1
|
Aaneland H, Larsen MH, Helseth S, Wahl AK. Quality Appraisal of Quality of Life Research in Children and Adolescents with Food Allergy: A Systematic Review. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2024:1. [PMID: 38885630 DOI: 10.1159/000539113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Quality of life (QOL) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents with food allergies have been an important and steadily growing field of research for the past 20 years. There seem to be conceptual and methodological challenges that might influence the face validity of QOL and HRQOL research in general health research, but this has not been investigated in pediatric and adolescent food allergy research up until now. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the QOL and HRQOL studies on food allergy in children and adolescents under the age of 18. METHODS The systematic review was conducted on studies purporting to measure QOL or HRQOL in children and adolescents with food allergies. The literature search was developed in Ovid MEDLINE and databases used in the review were Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, and Scopus. Studies were evaluated based on a set of face validity criteria developed by Gill and Feinstein in 1994 and refined by Moons et al. in 2004. RESULTS Out of 61 studies eligible for the review, 11 (18%) defined QOL or HRQOL and two distinguished QOL from HRQOL. The Food Allergy Quality of Life (FAQLQ) instrument series is the most frequently used HRQOL measurement among the studies included. QOL and HRQOL were employed interchangeably in half of the studies, some of them also using a third term in addition. CONCLUSION Our findings lead to the conclusion that the research field investigated contains methodological and conceptual shortcomings regarding QOL and HRQOL. An increased awareness toward the terminology as well as consideration of points to reflect upon will be beneficial, as this will also improve the validity of future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilde Aaneland
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marie Hamilton Larsen
- Department of Postgraduate Studies, Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sølvi Helseth
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Astrid Klopstad Wahl
- Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bergmann MM, Santos AF. Basophil activation test in the food allergy clinic: its current use and future applications. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2024:1-8. [PMID: 38591129 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2024.2336568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The basophil activation test (BAT) has shown evidence of high sensitivity and high specificity to support the diagnosis of IgE-mediated allergy. It is a functional test that uses live cells analyzed by flow cytometry and thus needs to be performed within 24h of blood collection. BAT has shown to be reproducible and reliable when tested in a clinical diagnostic laboratory with standardized protocols and flow cytometry settings. AREAS COVERED In this review, we summarize the evidence to support clinical use of BAT and the next steps required for clinical implementation for an improve clinical care for patients with suspected IgE-mediated food allergy. EXPERT OPINION BAT has recently been included in Clinical Guidelines of Food Allergy Diagnosis and its implementation in clinical practice depends largely on availability. Proposed clinical applications of the BAT include: distinction between food allergy and asymptomatic IgE sensitization; determination of food allergic status to peanut, tree nuts and seeds in polysensitized children; evaluation of tolerance to baked egg and baked milk in egg and milk allergic children; identification of patients at high-risk of severe allergic reactions; monitoring for spontaneous resolution of food allergy; confirmation of eligibility for specific treatments of food allergy; prediction and monitoring of response to immunomodulatory treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel M Bergmann
- Pediatric allergy unit, Department of Women, Children and Adolescents, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Pediatrics, Centro Pediatrico del Mendrisiotto, Mendrisio, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Science, Università della Svizzera Italiana (USI), Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wipperman MF, Gayvert KM, Atanasio A, Wang CQ, Corren J, Covarrubias A, Setliff I, Chio E, Laws E, Wolfe K, Harel S, Maloney J, Herman G, Orengo JM, Lim WK, Hamon SC, Hamilton JD, O'Brien MP. Differential modulation of allergic rhinitis nasal transcriptome by dupilumab and allergy immunotherapy. Allergy 2024; 79:894-907. [PMID: 38279910 DOI: 10.1111/all.16001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nasal epithelial cells are important regulators of barrier function and immune signaling; however, in allergic rhinitis (AR) these functions can be disrupted by inflammatory mediators. We aimed to better discern AR disease mechanisms using transcriptome data from nasal brushing samples from individuals with and without AR. METHODS Data were drawn from a feasibility study of individuals with and without AR to Timothy grass and from a clinical trial evaluating 16 weeks of treatment with the following: dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds interleukin (IL)-4Rα and inhibits type 2 inflammation by blocking signaling of both IL-4/IL-13; subcutaneous immunotherapy with Timothy grass (SCIT), which inhibits allergic responses through pleiotropic effects; SCIT + dupilumab; or placebo. Using nasal brushing samples from these studies, we defined distinct gene signatures in nasal tissue of AR disease and after nasal allergen challenge (NAC) and assessed how these signatures were modulated by study drug(s). RESULTS Treatment with dupilumab (normalized enrichment score [NES] = -1.73, p = .002) or SCIT + dupilumab (NES = -2.55, p < .001), but not SCIT alone (NES = +1.16, p = .107), significantly repressed the AR disease signature. Dupilumab (NES = -2.55, p < .001), SCIT (NES = -2.99, p < .001), and SCIT + dupilumab (NES = -3.15, p < .001) all repressed the NAC gene signature. CONCLUSION These results demonstrate type 2 inflammation is an important contributor to the pathophysiology of AR disease and that inhibition of the type 2 pathway with dupilumab may normalize nasal tissue gene expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Claire Q Wang
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | - Jonathan Corren
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Angelica Covarrubias
- Clinical Research Division, Jonathan Corren, MD. Inc., Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ian Setliff
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | - Erica Chio
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Sivan Harel
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | | | - Gary Herman
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | - Jamie M Orengo
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | - Wei Keat Lim
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | - Sara C Hamon
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rodríguez Del Río P, Álvaro-Lozano M, Arasi S, Bazire R, Escudero C, Patel N, Sandoval-Ruballos M, Vazquez-Ortiz M, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Blümchen K, Dunn Galvin A, Deschildre A, Greenhawt M, Schnadt S, Riggioni C, Remington BC, Turner P, Fernandez Rivas M. Evaluation of clinical outcomes of efficacy in food allergen immunotherapy trials, COFAITH EAACI task force. Allergy 2024; 79:793-822. [PMID: 38263695 DOI: 10.1111/all.16027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Food allergy is a global public health problem that until recent years lacked any aetiological treatment supported by academy, industry and regulators. Food immunotherapy (AIT) is an evolving treatment option, supported by clinical practice and industry trial data. Recent AIT meta-analyses have highlighted the difficulty in pooling safety and efficacy data from AIT trials, due to secondary heterogeneity in the study. An EAACI task force (CO-FAITH) initiated by the Paediatric Section was created to focus on AIT efficacy outcomes for milk, egg and peanut allergy rather than in trial results. A systematic search and a narrative review of AIT controlled clinical trials and large case series was conducted. A total of 63 manuscripts met inclusion criteria, corresponding to 23, 21 and 22 studies of milk, egg and peanut AIT, respectively. The most common AIT efficacy outcome was desensitization, mostly defined as tolerating a maintenance phase dose, or reaching a particular dose upon successful exit oral food challenge (OFC). However, a large degree of heterogeneity was identified regarding the dose quantity defining this outcome. Sustained unresponsiveness and patient-reported outcomes (e.g. quality of life) were explored less frequently, and to date have been most rigorously described for peanut AIT versus other allergens. Change in allergen threshold assessed by OFC remains the most common efficacy measure, but OFC methods suffer from heterogeneity and methodological disparity. This review has identified multiple heterogeneous outcomes related to measuring the efficacy of AIT. Efforts to better standardize and harmonize which outcomes, and how to measure them must be carried out to help in the clinical development of safe and efficacious food allergy treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Rodríguez Del Río
- Allergy Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
- FibHNJ, ARADyAL-RETICs RD16 /0006/0026 Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- IIS La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Montserrat Álvaro-Lozano
- Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Translational Research in Paediatric Specialities Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Raphaëlle Bazire
- Allergy Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
- FibHNJ, ARADyAL-RETICs RD16 /0006/0026 Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- IIS La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmelo Escudero
- Allergy Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
- FibHNJ, ARADyAL-RETICs RD16 /0006/0026 Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- IIS La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nandinee Patel
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Monica Sandoval-Ruballos
- Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- Department of Pediatrics, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Katharina Blümchen
- Division of Pneumology, Allergology and Cystic Fibrosis, Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Antoine Deschildre
- Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergy Department, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Lille, France
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurura, Colorado, USA
| | - Sabine Schnadt
- German Allergy and Asthma Association (DAAB), Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Carmen Riggioni
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
- Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Benjamin C Remington
- Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
- Remington Consulting Group B.V, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Turner
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Montserrat Fernandez Rivas
- Allergy Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense (UCM), IdISSC, ARADyAL, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dantzer JA, Kim EH. New Approaches to Food Allergy Immunotherapy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024; 12:546-552. [PMID: 37852441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
Food allergy is an increasing public health problem in children and adults. In addition to the risk of potentially severe reactions, food allergy can have a significant burden on quality of life, nutrition, cost of living, and social activities. Traditionally, treatment has primarily included strict food allergen avoidance and use of emergency medications to treat an allergic reaction. However, in recent years, there have been significant strides in the advancement of food allergy treatment, including the approval of the first and only approved therapy (peanut oral immunotherapy) for food allergy in 2020. Clinical trials have primarily focused on food allergen immunotherapy (oral, epicutaneous, sublingual). Building off of a foundation of promising data supporting the efficacy of food oral immunotherapy and our greater understanding of the underlying mechanism of immunotherapy, newer approaches, including alternative routes of delivery, adjuncts to therapy, modified allergens, and utilization in younger patients, aim to provide safer and more effective treatment approaches to the millions of patients burdened by food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Dantzer
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Baltimore, Md.
| | - Edwin H Kim
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Shin S, Jang S, Kim J, Song J, Park S, Kim Y, Lee MH, Kim HM, Choi YR, Jung M, Kim M, Lee JY, Baek J, Kim S, Kim J, Ahn K. Initial updosing phase of oral immunotherapy improves quality of life and psychological burden in parents of children with food allergy. Allergy Asthma Proc 2024; 45:128-136. [PMID: 38449018 DOI: 10.2500/aap.2024.45.240001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
Background: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) can impose psychological burdens on patients and their parents due to the necessary preparations and repeated adverse reactions. Objective: To investigate changes in quality of life (QoL) and psychological burden in parents of children receiving OIT for food allergy (FA). Methods: Children aged 3-13 years with FA were enrolled. Parents were asked to fill out the Korean versions of the Food Allergy Quality of Life-Parental Burden (FAQL-PB), the Korean versions of the Food Allergy Quality of Life-Parental Form (K-FAQLQ-PF), the Korean versions of the Beck Anxiety Inventory (K-BAI), and the Korean version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression before OIT (T1), after 2 months of updosing (T2), and after the end of the updosing phase (T3). Results: A total of 111 parents were enrolled. The total FAQL-PB scores were decreased at T2 and T3 compared with those at T1 (all p < 0.001). Greater improvement in the total FAQL-PB score at T2 was noted in parents with a higher parental burden (FAQL-PB score ≥ 74 points) at baseline than in those with a lower parental burden (p = 0.001). Among the K-FAQLQ-PF domains, "food anxiety" scores were decreased at T2 and T3 compared with those at T1 (p = 0.049 and p = 0.030, respectively), whereas there was no change in "social and dietary limitation" and "emotional impact" scores between T1 and T2 and between T1 and T3. However, no differences were observed in K-BAI and PHQ-9 scores between T1 and T2 and between T1 and T3. Conclusion: Our results suggest that OIT improves parental burden and QoL in parents of children with FA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanghee Shin
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sehun Jang
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jiwon Kim
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeongmin Song
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seeun Park
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeonghee Kim
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Hee Lee
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Mi Kim
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Ran Choi
- Allergy Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minyoung Jung
- Department of Pediatrics, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Minji Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Sejong, Korea
| | - Ji Young Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jihyun Baek
- Department of Psychology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sukyung Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea, and
| | - Jihyun Kim
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kangmo Ahn
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bartha I, Almulhem N, Santos AF. Feast for thought: A comprehensive review of food allergy 2021-2023. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2024; 153:576-594. [PMID: 38101757 PMCID: PMC11096837 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.11.918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 11/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
A review of the latest publications in food allergy over the past couple of years confirmed that food allergy is a major public health concern, affecting about 8% of children and 10% of adults in developed countries. The prevalence of food allergy varies around the world, with the increase being driven mainly by environmental factors, possibly together with genetic susceptibility to environmental changes. A precise diagnosis of food allergy is extremely important. Both new tests (eg, the basophil activation test) and improved optimization of information provided by existing tests (eg, the skin prick test and measurement of specific IgE level) can contribute to improving the accuracy and patients' comfort of food allergy diagnosis. Understanding the underlying immune mechanisms is fundamental to designing allergen-specific treatments that can be safe and effective in the long term. New discoveries of the immune response to food allergens, including T-cell and B-cell responses, have emerged. Novel therapeutic approaches are being trialed at various stages of development as attempts to allow for more active intervention to treat food allergy. Prevention is key to reducing the increase in prevalence. Early introduction of allergenic foods seems to be the most effective intervention, but others are being studied, and will, it is hoped, lead to modification of the epidemiologic trajectory of food allergy over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Bartha
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Noorah Almulhem
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, King Fahad Hospital of the University, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom; Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Upton JEM, Wong D, Nowak-Wegrzyn A. Baked milk and egg diets revisited. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2024; 132:328-336.e5. [PMID: 38151097 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.12.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Most children with milk and egg allergy are nonreactive to modified forms of milk and egg in bakery products such as muffins because of conformational changes in proteins. These baked milk (BM) and baked egg (BE) diets have become commonplace in the management of milk and egg allergy, respectively. Current laboratory- and skin test-based diagnostic approaches remain limited in their ability to predict BM/BE tolerance, resulting in various approaches to introduce these foods. One approach to introduce BM/BE is to offer a medically supervised oral food challenge and then advise dietary introduction of baked products for children who have tolerance. Another approach is adapted from a home-based protocol of graded ingestion of BM or BE originally intended for non-IgE mediated allergy, often referred to as a "ladder." The ladder advises home ingestion of increasing amounts of BM or BE. For children who have allergy to BM or BE, the ladder is essentially oral immunotherapy, although not always labeled or recognized as such. Risk assessment and education of patients suitable for home introduction are essential. A home approach that may be called a ladder can also be used to escalate diets after demonstrated tolerance of baked forms by introducing lesser cooked forms of milk or egg after tolerating BM or BE. A randomized controlled trial provided clear evidence that baked diets can hasten the resolution of IgE-mediated milk allergy. Moreover, BM/BE foods have an emerging role in the treatment of non-IgE-mediated allergy. There is tangential evidence for BM and BE diets in the prevention of IgE-mediated allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E M Upton
- SickKids Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Programme, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Dennis Wong
- SickKids Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Programme, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- Department of Pediatrics, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, NYU R. Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim S, Ahn K, Kim J. Practical issues of oral immunotherapy for egg or milk allergy. Clin Exp Pediatr 2024; 67:140-148. [PMID: 37350169 PMCID: PMC10915454 DOI: 10.3345/cep.2023.00234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Revised: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has been recommended to reduce parental burden related to strict allergen avoidance and induce desensitization and immune tolerance for patients with long-lasting allergies to hen's eggs (HE) or cow's milk (CM). OIT should be monitored by pediatric allergists specializing in OIT and oral food challenge tests to manage allergic reactions. Although a previous history of anaphylaxis or multiple food allergies is not a contraindication to OIT, it is contraindicated if the patient has uncontrolled asthma, a malignancy, active systemic autoimmune disorders, or diseases requiring treatment with beta-blockers. A variety of OIT protocols have been de veloped to ensure better outcomes and safe up-dosing, including adjunctive therapies with biologics. This review provides insight into the practical issues of various immunotherapy options for children with HE or CM allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukyung Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University School of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Kangmo Ahn
- Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jihyun Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xu Y, Zhang F, Mu G, Zhu X. Effect of lactic acid bacteria fermentation on cow milk allergenicity and antigenicity: A review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2024; 23:e13257. [PMID: 38284611 DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.13257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
Cow milk is a major allergenic food. The potential prevention and treatment effects of lactic acid bacteria (LAB)-fermented dairy products on allergic symptoms have garnered considerable attention. Cow milk allergy (CMA) is mainly attributed to extracellular and/or cell envelope proteolytic enzymes with hydrolysis specificity. Numerous studies have demonstrated that LAB prevents the risk of allergies by modulating the development and regulation of the host immune system. Specifically, LAB and its effectors can enhance intestinal barrier function and affect immune cells by interfering with humoral and cellular immunity. Fermentation hydrolysis of allergenic epitopes is considered the main mechanism of reducing CMA. This article reviews the linear epitopes of allergens in cow milk and the effect of LAB on these allergens and provides insight into the means of predicting allergenic epitopes by conventional laboratory analysis methods combined with molecular simulation. Although LAB can reduce CMA in several ways, the mechanism of action remains partially clarified. Therefore, this review additionally attempts to summarize the main mechanism of LAB fermentation to provide guidance for establishing an effective preventive and treatment method for CMA and serve as a reference for the screening, research, and application of LAB-based intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunpeng Xu
- School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian, Liaoning, P. R. China
| | - Feifei Zhang
- Liaoning Ocean and Fisheries Science Research Institute, Dalian, Liaoning, P. R. China
| | - Guangqing Mu
- Dalian Key Laboratory of Functional Probiotics, Dalian, Liaoning, P. R. China
| | - Xuemei Zhu
- School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian, Liaoning, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alfonso RMJ, Rubí IAK, Manuel TME, Roberto CB, Alejandra RCM, de Jesús MVI, Gabriela AGA, Vladimir BND, Lucía CG, Antonio CBJ, Sergio DM, Esther FFL, Manuel Enrique GPM, Ileana GCJ, Elena HHR, Elena LRA, Héctor MA, Carlos MN, José Antonio OM, Iván OGC, Rubén PV, Nicolás RMJ, Del Mar SDOGM, Gerardo SM, Eugenia URM, Liliana WD, Hideo WKG, Yvan V. Mexican consensus on cow's milk protein allergy. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2024; 52:24-37. [PMID: 38186191 DOI: 10.15586/aei.v52i1.958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to present the current views of a diverse group of experts on the diagnosis and treatment of Cow's Milk Protein Allergy (CMPA) in children under 2 years of age in Mexico. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study, led by a scientific committee of five experts in CMPA, was divided into six phases, including a modified Delphi process. A total of 20 panelists, all of whom were pediatric specialists, participated in administering a comprehensive 38-item questionnaire. The questionnaire was divided into two blocks: Diagnosis and Treatment (20 items each). RESULTS Consensus was reached on all the proposed items, with an agreement rate of over 70% for each of them. As a result, a diagnostic and treatment algorithm was developed that emphasized the reduction of unnecessary diagnostic studies and encouraged breastfeeding whenever possible. In cases where breast milk is not available, appropriate use of hypoallergenic formulas was recommended. In addition, recommendations on treatment duration and gradual reintroduction of cow's milk protein were provided. CONCLUSIONS The recommendations endorsed by 20 Mexican pediatricians through this study are applicable to everyday clinical practice, thereby enhancing the diagnosis and treatment of children under 2 years of age with CMPA. This, in turn, will foster improved health outcomes and optimize the utilization of healthcare resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Casas Guzik Lucía
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hospital Infantil de Morelia Eva Sámano de López Mateos, Morelia, México
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Méndez Nieto Carlos
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hospital Infantil de Especialidades, Ciudad Juárez, Mexico
| | | | | | - Peña Vélez Rubén
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hospital General de Puebla Dr. Eduardo Vázquez N., Puebla, Mexico
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Vandenplas Yvan
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, KidZ Health Castle, UZ Brussel; Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Szafron V, Rana R, Anvari S. Updates in food allergen immunotherapy. Curr Opin Pediatr 2023; 35:680-685. [PMID: 37417834 DOI: 10.1097/mop.0000000000001272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Food allergies are on the rise. Though allergen avoidance and management of acute reactions have been the backbone of therapy, complete avoidance and timely acute care is often not feasible. Food allergen immunotherapy (FAIT) is a novel and evolving treatment option intended to induce desensitization and potential sustained unresponsiveness (SU) to food allergens. This review addresses the methods, mechanisms, efficacy, and adverse effects of oral immunotherapy (OIT), sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), and epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) for food allergens in the published literature. RECENT FINDINGS Single FAIT has been most extensively studied in peanut, milk, and hen's egg allergic patients and has been successful in achieving desensitization in treated individuals through various modalities. Long-term data regarding SU is limited; however, current data suggests subsets of patients may be more likely to achieve SU compared to others. Other studies are actively assessing multifood AIT and novel FAIT protocols with adjunctive therapies. SUMMARY Food allergy constitutes a prevalent problem with far-reaching consequences. The emergence of FAIT may mitigate the burden of food allergy. Current evidence is promising for specific allergens and pediatric patient populations. Future studies are needed to further assess efficacy between different modalities of immunotherapy for food allergens across an age continuum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vibha Szafron
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Immunology, Allergy and Retrovirology
| | - Ruchit Rana
- B-Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Section of Immunology, Allergy and Rheumatology
| | - Sara Anvari
- Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Immunology, Allergy and Retrovirology
- Texas Children's Hospital, William T. Shearer Center for Human Immunobiology, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Upton JEM, Lanser BJ, Bird JA, Nowak-Węgrzyn A. Baked Milk and Baked Egg Survey: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Adverse Reactions to Foods Committee. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:2335-2344.e4. [PMID: 37236351 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.04.055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Most milk- and egg-allergic children can tolerate milk and egg in baked forms. Some allergists have extended the use of baked milk (BM) and baked egg (BE) to advocating for the stepwise introduction of small amounts of BM and BE to children who are reactive to larger amounts of BM and BE. Little is known about the practice of introducing BM and BE and existing barriers to this approach. The purpose of this study was to gather a current assessment of the implementation of BM and BE oral food challenges and diets for milk- and egg-allergic children. We conducted an electronic survey of North American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology members offering BM and BE introduction in 2021. The response rate was 10.1% of distributed surveys (72 of 711). Surveyed allergists had a similar approach to both BM and BE introduction. Demographic features of time in practice and region of practice were significantly associated with the odds of introducing BM and BE. A wide variety of tests and clinical features guided decisions. Some allergists determined BM and BE to be appropriate for home introduction and offered this for BM and BE more often than other foods. The use of BM and BE as a food for oral immunotherapy was endorsed by almost half of respondents. Less time in practice was the most significant factor associated with offering this approach. Published recipes were used and written information was widely provided to patients by most allergists. The wide practice variabilities reveal a need for more structured guidance about oral food challenges, in-office versus home procedures, and patient education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia E M Upton
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Bruce J Lanser
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Jewish Health and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colo
| | - J Andrew Bird
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Anna Nowak-Węgrzyn
- Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York, NY; Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ridley D, Abrams EM, Wong P, Chan ES. Challenges implementing recent recommendations of daily formula supplementation for allergy prevention and practical real-world options. Paediatr Child Health 2023; 28:208-211. [PMID: 37287476 PMCID: PMC10243975 DOI: 10.1093/pch/pxac121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The Canadian Paediatric Society's Position statement 'Dietary exposures and allergy prevention in high-risk infants' December 2021 provides recommendations for regular ingestion of cow's milk protein (CMP) once introduced in early infancy. These recommendations are based on evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) where researchers supported participants in adhering to diet recommendations. Real-life dilemmas that relate to dietary adherence including cost, food wastage, and practicality are not addressed and are the crux of where -evidence-based recommendations fail. This commentary highlights the difficulties in carrying out the proposed recommendation for regular ingestion of CMP in practice and offers three practical real-world options instead.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise Ridley
- Department of Nutrition Services, Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Elissa M Abrams
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter Wong
- Department of Paediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Edmond S Chan
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lodge CJ, Waidyatillake N, Peters RL, Netting M, Dai X, Burgess J, Hornung CJ, Perrett KP, Tang MLK, Koplin JJ, Dharmage SC. Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy for peanut, cow's milk, and hen's egg allergy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Transl Allergy 2023; 13:e12268. [PMID: 37488726 PMCID: PMC10314278 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising treatment for food allergies; however, safety is a concern. We synthesized evidence from the best randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on efficacy/safety of OIT for desensitization (DS) and remission (sustained unresponsiveness (SU)) in IgE mediated allergy to peanut, hen's eggs, and cow's milk. BODY: We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (Until Oct 22) identifying 16 eligible RCTs published in English measuring food allergy by food challenge at the beginning and at the end of the study. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess study quality. We found 18 eligible studies. There was evidence of efficacy for DS for all allergens: peanut (RR 11.32; 95% CI 5.93, 21.60, I2 49%, 8 studies); hen's egg (RR 4.67; 2.66, 8.21, I2 0%, 5 studies); cow's milk (RR 13.98; 3.51, 55.65, I2 0%, 4 studies) and evidence for SU for peanut (RR 7.74; 2.90, 20.69, I2 0%, 3 studies) and hen's egg (RR 6.91; 1.67, 28.57, I2 0%, 2 studies). Allergic events were increased with intervention, and risk of adrenaline use increased for peanut RR 2.96; 1.63, 5.35, I2 0%, 8 studies; egg RR 1.71; 0.42, 6.92, I2 0%, 6 studies; and milk RR 8.45; 2.02, 35.27, I2 0%, 4 studies. CONCLUSION We found strong evidence that peanut, hen's egg, and cow's milk OIT can induce DS and some evidence for remission. There was a high risk of allergic reactions. Generalizability to the entire food allergic population is not known.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Lodge
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nilakshi Waidyatillake
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachel L Peters
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Merryn Netting
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Women and Kids Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Xin Dai
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Burgess
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catherine J Hornung
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten P Perrett
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mimi L K Tang
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer J Koplin
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Child Research Centre, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Shyamali C Dharmage
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bartha I, Rodríguez Del Río P. Clinical outcomes of efficacy in food allergen immunotherapy trials. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2023; 23:239-245. [PMID: 37185829 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW With food allergy affecting millions of children worldwide, the consolidation of food allergen immunotherapy represents an encouraging therapeutic option, that might expand in the next few years to reach greater number of candidates. This review aims at providing a critical overview of the efficacy outcomes employed in food allergen immunotherapy trials (AIT). RECENT FINDINGS Understanding efficacy endpoints rely on identifying what and how these are being measured. Desensitization, as the efficacy of the therapy to increase the patient's reactivity threshold to the food during therapy, and Sustained Unresponsiveness, withholding such efficacy even if the therapy is withdrawn, are nowadays considered the main parameters of efficacy evaluation. Quality of life is a promising variable to capture food AIT impact from the patient's perspective.There is a relevant degree of heterogeneity across studies in outcomes definitions and also in oral food challenges design, the tool that is more spread to assess results, hampering study comparison. SUMMARY Interpreting the results of a clinical trial, and comparing data from different studies is an important task, both for the researcher and the clinician, that should be done after a careful analysis of the outcomes and the evaluation tools used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Bartha
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Paediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Pablo Rodríguez Del Río
- Allergy Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús
- FibHNJ, ARADyAL-RETICs RD16/RD16/0006/0026 Instituto de Salud Carlos III
- IIS La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mack DP, Greenhawt M, Anagnostou A. Are There Hidden Dangers Associated With Milk and Egg Dietary Advancement Therapy? THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:1056-1062. [PMID: 36581070 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Dietary advancement therapies (DATs) constitute a continuum spanning extensively heated item ingestion, progressive milk or egg ladders, and oral immunotherapy (OIT). These represent an evolution in food allergy management from strict avoidance to an active therapy that may modulate the immune system to develop tolerance to particular forms of the allergen. Many egg or milk individuals are tolerant to baked egg or milk at baseline, and regular consumption (at home ingestion) of baked milk or egg is a safe process with potential quality of life and immunologic benefit. Milk and egg ladders, developed for non-IgE mediated allergy, are increasingly being adapted to IgE-mediated allergy as a potentially safe at-home option for gradual dietary advancement. However, data are limited regarding how safe and effective these approaches are or what patient is best suited for which DAT. It is also unclear whether extensively heated allergen consumption and ladders are susceptible to the same patient-specific factors that affect day-to-day tolerance and safety in OIT. Several recent events involving near-fatal or fatal reactions to milk or egg products (all among patients with asthma) have highlighted that DATs are not risk-free, and that physician guidance in these therapies is essential. Such guidance may include obtaining informed consent before starting any DAT and instituting the same safe dosing rules for OIT across any form of DAT. This rostrum discusses practical concerns about the safety of DAT, and considerations regarding how clinicians can maximize patient protection while defining the safety and efficacy of real-world implementation of these concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Paul Mack
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Aikaterini Anagnostou
- Section of Immunology, Allergy, and Retrovirology, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Section of Immunology, Allergy, and Retrovirology, Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Özdemir PG, Sato S, Yanagida N, Ebisawa M. Oral Immunotherapy in Food Allergy: Where Are We Now? ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2023; 15:125-144. [PMID: 37021501 PMCID: PMC10079524 DOI: 10.4168/aair.2023.15.2.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Food allergy (FA) has become more prevalent and problematic in the last 2 decades, and it poses important individual, social, and economic burdens. Besides treating reactions induced by accidental exposure and periodic evaluation for acquiring natural tolerance, the primary management approach is still allergen avoidance as a global standard. However, an active therapeutic approach that can raise the reaction threshold or accelerate tolerance is needed. This review aimed to provide an overview and the latest evidence of oral immunotherapy (OIT), which has recently been used in the active treatment of FA. FA immunotherapy, particularly OIT, is gaining considerable interest, and substantial effort has been made to integrate this active treatment into clinical practice. Consequently, growing evidence has been obtained regarding the efficacy and safety of OIT, particularly for allergens such as peanuts, eggs, and milk. However, several issues need to be addressed regarding the availability, safety, and long-term effects of this intervention. In this review, we summarize currently available information regarding tolerance-inducing immune mechanisms of OIT, data on efficacy and safety, gaps in current evidence, and ongoing research to develop new therapeutic molecules in order to enhance safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pınar Gökmirza Özdemir
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Sakura Sato
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Yanagida
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang S, Kattan JD, Baker MG, Oriel RC, Tsuang AJ, Sicherer SH, Schaible AM, Groetch ME, Cox AL. Successful baked egg and baked milk oral immunotherapy in a pediatric cohort. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:661-663.e3. [PMID: 36368441 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shouling Zhang
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Jacob D Kattan
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Mary Grace Baker
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Roxanne C Oriel
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Angela J Tsuang
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Scott H Sicherer
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Allison M Schaible
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Marion E Groetch
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Amanda L Cox
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cafarotti A, Giovannini M, Begìn P, Brough HA, Arasi S. Management of IgE-mediated food allergy in the 21st century. Clin Exp Allergy 2023; 53:25-38. [PMID: 36200952 PMCID: PMC10092460 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The 21st century has seen the propulsion of research in the field of food allergy, which has driven real changes in the clinical approach. Allergen immunotherapy has been recommended for the active management of food allergy. Data have shown promising additional methods of treatment, including biologics. Efforts have been devoted to the risk stratification of food allergy and the standardization of the assessment of food-allergic severity. Alternative routes of administration of epinephrine are under investigation to minimize any mechanical issue and the fear of injections. Evidence-based guidelines have been published by the main international societies in the field of anaphylaxis and food allergy management and new updates are in preparation. In the coming years, treatment options that are currently in pre-clinical or early clinical evaluation will hopefully lead to safe and effective disease-modifying therapies for food allergy in clinical practice. The identification of reliable biomarkers and the standardization of definitions and measurement approaches, alongside a shared decision-making with patients and families, will be key for the development of personalized care and to help minimize the substantial burden of food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arianna Cafarotti
- Allergy Unit - Area of Translational Research in Pediatric Specialities, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Philippe Begìn
- Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology Division, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Allergy and Clinical Immunology Division, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Helen A Brough
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Hospital, London, UK.,Paediatric Allergy Group, Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Allergy Unit - Area of Translational Research in Pediatric Specialities, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Avoiding avoidance in milk and egg allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2022; 129:657-658. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
|
22
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To highlight the current evidence on food desensitization in children with food allergy. RECENT FINDINGS Food Allergen Specific Immunotherapy (FA-AIT) is currently recognised as a treatment option for treating children with allergy at least to the main common foods (i.e. milk, egg and peanut). The oral route of administration has been proven to be the most effective in achieving desensitisation. Efforts are devoted to overcome the current unmet needs mainly related to safety issues and long-term efficacy, as well as adherence to the treatment and improvement of health-related quality of life. In this perspective, alternative routes of administration and adjunctive treatments are under investigation. SUMMARY The future of food allergy management is a personalised approach based on a shared decision-making that takes into account the needs of patients and families. Health professionals will be able to offer multiple treatment options, including FA-AIT with adjunctive or alternative therapies. Thus, patients should be correctly identified, using validated predictive factors, in order to select appropriate candidates for these therapies.
Collapse
|
23
|
Agache I, Zemelka-Wiącek M, Shamji MH, Jutel M. Immunotherapy: State-of-the-art review of therapies and theratypes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 150:1279-1288. [PMID: 36328808 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Revised: 10/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Through its disease-modifying potential, immunotherapy is the keystone to curing allergic diseases. Allergen immunotherapy, applied for more than a century, is currently supported by novel modalities such as mAb-based therapies or small molecules targeting the key nodes of the allergic inflammation network. In this review, a summary of the most significant advances in immunotherapy is presented, addressing not only novel approaches to stratifying patients but also major controlled clinical trials and real-world evidence that strengthen the role of immunotherapy in the treatment of allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, Romania.
| | | | - Mohamed H Shamji
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland; ALL-MED Medical Research Institute, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) guideline update - XIII - Oral immunotherapy for CMA - Systematic review. World Allergy Organ J 2022; 15:100682. [PMID: 36185550 PMCID: PMC9474924 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2022.100682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Allergy to cow's milk is the most common food allergy in infants and it is usually outgrown by 5 years of age. In some individuals it persists beyond early childhood. Oral immunotherapy (OIT, oral desensitization, specific oral tolerance induction) has been proposed as a promising therapeutic strategy for persistent IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy. We previously published the systematic review of OIT for cow's milk allergy (CMA) in 2010 as part of the World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines. Objective To systematically synthesize the currently available evidence about OIT for IgE-mediated CMA and to inform the updated 2022 WAO guidelines. Methods We searched the electronic databases including PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the websites of selected allergy organizations. We included all studies irrespective of the language of the original publication. The last search was conducted in February 2021. We registered the protocol on Open Science Framework (10.17605/OSF.IO/AH2DT). Results We identified 2147 unique records published between 2010 and 2021, including 13 randomized trials and 109 observational studies addressing cow's milk OIT. We found low-certainty evidence that OIT with unheated cow's milk, compared to elimination diet alone, increased the likelihood of being able to consume ≥150 ml of cow's milk in controlled settings (risk ratio (RR): 12.3, 95% CI: 5.9 to 26.0; risk difference (RD): 25 more per 100, 95% CI 11 to 56) as well as accidently ingest a small amount (≥5 ml) of cow's milk (RR: 8.7, 95% CI: 4.7 to 16.1; RD: 25 more per 100, 95% CI 12 to 50). However, 2–8 weeks after discontinuation of a successful OIT, tolerance of cow's milk persisted in only 36% (range: 20%–91%) of patients. OIT increased the frequency of anaphylaxis (rate ratio: 60.0, 95% CI 15 to 244; rate difference 5 more anaphylactic reactions per 1 person per year, 95% CI: 4 to 6; moderate evidence) and the frequency of epinephrine use (rate ratio: 35.2, 95% CI: 9 to 136.5; rate difference 268 more events per 100 person-years, 95% CI: 203 to 333; high certainty). OIT also increased the risk of gastrointestinal symptoms (RR 6.9, 95% CI 1.6–30.9; RD 28 more per 100, CI 3 to 100) and respiratory symptoms (RR 49.0, 95% CI 3.12–770.6; RD 77 more per 100, CI 62 to 92), compared with avoidance diet alone. Single-arm observational studies showed that on average 6.9% of OIT patients (95% CI: 3.8%–10%) developed eosinophilic esophagitis (very low certainty evidence). We found 1 trial and 2 small case series of OIT with baked milk. Conclusions Moderate certainty evidence shows that OIT with unheated cow's milk in patients with IgE-mediated CMA is associated with an increased probability of being able to drink milk and, at the same time, an increased risk of serious adverse effects.
Collapse
|