Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Guided by Echocardiography, MRI, and CT Imaging: A Randomized Controlled Study

Role of speckle tracking echocardiography beyond current guidelines in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a device-based treatment applied to patients with a specific profile of heart failure. According to current guidelines, indication for CRT is given on the basis of QRS morphology and duration, and traditional transthoracic echocardiography is mainly used to estimate left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. However, the identification of patients who may benefit from CRT remains challenging, since the application of the above-mentioned guidelines is still associated with a high rate of non-responders. The assessment of various aspects of LV mechanics (including contractile synchrony, coordination and propagation, and myocardial work) performed by conventional and novel ultrasound technologies, first of all speckle tracking echocardiography (STE), may provide additional, useful information for CRT patients' selection, in particular among non-LBBB patients, who generally respond less to CRT. A multiparametric approach, based on the combination of ECG criteria and echocardiographic indices of LV dyssynchrony/discoordination would be desirable to improve the prediction of CRT response.

[History of cardiac resynchronization therapy : 30 years of electrotherapeutic management for heart failure]

The first permanent biventricular pacing system was implanted more than 30 years ago. In this article, the historical development of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), starting with the pathophysiological concept, followed by the initial "proof of concept" studies and finally the large prospective-randomized studies that led to the implementation of CRT in heart failure guidelines, is outlined. Since the establishment of CRT, both an expansion of indications, e.g., for patients with mild heart failure and atrial fibrillation, but also the return to patients with broad QRS complex and left bundle branch block who benefit most of CRT has evolved. New techniques such as conduction system pacing will have major influence on pacemaker therapy in heart failure, both as an alternative or adjunct to CRT.

Left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Current data and potential explanations for the lack of benefit

The present article reviews the literature on image-guided cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) studies. Improved outcome to CRT has been associated with the placement of a left ventricular (LV) lead in the latest activated segment free from scar. The majority of randomized controlled trials investigating guided LV lead implantation did not show superiority over conventional implantation approaches. Several factors may contribute to this paradoxical observation, including inclusion criteria favoring patients with left bundle branch block who already respond well to conventional anatomical LV lead implantation, differences in activation wavefronts during simultaneous right ventricular and LV pacing, incorrect definition of target regions, and limitations in coronary venous anatomy that prevent access to target regions that are detected by imaging. It is imperative that exclusion of patients lacking access to target regions from these studies would lead to larger benefit of image-guided CRT.

Location, Location, Location: A Pilot Study to Compare Electrical with Echocardiographic-Guided Targeting of Left Ventricular Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

Introduction: Cardiac resynchronisation therapy is ineffective in 30-40% of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Targeting non-scarred myocardium by selecting the site of latest mechanical activation using echocardiography has been suggested to improve outcomes but at the cost of increased resource utilisation. The interval between the beginning of the QRS complex and the local LV lead electrogram (QLV) might represent an alternative electrical marker. Aims: To determine whether the site of latest myocardial electrical and mechanical activation are concordant. Methods: This was a single-centre, prospective pilot study, enrolling patients between March 2019 and June 2021. Patients underwent speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) prior to CRT implantation. Intra-procedural QLV measurement and R-wave amplitude were performed in a blinded fashion at all accessible coronary sinus branches. Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cohen's Kappa coefficient were utilised for the comparison of electrical and echocardiographic parameters. Results: A total of 20 subjects had complete data sets. In 15, there was a concordance at the optimal site between the electrically targeted region and the mechanically targeted region; in four, the regions were adjacent (within one segment). There was discordance (≥2 segments away) in only one case between the two methods of targeting. There was a statistically significant increase in procedure time and fluoroscopy duration using the intraprocedural QLV strategy. There was no statistical correlation between the quantitative electrical and echocardiographic data. Conclusions: A QLV-guided approach to targeting LV lead placement appears to be a potential alternative to the established echocardiographic-guided technique. However, it is associated with prolonged fluoroscopy and overall procedure time.

Multimodality Imaging for Selecting Candidates for CRT: Do We Have a Single Alley to Increase Responders?

Cardiac resynchronization therapy has evolved in recent years to provide a reduction of morbidity and mortality for many patients with heart failure. Its application and optimization is an evolving field and its use requires a multidisciplinary approach for patient and device selection, technical preprocedural planning, and optimization. While echocardiography has always been considered the first line for the evaluation of patients, additional imaging techniques have gained increasing evidence in recent years. Today different details about heart anatomy, function, dissynchrony can be investigated by magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, nuclear imaging, and more, with the aim of obtaining clues to reach a maximal response from the electrical therapy. The purpose of this review is to provide a practical analysis of the single and combined use of different imaging techniques in the preoperative and perioperative phases of cardiac resynchronization therapy, underlining their main advantages, limitations, and information provided.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

Hemodynamic forces from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging predict left ventricular remodeling following cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB) may receive cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but current selection criteria are imprecise, and many patients have limited treatment response. Hemodynamic forces (HDF) have been suggested as a marker for CRT response. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate left ventricular (LV) HDF as a predictive marker for LV remodeling after CRT.

METHODS

Patients with heart failure, EF < 35% and LBBB (n = 22) underwent CMR with 4D flow prior to CRT. LV HDF were computed in three directions using the Navier-Stokes equations, reported in median N [interquartile range], and the ratio of transverse/longitudinal HDF was calculated for systole and diastole. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed before and 6 months after CRT. Patients with end-systolic volume reduction ≥ 15% were defined as responders.

RESULTS

Non-responders had smaller HDF than responders in the inferior-anterior direction in systole (0.06 [0.03] vs. 0.07 [0.03], p = 0.04), and in the apex-base direction in diastole (0.09 [0.02] vs. 0.1 [0.05], p = 0.047). Non-responders had larger diastolic HDF ratio compared to responders (0.89 vs. 0.67, p = 0.004). ROC analysis of diastolic HDF ratio for identifying CRT non-responders had AUC of 0.88 (p = 0.005) with sensitivity 57% and specificity 100% for ratio > 0.87. Intragroup comparison found higher HDF ratio in systole compared to diastole for responders (p = 0.003), but not for non-responders (p = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

Hemodynamic force ratio is a potential marker for identifying patients with heart failure and LBBB who are unlikely to benefit from CRT. Larger-scale studies are required before implementation of HDF analysis into clinical practice.

Targeted left ventricular lead positioning to the site of latest activation in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Several studies have evaluated the use of electrically- or imaging-guided left ventricular (LV) lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) recipients. We aimed to assess evidence for a guided strategy that targets LV lead position to the site of latest LV activation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until March 2023 that evaluated electrically- or imaging-guided LV lead positioning on clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization, and secondary endpoints were quality of life, 6-min walk test (6MWT), QRS duration, LV end-systolic volume, and LV ejection fraction. We included eight RCTs that comprised 1323 patients. Six RCTs compared guided strategy (n = 638) to routine (n = 468), and two RCTs compared different guiding strategies head-to-head: electrically- (n = 111) vs. imaging-guided (n = 106). Compared to routine, a guided strategy did not significantly reduce the risk of the primary endpoint after 12-24 (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.52-1.33) months. A guided strategy was associated with slight improvement in 6MWT distance after 6 months of follow-up of absolute 18 (95% CI 6-30) m between groups, but not in remaining secondary endpoints. None of the secondary endpoints differed between the guided strategies.

CONCLUSION

In this study, a CRT implantation strategy that targets the latest LV activation did not improve survival or reduce heart failure hospitalizations.

Association between left ventricular lead position and intrinsic QRS morphology with regard to clinical outcome in cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) lead position may be an important factor for delivering effective cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We therefore aimed to evaluate the effects of LV lead position, stratified by native QRS morphology, regarding the clinical outcome.

METHODS

A total of 1295 CRT-implanted patients were retrospectively evaluated. LV lead position was classified as lateral, anterior, inferior, or apical, and was determined using the left and right anterior oblique X-ray views. Kaplan Meier and Cox regression were performed to evaluate the effects on all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization, and the potential interaction between LV lead position and native ECG morphologies.

RESULTS

A total of 1295 patients were included. Patients were aged 69 ± 7 years, 20% were female, 46% received a CRT-Pacemaker (vs. CRT-Defibrillator), mean LVEF was 25% ± 7%, and median follow-up was 3.3 years [IQR 1.6-5-7 years]. Eight hundred and eighty-two patients (68%) had a lateral LV lead location, 207 (16%) anterior, 155 (12%) apical, and 51 (4%) inferior. Patients with lateral LV lead position had larger QRS reduction (-13 ± 27 ms vs. -3 ± 24 ms, p < .001). Non-lateral lead location was associated with a higher risk for all-cause mortality (HR 1.34 [1.09-1.67], p = .007) and heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.25 [1.03-1.52], p = .03). This association was strongest for patients with native left or right bundle branch block, and not significant for patients with prior paced QRS or nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients treated with CRT, non-lateral LV lead positions (including apical, anterior, and inferior positions) were associated with worse clinical outcome and less reduction of QRS duration. This association was strongest for patients with native LBBB or RBBB.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Left Atrial Remodeling: A Novel Insight?

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) restores ventricular dyssynchrony, improving left ventricle (LV) systolic function, symptoms, and outcome in patients with heart failure, systolic dysfunction, and prolonged QRS interval. The left atrium (LA) plays tremendous roles in maintaining cardiac function, being often inflicted in various cardiovascular diseases. LA remodeling implies structural-dilation, functional-altered phasic functions, and strain and electrical-atrial fibrillation remodeling. Until now, several important studies have approached the relationship between LA and CRT. LA volumes can predict responsiveness to CRT, being also associated with improved outcome in these patients. LA function and strain parameters have been shown to improve after CRT, especially in those who were positive responders to it. Further studies still need to be conducted to comprehensively characterize the impact of CRT on LA phasic function and strain, and, also, in conjunction with its impact on functional mitral regurgitation and LV diastolic dysfunction. The aim of this review was to provide an overview of current available data regarding the relation between CRT and LA remodeling.

The saga of dyssynchrony imaging: Are we getting to the point

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) has an established role in the management of patients with heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF &lt; 35%) and widened QRS (&gt;130 msec). Despite the complex pathophysiology of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony and the increasing evidence supporting the identification of specific electromechanical substrates that are associated with a higher probability of CRT response, the assessment of LVEF is the only imaging-derived parameter used for the selection of CRT candidates.

This review aims to (1) provide an overview of the evolution of cardiac imaging for the assessment of LV dyssynchrony and its role in the selection of patients undergoing CRT; (2) highlight the main pitfalls and advantages of the application of cardiac imaging for the assessment of LV dyssynchrony; (3) provide some perspectives for clinical application and future research in this field.

Conclusion

the road for a more individualized approach to resynchronization therapy delivery is open and imaging might provide important input beyond the assessment of LVEF.

Multi-modality imaging to guide the implantation of cardiac electronic devices in heart failure: is the sum greater than the individual components?

Heart failure is a clinical syndrome with an increasing prevalence and incidence worldwide that impacts patients' quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy are pillars of managing patients with HF and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Despite the advances in cardiac imaging, the assessment of patients needing cardiac implantable electronic devices relies essentially on the measure of left ventricular ejection fraction. However, multi-modality imaging can provide important information concerning the aetiology of heart failure, the extent and localization of myocardial scar, and the pathophysiological mechanisms of left ventricular conduction delay. This paper aims to highlight the main novelties and progress in the field of multi-modality imaging to identify patients who will benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy and/or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. We also want to underscore the boundaries that prevent the application of imaging-derived parameters to patients who will benefit from cardiac implantable electronic devices and orient the choice of the device. Finally, we aim at providing some reflections for future research in this field.

Pulmonary perfusion and NYHA classification improve after cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Evaluation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) often includes New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, and echocardiography. However, these measures have limitations. Perfusion gradients from ventilation/perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (V/P SPECT) are related to left-heart filling pressures and have been validated against invasive right-heart catheterization. The aim was to assess if changes in perfusion gradients are associated with improvements in heart failure (HF) symptoms after CRT, and if they correlate with currently used diagnostic methods in the follow-up of patients with HF after receiving CRT.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Nineteen patients underwent V/P SPECT, echocardiography, NYHA classification, and the quality-of-life scoring system "Minnesota living with HF" (MLWHF), before and after CRT. CRT caused improvement in perfusion gradients from V/P SPECT which were associated with improvements in NYHA classification (P = .0456), whereas improvements in end-systolic volume (LVESV) from echocardiography were not. After receiving CRT, the proportion of patients who improved was lower using LVESV (n = 7/19, 37%) than perfusion gradients (n = 13/19, 68%). Neither change in perfusion gradients nor LVESV was associated with changes in MLWHF (P = 1.0, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of perfusion gradients from V/P SPECT is a promising quantitative user-independent surrogate measure of left-sided filling pressure in the assessment of CRT response in patients with HF.

The role of cardiac magnetic resonance in identifying appropriate candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy - a systematic review of the literature

Despite the strict indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation, a significant proportion of patients will fail to adequately respond to the treatment. This systematic review aims to present the existing evidence about the role of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in identifying patients who are likely to respond better to the CRT. A systematic search in the MedLine database and Cochrane Library from their inception to August 2021 was performed, without any limitations, by two independent investigators. We considered eligible observational studies or randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that enrolled patients > 18 years old with heart failure (HF) of ischaemic or non-ischaemic aetiology and provided data about the association of baseline CMR variables with clinical or echocardiographic response to CRT for at least 3 months. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA Statement). Following our search strategy, 47 studies were finally included in our review. CMR appears to have an additive role in identifying the subgroup of patients who will respond better to CRT. Specifically, the presence and the extent of myocardial scar were associated with increased non-response rates, while those with no scar respond better. Furthermore, existing data show that scar location can be associated with CRT response rates. CMR-derived markers of mechanical desynchrony can also be used as predictors of CRT response. CMR data can be used to optimize the position of the left ventricular lead during the CRT implantation procedure. Specifically, positioning the left ventricular lead in a branch of the coronary sinus that feeds an area with transmural scar was associated with poorer response to CRT. CMR can be used as a non-invasive optimization tool to identify patients who are more likely to achieve better clinical and echocardiographic response following CRT implantation.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes with left ventricular lead concordant with latest mechanical activation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

For cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), image-guided approaches targeting left ventricular (LV) lead placement at the site of latest mechanical activation had inconsistent outcomes. We examined evidence for improved CRT outcomes when LV lead placement concordant with latest mechanical activation occurred.

METHODS

A review of EMBASE and PubMed was performed for randomized controlled trials or prospective observational studies from October 2008 through October 2020 comparing outcomes with concordant versus discordant LV lead placement. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the association between concordance and death, death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization, ≥ 15% reduction in LV end systolic volume (LVESV), and changes in LVESV or ejection fraction (LVEF).

RESULTS

From 5897 citations, nine publications (eight studies) with 1355 patients were selected; 975 with a concordant LV lead and 380 with a discordant lead. Mean age was 66-68 years, 82% were male, and 64% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Meta-analyses demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in death/HF hospitalization at 2 years (OR 0.38; 95% CI 0.16, 0.92) and LVESV at 6 months (mean difference [MD] -13.4%; 95% CI -6.7%, -20.0%), and an increase in LVEF (MD 4.03; 95% CI 0.77, 7.30) with the concordant LV lead. There were trends toward decreased death at 2 years (OR 0.49; 95% CI 0.19, 1.23) and ≥ 15% reduction in LVESV at 6 months (OR 3.81; 95% CI 0.24, 61.24) with concordant LV lead placement.

CONCLUSION

A concordant LV lead was associated with better CRT outcomes. Further study of feasible methods to achieve LV lead concordance is needed.

The role of guidance in delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Positioning the left ventricular lead at the optimal myocardial segment has been proposed to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response.

Objectives

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluating echocardiographic and clinical response delivered with different guidance modalities compared to conventional fluoroscopic positioning.

Methods

Randomized trials with ≥6 months follow-up comparing any combination of imaging, electrical, hemodynamic, or fluoroscopic guidance were included. Imaging modalities were split whether one modality was used: cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE), single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac computed tomography (CT), or a combination of these, defined as “multimodality imaging.”

Results

Twelve studies were included (n = 1864). Pair-wise meta-analysis resulted in significant odds of reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) >15% (odds ratio [OR] 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–2.13, P = .025) and absolute reduction in LVESV (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.25, 95% CI -0.43 to -0.08, P = .005) with guidance. CMR (OR 55.3, 95% CI 4.7–656.9, P = .002), electrical (OR 17.0, 95% CI 2.9–100, P = .002), multimodality imaging (OR 4.47, 95% CI 1.36–14.7, P = .014), and hemodynamic guidance (OR 1.29–28.0, P = .02) were significant in reducing LVESV >15%. Only STE demonstrated a significant reduction in absolute LVESV (SMD -0.38, 95% CI -0.68 to -0.09, P = .011]. CMR had the highest probability of improving clinical response (OR 17.9, 95% CI 5.14–62.5, P < .001).

Conclusion

Overall, guidance improves CRT outcomes. STE and multimodality imaging provided the most reliable evidence of efficacy. Wide CIs observed for results of CMR guidance suggest more powered studies are required before a clear ranking is possible.

Status and Update on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trials

After decades of clinical use, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can be considered an established therapy. However, there are multiple open questions to be addressed that shall further improve the proportion of patients responding to CRT. Progress in better understanding the relationship between electrical and mechanical disorder in patients with heart failure with ventricular conduction abnormalities is important. This article presents and discusses ongoing studies in different areas of CRT research, including patient selection by novel diagnostic tools, extension of clinical criteria, left ventricular lead positioning and pacing site selection, optimization of CRT delivery and programming, and selection of device type.

Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Image-Guided Left Ventricular Lead Placement at the Site of Latest Mechanical Activation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim

To assess evidence for an image-guided approach for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) that targets left ventricular (LV) lead placement at the segment of latest mechanical activation.

Methods

A systematic review of EMBASE and PubMed was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective observational studies from October 2008 through October 2020 that compared an image-guided CRT approach with a non-image-guided approach for LV lead placement. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the association between the image-guided approach and NYHA class improvement or changes in end-systolic volume (LVESV), end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), and ejection fraction (LVEF).

Results

From 5897 citations, 5 RCTs including 818 patients (426 image-guided and 392 non-image-guided) were identified. The mean age ranged from 66 to 71 years, 76% were male, and 53% had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Speckle tracking echocardiography was the primary image-guided method in all studies. LV lead placement within the segment of the latest mechanical activation (concordant) was achieved in the image-guided arm in 45% of the evaluable patients. There was a statistically significant improvement in the NYHA class at 6 months (odds ratio 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.02, 2.69]) with the image-guided approach, but no statistically significant change in LVESV (MD -7.1%; 95% CI [-16.0, 1.8]), LVEDV (MD -5.2%; 95% CI [-15.8, 5.4]), or LVEF (MD 0.68; 95% CI [-4.36, 5.73]) versus the non-image-guided approach.

Conclusion

The image-guided CRT approach was associated with improvement in the NYHA class but not echocardiographic measures, possibly due to the small sample size and a low rate of concordant LV lead placement despite using the image-guided approach. Therefore, our meta-analysis was not able to identify consistent improvement in CRT outcomes with an image-guided approach.

Targeting the latest site of left ventricular mechanical activation is associated with improved long-term outcomes for recipients of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Background

Previous studies have suggested that targeting the site of latest mechanical activation of the left ventricle (LV) results in improved cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes. It is not known whether these benefits are sustained over medium-term follow-up.

Objective

To assess the clinical outcome of imaging-guided LV lead position.

Methods

We sought to assess the medium-term clinical outcome by performing a patient-level meta-analysis of 2 previously published randomized controlled trials (the “STARTER” trial and the “CRT Clinic” trial). These 2 trials compared imaging-guided LV lead placement in the latest activated scar-free segment (intervention group) to standard of care (control). Mortality and heart failure hospitalization outcomes over extended follow-up were gathered from the medical records and merged. Results were stratified for native electrocardiogram (ECG) morphology.

Results

A total of 289 patients were followed for a median of 6.3 years. Seven years post implant, 47 (28%) in the intervention group had died, vs 47 (38%) in the control group (P = .13); 49 (30%) vs 53 (42%) had been hospitalized for heart failure (P = .035); and 47% vs 59% (P = .057) had reached the combined endpoint. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients in the intervention group had better survival free of heart failure hospitalization (P = .045) and lower risk of heart failure hospitalization (P = .019).

Conclusion

Targeting the latest mechanically activated segment in CRT results in better medium-term clinical outcome, mainly driven by a reduced risk of hospitalization for heart failure. The effect was seen regardless of native ECG morphology.

Regional contributions to left ventricular stroke volume determined by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy

Background

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) restores ventricular synchrony and induces left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure (HF) and dyssynchrony. However, 30% of treated patients are non-responders despite all efforts. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can be used to quantify regional contributions to stroke volume (SV) as potential CRT predictors. The aim of this study was to determine if LV longitudinal (SV_long%), lateral (SV_lat%), and septal (SV_sept%) contributions to SV differ from healthy controls and investigate if these parameters can predict CRT response.

Methods

Sixty-five patients (19 women, 67 ± 9 years) with symptomatic HF (LVEF ≤ 35%) and broadened QRS (≥ 120 ms) underwent CMR. SV_long% was calculated as the volume encompassed by the atrioventricular plane displacement (AVPD) from end diastole (ED) to end systole (ES) divided by total SV. SV_lat%, and SV_sept% were calculated as the volume encompassed by radial contraction from ED to ES. Twenty age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers were used as controls. The regional measures were compared to outcome response defined as ≥ 15% decrease in echocardiographic LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) from pre- to 6-months post CRT (delta, Δ).

Results

AVPD and SV_long% were lower in patients compared to controls (8.3 ± 3.2 mm vs 15.3 ± 1.6 mm, P < 0.001; and 53 ± 18% vs 64 ± 8%, P < 0.01). SV_sept% was lower (0 ± 15% vs 10 ± 4%, P < 0.01) with a higher SV_lat% in the patient group (42 ± 16% vs 29 ± 7%, P < 0.01). There were no differences between responders and non-responders in neither SV_long% (P = 0.87), SV_lat% (P = 0.09), nor SV_sept% (P = 0.65). In patients with septal net motion towards the right ventricle (n = 28) ΔLVESV was − 18 ± 22% and with septal net motion towards the LV (n = 37) ΔLVESV was − 19 ± 23% (P = 0.96).

Conclusions

Longitudinal function, expressed as AVPD and longitudinal contribution to SV, is decreased in patients with HF scheduled for CRT. A larger lateral contribution to SV compensates for the abnormal septal systolic net movement. However, LV reverse remodeling could not be predicted by these regional contributors to SV.

Optimal CRT Implantation-Where and How To Place the Left-Ventricular Lead?

Purpose of Review

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) represents a well-established and effective non-pharmaceutical heart failure (HF) treatment in selected patients. Still, a significant number of patients remain CRT non-responders. An optimal placement of the left ventricular (LV) lead appears crucial for the intended hemodynamic and hence clinical improvement. A well-localized target area and tools that help to achieve successful lead implantation seem to be of utmost importance to reach an optimal CRT effect.

Recent Findings

Recent studies suggest previous multimodal imaging (CT/cMRI/ECG torso) to guide intraprocedural LV lead placement. Relevant benefit compared to empirical lead optimization is still a matter of debate. Technical improvements in leads and algorithms (e.g., multipoint pacing (MPP), adaptive algorithms) promise higher procedural success. Recently emerging alternatives for ventricular synchronization such as conduction system pacing (CSP), LV endocardial pacing, or leadless pacing challenge classical biventricular pacing.

Summary

This article reviews current strategies for a successful planning, implementation, and validation of the optimal CRT implantation. Pre-implant imaging modalities offer promising assistance for complex cases; empirical lead positioning and intraoperative testing remain the cornerstone in most cases and ensure a successful CRT effect.

Imaging-guided cardiac resynchronization therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Among patients with heart failure and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction despite guideline directed medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization (CRT) is an effective technology to reverse LV remodeling. Given that a large portion of patients are non-responders, alternatives to traditional LV-lead placement have been explored. A promising alternative is image targeted placement of an LV-lead to latest mechanically activated segment without scar.

METHODS

Electronic database search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the imaging-guided LV-lead placement on clinical, echocardiographic, and functional outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality and heart failure hospitalization. The secondary outcomes included CRT responders, New York Heart Association (NYHA), 6-minute walk test, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ), and ejection fraction (EF) changes.

RESULTS

Analysis included 4 RCTs of 691 patients with an average follow-up of 2 years (age 69.5 ± 10.3 years, 76% males, 54% ischemic cardiomyopathy, 81% with NYHA classes III/IV, and EF of 24.4% ± 8). The most common site for LV-lead paced segment was the anterolateral segment (45%) and at mid-LV (49%). Compared with the control, imaging-guided LV-lead placement was associated with a significant reduction of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.40-0.88; p = .01), higher CRT responders (odd ratio [OR] = 2.10; p < .01), more NYHA improvements by ≥1 (OR = 1.89; p = .01), increased 6MWT (mean difference [MD] = 25.78 feet; p < .01), and lower MLHFQ (MD = -4.04; p = .04), without significant differences in the LVEF (p = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing CRT, imaging-guided LV-lead placement was associated with improved clinical, echocardiographic, and functional status.

State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies

Cardiac electrophysiology procedures have evolved to provide improvement in morbidity and mortality for many patients. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) placement and lead extraction procedures are proven procedures, associated with significant reductions in patient morbidity and mortality as well as improved quality of life. The applications and optimization of these therapies are an evolving field. The optimal use and outcomes of cardiac electrophysiology procedures require a multidisciplinary approach to patient selection, device selection, and procedural planning. Cardiac imaging using echocardiography plays a key role in selection of patients for CRT therapy, for guidance of left ventricular (LV) lead placement, and for optimization of atrioventricular pacing delays in patients with CRT. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is an important tool in assessment of lead perforation, as well as assessing risk of lead extraction and procedural planning. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important adjunct to transthoracic echocardiography for patient selection and risk stratification for defibrillator therapy for multiple disease states including ischemic cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac sarcoidosis, and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). Cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) is a useful adjunct to the diagnosis of device infections as well as inflammatory conditions including cardiac sarcoidosis. Our review attempts to summarize the contemporary roles of multimodality imaging in CRT therapy, ICD therapy and lead extraction therapy.

Cardiovascular Imaging Applications in Clinical Management of Patients Treated with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiovascular imaging techniques, including echocardiography, nuclear cardiology, multi-slice computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance, have wide applications in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Our aim was to provide an update of cardiovascular imaging applications before, during, and after implantation of a CRT device. Before CRT implantation, cardiovascular imaging techniques may integrate current clinical and electrocardiographic selection criteria in the identification of patients who may most likely benefit from CRT. Assessment of myocardial viability by ultrasound, nuclear cardiology, or cardiac magnetic resonance may guide optimal left ventricular (LV) lead positioning and help to predict LV function improvement by CRT. During implantation, echocardiographic techniques may guide in the identification of the best site of LV pacing. After CRT implantation, cardiovascular imaging plays an important role in the assessment of CRT response, which can be defined according to LV reverse remodeling, function and dyssynchrony indices. Furthermore, imaging techniques may be used for CRT programming optimization during follow-up, especially in patients who turn out to be non-responders. However, in the clinical settings, the use of proposed functional indices for different imaging techniques is still debated, due to their suboptimal feasibility and reproducibility. Moreover, identifying CRT responders before implantation and turning non-responders into responders at follow-up remain challenging issues.