1
|
Dölle-Bierke S, Worm M. Reply to "Correct nomenclature of wheat allergy dependent on augmentation factors". THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:3563-3564. [PMID: 37945214 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Dölle-Bierke
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Margitta Worm
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Skypala IJ, Reese I, Durban R, Hunter H, Podesta M, Chaddad MCC, Santos AF, Agache I. Food allergy-A holistic approach to dietary management. A joint EAACI Research & Outreach Committee and INDANA review. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2023; 34:e14019. [PMID: 37747742 DOI: 10.1111/pai.14019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Following a diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy, to secure the best outcome, the patient should receive individualized advice tailored to their specific needs, which considers the type and presentation of the food involved, level of exclusion required, risk of cross-contamination and any variance required for age, ethnicity, financial issues, and lifestyle. Issues such as food labels "may contain" statements, and variation in the threshold of reaction and impact of cofactors should also be considered. Most important is the need to ensure that the diagnosis is robust, especially given the nutritional, psychological, and socioeconomic issues that can affect an individual with a diagnosis of food allergy. Unnecessary exclusion of one or more foods that have not triggered allergic reactions, especially in individuals with allergic comorbidities, can result in severe IgE-mediated reactions on re-exposure. Given that food allergies may change over time, the diagnosis should be reviewed, to determine whether resolution is likely, or new-food triggers are reported. Regular assessment is vital, especially during childhood, to ensure reintroduction occurs at an appropriate time, thus enabling increased diversity of the diet and improvement in the quality of life. For some, an IgE-mediated food allergy may necessitate the life-long exclusion of foods, and for others, a food habitually eaten suddenly triggers an allergic reaction in adult life. People of all ages, ethnicities, and socioeconomic backgrounds deserve individual advice on the management of their food allergy to support a healthy diet and improve quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel J Skypala
- Department of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, part of Guys & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Inflammation, Repair & Development Section, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Imke Reese
- Nutritional Counseling and Therapy, Focus on Allergology, Munich, Germany
| | - Raquel Durban
- Carolina Asthma & Allergy Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hannah Hunter
- Department of Allergy, Guys & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Kings College, London, UK
| | | | | | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dölle-Bierke S, Höfer V, Francuzik W, Näher AF, Bilo MB, Cichocka-Jarosz E, Lopes de Oliveira LC, Fernandez-Rivas M, García BE, Hartmann K, Jappe U, Köhli A, Lange L, Maris I, Mustakov TB, Nemat K, Ott H, Papadopoulos NG, Pföhler C, Ruëff F, Sabouraud-Leclerc D, Spindler T, Stock P, Treudler R, Vogelberg C, Wagner N, Worm M. Food-Induced Anaphylaxis: Data From the European Anaphylaxis Registry. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:2069-2079.e7. [PMID: 36990430 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food is one of the most common elicitors of anaphylaxis, with an increasing incidence over recent years. OBJECTIVES To characterize elicitor-specific phenotypes and identify factors enhancing the risk or severity of food-induced anaphylaxis (FIA). METHODS We analyzed data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry applying an age- and sex-matched analysis of associations (Cramer's V) for single food triggers and calculated odds ratios (ORs) for severe FIA. RESULTS We identified 3,427 cases of confirmed FIA showing an age-dependent elicitor ranking (for children: peanut, cow's milk, cashew, and hen's egg; and for adults: wheat flour, shellfish, hazelnut, and soy). The age- and sex-matched analysis revealed defined symptom patterns for wheat and cashew. Wheat-induced anaphylaxis was more frequently associated with cardiovascular symptoms (75.7%; Cramer's V = 0.28) and cashew-induced anaphylaxis with gastrointestinal symptoms (73.9%; Cramer's V = 0.20). Furthermore, concomitant atopic dermatitis was slightly associated with anaphylaxis to hen's egg (Cramer's V = 0.19) and exercise was strongly associated with anaphylaxis to wheat (Cramer's V = 0.56). Additional factors influencing the severity were alcohol intake in wheat anaphylaxis (OR = 3.23; CI, 1.31-8.83) and exercise in peanut anaphylaxis (OR = 1.78; CI, 1.09-2.95). CONCLUSIONS Our data show that FIA is age-dependent. In adults, the range of elicitors inducing FIA is broader. For some elicitors, the severity of FIA seems to be related to the elicitor. These data require confirmation in future studies considering a clear differentiation between augmentation and risk factors in FIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Dölle-Bierke
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Veronika Höfer
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Wojciech Francuzik
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany
| | - Anatol-Fiete Näher
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Division of Information and Research Data Management, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maria Beatrice Bilo
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università, Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine/Allergy Unit, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Ewa Cichocka-Jarosz
- Department of Pediatrics, Pulmonology-Allergology-Dermatology Clinic, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Lucila C Lopes de Oliveira
- Division of Allergy, Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Blanca E García
- Allergology Service. Hospital Universitario de Navarra. Pamplona, Spain
| | - Karin Hartmann
- Division of Allergy, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Biomedicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Uta Jappe
- Division of Clinical and Molecular Allergology, Research Center Borstel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Borstel, Germany; Interdisciplinary Outpatient Clinic, Department of Pneumology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Alice Köhli
- Division of Allergology, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland; Division of Paediatric Allergology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Lars Lange
- Department of Pediatrics, GFO-Kliniken Bonn, St Marien-Hospital, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ioana Maris
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University College Cork/Bon Secours Hospital Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Katja Nemat
- Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Kinderzentrum Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Dresden, Germany; University Allergy Center Dresden, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Hagen Ott
- Division of Pediatric Dermatology and Allergology, Children's Hospital Auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Claudia Pföhler
- Saarland University Medical Center, Department of Dermatology, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Franziska Ruëff
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Regina Treudler
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology, and Allergology, University Leipzig Medical Faculty, Leipzig Interdisciplinary Allergy Centre-CAC, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Vogelberg
- Division of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergology, Department of Pediatrics, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Nicola Wagner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Margitta Worm
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Turner PJ, Patel N, Blumchen K, Berkes S, Sampson HA, Beyer K. Impact of using less objective symptoms to define tolerated dose during food challenges: A data-driven approach. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023; 152:145-154. [PMID: 36603776 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.12.818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food challenges (FCs) form the basis for assessing efficacy outcomes in interventional studies of food allergy; however, different studies have used a variety of similar but not identical criteria to define a challenge reaction, including subjective (nonobjective) symptoms occurring in a single-organ system as dose limiting. OBJECTIVE Our aim was to undertake a secondary analysis of 4 interventional studies to assess the impact of using less objective criteria to determine challenge-stop on reaction thresholds and their reproducibility. METHODS We analyzed individual participant data, including individual participant data meta-analysis, by using 3 different published challenge-stop criteria: (1) PRACTALL consesus criteria; (2) Consortium for Food Allergy Research version 3 (CoFAR v3) with at least 1 moderate- or severe-grade symptom; or (3) CoFAR v3 with at least 2 mild symptoms occurring in different organ systems. Reproducibility of challenge threshold was also assessed in participants undergoing subsequent repeat FCs. RESULTS Four studies, with detailed challenge data from a total of 592 participants, were included. Applying CoFAR v3 definitions for dose-limiting symptoms resulted in an underestimate of reaction thresholds compared with those in PRACTALL (P < .001) that is equivalent to almost a single dosing increment when using a semi-log dosing regimen. Reproducibility was also reduced when applying CoFAR v3 (P < .001 [n = 223]). Using the least conservative interpretation of CoFAR v3 (≥2 mild symptoms occurring in different systems) resulted in a significant overestimate of 15% when assessing oral immunotherapy efficacy. Applying a data-driven minor modification to CoFAR v3 resulted in a new set of challenge-stop criteria with validity similar to that of PRACTALL but one that is simpler to implement and in which significant gastrointestinal discomfort with observable decreased activity remains a dose-limiting symptom. CONCLUSION The use of less objective symptoms to define challenge-stop compromises the reproducibility of the FC as a tool to assess efficacy outcomes in interventional studies, and potentially overestimates the efficacy of the intervention tested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Turner
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Nandinee Patel
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katharina Blumchen
- Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Pneumology, Allergology and Cystic Fibrosis, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Stefanie Berkes
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hugh A Sampson
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Kirsten Beyer
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universtãtsmedizin Berlin, Berlin Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Despite no global consensus on a definition of anaphylaxis, there is increasing recognition that just as allergic reactions lie on a spectrum of severity, the same is for anaphylaxis. A variety of severity scores exist in the literature. We review the approaches taken to develop these scores, and their relative advantages and disadvantages. RECENT FINDINGS There have been four recent comparisons of published severity scores. All have highlighted the heterogeneity between scoring systems, and the lack of transferability from one approach to another. Notably, only one score has been developed using a data-driven approach, and none has undergone formal and comprehensive validation. SUMMARY It is unclear whether a single severity score is achievable, or indeed desirable. If the aim is to guide management of acute reactions, then assignment of severity is not only unnecessary but might delay treatment and cause harm. Severity scores are needed in the research setting, but require an approach which can discriminate between reactions of similar but nonidentical severity (particularly, nonanaphylaxis reactions). Any approach should be fit for purpose, informed by patient and clinician experience, and ideally be data-driven to minimize subjective bias and facilitate objective validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisling Stafford
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Paul J Turner
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|