Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With a Ventricular Assist Device: A Systematic Review of Procedural Characteristics and Outcomes

Early Ventricular Arrhythmias After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

BACKGROUND

Although sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are a common complication after durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic implications of postoperative early VAs (EVAs) in contemporary patients with LVAD are poorly understood.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A single-center retrospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent LVAD implantation from October 1, 2006, to October 1, 2022. EVA was defined as an episode of sustained VA identified ≤30 days after LVAD implantation. A total of 789 patients underwent LVAD implantation (mean age 62.9 ± 0. years 5, HeartMate 3 41.4%, destination therapy 43.3%). EVAs occurred in 100 patients (12.7%). A history of end-stage renal disease (odds ratio [OR] 5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.45-21.70), preoperative electrical storm (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.11-7.16), and appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator therapy before implantation (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.26-6.19) are independently associated with EVAs. EVA was associated with decreased 30-day survival (hazard ratio 3.02, 95% CI 1.1-8.3, P = .032). There was no difference in transplant-free survival time between patients with and without EVAs (hazard ratio 0.82, 95% CI 0.5-1.4, P = .454).

CONCLUSIONS

EVAs are common after durable LVAD implantation and are associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality.

Percutaneous mechanical support in catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: hype or hope?

Catheter ablation (CA) has become an established treatment strategy for managing recurrent ventricular tachycardias (VTs) in patients with structural heart disease. In recent years, percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (PMCS) devices have been increasingly used intra-operatively to improve the ablation outcome. One indication would be rescue therapy for patients who develop haemodynamic deterioration during the ablation. However, more efforts are focused on identifying subjects who are at high risk of such deterioration and could benefit from the pre-emptive use of the PMCS. The third reason to use PMCS could be the inability to identify diffuse substrate, especially in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. This paper reviews available experiences using various types of PMCS in different clinical scenarios. Although PMCS allows mapping during VT, it does not significantly influence acute outcomes and not convincingly long-term outcomes. On the contrary, the complication rate appears to be higher in PMCS cohorts. Our data suggest that even in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction, the substrate modification can be performed without the need for general anaesthesia and risk of haemodynamic decompensation. In end-stage heart failure associated with the electrical storm, implantation of a left ventricular assist device (or PMCS with a transition to the left ventricular assist device) might be the preferred strategy before CA. In high-risk patients who are not potential candidates for these treatment options, radiotherapy could be considered as a bail-out treatment of recurrent VTs. These approaches should be studied in prospective trials.

Simultaneous epicardial ablation based on intraoperative electroanatomic mapping during left ventricular assist device implantation

Intraoperative ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation targeting the epicardial substrate using three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping (EAM) was performed during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We proved that EAM can be safely performed during LVAD implantation and that an ablation strategy based on electrophysiological information may reduce VT recurrence after LVAD implantation.

Ventricular Arrhythmias in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients-Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Considerations

Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used in the treatment of advanced left ventricular heart failure. LVAD can serve as a bridge to orthotopic heart transplantation or as a destination therapy in cases where orthotopic heart transplantation is contraindicated. Ventricular arrhythmias are frequently observed in patients with LVAD. This problem is further compounded as a result of diagnostic difficulties arising from presently available electrocardiographic methods. Due to artifacts from LVAD-generated electromagnetic fields, it can be challenging to assess the origin of arrhythmias in standard ECG tracings. In this article, we will review and discuss common mechanisms, diagnostics methods, and therapeutic strategies for ventricular arrhythmia treatment, as well as numerous problems we face in LVAD implant patients.

Cardiac stereotactic radiation therapy for refractory ventricular arrhythmias in patients with left ventricular assist devices

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is an established treatment for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to medical therapy. However, the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) is high in this population, both in the acute and delayed phases after implantation. About one-third of patients implanted with an LVAD will experience sustained VAs, predisposing these patients to worse outcomes and complicating patient management. The combination of pre-existing myocardial substrate and complex electrical remodeling after LVAD implantation account for the high incidence of VAs observed in this population. LVAD patients presenting VAs refractory to antiarrhythmic therapy and catheter ablation procedures are not rare. In such patients, treatment options are extremely limited. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a technique that delivers precise and high doses of radiation to highly defined targets, reducing exposure to adjacent normal tissue. Cardiac SBRT has recently emerged as a promising alternative with a growing number of case series reporting the effectiveness of the technique in reducing the VA burden in patients with arrhythmias refractory to conventional therapies. The safety profile of cardiac SBRT also appears favorable, even though the current clinical experience remains limited. The use of cardiac SBRT for the treatment of refractory VAs in patients implanted with an LVAD are even more scarce. This review summarizes the clinical experience of cardiac SBRT in LVAD patients and describes technical considerations related to the implementation of the SBRT procedure in the presence of an LVAD.

Evolution of Mechanical Circulatory Support for advanced heart failure

This comprehensive review highlights the significant advancements in Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) therapy, emphasizing its evolution from the early pulsatile flow systems to the cutting-edge continuous-flow devices, particularly the HeartMate 3 (HM3) LVAD. These advancements have notably improved survival rates, reduced complications, and enhanced the quality of life (QoL) for patients with advanced heart failure. The dual role of LVADs, as a bridge-to-transplantation and destination therapy is discussed, highlighting the changing trends and policies in their application. The marked reduction in hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAE) with the HM3 LVAD, compared to previous models signifies ongoing progress in the field. Challenges such as managing major infections are discussed, including innovative solutions like energy transfer systems aimed at eliminating external drivelines. It explores various LVAD-associated complications, including HRAE, infections, hemodynamic-related adverse events, and cardiac arrhythmias, and underscores emerging strategies for predicting post-implantation outcomes, fostering a more individualized patient care approach. Tools such as the HM3 risk score are introduced for predicting survival based on pre-implant factors, along with advanced imaging techniques for improved complication prediction. Additionally, the review highlights potential new technologies and therapies in LVAD management, such as hemodynamic ramp tests for optimal speed adjustment and advanced remote monitoring systems. The goal is to automate LVAD speed adjustments based on real-time hemodynamic measurements, indicating a shift towards more effective, patient-centered therapy. The review concludes optimistically that ongoing research and potential future innovations hold the promise of revolutionizing heart failure management, paving the way for more effective and personalized treatment modalities.

Experience in applied veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to support catheter ablation of malignant ventricular tachycardia

Background

An electrical storm due to malignant ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life-threatening condition that requires catheter ablation (CA). Most VT arrhythmias evolve over time after acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, or chronic heart failure. Clinically, only radiofrequency ablation can identify and block all arrhythmia origin points. The procedure necessitates continuous VT induction in patients, resulting in hemodynamic instability; therefore, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is required. Earlier studies have reported substantial mortality rates; however, our results are significantly more favorable. In this study, we combined the minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) approach with ECMO to preserve an appropriate ECMO flow rate, thus reducing intraoperative left heart afterload. We report 21 cases illustrating the usefulness of modified veno-arterial (VA)-ECMO in this scenario.

Methods

Data of 21 patients supported by the modified VA-ECMO system (MiECC approach combined with the ECMO system) during VT CA in the Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital between June 2020 and July 2021 were reviewed retrospectively.

Results

Successful ablation was achieved in 20 out of 21 patients (95%). The median time for ECMO implantation was 206 min. Only two patients experienced complications post-treatment. All patients made complete recovery and were discharged. All patients were alive at the 1-year-follow-up.

Conclusions

Our modified VA-ECMO system helped restore systemic circulation in patients experiencing an electrical storm, thus achieving greater electrical stability during VT CA. Pre-insertion of VA-ECMO can achieve even better results.

Catheter Ablation for Tachyarrhythmias in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: Clinical Significance and Technical Tips

The demand for durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has been increasing worldwide in tandem with the rising population of advanced heart failure patients. Especially in cases of destination therapy, instead of bridges to transplantation, LVADs require a lifelong commitment. With the increase in follow-up periods after implantation and given the lack of donor hearts, the need for managing concomitant tachyarrhythmias has arisen. Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are documented in approximately 20% to 50% of LVAD recipients during long-term device support, according to previous registries. Atrial arrhythmias, primarily atrial fibrillation, generally exhibit good hemodynamic tolerance; therefore, catheter ablation cannot be easily recommended due to the risk of a residual iatrogenic atrial septal defect that may lead to a right-to-left shunt under durable LVAD supports. The clinical impacts of ventricular arrhythmias, mainly ventricular tachycardia, may vary depending on the time periods following the index implantation. Early occurrence after the operation affects the hospitalization period and mortality; however, the late onset of ventricular tachycardia causes varying prognostic impacts on a case-by-case basis. In cases of hemodynamic instability, catheter ablation utilizing a trans-septal approach is necessary to stabilize hemodynamics. Nonetheless, in some cases originating from the intramural region or the epicardium, procedural failure may occur with the endocardial ablation. Specialized complications associated with the state of LVAD support should be carefully considered when conducting procedures. In LVAD patients, electrophysiologists, circulatory support specialists, and surgeons should collaborate as an integrated team to address the multifaceted issues related to arrhythmia management.

Bail-out Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia Electrical Storm in a Patient with a Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device

The therapeutic strategy for sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) during left ventricular assist device usage remains unclear. We encountered a patient with durable left ventricular assist device who presented sustained VT. Electrophysiological mapping was able to be established appropriately owing to the robust mechanical hemodynamics support despite inter-device interference. The three-dimensional activation map of clinically documented VT demonstrated that the propagation exited from the right ventricular apex through the critical isthmus located at the epicardium or interventricular septum, which was successfully treated by catheter ablation at the exit site. Further experiences like ours should be accumulated to establish a therapeutic strategy.

Open-chest epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia during a left ventricular assist device implantation: a case report

Background

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common after a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Further, the majority of post-LVAD ventricular tachycardias (VTs) are secondary to a preexisting cardiomyopathy substrate. Intraoperative ablation of patients with recurrent preoperative VTs may reduce post-LVAD VTs.

Case summary

A 59-year-old female with advanced heart failure due to non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (LV ejection fraction = 24%) and recurrent VTs was referred for an LVAD implantation as a bridge to a heart transplant (INTERMACS Profile-5A). The previous endocardial ablation failed due to an epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate. Therefore, open-chest epicardial mapping during the LVAD implantation was indicated and three target areas of the arrhythmogenic substrate were found, which were ablated by radiofrequency applications. To minimize the cardiopulmonary bypass time, cardiopulmonary bypass was initiated after ablation, and then, an LVAD was implanted. An additional 68 min was required for mapping and ablation. All procedures were performed without any complications, and the post-operative course was uneventful. Thereafter, no VT episodes were observed without any anti-arrhythmic drugs during a 15-month follow-up with LVAD support.

Discussion

Intraoperative epicardial mapping and ablation during an LVAD implantation can play an important role in the management of LVAD recipients with recurrent VAs.

Cardiac radioablation of incessant ventricular tachycardia in patients with terminal heart failure under permanent left ventricular assist device therapy-description of two cases

PURPOSE

Cardiac radioablation (cRA) using a stereotactic single-session radioablative approach has recently been described as a possible treatment option for patients with otherwise untreatable recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT). There is very limited experience in cRA for patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. We present clinical experiences of two patients treated with cRA for incessant VT under long-term LVAD therapy.

METHODS

Two male patients (54 and 61 years old) with terminal heart failure under LVAD therapy (both patients for 8 years) showed incessant VT despite extensive antiarrhythmic drug therapy and repeated catheter ablation. cRA with a single dose of 25 Gy was applied as a last resort strategy under compassionate use in both patients following an electroanatomical mapping procedure.

RESULTS

Both patients displayed ongoing VT during and after the cRA procedure. Repeated attempts at post-procedural rhythm conversion failed in both patients; however, one patient was hemodynamically stabilized and could be discharged home for several months before falling prey to a fatal bleeding complication. The second patient initially stabilized for a few days following cRA before renewed acceleration of running VT required bilateral ablation of the stellate ganglion; the patient died 50 days later. No immediate side effects of cRA were detected in either patient.

CONCLUSION

cRA might serve as a last resort strategy for patients with terminal heart failure undergoing LVAD therapy and displaying incessant VT. Intermediate- and long-term outcomes of these seriously ill patients often remain poor; therefore, best supportive care strategies should also be evaluated as long as no clear beneficial effects of cRA procedures can be shown. For patients treated with cRA under running ventricular rhythm abnormality, strategies for post-procedural generation of stabilized rhythm have to be established.

Mechanistic assessment and ablation of left ventricular assist device related ventricular tachycardia in patients with severe heart failure

Aims: Left-ventricular-assist-devices (lvad) are an established treatment for patients with severe heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF) and reduce mortality. However, HF patients have significant substrate for ventricular tachycardia (VT) and the lvad itself might be pro-arrhythmogenic. We investigated the mechanism of VT in lvad-patients in relation to the underlying etiology and provide in silico and ex-vivo data for ablation in these HF patients. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed invasive electrophysiological (EP) studies of 17 patients with VT and lvad. The mechanism of VT was determined using electroanatomical, entrainment and activation time mapping. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was present in 70% of patients. VT originated from the lvad region in >30%. 1/6 patients with VT originating from the lvad region had episodes before lvad implantation, while 7/11 patients with VT originating from other regions had episodes before implantation. Number and time of radiofrequency (RF)-ablation lesions were not different between VTs originating from the lvad or other regions. Long-term freedom from VT was 50% upon ablation in patients with VT originating from the lvad region and 64% if ablation was conducted in other regions. To potentially preemptively mitigate lvad related VT in patients undergoing lvad implantation, we obtained in silico derived data and performed ex-vivo experiments targeting ventricular myocardium. Of the tested settings, application of 25 W for 30 s was safe and associated with optimal lesion characteristics. Conclusion: A significant percentage of patients with lvad undergoing VT ablation exhibit arrhythmia originating in close vicinity to the device and recurrence rates are high. Based on in silico and ex-vivo data, we propose individualized RF-ablation in selected patients at risk for/with lvad related VT.

Best Practices for the Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias

Techniques for catheter ablation have evolved to effectively treat a range of ventricular arrhythmias. Pre-operative electrocardiographic and cardiac imaging data are very useful in understanding the arrhythmogenic substrate and can guide mapping and ablation. In this review, we focus on best practices for catheter ablation, with emphasis on tailoring ablation strategies, based on the presence or absence of structural heart disease, underlying clinical status, and hemodynamic stability of the ventricular arrhythmia. We discuss steps to make ablation safe and prevent complications, and techniques to improve the efficacy of ablation, including optimal use of electroanatomical mapping algorithms, energy delivery, intracardiac echocardiography, and selective use of mechanical circulatory support.

Successful recovery from refractory hypoxia due to right-to-left shunting associated with iatrogenic atrial septal defect after catheter ablation in a patient with a left-ventricular assist device: a case report

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) has been reported to be an effective therapeutic option for ventricular arrhythmias, even in patients with a left-ventricular assist device (LVAD). However, the issues of right-to-left shunting due to iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) associated with procedures for CA have not been well documented. We describe a rare case of refractory hypoxia associated with right-to-left shunting via iASD after CA through the transseptal approach in an LVAD patient.

Case summary

A 52-year-old Asian man with a continuous-flow implantable LVAD and progressive right ventricular (RV) dysfunction was admitted because of refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) and subsequent right heart failure. Since VT could not be controlled by intravenous administration of multiple antiarrhythmic drugs, VT ablation via the transseptal approach was performed. Ventricular tachycardia was terminated to the sinus rhythm after VT ablation; however, hypoxia associated with significant right-to-left shunting across the iASD was detected. Intensive medical management, such as an adjusted mechanical ventilator to increase pulmonary vascular compliance and adjustment of LVAD pump speed, as well as the use of intravenous inotropes to support impaired RV function successfully stabilized the haemodynamic and improved hypoxia for the disappearance of right-to-left shunting. Echocardiography at 7 months after CA showed that the significant iASD and right-to-left shunting had disappeared.

Discussion

The evaluation of RV function prior to VT ablation via the transseptal approach is important in the postoperative management of patients with LVAD, because RV dysfunction may cause refractory hypoxia due to iASD.

Physiology of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Therapy

The expanding use of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) for end-stage heart failure warrants familiarity with the physiologic interaction of the device with the native circulation. Contemporary devices utilize predominantly centrifugal flow and, to a lesser extent, axial flow rotors that vary with respect to their intrinsic flow characteristics. Flow can be manipulated with adjustments to preload and afterload as in the native heart, and ascertainment of the predicted effects is provided by differential pressure-flow (H-Q) curves or loops. Valvular heart disease, especially aortic regurgitation, may significantly affect adequacy of mechanical support. In contrast, atrioventricular and ventriculoventricular timing is of less certain significance. Although beneficial effects of device therapy are typically seen due to enhanced distal perfusion, unloading of the left ventricle and atrium, and amelioration of secondary pulmonary hypertension, negative effects of CF-LVAD therapy on right ventricular filling and function, through right-sided loading and septal interaction, can make optimization challenging. Additionally, a lack of pulsatile energy provided by CF-LVAD therapy has physiologic consequences for end-organ function and may be responsible for a series of adverse effects. Rheological effects of intravascular pumps, especially shear stress exposure, result in platelet activation and hemolysis, which may result in both thrombotic and hemorrhagic consequences. Development of novel solutions for untoward device-circulatory interactions will facilitate hemodynamic support while mitigating adverse events. © 2021 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12:1-37, 2021.

HeartMate 3: new challenges in ventricular tachycardia ablation

AIM

To describe clinical characteristics, procedural details, specific challenges, and outcomes in patients with HeartMate3™ (HM3), a left ventricular assist device system with a magnetically levitated pump, undergoing ventricular tachycardia ablation (VTA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data were collected from patients with an HM3 system who underwent VTA in seven tertiary centres. Data included baseline patient characteristics, procedural data, mortality, and arrhythmia-free survival. The study cohort included 19 patients with cardiomyopathy presenting with ventricular tachycardia (VT) (53% with VT storm). Ventricular tachycardias were induced in 89% of patients and a total of 41 VTs were observed. Severe electromagnetic interference was present on the surface electrocardiogram. Hence, VT localization required analysis of intra-cardiac signals or the use of filter in the 40-20 Hz range. The large house pump HM3 design obscured the cannula inflow and therefore multi imaging modalities were necessary to avoid catheter entrapment in the cannula. A total of 32 VTs were mapped and were successfully ablated (31% to the anterior wall, 38% to the septum and only 9% to the inflow cannula region). Non-inducibility of any VT was reached in 11 patients (58%). Over a follow-up of 429 (interquartile range 101-692) days, 5 (26%) patients underwent a redo VT ablation due to recurrent VTA and 2 (11%) patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

Ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with HM3 is feasible and safe when done in the appropriate setup. Long-term arrhythmia-free survival is acceptable but not well predicted by non-inducibility at the end of the procedure.

Lessons learned from catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device

INTRODUCTION

Data on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are scarce in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and current evidence predominantly consists of case reports with outdated LVAD. This prospective observational study reports our experience in terms of catheter ablation of VAs in patients with novel 3^rd generation LVADs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 2018 and 2020, nine consecutive patients undergoing a total number of ten ablation procedures for VAs were analyzed. The mean duration between LVAD implantation and catheter ablation was 23 ± 16 months. Acute procedural success was achieved in all patients. VA substrates were not related to the LVAD scarring (cannula) site in the majority of patients. All procedures were conducted without any relevant procedure-related complications. In terms of follow-up, only one patient presented with a repeat episode of electrical storm requiring ICD-shocks 16 months after the initial ablation procedure. Four patients suffered of singular VA effectively treated with antitachycardia pacing via their ICD. The remainder were free of any VA relapse (n = 4). Two non-procedure-related deaths occurred during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ablation of VAs in patients with 3rd generation LVAD is feasible and leads to satisfying clinical results in terms of freedom from VA recurrence and quality of life. The majority of arrhythmia substrates in these patients are not directly related to the LVAD cannulation site and may represent a progress of heart failure.

First-in-human high-density epicardial mapping and ablation through a left anterior minithoracotomy in an LVAD patient presenting in electrical storm: a case report

Background

Despite substantial technical improvements in long-term mechanical circulatory support, ventricular tachycardia (VT) remains a major challenge in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients. Recurrent VTs in LVAD patients are not only associated with limited quality of life, but also increased mortality. Although LVAD therapy improves VT tolerance of the left ventricle, haemodynamical deterioration of the right ventricle is the limiting factor in these patients.

Case summary 

We present a case report of a hybrid epicardial VT ablation of incessant VTs in a 53-year-old man with advanced heart failure and St.p. LVAD implantation. With this unique clinical case report, we describe an epicardial VT ablation using secondary surgical open-heart access in a patient with therapy-refractory VTs combing left-sided minithoracotomy with high-density (HD) mapping and catheter ablation.

Discussion 

To the best of our knowledge, the presented approach is the first interdisciplinary case of epicardial VT ablation using secondary surgical open-heart access in an LVAD patient with therapy-refractory VTs. By combing left-sided minithoracotomy with HD mapping and catheter ablation, we could to demonstrate that even in these complex patients epicardial VT ablations can be performed safely and improve quality of life of LVAD patients with recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock therapies.

Ablation therapy for ventricular arrhythmias in patients with LVAD: Multiple faces of an electrophysiological challenge

Left ventricular assist device implantation is a recognized treatment option for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to medical therapy and can be used both as bridge to transplantation and as destination therapy. The risk of ventricular arrhythmias is common after left ventricular assist device implantation and is influenced by pre-, peri and post-operative determinants. The management of ventricular arrhythmias can be a challenge when they become refractory to medication or to device therapy and their impact on prognosis can be detrimental despite the mechanical support. In this setting, catheter ablation is being increasingly recognized as a feasible option for patients in which standard therapeutic strategies fail, but also with preventive purpose. Catheter ablation is being increasingly considered for the management of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with left ventricular assist device despite complex clinical and technical peculiarities due to the characteristics of the mechanical support. Much conflicting data exist regarding the predictors of success of the procedure and the rate of recurrence. In this review we discuss the latest evidences regarding catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in this subset of patients, focusing on clinical characteristics, arrhythmia etiology, technical aspects and postprocedural features which must be considered by the electrophysiologist.

Successful Open Chest Epicardial Ablation for Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia in an LVAD Recipient

A patient with history of dilated cardiomyopathy, a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator, and endocardial ablation presented for refractory ventricular tachycardia 3 years after implantation of a Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device (Jarvik Heart, Inc., New York, New York). Open-chest epicardial ablation safely and effectively terminated the arrhythmia, without ventricular tachycardia recurrence at 9-month follow-up and in the absence of complications during the hospital stay. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Management of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with LVAD

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have extended the life expectancy of patients with heart failure. The hemodynamic support afforded by LVADs in this population has also resulted in patients having prolonged ventricular arrhythmias. The purpose of this article is to review the mechanisms of ventricular arrhythmias in LVADs and the available management strategies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence suggests that prolonged ventricular arrhythmias may result in increased mortality in patients with LVADs.

SUMMARY

Successful management of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with LVAD requires interdisciplinary collaboration between electrophysiology and heart failure specialists. Medical management, including changes to LVAD changes, heart failure medication management, and antiarrhythmics constitute the initial treatment for ventricular arrhythmias. Surgical or endocardial ablation are reasonable options if VAs are refractory.

Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is a well-known treatment option for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to medical therapy and is recognized both as bridge to transplant and a destination therapy. The risk of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) is common after LVAD implantation. We review the pathophysiology and recent advances in the management of VA in LVAD patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

VAs are most likely to occur in the early post-operative periods after LVAD implantation and a prior history of VA is the most important risk factor. Post-LVAD VAs are usually well tolerated with less morbidity and decreased risk of sudden cardiac death. However, risk of right heart failure in the setting of persistent VAs is being increasingly recognized. The mechanisms of post-LVAD VAs may vary depending on the time from LVAD implantation. Electrical remodeling may play an important role in the immediate post-implant phase. Preexisting myocardial scar and to a lesser extent mechanical irritation from the LVAD cannula are important in the later phases. Most LVAD patients have a previously placed implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). The benefit of implanting a new ICD in LVAD patients is unknown and should be individualized. For ICD programming, a conservative strategy with higher detection zones and prolonged time to detection is usually recommended aiming to minimize ICD shocks. More aggressive programming is appropriate if the VA results in hemodynamic instability. Antiarrhythmic drugs including amiodarone, mexiletine, and beta blockers are usually the first-line therapy for VAs. Catheter ablation has been shown to be safe and effective in LVAD recipients with recurrent VAs not responsive to antiarrhythmic drugs. LVAD-related VA is most frequently reentrant secondary to myocardial scar and usually well tolerated. Management options include antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

In this complex case study, we discuss a patient who underwent successful catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia following left ventricular assist device placement. We discuss the technique and review existing literature in an effort to explore the feasibility and safety of this procedure in this clinical setting.

Hybrid Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation after Failed Percutaneous Endocardial and Epicardial Ablation

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) after percutaneous ablation is associated with a high morbidity and mortality. We assessed the feasibility of open chest extracorporeal circulation (ECC)-supported 3D multielectrode mapping and targeted VT substrate ablation in patients with previously failed percutaneous endocardial and epicardial VT ablations.

METHODS

In patients with previously failed percutaneous endocardial and epicardial VT ablations and a high risk of hemodynamic collapse during the procedure, open chest ECC-supported mapping and ablation were performed in a hybrid EP lab setting. Electro-anatomic maps (3D) were acquired during sinus rhythm and VT using a multielectrode mapping catheter (HD grid; Abbott or Pentaray, Biosense Webster). Irrigated radiofrequency ablations of all inducible VT were performed with a contact force ablation catheter.

RESULTS

Hybrid VT ablation was performed in 5 patients with structural heart disease (i.e., 3 with previous old myocardial infarction and 2 with nonischemic cardiomy-opathy) and recurrent VT. Acute procedural success was achieved in all patients. Four patients were successfully weaned off the ECC. In 1 patient with a severely reduced LVEF (16%), damage to the venous graft occurred after sternotomy and that patient died after 1 month. Four patients (80%) remained VT free after a median follow-up of 6 (IQR 4-10) months.

CONCLUSION

In high-risk patients with previously failed percutaneous endocardial and epicardial VT ablations, open chest ECC-supported multielectrode epicardial mapping revealed a VT substrate in all of the patients, and targeted epicardial ablation abolished VT substrate in these patients.

Mapping and Ablation of Unmappable Ventricular Tachycardia, Ventricular Tachycardia Storm, and Those in Acute Myocardial Infarction

In stable ventricular tachycardia (VT), activation mapping and entrainment mapping are the most important strategies to describe the reentrant circuit and its critical components. In many patients, however, VT is noninducible or hemodynamically unstable and unmappable. Several technological advances have broadened ablation options in unmappable VTs. Preprocedural imaging and intraprocedural imaging play an important role in location and extent of the substrate. Electroanatomic mapping with several technological improvements allows more precise electrical assessment of the substrate. A combination of imaging and electroanatomic mapping allows substantial modification of arrhythmogenic substrate in sinus rhythm or during device pacing without hemodynamic compromise.

Mapping and Ablation of Ventricle Arrhythmia in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) constitute well-known problems in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), with incidence ranging from 18% to as high as 52%. Catheter ablation has become a common therapeutic intervention to treat drug-refractory VA, particularly with the increase and more widespread use of durable LVADs to bridge patients to transplantation or as destination therapy. In this article, we focus on etiology, mechanisms, periprocedural management, and mapping and ablation techniques in patients with LVADs and VA.