Awareness, diagnosis and treatment of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) - Results of a US national survey

Primary care clinician engagement in implementing a machine-learning algorithm for targeted screening of familial hypercholesterolemia

Objective

To assess the impact of a multi-pronged educational approach on the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) management at a large academic medical center with the aim of empowering primary care clinicians (PCC) to diagnose and treat FH.

Methods

A comprehensive educational program for PCCs on FH management was developed and piloted from July 2022 to March 2024. Components of our intervention included: 1. Implementation of a novel clinical decision support tool in the electronic medical record for FH management, 2. Development and dissemination of an interactive educational website focused on FH and its management, 3. Delivery of virtual instructional sessions to increase awareness of the tool, provide education on its use, and obtain support from institutional leadership, and 4. Direct outreach to a pilot subset of PCCs whose patients had been detected using the validated FIND FH® machine learning algorithm. Participating clinicians were surveyed at baseline before the intervention and after the educational session.

Results

70 PCC consented to participate in the study with a survey completion rate of 79 % (n = 55) and 42 % (n = 23) for the baseline and follow-up surveys, respectively. Objective PCC knowledge scores improved from 40 to 65 % of responders correctly responding to at least 2/3rds of survey questions. Despite the fact that 87 % identified PCC's as most effective for early detection of FH, 100 % of PCCs who received direct outreach chose to defer care to an outpatient cardiologist over pursuing workup in the primary care setting.

Conclusion

Empowering PCCs in management of FH serves as a key strategy in addressing this underdiagnosed and undertreated potentially life-threatening condition. A systems-based approach to addressing these aims may include leveraging EMR-based clinical decision support models and cross-disciplinary educational partnerships with medical specialists.

Overcoming the real and imagined barriers to cholesterol screening in pediatrics

Recent guidance by the United States Preventive Services Task Force has renewed the debate surrounding the benefits of pediatric lipid screening. This commentary reviews the evolution of the pediatric lipid screening recommendations in the United States, followed by an exploration of real and imagined challenges that prevent optimal cholesterol screening rates in children. Real challenges substantively prevent the uptake of these guidelines into practice; imagined challenges, such as identifying the best age to screen, are often context-dependent and can also be surmounted. Experiences from other countries identify potential facilitators to improving screening and additional barriers. Implementation science provides guidance on overcoming the real barriers, translating evidence-based recommendations into clinical practice, and informing the next wave of solutions to overcome these challenges.

Screening and clinical characteristics analysis of familial hypercholesterolemia in a tertiary public hospital

Background and aims

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is becoming a global burden. However, it remains underdiagnosed and undertreated worldwide. This study aimed to observe the screening rate of FH patients and department distribution among hospitalized patients using different diagnostic criteria.

Methods

A total of 45,410 inpatients with LDL-C ≥3.5 mmol/L between 2008 and 2019 were included from The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University. Inpatients are diagnosed and divided into groups by Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria, Chinese-modified DLCN criteria and Chinese expert consensus (CEC) criteria.

Results

There were 172, 1,076 and 115 inpatients included in the DLCN group, Chinese-modified DLCN group and CEC group, respectively (screening rates: 0.38%, 2.37% and 0.25%). These FH patients had a very high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (55.7%-74.4%), especially in the DLCN group and CEC group (70.4%-74.4%). More than half of the patients were in the Department of Cardiology, and other high-risk departments included Neurology, Nephrology, Vascular Surgery, Otolaryngology & Head Neck Surgery and Traditional Chinese Medicine (24.35%-31.51%). Overall, hypertension, coronary heart disease, carotid arteriosclerosis, hepatic cyst, arrhythmia, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease were common accompanying diseases with FH.

Conclusions

It is necessary to establish appropriate diagnostic criteria and more positive treatment strategies for the FH inpatient population. In addition, promoting awareness of FH among doctors from other departments is also necessary. Therefore, developing a comprehensive management strategy for FH disease is very important.

Designing implementation strategies to improve identification, cascade testing, and management of families with familial hypercholesterolemia: An intervention mapping approach

Introduction

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common inherited cholesterol disorder that, without early intervention, leads to premature cardiovascular disease. Multilevel strategies that target all components of FH care including identification, cascade testing, and management are needed to address gaps that exist in FH care. We utilized intervention mapping, a systematic implementation science approach, to identify and match strategies to existing barriers and develop programs to improve FH care.

Methods

Data were collected utilizing two methods: a scoping review of published literature, related to any component of FH care, and a parallel mixed method study using interviews and surveys. The scientific literature was searched using key words including "barriers" or "facilitators" and "familial hypercholesterolemia" from inception to December 1, 2021. The parallel mixed method study recruited individuals and families with FH to participate in either dyadic interviews (N = 11 dyads/22 individuals) or online surveys (N = 98 respondents). Data generated from the scoping review, dyadic interviews, and online surveys were used in the 6-step intervention mapping process. Steps 1-3 included a needs assessment, development of program outcomes and creation of evidence-based implementation strategies. Steps 4-6 included program development, implementation, and evaluation of implementation strategies.

Results

In steps 1-3, a needs assessment found barriers to FH care included underdiagnosis of the condition which led to suboptimal management due to a myriad of determinants including knowledge gaps, negative attitudes, and risk misperceptions by individuals with FH and clinicians. Literature review highlighted barriers to FH care at the health system level, notably the relative lack of genetic testing resources and infrastructure needed to support FH diagnosis and treatment. Examples of strategies to overcome identified barriers included development of multidisciplinary care teams and educational programs. In steps 4-6, an NHLBI-funded study, the Collaborative Approach to Reach Everyone with FH (CARE-FH), deployed strategies that focused on improving identification of FH in primary care settings. The CARE-FH study is used as an example to describe program development, implementation, and evaluation techniques of implementation strategies.

Conclusion

The development and deployment of evidence-based implementation strategies that address barriers to FH care are important next steps to improve identification, cascade testing, and management.

Genetic Testing for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Genetic testing has proven utility in identifying and diagnosing individuals with FH. Here we outline the current landscape of genetic testing for FH, recommendations for testing practices and the efforts underway to improve access, availability, and uptake.

RECENT FINDINGS

Alternatives to the traditional genetic testing and counseling paradigm for FH are being explored including expanding screening programs, testing in primary care and/or cardiology clinics, leveraging electronic communication tools like chatbots, and implementing direct contact approaches to facilitate genetic testing of both probands and at-risk relatives. There is no consensus on if, when, and how genetic testing or accompanying genetic counseling should be provided for FH, though traditional genetic counseling and/or testing in specialty lipid clinics is often recommended in expert statements and professional guidelines. More evidence is needed to determine whether alternative approaches to the implementation of genetic testing for FH may be more effective.

Screening and Management of Dyslipidemia in Children and Adolescents

This review provides an overview of pediatric dyslipidemia emphasizing screening and treatment recommendations. The presence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease in childhood poses significant risk for the development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular events in adulthood. While atherogenic dyslipidemia is the most common dyslipidemia seen in children and can be suspected based on the presence of risk factors (such as obesity), familial hypercholesterolemia can be found in children with no risk factors. As such, universal cholesterol screening is recommended to identify children with these disorders in order to initiate treatment and reduce the risk of future cardiovascular disease. Treatment of pediatric dyslipidemia begins with lifestyle modifications, but primary genetic dyslipidemias may require medications such as statins. As pediatric lipid disorders often have genetic or familial components, it is important that all physicians are aware that cardiovascular risk begins in childhood, and can both identify these disorders in pediatric patients and counsel their adult patients with dyslipidemia to have their children screened.