Association between concurrent antidepressant and hypnotic treatment and the risk of dementia: A nationwide cohort study

Risks of mental disorders among inpatients with burn injury: A nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This investigation identified the association between burn injuries and the risk of mental disorders in patients with no documented pre-existing psychiatric comorbidities. We also examined the relationship of injury severity and the types of injury with the likelihood of receiving new diagnoses of mental disorders.

METHODS

This population-based retrospective cohort study used administrative data extracted from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) between 2000 and 2013. In total, 10,045 burn survivors were matched with a reference cohort of 40,180 patients without burn injuries and were followed to determine if any mental disorder was diagnosed. Patients diagnosed with mental disorders in the five years before study initiation were excluded to ensure incident diagnoses throughout the research duration. Generalized estimating equations in Cox proportional hazard regression models were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

In general, burn injury survivors have a 1.21-fold risk of being diagnosed with new mental disorders relative to patients without burn injuries. Total body surface area (TBSA) of ≧ 30% (aHR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.36-1.63) and third- or fourth-degree burns (aHR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.37-1.63) had a significantly greater risk of being diagnosed with mental disorders in comparison to the reference cohort. Patients TBSA 10-29% (aHR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.77-0.93) and first- or second-degree burn victims (aHR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.97) had relatively lower risk of mental disorders than the reference cohort.

CONCLUSION

Burn injuries were associated with an increased risk of mental disorders. Additional research in this field could elucidate this observation, especially if the inherent limitations of the NHIRD can be overcome.

Association Between Hypnotics and Dementia: A Mini Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the existing literature on the relationship between hypnotics and dementia, considering both potential link and inconclusive or lack of association.

METHODS

Data from studies that investigate the association between hypnotic medications and dementia were reviewed. Studies included both cohort studies and systematic reviews, participants with various type of dementia and hypnotics including benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs (ZDs).

RESULTS

The existing literatures presents conflicting evidence regarding the association between hypnotics, including BZDs and ZDs, and the risk of dementia. Some studies suggest a potential link between prolonged use of hypnotics and an increased risk of dementia. However, other studies indicate inconclusive or lacking evidence regarding this association. Factors such as study design, sample characteristics, and control of confounding variables contribute to the variability in findings.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between hypnotics and dementia remains complex and controversial. While some studies suggest a potential association, others find inconclusive or conflicting evidence. Future research should focus on addressing methodological limitations, considering classifying dementia subtypes, and try to adjust medication lag time.

Benzodiazepine use and risk of incident MCI and dementia in a community sample

OBJECTIVES

Older adults commonly take benzodiazepines (BZDs) that may have long-term adverse cognitive effects. We investigated whether BZD use was related to developing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia in cognitively normal older adults in the community.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

A population-based cohort (n = 1959) of adults aged 65 and over, recruited from communities of low socioeconomic status.

MEASUREMENTS

BZD use, Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, sleep difficulties, and APOE genotype.

DESIGN

We examined time from study entry to MCI (CDR = 0.5) and time from study entry to dementia (CDR ≥ 1) in participants who were cognitively normal at baseline (CDR = 0). We used survival analysis (Cox model), adjusted for age, sex, education, sleep, anxiety, and depression. For all the models, we included an interaction term between BZD use and APOE*4.

RESULTS

Taking BZDs was significantly associated with higher risk of developing MCI, but not of developing dementia. The effect was not affected by APOE genotype.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population-based sample of cognitively normal older adults, BZD use is associated with developing MCI, but not dementia. BZD use may be a potentially modifiable risk factor for MCI.

Risks of mental disorders among intensive care unit survivors: A nationwide cohort study in Taiwan

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the risk of mental disorders among the intensive care unit (ICU) survivors compared with the hospitalized non-ICU and non-hospitalized patients.

METHOD

We extracted data from the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) to conduct a retrospective cohort study. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the data. Identified from the NHIRD, we matched 15,918 patients with ICU admissions, 63,672 patients without any inpatient admission (non-inpatient department [non-IPD] cohort), and 63,672 patients admitted to a general ward but not the ICU (non-ICU cohort). The patient records were extracted between the periods of 2000-2015 to identify any occurrence of mental disorders.

RESULTS

During the study period, the overall risk of mental disorder diagnosis was 1.68-fold higher in the ICU cohort than the non-IPD cohort (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-1.89, P < 0.001). Alternatively, there were no differences in risks for any mental disorders between the ICU and non-ICU cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Both admissions to the ICU and the general ward cohorts were associated with a higher risk of any mental disorders compared to the general population. Further clinical studies are warranted to confirm this association due to residual or unmeasured risk factors.