Clinical Assessment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

A multi-view fusion lightweight network for CRSwNPs prediction on CT images

Accurate preoperative differentiation of the chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) endotype between eosinophilic CRS (eCRS) and non-eosinophilic CRS (non-eCRS) is an important topic in predicting postoperative outcomes and administering personalized treatment. To this end, we have constructed a sinus CT dataset, which comprises CT scan data and pathological biopsy results from 192 patients of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College between 2020 and 2022. To differentiate CRSwNP endotype on preoperative CT and improve efficiency at the same time, we developed a multi-view fusion model that contains a mini-architecture with each network of 10 layers by modifying the deep residual neural network. The proposed model is trained on a training set and evaluated on a test set. The multi-view deep learning fusion model achieved the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.991, accuracy of 0.965 and F1-Score of 0.970 in test set. We compared the performance of the mini-architecture with other lightweight networks on the same Sinus CT dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that the developed ResMini architecture contribute to competitive CRSwNP endotype identification modeling in terms of accuracy and parameter number.

Metabolic syndrome facilitates histopathological changes and the risk of postoperative recurrence in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

The relationship between metabolic syndrome (MS) and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the effects of MS on histopathological features and postoperative recurrence in patients with CRSwNP.

METHODS

We recruited 529 patients with CRSwNP who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery. They were divided into MS and non-MS groups and followed up for 2 years to evaluate postoperative recurrence. Clinical characteristics, histopathological features, the immunoactivity of signature cytokines, and the risk of postoperative recurrence were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In total, 490 patients with CRSwNP were included in the study, 145 of whom experienced postoperative recurrence. The recurrence rate, tissue eosinophil count and percentage, and expression levels of IL-5 and IL-17A were significantly higher in the MS group compared to the non-MS group. Furthermore, within the MS group, patients who experienced recurrence exhibited higher tissue eosinophil counts and IL-5 and IL-17A levels than those in the non-MS group. Notably, the eosinophil count and IL-5 and IL-17A levels were higher in tissues collected during revision surgery than in those collected during primary surgery, particularly in patients with MS. Binary logistic regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves consistently indicated that MS independently increased the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with CRSwNP. Furthermore, the risk increased with the number of MS components presented.

CONCLUSION

MS promoted tissue eosinophil infiltration, and IL-5 and IL-17A expression, and increased the risk of postoperative recurrence in patients with CRSwNP. MS was identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative recurrence, and the risk increased with an increase in the number of MS components.

Remission in Type 2 Inflammatory Diseases: Current Evidence, Unmet Needs, and Suggestions for Defining Remission in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The development of biological therapies for type 2 inflammatory diseases raises the possibility of addressing remission in those dis-immune conditions. No consensus exists for a definition of remission in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). This review aims to critically evaluate the published data to provide the basis for defining remission in CRSwNP.

RECENT FINDINGS

The published evidence has yet to provide an unequivocal definition on remission in type 2 inflammatory diseases, in part reflecting differences in approaches to diagnosis and follow-up. A multidimensional evaluation is necessary when considering complete remission, including clinical, inflammatory, and histologic criteria, but how to combine or tailor the three perspectives according to disease severity at baseline or timing of assessment of treatment category is yet to reach consensus. We suggest defining remission starting from the approach taken in asthma and eosinophilic esophagitis, that is, including the resolution of symptoms and improvements in objective parameters of disease severity and/or inflammatory activity. Future studies and consensuses should provide validated criteria with cutoffs for the day-to-day definition of remission. The definition of remission in CRSwNP should include the following criteria, to be verified and maintained for a period of ≥ 12 months: absence of symptoms (nasal obstruction, loss of smell, rhinorrhea as the main ones); no impact of symptoms on quality of life; no need of surgery; no chronic or rescue medications (systemic corticosteroids or antibiotics); and recovery of smell function, possibly evaluated by objective test. Assessment of underlying inflammation should also be considered once accurate and feasible biomarkers are available in clinical practice.

Olfactory cleft mucus eosinophil-derived neurotoxin better reflects olfactory loss than blood eosinophil counts in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Eosinophils are associated with olfactory dysfunction in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) is a sensitive marker of intense eosinophil activation. This study aimed to analyze olfactory cleft mucus and olfactory mucosa EDN levels and their association with olfactory dysfunction in CRS.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 150 patients with CRS electing endoscopic sinus surgery and 25 healthy controls. Both superior turbinate biopsy specimens and olfactory cleft mucus were collected to analyze EDN levels. Sniffin' Sticks test scores, olfactory cleft computed tomography (CT) scores, and olfactory cleft endoscopy scale (OCES) were obtained. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to analyze the predictability of EDN levels for olfactory dysfunction in CRS.

RESULTS

Chronic rhinosinusitis with olfactory dysfunction presented significantly higher olfactory mucosa (p = 0.016) and olfactory cleft mucus (p < 0.001) EDN levels than CRS without olfactory dysfunction. Mucus EDN levels were positively correlated with blood eosinophils (r = 0.625, p = 0.002), olfactory cleft CT scores (r = 0.738, p < 0.001), and OCES (r = 0.605, p = 0.004) in CRS. Furthermore, mucus EDN levels were significantly negatively correlated with threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI) (r = -0.688), olfactory threshold (r = -0.606), olfactory discrimination (r = -0.608), and olfactory identification (r = -0.697) scores. After adjusting for patient demographics and comorbidities, mucus EDN levels were significantly associated with olfactory dysfunction in CRS (odds ratio = 2.162; p = 0.027). Mucus EDN levels showed a significantly better performance for predicting olfactory dysfunction than blood eosinophil counts (area under the curve, 0.873 vs. 0.764, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Olfactory cleft mucus EDN level may be a better biomarker for predicting olfactory dysfunction in CRS than blood eosinophil counts.

Clinically meaningful changes in efficacy outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) carries a high disease burden, and many studies have been done investigating the efficacy of various medical and surgical therapies. However, outcome metrics have varied across these studies, making it difficult to compare therapeutic efficacy on a large scale. In this article, we discuss various outcome metrics used across prior studies as well as the relationship between these measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Outcome metrics in CRSwNP studies include both clinically assessed and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). The former includes olfaction testing, scoring systems based on imaging and endoscopic evaluation, and histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation of sinus tissue, and the latter includes quality-of-life instruments, symptom severity scales, and disease-control instruments. Recent studies evaluating the efficacy of new biologics have used a combination of both types of metrics.

SUMMARY

Both clinical metrics and patient-reported outcomes provide utility in evaluating disease severity and control in patients with CRSwNP, although there are nuances when comparing therapies in this population as patients with CRSwNP are heterogeneous and may have symptoms across several domains. However, PROMs in conjunction with clinical metrics provide useful information to assess patient symptoms and response to interventions.

Evaluating enrollment and outcome criteria in trials of biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

OBJECTIVE

Treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) generally involves intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) and saline irrigation, followed by short courses of systemic corticosteroids (SCS) or surgery with postoperative medical therapy for patients who do not respond to INCS. However, both SCS use and surgery are associated with a range of adverse effects or complications, have a high recurrence rate, and are unsuitable for some patients. Biologics targeting the underlying pathophysiology are promising treatment alternatives for these patients. Dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab are approved for use in patients with severe, uncontrolled CRSwNP. However, the lack of a consistent definition of severe CRSwNP makes the decision to initiate biologic treatment particularly complex. Furthermore, the position of each biologic in the overall management of CRSwNP remains to be clarified.

DATA SOURCES

Publications reporting results of phase III trials of dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab in the treatment of CRSwNP.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Randomized, controlled phase III trials of biologics approved for CRSwNP.

RESULTS

These trials all used different enrollment criteria. We discuss the complexities of assessing CRSwNP disease severity and highlight how these impact comparisons of the populations and outcomes of the phase III biologic trials.

CONCLUSION

To position biologic agents appropriately within the existing CRSwNP treatment paradigm, future trials will need to include comparable patient populations and standardized outcome measures. Such trials will help to ensure that biologic treatment is targeted appropriately to support optimal clinical outcomes.