Symptom Under-Recognition of Atrial Fibrillation Patients in Consideration for Catheter Ablation: A Report From the KiCS-AF Registry

Deep neuromuscular blockade during radiofrequency catheter ablation under general anesthesia reduces the prevalence of atrial fibrillation recurrence when compared to moderate neuromuscular blockade: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Proper anesthesia management is required to maintain immobilization and stable breathing of the patient to improve catheter contact and stability during catheter ablation for PVI. However, it remains unclear whether the depth of neuromuscular blockade affects the results of RFCA under general anesthesia.

METHODS

The patients were randomly assigned to either the moderate neuromuscular blockade group (Group M, train-of-four 1 to 2) or the deep neuromuscular blockade group (Group D, posttetanic count 1-2). The primary outcome was the 12-month AF recurrence rate using confirmed electrocardiographic diagnosis after the ablation procedure at two different neuromuscular blockade depths.

RESULTS

Total 94 patients (47 in each group) were included in the analysis. Recurrence of AF during the A 12-month follow-up was 12 (25%) in group D and 22 (46%) in group M. The AF recurrence rate was significantly higher in group M (p =  0.03). The relative risk (RR) for the risk of 12-month AF recurrence was 0.545 in group D. AF symptom recurrence was observed during the A 12-month follow-up in 12 (25%) and 26 (54%) patients in groups D and M, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to moderate neuromuscular blockade, deep neuromuscular blockade while performing RFCA under general anesthesia reduced 12-month AF recurrence rate. Deep neuromuscular blockade under general anesthesia is thought to increase the success rate by providing a stable surgical environment during the RFCA procedure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trials of Korea KCT 0003371.

Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System Implementation in Outpatient Cardiovascular Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

The integration of patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessments in cardiovascular care has encountered considerable obstacles despite their established clinical relevance.

Objective

To assess the impact of a physician- and patient-friendly electronic PRO (ePRO) monitoring system on the quality of cardiovascular care in clinical practice.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This open-label, multicenter, pilot randomized clinical trial was phase 2 of a multiphase study that was conducted from October 2022 to October 2023 and focused on the implementation and evaluation of an ePRO monitoring system in outpatient clinics in Japan. During phase 1 (conducted from December 2021 to March 2022), this ePRO monitoring system was developed at a single outpatient center using feedback from patients and physicians. Eligible patients were older than 18 years with a clinical diagnosis of heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF), or coronary artery disease (CAD). Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to either the ePRO or control group. Statistical analysis was based on the intention-to-treat approach.

Intervention

Patients in the ePRO group were asked to complete the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12), Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (AFEQT), or Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) on smart tablets before their clinical examination. Results were reviewed by physicians at each outpatient visit. The control group received usual care consisting of medication management, lifestyle modification, and invasive procedures in accordance with clinical guidelines. Both groups had 5 monthly outpatient visits.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Patient satisfaction, quality of information (QOI) provided by physicians, and disease knowledge were assessed using questionnaires (eg, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire [PSQ]; score range: 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater patient satisfaction) at baseline and the fifth visit, over approximately 4 months.

Results

Of the 50 patients included, 48 (median [SD] age, 71.0 [62.3-75.0] years; 28 males [58.3%]) completed follow-up. The prevalence was 56.2% (n = 27) for HF, 75.0% (n = 36) for AF, and 10.4% (n = 5) for CAD. The distribution of PRO measures used was 21 patients (43.8%) for KCCQ-12, 24 (50.0%) for AFEQT, and 3 (6.2%) for SAQ. Compared with the control group, the ePRO group showed significant improvements in mean (SD) PSQ score (0.16 [2.06] vs 1.61 [1.75]; P = .01) and QOI score regarding treatment (-0.12 [0.53] vs 0.35 [0.71]; P = .01). The ePRO group exhibited a greater increase in the PSQ score regarding communication (-0.12 [0.53] vs 0.43 [0.90]; P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, implementation of the ePRO monitoring system significantly enhanced patient-physician communication and the clarity of physicians' explanations about treatment. These findings suggest that the ePRO monitoring system is capable of supporting patient-centered cardiovascular care.

Trial Registration

University Hospital Medical Information Network Identifier: UMIN000049251.

Characterising symptom clusters in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to leverage natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning clustering analyses to (1) identify co-occurring symptoms of patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and (2) describe clinical and sociodemographic correlates of symptom clusters.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional retrospective analysis using electronic health records data. Adults who underwent AF ablation between 2010 and 2020 were included. Demographic, comorbidity and medication information was extracted using structured queries. Ten AF symptoms were extracted from unstructured clinical notes (n=13 416) using a validated NLP pipeline (F-score=0.81). We used the unsupervised machine learning approach known as Ward's hierarchical agglomerative clustering to characterise and identify subgroups of patients representing different clusters. Fisher's exact tests were used to investigate subgroup differences based on age, gender, race and heart failure (HF) status.

RESULTS

A total of 1293 patients were included in our analysis (mean age 65.5 years, 35.2% female, 58% white). The most frequently documented symptoms were dyspnoea (64%), oedema (62%) and palpitations (57%). We identified six symptom clusters: generally symptomatic, dyspnoea and oedema, chest pain, anxiety, fatigue and palpitations, and asymptomatic (reference). The asymptomatic cluster had a significantly higher prevalence of male, white and comorbid HF patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We applied NLP and machine learning to a large dataset to identify symptom clusters, which may signify latent biological underpinnings of symptom experiences and generate implications for clinical care. AF patients' symptom experiences vary widely. Given prior work showing that AF symptoms predict adverse outcomes, future work should investigate associations between symptom clusters and postablation outcomes.

Rate versus rhythm control in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation: Effects of the treatment timing on health status outcomes

BACKGROUND

Recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that applying rhythm control during the early stage of atrial fibrillation (AF) may lead to improved clinical outcomes. However, the effects of this modality on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) have not been fully investigated. We aimed to assess the association between the AF stage, determined by the time between AF diagnosis and referral to the cardiology clinic, and HRQoL outcomes.

METHODS

Using an outpatients-based multicenter AF registry (n = 3,313), we analyzed 2,070 patients with AF diagnosed within 5 years. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to AF stage: early and late AF (AF duration ≤1 and >1 year, respectively). All patients had HRQoL information collected at baseline and 1 year after their initial treatment (assessed via the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life-overall summary [AFEQT-OS] score, with higher scores reflecting better HRQoL). The change in AFEQT-OS was adjusted for patient characteristics using a generalized linear mixed model.

RESULTS

The early AF group (n = 1,644) was older (early, 68.5 ± 11.1, late, 64.4 ± 10.6 years, P < .001) and had more heart failure (early, 19.9%, late, 12.7%, P < .001) than the late AF group (n = 426). At 1 year after treatment, the adjusted changes in AFEQT-OS were similar in patients with rhythm (adjusted difference [SE], early, 8.4 [1.2], late, 7.2 [1.4], P = .15) or rate (early, 4.0 [0.7], late, 2.3 [1.4], P = .16) control, regardless of AF stage. Furthermore, the improvement in HRQoL was similar between early and late AF in patients undergoing catheter ablation (early, 10.2 [2.1], late, 9.8 [2.4], P = .78), whereas a significant difference was observed in those receiving antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone (early, 10.2 [1.4], late, 3.5 [2.2], P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Rhythm control therapy provided clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL, regardless of AF stage. For patients with impaired HRQoL, AF duration should not be a deterrent to treatment, especially catheter ablation.

Association between risk of obstructive sleep apnea and cognitive performance, frailty, and quality of life among older adults with atrial fibrillation

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Geriatric impairments and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are prevalent among older patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Little is known about the association between OSA and geriatric impairments, including frailty, cognitive performance, and AF-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to examine the associations of OSA with frailty, cognitive performance, and AF-related quality of life among older adults with AF.

METHODS

Data from the Systemic Assessment of Geriatrics Elements-AF study were used, which included AF participants 65 years and older and with a CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 2. The STOP-BANG questionnaire was used to assess the risk of OSA. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between risk of OSA and geriatric impairments, adjusting for sociodemographic, geriatric, and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 970 participants (mean age 75 years; 51% male) were studied. Of the 680 participants without a medical history of OSA, 26% (n = 179) of participants had a low risk of OSA, 53% (n = 360) had an intermediate risk, and 21% (n = 141) had a high risk for OSA. Compared to those with low risk of OSA, participants with an intermediate or high risk of OSA were more likely to be frail (adjusted odds ratio = 1.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-2.56; adjusted odds ratio = 3.00, 95% confidence interval: 1.69-5.32, respectively) in the fully adjusted models.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings identify a group of patients at high risk who would benefit from early screening for OSA. Future longitudinal studies are needed to assess the effect of OSA treatment on frailty, physical functioning, and quality of life among patients with AF.

CITATION

Mehawej J, Saczynski JS, Kiefe CI, et al. Association between risk of obstructive sleep apnea and cognitive performance, frailty, and quality of life among older adults with atrial fibrillation. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(2):469-475.