1
|
Vamos M, Zsigmond EJ, Biffi M, Gausz FD, Keller N, Kupo P, Szili-Torok T, Ziacchi M, Benz AP, Spittler R, Vagvolgyi A. EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF THE SUBCUTANEOUS IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR IN PATIENTS WITH AND WITHOUT OBESITY: A META-ANALYSIS. Heart Rhythm 2024:S1547-5271(24)02902-3. [PMID: 39019386 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) has emerged as an alternative to transvenous systems for preventing sudden cardiac death. However, concerns have been raised regarding its efficacy and safety in obese individuals. OBJECTIVE This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the S-ICD in patients with obesity by assessing the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and clinical outcomes. METHODS A comprehensive search of multiple databases was conducted for English-language peer-reviewed studies reporting clinical outcomes in S-ICD recipients with (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) and without obesity (BMI <30 kg/m2). Data on pre-implantation screening failure, defibrillation testing, complications, appropriate and inappropriate shocks, and survival were analysed using standard random-effect meta-analytical techniques. RESULTS Twenty-nine studies involving 20,486 patients were included. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean BMI values of patients with failed or successful preimplantation screening (mean difference -0.60 kg/m2, 95% CI -2.06 to 0.86). Obesity was associated with higher rates of failed defibrillation testing at ≤65J (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.39-3.35), and mal-/suboptimal positioning occurred more frequently in obese compared to non-obese patients (OR 3.37, 95% CI 1.76-6.44). Increased BMI as a continuous variable (per increase in 1 kg/m2 BMI) was associated with elevated defibrillation thresholds (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.08), a higher risk of complications (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.02-1.05), a trend towards increased number of appropriate shocks (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00-1.04), and no significant increase in the risk for inappropriate shocks (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.03). CONCLUSION This meta-analysis underscores the importance of considering obesity in S-ICD implantation decisions. While S-ICD remains effective in obese patients, attention to potential technical challenges and higher complication rates is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mate Vamos
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Division, Cardiology Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
| | - Elod-Janos Zsigmond
- Central Hospital of Northern Pest - Military Hospital, Budapest, Hungary; Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Mauro Biffi
- Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Flora Diana Gausz
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Division, Cardiology Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Nora Keller
- Central Pharmacy, Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical Centre, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Peter Kupo
- Heart Institute, Medical School, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Tamas Szili-Torok
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Division, Cardiology Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Matteo Ziacchi
- Department of Cardiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alexander P Benz
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Germany; Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Raphael Spittler
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Germany
| | - Anna Vagvolgyi
- Endocrinology and Diabetology Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yap SC, Oosterwerff EFJ, Boersma LVA, van der Stuijt W, Lenssen A, Hahn SJ, Knops RE. Acute human defibrillation performance of a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator with an additional coil electrode. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:1649-1656. [PMID: 37579867 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) delivers 80 J shocks from an 8 cm left-parasternal coil to a 59 cm3 left lateral pulse generator (PG). A system that defibrillates with lower energy could significantly reduce PG size. Computer modeling and animal studies suggested that a second shock coil either parallel to the left-parasternal coil or transverse from the xiphoid to the PG pocket would significantly reduce the defibrillation threshold. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to acutely assess the defibrillation efficacy of parallel and transverse configurations in patients receiving an S-ICD. METHODS Testing was performed in patients receiving a conventional S-ICD system. Success at 65 J was required before investigational testing. A second electrode was temporarily inserted from the xiphoid incision connected to the PG with an investigational Y-adapter. Phase 1 (n = 11) tested the parallel configuration. Phase 2 (n = 21) tested both parallel and transverse configurations in random order. RESULTS This study enrolled 35 patients (28 males (80%); mean age 51 ± 17 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 40% ± 15%; body mass index 26 ± 4 kg/m2; prior myocardial infarction 46%; congestive heart failure 49%; cardiomyopathy 63%). Compared to the conventional S-ICD system, mean shock impedance decreased for both parallel (69 ± 15 Ω vs 86 ± 20 Ω; n = 33; P < .001) and transverse (56 ± 14 Ω vs 81 ± 21 Ω; n = 20; P < .001) configurations. Shock success rates at 20, 30, and 40 J were 55%, 79%, 97%, and 25%, 70%, 90% for parallel and transverse configurations, respectively. Defibrillation threshold testing was well tolerated with no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION Adding a second shock coil, particularly in the parallel configuration, significantly reduced the impedance and had a high likelihood of defibrillation success at energies ≤40 J. This may enable the development of a smaller S-ICD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sing-Chien Yap
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus Medisch Centrum, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Lucas V A Boersma
- Department of Cardiology, St Antonious Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willeke van der Stuijt
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Reinoud E Knops
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gupta D. Epidural blood patch placement with patient wearing wearable cardioverter defibrillator: To be or Not to be. Ann Card Anaesth 2023; 26:476-477. [PMID: 37861595 PMCID: PMC10691573 DOI: 10.4103/aca.aca_71_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Deepak Gupta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator should be considered for all patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indication. Heart Rhythm O2 2022; 3:589-596. [PMID: 36340497 PMCID: PMC9626906 DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
|
5
|
Budrejko S, Kempa M, Krupa W, Królak T, Fabiszak T, Raczak G. Real-Life Inter-Rater Variability of the PRAETORIAN Score Values. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:9700. [PMID: 35955057 PMCID: PMC9368382 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: The PRAETORIAN score is a tool developed for postoperative evaluation of the position of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems. The aim of our study was to evaluate the real-life inter-rater variability of the PRAETORIAN score, based on chest radiographs of S-ICD patients reviewed by independent clinical raters. (2) Methods: Postoperative chest X-rays of patients that underwent S-ICD implantation were evaluated by five clinical raters who gave values of the PRAETORIAN score. Ratings were then compared in a fully crossed manner to determine the inter-rater variability of the attributed scores. (3) Results: In total, 87 patients were included in the study. In the case of the most important final risk category of the PRAETORIAN score, the mean Light's kappa was 0.804, the Fleiss' kappa was 0.249, and the intraclass correlation was 0.38. The final risk category was identically determined by all five raters in 75.86% of patients, by four raters in 14.94%, and by three raters in 9.20% of patients. (4) Conclusions: The overall inter-rater variability of the PRAETORIAN score in a group of electrophysiologists experienced in S-ICD implantation, yet previously naive to the PRAETORIAN score, and self-trained in its utilization, was only modest in our study. Appropriate use of the score might require training of clinical raters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Szymon Budrejko
- Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Maciej Kempa
- Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krupa
- Department of Cardiology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Tomasz Królak
- Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland
| | - Tomasz Fabiszak
- Department of Cardiology and Internal Diseases, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, 87-100 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Raczak
- Department of Cardiology and Electrotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-214 Gdansk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Droghetti A, Pecora D, Maffè S, Badolati S, Pepi P, Nicolis D, Lupo P, Lovecchio M, Valsecchi S, Ottaviano L. "Shift and cover technique": conservative management of complications for the rescue of S-ICD subcutaneous implantable defibrillator systems. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2022:10.1007/s10840-022-01312-y. [PMID: 35927601 DOI: 10.1007/s10840-022-01312-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of complications has been shown to be lower with subcutaneous implantable defibrillator (S-ICD) than with conventional ICDs. Given the low frequency of complications, experience of how to manage them is limited. In this paper, we describe generator- and lead-related complications recorded in a series of S-ICD patients, and we propose our conservative approach to managing them. METHODS The study cohort consisted of S-ICD patients who were referred to our institution owing to generator- or lead-related complications requiring surgical intervention. With our "shift and cover" approach, the system component involved is moved from its original position to an alternative, more protected location. In the case of the generator, this involves moving it to an intermuscular pocket. In the case of infections at the parasternal scar, the electrode sleeve is moved away from its original location, stitched, and then covered with the muscular fascia. RESULTS Fourteen S-ICD patients were referred to our institution owing to system-related complications. Complications involved the generator in 7 cases (deep pocket infections with erosion, extrusion, or pain), the lead in 5 cases (parasternal infections at the xyphoid incision site), and both the generator and the lead in 2 cases. Complications were managed without completely removing the device and resolved in a single surgical session with no intraoperative complications. During defibrillation testing, the first shock at 65 J was effective in all patients. The shock impedance after revision was significantly lower than that measured during first implantation (59 ± 10 Ohm versus 86 ± 24 Ohm, P = 0.013). In all cases, the cosmetic result was satisfactory. No complications or recurrent infections were reported at the 12-month follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS The proposed conservative approach was successful in managing S-ICD complications. The revision procedure allowed to optimize the system configuration in terms of the defibrillation vector, resulting in lower shock impedance values and better device positioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Droghetti
- Thoracic Surgery Division, ASST Mantova, Viale Lago Paiolo 10, 46100, Mantua, Italy.
| | - Domenico Pecora
- Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiovascular Department, Poliambulanza Institute Hospital Foundation, Brescia, Italy
| | - Stefano Maffè
- Division of Cardiology, Ospedale SS, Trinità, Borgomanero Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Sandra Badolati
- Department of Cardiology, S. Andrea Hospital, La Spezia, Italy
| | | | | | - Pierpaolo Lupo
- Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Center,I.R.C.C.S. MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni (MI), Italy
| | | | | | - Luca Ottaviano
- Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology unit, Cardiothoracic Department Clinical Institute S. Ambrogio, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Migliore F, Viani S, Ziacchi M, Ottaviano L, Francia P, Bianchi V, De Bonis S, De Filippo P, Tola G, Vicentini A, Taravelli E, Calvi VI, Lovecchio M, Valsecchi S, Botto GL. The “Defibrillation Testing, Why Not?” survey. Testing of subcutaneous and transvenous defibrillators in the Italian clinical practice. IJC HEART & VASCULATURE 2022; 38:100952. [PMID: 35071727 PMCID: PMC8761693 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.100952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Defibrillation testing (DT) can be omitted in patients undergoing transvenous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (T-ICD) implantation, but it is still recommended for patients at risk for a high defibrillation threshold and for ICD generator changes. Moreover, DT is still recommended on implantation of subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD). The aim of the present survey was to analyze the current practice of DT during T-ICD and S-ICD implantations. Methods In March 2021, an ad hoc questionnaire on the current performance of DT and the standard practice adopted during testing was completed at 72 Italian centers implanting S-ICD and T-ICD. Results 48 (67%) operators reported never performing DT during de-novo T-ICD implantations, while no operators perform it systematically. The remaining respondents perform it for patients at risk for a high defibrillation threshold. DT is never performed at T-ICD generator change. At the time of de-novo S-ICD implantation, DT is never performed by 9 (13%) operators and performed systematically by 48 (66%). The remaining operators frequently omit DT in patients with more severe systolic dysfunction. DT is not performed at S-ICD generator change by 92% of operators. DT is conducted by delivering a first shock energy of 65 J by 60% of operators, while the remaining 40% test lower energy values. Conclusions In current clinical practice, most operators omit DT at T-ICD implantation, even when still recommended in the guidelines. DT is also frequently omitted at S-ICD implantation, and a wide variability exists among operators in the procedures followed during DT.
Collapse
|
8
|
Guarracini F, Marini M, Strazzanti M, Bonmassari R, Guarracini S, Di Mauro M, Droghetti A. Successful implantation of S-ICD using the intermuscular two-incision technique in a patient with severe pectus excavatum. Clin Case Rep 2021; 9:e05143. [PMID: 34853691 PMCID: PMC8617332 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.5143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
A patient with severe pectus excavatum, dilated ischemic heart disease, and indication for defibrillator implantation for primary prevention of sudden death underwent successful ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block and parasternal block with intermuscular two-incision technique implantation with no complications. At follow-up, all the parameters resulted stable with excellent signal sensing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Michele Di Mauro
- Cardio‐Thoracic Surgery Unit, Heart and Vascular CentreMaastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC)MaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Forleo GB, Gasperetti A, Breitenstein A, Laredo M, Schiavone M, Ziacchi M, Vogler J, Ricciardi D, Palmisano P, Piro A, Compagnucci P, Waintraub X, Mitacchione G, Carrassa G, Russo G, De Bonis S, Angeletti A, Bisignani A, Picarelli F, Casella M, Bressi E, Rovaris G, Calò L, Santini L, Pignalberi C, Lavalle C, Viecca M, Pisanò E, Olivotto I, Curnis A, Dello Russo A, Tondo C, Love CJ, Di Biase L, Steffel J, Tilz R, Badenco N, Biffi M. Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and defibrillation testing: A propensity-matched pilot study. Heart Rhythm 2021; 18:2072-2079. [PMID: 34214647 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.06.1201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, only a few comparisons between subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) patients undergoing and those not undergoing defibrillation testing (DT) at implantation (DT+ vs DT-) have been reported. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to compare long-term clinical outcomes of 2 propensity-matched cohorts of DT+ and DT- patients. METHODS Among consecutive S-ICD patients implanted across 17 centers from January 2015 to October 2020, DT- patients were 1:1 propensity-matched for baseline characteristics with DT+ patients. The primary outcome was a composite of ineffective shocks and cardiovascular mortality. Appropriate and inappropriate shock rates were deemed secondary outcomes. RESULTS Among 1290 patients, a total of 566 propensity-matched patients (283 DT+; 283 DT-) served as study population. Over median follow-up of 25.3 months, no significant differences in primary outcome event rates were found (10 DT+ vs 14 DT-; P = .404) as well as for ineffective shocks (5 DT- vs 3 DT+; P = .725). At multivariable Cox regression analysis, DT performance was associated with a reduction of neither the primary combined outcome nor ineffective shocks at follow-up. A high PRAETORIAN score was positively associated with both the primary outcome (hazard ratio 3.976; confidence interval 1.339-11.802; P = .013) and ineffective shocks alone at follow-up (hazard ratio 19.030; confidence interval 4.752-76.203; P = .003). CONCLUSION In 2 cohorts of strictly propensity-matched patients, DT performance was not associated with significant differences in cardiovascular mortality and ineffective shocks. The PRAETORIAN score is capable of correctly identifying a large percentage of patients at risk for ineffective shock conversion in both cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessio Gasperetti
- Cardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy; Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital "Umberto I-Salesi-Lancisi", Ancona, Italy; Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | | - Marco Schiavone
- Cardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Matteo Ziacchi
- Cardiology Unit, Sant'Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Julia Vogler
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | | | | | - Agostino Piro
- Cardiology Department, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Compagnucci
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital "Umberto I-Salesi-Lancisi", Ancona, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giulia Russo
- Cardiology Department, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| | - Silvana De Bonis
- Cardiology Department, Ferrari Hospital, Castrovillari, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Andrea Angeletti
- Cardiology Unit, Sant'Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Antonio Bisignani
- Cardiology Department, Ferrari Hospital, Castrovillari, Cosenza, Italy
| | | | - Michela Casella
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital "Umberto I-Salesi-Lancisi", Ancona, Italy
| | - Edoardo Bressi
- Cardiology Department, Policlinico Casilino, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Leonardo Calò
- Cardiology Department, Policlinico Casilino, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Santini
- Cardiology Department, Ospedale G.B. Grassi, Ostia, Italy
| | | | - Carlo Lavalle
- Cardiology Department, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Viecca
- Cardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ennio Pisanò
- Cardiology Department, Vito Fazzi Hospital, Lecce, Italy
| | - Iacopo Olivotto
- Cardiomyopathy Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Curnis
- Cardiology Department, Spedali Civili Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonio Dello Russo
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, University Hospital "Umberto I-Salesi-Lancisi", Ancona, Italy
| | - Claudio Tondo
- Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing, Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Charles J Love
- Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Jan Steffel
- Cardiology Department, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roland Tilz
- Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
| | | | - Mauro Biffi
- Cardiology Unit, Sant'Orsola Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|