Intravenous Sotalol in the Young: Safe and Effective Treatment With Standardized Protocols

Expedited loading with intravenous sotalol is safe and feasible-primary results of the Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol (PEAKS) Registry

BACKGROUND

Loading of oral sotalol for atrial fibrillation requires 3 days, frequently in the hospital, to achieve steady state. The Food and Drug Administration approved loading with intravenous (IV) sotalol through model-informed development, without patient data.

OBJECTIVE

We present results of the first multicenter evaluation of this recent labeling for IV sotalol.

METHODS

The Prospective Evaluation Analysis and Kinetics of IV Sotalol (PEAKS) Registry was a multicenter observational registry of patients undergoing elective IV sotalol load for atrial arrhythmias. Outcomes, measured from hospital admission until first outpatient follow-up, included adverse arrhythmia events, efficacy, and length of stay.

RESULTS

Of 167 consecutively enrolled patients, 23% were female; the median age was 68 (interquartile range, 61-74) years, and the median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 (interquartile range, 2-4). Overall, 99% were admitted for sotalol initiation (1% for dose escalation), with a target oral sotalol dose of either 80 mg twice daily (85 [51%]) or 120 mg twice daily (78 [47%]); 62 patients (37%) had an estimated creatinine clearance ≤90 mL/min. On presentation, 40% of patients were in sinus rhythm, whereas 26% underwent cardioversion before sotalol infusion. In 2 patients, sotalol infusion was stopped for bradycardia or hypotension. In 6 patients, sotalol was discontinued before discharge because of QTc prolongation (3), bradycardia (1), or recurrent atrial arrhythmia (2). The mean length of stay was 1.1 days, and 95% (n = 159) were discharged within 1 night.

CONCLUSION

IV sotalol loading is safe and feasible for atrial arrhythmias, with low rates of adverse events, and yields shorter hospitalizations. More data are needed on the minimal duration required for monitoring in the hospital.

Pharmacological Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias in the Fetal and Neonatal Periods: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association: Endorsed by the Pediatric & Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES)

Disorders of the cardiac rhythm may occur in both the fetus and neonate. Because of the immature myocardium, the hemodynamic consequences of either bradyarrhythmias or tachyarrhythmias may be far more significant than in mature physiological states. Treatment options are limited in the fetus and neonate because of limited vascular access, patient size, and the significant risk/benefit ratio of any intervention. In addition, exposure of the fetus or neonate to either persistent arrhythmias or antiarrhythmic medications may have yet-to-be-determined long-term developmental consequences. This scientific statement discusses the mechanism of arrhythmias, pharmacological treatment options, and distinct aspects of pharmacokinetics for the fetus and neonate. From the available current data, subjects of apparent consistency/consensus are presented, as well as future directions for research in terms of aspects of care for which evidence has not been established.

Pediatric antiarrhythmics and toxicity: A clinical review

Antiarrhythmic medications are fundamental in the acute and chronic management of pediatric arrhythmias. Particularly in the pediatric patient population, associated antiarrhythmic toxicities represent important potential adverse effects. Emergency medicine clinicians must be skilled in the detection, workup, and management of antiarrhythmic toxicity. This is a clinical review of the indications, pharmacology, adverse effects, and toxicologic treatment of antiarrhythmics commonly used in the pediatric patient population.

Antiarrhythmic Drug Dosing in Children-Review of the Literature

Antiarrhythmic drugs represent a mainstay of pediatric arrhythmia treatment. However, official guidelines and consensus documents on this topic remain scarce. There are rather uniform recommendations for some medications (including adenosine, amiodarone, and esmolol), while there are only very broad dosage recommendations for others (such as sotalol or digoxin). To prevent potential uncertainties and even mistakes with regard to dosing, we summarized the published dosage recommendations for antiarrhythmic drugs in children. Because of the wide variations in availability, regulatory approval, and experience, we encourage centers to develop their own specific protocols for pediatric antiarrhythmic drug therapy.

Protocol Development and Initial Experience With Intravenous Sotalol Loading for Atrial Arrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Oral sotalol is a class III antiarrhythmic commonly used for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the use of IV sotalol loading, based primarily on modeling data for the infusion. We aimed to describe a protocol and experience with IV sotalol loading for elective treatment of adult patients with AF and atrial flutter (AFL).

METHODS

We present our institutional protocol and retrospective review of initial patients treated with IV sotalol for AF/AFL at the University of Utah Hospital between September 2020 and April 2021.

RESULTS

Eleven patients received IV sotalol for initial loading or dose escalation. All patients were male, aged 56-88 years (median 69). Mean QT interval (QTc) intervals increased from baseline (mean 384 ms) immediately after infusion of IV sotalol (mean change 42ms), but no patient required discontinuation of the medication. Six patients were discharged after 1 night; 4 patients were discharged after 2 nights; and 1 patient was discharged after 4 nights. Nine patients underwent electrical cardioversion prior to discharge (2 prior to load; 7 post-load on the day of discharge). There were no adverse events during the infusion or within 6 months of discharge. Persistence of therapy was 73% (8 of 11) at mean 9.9 weeks to follow up, with no discontinuations for adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

We employed a streamlined protocol that was successfully implemented to facilitate the use of IV sotalol loading for atrial arrhythmias. Our initial experience suggests feasibility, safety, and tolerability while reducing hospitalization duration. Additional data are needed to augment this experience as IV sotalol use is broadened across different patient populations.

IV Sotalol Use in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Patients: A Multicenter Registry Study

Background

There is limited information regarding the clinical use and effectiveness of IV sotalol in pediatric patients and patients with congenital heart disease, including those with severe myocardial dysfunction. A multicenter registry study was designed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and dosing of IV sotalol.

Methods and Results

A total of 85 patients (age 1 day–36 years) received IV sotalol, of whom 45 (53%) had additional congenital cardiac diagnoses and 4 (5%) were greater than 18 years of age. In 79 patients (93%), IV sotalol was used to treat supraventricular tachycardia and 4 (5%) received it to treat ventricular arrhythmias. Severely decreased cardiac function by echocardiography was seen before IV sotalol in 7 (9%). The average dose was 1 mg/kg (range 0.5–1.8 mg/kg/dose) over a median of 60 minutes (range 30–300 minutes). Successful arrhythmia termination occurred in 31 patients (49%, 95% CI [37%–62%]) with improvement in rhythm control defined as rate reduction permitting overdrive pacing in an additional 18 patients (30%, 95% CI [19%–41%]). Eleven patients (16%) had significant QTc prolongation to >465 milliseconds after the infusion, with 3 (4%) to >500 milliseconds. There were 2 patients (2%) for whom the infusion was terminated early.

Conclusions

IV sotalol was safe and effective for termination or improvement of tachyarrhythmias in 79% of pediatric patients and patients with congenital heart disease, including those with severely depressed cardiac function. The most common dose, for both acute and maintenance dosing, was 1 mg/kg over ~60 minutes with rare serious complications.

Sotalol versus amiodarone for postoperative junctional tachycardia after congenital heart surgery

BACKGROUND

Junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET) is a common arrhythmia after congenital heart disease surgery. There is variability in the choice of antiarrhythmic therapy, with amiodarone used commonly. Intravenous (IV) sotalol is a newly available agent that may be useful for JET.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IV sotalol for postoperative JET and compare outcomes with IV amiodarone.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-center study of all patients who received IV sotalol or IV amiodarone for postoperative JET at Texas Children's Hospital from December 15, 2015, to December 15, 2020. Data included antiarrhythmic efficacy, hemodynamics, and adverse effects. Successful JET control was defined as a decrease in JET rate to <170 beats/min (or decrease by >20%), or conversion to sinus rhythm, with persistent control over 24 hours without requiring alternative antiarrhythmics or mechanical support.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients (median age 71 days; interquartile range 17-221 days) received IV amiodarone (n = 20 [62%]) or IV sotalol (n = 12 [38%]) for postoperative JET. Amiodarone was successful in treating JET in 75% of cases; sotalol was successful in 83%. The JET rate decreased faster over the first 90 minutes after a sotalol bolus (25 beats/min per hour) than after an amiodarone bolus (8 beats/min per hour) (P < .01); no heart rate difference was seen after 24 hours. Amiodarone infusion was discontinued early because of hypotension/bradycardia in 2 patients; this was not required in any patients receiving sotalol.

CONCLUSION

For children with postoperative JET, both IV sotalol and amiodarone are safe and efficacious. IV sotalol may lead to a faster improvement in heart rate.