Understanding the heterogeneity of dynamic functional connectivity patterns in first-episode drug naïve depression using normative models

The power of many brains: Catalyzing neuropsychiatric discovery through open neuroimaging data and large-scale collaboration

Recent advances in open neuroimaging data are enhancing our comprehension of neuropsychiatric disorders. By pooling images from various cohorts, statistical power has increased, enabling the detection of subtle abnormalities and robust associations, and fostering new research methods. Global collaborations in imaging have furthered our knowledge of the neurobiological foundations of brain disorders and aided in imaging-based prediction for more targeted treatment. Large-scale magnetic resonance imaging initiatives are driving innovation in analytics and supporting generalizable psychiatric studies. We also emphasize the significant role of big data in understanding neural mechanisms and in the early identification and precise treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, challenges such as data harmonization across different sites, privacy protection, and effective data sharing must be addressed. With proper governance and open science practices, we conclude with a projection of how large-scale imaging resources and collaborations could revolutionize diagnosis, treatment selection, and outcome prediction, contributing to optimal brain health.

pNet: A toolbox for personalized functional networks modeling

Personalized functional networks (FNs) derived from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data are useful for characterizing individual variations in the brain functional topography associated with the brain development, aging, and disorders. To facilitate applications of the personalized FNs with enhanced reliability and reproducibility, we develop an open-source toolbox that is user-friendly, extendable, and includes rigorous quality control (QC), featuring multiple user interfaces (graphics, command line, and a step-by-step guideline) and job-scheduling for high performance computing (HPC) clusters. Particularly, the toolbox, named personalized functional network modeling (pNet), takes fMRI inputs in either volumetric or surface type, ensuring compatibility with multiple fMRI data formats, and computes personalized FNs using two distinct modeling methods: one method optimizes the functional coherence of FNs, while the other enhances their independence. Additionally, the toolbox provides HTML-based reports for QC and visualization of personalized FNs. The toolbox is developed in both MATLAB and Python platforms with a modular design to facilitate extension and modification by users familiar with either programming language. We have evaluated the toolbox on two fMRI datasets and demonstrated its effectiveness and user-friendliness with interactive and scripting examples. pNet is publicly available at https://github.com/MLDataAnalytics/pNet.

Using normative modeling to assess pharmacological treatment effect on brain state in patients with schizophrenia

Quantifying individual differences in neuroimaging metrics is attracting interest in clinical studies with mental disorders. Schizophrenia is diagnosed exclusively based on symptoms, and the biological heterogeneity makes it difficult to accurately assess pharmacological treatment effects on the brain state. Using the Cambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience data set, we built normative models of brain states and mapped the deviations of the brain characteristics of each patient, to test whether deviations were related to symptoms, and further investigated the pharmacological treatment effect on deviation distributions. Specifically, we found that the patients can be divided into 2 groups: the normalized group had a normalization trend and milder symptoms at baseline, and the other group showed a more severe deviation trend. The baseline severity of the depression as well as the overall symptoms could predict the deviation of the static characteristics for the dorsal and ventral attention networks after treatment. In contrast, the positive symptoms could predict the deviations of the dynamic fluctuations for the default mode and dorsal attention networks after treatment. This work evaluates the effect of pharmacological treatment on static and dynamic brain states using an individualized approach, which may assist in understanding the heterogeneity of the illness pathology as well as the treatment response.

Linking individual variability in functional brain connectivity to polygenic risk in major depressive disorder

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a highly heterogeneous disease, which brings great difficulties to clinical diagnosis and therapy. Its mechanism is still unknown. Prior neuroimaging studies mainly focused on mean differences between patients and healthy controls (HC), largely ignoring individual differences between patients.

METHODS

This study included 112 MDD patients and 93 HC subjects. Resting-state functional MRI data were obtained to examine the patterns of individual variability of brain functional connectivity (IVFC). The genetic risk of pathways including dopamine, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), norepinephrine (NE), hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and synaptic plasticity was assessed by multilocus genetic profile scores (MGPS), respectively.

RESULTS

The IVFC pattern of the MDD group was similar but higher than that in HCs. The inter-network functional connectivity in the default mode network contributed to altered IVFC in MDD. 5-HT, NE, and HPA pathway genes affected IVFC in MDD patients. The age of onset, duration, severity, and treatment response, were correlated with IVFC. IVFC in the left ventromedial prefrontal cortex had a mediating effect between MGPS of the 5-HT pathway and baseline depression severity.

LIMITATIONS

Environmental factors and differences in locations of functional areas across individuals were not taken into account.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found MDD patients had significantly different inter-individual functional connectivity variations than healthy people, and genetic risk might affect clinical manifestations through brain function heterogeneity.