Severity, control, and responsiveness in asthma

GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma

The Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma, better known by its acronym in Spanish GEMA, has been available for more than 20 years. Twenty-one scientific societies or related groups both from Spain and internationally have participated in the preparation and development of the updated edition of GEMA, which in fact has been currently positioned as the reference guide on asthma in the Spanish language worldwide. Its objective is to prevent and improve the clinical situation of people with asthma by increasing the knowledge of healthcare professionals involved in their care. Its purpose is to convert scientific evidence into simple and easy-to-follow practical recommendations. Therefore, it is not a monograph that brings together all the scientific knowledge about the disease, but rather a brief document with the essentials, designed to be applied quickly in routine clinical practice. The guidelines are necessarily multidisciplinary, developed to be useful and an indispensable tool for physicians of different specialties, as well as nurses and pharmacists. Probably the most outstanding aspects of the guide are the recommendations to: establish the diagnosis of asthma using a sequential algorithm based on objective diagnostic tests; the follow-up of patients, preferably based on the strategy of achieving and maintaining control of the disease; treatment according to the level of severity of asthma, using six steps from least to greatest need of pharmaceutical drugs, and the treatment algorithm for the indication of biologics in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma based on phenotypes. And now, in addition to that, there is a novelty for easy use and follow-up through a computer application based on the chatbot-type conversational artificial intelligence (ia-GEMA).

Expert Opinion on Practice Patterns in Mild Asthma After the GINA 2019 Updates: A Major Shift in Treatment Paradigms from a Long-Standing SABA-Only Approach to a Risk Reduction-Based Strategy with the Use of Symptom-Driven (As-Needed) Low-Dose ICS/LABA

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This expert opinion, prepared by a panel of chest disease specialists, aims to review the current knowledge on practice patterns in real-life management of mild asthma and to address the relevant updates in asthma treatment by The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) to guide clinicians for the best clinical practice in applying these new treatment paradigms.

RECENT FINDINGS

On the basis of the emerging body of evidence suggesting the non-safety of short-acting β2-agonists (SABA)-only therapy and comparable efficacy of the as-needed inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)-formoterol combinations with maintenance ICS regimens, GINA recently released their updated Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention Guide (2019). The new GINA 2019 recommendations no longer support the SABA-only therapy in mild asthma but instead includes new off-label recommendations such as symptom-driven (as-needed) low-dose ICS-formoterol and "low dose ICS taken whenever SABA is taken." The GINA 2019 asthma treatment recommendations include a major shift from long-standing approach of clinical practice regarding the use of symptom-driven SABA treatment alone in the management of mild asthma. This expert opinion supports the transition from a long-standing SABA-only approach to a risk reduction-based strategy, with the use of symptom-driven (as-needed) low-dose ICS/LABA in mild asthma patients, particularly in those with poor adherence to controller medications. The thoughtful and comprehensive approach of clinicians to these strategies is important, given that the exact far-reaching impact of this major change in management of mild asthma in the real-world settings will only be clarified over time.

Real-world patterns and implications of short-acting β2-agonist use in patients with asthma in the United States

BACKGROUND

Short-acting β₂-agonist (SABA) use is one measure reflecting asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the associations between real-world SABA use and severe asthma exacerbations in the United States.

METHODS

Patients with asthma 12 years of age or older receiving SABA in the IBM MarketScan research databases of US administrative claims from September 30, 2014, to September 30, 2016, were evaluated. Patients with 12 months' continuous eligibility before and after their first SABA claim (index SABA), an asthma diagnosis before through 60 days postindex, and either one additional SABA or at least 1 maintenance fill(s) were included. SABA claims postindex (including index fill) were grouped as follows: low: index only; medium: 2 to 3 canisters per year; and high: 4 or more canisters per year. Differences in SABA exposure with respect to disease severity groups and severe asthma exacerbations (hospitalizations, emergency visits, or outpatient systemic corticosteroids) were analyzed by analysis of variance and χ² (significance, P ≤ .05).

RESULTS

A total of 135,540 patients were included: 62.8% women; mean (SD) age, 40.9 (18.3) years; SABA fills per 12-months postindex: 3.0(2.7). Furthermore, 28% of patients filled 1 SABA, 47% 2 to 3, and 25% 4 or more canisters per year. Despite higher maintenance medication possession ratio with increasing SABA (low, 0.53 (0.37); medium, 0.59 (0.35); high, 0.66 (0.32)), annual exacerbation rate per person per year and percent of patients within each SABA group having at least 1 exacerbation rose as SABA fills increased (low, 1.00 (1.45), 45.8%; medium, 1.20 (1.62), 54.3%; high, 1.50 (1.94), 58.7%). Mean SABA fills differed between patients with 0 exacerbation, 2.8 (2.6); 1 exacerbation, 2.9 (2.5); and 2 or more exacerbations, 3.3 (2.9).

CONCLUSION

Exacerbation risk increased with increasing SABA fills. Management strategies ensuring adequate anti-inflammatory therapy delivered to the airways when symptoms occur may be needed to mitigate asthma morbidity.

Understanding asthma-specific quality of life: moving beyond asthma symptoms and severity

This study identifies the unique contributions of asthma severity, symptoms, control and generic measures of quality of life (QoL) to asthma-specific QoL, as measured by the 12-item RAND Negative Impact of Asthma on Quality of Life scale (RAND-IAQL-12).Using a sample of 2032 adults with asthma, we conducted multiple regression analyses that sequentially examined hypothesised predictors of asthma-specific QoL. The change in variance accounted for and total unique variance accounted for is calculated as hypothesised predictors are added in each step.Our results indicate that asthma severity and asthma symptoms are strong predictors of asthma-specific QoL only when not controlling for aspects of asthma control. In regression models that include other aspects of asthma control, the contributions of both asthma symptoms and severity were substantially reduced, with asthma control and aspects of QoL related to social roles and activities emerging as the strongest predictors of asthma-specific QoL.These findings suggest that researchers measuring the impact of asthma on QoL should also consider the importance of asthma control as measured by the RAND Asthma Control Measure (RAND-ACM) and generic QoL scales that measure aspects of daily life that are uniquely affected by asthma.

Assessment of asthma control: the SERENA study

BACKGROUND

Several studies suggest that many asthmatic subjects have uncontrolled asthma. The control of asthma is now considered the major goal of therapy.

OBJECTIVES

to ascertain the level of asthma control, by Asthma Control Test (ACT), in "real-life" clinical practice and the potential risk factors for uncontrolled disease in patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta-adrenergic agonists (LABA).

METHODS

SERENA is a multi-centre, cross-sectional, 6-month observational, non-interventional study carried out in 16 Pulmonary Units in Italy. Asthmatic outpatients aged over 18, undergoing treatment with ICS at medium-high daily doses associated with LABA, were enrolled. The patients were divided in 3 subgroups according to the level of asthma control by ACT score (25:controlled; 20-24:partly controlled; <20: uncontrolled).

RESULTS

Out of a total of 548 patients, 396 met the inclusion criteria. Only 9.1% of patients had asthma controlled, while partly controlled and uncontrolled asthma accounted for 39.6% and 51.3% respectively. The mean age was 54.5 ± 15.8 and the mean duration of asthma was 16.1 ± 14.1 years. There were more females than males (63% vs 37%) and females had highest prevalence of uncontrolled asthma (63.1%). The mean values of FEV1% predicted were lower in the uncontrolled group (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with at least 1 exacerbation, unscheduled visit and/or admissions was lower in controlled (22.2%, 8.3%, 8.3%) than in partly controlled (50%, 38.6%, 9.2%) and uncontrolled (83.2%, 66.2%, 27.8%) groups (p < 0.0001). The multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis identified female sex, FEV1 and exacerbations as the strongest independent factors associated with the uncontrolled disease.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance in clinical practice of a periodic assessment by a validated asthma control instrument and exacerbations/health care contacts during previous year. Clinicians should be aware that a significant proportion of patients can have uncontrolled asthma, despite regular pharmacological treatment.

Evaluation of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute guidelines impairment domain for classifying asthma control and predicting asthma exacerbations

BACKGROUND

Accurate assessment of asthma control may help predict future asthma exacerbations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate asthma guidelines impairment domain components as predictors of exacerbations in severe/difficult-to-treat asthma.

METHODS

Children (aged 6-11 years; n = 289) and adolescents/adults (aged ≥ 12 years; n = 2,094) with complete baseline and 12-month data from The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma Outcomes and Treatment Regimens study were included. Asthma was categorized as very poorly controlled, not well-controlled, and well-controlled using impairment domain components. Effects of omitting each component on very poorly controlled and not well controlled groups were examined. Multivariable logistic regression determined the relationship of components in predicting asthma exacerbations.

RESULTS

Omission of individual impairment domain components led to misclassification of asthma control in 11% to 39% of patients. A baseline exacerbation was the strongest independent predictor of exacerbation at month 12 in children (odds ratio = 2.94; P < .001) and adolescents/adults (odds ratio = 2.93; P < .001). In children, very poorly controlled asthma-based short-acting β2-agonist use was associated with a 2-fold higher exacerbation risk (odds ratio = 2.03; P = .011). In adolescents/adults, not well controlled or very poorly controlled asthma based on short-acting β2-agonist use (odds ratio = 1.49), lung function (odds ratio = 1.66), and the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire (odds ratio = 1.94) were also independent predictors of exacerbations (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the combined use of individual components of the impairment domain increases the sensitivity of identifying patients at high risk for future asthma exacerbations, specific components may be more important than others in severe/difficult-to-treat asthma. Prior exacerbations, short-acting β2-agonist use, lung function, and (in adolescents/adults) the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire were independent predictors of exacerbations.

Impact of anxiety and depression on disease control and quality of life in asthma patients

INTRODUCTION

Patients with asthma also tend to have anxiety and depression. These comorbidities may affect asthma control and quality of life. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of anxiety and depression on asthma control and quality of life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional study of asthma outpatients was conducted at two hospitals in the Basque Country (northern Spain). Data collected included sociodemographic variables, asthma symptoms, treatment, number of exacerbations, level of control, quality of life, presence of psychological morbidities, and level of physical activity. Spirometry was performed in accordance with the recommendations of the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery.

RESULTS

Among 354 asthmatics, 77% had poor or partial control of their condition, 31% had anxiety alone, 2% had depression alone, and 10% had anxiety plus depression. Poor asthma control was associated with anxiety plus depression (odds ratio (OR): 3.61; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-12.41) as well as with female patients (OR: 1.85; 95% CI: 1.11-3.10). Anxiety had an independent effect on reduced quality of life across all domains; anxiety plus depression had an even greater effect.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with asthma, anxiety and depression adversely affect asthma control and quality of life, raising the possibility that treating these psychological comorbidities could improve asthma control and quality of life.

Fuzzy rule-based expert system for evaluating level of asthma control

Asthma control is a final goal of asthma therapy process. Despite outstanding progress in discovering various variables affecting asthma control levels, disregarding some of them by physicians and variables' inherent uncertainty are the major causes of underestimating of asthma control levels and as a result asthma morbidity and mortality. In this paper, we provide an intelligent fuzzy system as a solution for this problem. Inputs of this system are composed of 14 variables organized in five modules of respiratory symptoms severity, bronchial obstruction, asthma instability, current treatment, and quality of life. Output of this system is degree of asthma control defined in the score (0-10). Evaluation of performance of this system by 42 asthmatic patients at asthma, allergy, immunology research center of Emam Khomeini hospital, Tehran, Iran reinforces that the system's results not only correspond with the evaluations of experienced asthma physicians, but represents slight differences in the levels of asthma control between asthmatic patients.

Asthma Severity in patients initiating controller monotherapy versus combination therapy

BACKGROUND

Asthma treatment guidelines recommend medications based on the level of asthma control.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate differences in asthma control between patients who initiated asthma controller monotherapy versus combination therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Children (5-16 years; n = 488) and adults (17-80 years; n = 530) with asthma and no controller therapy in the prior 6 months were included. Telephone surveys were conducted within 5 days of filling a new asthma controller prescription with either the caregiver of children or the adult patient. Demographics, asthma control before therapy, and asthma-related resource use were assessed for patients initiating monotherapy (filling one asthma controller prescription) and combination therapy (filling more than one controller medication or a fixed-dose combination).

RESULTS

Mean pediatric age was 10 years; 53% were male. Mean adult age was 47 years; 25% were male. There were no significant differences in asthma control score between patients receiving monotherapy and combination therapy. Children on combination therapy did not have more nighttime awakening or short-acting β-agonist use but were more likely to have been hospitalized due to asthma attack (p = .05) and have more unscheduled (p = .0374) and scheduled (p = .009) physician visits. Adults on combination therapy were more likely to have been hospitalized due to asthma attack (p < .05) and have regular doctor visits for asthma (p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of asthma control scores in the 4 weeks before index medication suggests that asthma severity during a treatment-free period did not differ significantly for patients initiating controller monotherapy versus combination therapy. From these findings, it appears that although physicians may not focus on asthma control when choosing the intensity of initial controller therapy, the intensity of health-care encounters may be an influence.

Uniform definition of asthma severity, control, and exacerbations: document presented for the World Health Organization Consultation on Severe Asthma

Asthma is a global health problem affecting around 300 million individuals of all ages, ethnic groups and countries. It is estimated that around 250,000 people die prematurely each year as a result of asthma. Concepts of asthma severity and control are important in evaluating patients and their response to treatment, as well as for public health, registries, and research (clinical trials, epidemiologic, genetic, and mechanistic studies), but the terminology applied is not standardized, and terms are often used interchangeably. A common international approach is favored to define severe asthma, uncontrolled asthma, and when the 2 coincide, although adaptation may be required in accordance with local conditions. A World Health Organization meeting was convened April 5-6, 2009, to propose a uniform definition of severe asthma. An article was written by a group of experts and reviewed by the Global Alliance against Chronic Respiratory Diseases review group. Severe asthma is defined by the level of current clinical control and risks as "Uncontrolled asthma which can result in risk of frequent severe exacerbations (or death) and/or adverse reactions to medications and/or chronic morbidity (including impaired lung function or reduced lung growth in children)." Severe asthma includes 3 groups, each carrying different public health messages and challenges: (1) untreated severe asthma, (2) difficult-to-treat severe asthma, and (3) treatment-resistant severe asthma. The last group includes asthma for which control is not achieved despite the highest level of recommended treatment and asthma for which control can be maintained only with the highest level of recommended treatment.

Quarterly assessment of short-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist use as a predictor of subsequent health care use for asthmatic patients in the United States

PURPOSE

An annual time frame for risk assessment may not account for the variable course of asthma. The purpose of this study was to determine whether excessive short-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist (SABA) dispensed quarterly was associated with asthma exacerbations in the subsequent quarter.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort analysis included 93,604 health plan members aged 6-56 years with >or=2 years of continuous enrollment (2003-2007), an asthma diagnosis, and asthma prescription claims. The amount of SABA dispensed in claims (metered-dose inhaler and nebulized) was converted to canister equivalents (CEs) in the first observation quarter and categorized as 0, 0.5-3, and >or=3 (excessive SABA use). Asthma exacerbation risk (hospitalization, emergency department [ED] visit, or oral corticosteroid [OCS] claim in the subsequent quarter) was assessed using logistic regression. Covariates used in the regression models were age, sex, geographic region, comorbidities, specialist consultation, asthma controller medication use, and asthma severity.

RESULTS

The cohort included 33,951 patients aged 6-17 years (36%) and 59,653 aged 18-56 years (64%); 64% had 0 SABA CE, and 5% had >3 SABA CEs. Compared with 0 CE, excessive SABA use (>3 CEs) was associated with an increased likelihood of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 3.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.89-5.27) and an ED/urgent care (UC) visit (adjusted OR: 3.14, 95% CI: 2.32-4.28).

CONCLUSION

The risk of an asthma exacerbation was associated with excessive SABA use in the previous quarter. Assessment of excessive SABA dispensed during a calendar quarter can be used to identify patients at increased exacerbation risk in the subsequent quarter.

From the page to the clinic: Implementing new National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines

The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program's (NAEPP) revised guidelines, the Expert Panel Report 3 (EPR-3), published in 2007, represents a shift in the approach to asthma: the EPR-3 recommends that clinicians think of asthma as a chronic disease with an inflammatory basis. EPR-3 guidelines also represent a shift in the treatment paradigm for asthma in line with the shift in approach: although symptomatic relief is still necessary, the primary goal of asthma treatment is now long-term control, with the aim of minimizing exacerbation frequency and severity and limiting possible permanent airway damage that can result from frequent asthma exacerbations. To help clinicians implement the new EPR-3 guidelines into daily practice, the NAEPP's Guidelines Implementation Panel has identified 6 key action-focused recommendations. This article describes those recommendations and the evidence supporting them.

Initial test of the seattle asthma severity and control questionnaire: a multidimensional assessment of asthma severity and control

BACKGROUND

The Seattle Asthma Severity and Control Questionnaire (SASCQ) was designed as a short, sensitive, and quantitative measure of asthma severity, impairment, and risk.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the distribution of responses to the SASCQ in a diverse asthma population and to determine whether the questionnaire is associated with other measures of asthma severity and control.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study of 188 asthmatic patients was conducted in a large academic primary care network. Asthma severity was confirmed in a subgroup of 44 patients by means of an in-person interview and lung function measurement.

RESULTS

The SASCQ score had a nearly normal distribution across the heterogeneous population and less of a floor effect than the number of asthma-free days. The SASCQ score showed a higher symptom burden in the mildest asthmatic patients compared with nonasthmatic controls. Asthma severity evaluated using the questionnaire was correlated with asthma severity evaluated by means of in-person interview and with controller medication class. The SASCQ score was associated with primary care visits for asthma, emergency department treatment for asthma, days missed from work, and confidence to control asthma symptoms; the associations between these measures of impairment and risk were all stronger for the SASCQ score than for asthma-free days.

CONCLUSIONS

The SASCQ is a quantitative measure of asthma that accurately discriminates between established levels of asthma severity and that is associated with other measures of asthma control and risk.

Management of asthma: new approaches to establishing control

PURPOSE

The high burden of asthma indicates suboptimal control of this chronic condition. This review describes approaches for establishing asthma control based on an understanding of potential issues in the achievement and maintenance of asthma control, recent changes in asthma management guidelines that facilitate attainment of treatment goals, and the importance of the healthcare provider-patient partnership to emphasize treatment based on asthma control.

DATA SOURCES

Review of the published literature, asthma management guidelines, and patient asthma education resources.

CONCLUSIONS

Asthma control is best achieved by patient-oriented versus disease-oriented management strategies that incorporate a combination of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment modalities. Tools that assess and monitor asthma may facilitate the achievement and maintenance of asthma control. Key components of an optimal management strategy include solid partnerships between healthcare providers and patients, comprehensive patient and caregiver education, personalized written asthma action plans, patient-reported evaluation of symptom control, appropriate drug therapy, strategies for improving compliance with asthma medication regimens, and a treatment algorithm that outlines the facets of asthma management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Information presented in this article will guide nurse practitioners in helping patients with asthma achieve and maintain long-term disease control.

Control of asthma

Control is the aim of asthma management and clinical trials show that control can be achieved in the majority of patients. However, population surveys show that poorly controlled asthma still imposes a considerable burden. This fact has led to a re-evaluation of the international asthma guidelines and the updated 2006 and 2007 GINA and NAEPP guidelines suggest that the level of control should be used as the key feature for the classification and management of asthma. Furthermore, in the latest guidelines, a clearer definition of control is given and new tools for the assessment and monitoring of control are instituted. In order to achieve asthma control, not only relevant pharmacological treatment but, the establishment of a good patient-doctor relationship, proper education of the asthmatic patient, reduction of exposure to triggers and treatment of co-morbidities are pivotal issues and must be ensured.

The effect of sex on asthma control from the National Asthma Survey

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated conflicting results with regard to differences in asthma control between the sexes.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify sex differences in short-term and long-term measures of asthma control in adults from the National Asthma Survey.

METHODS

This study analyzed data from the National Asthma Survey (Four-State sample) sponsored by the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Asthma control was compared between the sexes based on short-term (recent symptoms, asthma attacks, and albuterol use) and long-term (asthma attacks, work days lost, and urgent-care visits and hospitalizations in the prior year) measures. Composite scores for short-term and long-term control were calculated based on any single measure of poor asthma control and based on a sum of poor asthma control measures.

RESULTS

Women were more likely to have poor short-term asthma control based on any measure (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.20; CI, 1.01-1.44) or sum of measures (adjusted OR, 1.24; CI, 1.08-1.53) compared with men. Women also demonstrated worse asthma control based on any uncontrolled long-term measure (adjusted OR, 1.52; CI, 1.29-1.79) or sum of measures (adjusted OR, 1.68; CI, 1.45-1.93). These findings were present despite higher reported inhaled corticosteroid use and scheduled health care visits for asthma among women.

CONCLUSIONS

Women demonstrated worse asthma control compared with men with regard to several short-term and long-term measures, despite reporting higher rates of inhaled corticosteroid use and routine asthma care visits. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether these findings are due to differences in health reporting or to pathophysiologic differences in asthma between the sexes.

Phenotypic predictors of long-term response to inhaled corticosteroid and leukotriene modifier therapies in pediatric asthma

BACKGROUND

In children with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma, identification of phenotypic predictors to guide selection of a controller regimen is essential.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify phenotypic characteristics having predictive value for the difference in treatment responses between twice-daily fluticasone and once-daily montelukast.

METHODS

Data from the Pediatric Asthma Controller Trial were assessed with multivariate analysis. Outcomes included the change in asthma control days (ACDs), FEV(1), peak expiratory flow, and time to first asthma exacerbation measured over a 1-year treatment period.

RESULTS

The mean age was 9.6 +/- 2.1 years, 60% were male, 50% had a parental history of asthma, and 78% had positive aeroallergen skin prick test responses. The mean percent predicted prebronchodilator FEV(1) was 97.8% +/- 12.9%, the median PC(20) value was 0.93 mg/mL, and the median exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) level was 25.2 ppb. A history of parental asthma best predicted the expected treatment benefit with fluticasone compared with montelukast in terms of gain in ACDs (adjusted P = .02) and time to first exacerbation (adjusted P = .05). Increased baseline eNO levels predicted the differential treatment response for fluticasone regarding the gain in ACDs (adjusted P = .01). Prior inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use (adjusted P = .01) and low PC(20) values (adjusted P = .03) each predicted the expected treatment benefit with fluticasone over montelukast regarding time to first exacerbation. No phenotypic characteristics predicted treatment benefits for montelukast over fluticasone for either outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians treating children with a parental history of asthma, increased eNO levels, low PC(20) values, or a history of ICS use can expect the best long-term outcomes with ICS therapy compared with treatment with leukotriene receptor antagonists.

The Asthma Control and Communication Instrument: a clinical tool developed for ethnically diverse populations

BACKGROUND

Lower levels of quality asthma care among racially diverse populations might be due to inaccurate disease status assessments. The Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (ACCI) is a new tool that captures patient report of disease status during routine care.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to test the ACCI's psychometric properties in a racially diverse population.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study. Subjects were recruited from specialist and generalist urban outpatient clinics. The ACCI and measures of asthma control, quality of life, lung function, and specialist rating of asthma status were collected. Four ACCI domains were separately validated: Acute Care, Bother, Control, and Direction. Principal component analysis, internal consistency, concurrent, discriminative, known-groups validity, and accuracy were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy asthmatic patients (77% female subjects, 55% black) participated. ACCI Control domain internal consistency was 0.80. ACCI Bother, Control, and Direction domains showed strong concurrent validity with asthma control and quality-of-life measures (all P < .001). ACCI Acute Care and Direction domains showed strong concurrent validity with individual validation items (all P < .001). The ACCI Control domain discriminated clinically important levels of disease status measured by asthma control, quality of life (both P < .001), and percent predicted peak expiratory flow rate (P = .005) and was associated with specialist rating of disease status (P < .001), confirming known-groups validity. The accuracy of the ACCI Control domain in classifying patients with uncontrolled asthma was very good (area under the curve, 0.851; 95% CI, 0.742-0.95870). Results were similar for both black and white subjects.

CONCLUSION

The ACCI is a promising clinical tool that measures asthma disease status during routine health care and is valid for use in both black and white populations.

Introduction of Asthma APGAR tools improve asthma management in primary care practices

OBJECTIVE

Primary care asthma management is often not compatible with national evidence-based guidelines. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and impact of the Asthma APGAR tools to enhance implementation of asthma guideline-compatible management in primary care practices.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-four primary care practices across the US.

METHODS

This is a mixed methods study. Quantitative data were used to assess changes in guideline recommended asthma management including use of daily controller therapy, planned care visits, and education and information documentation before and after implementation of the Asthma APGAR. Qualitative data from focus group sessions were used to assess health care professional and patient perceived usability and value of the Asthma APGAR tools during office visits for asthma.

RESULTS

Implementing the Asthma APGAR tools in the 24 practices was associated with enhanced asthma visit-related medical record documentation including significant increases in recording of activity limitations due to asthma and asthma symptom frequency, asthma medication nonadherence, asthma triggers, and the patients' perceived response to therapy (p < 0.01 for each item). Some care processes also increased significantly including assessment of inhaler technique and prescribing of daily controller therapy among patients with persistent asthma. Focus groups of patients and of clinical staff reported that the Asthma APGAR tools were easy to use, "made sense" and "improved care" was given and received.

CONCLUSIONS

The Asthma APGAR tools are feasible to implement in primary care practices and their implementation is associated with increased guideline-compliant asthma management.

Asthma 2008: targeting immunoglobulin E to achieve disease control

Traditionally, practice guidelines have recommended a step-wise approach to treatment based on asthma severity and lung function. However, increasing evidence suggests that asthma may not be adequately controlled in many patients with moderate-to-severe disease despite aggressive therapy, and that regularly evaluating the level of asthma control achieved in individual patients may be more effective than disease severity in guiding treatment decisions. This is reflected in updated asthma guidelines from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program, which advocate regular assessment of asthma control in terms of the current impairment and future risk associated with the disease. Guideline-recommended options for patients with persistent, moderate-to-severe immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated asthma have recently been enhanced by the inclusion of omalizumab. This change is based on growing evidence for the central role of IgE in airway inflammation and asthma and the clinical effectiveness of blocking IgE with omalizumab, a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody. Omalizumab significantly reduced asthma exacerbations and improved lung function and symptoms in randomized controlled studies of patients inadequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting beta(2)-agonist therapy; these benefits for reducing asthma impairment and risk were maintained during steroid dose reductions. Omalizumab is well tolerated, although patients should be monitored for possible rare anaphylactic reactions.

Correlation between the Korean version of Asthma Control Test and health-related quality of life in adult asthmatics

The Asthma Control Test (ACT) is a patient-completed questionnaire developed to assess asthma control. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) in asthmatics has shown relatively low correlations with parameters of asthma control and the relationship between the ACT and HRQL in asthmatics is yet unclear. Because revalidations of translated versions of questionnaires are critical for its utilization, we first sought to validate the Korean version of ACT and then to evaluate the relationship between the ACT and HRQL. Patients (n=117) completed the ACT and asthma-related quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) at 3 physician visits. Pulmonary function was measured and an asthma specialist rated asthma control. The Korean version of ACT was found to be reliable, valid, and responsive to changes in asthma control over time up to three consecutive visits. ACT scores correlated significantly (p=0.001) with symptoms domain (r=0.72), activity domain (r=0.65), emotional domain (r=0.69), and environmental domain (r=0.67) of AQLQ. In conclusion, the Korean version of the ACT was found to be a reliable and valid tool for measuring asthma control, and to correlate well with AQLQ scores. Moreover, the ACT was responsive to changes in AQLQ scores over time.

Stability of asthma control with regular treatment: an analysis of the Gaining Optimal Asthma controL (GOAL) study

BACKGROUND

Uncontrolled asthma is characterized by variability. Current asthma guidelines recommend focussing on the achievement and maintenance of control but few studies have examined in detail, using composite measures of control, the stability and potential duration of control once achieved. In this post-hoc analysis of the results of the Gaining Optimal Asthma controL (GOAL) study, we examine the association between the level of asthma control achieved during the step-up phase of the study and the stability of control experienced during the maintenance phase.

METHODS

GOAL was a 1-year, randomized, stratified, double-blind study of 3421 patients with uncontrolled asthma, which compared salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination with fluticasone propionate in achieving two composite, guideline-based measures of control: totally controlled and well-controlled asthma. We analysed the proportion and duration of time spent in control, the effect of treatment on asthma stability, and the impact of asthma control stability on unscheduled use of healthcare resources.

RESULTS

In patients achieving well-controlled or totally controlled asthma, at least well-controlled asthma was maintained for a median of almost 3 and 6 months, and for more than 85% and 95% of weeks of follow-up, respectively. A high level of stability was confirmed in a Markov analysis investigating transitional probability of change in control status. Variability in control was associated with increased probability of an unscheduled healthcare resource use (odds ratio: 1.06, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients achieving guideline-defined control can maintain at least a similar level of control with regular, stable dosing, with little likelihood of losing control.

Does current asthma control predict future health care use among black preschool-aged inner-city children?

OBJECTIVES

Factors predictive of future asthma must be identified among young inner-city children, who suffer disproportionately from asthma. We investigated whether current asthma control predicts future asthma-related health care use among inner-city preschool-aged children with asthma.

METHODS

A total of 150 inner-city preschool-aged children with asthma were followed prospectively for 6 months. At baseline, symptom frequency and reliever-medication use were assessed to classify children into National Asthma Education and Prevention Program-derived control categories. Long-term controller-medication use was also assessed, as well as asthma-related health care use at baseline and at 3 and 6 months.

RESULTS

The mean age was 4.4 years, 92% were black, and 39% reported long-term controller use. At baseline, 37% were classified as having mild-intermittent, 17% had mild-persistent, 21% had moderate-persistent, and 25% had severe-persistent asthma control. Significant changes in asthma control were observed over time, including 46% of children originally categorized with mild-intermittent asthma who had worsened asthma control by 3 months. Asthma control significantly predicted future health care use 3 months later but not 6 months later. Multivariate analyses showed that, once control status was known, reported use of long-term controller medication added little additional predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

Among inner-city preschool-aged children, significant fluctuations in asthma control occur as early as 3 months after assessment. Poor control but not long-term controller-medication use is an independent predictor of future asthma-related health care use at 3 months but is not significantly predictive of 6-month outcomes. Therefore, clinicians caring for inner-city children with asthma should consider reassessing asthma control at least every 3 months to identify those at highest future risk and to provide early interventions.

Relationship between ARIA classification and drug treatment in allergic rhinitis and asthma

INTRODUCTION

The Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines provide a stepwise treatment to rhinitis, which classifies the disease according to its duration and severity.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to verify whether these variables influence drug prescriptions for rhinitis and asthma.

METHODS

A multi-centre cross-sectional pharmaco-epidemiological survey was carried out on 1,610 allergic rhinitis patients and the relationship between the clinical features of rhinitis and drug therapy for rhinitis and asthma was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1,321 adult patients were enrolled. Mild intermittent rhinitis was diagnosed in 7.7%of the patients, moderate/severe intermittent in 17.1%, mild persistent in 11.6%, and moderate/severe persistent in 63.6%. A high level of rhinitis-asthma comorbidity (616/1,321 = 46.6%) was found. The majority of patients [1,060 (80.24%)] were treated. Significant associations between the severity of rhinitis and the presence of therapy (P = 0.008), the use of oral antihistamines (P < 0.001), topical nasal steroids (P = 0.020) and systemic steroids (P = 0.005) were found. A weak association was found between the features of rhinitis and the therapy for asthma, and vice versa the comorbidity with asthma increases the prescription of inhalant (P < 0.001) and oral steroids (P = 0.015) to treat rhinitis.

CONCLUSION

The severity of rhinitis influences patient request for rhinitis therapy and the type of medication more than the duration. These features of rhinitis seem to poorly influence asthma therapy. As the ARIA classification is able to reveal a relevant impairment notwithstanding therapy, its role in treated patients merits further study.

The relationship between asthma-specific quality of life and asthma control

Few studies have quantitatively addressed the relationship between asthma-specific quality of life and asthma control as assessed by validated tools. Questionnaires were completed at home by a random sample of 542 adult asthmatic patients. The correlations of the two asthma control tools (Asthma Control Test and Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire) with the quality of life tool (mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire) were strongest with the symptoms and activity domains (r = 0.63-0.77); lower with the emotions domain (r = 0.57-0.64); and lowest with the environment domain (r = 0.38-0.43). Asthma control tools reflect the symptoms and activity themes of asthma quality of life well, but reflect the environmental domain less well.

Patients' perception of asthma severity

OBJECTIVES

To identify variables patients use to determine the severity of their asthma, the perceived severity (PS), using a fuzzy decision-making analysis (FDMA). To compare these variables with those involved in the assessment of asthma severity according to the global initiative for asthma (GINA) guidelines, the objective severity (OS).

PATIENTS

Outpatients (51 men, 62 women), aged (m+/-SD) 42.9+/-16.3 years with (% patients) mild intermittent (6.2), mild persistent (15.9), moderate (65.5) and severe (12.4) asthma.

DESIGN

Cross sectional, observational study.

METHODS

Both OS (rated by doctors) and PS (rated by patients) were rated as mild intermittent, mild persistent, moderate, or severe. Variables involved in OS assessment, variables self-assessed by patients (dyspnea, perceived treatment efficacy, asthma-related quality of life questionnaire [AQLQ]), patients' sociodemographic characteristics, and asthma characteristics, were evaluated with questionnaires. These variables were pooled, and considered as potential variables patients might use to determine their PS. They were tested against the PS measurement using FDMA. This identified variables patients actually used to determine PS.

RESULTS

On the day of consultation, 68.1% of patients classed their asthma as mild intermittent or mild persistent, 23.9% as moderate persistent, and 8.0% as severe persistent. There was a significant discrepancy (p<0.01) between PS and OS with a clear patient tendency to underestimate asthma severity as compared to OS. Patients determined PS level according to variables assessing their asthma perception, i.e., AQLQ measures and dyspnea, but not variables involved in OS assessment, such as symptom frequency or knowledge of their peak flow rates. Duration of asthma and treatment characteristics were also involved.

CONCLUSION

FDMA identified variables patients used to determine PS. It highlighted a discrepancy between patients' and doctors' perceptions of asthma severity, suggesting that assessment of asthma severity should consider both patients' and doctors' perceptions of the disease and includes an AQLQ measure.

Asthma control, severity, and quality of life: quantifying the effect of uncontrolled disease

BACKGROUND

Current practice guidelines emphasize the importance of attaining asthma control. We sought to quantify the degree of quality-of-life impairment associated with different levels of asthma control.

METHODS

We analyzed prospective data for 987 adults in The Epidemiology and Natural History of Asthma: Outcomes and Treatment Regimens (TENOR) study. Asthma control was assessed by using the Asthma Therapy Assessment Questionnaire, a validated index of control problems ranging from 0 to 4. Disease-specific quality of life and preference-based health utilities were assessed after 12 months of follow-up by using the Mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and EuroQoL 5-D (EQ-5D). We used multiple linear regression to model the relationship between asthma control and the AQLQ and EQ-5D while controlling for severity classification and lung function.

RESULTS

Asthma control varied widely, even within a population with predominantly moderate-to-severe disease. An inverse relationship was observed between the number of asthma control problems and quality of life. Specifically, poorer control at baseline predicted worse AQLQ and EQ-5D scores at follow-up. Asthma control remained an independent predictor of disease-specific quality of life and general health in multivariate models and was a better longitudinal predictor of health status than asthma severity at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Poor asthma control is associated with a substantial degree of impairment and predicts quality of life at 12 months, even after taking baseline asthma severity into account.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Self-assessed measures of asthma control might help to identify and manage those patients at greatest risk for future health impairment.

Real-world Evaluation of Asthma Control and Treatment (REACT): Findings from a national Web-based survey

BACKGROUND

Despite health initiatives for advancing the management of asthma, evidence suggests that many asthmatic subjects have uncontrolled disease. However, the prevalence of uncontrolled asthma in the United States is not known and has not been fully characterized.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the prevalence, morbidity, and factors associated with uncontrolled asthma in a nationally representative sample of patients with moderate-to-severe asthma using standard asthma medications.

METHODS

A Web-based survey was administered to patients with diagnoses of asthma for at least 1 year who were receiving multiple controller medications. The Asthma Control Test score was used to stratify respondents into controlled and uncontrolled cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 1812 patients were assessed; 809 (45%) had controlled asthma, and 1003 (55%) had uncontrolled asthma. Most patients had health care coverage and received care from a general practitioner; a large proportion of patients with controlled asthma (74%) and patients with uncontrolled asthma (65%) reported never receiving an asthma action plan. Inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting beta-agonist was the most common medication regimen in patients with controlled asthma (60%) and patients with uncontrolled asthma (48%) patients. Patients with uncontrolled asthma reported significantly higher rates of health care use. Several comorbidities were predictive of uncontrolled asthma.

CONCLUSION

Uncontrolled asthma is highly prevalent (55%) in patients using standard asthma medications. There is need for improved asthma care in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, including a global evaluation of asthma control, implementation of treatment plans and asthma control tests, and addressing comorbid conditions.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Improved asthma care requires broader assessments of asthma control, including asthma-related health care and medication use, comorbidities, and the implementation of treatment plans and formal asthma control tests.

Zileuton added to low-dose inhaled beclomethasone for the treatment of moderate to severe persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the therapeutic effects of oral zileuton tablets combined with low-dose beclomethasone compared to doubling the dose of beclomethasone, in improving lung function and reducing asthma symptoms.

METHODS

Randomized, active-control, double-blind, parallel, multi-center study of zileuton (400 or 600 mg QID)+200 microg beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) BID versus placebo+BDP 400 microg BID in asthmatics with baseline FEV(1) percent predicted values between 40% and 80% following a single-blind ICS (BDP 200 microg BID) 2-week run-in. During the 3-month double-blind treatment period, assessments included safety, daytime and nighttime symptoms, acute asthma exacerbations, beta(2)-agonist use, AM and PM peak expiratory flow (PEF) and FEV(1).

RESULTS

The addition of a 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) inhibitor added to a low-dose of BDP showed no significant difference in FEV(1) compared to doubling the dose of BDP. FEV(1) improved in all 3 treatment groups, with mean increases of 10% with zileuton 600 mg QID+BDP 200 microg BID, 12% with zileuton 400mg QID+BDP 200 microg BID, and 11% with BDP 400 microg BID by study end. Within each treatment group, there were significant improvements in asthma symptoms and AM and PM PEF compared to baseline. No significant differences were observed between groups with regards to salbutamol use, acute asthma exacerbations, the requirement for oral/parenteral corticosteroids and adverse clinical events.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of a 5-LO inhibitor added to low-dose beclomethasone may be an alternative to higher-doses of ICS in patients unable to achieve sufficient asthma control on low-dose ICS therapy.

GINA guidelines on asthma and beyond

Clinical guidelines are systematically developed statements designed to help practitioners and patients make decisions regarding the appropriate health care for specific circumstances. Guidelines are based on the scientific evidence on therapeutic interventions. The first asthma guidelines were published in the mid 1980s when asthma became a recognized public health problem in many countries. The Global Initiative on Asthma (GINA) was launched in 1995 as a collaborative effort between the NHLBI and the World Health Organization (WHO). The first edition was opinion-based but updates were evidence-based. A new update of the GINA guidelines was recently available and it is based on the control of the disease. Asthma guidelines are prepared to stimulate the implementation of practical guidelines in order to reduce the global burden of asthma. Although asthma guidelines may not be perfect, they appear to be the best vehicle available to assist primary care physicians and patients to receive the best possible care of asthma.

Advances in pediatric asthma 2006

Because the outcomes experienced in adult asthma often result from pathophysiology that begins in early childhood, this year's summary focuses on recent advances in pediatric asthma. This past year, we have learned that early intervention with inhaled corticosteroids in childhood asthma reduces morbidity but does not alter the natural history of asthma. Theme issues over the last year focused attention on severe asthma and black box warnings. Both of these themes significantly affect the management of childhood asthma. Responsiveness to asthma treatment is heterogeneous even among patients with asthma of similar severity. This heterogeneity calls attention to the importance of assessing control and adjusting treatment accordingly. We are now moving toward an individualized approach to asthma therapy and searching for biomarkers and genetics as a resource to guide treatment. To improve asthma control, we must continue to obtain information on early asthma, severe asthma, asthma exacerbations, and methods to improve asthma control. Evaluation and management of severe asthma in children include verification of the diagnosis, assessment for coexisting illnesses, and identification of effective treatment strategies directed to adherence, medication delivery, and combination therapy. Application of biomarkers and genetics could be useful tools in individualizing our approach to the management of childhood asthma.

Reliability and predictive validity of the Asthma Control Test administered by telephone calls using speech recognition technology

BACKGROUND

The Asthma Control Test (ACT) has been validated in a paper and pencil version but has not been validated for use by telephone.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to provide validation data for the ACT administered by interactive telephone calls using speech recognition technology.

METHODS

The ACT was administered to patients who confirmed a diagnosis of physician-diagnosed asthma, and information regarding race/ethnicity, smoking, and asthma course was also obtained during the call. Asthma emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and oral corticosteroid and beta-agonist canister dispensings were assessed for the 12 months after the date of each patient's call. Internal consistency reliability and predictive validity were assessed.

RESULTS

Asthma Control Test scores (higher indicates better control) were completed by 2244 patients and were inversely related to black or Hispanic race/ethnicity and smoking. Reliability was 0.83. ACT scores were significantly related to emergency hospital care and oral corticosteroid and beta-agonist dispensings over the period of the subsequent 6 and 12 months. After adjusting for demographic characteristics, a score < or = 15 was associated significantly with an increased 12-month risk of emergency hospital care (odds ratio [OR], 2.5), oral corticosteroid dispensings (OR, 2.6) and dispensing of more than 6 beta-agonist canisters (OR, 6.8) compared with a score > or = 20.

CONCLUSION

These data support the reliability and predictive validity of the ACT administered by interactive telephone calls using speech recognition technology.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The ACT can be used for outreach or follow-up by means of interactive telephone calls using speech recognition technology.