent contact force-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation with uninterrupted anticoagulation. All patients were followed-up for at least 12 months. Success was defined by the absence of episodes of AF/atrial tachycardia lasting more than 30 seconds after a 3-month blanking period, without antiarrhythmic drugs.

RESULTS

Compared to patients aged 60-79 years (Group 2, n = 244), patients aged ≥80 years (Group 1, n = 89) were presented with higher rate of diabetes (36.0% vs 22.1%, P = .011), lower body mass index (23.4 ± 3.1 vs 24.9 ± 3.4 kg/m² , P = .001), lower creatinine clearance (56.9 ± 16.5 vs 83.3 ± 24.5 mL/min, P < .001), higher CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score (4.3 ± 1.3 vs 3.3 ± 1.4, P < .001), and HAS-BLED score (2.2 ± 0.8 vs 1.8 ± 0.8, P < .001). Wide antral pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all patients, and there was no significant difference in procedure time, ablation time, fluoroscopy time, and complications rate between two age groups (P > .05). After a mean follow-up of 24.4 ± 9.6 months, the overall success rate was 78.2% in Group 1 and 78.9% in Group 2 (P = .622).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency ablation with contact force sensing catheters for AF is safe and effective in selected patients aged ≥80 years.

Clinical experience of uninterrupted oral anticoagulants during atrial fibrillation ablation in elderly patients: a comparison with non-elderly patients

It is unclear whether uninterrupted oral anticoagulants (OACs) are acceptable in elderly patients as compared to non-elderly patients. This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of an uninterrupted OAC strategy during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in elderly patients. We enrolled 439 consecutive patients who underwent AF ablation with an uninterrupted OAC strategy at our institute. The incidence of bleeding and thromboembolic complications during the AF ablation or within 4 weeks after and the anticoagulation status during the AF ablation were compared between the elderly (age ≧ 75, n = 144) and non-elderly groups (n = 295). There were 22 bleeding complications in the elderly group and 31 in the non-elderly group (15% vs. 11%, p = 0.162) and 3 major bleeding complications in the elderly group and 2 in the non-elderly group (2% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.336). Thromboembolic events were observed in 1 patient in the elderly group and 2 in the non-elderly group (0.7% vs. 0.7%, p = 1.000). The ACT at the end of the procedure was longer in the elderly group than in the non-elderly group (350 s vs. 341 s, p = 0.007) and the proportion of a prolonged ACT of > 400 s (27% vs. 18%, p = 0.046) was more frequent in the elderly group than non-elderly group. A propensity score matched population excluding the age and body weight, revealed that the anticoagulation status during AF ablation was comparable between the two groups. Thus, in the patients undergoing AF ablation with uninterrupted OAC strategy, bleeding complications in elderly patients were similar to those in non-elderly patients. The anticoagulation status during the procedure in elderly patients was more prolonged than that in non-elderly patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Uninterrupted Periprocedural Edoxaban in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation - The Prospective KYU-RABLE Study

BACKGROUND

The KYU-RABLE study, a prospective, multicenter, single-arm interventional study, evaluated the efficacy and safety of uninterrupted oral edoxaban in patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled patients with AF from 23 centers in Japan. Edoxaban 60 mg (30 mg in patients indicated for dose adjustment) was administered uninterrupted, once daily in the morning for ≥4 weeks before CA and 4 weeks ±7 days after CA with one dose delayed on the procedural day. The primary endpoint was a composite of thromboembolism and major bleeding during 4 weeks from the procedural day. Among the 513 eligible patients who underwent CA, 63.5% received edoxaban 60 mg/day and 36.1% received 30 mg/day. For the primary endpoint, no thromboembolism and 1 major bleeding event (0.2%, cardiac tamponade) were observed. The plasma edoxaban concentration decreased depending on the time from the last administration to the CA procedure. However, plasma levels of coagulative biomarkers were within appropriate ranges regardless of the interval from the last administration of edoxaban.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provided evidence of the efficacy and safety of uninterrupted edoxaban administered once daily in the morning, with one dose delayed on procedural day, in patients with AF undergoing CA. Edoxaban was associated with a low risk of periprocedural thromboembolic and bleeding complications.