Bullying and psychotic symptoms in youth with bipolar disorder

The Types of Psychosocial Factors Associated with Suicidality Outcomes for People Living with Bipolar Disorder: A Scoping Review

Bipolar Disorder is associated with high rates of suicidal thoughts, behaviors, and outcomes, yet the lived experience of suicidality and Bipolar Disorder is not particularly well understood. Understanding the role of psychosocial aetiologies in suicidality outcomes for those living with Bipolar Disorder is key for developing appropriately targeted interventions focusing on factors that are amenable to change. In line with PRISMA guidance, we conducted a scoping review to identify the types of psychosocial factors studied in relation to the experience of suicidality for people living with Bipolar Disorder diagnoses. Systematic literature searches identified a sample of 166 articles from which key study data were extracted and charted. A narrative synthesis of the reviewed literature is presented ordered by the factors investigated across studies, a frequency count of the types of psychological/social aetiologies studied, and a brief overview of the key findings for each aetiology. Most of the identified literature took the form of quantitative cross-sectional studies, with only one qualitative study and 18 quantitative prospective studies. The most studied aetiologies were trauma (specifically early adverse experiences and childhood traumas) and stressful life events, impulsivity (primarily subjective self-reported trait impulsivity), social support and functioning, and personality/temperament factors. Only six studies in the final sample reported basing their research questions and/or hypotheses on an explicit theoretical model of suicide. The literature was primarily focused on using self-report measurements of key aetiologies and on factors which lead to worsened suicidality rather than focusing on potentially protective or buffering factors. Future research needs to better justify the aetiologies investigated in relation to suicidality outcomes for people living with Bipolar Disorder, including a firmer basis in theory and hypothesis testing, more prospective designs, and the use of alternative assessments of psychosocial aetiologies in addition to self-report questionnaires.

Pediatric Bipolar Disorder: A Practical Guide for Clinicians

Pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD) is a controversial clinical entity and it still needs to be satisfactorily defined. Having a polymorphous presentation and associated with numerous symptoms of comorbid psychiatric illnesses often diagnosed during childhood and adolescence, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, its symptoms do not completely parallel those of bipolar disorder in adults. The clinician must be able to reach a diagnosis of PBD in the presence of fluctuating and atypical symptoms, especially in children, who tend to experience mixed episodes and very rapid cycles. Historically a key symptom for diagnosing PBD is episodic irritability. Proper diagnosis is critical due to the gravity of its prognosis. Clinicians may find supporting evidence for a diagnosis through careful study of the medical and developmental history of the young patient in addition to psychometric data. Treatment prioritizes psychotherapeutic intervention and assigns important roles to family involvement and a healthy lifestyle.

The association between childhood bullying victimisation and childhood maltreatment with the clinical expression of bipolar disorder

Adverse childhood experiences are significantly associated with a worse clinical expression of bipolar disorder, however, the literature has mainly focused on childhood maltreatment (abuse and neglect) with little attention paid to other forms of adversity, such as childhood bullying victimisation (referred to here as bullying), although this is known to have a negative impact on different psychiatric illnesses. The current study aimed to investigate the association between bullying victimisation and the clinical expression of bipolar disorder individually and in combination with childhood maltreatment. This investigation consisted of 63 individuals with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder (mean age 61.4 years) who completed the Retrospective Bullying Questionnaire and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire to measure exposure to bullying and childhood maltreatment, respectively. The clinical expression variables were assessed using self-report instruments, these were: the Cardiff Anomalous Perceptions Scale (psychotic symptoms), Suicide Behaviours Questionnaire, Self-Report Manic Inventory, Beck Anxiety and Depression Inventories. The results showed that exposure to bullying was significantly associated with more suicidal behaviours (F(1,61) = 11.02, p < .01, η² = 0.15) and psychotic symptoms (F(1,61) = 4.21, p < .05, η² = .06). When bullying and childhood maltreatment histories were combined, the results showed that individuals with a history of both adversity types reported significantly more suicidal behaviours (F(2,60) = 6.59, p < .01, R²=.18) compared to those with a history of one or neither form of adversity. The sample size, age and gender distribution, limit the generalisability of the findings. However, the current results underscore the need to account for bullying victimisation when considering the adverse childhood experiences-bipolar disorder relationship, especially its clinical expression.

Retrospective chart review-based assessment scale for adverse childhood events and experiences

Aim

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are highly prevalent in the general population, and their lifelong impact on physical and mental health is profound. In assessing ACEs, it is vital to consider the pathways and modalities by which an individual internalizes events as an adverse experience and its effects on their biological, psychological, and social function. However, conventional assessments of ACEs are inadequate in that they do not comprehensively assess the source of the adverse event and the pathway and mode of its impact on the individual.

Methods

This study developed an original scale for ACEs that classifies the source of the event and the pathway and mode of its impact on the individual from a retrospective review of medical charts. We also used this scale to investigate the ACEs in 536 patients with psychiatric disorders (depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia).

Results

This scale consisted of 28 items, and its reliability and validity were sufficient. We also found that 45.9% of the patients studied had at least one ACE, ranging from 43.5% to 51.5% for all disorders. Psychological trauma (bullying) from peers was the most common cause at 27.2%.

Conclusion

We developed a retrospective chart review-based assessment tool for ACEs which enables the examination of the source of the events of ACEs and the pathways and modalities of their impact on the individual. The frequency of ACEs is high regardless of the type of psychiatric disorder, and horizontal trauma (bullying victimization) is as frequent as vertical trauma (parental maltreatment).

The clinical characterization of the adult patient with bipolar disorder aimed at personalization of management

Bipolar disorder is heterogeneous in phenomenology, illness trajectory, and response to treatment. Despite evidence for the efficacy of multimodal-ity interventions, the majority of persons affected by this disorder do not achieve and sustain full syndromal recovery. It is eagerly anticipated that combining datasets across various information sources (e.g., hierarchical "multi-omic" measures, electronic health records), analyzed using advanced computational methods (e.g., machine learning), will inform future diagnosis and treatment selection. In the interim, identifying clinically meaningful subgroups of persons with the disorder having differential response to specific treatments at point-of-care is an empirical priority. This paper endeavours to synthesize salient domains in the clinical characterization of the adult patient with bipolar disorder, with the overarching aim to improve health outcomes by informing patient management and treatment considerations. Extant data indicate that characterizing select domains in bipolar disorder provides actionable information and guides shared decision making. For example, it is robustly established that the presence of mixed features - especially during depressive episodes - and of physical and psychiatric comorbidities informs illness trajectory, response to treatment, and suicide risk. In addition, early environmental exposures (e.g., sexual and physical abuse, emotional neglect) are highly associated with more complicated illness presentations, inviting the need for developmentally-oriented and integrated treatment approaches. There have been significant advances in validating subtypes of bipolar disorder (e.g., bipolar I vs. II disorder), particularly in regard to pharmacological interventions. As with other severe mental disorders, social functioning, interpersonal/family relationships and internalized stigma are domains highly relevant to relapse risk, health outcomes, and quality of life. The elevated standardized mortality ratio for completed suicide and suicidal behaviour in bipolar disorder invites the need for characterization of this domain in all patients. The framework of this paper is to describe all the above salient domains, providing a synthesis of extant literature and recommendations for decision support tools and clinical metrics that can be implemented at point-of-care.

Prevalence of psychotic symptoms and their impact on course and outcome of patients with bipolar disorder: Findings from the Bipolar Disorder Course and Outcome study from India (BiD-CoIN study)

AIM

Most of the available data on the prevalence and impact of psychotic symptoms on the course of bipolar disorder (BD) is from Western countries. We aimed to study the prevalence of at least one psychotic episode in the lifetime in patients with BD and its association with the long-term course and outcome.

METHODOLOGY

773 patients recruited as part of the Bipolar Disorder Course and Outcome study from India (BiD-CoIN study) were divided into 2 groups, based on the presence or absence of at least one psychotic episode in the lifetime.

RESULTS

326 (42.2%) patients had at least one psychotic episode in their lifetime. At least one psychotic episode in the lifetime was associated with overall more severe illness in terms of lower age of onset, a higher number of episodes in the first 5 years of illness; higher rates of BD-II, a higher rate of lifetime history of at least 1 suicide attempt, lifetime history of hospitalization, history of receiving Electroconvulsive Therapy, and a higher prescription rates of antipsychotics. However, presence of psychotics symptoms was associated with better cognitive functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that the presence of psychotic symptoms during episodes in patients with BD is associated with poorer course of BD.