ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Staging and Follow-Up of Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer staging and follow-up: updated guidelines from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology female pelvic imaging working group

OBJECTIVE

To provide up-to-date European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines for staging and follow-up of patients with ovarian cancer (OC).

METHODS

Twenty-one experts, members of the female pelvis imaging ESUR subcommittee from 19 institutions, replied to 2 rounds of questionnaires regarding imaging techniques and structured reporting used for pre-treatment evaluation of OC patients. The results of the survey were presented to the other authors during the group's annual meeting. The lexicon was aligned with the Society of American Radiology (SAR)-ESUR lexicon; a first draft was circulated, and then comments and suggestions from the other authors were incorporated.

RESULTS

Evaluation of disease extent at diagnosis should be performed by chest, abdominal, and pelvic CT. The radiological report should map the disease with specific mention of sites that may preclude optimal cytoreductive surgery. For suspected recurrence, CT and [18F]FDG PET-CT are both valid options. MRI can be considered in experienced centres, as an alternative to CT, considering the high costs and the need for higher expertise in reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

CT is the imaging modality of choice for preoperative evaluation and follow-up in OC patients. A structured radiological report, including specific mention of sites that may preclude optimal debulking, is of value for patient management.

KEY POINTS

Question Guidelines were last published for ovarian cancer (OC) imaging in 2010; here, guidance on imaging techniques and reporting, incorporating advances in the field, are provided. Findings Structured reports should map out sites of disease, highlighting sites that limit cytoreduction. For suspected recurrence, CT and 18FDG PET-CT are options, and MRI can be considered. Clinical relevance Imaging evaluation of OC patients at initial diagnosis (mainly based on CT), using a structured report that considers surgical needs is valuable in treatment selection and planning.

Updates on Imaging of Common Urogenital Neoplasms

Urogenital neoplasms represent some of the most common malignancies [...].

ESR Essentials: characterisation and staging of adnexal masses with MRI and CT-practice recommendations by ESUR

Ovarian masses encompass various conditions, from benign to highly malignant, and imaging plays a vital role in their diagnosis and management. Ultrasound, particularly transvaginal ultrasound, is the foremost diagnostic method for adnexal masses. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is advised for more precise characterisation if ultrasound results are inconclusive. The ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system (O-RADS) MRI lexicon and scoring system provides a standardised method for describing, assessing, and categorising the risk of each ovarian mass. Determining a histological differential diagnosis of the mass may influence treatment decision-making and treatment planning. When ultrasound or MRI suggests the possibility of cancer, computed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging technique for staging. It is essential to outline the extent of the malignancy, guide treatment decisions, and evaluate the feasibility of cytoreductive surgery. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the key imaging processes in evaluating and managing ovarian masses, from initial diagnosis to initial treatment. It also includes pertinent recommendations for properly performing and interpreting various imaging modalities. KEY POINTS: MRI is the modality of choice for indeterminate ovarian masses at ultrasound, and the O-RADS MRI lexicon and score enable unequivocal communication with clinicians. CT is the recommended modality for suspected ovarian masses to tailor treatment and surgery. Multidisciplinary meetings integrate information and help decide the most appropriate treatment for each patient.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms: 2023 Update

Asymptomatic adnexal masses are commonly encountered in daily radiology practice. Although the vast majority of these masses are benign, a small subset have a risk of malignancy, which require gynecologic oncology referral for best treatment outcomes. Ultrasound, using a combination of both transabdominal, transvaginal, and duplex Doppler technique can accurately characterize the majority of these lesions. MRI with and without contrast is a useful complementary modality that can help characterize indeterminate lesions and assess the risk of malignancy is those that are suspicious. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Imaging of Peritoneal Metastases in Ovarian Cancer Using MDCT, MRI, and FDG PET/CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

This review aims to compare the diagnostic performance of multidetector CT (MDCT), MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, and FDG PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal metastases (PMs) in ovarian cancer (OC). A comprehensive search was performed for articles published from 2000 to February 2023. The inclusion criteria were the following: diagnosis/suspicion of PMs in patients with ovarian/fallopian/primary peritoneal cancer; initial staging or suspicion of recurrence; MDCT, MRI and/or FDG PET/CT performed for the detection of PMs; population of at least 10 patients; surgical results, histopathologic analysis, and/or radiologic follow-up, used as reference standard; and per-patient and per-region data and data for calculating sensitivity and specificity reported. In total, 33 studies were assessed, including 487 women with OC and PMs. On a per-patient basis, MRI (p = 0.03) and FDG PET/CT (p < 0.01) had higher sensitivity compared to MDCT. MRI and PET/CT had comparable sensitivities (p = 0.84). On a per-lesion analysis, no differences in sensitivity estimates were noted between MDCT and MRI (p = 0.25), MDCT and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.68), and MRI and FDG PET/CT (p = 0.35). Based on our results, FDG PET/CT and MRI are the preferred imaging modalities for the detection of PMs in OC. However, the value of FDG PET/CT and MRI compared to MDCT needs to be determined. Future research to address the limitations of the existing studies and the need for standardization and to explore the cost-effectiveness of the three imaging modalities is required.

Contrast-enhanced CT radiomics for preoperative prediction of stage in epithelial ovarian cancer: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Preoperative prediction of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is crucial for determining appropriate treatment strategy. This study aimed to explore the value of contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) radiomics in predicting preoperative FIGO staging of EOC, and to validate the stability of the model through an independent external dataset.

METHODS

A total of 201 EOC patients from three centers, divided into a training cohort (n = 106), internal (n = 46) and external (n = 49) validation cohorts. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression algorithm was used for screening radiomics features. Five machine learning algorithms, namely logistic regression, support vector machine, random forest, light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), and decision tree, were utilized in developing the radiomics model. The optimal performing algorithm was selected to establish the radiomics model, clinical model, and the combined model. The diagnostic performances of the models were evaluated through receiver operating characteristic analysis, and the comparison of the area under curves (AUCs) were conducted using the Delong test or F-test.

RESULTS

Seven optimal radiomics features were retained by the LASSO algorithm. The five radiomics models demonstrate that the LightGBM model exhibits notable prediction efficiency and robustness, as evidenced by AUCs of 0.83 in the training cohort, 0.80 in the internal validation cohort, and 0.68 in the external validation cohort. The multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that carcinoma antigen 125 and tumor location were identified as independent predictors for the FIGO staging of EOC. The combined model exhibited best diagnostic efficiency, with AUCs of 0.95 in the training cohort, 0.83 in the internal validation cohort, and 0.79 in the external validation cohort. The F-test indicated that the combined model exhibited a significantly superior AUC value compared to the radiomics model in the training cohort (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined model integrating clinical characteristics and radiomics features shows potential as a non-invasive adjunctive diagnostic modality for preoperative evaluation of the FIGO staging status of EOC, thereby facilitating clinical decision-making and enhancing patient outcomes.

Development and validation of an ultrasound‑based radiomics nomogram to predict lymph node status in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in medical imaging technology, the accurate preoperative prediction of lymph node status remains challenging in ovarian cancer. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using ultrasound-based radiomics combined with preoperative clinical characteristics to predict lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).

RESULTS

Patients with 401 HGSOC lesions from two institutions were enrolled: institution 1 for the training cohort (n = 322) and institution 2 for the external test cohort (n = 79). Radiomics features were extracted from the three preoperative ultrasound images of each lesion. During feature selection, primary screening was first performed using the sample variance F-value, followed by recursive feature elimination (RFE) to filter out the 12 most significant features for predicting LNM. The radscore derived from these 12 radiomic features and three clinical characteristics were used to construct a combined model and nomogram to predict LNM, and subsequent 10-fold cross-validation was performed. In the test phase, the three models were tested with external test cohort. The radiomics model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.899 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.864-0.933) in the training cohort and 0.855 (95%CI: 0.774-0.935) in the test cohort. The combined model showed good calibration and discrimination in the training cohort (AUC = 0.930) and test cohort (AUC = 0.881), which were superior to those of the radiomic and clinical models alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram consisting of the radscore and preoperative clinical characteristics showed good diagnostic performance in predicting LNM in patients with HGSOC. It may be used as a noninvasive method for assessing the lymph node status in these patients.

Imaging of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: CT, MRI, Radiomic Features and Resectability Criteria

PC represents the most striking picture of the loco-regional spread of ovarian cancer, configuring stage III. In the last few years, many papers have evaluated the role of imaging and therapeutic management in patients with ovarian cancer and PC. This paper summed up the literature on traditional approaches to the imaging of peritoneal carcinomatosis in advanced ovarian cancer, presenting classification systems, most frequent patterns, routes of spread and sites that are difficult to identify. The role of imaging in diagnosis was investigated, with particular attention to the reported sensitivity and specificity data-computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT)-and to the peritoneal cancer index (PCI). In addition, we explored the therapeutic possibilities and radiomics applications that can impact management of patients with ovarian cancer. Careful staging is mandatory, and patient selection is one of the most important factors influencing complete cytoreduction (CCR) outcome: an accurate pre-operative imaging may allow selection of patients that may benefit most from primary cytoreductive surgery.

Application of medical imaging in ovarian cancer: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2022

Background

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal tumor within the female reproductive system. Medical imaging plays a significant role in diagnosis and monitoring OC. This study aims to use bibliometric analysis to explore the current research hotspots and collaborative networks in the application of medical imaging in OC from 2000 to 2022.

Methods

A systematica search for medical imaging in OC was conducted on the Web of Science Core Collection on August 9, 2023. All reviews and articles published from January 2000 to December 2022 were downloaded, and an analysis of countries, institutions, journals, keywords, and collaborative networks was perfomed using CiteSpace and VOSviewer.

Results

A total of 5,958 publications were obtained, demonstrating a clear upward trend in annual publications over the study peroid. The USA led in productivity with 1,373 publications, and Harvard University emerged as the most prominent institution with 202 publications. Timmerman D was the most prolific contributor with 100 publications, and Gynecological Oncology led in the number of publications with 296. The top three keywords were "ovarian cancer" (1,256), "ultrasound" (725), and "diagnosis" (712). In addition, "pelvic masses" had the highest burst strength (25.5), followed by "magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)" (21.47). Recent emergent keywords such as "apoptosis", "nanoparticles", "features", "accuracy", and "human epididymal protein 4 (HE 4)" reflect research trends in this field and may become research hotspots in the future.

Conclusion

This study provides a comprehensive summary of the key contributions of OC imaging to field's development over the past 23 years. Presently, primary areas of OC imaging research include MRI, targeted therapy of OC, novel biomarker (HE 4), and artificial intelligence. These areas are expected to influence future research endeavors in this field.

MR Imaging of Gynecologic Tumors: Pearls, Pitfalls, and Tumor Mimics

MR imaging is the modality of choice for the pre-treatment evaluation of patients with gynecologic malignancies, given its excellent soft tissue contrast and multi-planar capability. However, it is not without pitfalls. Challenges can be encountered in the assessment of the infiltration of myometrium, vagina, cervical stroma, and parametria, which are crucial prognostic factors for endometrial and cervical cancers. Other challenges can be encountered in the distinction between solid and non-solid tissue and in the identification of peritoneal carcinomatosis for the sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass.

Seeing beyond the tumor: computed tomography image-based radiomic analysis helps identify ovarian clear cell carcinoma subtype in epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a model that can preoperatively identify the ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) subtype in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) using CT imaging radiomics and clinical data.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 282 patients with EOC (training set = 225, testing set = 57) who underwent pre-surgery CT examinations. Patients were categorized into OCCC or other EOC subtypes based on postoperative pathology. Seven clinical characteristics (age, cancer antigen [CA]-125, CA-199, endometriosis, venous thromboembolism, hypercalcemia, stage) were collected. Primary tumors were manually delineated on portal venous-phase images, and 1218 radiomic features were extracted. The F-test-based feature selection method and logistic regression algorithm were used to build the radiomic signature, clinical model, and integrated model. To explore the effects of integrated model-assisted diagnosis, five radiologists independently interpreted images in the testing set and reevaluated cases two weeks later with knowledge of the integrated model's output. The diagnostic performances of the predictive models, radiologists, and radiologists aided by the integrated model were evaluated.

RESULTS

The integrated model containing the radiomic signature (constructed by four wavelet radiomic features) and three clinical characteristics (CA-125, endometriosis, and hypercalcinemia), showed better diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.863 [0.762-0.964]) than the clinical model (AUC = 0.792 [0.630-0.953], p = 0.295) and the radiomic signature alone (AUC = 0.781 [0.636-0.926], p = 0.185). The diagnostic sensitivities of the radiologists were significantly improved when using the integrated model (p = 0.023-0.041), while the specificities and accuracies were maintained (p = 0.074-1.000).

CONCLUSION

Our integrated model shows great potential to facilitate the early identification of the OCCC subtype in EOC, which may enhance subtype-specific therapy and clinical management.

How Do Cancer-Specific Computed Tomography Protocols Compare With the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry? An Analysis of Computed Tomography Dose at 2 Cancer Centers

BACKGROUND

Little guidance exists on how to stratify radiation dose according to diagnostic task. Changing dose for different cancer types is currently not informed by the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry dose survey.

METHODS

A total of 9602 patient examinations were pulled from 2 National Cancer Institute designated cancer centers. Computed tomography dose (CTDI vol ) was extracted, and patient water equivalent diameter was calculated. N-way analysis of variance was used to compare the dose levels between 2 protocols used at site 1, and three protocols used at site 2.

RESULTS

Sites 1 and 2 both independently stratified their doses according to cancer indications in similar ways. For example, both sites used lower doses ( P < 0.001) for follow-up of testicular cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma. Median dose at median patient size from lowest to highest dose level for site 1 were 17.9 (17.7-18.0) mGy (mean [95% confidence interval]) and 26.8 (26.2-27.4) mGy. For site 2, they were 12.1 (10.6-13.7) mGy, 25.5 (25.2-25.7) mGy, and 34.2 (33.8-34.5) mGy. Both sites had higher doses ( P < 0.001) between their routine and high-image-quality protocols, with an increase of 48% between these doses for site 1 and 25% for site 2. High-image-quality protocols were largely applied for detection of low-contrast liver lesions or subtle pelvic pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that 2 cancer centers independently choose to stratify their cancer doses in similar ways. Sites 1 and 2 dose data were higher than the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry dose survey data. We thus propose including a cancer-specific subset for the dose registry.

Manifestations of Ovarian Cancer in Relation to Other Pelvic Diseases by MRI

Imaging plays a pivotal role in the diagnostic approach of women with suspected ovarian cancer. MRI is widely used for preoperative characterization and risk stratification of adnexal masses. While epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has typical findings on MRI; there are several benign and malignant pelvic conditions that may mimic its appearance on imaging. Knowledge of the origin and imaging characteristics of a pelvic mass will help radiologists diagnose ovarian cancer promptly and accurately. Finally, in special subgroups, including adolescents and gravid population, the prevalence of various ovarian tumors differs from that of the general population and there are conditions which uniquely manifest during these periods of life.

Prediction of Surgical Outcome in Advanced Ovarian Cancer by Imaging and Laparoscopy: A Narrative Review

Maximal-effort upfront or interval debulking surgery is the recommended approach for advanced-stage ovarian cancer. The role of diagnostic imaging is to provide a systematic and structured report on tumour dissemination with emphasis on key sites for resectability. Imaging methods, such as pelvic and abdominal ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography, yield high diagnostic performance for diagnosing bulky disease, but they are less accurate for depicting small-volume carcinomatosis, which may lead to unnecessary explorative laparotomies. Diagnostic laparoscopy, on the other hand, may directly visualize intraperitoneal involvement but has limitations in detecting tumours beyond the gastrosplenic ligament, in the lesser sac, mesenteric root or in the retroperitoneum. Laparoscopy has its place in combination with imaging in cases where ima-ging results regarding resectability are unclear. Different imaging models predicting tumour resectability have been developed as an adjunctional objective tool. Incorporating results from tumour quantitative analyses (e.g., radiomics), preoperative biopsies and biomarkers into predictive models may allow for more precise selection of patients eligible for extensive surgery. This review will discuss the ability of imaging and laparoscopy to predict non-resectable disease in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Malignant Epithelial Tumors of the Ovary

Epithelial ovarian neoplasms (EON) constitute the majority of ovarian cancers. Among EON, high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) is the most common and most likely to present at an advanced stage. Radiologists should recognize the imaging features associated with HGSC, particularly at ultrasound and MR imaging. Computed tomography is used for staging and to direct care pathways. Peritoneal carcinomatosis is common and does not preclude surgical resection. Other less common malignant EON have varied appearances, but share a common correlation between the amount of vascularized solid tissue and the likelihood of malignancy.

Preoperative prediction of miliary changes in the small bowel mesentery in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer using MRI radiomics nomogram

PURPOSE

To develop and validate an MRI-based radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of miliary changes in the small bowel mesentery (MCSBM) in advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty-eight patients with pathologically proved  advanced HGSOC (training cohort: n = 91; validation cohort: n = 37) were retrospectively included. All patients were initially evaluated as MCSBM-negative by preoperative imaging modalities but were finally confirmed by surgery and histopathology (MCSBM-positive: n = 53; MCSBM-negative: n = 75). Five radiomics signatures were built based on the features from multisequence magnetic resonance images. Independent clinicoradiological factors and radiomics-fusion signature were further integrated to construct a radiomics nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves and clinical utility.

RESULTS

Radiomics signatures, ascites, and tumor size were independent predictors of MCSBM. A nomogram integrating radiomics features and clinicoradiological factors demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance with areas under the curves (AUCs) of 0.871 (95% CI 0.801-0.941) and 0.858 (95% CI 0.739-0.976) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) revealed that the nomogram had a significantly improved ability compared with the clinical model in the training cohort (NRI = 0.343, p = 0.002; IDI = 0.299, p < 0.001) and validation cohort (NRI = 0.409, p = 0.015; IDI = 0.283, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our proposed nomogram has the potential to serve as a noninvasive tool for the prediction of MCSBM, which is helpful for the individualized assessment of advanced HGSOC patients.

Imaging Recommendations for Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Cancers

Ovarian malignancy the third most common gynecological malignancy and is the leading cause of death in women. Non-specific clinical presentation delays the diagnosis, and they often present in the advanced stage of disease. No imaging modality is recommended for screening as there is no significant mortality reduction. Ultrasound (USG) is usually the initial modality in suspected ovarian mass. MRI is recommended for the characterization of indeterminate ovarian or adnexal mass on USG. CT abdomen and pelvis with oral and IV contrast is the recommended imaging modality in staging the disease, predicting the resectability and in selecting the patients who would benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Early ovarian cancers are staged by post-surgical histology and undergo upfront surgery. Advanced disease benefit by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and less morbidity by interval cytoreduction where image-guided biopsy is performed for histological diagnosis. Follow-up recommendations are based on tumor histology. CT/PET CT is recommended for diagnosing recurrence.

The Discrepancy between Preoperative Tumor Markers and Imaging Outcomes in Predicting Ovarian Malignancy

Preoperative tumor markers and imaging often differ in predicting whether an ovarian tumor is malignant. Therefore, we evaluated the correlation between the predictive values of imaging and tumor markers for diagnosing ovarian tumors, especially when there were discrepancies between the two. We enrolled 1047 patients with ovarian tumors. The predictive values and concordance rates between the preoperative risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) and imaging, including CT and MRI, were evaluated. Diagnoses of 561 CT (77.9%) and 322 MRI group (69.2%) participants were consistent with the ROMA. Among them, 96.4% of the CT (541/561) and 92.5% of the MRI (298/322) group predicted an accurate diagnosis. In contrast, 67.3% (101/150) of CT and 75.2% (100/133) of MRI cases accurately predicted the diagnosis in cases with discrepancies between ROMA and CT or MRI; a total of 32% (48/150) of the CT and 25.5% (34/133) of the MRI group showed an accurate ROMA diagnosis in cases with discrepancies between ROMA and imaging. In the event of a discrepancy between ROMA and imaging when ovarian tumor malignancy prediction, the question is which method should take precedence. This study demonstrates that MRI has the greatest diagnostic accuracy, followed by CT and ROMA. It is also important to understand underlying diseases and benign conditions and rare histopathologies of malignant tumors.

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Morphological Characteristics Evaluation for Outcome Prediction of Primary Debulking Surgery for Advanced High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Preoperative assessment of whether a successful primary debulking surgery (PDS) can be performed in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) remains a challenge. A reliable model to precisely predict resectability is highly demanded.

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) combined with morphological characteristics to predict the PDS outcome in advanced HGSOC patients.

STUDY TYPE

Prospective.

SUBJECTS

A total of 95 consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed advanced HGSOC (ranged from 39 to 77 years).

FIELDS STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

A 3.0 T, readout-segmented echo-planar DWI.

ASSESSMENT

The MRI morphological characteristics of the primary ovarian tumor, a peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) derived from DWI (DWI-PCI) and histogram analysis of the primary ovarian tumor and the largest peritoneal carcinomatosis were assessed by three radiologists. Three different models were developed to predict the resectability, including a clinicoradiologic model combing MRI morphological characteristic with ascites and CA125 level; DWI-PCI alone; and a fusion model combining the clinical-morphological information and DWI-PCI.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Multivariate logistic regression analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used. A P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven cases appeared as a definite mass, whereas 28 cases as an infiltrative mass. The morphological characteristics and DWI-PCI were independent factors for predicting the resectability, with an AUC of 0.724 and 0.824, respectively. The multivariable predictive model consisted of morphological characteristics, CA-125, and the amount of ascites, with an incremental AUC of 0.818. Combining the application of a clinicoradiologic model and DWI-PCI showed significantly higher AUC of 0.863 than the ones of each of them implemented alone, with a positive NRI and IDI.

DATA CONCLUSIONS

The combination of two clinical factors, MRI morphological characteristics and DWI-PCI provide a reliable and valuable paradigm for the noninvasive prediction of the outcome of PDS.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Ovarian cancer reporting lexicon for computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging developed by the SAR Uterine and Ovarian Cancer Disease-Focused Panel and the ESUR Female Pelvic Imaging Working Group

OBJECTIVES

Imaging evaluation is an essential part of treatment planning for patients with ovarian cancer. Variation in the terminology used for describing ovarian cancer on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can lead to ambiguity and inconsistency in clinical radiology reports. The aim of this collaborative project between Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) Uterine and Ovarian Cancer (UOC) Disease-focused Panel (DFP) and the European Society of Uroradiology (ESUR) Female Pelvic Imaging (FPI) Working Group was to develop an ovarian cancer reporting lexicon for CT and MR imaging.

METHODS

Twenty-one members of the SAR UOC DFP and ESUR FPI working group, one radiology clinical fellow, and two gynecologic oncology surgeons formed the Ovarian Cancer Reporting Lexicon Committee. Two attending radiologist members of the committee prepared a preliminary list of imaging terms that was sent as an online survey to 173 radiologists and gynecologic oncologic physicians, of whom 67 responded to the survey. The committee reviewed these responses to create a final consensus list of lexicon terms.

RESULTS

An ovarian cancer reporting lexicon was created for CT and MR Imaging. This consensus-based lexicon has 6 major categories of terms: general, adnexal lesion-specific, peritoneal carcinomatosis-specific, lymph node-specific, metastatic disease -specific, and fluid-specific.

CONCLUSIONS

This lexicon for CT and MR imaging evaluation of ovarian cancer patients has the capacity to improve the clarity and consistency of reporting disease sites seen on imaging.

KEY POINTS

• This reporting lexicon for CT and MR imaging provides a list of consensus-based, standardized terms and definitions for reporting sites of ovarian cancer on imaging at initial diagnosis or follow-up. • Use of standardized terms and morphologic imaging descriptors can help improve interdisciplinary communication of disease extent and facilitate optimal patient management. • The radiologists should identify and communicate areas of disease, including difficult to resect or potentially unresectable disease that may limit the ability to achieve optimal resection.

Low-Grade Serous Carcinoma of the Ovary: The Current Status

Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) of the ovary is a rare histological subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. It has distinct clinical behavior and a specific molecular profile. Compared with high-grade serous carcinoma, this tumor presents at a younger age, has an indolent course, and is associated with prolonged survival. LGSC can arise de novo or originate following a serous borderline tumor (SBT). Pathological differentiation between LGSC and other ovarian carcinoma histological subtypes is fundamental. Several factors might influence the overall outcome, such as the age at diagnosis, current smoking, elevated body mass index, mutational status, hormonal receptors’ expression, and Ki-67 proliferation index. Surgery is the main treatment option in LGSC, and efforts must be maximized to achieve a microscopic residual in metastatic disease. Despite being relatively chemo-resistant, adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy remains the standard of care in LGSC. Hormonal maintenance therapy after adjuvant chemotherapy results in improved outcomes. Treatment options for disease recurrence include secondary cytoreductive surgery, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, targeted therapy, and clinical trials. Advancements in genomic studies and targeted therapies are expected to change the treatment landscape in LGSC.

Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma: a primer for radiologists

Primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) is a rare primary peritoneal tumor characterized by a unique range of clinical features and imaging findings. Though it shares many clinical, histologic, and imaging features with serous ovarian carcinoma, it remains a distinct clinical entity. Although less common than its primary ovarian counterpart, PPSC is characterized by a prognosis that is often equally poor with presentations common in late stages of disease. Key imaging modalities used in the evaluation of PPSC include ultrasound, CT, MRI, and PET/CT. For radiologists, an understanding of the pertinent imaging findings, pathologic correlations, and clinical features of PPSC is essential for arriving at the correct diagnosis and guiding the subsequent appropriate management of this complex malignancy.

Multidetector computed tomography in diagnosing peritoneal metastases in ovarian carcinoma

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) of the abdomen is currently the imaging examination of choice for the staging and follow-up of ovarian carcinoma (OC). Peritoneal metastases (PMs) represent the most common pathway for the metastatic spread of OC. MDCT scanners, due to several advantages-including increased volume coverage, reduced scanning time, acquisition of thin slices and creation of multiplanar reformations, and three-dimensional reconstructions-provide useful information regarding the early and accurate detection of PMs. Detailed mapping of peritoneal carcinomatosis is feasible, with improved detection of sub-centimeter peritoneal implants and thorough evaluation of curved peritoneal surfaces.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Plexopathy: 2021 Update

Plexopathy may be caused by diverse pathologies, including trauma, nerve entrapment, neoplasm, inflammation, infection, autoimmune disease, hereditary disease, and idiopathic etiologies. For patients presenting with brachial or lumbosacral plexopathy, dedicated plexus MRI is the most appropriate initial imaging modality for all clinical scenarios and can identify processes both intrinsic and extrinsic to the nerves. Other imaging tests may be appropriate for initial imaging depending on the clinical scenario. This document addresses initial imaging strategies for brachial and lumbosacral plexopathy in the following clinical situations: nontraumatic plexopathy with no known malignancy, traumatic plexopathy (not perinatal), and plexopathy occurring in the context of a known malignancy or posttreatment syndrome. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Past, Present, and Future of Serum Tumor Markers in Management of Ovarian Cancer: A Guide for the Radiologist

The ability to accurately detect early ovarian cancer and subsequently monitor treatment response is essential to improving survival for patients with ovarian malignancies. Several serum tumor markers (STMs)-including cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA)-have been used as a noninvasive method of identifying ovarian cancer in conjunction with imaging. Although current guidelines do not recommend use of STMs as screening tools for ovarian cancer, these markers have clinical utility in both diagnosis and surveillance for women with ovarian cancer. CA-125 is the most commonly used STM; its level may be elevated in several types of ovarian cancer, including epithelial cell tumors, carcinosarcoma, teratomas, and secondary ovarian malignancies. An elevated level of CA 19-9 is associated with clear cell tumors, teratomas, and secondary malignancies. CEA is most commonly associated with mucinous ovarian cancers. Finally, HE4 is being increasingly used to identify certain subtypes of epithelial ovarian cancers, particularly serous and endometrioid tumors. Diagnosis of ovarian cancers relies on a combination of CA-125 levels and US findings, which include a large adnexal mass or high-risk features, including septa and increased vascularity. CT is preferred for staging and is used along with PET and STM monitoring for surveillance. Increasingly, MRI is being used to characterize ovarian lesions that are indeterminate at US or CT. The future of STM testing involves development of "liquid biopsies," in which plasma samples are analyzed for evidence of tumors, including circulating tumor DNA or tumor cells and tumor micro-RNA. When combined with traditional imaging techniques, liquid biopsies may lead to earlier diagnosis and improved survival. An invited commentary by Shinagare is available online. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Current update on malignant epithelial ovarian tumors

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) represents the most frequently occurring gynecological malignancy, accounting for more than 70% of ovarian cancer deaths. Preoperative imaging plays an important role in assessing the extent of disease and guides the next step in surgical decision-making and operative planning. In this article, we will review the multimodality imaging features of various subtypes of EOC. We will also discuss the role of imaging in the staging, management, and surveillance of EOC.

Diagnostic performance of PET/CT and PET/MR in the management of ovarian carcinoma-a literature review

Ovarian cancer is a challenging disease. It often presents at an advanced stage with frequent recurrence despite optimal management. Accurate staging and restaging are critical for improving treatment outcomes and determining the prognosis. Imaging is an indispensable component of ovarian cancer management. Hybrid imaging modalities, including positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are emerging as potential non-invasive imaging tools for improved management of ovarian cancer. This review article discusses the role of PET/CT and PET/MRI in ovarian cancer.

Low-grade serous epithelial ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review and update for radiologists

Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is an infrequent subtype of ovarian cancer, corresponding to 5% of epithelial neoplasms. This subtype of ovarian carcinoma characteristically has molecular features, pathogenesis, clinical behaviour, sensitivity to chemotherapy, and prognosis distinct to high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Knowing the difference between LGSC and other ovarian serous tumours is vital to guide clinical management, which currently is only possible histologically. However, imaging can provide several clues that allow differentiating LGSC from other tumours and enable precise staging and follow-up of ovarian cancer treatment. Characteristically, LGSC appears as mixed lesions with variable papillary projections and solid components, usually in different proportions from those detected in serous borderline tumour and HGSC. Calcified extracellular bodies, known as psammoma bodies, are also a common feature of LGSC, frequently detectable within lymphadenopathies and metastases associated with this type of tumour. In addition, the characterisation of magnetic resonance imaging enhancement also plays an essential role in calculating the probability of malignancy of these lesions. As such, in this review, we discuss and update the distinct radiological modalities features and the clinicopathologic characteristics of LGSC to allow radiologists to be familiarised with them and to narrow the differential diagnosis when facing this type of tumour.

Multimodality Imaging Approach to Ovarian Neoplasms with Pathologic Correlation

Ovarian neoplasms can be categorized on the basis of histopathologic features into epithelial surface cell tumors, germ cell tumors, sex cord-stromal tumors, and metastases. While their imaging appearance is often nonspecific, it closely parallels the gross pathologic appearance, and radiologic-pathologic correlation is helpful to aid in a deeper understanding of the subtypes. Epithelial cell neoplasms are the most common category, and they can be benign, borderline, or malignant. Specific subtypes include serous (most common), mucinous, seromucinous, endometrioid, clear cell, Brenner, and undifferentiated. High-grade serous cystadenocarcinoma accounts for the majority of malignant ovarian tumors and the most ovarian cancer deaths. While serous neoplasms are often unilocular and bilateral, mucinous neoplasms are larger, unilateral, and multilocular. Solid components, thickened septa, and papillary projections, particularly with vascularity, indicate borderline or malignant varieties. Endometrioid and clear cell carcinomas can arise within endometriomas. Fibrous tumors (cystadenofibroma, adenofibroma, fibroma or fibrothecoma, and Brenner tumors) demonstrate low T2-weighted signal intensity of their solid components, while teratomas contain lipid. The nonspecific imaging appearance of additional malignant ovarian germ cell tumors can be narrowed with tumor marker profiles. Sex cord-stromal tumors are often solid, and secondary signs from their hormonal secretion can be a clue to their diagnosis. The authors review the anatomy of the ovary and distal fallopian tube, the proposed origins of the histologic subtypes of tumors, the clinical features and epidemiology of ovarian neoplasms, and the applications of US, CT, and MRI in imaging ovarian neoplasms. The main focus is on the radiologic and pathologic features of the multiple ovarian neoplasm subtypes. An algorithmic approach to the diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms is presented. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2020.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Clinically Suspected Adnexal Mass, No Acute Symptoms

There are approximately 9.1 pelvic surgeries performed for every histologically confirmed adnexal malignancy in the United States, compared to 2.3 surgeries per malignancy (in oncology centers) and 5.9 surgeries per malignancy (in other centers) in Europe. An important prognostic factor in the long-term survival in patients with ovarian malignancy is the initial management by a gynecological oncologist. With high accuracy of imaging for adnexal mass characterization and consequent appropriate triage to subspecialty referral, the better use of gynecologic oncology can improve treatment outcomes. Ultrasound, including transabdominal, transvaginal, and duplex ultrasound, combined with MRI with contrast can diagnose adnexal masses as benign with specific features (ie, functional masses, dermoid, endometrioma, fibroma, pedunculated fibroid, hydrosalpinx, peritoneal inclusion cyst, Tarlov cyst), malignant, or indeterminate. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

FDG PET Hybrid Imaging

Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) using tumour-seeking radiopharmaceuticals has gained wide acceptance in oncology with many clinical applications. The hybrid imaging modality PET/CT (computed tomography) allows assessing molecular as well as morphologic information at the same time. Therefore, PET/CT represents an efficient tool for whole-body staging and re-staging within one imaging modality. In oncology, the glucose analogue 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is the most widely used PET/CT radiopharmaceutical in clinical routine. FDG PET and FDG PET/CT have been used for staging and re-staging of tumour patients in numerous studies. This chapter will discuss the use and the main indications of FDG PET/CT in oncology with special emphasis on lung cancer, lymphoma, head and neck cancer, melanoma and breast cancer (among other tumour entities). A review of the current literature is given with respect to primary diagnosis, staging and diagnosis of recurrent disease. Besides its integral role in diagnosis, staging and re-staging of disease in oncology, there is increasing evidence that FDG PET/CT can be used for therapy response assessment (possibly influencing therapeutic management and treatment planning) by evaluating tumour control, which will also be discussed in this chapter.

Management Driven Structured Reporting in Ovarian Cancer

Since majority (80%) of ovarian cancer patients present at an advanced stage, imaging performed on these patients have numerous findings. The combination of multiple findings on imaging, complexity of anatomical structures which are involved in ovarian cancer, and the need to perceive certain subtle imaging features which would impact management often makes it challenging to systematically review images of these patients. Similarly, it is difficult to effectively communicate these findings in radiology reports. Structured reporting that is geared toward clinical decision-making has been an area of recognized need. An understanding of the review areas, which aid clinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary team setting at our institution led us to the proposed structured reporting template for ovarian cancer. Through this review, the authors would like to share this reporting template with examples.

Pre-operative assessment of intra-abdominal disease spread in epithelial ovarian cancer: a comparative study between ultrasound and computed tomography

Objective

To compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) for detecting pelvic and abdominal tumor spread in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Methods

An observational cohort study of 93 patients (mean age 57.6 years) with an ultrasound diagnosis of adnexal mass suspected of malignancy and confirmed histologically as epithelial ovarian cancer was undertaken. In all cases, transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound as well as CT scans were performed to assess the extent of the disease within the pelvis and abdomen prior to surgery. The exploration was systematic, analyzing 12 anatomical areas. All patients underwent surgical staging and/or cytoreductive surgery with an initial laparoscopy for assessing resectability. The surgical and pathological findings were considered as the 'reference standard'. Sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound and CT scanning were calculated for the different anatomical areas and compared using the McNemar test. Agreement between ultrasound and CT staging and the surgical stage was estimated using the weighted kappa index.

Results

The tumorous stage was International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I in 26 cases, stage II in 11 cases, stage III in 47 cases, and stage IV in nine cases. Excluding stages I and IIA cases (n=30), R0 (no macroscopic residual disease) was achieved in 36 women (62.2%), R1 (macroscopic residual disease <1 cm) was achieved in 13 women (25.0%), and R2 (macroscopic residual disease >1 cm) debulking surgery occurred in three women (5.8%). Eleven patients (11.8%) were considered not suitable for optimal debulking surgery during laparoscopic assessment. Overall sensitivity of ultrasound and CT for detecting disease was 70.3% and 60.1%, respectively, and specificity was 97.8% and 93.7%, respectively. The agreement between radiological stage and surgical stage for ultrasound (kappa index 0.69) and CT (kappa index 0.70) was good for both techniques. Overall accuracy to determine tumor stage was 71% for ultrasound and 75% for CT.

Conclusion

Detailed ultrasound examination renders a similar diagnostic performance to CT for assessing pelvic/abdominal tumor spread in women with epithelial ovarian cancer.