Trends in Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations for Acute Allergic Reactions and Anaphylaxis Among US Older Adults: 2006-2014

Disease burden and unmet need for acute allergic reactions - A patient perspective

Background

Acute allergic reactions (AARs) occur shortly after exposure to an allergen, and the severity is on a continuum. Systemic corticosteroids (CS) are mainstay treatment of moderate to severe AARs, whereas those at risk of the most severe AARs (ie, anaphylaxis) are also recommended prescription of epinephrine autoinjectors. There is limited research on the impact of AARs not fulfilling the criteria for anaphylaxis. We have characterized a sample with a history of moderate to severe AARs and evaluated their self-reported disease burden (ie, daily life impact, anxiety, and treatment impediments).

Methods

Survey study of adults with experience of AARs treated with CS. Participants recruited from a web-based panel and using social media were asked to complete a questionnaire related to their allergy and experience of AARs. The results were summarized for the whole sample and across subgroups with and without prescription of epinephrine.

Results

The final study sample included 387 participants (80% women, mean age 41), of which 129 (33%) had at some point been prescribed epinephrine. The most common symptoms were respiratory (80%) and skin (78%) manifestations, and the mean (standard deviation, SD) self-rated severity score (scale from 0 [very mild] to 10 [very severe]) of the most recent AAR was 6.1 (2.0). More than 80% had experience of AARs interrupting daily activities and 50% of AARs that had limited work/studies or participation in leisure activities. Most of the respondents reported some degree of anxiety related to AARs and 43% had feared for their lives. Moreover, difficulties swallowing allergy medicine at an AAR was experienced by 26% and not having the medicine available when needed by 66%. Participants with prescription of epinephrine experienced more severe AARs than those without such prescription (mean [SD] severity 6.8 [2.1] vs 5.8 [1.8], p < 0.0001); however, also those without epinephrine prescription reported considerable anxiety and impact on daily life and to a similar degree as those with prescription.

Conclusions

In this sample, subjects with experience of AARs treated with CS showed a considerable disease burden with anxiety and interruption on daily life, as well as problems related to access to, and swallowing of, medication. Although respondents with epinephrine prescription had more severe disease, a high disease burden was also evident among those without epinephrine. The study increases the knowledge of people with moderate to severe AARs, a patient population that has previously been underrepresented in the research literature.

Analysis of drug-induced anaphylaxis cases using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database - secondary publication

BACKGROUND

The epidemiology of drug-induced anaphylaxis using the Japanese nationwide database has been not reported, even though drugs are a common trigger of anaphylaxis. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiological profile of cases of drug-induced anaphylaxis, including fatal cases, using the data from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER).

METHODS

We extracted data regarding drug-related adverse events, between April 2004 and February 2018, published in JADER by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. We analyzed cases of anaphylaxis occurring between January 2005 and December 2017. The drug classification was based on the Japanese Standard Commodity Classification.

RESULTS

There were 16,916 cases of anaphylaxis reported during the study period. Among them, 418 fatalities were registered. The incidence of drug-induced anaphylaxis and fatal cases was 1.03 cases/year per 100,000 population and 0.03 cases/year, respectively. The most frequent causes of anaphylaxis were diagnostic agents, including X-ray contrast media (20.3%), and biological preparations, such as human blood preparations (20.1%). In fatal cases, diagnostic agents (28.7%) and antibiotic preparations (23.9%) were the most commonly associated types of drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of drug-induced anaphylaxis and fatalities in Japan remained unchanged over the 13-year period analyzed in this study. Diagnostic agents and biological preparations were the most frequent causes of anaphylaxis; however, fatalities were most frequently caused by either diagnostic agents or antibiotic preparations.

Contemporary trends in anaphylaxis burden and healthcare utilisation in Western Australia: A linked data study

Background

Anaphylaxis is a growing public health problem in Australia. To determine the extent of the problem, we linked multiple health datasets to examine temporal trends in anaphylaxis events across the health system in Western Australia (WA).

Methods

We identified an anaphylaxis cohort from 1980 to 2020 using linked datasets from ambulance, emergency departments, hospital inpatients and deaths. Age-standardised anaphylaxis event rates were calculated from 2010 to 2020. Dataset-specific rates for anaphylaxis were also examined, to show differences in health care utilisation. Annual percent change in rates (2010-2019) were estimated using age-adjusted Poisson regression models.

Results

A total of 19 140 individuals (mean age 31 years; 51% female) experienced 24 239 anaphylaxis events between 2010 and 2020. From 2010 to 2019, the average annual percent increase (95% CI) in rates was 5.3% (4.8-5.8%), from 70.3 to 113.9, with rates reducing to 76.5/100 000 population in 2020. Adolescents and young adults aged 5-14 years and 15-24 years had the greatest increase of 6.9% (5.6-8.1%) and 6.8% (5.6-8.0) respectively, with those over 25 years increasing by approximately 5% per year and children 1-4 years showing the lowest annual increase of 2.6% (1.1-4.2%). The highest absolute rates were seen in under 1 year (269.7/100 000; 2019). There has been an acceleration of trends from 2015 to 2019, underpinned by large increases in 15-24 and 25-34 years. All databases, show similar increasing trends, with ambulance attendance (33.7 per 100 000), emergency presentation (89.8 per 100 000) and hospital admissions (46.2 per 100 000), for anaphylaxis highest in 2019. However, whilst ambulance and emergency presentations have grown by 8.9% (95%CI 7.9-9.8%) and 6.6% per year (95%CI 6.0-7.2%), respectively, hospitalisations appear to be steadying with only a 0.9% (95%CI 0.2-1.6%) yearly rise.

Conclusion

Rates of anaphylaxis continue to increase, with WA having higher rates than previous estimates for Australia. Whilst rates are still high in infants, lower trends in children compared to older ages may indicate better prevention of allergy. Results show more people experiencing anaphylaxis now receive care in emergency and ambulance, rather than hospital. Further exploration of the patient care journey through prehospital and inpatient care is required, to understand the changing health demands of people who experience anaphylaxis.

Epinephrine treatment of food-induced and other cause anaphylaxis in United States and Canadian Emergency Departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Studies from more than 10 years ago showed epinephrine treatment of food-induced anaphylaxis in the emergency department (ED) was unacceptably low. We investigated whether epinephrine treatment of food-induced and other cause anaphylaxis in United States and Canadian EDs has changed over time.

METHODS

Guided by a health sciences librarian, we performed a systematic search in Medline, Embase, and Web of Science on 11 January 2023. We included observational studies that reported epinephrine use to treat anaphylaxis in the ED. We stratified by anaphylaxis etiology (food-, venom-, medication-induced, or any cause). Associations between year and epinephrine use were tested using Spearman correlation and proportional meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Of 2458 records identified in our initial search, 40 met inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 examined food-induced, 4 venom-induced, 0 medication-induced, and 24 any cause anaphylaxis. For epinephrine treatment of food-induced anaphylaxis in the ED, among studies using similar definition of anaphylaxis, meta-analysis showed a pooled value of 20.7% (95% CI 17.8, 23.8) for studies performed >10 years ago and 45.1% (95% CI 38.4, 52.0) from those in the last 10 years. For anaphylaxis of any cause, there was no change over time, with a pooled value of 45.0% (95% CI 39.8, 50.3) over the last 10 years.

DISCUSSION

Epinephrine treatment of food-induced anaphylaxis in the ED has increased over time. There was no clear change for anaphylaxis of any cause. Over the last 10 years, approximately 45% of ED patients with anaphylaxis received epinephrine. A limitation of the evidence is heterogeneity in anaphylaxis definitions.

Anaphylaxis in elderly people

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Anaphylaxis is common in old-age adults but is insufficiently understood by physicians, and may be underdiagnosed. This review discusses the specificities of anaphylaxis in this age group and stresses the importance of adrenaline in its management.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry on elderly patients is a major finding. Other findings include the prevention of possible anaphylactic reactions in coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination as well as some new epidemiologic data.

SUMMARY

The most common risk factors are hymenoptera venom and food and drug allergy. Cardiovascular symptoms are the most important ones to reverse in old-age adults, especially due to the multiple comorbidities. Anaphylaxis in old-age adults has a more severe outcome than in younger ones. Polypharmacy is a specific factor to be considered. The Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Exposure (ABCDE) algorithm is applicable in all clinical emergencies for immediate assessment and treatment, and should be considered for all patients. Adrenaline is the mainstay of the management of the condition. There are no absolute contraindications to the prescription of self-injectable adrenaline in elderly individuals at risk of anaphylaxis.

Anaphylaxis among elderly emergency department patients in a large health system in New York

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis in the elderly is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate demographic, clinical, and management characteristics of older adults presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) criteria-confirmed anaphylaxis vs milder, non-anaphylactic acute allergic reactions (AARs).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of ED patients more than or equal to 65 years was conducted, using anaphylaxis International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes or ICD-9-based algorithms incorporating the NIAID diagnostic criteria. Descriptive statistics were generated, and the abovementioned characteristics were compared between cohorts.

RESULTS

Of 164 eligible visits, 71 (43.3%), 90 (54.9%), and 3 (1.8%) cases were identified by ICD-9 codes, the algorithms, or both, respectively. Only half fulfilled NIAID diagnostic criteria. Compared with the non-anaphylactic AAR group, criteria-confirmed anaphylaxis group had lower drug allergy rates (43.9% vs 61.0%, P = .03) but higher food allergy rates (26.8% vs 12.2%, P = .02). For the criteria-confirmed anaphylaxis group, presenting signs and symptoms in descending frequency were mucocutaneous, respiratory, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal. Criteria-confirmed anaphylaxis group had higher rates of prior anaphylaxis (13.4% vs 2.4%, P = .009), pre-ED (12.2% vs 0.0%, P = .001) or ED (72.0% vs 4.9%, P < .001) epinephrine administration, and allergy referral (17.1% vs 2.4%, P = .002). Tryptase levels were rarely ordered, occurring once in the criteria-confirmed anaphylaxis group and never in the non-anaphylactic AAR group. Despite low mortality (n = 1), 64.6% of the criteria-confirmed anaphylaxis cohort required hospitalization, with 23.2% admitted to intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of elderly ED patients with anaphylaxis remains suboptimal. Identifying NIAID criteria-confirmed cases remain challenging, using the existing methods. Management of these patients poorly adheres to current guidelines.