Combined Resection of the Liver and Pancreas for Malignancy

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for advanced biliary malignancies

BACKGROUND

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) has been considered the only curative treatment for metastatic cholangiocarcinoma and some locally advanced gallbladder cancers (GBCs). However, HPD has not yet been included in treatment guidelines as a standard surgical procedure in consideration of its morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of HPD in treating biliary malignancies.

METHODS

The medical records of 57 patients with advanced biliary cancer undergoing HPD from January 2009 to December 2019 were retrospectively retrieved. A case-control analysis was conducted at our department. Patients with advanced GBC who underwent HPD (HPD-GBC group) were compared with a control group (None-HPD-GBC group). Baseline characteristics, preoperative treatments, tumor pathologic features, operative results, and prognosis were assessed.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients with cholangiocarcinoma and 44 patients with GBC underwent HPD at our department. Significant postoperative complications (grade III or greater) and postoperative pancreatic fistula were observed in 24 (42.1%) and 15 (26.3%) patients, respectively. One postoperative death occurred in the present study. Overall survival (OS) was longer in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma than in those with GBC (median survival time [MST], 31 months vs . 11 months; P   <  0.001). In the subgroup analysis of patients with advanced GBC, multivariate analysis demonstrated that T4 stage tumors ( P  = 0.012), N2 tumors ( P  = 0.001), and positive margin status ( P  = 0.004) were independently associated with poorer OS. Patients with either one or more prognostic factors exhibited a shorter MST than patients without those prognostic factors ( P  < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

HPD could be performed with a relatively low mortality rate and an acceptable morbidity rate in an experienced high- volume center. For patients with advanced GBC without an N2 or T4 tumor, HPD can be a preferable treatment option.

Molecular diagnostics and biomarkers in cholangiocarcinoma

Regardless of anatomic origin, cholangiocarcinoma is generally an aggressive malignancy with a relatively high case fatality. Surgical resection with curative intent remains the best opportunity to achieve meaningful long-term survival. Most patients present, however, with advanced disease and less than 20% of patients are candidates for surgical resection. Unfortunately, even patients who undergo resection have a 5-year survival that ranges from 20 to 40%. Biomarkers are indicators of normal, pathologic, or biologic responses to an intervention and can range from a characteristic (i.e., blood pressure reading which can detect hypertension) to specific genetic mutations or proteins (i.e., carcinoembryonic antigen level). Novel biomarkers and improved molecular diagnostics represent an attractive opportunity to improve detection as well as to identify novel therapeutic targets for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. We herein review the latest advances in molecular diagnostics and biomarkers related to the early detection and treatment of patients with cholangiocarcinoma.

Safety and Outcomes of Combined Pancreatic and Hepatic Resections for Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Background

Approximately 40–50% of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) initially present with distant metastases. Little is known about the outcomes of patients undergoing combined pancreatic and hepatic resections for this indication.

Methods

Patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic pNETs at Mayo Clinic Rochester from 2000 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Major pancreatectomy was defined as pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy, and major hepatectomy as right hepatectomy or trisegmentectomy. Characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent pancreatectomy with simultaneous hepatectomy were compared with those of patients who underwent isolated hepatectomy (with or without prior history of pancreatectomy).

Results

205 patients who underwent hepatectomy for metastatic pNETs were identified: 131 underwent pancreatectomy with simultaneous hepatectomy and 74 underwent isolated hepatectomy. Among patients undergoing simultaneous hepatectomy, 89 patients underwent minor pancreatectomy with minor hepatectomy, 11 patients underwent major pancreatectomy with minor hepatectomy, 30 patients underwent minor pancreatectomy with major hepatectomy, and 1 patient underwent major pancreatectomy with major hepatectomy. Patients undergoing simultaneous hepatectomy had more numerous liver lesions (10 or more lesions in 54% vs. 34%, p = 0.008), but the groups were otherwise similar. Rates of any major complications (31% versus 24%, p = 0.43), hepatectomy-specific complications such as bile leak, hemorrhage, and liver failure (0.8–7.6% vs. 1.4–12%, p = 0.30–0.99), and 90-day mortality (1.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.62) were similar between the two groups. 5-year overall survival was 64% after combined resections and 65% after isolated hepatectomy (p = 0.93).

Conclusion

For patients with metastatic pNETs, combined pancreatic and hepatic resections can be performed with acceptable morbidity and mortality in selected patients at high-volume institutions.

Laparoscopic hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for synchronous gallbladder cancer and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report

Background

Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) is one of the most complex procedures, and it is very rarely reported. Laparoscopic HPD (LHPD) is even rarer. To date, there are only 3 reports of LHPD for locally advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC) or extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC). This is the first report of LHPD for synchronous GBC and ECC.

Case presentation

A 75-year-old female patient complained of jaundice for 2 weeks without fever or abdominal pain. She was diagnosed with synchronous GBC and ECC. After a comprehensive preparation, she underwent a laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and resection of hepatic segments of IVb and V, and her digestive tract reconstruction followed Child’s methods. She was discharged on the 12th day postoperatively without pancreatic leakage, biliary leakage, or liver failure.

Conclusions

LHPD is safe and feasible for selected cases of GBCs or ECCs.

Liver regeneration biology: Implications for liver tumour therapies

The liver has remarkable regenerative potential, with the capacity to regenerate after 75% hepatectomy in humans and up to 90% hepatectomy in some rodent models, enabling it to meet the challenge of diverse injury types, including physical trauma, infection, inflammatory processes, direct toxicity, and immunological insults. Current understanding of liver regeneration is based largely on animal research, historically in large animals, and more recently in rodents and zebrafish, which provide powerful genetic manipulation experimental tools. Whilst immensely valuable, these models have limitations in extrapolation to the human situation. In vitro models have evolved from 2-dimensional culture to complex 3 dimensional organoids, but also have shortcomings in replicating the complex hepatic micro-anatomical and physiological milieu. The process of liver regeneration is only partially understood and characterized by layers of complexity. Liver regeneration is triggered and controlled by a multitude of mitogens acting in autocrine, paracrine, and endocrine ways, with much redundancy and cross-talk between biochemical pathways. The regenerative response is variable, involving both hypertrophy and true proliferative hyperplasia, which is itself variable, including both cellular phenotypic fidelity and cellular trans-differentiation, according to the type of injury. Complex interactions occur between parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells, and regeneration is affected by the status of the liver parenchyma, with differences between healthy and diseased liver. Finally, the process of termination of liver regeneration is even less well understood than its triggers. The complexity of liver regeneration biology combined with limited understanding has restricted specific clinical interventions to enhance liver regeneration. Moreover, manipulating the fundamental biochemical pathways involved would require cautious assessment, for fear of unintended consequences. Nevertheless, current knowledge provides guiding principles for strategies to optimise liver regeneration potential.

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy With Delayed Division of the Pancreatic Parenchyma: A Novel Technique for Reducing Pancreatic Fistula

Objectives

To review our novel technique of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) with delayed division of the pancreatic parenchyma (DDPP) for reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF).

Background

The high operative morbidity and mortality rates after HPD remains a major issue. One of the most troublesome complications is POPF, which might possibly be caused by peripancreatic saponification due to long interval between pancreas resection and reconstruction, as most surgeons prefer a caudocranial approach, performing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) first and then hepatectomy (conventional HPD [C-HPD]).

Methods

A review of the patients undergoing C-HPD and HPD with DDPP was performed. Postoperative outcomes were compared. Multivariable analysis was conducted to evaluate the risk factors of POPF after HPD.

Results

One-hundred two patients comprised of 50 patients undergoing C-HPD and 52 patients undergoing HPD with DDPP. The interval between pancreas resection and reconstruction was significantly shorter in HPD with DDPP group than in C-HPD group (51 vs 263 minutes; P < 0.001). The incidence of POPF was significantly lower in HPD with DDPP group than in C-HPD group (32.7% vs 77.3%; P < 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay was shorter in patients undergoing HPD with DDPP than in those undergoing C-HPD (32 vs 45 days). A multivariate analysis revealed that body mass index >24 kg/m2 and conventional (PD first) procedure were significant risk factors for POPF after HPD.

Conclusions

A novel technique of HPD with DDPP is a simple procedure and the optimal treatment choice to reduce the risk of developing POPF after this extensive surgery.

Safety and Oncological Benefit of Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for Advanced Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma with Horizontal Tumor Spread: Shinshu University Experience

BACKGROUND

Although hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is the only means of achieving R0 resection of widespread extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, its safety and oncological benefit remain controversial because of its inherent high risk of mortality and morbidity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze short- and long-term outcomes and evaluate the safety and oncological benefit of this advanced procedure.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 37 consecutive patients who had undergone major HPD. Portal vein embolization was performed before surgery in 20 (54%) patients with future remnant liver volume < 35%.

RESULTS

The median operative time and blood loss were 866 min and 1000 mL, respectively. Concomitant vascular resection was performed in five patients (14%). The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 100% and 5.4% (n = 2), respectively. Nineteen patients (51%) had major (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher) complications, the most common being intra-abdominal infection (49%) and post-hepatectomy liver failure (46%, grade B/C: 32%/5%), followed by postoperative pancreatic fistula (30%, grade B/C). R0 resection was achieved in 31 patients (84%). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83%, 48%, and 37%, respectively. In patients with R0 resection, 5-year OS was comparable between patients who had undergone major HPD and major hepatectomy alone (41% vs. 40%, p = non-significant).

CONCLUSIONS

HPD is a valid treatment option for extensive cholangiocarcinoma, offering long-term survival benefit at the cost of relatively high but acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. HPD is advocated in selected patients provided that it is considered possible to achieve R0 resection.

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy -a controversial treatment for bile duct and gallbladder cancer from a European perspective

BACKGROUND

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is an aggressive operation for treatment of advanced bile duct and gallbladder cancer associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality, and uncertain oncological benefit in terms of survival. Few reports on HPD from Western centers exist. The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy for HPD in European centers.

METHOD

Members of the European-African HepatoPancreatoBiliary Association were invited to report all consecutive patients operated with HPD for bile duct or gallbladder cancer between January 2003 and January 2018. The patient and tumor characteristics, perioperative and survival outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 66 patients from 19 European centers were included in the analysis. 90-day mortality rate was 17% and 13% for bile duct and gallbladder cancer respectively. All factors predictive of perioperative mortality were patient and disease-specific. The three-year overall survival excluding 90-day mortality was 80% for bile duct and 30% for gallbladder cancer (P = 0.013). In multivariable analysis R0-resection had a significant impact on overall survival.

CONCLUSION

HPD, although being associated with substantial perioperative mortality, can offer a survival benefit in patient subgroups with bile duct cancer and gallbladder cancer. To achieve negative resection margins is paramount for an improved survival outcome.

Extended liver surgery for gallbladder cancer revisited: Is there a role for hepatopancreatoduodenectomy?

Gallbladder cancer (GBCA) is a rare and fatal disease and the majority of patients presents with advanced stage. Surgical resection associated with lymphadenectomy is the only chance for cure. For patients in stages III and IV, extended resection is the only treatment to achieve R0 margins. For GBCA invading the hepatoduodenal ligament and pancreatoduodenal region, the resection of extrahepatic bile duct and pancreas is necessary. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) represents the most complex and challenging procedure in the hepatopancreatobiliary region. Kuno at the Cancer Institute Hospital Tokyo performed the first HPD in Japan in 1974 and in 1980 Takasaki presented five cases and the 30-day mortality was 60%. After that, other countries started to perform the procedure including United States and Brazil. The main complications are liver failure and pancreatic fistula. Advancements in perioperative care, surgical technique, medical instruments and postoperative at intensive care unit have resulted in reduction in morbidity and mortality. The use of portal vein embolization is indicated to increase the liver volume in patients with insufficient remnant. Preoperative biliary drainage can prevent cholangitis and improve hepatic function. This procedure should be recommended before extended HPD in jaundiced patients. Operative results with mortality rates below 5% at high volume centers suggest that HPD should be performed at centers with expertise in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

Is radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma plus partial resection of pancreatic head justified for advanced hilar cholangiocarcinoma?

BACKGROUND

To outline our experience with the radical resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) combined with the partial resection of the pancreatic head (RRHCCAPRPH) as a treatment for HCCA with distal bile duct involvement and to appraise the feasibility of this challenging procedure.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2017, 205 patients with HCCA who underwent curative surgery at our hospital were included. Among the patients, extrahepatic bile duct resection combined with hepatectomy (EBDRH), RRHCCAPRPH and hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) was performed in 168, 21 and 16 patients, respectively. Clinical pathological factors, post-operative complications and survival were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in operative blood loss, operative time, post-operative hospital stay and tumour size between EBDRH group, RRHCCAPRPH group and HPD group (P < 0.05). In terms of post-operative complications, there was no statistical difference between the three groups (P = 0.177). Further analysis showed that the incidence of pancreatic fistula (43.8%) and delayed gastric emptying (25%) after HPD were significantly higher than the other two groups. The median survival time and overall survival rate for 172 patients with R0 resection were 33 months and 85.5% at 1 year, 47.7% at 3 years, 28.4% at 5 years. Furthermore, the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates of patients with EBDRH, RRHCCAPRPH and HPD after R0 resection were 86.2%, 48.7%, 29.2%; 85.0%, 44.0%, 24.7% and 78.6%, 42.9%, 22.9%, respectively (P = 0.948).

CONCLUSION

The RRHCCAPRPH in some selected patients can actually replace HPD as a surgical treatment for HCCA with distal bile duct involvement.

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy in North America: are the outcomes acceptable?

BACKGROUND

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomies (HPD) are historically associated with high morbidity and mortality. Currently, no data with hepatopancreatobiliary-specific complications have been available for HPD in North America. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to compare the outcomes of HPD to those of major hepatectomy (MH) and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) in North America.

METHODS

The 2014-16 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for MH, PD, and HPD. Partial hepatectomies, wedge liver biopsies, distal pancreatectomies, pancreatic enucleations and total pancreatectomies were excluded. Propensity score matching was utilized to match 23 HPDs to 92 MHs and 138 PDs by 28 demographic, comorbidity, laboratory, operative and pathologic variables. Outcomes were compared among these three groups.

RESULTS

The overall morbidity and mortality for HPD were 87% and 26%, respectively, and were significantly higher (p < 0.01) compared to both MH (51%, 7.6%) and PD (52%, 1.4%). Post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) was more common (p < 0.01) in HPD patients, but pancreatic fistula rates were similar.

CONCLUSION

The morbidity and mortality after HPD are significantly higher than after MH or PD alone and may explain why HPD is performed so infrequently in North America. Centralization of HPD to a very few centers may be a strategy to improve outcomes.

Fifty-year history of biliary surgery

There has been enormous progress in the surgical treatment of biliary tract cancers in the past 50 years. In preoperative management, biliary drainage methods have changed from percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage to endoscopic nasobiliary drainage, while the advent of multidetector-row computed tomography in imaging diagnostics now enables visualization of three-dimensional anatomy, extent of cancer progression, and hepatic segment volume. Portal vein embolization has also greatly improved the safety of extended hepatectomy, and indication of extended hepatectomy can now be objectively determined with a combination of the indocyanine green test and computed tomography volumetry. In terms of surgery, combined resection and reconstruction of the portal vein and/or hepatic artery can now be safely carried out at specialized centers. Further, long-term survival can be attained with combined vascular resection if R0 resection can be achieved, even in locally advanced cancer. Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy, combined major hepatectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy, should be aggressively carried out for laterally advanced cholangiocarcinoma, whereas its indication for advanced gallbladder cancer should be carefully evaluated. Japanese surgeons have made a significant contribution to the progression of extended surgeries such as combined vascular resection and hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary tract cancer.

Major hepatectomy with or without pancreatoduodenectomy for advanced gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

The indications for major hepatectomy for gallbladder cancer either with or without pancreatoduodenectomy remain controversial. The clinical value of these extended procedures was evaluated in this study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent major hepatectomy for gallbladder cancer between 1996 and 2016 were identified from a prospectively compiled database. Postoperative outcomes and overall survival were compared between patients undergoing major hepatectomy alone or combined with pancreatoduodenectomy (HPD).

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients underwent major hepatectomy alone and 38 patients had HPD. The patients who underwent HPD were more likely to have T4 disease (P < 0·001), nodal metastasis (P = 0·015) and periaortic nodal metastasis (P = 0·006), but were less likely to receive adjuvant therapy (P = 0·006). HPD was associated with a high incidence of grade III or higher complications (P = 0·002) and death (P = 0·037). Overall survival was longer in patients who underwent major hepatectomy alone than in patients who underwent HPD (median survival time 32 versus 10 months; P < 0·001). In multivariable analysis, surgery in the early period (1996-2006) (P = 0·002), pathological T4 disease (P = 0·005) and distant metastasis (P < 0·001) were associated with shorter overall survival, and cystic duct tumour (P = 0·002) with longer overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Major hepatectomy alone for gallbladder cancer contributes to favourable overall survival with low morbidity and mortality, whereas HPD is associated with poor overall survival and high morbidity and mortality rates. HPD may eradicate locally spreading gallbladder cancer; however, the indication for the procedure is questioned from an oncological viewpoint.

Hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy for Biliary Cancer: Strategies for Near-zero Operative Mortality and Acceptable Long-term Outcome

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) for patients with biliary cancer.

BACKGROUND

HPD is thought to be the only curative treatment for widespread bile duct cancer and for some advanced cases of gallbladder cancer; however, HPD has not yet been accepted as a standard operative procedure because of concerns over morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients undergoing HPD were retrospectively reviewed. The patient and tumor characteristics, preoperative treatments, operative results, and survival outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

Preoperative biliary drainage and portal vein embolization were applied for all patients undergoing right-sided HPD or a left trisectionectomy. A major hepatectomy was performed in 42 patients, and a 2-stage pancreaticojejunostomy was selected in all the cases. The 90-day mortality was 0; however, 1 patient died because of a liver abscess 230 days after surgery. Postoperative significant complications (grade III or greater) and liver insufficiency were observed in 19 (37%) and 2 (3.8%) patients, respectively, and no abdominal bleeding events after the formation of a pancreatic fistula were encountered. The 5-year overall survival rate was 44.5%, and a significant difference was not observed between patients with bile duct cancer and those with gallbladder cancer. The operative procedure was switched to an HPD in 13 patients based on intraoperative findings, and the recurrence-free survival rate for these patients was poorer than that for patients who did not require a switch in operative procedure (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

HPD can be safely performed using the presently reported surgical strategies with acceptable short and long-term outcomes. A precise assessment of the extent of tumor spread might improve patient outcome.

Is Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy an Acceptable Operation for Biliary Cancer?

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is usually indicated for the resection of locally advanced bile duct (BD) cancer or gallbladder (GB) cancer. Previous studies have demonstrated a favorable survival rate in BD cancer patients after HPD if R0 resection is achieved. By contrast, the benefit of HPD for GB cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of GB and BD cancer after HPD. Between January 2004 and December 2013, a total of 22 patients underwent HPD for BD (n = 14) or GB cancer (n = 8). We analyzed the survival, mortality, morbidity, and prognostic factors. After HPD, the mortality rate was 4.5 per cent and the morbidity rate was 68.2 per cent. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 50.0 per cent of the patients (grade A, 40.9%; grade B, 9.1%). Liver failure did not occur. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates for BD cancer patients were 57.1, 17.9, and 17.9 per cent and those for GB cancer patients were 62.5, 25.0, and 25.0 per cent, respectively ( P = 0.768). In BD cancer, significant prognostic factors were tumor size, portal vein invasion, multiple lymph node metastases, and operation time. Furthermore, BD cancer patients with three or more of risk factors showed poorer survival than those with fewer than three risk factors. HPD for GB and BD cancer can be performed with acceptable mortality and morbidity rates. GB cancer patients who underwent HPD showed comparable survival rates compared with BD cancer patients. Long-term survival can be achieved in selected patients with BD cancer.

Resection for Klatskin tumors: technical complexities and results

Klatskin's tumors, actually-redefined as perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (phCCA) do represent 50-70% of all CCAs and develop in a context of chronic inflammation and cholestasis of bile ducts. Surgical resection provides the only chance of cure for this disease but is technically challenging because of the complex, intimate and variable relationship between biliary and vascular structures at this location. Five years survival rates range between 25-45% (median 27-58 months) in case of R0 resection and 0-23% (median 12-21 months) in case of R1 resection respectively. It should be noted that the major costs of high radicality are represented by relative high morbidity and mortality rates (i.e., 20-66% and 0-9% respectively). Considering the fact that radical resection may represent the only curative treatment of phCCA, we focused our review on surgical planning and techniques that may improve resectability rates and outcomes for locally advanced phCCA. The surgical treatment of phCCA can be successful when following aspects have been fulfilled: (I) accurate preoperative diagnostic aimed to identify the tumor in all its details (localization and extension) and to study all the risk factors influencing a posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF): i.e., liver volume, liver function, liver quality, haemodynamics and patient characteristics; (II) High end surgical skills taking in consideration the local extension of the tumor and the vascular invasion which usually require an extended hepatic resection and often a vascular resection; (III) adequate postoperative management aimed to avoid major complications (i.e., PHLF and biliary complications). These are technically challenging operations and must be performed in a high volume centres by hepato-biliary-pancreas (HBP)-surgeons with experience in microsurgical vascular techniques.

THE LARGEST WESTERN EXPERIENCE WITH HEPATOPANCREATODUODENECTOMY: LESSONS LEARNED WITH 35 CASES

Background:

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy is one of the most complex abdominal operations mainly indicated in advanced biliary carcinoma.

Aim:

To present 10-year experience performing this operation in advanced malignant tumors.

Methods:

This is a retrospective descriptive study. From 2004 to 2014, 35 hepatopancreatoduodenectomies were performed in three different institutions. The most common indication was advanced biliary carcinoma in 24 patients (68.5%).

Results:

Eighteen patients had gallbladder cancer, eight Klatskin tumors, five neuroendocrine tumors with liver metastasis, one colorectal metastasis invading the pancreatic head, one intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with liver metastasis, one gastric cancer recurrence with liver involvement and one ocular melanoma with pancreatic head and right liver lobe metastasis. All patients were submitted to pancreatoduodenectomy with a liver resection as follows: eight right trisectionectomies, five right lobectomies, four left lobectomies, 18 central lobectomies (IVb, V and VIII). The overall mortality was 34.2% (12/35) and the overall morbidity rate was 97.4%.

Conclusion:

Very high mortality is seen when major liver resection is performed with pancreatoduodenectomy, including right lobectomy and trisectionectomy. Liver failure in combination with a pancreatic leak is invariably lethal. Efforts to ensure a remnant liver over 40-50% of the total liver volume are the key to obtain patient survival.

Clinical epidemiological survey of gallbladder carcinoma in northwestern China, 2009-2013: 2379 cases in 17 centers

Objective

To analyze the clinical epidemiological characteristics of patients with gallbladder carcinoma recruited from 17 hospitals in five northwestern provinces of China (Shaanxi Province, Gansu Province, Qinghai Province, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, and Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region) from 2009 to 2013, and to summarize the clinical diagnosis and treatment data of gallbladder carcinoma.

Methods

Clinical information of 2379 patients with gallbladder carcinoma from 17 hospitals in five northwestern provinces of China was retrospectively collected and analyzed using the “Questionnaire for Gallbladder Carcinoma Patients in Northwestern Area of China.” All information was verified with EpiData software and analyzed with SPSS 13.0 software.

Results

(1) Gallbladder carcinoma accounted for 2.7% (2379/86,609) of all biliary tract diseases during the study period, which was significantly higher than that from 1986 to 1998 (P < 0.001). (2) Gallbladder carcinoma was more prone to occur in elderly women. The male:female incidence ratio was 1.0:2.1, the average age of onset of disease was 63.7 ± 11.3 years, and the incidence was higher in farmers than in other occupational groups. (3) A total of 57.2% (1360/2379) of patients with gallbladder carcinoma also had gallstones. (4) Abdominal pain (1796/2379, 75.5%) and jaundice (727/2379, 30.6%) were the most common clinical manifestations, 81.2% (1527/1881) were positive in those receiving B ultrasound examinations and 90.7% (1567/1727) were positive in those undergoing computed tomography, and 64.5% (1124/1742) of patients with gallbladder carcinoma were positive for carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9. (5) The pathological type of gallbladder carcinoma was mainly moderately and poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with a high degree of malignancy. At admission, 55.1% (1091/1981) of patients had stage IV cancer among patients with TNM staging information; 55.9% (1331/2379) had lymphatic metastasis, 29.7% (706/2379) had bile duct metastasis, and 53.1% (1263/2379) had liver metastasis. (6) A total of 283 patients (283/2379, 11.9%) had incidentally detected gallbladder carcinoma. (7) The rate of radical surgical resection was 30.4% (723/2379).

Conclusion

The proportion of gallbladder carcinoma in biliary tract diseases in the northwestern area of China was significantly higher from 2009 to 2013 than from 1986 to 1998. Gallbladder carcinoma was common in older women and mainly diagnosed at an advanced stage. Compared with other surveys in different regions, the rate of metastasis in this survey was high, leading to a low resection rate. Populations at high risk should undergo B-ultrasound examinations at regular follow-up intervals to increase the rate of early diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma.

Outcome and complications of combined liver and pancreas resections: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Combined resections of the liver and pancreas are related to high complication and mortality rates. The present study assessed the outcome of these procedures and identified specific risk factors for morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and April 2012, 28 combined liver/pancreas resections were performed at our institution. All patients were retrospectively analysed using a database with regards to baseline characteristics, surgical procedures, complications and survival.

RESULTS

Among the pancreatic resections, there were 12 (42.9%) Kausch-Whipple (KW), 9 (32.1%) pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD), 6 (21.4%) distal pancreatectomies (DP) and 1 (3.6%) total pancreaticoduodenectomy (TPD). In 12 (48.9%) cases, major complications (grade IIIb-V) were observed. Overall survival was 35 months (SD = 40.5) and the 3-year survival rate was 35.7% (1-year survival rate: 50%).

DISCUSSION

Combined resections of the liver and pancreas are associated with high complication rates, especially if major liver resections are performed. Therefore, it is mandatory to do a thorough evaluation of potential patients.

The diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary hepatic tumor in Germany, with about 3500 new cases per year. In recent years, its prognosis has improved because of wider resections and the establishment of local treatment and chemotherapy in the palliative situation.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent articles that were retrieved by a selective literature search in the PubMed database with the keywords "cholangiocarcinoma AND diagnostic OR therapy." Articles in English or German published up to January 2014 were considered.

RESULTS

The sole curative treatment for CCA is surgery, but 40-85% of all patients have recurrent disease even after radical excision. Because of this high recurrence rate, adjuvant treatments are now under intense discussion. For unresectable CCA without distant metastases, small case series have shown that liver transplantation can yield promising survival rates of over 50% at 5 years. For many patients with CCA, however, only palliative treatments can be offered, including endoscopic clearing of the biliary pathways. Because of the low prevalence of the disease, there have been only a few phase 3 studies of palliative chemotherapy for CCA. On the basis of one positive phase 3 study, chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin is considered the standard and now plays an established role in palliative care.

CONCLUSION

CCA presents a special challenge in gastroenterology, oncology, and visceral surgery because of the difficulty in establishing the diagnosis, local complications in the biliary pathways, and a high recurrence rate after resection. Future studies should address not only the role of adjuvant chemotherapy, but also the efficacy of combined local and systemic treatment.

Major hepatopancreatoduodenectomy with simultaneous resection of the hepatic artery for advanced biliary cancer

BACKGROUND

Major hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) with simultaneous resection of the hepatic artery (HA) for biliary cancer is the most extended surgery for obtaining curative resection, and its clinical significance is unclear. The aim of this study was to appraise the clinical value of this extended procedure as a treatment for biliary cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 38 patients with biliary cancer who underwent major HPD from 1994 to 2014. Clinicopathological factors and survival following HPD were compared between patients with and without simultaneous resection of the HA.

RESULTS

Of the 38 study patients, 12 patients (32 %) underwent major HPD with HA. There was no significant difference in major complications between the two groups. The overall 2-year survival rate and the median survival time following major HPD with HA were 71 % and 42.3 months. The survival of the patients with gallbladder cancer was significantly worse than that of the patients with bile duct cancer (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Major HPD with simultaneous resection of the HA can be a preferable treatment option for bile duct cancer that offers acceptable perioperative morbidity and mortality, as well as long-term survival. However, this procedure for gallbladder cancer should not be performed.

Resection of colorectal liver metastases and extra-hepatic disease: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis of survival outcomes

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for 9.7% of all cancers with 1.4 million new cases diagnosed each year. 19-31% of CRC patients develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), and 23-38% develop extra-hepatic disease (EHD). The aim of this systematic review was to determine overall survival (OS) in patients resected for CRLM and known EHD.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken to identify studies reporting OS after resection for CRLM in the presence of EHD. Proportional meta-analyses and relative risk of death before five years were assessed between patient groups.

RESULTS

A total of 15,144 patients with CRLM (2308 with EHD) from 52 studies were included. Three and 5-year OS were 58% and 26% for lung, 37% and 17% for peritoneum, and 35% and 15% for lymph nodes, respectively. The combined relative risk of death by five years was 1.49 (95% CI = 1.34-1.66) for lung, 1.59 (95% CI = 1.16-2.17) for peritoneal and 1.70 (95% CI = 1.57-1.84) for lymph node EHD, in favour of resection in the absence of EHD.

CONCLUSION

This review supports attempts at R0 resection in selected patients and rejects the notion that EHD is an absolute contraindication to resection.

A systematic review of safety and efficacy of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary and gallbladder cancers

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence on the safety and efficacy of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary and gallbladder cancers.

METHODS

Medline and EMBASE were systematically searched for papers of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy in patients with biliary and gallbladder cancers.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies involving 397 patients were reviewed. Major hepatectomy was undertaken in 81.3% of the 397 patients and the R0 resection rate was 71.3%. The morbidity and mortality rates were 78.9% and 10.3%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate ranged from 3% to 50% (median = 31%). The 5-year survival rate in patients who underwent curative resection was 18-68.8% (median = 51.3%), and 0% in patients who received non-curative resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy is a challenging procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. However, this procedure can provide a chance of long-term survival in patients in whom curative resection is feasible.

A systematic review of the safety and efficacy of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary and gallbladder cancers

OBJECTIVES

To review the evidence on the safety and efficacy of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary and gallbladder cancers.

METHODS

Medline and EMBASE were systematically searched for papers describing hepatopancreatoduodenectomy in patients with biliary and gallbladder cancers.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies involving 397 patients were reviewed. A major hepatectomy was undertaken in 81.3% of the 397 patients, and the R0 resection rate was 71.3%. The morbidity and mortality rates were 78.9% and 10.3%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate ranged from 3% to 50% (median = 31%). The 5-year survival rate in patients who underwent a curative resection was 18-68.8% (median = 51.3%), and 0% in patients who received a non-curative resection.

CONCLUSIONS

A hepatopancreatoduodenectomy is a challenging procedure with high morbidity and mortality rates. However, this procedure can provide a chance of long-term survival in patients in whom a curative resection is feasible.

Hepato-pancreatectomy: how morbid? Results from the national surgical quality improvement project

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous resection of both the liver and the pancreas carries significant complexity. The objective of this study was to investigate peri-operative outcomes after a synchronous hepatectomy and pancreatectomy (SHP).

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried to identify patients who underwent SHP. Resections were categorized as '< hemihepatectomy', '≥ hemihepatectomy' (hemihepatectomy and trisectionectomy), 'PD' (pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy) and 'distal' (distal pancreatectomy and enucleation).

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2013, 480 patients underwent SHP. Patients were stratified based on the extent of resection: '< hemihepatectomy + distal (n = 224)', '≥ hemihepatectomy + distal' (n = 49), '< hemihepatectomy + PD' (n = 83) and '≥ hemihepatectomy + PD' (n = 24). Although the first three groups had a reasonable and comparable safety profile (morbidity 33-51% and mortality 0-6.6%), the '≥ hemihepatectomy + PD' group was associated with an 87.5% morbidity (organ space infection 58.3%, re-intubation 12.5%, reoperation 25% and septic shock 25%), 8.3% 30-day mortality and 18.2% in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

A synchronous hemihepatectomy (or trisectionectomy) with PD remains a highly morbid combination and should be reserved for patients who have undergone extremely cautious selection.

Central hepatectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy for diffusely spread bile duct cancer

BACKGROUND

Major hepatectomy with concomitant pancreatoduodenectomy (major-HPD) is the only procedure that provides a curative resection for diffusely spread extrahepatic bile duct cancer (DSEBDC). We sometimes encounter patients who cannot undergo major-HPD because of a poor functional hepatic reserve. The aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility of central hepatectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy (central-HPD) for patients with DSEBDC as an alternative to major-HPD.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2010, six patients with DSEBDC underwent central-HPD. The hepatectomy procedures for central-HPD included central bisectionectomy with S1 resection (S1r) and right anterior sectionectomy with S1r.

RESULTS

The estimated resection liver volume was decreased from 77.5% to 46.6% by the application of central-HPD. The median operative duration was 929 min, and the median blood loss was 2568 ml. Postoperative complications were observed in five patients. The proximal ductal stump was histologically positive with non-invasive cancer in three patients and positive with invasive cancer in one. The overall survival of the six patients was 62.5% at 5 years after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

While central-HPD was a technically complicated procedure associated with a high morbidity rate, it offered a favorable overall survival and might be an alternative option for DSEBDC patients with a poor hepatic functional reserve.

The benefits of liver resection for non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Defining the benefits of resection of isolated non-colorectal, non-neuroendocrine (NCRNNE) liver metastases is difficult. To better understand the survival benefit in this group of patients, we conducted a systematic review of the previous literature.

METHODS

Medline, Web of Knowledge, and manual searches were performed using search terms, such as "liver resection" and "primary tumor." Inclusion criteria were year>1990, >five patients, and median survival reported or derived. An expected median survival was calculated from weighted averages of median survivals, and differences were assessed using a permutation test.

RESULTS

A total of 7,857 references were identified. Overall 4,735 abstracts were reviewed; 120 manuscripts evaluated and of these, 73 met the study inclusion criteria. The final population consisted of 3,596 patients with renal (n=234), ovarian (n=119), testicular (n=153), adrenal (n=90), small bowel (n=28), gallbladder (n=21), duodenum (n=38), gastric (n=481), pancreatic (n=55), esophageal (n=23), head and neck (n=15), and lung (n=36) cancers, gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) (n=106), cholangiocarcinoma (n=13), sarcoma (n=189), and melanoma (n=643). The greatest expected median was 63 months for genitourinary (GU) primaries (n=549; range 5.4-142 months) followed by 44.4 months for breast cancer (n=1,013; range 8-74 months), 22.3 months for gastrointestinal cancer (n=549; range 5-58 months), and 23.7 months for other tumor types (n=1,082; range 10-72 months). Using a permutation test, we observed that survival was best for patients with GU primaries followed by that for breast cancer patients. Additionally, we also observed that survival was similar for those with cancer of the GI tract and other primary sites.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be a benefit to resection for patients with NCRNNE liver metastases. The degree of survival advantage is predicated by primary site.

Liver transplantation for metastatic liver malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver transplantation is a validated treatment of primary hepatobiliary tumours. Over the last decade, a renewed interest for liver transplantation as a curative treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CR-LM) and neuro-endocrine metastasis (NET-LM) has developed.

RECENT FINDINGS

The ELTR and UNOS analyses showed that liver transplantation may offer excellent disease-free survival (ranging from 30 to 77%) in case of NET-LM, on the condition that stringent selection criteria are implemented. The interest for liver transplantation in the treatment of CR-LM has been fostered by the Norwegian SECA study. Five-year A 5-year survival rate of 60% could be reached. Despite the high recurrence rate (90%), one-third of patients were disease free following pulmonary surgery for metastases.

SUMMARY

Liver transplantation will take a more prominent place in the therapeutic algorithm of CR-LM and NET-LM. Larger experiences are necessary to improve knowledge about tumour biology and to refine selection criteria. A multimodal approach adding neo and adjuvant medical treatment to the transplant procedure will be key to bring this oncologic transplant project into the clinical arena. The preserved liver function in these patients will allow a more deliberate access to split liver and living donation for these indications.

Review of hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for biliary cancer: an extended radical approach of Japanese origin

Cholangiocarcinomas exhibit various modes of local extension, and some tumors can only be completely resected by hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD), which is defined as the resection of the whole extrahepatic biliary system with the adjacent liver and pancreatoduodenum. Since Takasaki et al. introduced HPD for locally advanced gallbladder cancer in 1980, Japanese hepatobiliary surgeons have aggressively challenged this extended procedure for advanced biliary tumors. Early experiences with HPD were frequently associated with liver failure and sequential mortality, leading to an underestimation of the survival benefit of HPD. However, with improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative patient care, including portal vein embolization, over the last two decades, the mortality rate after HPD has gradually decreased. Recent studies have demonstrated a favorable survival in cholangiocarcinoma, provided that R0 resection is achieved. In contrast, HPD for gallbladder cancer remains controversial because of the extremely poor survival, although the study populations have been limited. HPD can be performed with low mortality and offers a better probability of long-term survival in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. We should consider HPD to be a standard approach for laterally advanced cholangiocarcinomas that are otherwise unresectable.

Advances in liver surgery for cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the most current strategies of surgical treatment for cholangiocarcinoma including liver resection and transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

More aggressive surgical approaches have emerged over the past decade to treat patients previously considered to have unresectable lesions, which include combined hepatectomy with vascular resection, liver mass manipulation, oncological nontouch technique and liver transplantation.

SUMMARY

Cholangiocarcinoma can occur anywhere along the biliary system. Its detection rate, and consequently its incidence, has risen possibly because of improvements in diagnostic imaging. Cholangiocarcinomas are presently understood within three distinct categories: intrahepatic, perihilar and distal tumors. The perihilar type is the most common, followed by the distal and intrahepatic types. This division has therapeutic relevance because the type of surgery depends on the anatomical location and extension of the tumor. This review will primarily focus on those circumstances in which a hepatectomy is required, which provides the greatest chance of cure. In this setting, liver transplantation for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma has resurged as an excellent option for a selective group of patients, when associated with a neoadjuvant chemoradiation protocol. Despite more aggressive surgical approaches, many cases remain unresectable with a poor prognosis.

Is extended hemihepatectomy plus pancreaticoduodenectomy justified for advanced bile duct cancer and gallbladder cancer?

BACKGROUND

Major hepatopancreaticoduodenectomy (HPD) is an extensive surgical procedure offering the highest curability for patients with advanced biliary cancer. However, surgical morbidity associated with major HPD is high, and optimal indications for this procedure remain unclear.

METHODS

Between 1989 and 2010, 14 patients with widespread bile duct cancer and 5 with gallbladder cancer having biliary infiltration underwent major HPD at our hospital. Preoperative portal vein embolization was performed in 17 patients undergoing right HPD. Clinicopathologic factors and survivals following HPD were compared between patients with bile duct cancer and those with gallbladder cancer.

RESULTS

One patient who underwent right HPD for gallbladder cancer died of hepatic failure (5.3%) and 18 of the 19 patients (95%) developed postoperative pancreatic fistulas. The median hospital stay was 47 days. Depth of invasion was T3 in 1 patient and T4 in 2 patients with bile duct cancer and was T4 in all 5 patients with gallbladder cancer (P = .002). The clinical stage was IV in 3 patients (21%) with bile duct cancer and in all 5 patients with gallbladder cancer (P = .002). The 5-year survival rates and median survival rates of patients with bile duct cancer and gallbladder cancer were 45% vs 0 and 3.3 years vs 8 months, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

HPD can be an acceptable treatment option for widespread bile duct cancer. However, the indication for HPD in advanced-stage gallbladder cancer should be considered carefully, considering the high morbidity rate and the advanced stage of the disease.

Salvage hepatectomy for perihilar malignancy treated initially with biliary self-expanding metallic stents

BACKGROUND

A salvage hepatectomy for an "inoperable" advanced perihilar tumor initially treated with a self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) is challenging, and its safety and survival benefits remain unclear. The aim of this study was to report our experiences with this difficult resection.

METHODS

This study involved 10 consecutive patients with suspected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent SEMS placement at a local hospital and were referred to our clinic for possible resection as their last option. Their medical records were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Tumor extent was first reevaluated using multidetector-row computed tomography. Of the 10 patients, 4 were diagnosed as inoperable owing to locally advanced tumors (n = 3) or poor physical condition (n = 1). In the remaining 6 patients, after additional biliary drainage, a salvage hepatectomy was performed, including a right hepatectomy with a caudate lobectomy in 5 patients and a central bisectionectomy with a caudate lobectomy in 1. A combined portal vein resection was required in 3 patients, and a combined pancreatoduodenectomy was performed in 2 patients. R0 resection was achieved in 5 patients, and all patients tolerated the resection. Three patients died of recurrence, and the remaining 3 were alive without recurrence at the time of publication, 1 of whom has survived >10 years.

CONCLUSION

Pre-resection SEMS placement does not preclude a subsequent hepatectomy for patients with advanced perihilar tumors. Salvage hepatectomy, although technically demanding, is feasible and can revise the palliative scenario and benefit selected patients treated initially with an SEMS.

Surgical management trends for cholangiocarcinoma in the USA 1998-2009

BACKGROUND

Surgical advancements have improved outcomes for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients, but this expertise is not uniformly available. This research examines CCA surgical treatment patterns.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998-2009 identified CCA patients at high-volume (HV) versus low-volume (LV) hospitals, and teaching versus nonteaching hospitals. We performed multinomial and multivariate logistic regressions to compare differences of surgical treatment between HV vs. LV hospitals, and teaching vs. nonteaching hospitals. Liver resection (LR), pancreaticoduodenectomy, bile duct (BD) resection, and combined liver/BD resection were considered more aggressive therapy than BD stent or bypass.

RESULTS

A total of 32,561 patients with CCA were identified. The proportion receiving surgery declined from 36 to 30 %. There was no increase in the proportion of LRs or combined liver/BD resection. Patients at HV or teaching hospitals were more likely to receive surgical treatment [odds ratio (OR), 1.3, p < 0.001; OR, 1.4, p < 0.001].

DISCUSSION

Despite increasing evidence that surgical resection increases survival, the number of patients receiving surgery has decreased. Although combined liver/BD resection has been advocated as standard management for proximal CCA, the practice has not increased. All patients with CCA should be considered for assessment at a HV teaching hospital.

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a surgeon's viewpoint on current topics

Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas are defined anatomically as "tumors that are located in the extrahepatic biliary tree proximal to the origin of the cystic duct". However, as the boundary between the extrahepatic and intrahepatic bile ducts is not well defined, perihilar cholangiocarcinomas potentially include two types of tumors: one is the "extrahepatic" type, which arises from the large hilar bile duct, and the other is the "intrahepatic" type, which has an intrahepatic component with the invasion of the hepatic hilus. The new TNM staging system published by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) has been well revised with regard to perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, but it still lacks stratification of patient prognosis and has little applicability for assessing the feasibility of surgical treatment; therefore, further refinement is essential. Most patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinomas present with jaundice, and preoperative biliary drainage is mandatory. Previously, percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was used in many centers; however, it is accepted that endoscopic naso-biliary drainage is the most suitable method of preoperative drainage. Portal vein embolization is now widely used as a presurgical treatment for patients undergoing an extended hepatectomy to minimize postoperative liver dysfunction. The surgical resection of a perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is technically demanding and continues to be the most difficult challenge for hepatobiliary surgeons. Because of advances in diagnostic and surgical techniques, surgical outcomes and survival rates after resection have steadily improved. However, survival, especially for patients with lymph node metastasis, is still unsatisfactory, and the establishment of adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary. Further synergy of endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and surgeons is required to conquer this intractable disease.

Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center review of 85 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

To outline our experience with hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) as a treatment for cholangiocarcinoma and to appraise the clinical significance of this challenging procedure.

BACKGROUND

Cholangiocarcinomas often exhibit an extensive ductal spread invading from the hepatic hilus to the lower bile duct, and such tumors can be completely resected only by HPD. Early experiences with HPD were associated with high mortality and morbidity, leading to an underestimation of the survival benefit of HPD.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 85 patients with cholangiocarcinoma who underwent HPD from 1992 to 2011. Major hepatectomy was performed in 79 patients (92.9%), and combined vascular resection was performed in 26 patients (30.6%).

RESULTS

The operating time was 762 ± 141 minutes, and blood loss was 2696 ± 1970 mL. Liver failure was the most common abdominal complication (n = 64), followed by pancreatic fistula (n = 60), wound sepsis (n = 33), intra-abdominal abscess (n = 22), refractory ascites (n = 17), bacteremia (n = 16), bile leakage (n = 13), and delayed gastric emptying (n = 12). Re-laparotomy was necessary in 9 cases (11.1%). Overall, 19 patients (22.4%) exhibited Clavien grade 0 to II complications, 58 (68.2%) exhibited grade III, 6 (7.1%) exhibited grade IV, and 2 (2.4%) exhibited grade V (mortality). The overall survival rate for the 85 patients was 79.7% after 1 year, 48.5% after 3 years, 37.4% after 5 years, and 32.1% after 10 years; 9 (10.5%) patients survived for more than 5 years. The rate of survival for the 53 patients with pM0 disease who underwent R0 resection was the most favorable, with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 54.3% and 46.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HPD is technically demanding and is associated with high morbidity. However, this surgery can be performed with low mortality and offers a better probability of long-term survival in selected patients. As hepatobiliary surgeons, we should consider HPD to be a standard procedure for laterally advanced cholangiocarcinomas that are otherwise unresectable.

Blood Loss and Massive Transfusion in Patients Undergoing Major Oncological Surgery: What Do We Know?

Patients with solid malignancies who were not candidates for tumor resections in the past are now presenting for extensive oncological resections. Cancer patients are at risk for thromboembolic complications due to an underlying hypercoagulable state; however, some patients may have an increased risk for bleeding due to the effects of chemotherapy, the administration of anticoagulant drugs, tumor-related fibrinolysis, tumor location, tumor vascularity, and extent of disease. A common potential complication of all complex oncological surgeries is massive intra- and postoperative hemorrhage and the subsequent risk for massive blood transfusion. This can be anticipated or unexpected. Several surgical and anesthesia interventions including preoperative tumor embolization, major vessel occlusion, hemodynamic manipulation, and perioperative antifibrinolytic therapy have been used to prevent or control blood loss with varying success. The exact incidence of massive blood transfusion in oncological surgery is largely unknown and/or underreported. The current literature mostly consists of purely descriptive observational studies. Thus, recommendation regarding specific perioperative intervention cannot be made at this point, and more research is warranted.