1
|
Krönert MIC, Schwarzenböck SM, Kurth J, Heuschkel M, Krause BJ, Emmert S, Tietze JK. Patient-Orientated Evaluation of Treatment of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer with Rhenium-188 Compared to Surgery. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:921. [PMID: 38727478 PMCID: PMC11083370 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12090921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are responsible for up to one-third of all human malignancies. Surgery is usually the treatment of choice, but patients often experience pain during the procedure. Topical rhenium-188 resin skin cancer treatment (RSCT) may be a valid therapeutic alternative. METHODS In this monocentric pilot study, 19 patients suffering from NMSC were treated with RSCT. Most of these patients had also experienced surgery, either because they developed a new NMSC in aftercare, or they had suffered previously from NMSC. Three RSCT-treated patients, who had no exposure to surgery so far, were paired with three matched patients, who had received surgery. We sought to evaluate and compare the patients' experience with both treatments. A questionnaire assessed patients' perceptions regarding side effects, aesthetic outcomes, wound care, fear of complications, and personal treatment preferences. Patients evaluated the different parameters of their either RSCT- or surgery-treated lesions on a scale from 0-10. RESULTS Patients were more afraid of complications before surgery than before RSCT (p = 0.04). Treatment with RSCT caused significantly less pain on treatment day (mean 0.56) than surgery (mean 2.32) (0 no pain, 10 maximum pain) (p = 0.02) and 14 days after the procedure (mean 0.89 versus mean 2.47) (p = 0.02). On day 14, RSCT-treated lesions were also significantly less itchy (mean 0.34) than after surgery (mean 1.50). Most patients were very satisfied with the aesthetic outcome after both RSCT (mean 8.42) and surgery (mean 8.31) (p = 0.89). In the case of a new NMSC, the majority of patients who experienced both treatments would rather be treated primarily with RSCT (44%) or would consider both options (31%); only 19% preferred surgery. CONCLUSION Patients evaluated RSCT as less painful than surgery. The aesthetic outcomes of both treatments were comparable. For pain-sensitive patients, RSCT might be a preferable treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maila I. C. Krönert
- Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (M.I.C.K.); (S.E.)
| | - Sarah M. Schwarzenböck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.M.S.); (J.K.); (M.H.); (B.J.K.)
| | - Jens Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.M.S.); (J.K.); (M.H.); (B.J.K.)
| | - Martin Heuschkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.M.S.); (J.K.); (M.H.); (B.J.K.)
| | - Bernd J. Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (S.M.S.); (J.K.); (M.H.); (B.J.K.)
| | - Steffen Emmert
- Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (M.I.C.K.); (S.E.)
| | - Julia K. Tietze
- Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology, University Medical Center Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (M.I.C.K.); (S.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Djaïleb L, Armstrong WR, Thompson D, Gafita A, Farolfi A, Rajagopal A, Grogan TR, Nguyen K, Benz MR, Hotta M, Barbato F, Ceci F, Schwarzenböck SM, Unterrainer M, Zacho HD, Juarez R, Cooperberg M, Carroll P, Washington S, Reiter RE, Eiber M, Herrmann K, Fendler WP, Czernin J, Hope TA, Calais J. Presurgical 68Ga-PSMA-11 Positron Emission Tomography for Biochemical Recurrence Risk Assessment: A Follow-up Analysis of a Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial. Eur Urol 2023; 84:588-596. [PMID: 37482512 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the initial staging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa), prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has been established as a front-line imaging modality. The increasing number of PSMA-PET scans performed in the primary staging setting might be associated with decreases in biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival (BCR-FS). OBJECTIVE To assess the added prognostic value of presurgical PSMA-PET for BCR-FS compared with the presurgical Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) and postsurgical CAPRA-Surgery (CAPRA-S) scores in patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and pelvic lymph node dissection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This is a follow-up study of the surgical cohort evaluated in the multicenter prospective phase 3 imaging trial (n = 277; NCT03368547, NCT02611882, and NCT02919111). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Each 68Ga-PSMA-11-PET scan was read by three blinded independent readers. PSMA-PET prostate uptake (low vs high), PSMA-PET extraprostatic disease (N1/M1), and CAPRA and CAPRA-S scores were used to assess the risk of BCR. Patients were followed after RP by local investigators using electronic medical records. BCR was defined by a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level increasing to ≥0.2 ng/ml after RP or initiation of PCa-specific secondary treatment (>6 mo after surgery). Univariate and multivariable Cox models, and c-statistic index were performed to assess the prognostic value of PSMA-PET and for a comparison with the CAPRA and CAPRA-S scores. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS From December 2015 to December 2019, 277 patients underwent surgery after PSMA-PET. Clinical follow-up was obtained in 240/277 (87%) patients. The median follow-up after surgery was 32.4 (interquartile range 23.3-42.9) mo. Of 240 BCR events, 91 (38%) were observed. PSMA-PET N1/M1 was found in 41/240 (17%) patients. PSMA-PET prostate uptake, PSMA-PET N1/M1, and CAPRA and CAPRA-S scores were significant univariate predictors of BCR. The addition of PSMA-PET N1/M1 status to the presurgical CAPRA score improved the risk assessment for BCR significantly in comparison with the presurgical CAPRA score alone (c-statistic 0.70 [0.64-0.75] vs 0.63 [0.57-0.69]; p < 0.001). The C-index of the postsurgical model utilizing the postsurgical CAPRA-S score alone was not significantly different from the presurgical model combining the presurgical CAPRA score and PSMA-PET N1/M1 status (p = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS Presurgical PSMA-PET was a strong prognostic biomarker improving BCR-FS risk assessment. Its implementation in the presurgical risk assessment with the CAPRA score improved the performance and reduced the difference with the reference standard (postsurgical CAPRA-S score). PATIENT SUMMARY The use prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography improved the assessment of biochemical recurrence risk in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer who were treated with radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loïc Djaïleb
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Wesley R Armstrong
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; ULCA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Thompson
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Andrei Gafita
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Abhejit Rajagopal
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tristan R Grogan
- Department of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kathleen Nguyen
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthias R Benz
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Masatoshi Hotta
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Barbato
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Haemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Roxanna Juarez
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Samuel Washington
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert E Reiter
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tietze JK, Heuschkel M, Krönert MIC, Kurth J, Bandow G, Ojak G, Grünwald P, Herold JI, Thiem A, Dreßler M, Krause BJ, Emmert S, Schwarzenböck SM. Topical 188Re Ionizing Radiation Therapy Exerts High Efficacy in Curing Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:869-876. [PMID: 37682602 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REPORT Nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is the most frequent malignancy. Surgical intervention is the common treatment but may lead to disappointing results; alternative treatment options are needed. METHODS In this monocentric pilot study, topical 188Re resin was investigated as a treatment for invasive NMSC up to 3-mm thickness. Twenty-two patients with 40 histologically confirmed NMSCs with a median size of 1.25 cm2 (range, 0.04-16.8 cm2) and a median tumor thickness of 0.35 mm (range, 0.1-2.1 mm) were included. Patients were treated once with 188Re resin with a targeted dose of 50 Gy. The median applied activity was 111.4 MBq (range, 21.0-168.0 MBq), and the median treatment time was 89 minutes (range, 38-175 minutes). The response rate, adverse events, and cosmetic outcome were assessed at 14 days, 4 months, and 12 months. RESULTS Response rate at 12 months was 97.5%, with 95% complete responses (clinically or histologically proven in case of clinical doubt). Most adverse events were reported at 14 days, with 20% itching and 12.5% mostly minor pain. Forty-nine percent of the lesions showed hypopigmentation only at 12 months. Forty-one percent of the lesions were graded as cosmetically superior to the expected result after surgery and 51.3% as comparable to successful surgery. The cosmetic outcome on the head and face was superior compared with the trunk and leg (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION 188Re resin is a highly effective treatment for NMSC up to 3-mm thickness and a valid alternative to surgery, specifically for tumors located on sensitive areas such as nose or ear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia K Tietze
- From the Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology
| | - Martin Heuschkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Jens Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Gesine Bandow
- From the Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology
| | - Gregor Ojak
- From the Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology
| | - Pavel Grünwald
- From the Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology
| | | | - Alexander Thiem
- From the Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology
| | - Miriam Dreßler
- From the Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Steffen Emmert
- From the Clinic and Policlinic for Dermatology and Venereology
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Escudero-Castellanos A, Kurth J, Imlimthan S, Menéndez E, Pilatis E, Moon ES, Läppchen T, Rathke H, Schwarzenböck SM, Krause BJ, Rösch F, Rominger A, Gourni E. Translational assessment of a DATA-functionalized FAP inhibitor with facile 68Ga-labeling at room temperature. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:3202-3213. [PMID: 37284857 PMCID: PMC10541845 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06285-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study aims at evaluating the preclinical and the clinical performance of [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m.SA.FAPi, which has the advantage to be labeled with gallium-68 at room temperature. METHODS [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m.SA.FAPi was assessed in vitro on FAP-expressing stromal cells, followed by biodistribution and in vivo imaging on prostate and glioblastoma xenografts. Moreover, the clinical assessment of [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m.SA.FAPi was conducted on six patients with prostate cancer, aiming on investigating, biodistribution, biokinetics, and determining tumor uptake. RESULTS [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m.SA.FAPi is quantitatively prepared in an instant kit-type version at room temperature. It demonstrated high stability in human serum, affinity for FAP in the low nanomolar range, and high internalization rate when associated with CAFs. Biodistribution and PET studies in prostate and glioblastoma xenografts revealed high and specific tumor uptake. Elimination of the radiotracer mainly occurred through the urinary tract. The clinical data are in accordance with the preclinical data concerning the organ receiving the highest absorbed dose (urinary bladder wall, heart wall, spleen, and kidneys). Different to the small-animal data, uptake of [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m.SA.FAPi in tumor lesions is rapid and stable and tumor-to-organ and tumor-to-blood uptake ratios are high. CONCLUSION The radiochemical, preclinical, and clinical data obtained in this study strongly support further development of [68Ga]Ga-DATA5m.SA.FAPi as a diagnostic tool for FAP imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jens Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Surachet Imlimthan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Elena Menéndez
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eirinaios Pilatis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Euy Sung Moon
- Department of Chemistry-TRIGA site, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Tilman Läppchen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hendrik Rathke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Frank Rösch
- Department of Chemistry-TRIGA site, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Eleni Gourni
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mei R, Kessler L, Pabst KM, Weber M, Schimdkonz C, Rischpler C, Zacho HD, Hope T, Schwarzenböck SM, Allen-Auerbach M, Emmett L, Ferdinandus J, Unterrainer M, Schaarschmidt BM, Umutlu L, Farolfi A, Castellucci P, Nanni C, Telo S, Fanti S, Herrmann K, Fendler WP. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT Interobserver Agreement on Tumor Assessment: An International Multicenter Prospective Study. J Nucl Med 2023:jnumed.122.265245. [PMID: 37230530 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPIs) are promising radiotracers for cancer imaging, with emerging data in the recent years. Nonetheless, the interobserver agreement on 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT study interpretations in cancer patients remains poorly understood. Methods: 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was performed on 50 patients with various tumor entities (sarcoma [n = 10], colorectal cancer [n = 10], pancreatic adenocarcinoma [n = 10], genitourinary cancer [n = 10], and other types of cancer [n = 10]). Fifteen masked observers reviewed and interpreted the images using a standardized approach for local, local nodal, and metastatic involvement. Observers were grouped by experience as having a low (<30 prior 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT studies; n = 5), intermediate (30-300 studies; n = 5), or high level of experience (>300 studies; n = 5). Two independent readers with a high level of experience and unmasked to clinical information, histopathology, tumor markers, and follow-up imaging (CT/MRI or PET/CT) served as the standard of reference (SOR). Observer groups were compared by overall agreement (percentage of patients matching SOR) and Fleiss κ with mean and corresponding 95% CI. We defined acceptable agreement as a κ value of at least 0.6 (substantial or higher) and acceptable accuracy as at least 80%. Results: Highly experienced observers agreed substantially on all categories (primary tumor: κ = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.71-0.71; local nodal involvement: κ = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.61-0.62; distant metastasis: κ = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.75-0.75), whereas observers with intermediate experience showed substantial agreement on primary tumor (κ = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.73-0.73) and distant metastasis (κ = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.65-0.65) but moderate agreement on local nodal stages (κ = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.55-0.55). Observers with low experience had moderate agreement on all categories (primary tumor: κ = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.57-0.58; local nodal involvement: κ = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.51-0.52; distant metastasis: κ = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.53-0.54). Compared with SOR, the accuracy for readers with high, intermediate, and low experience was 85%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. In summary, only highly experienced readers showed substantial agreement and a diagnostic accuracy of at least 80% in all categories. Conclusion: The interpretation of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for cancer imaging had substantial reproducibility and accuracy among highly experienced observers only, especially for local nodal and metastatic assessments. Therefore, for accurate interpretation of different tumor entities and pitfalls, we recommend training or experience with at least 300 representative scans for future clinical readers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Mei
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lukas Kessler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Kim M Pabst
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Rischpler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Martin Allen-Auerbach
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justin Ferdinandus
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| | - Benedikt M Schaarschmidt
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Cristina Nanni
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvi Telo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kurth J, Kretzschmar J, Aladwan H, Heuschkel M, Gummesson A, Bergner C, Kundt G, Hakenberg OW, Krause BJ, Schwarzenböck SM. Evaluation of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT for therapy response assessment of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy in metastasized castration refractory prostate cancer and correlation with survival. Nucl Med Commun 2021; 42:1217-1226. [PMID: 34424870 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the use of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT in therapy response assessment (TRA) of mCRPC patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and its correlation with overall survival (OS). METHODS Thirty-nine patients were included in the study. Patient-/lesion-based early and late response assessment (ERA/LRA) was defined as PET2 (after two therapy cycles) vs. PET1 (before the first cycle) (n = 29) and end of treatment PET vs. PET1 (n = 17), respectively. PET-based response (PET parameters; modified (m) PERCIST/EORTC), biochemical response (ΔPSA; category-based) and category-based clinical response (CRA) was tested for correlation/agreement. PET-based TRA was correlated with OS. RESULTS A significant correlation/agreement was shown between PET parameters and CRA as well as biochemical response in LRA of all lesions and between mPERCIST-based and category-based PSA response assessment in LRA (bone lesion-based, P = 0.045, κ = 0.184). At ERA, OS was significantly higher in CR/PR/SD compared to progressive disease applying mPERCIST/EORTC criteria (P = 0.0024). CONCLUSION In [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617-treated mCRPC patients OS of the group of CR/PR/SD was significantly higher compared to the progressive disease group (mPERCIST/EORTC) in ERA. Therefore, [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET might serve as a complementary diagnostic tool for TRA offering prognostic value regarding OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Justus Kretzschmar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Hamzeh Aladwan
- King Hussein Medical Center, Royal Medical Services, Amman, Jordan
| | - Martin Heuschkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Anja Gummesson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Carina Bergner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Oliver W Hakenberg
- Department of Urology, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hope TA, Eiber M, Armstrong WR, Juarez R, Murthy V, Lawhn-Heath C, Behr SC, Zhang L, Barbato F, Ceci F, Farolfi A, Schwarzenböck SM, Unterrainer M, Zacho HD, Nguyen HG, Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Reiter RE, Holden S, Herrmann K, Zhu S, Fendler WP, Czernin J, Calais J. Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET for Pelvic Nodal Metastasis Detection Prior to Radical Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: A Multicenter Prospective Phase 3 Imaging Trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:1635-1642. [PMID: 34529005 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Importance The presence of pelvic nodal metastases at radical prostatectomy is associated with biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy. Objective To assess the accuracy of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) 68Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging for the detection of pelvic nodal metastases compared with histopathology at time of radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. Design, Setting, and Participants This investigator-initiated prospective multicenter single-arm open-label phase 3 imaging trial of diagnostic efficacy enrolled 764 patients with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer considered for prostatectomy at University of California, San Francisco and University of California, Los Angeles from December 2015 to December 2019. Data analysis took place from October 2018 to July 2021. Interventions Imaging scan with 3 to 7 mCi of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the sensitivity and specificity for the detection pelvic lymph nodes compared with histopathology on a per-patient basis using nodal region correlation. Each scan was read centrally by 3 blinded independent central readers, and a majority rule was used for analysis. Results A total of 764 men (median [interquartile range] age, 69 [63-73] years) underwent 1 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging scan for primary staging, and 277 of 764 (36%) subsequently underwent prostatectomy with lymph node dissection (efficacy analysis cohort). Based on pathology reports, 75 of 277 patients (27%) had pelvic nodal metastasis. Results of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET were positive in 40 of 277 (14%), 2 of 277 (1%), and 7 of 277 (3%) of patients for pelvic nodal, extrapelvic nodal, and bone metastatic disease. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for pelvic nodal metastases were 0.40 (95% CI, 0.34-0.46), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.97), 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70-0.80), and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76-0.85), respectively. Of the 764 patients, 487 (64%) did not undergo prostatectomy, of which 108 were lost to follow-up. Patients with follow-up instead underwent radiotherapy (262 of 379 [69%]), systemic therapy (82 of 379 [22%]), surveillance (16 of 379 [4%]), or other treatments (19 of 379 [5%]). Conclusions and Relevance This phase 3 diagnostic efficacy trial found that in men with intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection, the sensitivity and specificity of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET were 0.40 and 0.95, respectively. This academic collaboration is the largest known to date and formed the foundation of a New Drug Application for 68Ga-PSMA-11. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03368547, NCT02611882, and NCT02919111.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.,Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.,Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Wesley R Armstrong
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Roxanna Juarez
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Vishnu Murthy
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Courtney Lawhn-Heath
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Spencer C Behr
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Li Zhang
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Francesco Barbato
- Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Helle D Zacho
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Hao G Nguyen
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Peter R Carroll
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco.,Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Robert E Reiter
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Stuart Holden
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Shaojun Zhu
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.,Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles.,Institute of Urologic Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles.,Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kurth J, Heuschkel M, Tonn A, Schildt A, Hakenberg OW, Krause BJ, Schwarzenböck SM. Streamlined Schemes for Dosimetry of 177Lu-Labeled PSMA Targeting Radioligands in Therapy of Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153884. [PMID: 34359784 PMCID: PMC8345627 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary In patients with progressive metastasized castration-resistance prostate cancer PSMA radioligand therapies have shown promising results regarding clinical safety and efficacy. Dosimetry is mandatory due to legal regulations and also required for the estimation of doses to organs at risk allowing for individual tailoring of treatment in PSMA-RLT. Due to those factors and the often poor health status of patients which restricts intense dosimetric imaging protocols, there is a clear need for simplified dosimetric approaches in mCRPC patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. In this study, we evaluated different dosimetric methodologies and found that a streamlined dosimetric approach is feasible and valid. This approach is based on single time-point imaging at 48 h p.i. in cycle 2 to 6 taking into account kinetic results of a full dosimetric scheme performed only in cycle1. These results might have a relevant impact on patients handling regarding dosimetry during [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. Abstract (Background) Aim of this retrospective analysis was to investigate in mCRPC patients treated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 whether the absorbed dose (AD) in organs at risk (OAR, i.e., kidneys and parotid glands) can be calculated using simplified methodologies with sufficient accuracy. For this calculation, results and kinetics of the first therapy cycle were used. (Methods) 46 patients treated with 2 to 6 cycles of [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 were included. As reference (current clinical standard) full dosimetry of the OAR based on quantitative imaging (whole body scintigraphy and quantitative SPECT/CT at 2, 24, 48 and 72 h p.i.) for every cycle was used. Alternatively, two dosimetry schemes, simplified in terms of image acquisition and dose calculation, were established, both assuming nearly unchanged kinetics of the radiopharmaceutical for subsequent cycles. (Results) In general, for both OAR the simplified methods provided results that were consistent with the dosimetric reference method, both per cycle and in terms of cumulative AD. Best results were obtained when imaging was performed at 48 h p.i. in each of the subsequent cycles. However, both simplified methods tended to underestimate the cumulative AD. (Conclusion) Simplified dosimetry schemes are feasible to tailor multi-cycle [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (M.H.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (B.J.K.); (S.M.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-381-494-9101
| | - Martin Heuschkel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (M.H.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (B.J.K.); (S.M.S.)
| | - Alexander Tonn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (M.H.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (B.J.K.); (S.M.S.)
| | - Anna Schildt
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (M.H.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (B.J.K.); (S.M.S.)
- Core Facility Multimodal Small Animal Imaging, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Oliver W. Hakenberg
- Department of Urology, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany;
| | - Bernd J. Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (M.H.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (B.J.K.); (S.M.S.)
| | - Sarah M. Schwarzenböck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany; (M.H.); (A.T.); (A.S.); (B.J.K.); (S.M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Molecular imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) using tumour-seeking radiopharmaceuticals has gained wide acceptance in oncology with many clinical applications. The hybrid imaging modality PET/CT (computed tomography) allows assessing molecular as well as morphologic information at the same time. Therefore, PET/CT represents an efficient tool for whole-body staging and re-staging within one imaging modality. In oncology, the glucose analogue 18-F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is the most widely used PET/CT radiopharmaceutical in clinical routine. FDG PET and FDG PET/CT have been used for staging and re-staging of tumour patients in numerous studies. This chapter will discuss the use and the main indications of FDG PET/CT in oncology with special emphasis on lung cancer, lymphoma, head and neck cancer, melanoma and breast cancer (among other tumour entities). A review of the current literature is given with respect to primary diagnosis, staging and diagnosis of recurrent disease. Besides its integral role in diagnosis, staging and re-staging of disease in oncology, there is increasing evidence that FDG PET/CT can be used for therapy response assessment (possibly influencing therapeutic management and treatment planning) by evaluating tumour control, which will also be discussed in this chapter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliane Becker
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Sarah M Schwarzenböck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medicine Rostock, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kurth J, Krause BJ, Schwarzenböck SM, Stegger L, Schäfers M, Rahbar K. External radiation exposure, excretion, and effective half-life in 177Lu-PSMA-targeted therapies. EJNMMI Res 2018; 8:32. [PMID: 29651569 PMCID: PMC5897276 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-018-0386-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2017] [Accepted: 04/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted therapy with 177Lu-PSMA-617 is a therapeutic option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To optimize the therapy procedure, it is necessary to determine relevant parameters to define radiation protection and safety necessities. Therefore, this study aimed at estimating the ambient radiation exposure received by the patient. Moreover, the excreted activity was quantified. Results In total, 50 patients with mCRPC and treated with 177Lu-PSMA-617 (mean administered activity 6.3 ± 0.5 GBq) were retrospectively included in a bi-centric study. Whole-body dose rates were measured at a distance of 2 m at various time points after application of 177Lu-PSMA-617, and effective half-lives for different time points were calculated and compared. Radiation exposure to the public was approximated using the dose integral. For the estimation of the excreted activity, whole body measurements of 25 patients were performed at 7 time points. Unbound 177Lu-PSMA-617 was rapidly cleared from the body. After 4 h, approximately 50% and, after 12 h, approximately 70% of the administered activity were excreted, primarily via urine. The mean dose rates were the following: 3.6 ± 0.7 μSv/h at 2 h p. i., 1.6 ± 0.6 μSv/h at 24 h, 1.1 ± 0.5 μSv/h at 48 h, and 0.7 ± 0.4 μSv/h at 72 h. The mean effective half-life of the cohort was 40.5 ± 9.6 h (min 21.7 h; max 85.7 h). The maximum dose to individual members of the public per treatment cycle was ~ 250 ± 55 μSv when the patient was discharged from the clinic after 48 h and ~ 190 ± 36 μSv when the patient was discharged after 72 h. Conclusions In terms of the radiation exposure to the public, 177Lu-PSMA is a safe option of radionuclide therapy. As usually four (sometimes more) cycles of the therapy are performed, it must be conducted in a way that ensures that applicable legal requirements can be followed. In other words, the radiation exposure to the public and the concentration of activity in wastewater must be sub-marginal. Therefore, in certain countries, hospitalization of these patients is mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
| | - B J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - S M Schwarzenböck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - L Stegger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - M Schäfers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - K Rahbar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dräger DL, Heuschkel M, Protzel C, Erbersdobler A, Krause BJ, Hakenberg OW, Schwarzenböck SM. [18F]FDG PET/CT for assessing inguinal lymph nodes in patients with penile cancer - correlation with histopathology after inguinal lymphadenectomy. Nuklearmedizin 2018. [PMID: 29536497 DOI: 10.3412/nukmed-0932-17-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
AIM Accurate staging of penile cancer requires invasive methods such as sentinel node biopsy or lymphadenectomy (LAD). We assessed the value of [18F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive nodal staging in penile cancer (PC) patients before inguinal LAD. PATIENTS AND METHODS 41 consecutive patients with PC (stage pT1 or higher, cN0) received [18F]FDG PET/CT before undergoing bilateral modified or radical inguinal staging LAD. Lymph nodes with a visually increased [18F]FDG uptake were classified as suspicious of lymph node metastases (LNM). Standardized uptake value (SUV) of suspicious inguinal lymph nodes was determined. Results of [18F]FDG PET/CT were correlated with histopathology. RESULTS In total 623 lymph nodes were resected, in 10 patients LNM were histologically confirmed (14/623 lymph nodes). In patient-based analysis [18F]FDG PET/CT showed a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 68 %, respectively, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 44 % and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91 %. In the groin-based analysis, [18F]FDG PET/CT had a sensitivity of 69 %, a specificity of 77 %, a PPV of 36 % and a NPV of 93 %. There was no significant difference in SUVmean and SUVmax between true positive and false positive lymph nodes (p = 0.093 and 0.069, respectively). CONCLUSION [18F]FDG PET/ CT shows a high NPV in penile cancer patients without clinically evident LNM. However, due to its limited sensitivity (especially with respect to LNM of small size) and specificity (i. e. in the differentiation between (post)inflammatory and metastatic lymph nodes) [18F]FDG PET/CT cannot replace invasive nodal staging.
Collapse
|
12
|
Beer AJ, Schwarzenböck SM, Zantl N, Souvatzoglou M, Maurer T, Watzlowik P, Kessler H, Wester HJ, Schwaiger M, Krause BJ. Non-invasive assessment of inter-and intrapatient variability of integrin expression in metastasized prostate cancer by PET. Oncotarget 2018; 7:28151-9. [PMID: 27058620 PMCID: PMC5053716 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Due to the high expression of the integrin αvβ3 not only on endothelial cells, but also on mature osteoclasts and prostate cancer cells, imaging of osseous metastases with αvβ3-targeted tracers seems promising. However, little is known about the patterns of αvβ3-expression in metastasized prostate cancer lesions in-vivo. Thus we evaluated the uptake of the αvβ3-specific PET tracer [18F]Galacto-RGD for assessment of bone metastases in prostate cancer patients. Results [18F]Galacto-RGD PET identified 58/74 bone-lesions (detection rate of 78.4%) and lymph node metastases in 2/5 patients. The SUVmean was 2.12+/−0.94 (range 0.70–4.38; tumor/blood 1.36+/−0.53; tumor/muscle 2.82+/−1.31) in bone-lesions and 2.21+/−1.18 (range 0.75–3.56) in lymph node metastases. Good visualization and detection of bone metastases was feasible due to a low background activity of the surrounding normal bone tissue. Methods 12 patients with known metastasized prostate cancer according to conventional staging (including bone-scintigraphy and contrast-enhanced CT; median PSA 68.63 ng/ml, range 3.72-1935) were examined with PET after i.v.-injection of [18F]Galacto-RGD. Two blinded nuclear-medicine physicians evaluated the PET-scans in consensus concerning lesion detectability. Volumes-of-interest were drawn in the PET-scans over all metastases defined by conventional staging (maximum of 11 lesions/patient), over the left ventricle, liver and muscle and standardized-uptake-values (SUVs) were calculated. Conclusions Our data show generally elevated uptake of [18F]Galacto-RGD in bone metastases from prostate cancer with a marked inter- and intrapatient variability. While [18F]Galacto-RGD PET is inferior to bone scintigraphy for detection of osseous metastases, it might be valuable in patient screening and monitoring of αvβ3-targeted therapies due to the high variability of αvβ3-expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ambros J Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.,Current address: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Sarah M Schwarzenböck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.,Current address: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Niko Zantl
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.,Current address: Department of Urology, Klinikum Konstanz, 78464 Konstanz, Germany
| | - Michael Souvatzoglou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.,Current address: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Petra Watzlowik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Horst Kessler
- Institute for Advanced Study (IAS) and Center of Integrated Protein Science (CIPSM), Department Chemie, Technische Universität München, 85747 Garching, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Institute for Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Markus Schwaiger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Bernd Joachim Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.,Current address: Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schwarzenböck SM, Stenzel J, Otto T, Helldorff HV, Bergner C, Kurth J, Polei S, Lindner T, Rauer R, Hohn A, Hakenberg OW, Wester HJ, Vollmar B, Krause BJ. [ 68Ga]pentixafor for CXCR4 imaging in a PC-3 prostate cancer xenograft model - comparison with [ 18F]FDG PET/CT, MRI and ex vivo receptor expression. Oncotarget 2017; 8:95606-95619. [PMID: 29221153 PMCID: PMC5707047 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim was to characterize the properties of [68Ga]Pentixafor as tracer for prostate cancer imaging in a PC-3 prostate cancer xenograft mouse model and to investigate its correlation with [18F]FDG PET/CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ex vivo analyses. Methods Static [68Ga]Pentixafor and [18F]FDG PET as well as morphological/ diffusion weighted MRI and 1H MR spectroscopy was performed. Imaging data were correlated with ex vivo biodistribution and CXCR4 expression in PC-3 tumors (immunohistochemistry (IHC), mRNA analysis). Flow cytometry was performed for evaluation of localization of CXCR4 receptors (in vitro PC-3 cell experiments). Results Tumor uptake of [68Ga]Pentixafor was significantly lower compared to [18F]FDG. Ex vivo CXCR4 mRNA expression of tumors was shown by PCR. Only faint tumor CXCR4 expression was shown by IHC (immuno reactive score of 3). Accordingly, flow cytometry of PC-3 cells revealed only a faint signal, cell membrane permeabilisation showed a slight signal increase. There was no significant correlation of [68Ga]Pentixafor tumor uptake and ex vivo receptor expression. Spectroscopy showed typical spectra of prostate cancer. Conclusion PC-3 tumor uptake of [68Ga]Pentixafor was existent but lower compared to [18F]FDG. No significant correlation of ex vivo tumor CXCR4 receptor expression and [68Ga]Pentixafor tumor uptake was shown. CXCR4 receptor expression on the surface of PC-3 cells was existent but rather low possibly explaining the limited [68Ga]Pentixafor tumor uptake; receptor localization in the interior of PC-3 cells is presumable as shown by cell membrane permeabilisation. Further studies are necessary to define the role of [68Ga]Pentixafor in prostate cancer imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Schwarzenböck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Jan Stenzel
- Core Facility Small Animal Imaging, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Thomas Otto
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Heike V Helldorff
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Carina Bergner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Jens Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Stefan Polei
- Core Facility Small Animal Imaging, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Tobias Lindner
- Core Facility Small Animal Imaging, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Romina Rauer
- Core Facility Small Animal Imaging, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Alexander Hohn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Oliver W Hakenberg
- Department of Urology, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Hans J Wester
- Institute for Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, Technische Universität München, 85748 Garching, Germany
| | - Brigitte Vollmar
- Institute for Experimental Surgery, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schmid SC, Sathe A, Guerth F, Seitz AK, Heck MM, Maurer T, Schwarzenböck SM, Krause BJ, Schulz WA, Stoehr R, Gschwend JE, Retz M, Nawroth R. Wntless promotes bladder cancer growth and acts synergistically as a molecular target in combination with cisplatin. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:544.e1-544.e10. [PMID: 28501564 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2016] [Revised: 04/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the contribution of Wnt signaling pathway to bladder cancer growth in order to identify suitable target molecules for therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Expression of Wnt 2/4/7, LRP5/6, TCF1/2/4, LEF-1, and β-actin was detected by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in a panel of 9 and for Wntless (WLS) in 17 bladder cancer cell lines. Protein expression of WLS was detected in 6 cell lines. Wnt/β-catenin activity was analyzed using the TOPflash/FOPflash luciferase reporter assay. Expression level of β-catenin, WIF1, Dickkopf proteins (DKK), HSulf-2, sFRP4, and WLS was modulated by transfecting or infecting cells transiently or stably with respective shRNAs, siRNAs, or cDNAs. For protein detection, whole cell lysates were applied to sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblots. Effects on cell growth were determined by cell viability assays and BrdU/APC incorporation/staining. For 3-dimensional tumor growth, the chicken chorioallantoic membrane model was used. Tumor growth was characterized by weight. RESULTS Expression of molecular components and activation of the Wnt signaling pathway could be detected in all cell lines. Expression level of β-catenin, WIF1, DKK, WLS, and HSulf-2 influenced Wnt activity. Expression of WLS was confirmed in 17 cell lines by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and in 6 cell lines by immunoblotting. WLS positively regulates Wnt signaling, cell proliferation, and tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. These effects could be reversed by the expression of the Wnt antagonist WIF1 and DKK. Synergistic activity of cisplatin and WLS inactivation by genetic silencing could be observed on cell viability. CONCLUSION The Wnt signaling pathway is ubiquitously activated in bladder cancer and regulates tumor growth. WLS might be a target protein for novel therapies in combination with established chemotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian C Schmid
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anuja Sathe
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ferdinand Guerth
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anna-Katharina Seitz
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias M Heck
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Wolfgang A Schulz
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Du¨sseldorf, Germany
| | - Robert Stoehr
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Margitta Retz
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Roman Nawroth
- Department of Urology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nitsch S, Hakenberg OW, Heuschkel M, Dräger D, Hildebrandt G, Krause BJ, Schwarzenböck SM. Evaluation of Prostate Cancer with 11C- and 18F-Choline PET/CT: Diagnosis and Initial Staging. J Nucl Med 2016; 57:38S-42S. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.115.169748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2016] [Accepted: 04/16/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
|
16
|
Schwarzenböck SM, Knieling A, Souvatzoglou M, Kurth J, Steiger K, Eiber M, Esposito I, Retz M, Kübler H, Gschwend JE, Schwaiger M, Krause BJ, Thalgott M. [11C]Choline PET/CT in therapy response assessment of a neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced and high risk prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy. Oncotarget 2016; 7:63747-63757. [PMID: 27572317 PMCID: PMC5325400 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent studies have shown promising results of neoadjuvant therapy in prostate cancer (PC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of [11C]Choline PET/CT in therapy response monitoring after combined neoadjuvant docetaxel chemotherapy and complete androgen blockade in locally advanced and high risk PC patients. RESULTS In [11C]Choline PET/CT there was a significant decrease of SUVmax and SUVmean (p = 0.004, each), prostate volume (p = 0.005) and PSA value (p = 0.003) after combined neoadjuvant therapy. MRI showed a significant prostate and tumor volume reduction (p = 0.003 and 0.005, respectively). Number of apoptotic cells was significantly higher in prostatectomy specimens of the therapy group compared to pretherapeutic biopsies and the control group (p = 0.02 and 0.003, respectively). METHODS 11 patients received two [11C]Choline PET/CT and MRI scans before and after combined neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. [11C]Choline uptake, prostate and tumor volume, PSA value (before/after neoadjuvant therapy) and apoptosis (of pretherapeutic biopsy/posttherapeutic prostatectomy specimens of the therapy group and prostatectomy specimens of a matched control group without neoadjuvant therapy) were assessed and tested for differences and correlation using SPSS. CONCLUSIONS The results showing a decrease in choline uptake after combined neoadjuvant therapy (paralleled by regressive and apoptotic changes in histopathology) confirm the potential of [11C]Choline PET/CT to monitor effects of neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced and high risk PC patients. Further studies are recommended to evaluate its use during the course of neoadjuvant therapy for early response assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Schwarzenböck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Anna Knieling
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Michael Souvatzoglou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | - Jens Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Katja Steiger
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Irene Esposito
- Institute of Pathology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Heinrich-Heine University of Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Margitta Retz
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich
| | - Hubert Kübler
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich
| | - Markus Schwaiger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, 18057 Rostock, Germany
| | - Mark Thalgott
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, 81675 Munich
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Schwarzenböck SM, Eiber M, Kundt G, Retz M, Sakretz M, Kurth J, Treiber U, Nawroth R, Rummeny EJ, Gschwend JE, Schwaiger M, Thalgott M, Krause BJ. Prospective evaluation of [ 11C]Choline PET/CT in therapy response assessment of standardized docetaxel first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced castration refractory prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2016; 43:2105-2113. [PMID: 27317482 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-016-3439-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the value of [11C] Choline PET/CT in monitoring early and late response to a standardized first-line docetaxel chemotherapy in castration refractory prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. METHODS Thirty-two patients were referred for [11C] Choline PET/CT before the start of docetaxel chemotherapy, after one and ten chemotherapy cycles (or - in case of discontinuation - after the last administered cycle) for therapy response assessment. [11C] Choline uptake (SUVmax, SUVmean), CT derived Houndsfield units (HUmax, HUmean), and volume of bone, lung, and nodal metastases and local recurrence were measured semi-automatically at these timepoints. Change in SUVmax, SUVmean, HUmax, HUmean, and volume was assessed between PET 2 and 1 (early response assessment, ERA) and PET 3 and 1 (late response assessment, LRA) on a patient and lesion basis. Results of PET/CT were compared to clinically used RECIST 1.1 and clinical criteria based therapy response assessment including PSA for defining progressive disease (PD) and non-progressive disease (nPD), respectively. Relationships between changes of SUVmax and SUVmean (early and late) and changes of PSAearly and PSAlate were evaluated. Prognostic value of initial SUVmax and SUVmean was assessed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. RESULTS In the patient-based ERA and LRA there were no statistically significant differences in change of choline uptake, HU, and volume between PD and nPD applying RECIST or clinical response criteria. In the lesion-based ERA, decrease in choline uptake of bone metastases was even higher in PD (applying RECIST criteria), whereas in LRA the decrease was higher in nPD (applying clinical criteria). There were only significant correlations between change in choline uptake and PSA in ERA in PD, in LRA no significant correlations were discovered. Initial SUVmax and SUVmean were statistically significantly higher in nPD (applying clinical criteria). CONCLUSION There is no significant correlation between change in choline uptake in [11C] Choline PET/CT and clinically routinely used objective response assessment during the early and late course of docetaxel chemotherapy. Therefore, [11C] Choline PET/CT seems to be of limited use in therapy response assessment in standardized first-line chemotherapy in mCRPC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Schwarzenböck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany.
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Günther Kundt
- Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Rostock University Medical Centre, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 8, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Margitta Retz
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Monique Sakretz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Jens Kurth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| | - Uwe Treiber
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Roman Nawroth
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Ernst J Rummeny
- Institute of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Schwaiger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Mark Thalgott
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre, Gertrudenplatz 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sathe A, Koshy N, Schmid SC, Thalgott M, Schwarzenböck SM, Krause BJ, Holm PS, Gschwend JE, Retz M, Nawroth R. CDK4/6 Inhibition Controls Proliferation of Bladder Cancer and Transcription of RB1. J Urol 2015; 195:771-9. [PMID: 26318986 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.08.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The retinoblastoma signaling network is frequently altered in advanced bladder cancer. We investigated the potential of CDK4/6 as a therapeutic target and determined biomarkers for patient stratification. MATERIALS AND METHODS Genetic alterations were analyzed using public databases, including TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas), COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) and CCLE (Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia). Effects of the CDK4/6-inhibitor PD-0332991 or LY2835219 were examined in 10 bladder cancer cell lines by immunoblot, cell viability, apoptosis and cell cycle progression. Efficacy of the PD-0332991 and cisplatin combination was analyzed using the combination index. Gene expression level was determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Cytomegalovirus promoter regulated recombinant retinoblastoma was used for reconstitution. Three-dimensional xenografts were grown on chicken chorioallantoic membrane and analyzed by measuring tumor weight and immunohistochemical expression of total retinoblastoma and Ki-67. RESULTS PD-0332991 treatment decreased the proliferation of retinoblastoma positive bladder cancer cell lines and was synergistic in combination with cisplatin. PD-0332991 or LY2835219 treatment decreased the phosphorylation, total protein and transcript level of retinoblastoma. Treatment resulted in a decrease in E2F target gene expression (CCNA2 and CCNE2) and cell cycle progression from G0/G1 to the S-phase but did not affect apoptosis. In retinoblastoma negative cells reconstituted with recombinant retinoblastoma PD-0332991 affected only phosphorylation and not the total retinoblastoma level. These cells remained resistant to treatment. In 3-dimensional retinoblastoma xenografts, treatment resulted in reduced tumor weight and decreased expression of total retinoblastoma and Ki-67. CONCLUSIONS We provide preclinical evidence that CDK4/6 inhibition is a potential therapeutic strategy for retinoblastoma positive bladder cancer that probably acts by negatively regulating retinoblastoma transcription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuja Sathe
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre (SMS, BJK), Rostock, Germany
| | - Nicole Koshy
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre (SMS, BJK), Rostock, Germany
| | - Sebastian C Schmid
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre (SMS, BJK), Rostock, Germany
| | - Mark Thalgott
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre (SMS, BJK), Rostock, Germany
| | - Sarah M Schwarzenböck
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre (SMS, BJK), Rostock, Germany
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre (SMS, BJK), Rostock, Germany
| | - Per S Holm
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre (SMS, BJK), Rostock, Germany
| | - Juergen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre (SMS, BJK), Rostock, Germany
| | - Margitta Retz
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre (SMS, BJK), Rostock, Germany
| | - Roman Nawroth
- Department of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rostock University Medical Centre (SMS, BJK), Rostock, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|