Psychological Resilience to the Challenges of Physical Aging in Older U.S. Veterans: Results From the 2019-2020 National Health and Resilience in Veterans Study

The Relationship Between Negative Coping Styles, Psychological Resilience, and Positive Coping Styles in Military Personnel: A Cross-Lagged Analysis

Background

Military personnel experience prolonged exposure to high-stress environments. Positive coping styles can assist in maintaining their mental and behavioral well-being, whereas negative coping styles cannot. Health behavior change theory specifies that an individual can transition from a negative to a positive coping style. The psychological resilience concept may prove vital in this transition.

Methods

In a longitudinal study design, two questionnaires were administered to 233 military personnel twice, the first at T1 in April 2023 and the second at T2 in July 2023. The questionnaire measured individual negative coping style, positive coping style and psychological resilience.

Results

The data showed that the negative coping style at T1 negatively predicted the level of psychological resilience at T2 (γ= - 0.26, p < 0.001) and the positive coping style at T2 (γ= - 0.16, p < 0.001). The level of psychological resilience at T1 positively predicted the positive coping style at T2 (γ= 0.22, p < 0.01). Psychological resilience played a mediating role between negative coping style and positive coping style. In addition, there was an interaction between psychological resilience and positive coping style in military personnel at the two time points.

Conclusion

The negative coping styles that presently exist among military personnel have the potential to diminish their future positive coping styles by lowering their psychological resilience. This highlights the need to focus on the development and training of psychological resilience for military personnel, as it can effectively counteract negative coping styles and promote positive coping styles.

Resilience in Older People: A Concept Analysis

(1) Background: Resilience has been presented as a potential protective factor to be promoted in difficult experiences in older people. However, further clarification of the concept of resilience for this population is required, as this is of critical interest for nursing care. (2) Aim: To develop the concept of resilience in older people to establish the elements that refer to the nursing outcome. Personal resilience (1309) from the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), specifically in older people. (3) Methods: Concept analysis using Beth Rodgers' evolutionary model. The attributes, antecedents, consequents, and empirical elements were described in the integrative review, with searches in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, and Embase databases. A total of 2431 citations have been identified, and 110 studies were included. (4) Results: The concept of "resilience in older people" is composed of two attributes, available resources and positive behaviors, and is defined as positive attitudes of older people with the assistance of resources available from experiences of adversity. Conclusion: This analysis and concept development of resilience in older people provided sensitive indicators for nursing care in the context of adversity, considering available resources and with positive attitudes during this phase of life span.

Reserve and resilience in CKD: concept introduction and baseline results from the Physical REsilience Prediction in Advanced REnal Disease (PREPARED) study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this manuscript is to introduce reserve and resilience as novel concepts in chronic kidney disease (CKD) research and present baseline data from a unique prospective cohort study designed to characterize recovery from functional decline after a health event.

METHODS

The Physical REsilience Prediction in Advanced REnal Disease (PREPARED) study recruited a national, prospective cohort of Veterans ≥70 years old with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min/1.73 m², prior nephrology care, and at high risk for hospitalization. Electronic health record data were paired with telephone surveys. Self-reported measures of reserve included physical, psychological, and cognitive capacity and environmental resources. We calculated counts (frequencies) and medians (25th, 75th percentiles) for baseline measures of reserve. The study's longitudinal follow-up of physical function every 8 weeks or following an acute care encounter, which will be used to define resilience, is ongoing.

RESULTS

Participants had a median (25th, 75th percentile) age of 76.3 (72.8, 81.4) years and eGFR of 23.4 (18.2, 28.8) ml/min/1.73 m²; 23.3% were Black, and 97.4% were male, 91.6% had hypertension, 67.4% had diabetes mellitus, 46.0% had coronary heart disease, and 39.8% had heart failure. Baseline measures of physical, psychological, and cognitive domains showed low reserve on average, but with wide ranges.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar levels of kidney function, older adults participating in PREPARED had a wide range of measures of reserve in other health domains. Non-renal measures of reserve may be important indicators of capacity of CKD patients to recover after acute care encounters.