Response to Omalizumab in Black and White Patients with Allergic Asthma

Future of biologics in pediatric asthma: Optimizing response, early introduction, and equitable access to treatment

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the current evidence, its limitations, and future research directions for the use of biologics in pediatric asthma, with a particular focus on the potential use of biologics to prevent pediatric asthma and equity issues in access to biologic treatment and research participation.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed articles about the use of biologics in pediatric asthma were searched up to May 2023.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Recent (2019-2023) original research articles and reviews were prioritized.

RESULTS

Although there are now 5 U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved biologics for use in pediatric asthma, there are important knowledge gaps that ongoing research seeks to address, which include (1) the long-term efficacy and safety of using biologics in children, (2) the comparative efficacy of different biologics, (3) multi-omics-based classification of asthma endotypes and phenotypes in children to find potential new therapeutic targets and enable identification and validation of new biomarkers that may predict and help monitor response to treatment, and (4) whether starting biologics in early childhood can modify the natural history of asthma and potentially prevent asthma development.

SUMMARY

To promote equitable access to biologics and optimize asthma outcomes, future research should recruit patients across the full spectrum of socioeconomic and racial/ethnic backgrounds. Large-scale national and international collaborations between asthma researchers and clinicians are also necessary to fully understand the role of biologics in pediatric asthma.

Effects of omalizumab combined with budesonide formoterol on clinical efficacy, pulmonary function, immune function, and adverse reactions in children with moderate and severe allergic asthma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining omalizumab with budesonide formoterol to treat children with moderate and severe allergic asthma, and investigate the effect of this combination therapy on pulmonary and immune functions.

METHODS

The data of 88 children with moderate and severe allergic asthma, who were admitted to our hospital between July 2021 and July 2022, were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned either to control group (n = 44; received budesonide formoterol inhalation therapy) or experimental group (n = 44; received omalizumab subcutaneous injection + budesonide formoterol inhalation therapy) using computer-generated randomization. The clinical efficacy, asthma control (measured using childhood Asthma-Control Test [C-ACT] score), pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity, and peak expiratory flow), immune function (cluster of differentiation 3 cells [CD3⁺ cells], cluster of differentiation 4 cells [CD4⁺ cells], immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin A, and immunoglobulin E), and adverse reactions were observed and compared between both groups.

RESULTS

After treatment, the experimental group had improved levels of pulmonary function and immune function indexes, higher C-ACT scores, and a higher overall response rate than the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions was not significantly different between both groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of omalizumab with budesonide formoterol for treating moderate and severe allergic asthma in children demonstrated promising clinical efficacy and improved their pulmonary and immune functions, leading to more rational asthma control. The combined regimen demonstrated satisfactory clinical safety and deserved clinical promotion.

Factors to Consider in Prescribing Asthma Biologic Therapies to Children

The increasing availability of biologics, both by expanding age indications and by development of new therapies, provides additional options to treat children and adolescents with severe asthma. However, the evidence for these biologics in these populations is limited compared with that for adult studies. As such, before initiation of therapy, possible alternative therapies that can also provide asthma control, confirmation of the diagnosis of asthma, management of comorbidities, and assessment of adherence should be explored. The choice of a biologic should be a shared decision-making process between providers and families, balancing biologic efficacy, goals of care, administration, and ability to treat multiple conditions. Response to treatment should be periodically evaluated not only to ensure an ineffective treatment is not continued but also to consider when to potentially discontinue therapy should it be beneficial. The utilization of biologics in children and adolescents with severe asthma also leads to unanswered questions on their role in disease remission and long-term outcomes.

Pharmacokinetic equivalence of CT-P39 and reference omalizumab in healthy individuals: A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 1 trial

BACKGROUND

CT-P39 is being developed as a biosimilar of reference omalizumab. This study aimed to assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of CT-P39 to European Union-approved and United States-licensed reference omalizumab (EU- and US-omalizumab, respectively).

METHODS

This two-part, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind Phase 1 trial (NCT04018313) was conducted in healthy individuals with a total immunoglobulin E (IgE) level ≤100  international units (IU)/ml at screening. In part 2, described herein, participants were randomised (1:1:1) to receive a single 150 mg subcutaneous dose of CT-P39, EU-omalizumab, or US-omalizumab. The primary endpoint was pharmacokinetic equivalence in terms of area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-last ), AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0-inf ), and maximum serum concentration (Cmax ). Equivalence was concluded if 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric least-squares means ratios were contained within the predefined 80%-125% equivalence margin. Additional pharmacokinetic parameters, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 146 participants were randomised (CT-P39, N = 47; EU-omalizumab, N = 49; US-omalizumab, N = 50). For all primary pharmacokinetic parameters, 90% CIs for pairwise treatment comparisons were within the 80%-125% equivalence margin, demonstrating pharmacokinetic equivalence. Decreases in free IgE and increases in total IgE serum concentrations were comparable across groups. CT-P39 was well tolerated. Safety endpoints were comparable across groups: there were no treatment-related serious adverse events, deaths, or discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-P39 was well tolerated and demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence with EU-omalizumab and US-omalizumab following administration of a single dose in healthy individuals.

Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Literature Review

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterized by recurring wheals that last 6 weeks or longer without an identifiable cause. The estimated point prevalence of CSU worldwide is 1%. Furthermore, it has a significant impact on quality of life in both adults and pediatric patients and their families. Although it is most often a self-limited disease, some patients have urticaria refractory to first-line treatment: second-generation H1 antihistamines. In these patients, the use of targeted monoclonal antibodies is necessary. While omalizumab is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved monoclonal antibody for CSU, others, including ligelizumab, dupilumab, benralizumab, and several orally administered Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are also promising therapeutics for reducing the morbidity of CSU. Novel therapies, among others discussed here, are rapidly being developed with new trials and therapeutics being released nearly monthly. Thus, we performed a scoping literature review of randomized controlled trials studying targeted therapies for CSU. We also discuss the pathophysiology, diagnosis, prognosis, and future research directions in CSU.