Long-term symptomatic and functional outcome following an intensive inpatient multidisciplinary intervention for treatment-resistant affective disorders

Who benefits from digital interventions for bipolar disorder? Stage of illness characteristics as predictors of changes in quality of life

OBJECTIVES

This study explored the potential role of stage-related variables in intervention outcomes in bipolar disorder (BD). Specifically, we aimed to identify which subgroups of individuals were most likely to experience improved quality of life following digitally delivered psychosocial interventions for BD.

METHODS

The study involved a secondary analysis of combined data from two randomised control trials (RCTs). Each trial assessed the effectiveness of digitally delivered interventions for improving quality of life, in late-stage (ORBIT RCT) or early-stage (BETTER RCT) BD. Three iterations of cluster analyses were performed, identifying subgroups of individuals based on (i) current phenomenology, (ii) course of illness and (iii) medication response. The resultant subgroups were compared with regard to changes in quality of life pre-post intervention, via repeated measures ANOVAs.

RESULTS

In each cluster analysis, two clusters were found. The current phenomenology clusters reflected two impairment levels, 'moderate impairment' and 'low impairment'. The course of illness clusters reflected 'more chronicity' and 'less chronicity' and the medication response clusters reflected 'good medication response' and 'poor medication response'. Differences in changes in quality of life over time were observed between the two current phenomenology clusters and between the medication response clusters, while the course of illness subgroups did not respond differently.

CONCLUSIONS

There are at least two distinct groups of treatment-seeking individuals with established BD, based on illness features with previously established links to different illness stages. Clusters within the current phenomenology and medication response domains demonstrated significantly different trajectories of QoL change over time in the context of our interventions, highlighting potential implications for treatment selection aligned with precision psychiatry.

Irremediability in psychiatric euthanasia: examining the objective standard

BACKGROUND

Irremediability is a key requirement for euthanasia and assisted suicide for psychiatric disorders (psychiatric EAS). Countries like the Netherlands and Belgium ask clinicians to assess irremediability in light of the patient's diagnosis and prognosis and 'according to current medical understanding'. Clarifying the relevance of a default objective standard for irremediability when applied to psychiatric EAS is crucial for solid policymaking. Yet so far, a thorough examination of this standard is lacking.

METHODS

Using treatment-resistant depression (TRD) as a test case, through a scoping review in PubMed, we analyzed the state-of-the-art evidence for whether clinicians can accurately predict individual long-term outcome and single out irremediable cases, by examining the following questions: (1) What is the definition of TRD; (2) What are group-level long-term outcomes of TRD; and (3) Can clinicians make accurate individual outcome predictions in TRD?

RESULTS

A uniform definition of TRD is lacking, with over 150 existing definitions, mostly focused on psychopharmacological research. Available yet limited studies about long-term outcomes indicate that a majority of patients with long-term TRD show significant improvement over time. Finally, evidence about individual predictions in TRD using precision medicine is growing, but methodological shortcomings and varying predictive accuracies pose important challenges for its implementation in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the claim that, as per available evidence, clinicians cannot accurately predict long-term chances of recovery in a particular patient with TRD. This means that the objective standard for irremediability cannot be met, with implications for policy and practice of psychiatric EAS.

An interdisciplinary multimodal integrative healthcare program for depressive and anxiety disorders

Objective

Although multimodal interventions are recommended in patients with severe depressive and/or anxiety disorders, available evidence is scarce. Therefore, the current study evaluates the effectiveness of an outpatient secondary care interdisciplinary multimodal integrative healthcare program, delivered within a transdiagnostic framework, for patients with (comorbid) depressive and/or anxiety disorders.

Methods

Participants were 3,900 patients diagnosed with a depressive and/or anxiety disorder. The primary outcome was Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) measured with the Research and Development-36 (RAND-36). Secondary outcomes included: (1) current psychological and physical symptoms measured with the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and (2) symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress measured with the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). The healthcare program consisted of two active treatment phases: main 20-week program and a subsequent continuation-phase intervention (i.e., 12-month relapse prevention program). Mixed linear models were used to examine the effects of the healthcare program on primary/secondary outcomes over four time points: before start 20-week program (T0), halfway 20-week program (T1), end of 20-week program (T2) and end of 12-month relapse prevention program (T3).

Results

Results showed significant improvements from T0 to T2 for the primary variable (i.e., RAND-36) and secondary variables (i.e., BSI/DASS). During the 12-month relapse prevention program, further significant improvements were mainly observed for secondary variables (i.e., BSI/DASS) and to a lesser extent for the primary variable (i.e., RAND-36). At the end of the relapse prevention program (i.e., T3), 63% of patients achieved remission of depressive symptoms (i.e., DASS depression score ≤ 9) and 67% of patients achieved remission of anxiety symptoms (i.e., DASS anxiety score ≤ 7).

Conclusion

An interdisciplinary multimodal integrative healthcare program, delivered within a transdiagnostic framework, seems effective for patients suffering from depressive and/or anxiety disorders with regard to HRQoL and symptoms of psychopathology. As reimbursement and funding for interdisciplinary multimodal interventions in this patient group has been under pressure in recent years, this study could add important evidence by reporting on routinely collected outcome data from a large patient group. Future studies should further investigate the long-term stability of treatment outcomes after interdisciplinary multimodal interventions for patients suffering from depressive and/or anxiety disorders.

Care pathways for people with major depressive disorder: a European Brain Council Value of Treatment study

Background

Despite well-established guidelines for managing major depressive disorder, its extensive disability burden persists. This Value of Treatment mission from the European Brain Council aimed to elucidate the nature and extent of “gaps” between best-practice and current-practice care, specifically to:Identify current treatment gaps along the care pathway and determine the extent of these gaps in comparison with the stepped-care model and Recommend policies intending to better meet patient needs (i.e., minimize treatment gaps).

Methods

After agreement upon a set of relevant treatment gaps, data pertaining to each gap were gathered and synthesized from several sources across six European countries. Subsequently, a modified Delphi approach was undertaken to attain consensus among an expert panel on proposed recommendations for minimizing treatment gaps.

Results

Four recommendations were made to increase the depression diagnosis rate (from ~50% episodes), aiming to both increase the number of patients seeking help, and the likelihood of a practitioner to correctly detect depression. These should reduce time to treatment (from ~1 to ~8 years after illness onset) and increase rates of treatment; nine further recommendations aimed to increase rates of treatment (from ~25 to ~50% of patients currently treated), mainly focused on targeting the best treatment to each patient. To improve follow-up after treatment initiation (from ~30 to ~65% followed up within 3 months), seven recommendations focused on increasing continuity of care. For those not responding, 10 recommendations focused on ensuring access to more specialist care (currently at rates of ~5–25% of patients).

Conclusions

The treatment gaps in depression care are substantial and concerning, from the proportion of people not entering care pathways to those stagnating in primary care with impairing and persistent illness. A wide range of recommendations can be made to enhance care throughout the pathway.

Patient perspectives of lithium and quetiapine augmentation treatment in treatment-resistant depression: A qualitative assessment

BACKGROUND

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) has a profound cost to patients and healthcare services worldwide. Pharmacological augmentation is one therapeutic option for TRD, with lithium and quetiapine currently recommended as first-line agents. Patient opinions about pharmacological augmentation may affect treatment outcomes, yet these have not been systematically explored.

AIMS

This study aimed to qualitatively assess patient experiences of lithium and quetiapine augmentation.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 patients from the ongoing lithium versus quetiapine open-label trial comparing these augmentation agents in patients with TRD. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and a thematic analysis was used to assess patient opinions of each agent.

RESULTS

Four main themes were generated from the thematic analysis: 'Initial concerns', 'Experience of side effects', 'Perception of treatment efficacy' and 'Positive perception of treatment monitoring'. Patient accounts indicated a predominantly positive experience of lithium and quetiapine augmentation. Greater apprehension about side effects was reported for lithium prior to treatment initiation, but greater experience of negative side effects was reported for quetiapine. Clinical monitoring was perceived positively.

CONCLUSION

Patient accounts suggested treatment augmentation with lithium or quetiapine was acceptable and helpful for most patients. However, anticipation and experiences of adverse side effects may prevent some patients from benefitting from these treatments.

Predicting clinical outcome to specialist multimodal inpatient treatment in patients with treatment resistant depression

BACKGROUND

Treatment resistant depression (TRD) poses a significant clinical challenge, despite a range of efficacious specialist treatments. Accurately predicting response a priori may help to alleviate the burden of TRD. This study sought to determine whether outcome prediction can be achieved in a specialist inpatient setting.

METHODS

Patients at the Affective Disorders Unit of the Bethlam Royal Hospital, with current depression and established TRD were included (N = 174). Patients were treated with an individualised combination of pharmacotherapy and specialist psychological therapies. Predictors included clinical and sociodemographic characteristics, and polygenic risk scores for depression and related traits. Logistic regression models examined associations with outcome, and predictive potential was assessed using elastic net regularised logistic regressions with 10-fold nested cross-validation.

RESULTS

47% of patients responded (50% reduction in HAMD-21 score at discharge). Age at onset and number of depressive episodes were positively associated with response, while degree of resistance was negatively associated. All elastic net models had poor performance (AUC<0.6). Illness history characteristics were commonly retained, and the addition of genetic risk scores did not improve performance.

LIMITATIONS

The patient sample was heterogeneous and received a variety of treatments. Some variable associations may be non-linear and therefore not captured.

CONCLUSIONS

This treatment may be most effective for recurrent patients and those with a later age of onset, while patients more severely treatment resistant at admission remain amongst the most difficult to treat. Individual level prediction remains elusive for this complex group. The assessment of homogenous subgroups should be one focus of future investigations.

Pharmacological Augmentation in Unipolar Depression: A Guide to the Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological augmentation is a recommended strategy for patients with treatment-resistant depression. A range of guidelines provide advice on treatment selection, prescription, monitoring and discontinuation, but variation in the content and quality of guidelines may limit the provision of objective, evidence-based care. This is of importance given the side effect burden and poorer long-term outcomes associated with polypharmacy and treatment-resistant depression. This review provides a definitive overview of pharmacological augmentation recommendations by assessing the quality of guidelines for depression and comparing the recommendations made.

METHODS

A systematic literature search identified current treatment guidelines for depression published in English. Guidelines were quality assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II tool. Data relating to the prescription of pharmacological augmenters were extracted from those developed with sufficient rigor, and the included recommendations compared.

RESULTS

Total of 1696 records were identified, 19 guidelines were assessed for quality, and 10 were included. Guidelines differed in their quality, the stage at which augmentation was recommended, the agents included, and the evidence base cited. Lithium and atypical antipsychotics were recommended by all 10, though the specific advice was not consistent. Of the 15 augmenters identified, no others were universally recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

This review provides a comprehensive overview of current pharmacological augmentation recommendations for major depression and will support clinicians in selecting appropriate treatment guidance. Although some variation can be accounted for by date of guideline publication, and limited evidence from clinical trials, there is a clear need for greater consistency across guidelines to ensure patients receive consistent evidence-based care.

Outcome of First-admission Depression Treated in a Specialized Mood Disorders Service

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have described the treatment or outcome of depression in specialized mood disorders units (MDUs). Previous studies have focused on cohorts of patients with highly treatment-resistant illness who are likely to have a poor prognosis even with intensive treatment. This study describes the treatment and medium-term outcomes of a cohort of first-admission depressed patients with less treatment-resistant illness treated in a specialized MDU.

METHODS

A cohort of 137 consecutive first-admission depressed patients, referred to an MDU over 2 years, were interviewed using standardized schedules and followed up prospectively from admission for ∼18 months to describe baseline characteristics, treatment, outcome, and predictors of outcome. Times to recovery and recurrence were evaluated using survival analyses and predictors of outcome were examined using bivariate and multivariate regression analyses.

RESULTS

On admission, 75% of the 137 patients had depression that had been found to be resistant to pharmacological treatment, and 34% had been chronically depressed (>2 y). Over half of the patients had likely maladaptive personality traits and one third had at least 1 comorbid psychiatric disorder. By discharge, a significantly higher proportion of the patients were being prescribed very high (P<0.01) or high doses (P<0.05) of antidepressants, augmentation therapy (P<0.001), or a combination of antidepressants (P<0.001) or were engaged in individual psychotherapy (P<0.001), compared with baseline. With intensive treatment, 62% of the patients recovered by 6 months and 76% by 12 months, with 83% overall recovering and patients found to be asymptomatic during almost 60% of the follow-up period. However, 48% suffered a recurrence over the course of the follow-up. Chronicity of mood episodes (P<0.01) and the presence of psychiatric comorbidity (P<0.05) predicted recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective, naturalistic, medium-term study describes better outcomes, in terms of recovery and symptomatology over time, in a cohort of first-admission depressed patients than previous first-admission studies after continuous, intensive treatment, although the proportion of patients who experienced recurrences remained high.

The CINP Guidelines on the Definition and Evidence-Based Interventions for Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Disorder

BACKGROUND

Resistant bipolar disorder is a major mental health problem related to significant disability and overall cost. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review of the literature concerning (1) the definition of treatment resistance in bipolar disorder, (2) its clinical and (3) neurobiological correlates, and (4) the evidence-based treatment options for treatment-resistant bipolar disorder and for eventually developing guidelines for the treatment of this condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The PRISMA method was used to identify all published papers relevant to the definition of treatment resistance in bipolar disorder and the associated evidence-based treatment options. The MEDLINE was searched to April 22, 2018.

RESULTS

Criteria were developed for the identification of resistance in bipolar disorder concerning all phases. The search of the literature identified all published studies concerning treatment options. The data were classified according to strength, and separate guidelines regarding resistant acute mania, acute bipolar depression, and the maintenance phase were developed.

DISCUSSION

The definition of resistance in bipolar disorder is by itself difficult due to the complexity of the clinical picture, course, and treatment options. The current guidelines are the first, to our knowledge, developed specifically for the treatment of resistant bipolar disorder patients, and they also include an operationalized definition of treatment resistance. They were based on a thorough and deep search of the literature and utilize as much as possible an evidence-based approach.

Inflammatory profiles of severe treatment-resistant depression

BACKGROUND

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) contributes substantially to the burden of mood disorders and is undoubtedly an important subpopulation in whom there are clear unmet treatment needs. Despite a paucity of research focusing specifically on TRD, recent studies indicate that inflammatory activity may be particularly elevated in these patients.

METHODS

36 patients with TRD were investigated longitudinally before and after undertaking a specialist inpatient treatment program. 27 inflammatory proteins were compared between patients and a matched sample of non-depressed controls, as well as between treatment responders and non-responders. Treatment outcomes were calculated from depression severity scores before and after admission, and at a long-term follow-up 3-12 months after discharge.

RESULTS

TRD patients had higher levels of numerous inflammatory proteins than controls, and elevated interleukins 6 and 8, tumour necrosis factor, c-reactive protein and macrophage inflammatory protein-1 were associated with poorer treatment outcomes. A separate set of proteins (either anti-inflammatory in nature or attenuated at baseline) showed increases during treatment, regardless of clinical response. Participants with the greatest elevations in inflammation tended to be older, more cognitively impaired and more treatment-resistant at baseline.

LIMITATIONS

The small sample and large number of comparisons examined in this study must be taken into account when interpreting these results.

CONCLUSIONS

However, this study provides empirical support for theories that more severe, chronic or treatment-resistant depressive disorders are associated with dysregulated inflammatory activity. If a predictor or predictors of response in TRD are established, improved and targeted care might be more reliably provided to this vulnerable population.

Study protocol for a randomised pragmatic trial comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of lithium and quetiapine augmentation in treatment resistant depression (the LQD study)

BACKGROUND

Approximately 30-50% of patients with major depressive disorder can be classed as treatment resistant, widely defined as a failure to respond to two or more adequate trials of antidepressants in the current episode. Treatment resistant depression is associated with a poorer prognosis and higher mortality rates. One treatment option is to augment an existing antidepressant with a second agent. Lithium and the atypical antipsychotic quetiapine are two such add-on therapies and are currently recommended as first line options for treatment resistant depression. However, whilst neither treatment has been established as superior to the other in short-term studies, they have yet to be compared head-to-head in longer term studies, or with a superiority design in this patient group.

METHODS

The Lithium versus Quetiapine in Depression (LQD) study is a parallel group, multi-centre, pragmatic, open-label, patient randomised clinical trial designed to address this gap in knowledge. The study will compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of the decision to prescribe lithium or quetiapine add-on therapy to antidepressant medication for patients with treatment resistant depression. Patients will be randomised 1:1 and followed up over 12 months, with the hypothesis being that quetiapine will be superior to lithium. The primary outcomes will be: (1) time to all-cause treatment discontinuation over one year, and (2) self-rated depression symptoms rated weekly for one year via the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology. Other outcomes will include between group differences in response and remission rates, quality of life, social functioning, cost-effectiveness and the frequency of serious adverse events and side effects.

DISCUSSION

The trial aims to help shape the treatment pathway for patients with treatment resistant depression, by determining whether the decision to prescribe quetiapine is superior to lithium. Strengths of the study include its pragmatic superiority design, broad inclusion criteria (external validity) and longer follow up than previous studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN16387615 , registered 28 February 2016. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03004521 , registered 17 November 2016.

Early-life experiences and the development of adult diseases with a focus on mental illness: The Human Birth Theory

In mammals, early adverse experiences, including mother-pup interactions, shape the response of an individual to chronic stress or to stress-related diseases during adult life. This has led to the elaboration of the theory of the developmental origins of health and disease, in particular adult diseases such as cardiovascular and metabolic disorders. In addition, in humans, as stated by Massimo Fagioli's Human Birth Theory, birth is healthy and equal for all individuals, so that mental illness develop exclusively in the postnatal period because of the quality of the relationship in the first year of life. Thus, this review focuses on the importance of programming during the early developmental period on the manifestation of adult diseases in both animal models and humans. Considering the obvious differences between animals and humans we cannot systematically move from animal models to humans. Consequently, in the first part of this review, we will discuss how animal models can be used to dissect the influence of adverse events occurring during the prenatal and postnatal periods on the developmental trajectories of the offspring, and in the second part, we will discuss the role of postnatal critical periods on the development of mental diseases in humans. Epigenetic mechanisms that cause reversible modifications in gene expression, driving the development of a pathological phenotype in response to a negative early postnatal environment, may lie at the core of this programming, thereby providing potential new therapeutic targets. The concept of the Human Birth Theory leads to a comprehension of the mental illness as a pathology of the human relationship immediately after birth and during the first year of life.

Symptom course in inpatient and day clinic treatment of depression: Results from the INDDEP-Study

BACKGROUND

In major depression (MDD), hospital treatment is an option in more severe cases or if outpatient treatment failed. Psychosomatic hospitals in Germany provide treatment programs with multimodal psychotherapy, either in an inpatient or a day hospital setting. In the context of health care research, this study aimed (1) to compare characteristics of patients treated in psychosomatic day hospitals and inpatient units, (2) to compare the effectiveness of both treatment modalities.

METHODS

A naturalistic design was chosen to achieve external validity. 604 consecutive patients were assessed at admission, discharge and a 3-month follow-up. Primary outcome was defined as a reduction of depressive symptomatology (QIDS-C), secondary outcomes comprise overall functioning and quality of life. For a comparison of effectiveness, inpatient and day hospital samples were matched according to known predictors of outcome.

RESULTS

The few differences found between the inpatient and day hospital sample were related to severity of depression and physical impairment. Inpatients more often got antidepressant medication. Additionally, inpatients were treated significantly longer, due to a subgroup of patients with somatic co-morbidity. There were no differences when comparing effectiveness.

LIMITATIONS

When comparing treatment effectiveness, possible bias cannot be ruled out. There was no randomization or untreated control group.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a more severe depression and somatic co-morbidity, inpatient treatment might be preferred as compared to day hospital treatment. However, most patients can be treated in both settings.