High case volumes and surgical fellowships are associated with improved outcomes for bariatric surgery patients: a justification of current credentialing initiatives for practice and training

Gynecologic Surgical Subspecialty Training Decreases Surgical Complications in Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of gynecologic subspecialty training on surgical outcomes in benign minimally invasive hysterectomies (MIHs) while accounting for surgeon volume.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent an MIH between 2014 and 2017.

SETTING

Single community hospital system.

PATIENTS

Patients were identified via Current Procedural Terminology codes for MIH: vaginal, laparoscopic, or robotic. Exclusion criteria included a gynecologic cancer diagnosis or concomitant major procedure at the time of hysterectomy. One thousand six hundred thirty-one patients underwent a benign MIH performed by a gynecologic generalist or a subspecialist in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery, urogynecology and pelvic reconstructive surgery, or gynecologic oncology; 125 hysterectomies were vaginal, 539 were conventional laparoscopic, and 967 were robotic.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Surgical outcomes, including intraoperative complications, operative outcomes, and postoperative readmissions and reoperations, were compared between generalists and subspecialists and were stratified by surgeon volume status, with high-volume (HV) defined as performing 12 or more hysterectomies annually. Odds ratios for the primary outcome, Clavien-Dindo Grade III complications (which included visceral injuries, conversions, and reoperations within 90 days), were calculated to evaluate the impact of subspecialty training while accounting for surgeon volume status. Of 1631 MIHs, 855 (52.4%) were performed by generalists and 776 (47.6%) by subspecialists. HV generalists performed 618 (37.9%) of MIHs, and 237 (14.5%) were performed by low-volume generalists. All subspecialists were HV surgeons; 38.1% of generalists were HV. The odds ratio of a Clavien-Dindo Grade III complication was 0.39 (0.25-0.62) for hysterectomies performed by subspecialists compared to HV generalists after adjusting for potential confounding variables (p <.001). Subspecialists and HV surgeons had significantly lower incidences of visceral injuries, transfusions, blood loss over 500 mL, and conversions compared with generalists and low-volume surgeons, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both subspecialty training and high surgeon volume status are associated with a lower risk of surgical complications in benign MIH. Subspecialty training is associated with a reduction in surgical complications even after accounting for surgeon volume.

Evaluating Patient and Surgeon Characteristics Associated with Care Cost and Outcomes for Knee and Hip Replacement Procedures: A National Medicare Cohort Study

Background

The role of physician credentialing has been widely considered in quality and outcome improvement studies. However, the association between surgeon characteristics and health-care costs remains unclear.

Methods

Our objective was to determine the association of orthopaedic surgeon characteristics with health outcomes and costs, utilizing Medicare data. We used 100% Fee-for-Service Medicare data from 2015 to 2019 to identify all patients ≥65 years of age who underwent 2 common orthopaedic surgical procedures, total hip and knee replacement. After determining whether the patients had been readmitted after discharge from their initial admission for surgery, we computed 3 metrics of total medical expenditure: the costs of the initial surgery admission and 30-day and 180-day episode-based bundles of care. Hierarchical linear regression and logistic regression models were used to evaluate patient and surgeon characteristics associated with care costs and the likelihood of readmission.

Results

We identified 2,269 surgeons who performed total knee replacements on 298,934 patients and 1,426 surgeons who performed total hip replacements on 204,721 patients. Patient characteristics associated with higher initial surgery costs included increasing age, female sex, racial minority status, and a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index. Surgeon characteristics associated with lower readmission rates included practice in the Northeast region and a higher patient volume; having malpractice claims was associated with higher readmission rates.

Conclusions

A higher volume of patients treated by the orthopaedic surgeon was associated with lower overall costs and readmission rates. Information on surgeons' malpractice claims and annual volume should be made publicly available to assist patients, payer networks, and hospitals in surgeon selection and oversight. These results could also inform the guidelines of physician credentialing organizations.

Level of Evidence

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Sleeve Gastrectomy and Implications for Surgical Resident Education

Introduction: Resident participation in advanced minimally invasive and bariatric surgeries is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety of resident participation in robotic and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Methods: Prospectively maintained institutional Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who underwent SG, which was performed at our institution between January, 2018, and December, 2021. Operative notes were reviewed to determine the training level of the assistant. These were then classified into 7 groups: postgraduate years 1-5 residents, bariatric fellow (6), and attending surgeons (7). Each group was stratified and their outcomes, which included duration of surgery, length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, readmissions, and reoperations, were compared. Results: Out of 2571 cases, the assistants for the procedures were minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fellows (n = 863, 58.8%), fifth- and fourth-year residents (n = 228, 15.5%), third- and second-year residents (n = 164, 11.2%), no assistants (n = 212, 14.5%), and 134 robotic SG. Mean body mass index was higher in cases wherein the attending surgeon performed by himself (47.1, standard deviation 7.7) when compared with other groups. There were no conversions to open. Mean LOS was 1.3 days, and there was no difference between groups (P = .242). Postoperative complications were low, with 11 reoperations in 30 days (3.3%) and no difference between groups. There was no mortality in 30 or 90 days. Conclusion: Postoperative outcomes were similar for patients who underwent SG regardless of the assistant's level of training. Including residents in bariatric procedures is safe and does not affect patient safety. Encouraging residents to participate in complex MIS procedures is recommended as part of their training.

The Impact of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeon Status on Outcomes After Bariatric Surgery: a Retrospective Cohort Study Using the MBSAQIP Database

PURPOSE

Differences between complication rates of bariatric surgeries performed by general surgeons (GS) versus those performed by metabolic and bariatric surgeons (MBS) are poorly understood.

METHODS

We analyzed the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database focusing on RYGB and SG procedures between 2016 and 2019. Our primary objective was to evaluate trends in the number of bariatric procedures performed by GS and MBS. Secondary objectives were assessing for differences in 30-day mortality and the incidence of serious complications. Differences between groups were evaluated by chi-squared analysis for categorical data and ANOVA tests for continuous data. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine the influence of subspecialized training on the incidence of serious complications and 30 day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 622,079 patients were analyzed, 15,485 were operated on by GS (2.5%, mean age 44.7 years, mean BMI 45.2 kg/m²), while 606,594 procedures were performed by MBS (97.5%, mean age 44.4 years, mean BMI 45.2 kg/m²). The proportion of procedures being completed by the GS group decreased from n=4662, 3.2% in 2016, to n=3414, 2.1% in 2019. After adjusting for comorbidities, MBS patients did not have differences in death at 30 days (OR 1.26 [0.67-2.38], p=0.467) or serious complications (OR 0.97 [0.89-1.06], p=0.554).

CONCLUSION

The majority of bariatric procedures are being completed by MBS with the proportion completed by GS decreasing. We found no difference in the number of serious complications and 30-day mortality rates across the MBS and GS groups. Graphical abstract.

Outcomes in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Implications for Surgical Resident Education

OBJECTIVES

Some surgery residents feel inadequately prepared to perform advanced operations, partly due to losing operative opportunities to fellows. In turn, they are prompted to pursue fellowships. Allowing residents the opportunity to participate in advanced procedures and complex cases may alleviate this cycle, if their participation is safe. This study examined the effects of resident participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures (LRYGBs).

DESIGN

Our MBSAQIP database was used to identify LRYGBs performed at our institution between 2015 and 2018. Operative notes were reviewed to determine training level of the assistant. Patient comorbidities and outcomes (duration of surgery, length of stay, post-operative complications, readmissions, and reoperations) were stratified by assistant level of training for comparison.

SETTING

Urban tertiary care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Trainees and attending surgeons acting as assistants during LRYGBs.

RESULTS

Among 987 total cases, the assistants for the procedures were chief residents (n = 549, 56%), fourth-year residents (n = 258, 26%), attending surgeons (n = 143, 14%), and third-year residents (n = 37, 4%). Attending surgeons assisted more often when patients had a BMI ≥ 45 (38% attendings vs. 25% residents, p = 0.007), ≥ 2 comorbidities (54% vs. 40%, p = 0.007), or had a history of prior bariatric surgery (22% vs. 3%, p < 0.0001).Post-operative complication rate was low (4%) and did not differ significantly between all training levels (p = 0.86). Average length of stay, readmission rates, and reoperation rates were not significantly different across training levels (p = 0.75, p = 0.072, and p = 0.91 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Complication rates, hospital length of stay, readmission rates, and reoperation rates were equivalent for patients regardless of the level of training of the assistant for LRYGBs. Involving residents in complex bariatric procedures such as LRYGB is a safe model of education that does not compromise patient safety or hospital outcomes. Involvement in advanced cases allows general surgery residents to more confidently move toward independent practice.

Impact of Excess Body Weight on Postsurgical Complications

BACKGROUND

Obesity is considered a risk factor for postoperative complications as it can limit exposure to the operation field, thereby significantly prolonging surgery time. Obesity-associated comorbidities, such as low-grade systemic inflammation, impaired functional status, and type 2 diabetes, are independent risk factors for impaired anastomotic wound healing and nonsurgical site infections. If obesity itself is an independent risk factor for surgical complications remains controversial, but the reason for this is largely unexplored.

SUMMARY

A MEDLINE literature search was performed using the terms: "obesity," "excess body weight," and "surgical complications." Out of 65,493 articles 432 meta-analyses were screened, of which 25 meta-analyses were on the subject. The vast majority of complex oncologic procedures in the field of visceral surgery have shown higher complication rates in obese patients. Meta-analyses from the last 10 to 15 years with high numbers of patients enrolled consistently have shown longer operation times, higher blood loss, longer hospital stay for colorectal procedures, oncologic upper gastrointestinal (GI) procedures, and pancreatic surgery. Interestingly, these negative effects seem not to affect the overall survival in oncologic patients, especially in esophageal resections. A selection bias in oncologic upper GI patients may have influenced the results with higher BMI in upper GI cancer to be a predictor for better nutritional and performance status.

KEY MESSAGES

Contrary to bariatric surgery, only limited evidence indicated that site and type of surgery, the approach to the abdominal cavity (laparoscopic vs. open), institutional factors, and the type of perioperative care such as ERAS protocols may play a role in determining postsurgical complications in obese patients. The initial question remains therefore partially unanswered. Large nationwide register-based studies are necessary to better understand which aspects of obesity and its related comorbidities define it as a risk factor for surgical complications.

Impact of centre volume, surgeon volume, surgeon experience and geographic location on reoperation after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures

Background:

Tibial shaft fractures are the most common long-bone injury, with a reported annual incidence of more than 75 000 in the United States. This study aimed to determine whether patients with tibial fractures managed with intramedullary nails experience a lower rate of reoperation if treated at higher-volume hospitals, or by higher-volume or more experienced surgeons.

Methods:

The Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures (SPRINT) was a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing reamed and nonreamed intramedullary nailing on rates of reoperation to promote fracture union, treat infection or preserve the limb in patients with open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft. Using data from SPRINT, we quantified centre and surgeon volumes into quintiles. We performed analyses adjusted for type of fracture (open v. closed), type of injury (isolated v. multitrauma), gender and age for the primary outcome of reoperation using multivariable logistic regression.

Results:

There were no significant differences in the odds of reoperation between high- and low-volume centres (p = 0.9). Overall, surgeon volume significantly affected the odds of reoperation (p = 0.03). The odds of reoperation among patients treated by moderate-volume surgeons were 50% less than those among patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons (odds ratio [OR] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28–0.88), and the odds of reoperation among patients treated by high-volume surgeons were 47% less than those among patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.30–0.93).

Conclusion:

There appears to be no significant additional patient benefit in treatment by a higher-volume centre for intramedullary fixation of tibial shaft fractures. Additional research on the effects of surgical and clinical site volume in tibial shaft fracture management is needed to confirm this finding. The odds of reoperation were higher in patients treated by very-low-volume surgeons; this finding may be used to optimize the results of tibial shaft fracture management.

Clinical trial registration:

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00038129

Robotic surgery results in better outcomes following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program analysis for the years 2015-2018

BACKGROUND

The use of robotic surgery in bariatric patients is controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcome of robotic surgery in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients.

SETTING

Tertiary-care referral hospital.

METHODS

A total of 149,132 patients who underwent RYGB in the 2015 to 2018 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) database were included in our initial analysis. The propensity-matched analysis that was performed resulted in 21,736 patients, whose data were utilized to compare outcomes of the robotic (R) and laparoscopic (L) groups. Patients were also compared after dividing them into obese (body mass index [BMI] < 50 kg/m²) and super-obese categories (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m²).

RESULTS

R-RYGB patients had a significantly lower 30-day incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) and bleeding (2.0% and .7%, respectively, for R-RYGB versus 2.4% and 1.3%, respectively, for L-RYGB; P ≤ .05) but a higher incidence of 30-day reoperation compared to L-RYGB patients (2.7% versus 2.3%, respectively; P ≤ .05). The R-RYGB group also had a shorter length of hospital stay compared to the L-RYGB group (1.98 versus 2.02 days, respectively; P ≤ .05), but higher readmission rates (7.1% versus 5.8%, respectively; P ≤ .05). The robotic approach also resulted in lower mortality rates for those in the super-obese category. In that BMI category, 30-day mortality rates were .4% versus .2% for L-RYGB and R-RYGB patients, respectively (P ≤ .05).

CONCLUSION

The use of robotic surgery in bariatric patients is controversial. Our analysis, based on the MBSAQIP database for the years 2015 to 2018, demonstrated lower overall SAEs and bleeding rates, in addition to a shorter hospital stay, favoring robotic RYGB compared to laparoscopic RYGB. However, readmission and reoperation rates were higher in the robotic group. Randomized controlled trials are needed to further clarify the benefit of robotic surgery in bariatric patients.

Barriers to Referral to Fellowship-trained Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Subspecialists

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine patterns and barriers for referral to fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons.

DESIGN

Questionnaire.

SETTING

United States and its territories and Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Actively practicing general obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs).

INTERVENTIONS

Internet-based survey.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 157 respondents, 144 (91.7%) general OB/GYNs were included. Subspecialty fellowship training resulted in the exclusion of 13 (8.3%) respondents. A total of 86 respondents (59.7%) considered referral to fellowship-trained minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (MIGS) subspecialists. The top 3 cited reasons for nonreferral were adequate residency training (n = 84, 58.3%), preference for continuity of care (n = 48, 33.3%), and preference for referral to other subspecialists (n = 46, 31.9%). The top 3 cited reasons for referral to MIGS subspecialists were complex pathology (n = 92, 63.9%), complex medical and/or surgical history (n = 76, 52.8%), and out of scope of practice (n = 53, 36.8%). If providers required intraoperative assistance, respondents consulted an OB/GYN colleague with comparable training (n = 50, 34.7%), gynecologic oncologist (n = 48, 33.3%), or non-OB/GYN surgical subspecialist (n = 33, 22.9%). Factors that were not associated with the decision to refer to MIGS subspecialists included years in practice (p = .13), additional training experiences beyond residency (p = .45), and number of hysterectomies performed by laparotomy (p = .69). Self-reported high-volume surgeons (p <.01) were less likely to refer. In contrast, providers who self-reported as low-volume surgeons (p = .02) and were aware of MIGS subspecialists in the community (p <.01) were more likely to consider referral. Respondents reported using a laparoscopic approach to hysterectomy most frequently (n = 79, 54.9%). In contrast, 36.8% preferred the laparoscopic route for themselves or their partner, whereas 48.6% preferred the vaginal approach.

CONCLUSION

Most of the general OB/GYNs would consider referral to fellowship-trained MIGS subspecialists. Providers who reported adequate residency training and those who preferred continuity of care or referral to other surgical subspecialists were less likely to refer to MIGS subspecialists.

Cost Analysis of Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in a Single Academic Center: How Expensive Is Expensive?

BACKGROUND

Although the use of da Vinci robotic platforms in bariatric surgery is gaining momentum, it is still controversial because of financial concerns.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of our study is to evaluate the cost of robotically assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (R-RYGB) versus conventional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (L-RYGB).

METHODS

We analyzed consecutive primary bariatric patients who underwent R-RYGB and compared them with patients who underwent L-RYGB during the same time period. Primary outcomes were overall cost for length of stay, operating time, and supplies. Direct cost data was generated using the StrataJazz reporting module, which is fed daily from EPIC, our electronic health record system, and contains hospital-based data only. Secondary outcomes were 30-day rates of complications, reoperations, and readmissions.

RESULTS

We found no difference in primary or secondary outcomes following R-RYGB and L-RYGB. The overall cost for R-RYGB and L-RYGB was not statistically different (median total cost for R-RYGB and L-RYBG was $6431.34 and $6349.09, P > 0.05, respectively). Operating time cost was significantly higher for R-RYGB compared with L-RYGB ($2248.51 versus $19,836.29, respectively, P < 0.0001, respectively). R-RYGB had lower cost of supplies as well as a shorter length of stay compared with L-RYGB (mean 1.5 versus 1.7 days, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed no cost difference between R-RYGB and L-RYGB, with a decreased cost of supplies and trend toward lower hospital stay favoring R-RYGB. Further studies are needed to evaluate the outcomes of R-RYGB compared with L-RYGB; however, the cost of robotic surgery may not be a prohibitive factor.

Bariatric Surgical Simulation: Evaluation in a Pilot Study of SimLife, a New Dynamic Simulated Body Model

Background

The demand for bariatric surgery is high and so is the need for training future bariatric surgeons. Bariatric surgery, as a technically demanding surgery, imposes a learning curve that may initially induce higher morbidity. In order to limit the clinical impact of this learning curve, a simulation preclinical training can be offered. The aim of the work was to assess the realism of a new cadaveric model for simulated bariatric surgery (sleeve and Roux in Y gastric bypass).

Aim

A face validation study of SimLife, a new dynamic cadaveric model of simulated body for acquiring operative skills by simulation. The objectives of this study are first of all to measure the realism of this model, the satisfaction of learners, and finally the ability of this model to facilitate a learning process.

Methods

SimLife technology is based on a fresh body (frozen/thawed) given to science associated to a patented technical module, which can provide pulsatile vascularization with simulated blood heated to 37 °C and ventilation.

Results

Twenty-four residents and chief residents from 3 French University Digestive Surgery Departments were enrolled in this study. Based on their evaluation, the overall satisfaction of the cadaveric model was rated as 8.52, realism as 8.91, anatomic correspondence as 8.64, and the model’s ability to be learning tool as 8.78.

Conclusion

The use of the SimLife model allows proposing a very realistic surgical simulation model to realistically train and objectively evaluate the performance of young surgeons.

A meta-analysis of bariatric surgery-related outcomes in accredited versus unaccredited hospitals in the United States

The American Society for Bariatric Surgery established a set of standards for bariatric surgery Centers of Excellence accreditation programme in 2003. While several research efforts have shown that post-bariatric surgery outcomes were poorer in unaccredited as compared to accredited hospitals, others have questioned the same. This research effort sought to use random effects meta-analysis to quantitatively summarize the existing research efforts analysing this association, which were published between January 2000 and October 2018. Out of the total 559 articles, 13 that quantitatively analysed the effect of accreditation on post-operative mortality- and morbidity-related outcomes were included in the analysis. Overall, the weighted pooled estimates showed that compared to accredited, in the unaccredited hospitals, the odds of mortality were twice as high (odds ratio: 1.83; confidence interval: 1.49, 2.25), and those for morbidity were 1.23 times higher (1.11, 1.36). Estimates varied by the data source used, and the effect estimate used (odds or risk ratios). Overall, the odds of poor post-operative outcomes were higher among unaccredited hospitals as compared to accredited. However, there were analytic differences and other limitations among the existing efforts. Future research efforts conducting independent analyses on these data sources, keeping the methodology consistent are needed.

Training in Bariatric Surgery: a National Survey of German Bariatric Surgeons

INTRODUCTION

Skill in bariatric surgery has been associated with postoperative outcome. Appropriate surgical training is of paramount importance. In order to continuously improve training strategies, it is necessary to assess current practices.

AIM

To determine how German bariatric surgeons have been trained and to assess current training strategies.

METHODS

Between February 2017 and March 2017, an online census of surgeons registered as members of the German Society for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery was conducted. A total of three reminders were sent out. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Data was reported as median (interquartile range); percentages were adjusted for completed answers only.

RESULTS

A response rate of 51% (n = 214) was achieved. Surgeons reported a median of 14.5 (8-20) years of surgical experience after initial training, with a specific bariatric experience of 7 (4-13) years. The total cumulative bariatric case volume was 240 (80-500) cases, with an annual case volume of 50 (25-80). The most commonly applied approaches to bariatric skills acquisition were "learning by doing" (71%), "course participation" (70%) and "observerships" (70%). Fellowships and the use of operating videos were less frequently applied strategies (19%/ 47%). Interestingly, observerships (94%) and course participation (89%) were rated as very important/important, whereas "learning by doing" (62%), watching operation videos (59%), and fellowships (48%) were less frequently perceived as important/very important training strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of surgeons performing bariatric cases were senior surgeons with more than 10 years of post-training experience; nevertheless, the survey revealed a lack of structured approaches to bariatric specialization training.

The effect of surrogate procedure volume on bariatric surgery outcomes: do common laparoscopic general surgery procedures matter?

BACKGROUND

A growing body of evidence shows that experience and acquired skills from surrogate surgical procedures may be transferrable to a specific index operation. It is unclear whether this applies to bariatric surgery. This study aims to determine whether there is a surrogate volume effect of common laparoscopic general surgery procedures on all-cause bariatric surgical morbidity.

METHODS

This was a population-based study of all patients aged ≥ 18 who received a bariatric procedure in Ontario from 2008 to 2015. The main outcome of interest was all-cause morbidity during the index admission. All-cause morbidity included any documented complication which extended length of stay by 24 h or required reoperation. Bariatric cases included laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Non-bariatric cases included three common laparoscopic general surgery procedures.

RESULTS

13,836 bariatric procedures were performed by 29 surgeons at nine centers of excellence. A reduction in all-cause morbidity was seen when bariatric surgeons exceeded 75 cases annually (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98, P = 0.023), with further reduction in increasing bariatric volume. However, the volume of non-bariatric surgeries did not significantly affect bariatric all-cause morbidity rates amongst bariatric surgeons, even when exceeding 100 cases (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.61-1.12, P = 0.222).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggests that experience and skills acquired in performing non-bariatric laparoscopic general surgery does not appear to affect all-cause morbidity in bariatric surgery. Therefore, only a surgeon's bariatric procedure volume should considered be a quality marker for outcomes after bariatric surgery.

Cost analysis of robotic sleeve gastrectomy (R-SG) compared with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (L-SG) in a single academic center: debunking a myth!

BACKGROUND

Although use of the da Vinci robotic platform in bariatric surgery is gaining momentum, there are financial concerns.

OBJECTIVES

Our retrospective study evaluated the cost of robotically assisted sleeve gastrectomy (R-SG) versus conventional laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (L-SG).

SETTING

Center of Excellence bariatric surgery center in Allentown, Pennsylvania.

METHODS

We analyzed consecutive patients who underwent primary R-SG and compared them with L-SG patients. Primary outcomes were overall cost for length of stay, operating time, and supplies. Secondary outcomes were 30-day complications, reoperations, and readmissions.

RESULTS

We had no adverse events in either group. The overall cost for R-SG and L-SG was not statistically different (mean total cost for R-SG and L-SG was $5308.99 and $4918.88, respectively). Operating time cost was significantly higher for R-SG compared with L-SG ($1340 versus $112 for R-SG and L-SG, respectively). R-SG had a shorter length of stay compared with L-SG (1.4 versus 1.5 d, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed no difference in cost R-SG and L-SG, with a trend toward shorter length of stay for R-SG over time.

A novel risk prediction model for 30-day severe adverse events and readmissions following bariatric surgery based on the MBSAQIP database

BACKGROUND

Although bariatric surgery is safe, some patients fear serious complications.

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study used the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Project (MBSAQIP) database to evaluate patient outcomes for gastric bypass (GB) and sleeve gastrectomy and to develop a risk prediction model for serious adverse events (SAEs) and readmission rates 30 days after surgery.

SETTING

MBSAQIP national patient database.

METHODS

We created separate exploratory multivariable logistic regression models for SAEs and readmissions. We then externally validated both models using the 2016 MBSAQIP Participant Use Data File.

RESULTS

Significant predictors of SAEs were preoperative body mass index (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.07, P < .0001); GB surgery (AOR 2.08, P < .0001); cardiovascular disease (AOR 1.43, P < .0001); smoking (AOR 1.12, P = .04); diabetes (AOR 1.15, P = .0001); hypertension (AOR 1.17, P < .0001); limited ambulation (AOR 1.48, P < .0001); sleep apnea (AOR 1.12, P = .001); history of pulmonary embolism (AOR 2.81, P < .0001); and steroid use (AOR 1.40, P = .001). Significant predictors of readmissions were GB surgery (AOR 1.81, P < .0001); female sex (AOR 1.26, P < .0001); diabetes (AOR 1.08, P = .04); hypertension (AOR 1.11, P = .004); preoperative body mass index (AOR 1.05, P < .0001); sleep apnea (AOR 1.11, P = .002); history of pulmonary embolism (AOR 2.35, P < .0001); cardiovascular disease (AOR 1.61, P < .0001); smoking (AOR 1.14, P = .01); and limited ambulation (AOR 1.55, P < .0001). External validation supported these covariates, with similar model discriminative power.

CONCLUSIONS

Our exploratory regression models may be used by clinicians to counsel patients about surgical risks, although future external validation should occur in non-North American populations.

Resident Case Volume Correlates with Clinical Performance: Finding the Sweet Spot

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the total number of studies interpreted during radiology residency correlates with clinical performance as measured by objective criteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of three graduating classes of radiology residents from a single residency program between the years 2015-2017. The total number of studies interpreted by each resident during residency was tracked. Clinical performance was determined by tracking an individual resident's major discordance rate. A major discordance was recorded when there was a difference between the preliminary resident interpretation and final attending interpretation that could immediately impact patient care. Accreditation council for graduate medical education milestones at the completion of residency, Diagnostic radiology in-training scores in the third year, and score from the American board of radiology core exam were also tabulated. Pearson correlation coefficients and polynomial regression analysis were used to identify correlations between the total number of interpreted films and clinical, test, and milestone performance.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven residents interpreted a mean of 12,709 studies (range 8898-19,818; standard deviation [SD] 2351.9) in residency with a mean major discordance rate of 1.1% (range 0.34%-2.54%; stand dev 0.49%). There was a nonlinear correlation between total number of interpreted films and performance. As the number of interpreted films increased to approximately 16,000, clinical performance (p = 0.004) and test performance (p = 0.01) improved, but volumes over 16,000 correlated with worse performance.

CONCLUSION

The total number of studies interpreted during radiology training correlates with performance. Residencies should endeavor to find the "sweet spot": the amount of work that maximizes clinical exposure and knowledge without overburdening trainees.

Matching Trends for the Fellowship in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Since Participation in the National Residency Match Program

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the level of interest in the fellowship in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery (FMIGS) using data from the National Residency Match Program (NRMP) over the past 5 years.

DESIGN

Retrospective report (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

SETTING

Publicly reported data from the NRMP.

PARTICIPANTS

Applicants using the NRMP to match into fellowship training.

INTERVENTIONS

Reporting matching trends for the gynecologic surgical subspecialty programs starting in 2014, when the FMIGS programs began participating in the NRMP.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

From 2014 to 2018, the number of FMIGS positions increased from 28 to 38. Over the 5 application cycles, the FMIGS programs had the highest ratio of applicants to positions overall (range, 1.7-2.0 for FMIGS) of the surgical gynecologic subspecialty programs analyzed (Gynecologic Oncology, Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, and Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility).

CONCLUSIONS

Since the FMIGS programs began participating in the NRMP in 2014, the FMIGS match has been highly competitive as a gynecologic surgical subspecialty, suggesting a high level of interest from residency graduates. This may reflect growing recognition that there is a body of knowledge unique to minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons.

Safety and efficacy of bariatric surgery in Mexico: A detailed analysis of 500 surgeries performed at a high-volume center

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Bariatric surgery is the best method for treating obesity and its comorbidities. Our aim was to provide a detailed analysis of the perioperative outcomes in Mexican patients that underwent surgery at a high-volume hospital center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on all the patients that underwent bariatric surgery at a single hospital center within a time frame of 4 and one-half years. Demographics, the perioperative variables, complications (early and late), weight loss, failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus remission were all analyzed.

RESULTS

Five hundred patients were included in the study, 83.2% of whom were women. Mean patient age was 38.8 years and BMI was 44.1kg/m². The most common comorbidities were high blood pressure, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. Laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery was performed in 85.8% of the patients, sleeve gastrectomy in 13%, and revision surgeries in 1%. There were 9.8% early complications and 12.2% late ones, with no deaths. Overall weight loss as the excess weight loss percentage at 12 and 24 months was 76.9 and 77.6%. The greatest weight loss at 12 months was seen in the patients that underwent laparoscopic gastric bypass. A total of 11.4% of the patients had treatment failure. In the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, 68.7% presented with complete disease remission and 9.3% with partial remission. There was improvement in 21.8% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience at a high-volume hospital center, bariatric surgery is safe and effective, based on the low number of adverse effects and consequent weight loss and type 2 diabetes mellitus control. Long-term studies with a larger number of patients are needed to determine the final impact of those procedures.

Decreased Rate of Complications in Carpal Tunnel Release with Hand Fellowship Training

Purpose

In many procedures, both high case volumes and fellowship training have been shown to improve outcomes. One of the most common procedures performed by hand surgeons, the carpal tunnel release (CTR) is also performed by several other specialties without specialty training in a hand fellowship. This study analyzed the effect that hand fellowship training has on outcomes of CTRs.

Materials and Methods

Using the American Board of Orthopedic Surgeons (ABOS) Part II candidates' case list submissions, a database was created for all open and endoscopic CTRs. Surgeon training, demographics, technique, and complications were recorded. Complications were then categorized and broken down by technique. Results were then analyzed for statistical significance.

Results

A total of 29,916 cases were identified. Hand fellowship-trained surgeons performed six times more CTRs at 31 cases per surgeon compared with five for non-hand fellowship-trained surgeons. They also improved outcomes in rates of infection, wound dehiscence, and overall complications. Rates of nerve injury or recurrence showed no statistical difference. This held true for the open release subset. Endoscopically, fellowship-trained surgeons had only improved rates of overall complications.

Conclusion

Surgeons undergoing additional hand fellowship training may show improved outcomes in the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. However, no effect was seen on nerve injury or recurrence of symptoms.

The role of routine abdominal drainage after bariatric surgery: a metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program study

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of drains has long been debated in bariatric surgery. Drains may provide some theoretical benefits to early detection of anastomotic leaks and potential nonoperative treatment; however, there has never been data to support the practice.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of drain placement after bariatric surgery.

SETTING

This retrospective cohort study includes all hospitals in the United States that participated in the 2015 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program.

METHODS

Only patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass were included for the analysis. The main outcomes of interest were anastomotic leak, reoperation, all-cause morbidity, readmission, and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of abdominal drainage on the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 142,631 patients were identified in the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. After adjustment for major clinical variables, the odds of anastomotic leaks increased by 30% with the placement of a drain (odds ratio: 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.57, P = .01) while the odds of reoperation increased by 17% (95% CI: 1.06-1.30, P = .01). The odds of all cause morbidity increased 19% (95% CI: 1.14-1.25, P<.01), and odds of readmission were significantly higher (odds ratio:1.12, 95% CI:1.06-1.19, P<.01). The odds of mortality did not change significantly with the placement of a drain.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a large observational cohort, this study provided no evidence that routine drainage is beneficial to patients, but rather may increase major morbidity. Our findings suggest that the use of routine abdominal drainage should be restricted to very select, high-risk cases.

Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Initiatives in Contemporary Metabolic and Bariatric Surgical Practice

Patient safety and quality improvement have been part of bariatric surgery since its inception, and there have been significant improvements in outcomes of bariatric surgery over the past 2 decades. A strong accreditation program exists. This program defines 2 tiers of accredited centers: low-acuity and comprehensive centers similar to the trauma systems. Accreditation has been shown to have a favorable impact on outcomes of bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery lends itself well to improvements in processes and use of perioperative protocols, such as ulcer and thromboembolic prophylaxis prevention or gallstone prevention and management.

Systematic review with meta-analysis of the impact of surgical fellowship training on patient outcomes

Background

The number of surgeons entering fellowship training before independent practice is increasing. This may have a negative impact on surgeons in training. The impact of fellowship training on patient outcomes is not yet known. This review aimed to investigate the impact of fellowship training in surgery on patient outcomes.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted to identify studies exploring the structural and surgeon-specific characteristics of fellowship training on patient outcomes. Data from these studies were extracted, synthesized and reported qualitatively, or quantitatively through meta-analysis.

Results

Twenty-three studies were included. The mortality rate for patients in centres with an affiliated fellowship programme was lower than that for centres without (odds ratio 0·86, 95 per cent c.i. 0·84 to 0·88), as was the rate of complications (odds ratio 0·90, 0·78 to 1·02). Surgeons without fellowship training converted more laparoscopic operations to open surgery than those with fellowship training (risk ratio (RR) 1·04, 95 per cent c.i. 1·03 to 1·05). Comparison of outcomes for senior surgeons versus current fellows showed no differences in rates of mortality (RR 1·00, 1·00 to 1·01), complications (RR 1·03, 0·98 to 1·08) or conversion to open surgery (RR 1·01, 1·00 to 1·01).

Conclusion

Fellowship training appears to have a positive impact on patient outcomes.

Bariatric outcomes are significantly improved in hospitals with fellowship council-accredited bariatric fellowships

BACKGROUND

With the increasing demand of bariatric surgery, there is a need to train more surgeons, while identifying institutional factors associated with improved outcomes. Little is known regarding the impact of a fellowship training program on institutional outcomes. This study examines the effect of bariatric fellowship program status on perioperative outcomes within New York state.

METHODS

Using the New York statewide planning and research cooperative system, 47,342 adult patients in 91 hospitals were identified who underwent a laparoscopic bariatric surgery over a 6-year period. Hospitals with fellowships were identified from the Fellowship Council. Statistical comparison between patient demographics, payer source, comorbidities, bariatric procedure performed, and perioperative outcomes in hospitals with and without fellowship were performed.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, fellowship accreditation status was found to be associated with increased rates of cardiac complications and shock and decreased rates of pneumonia. Overall complication rate was not significantly different in fellowship versus non-fellowship institutions. However, when controlled for patient demographic, payer source, comorbidity, and operative procedure, there were significantly improved bariatric outcomes among institutions with fellowship programs.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of a fellowship program correlates with improved hospital outcomes, mitigating potential concerns about possible negative effects of trainees on hospitals and patients.

Hospital volume and outcomes for laparoscopic gastric bypass and adjustable gastric banding in the modern era

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, there has been a rapid decline in adverse events after bariatric surgery. As a result, it is possible that the influence of hospital volume on outcomes has attenuated over time. The objective of the present study was to examine whether the relationship between hospital volume and adverse events has persisted in the era of laparoscopic surgery. This study is based on analysis of State Inpatient Databases (SID) for 12 states from 2006 through 2011, which included 446,127 patients.

METHODS

Using hospital discharge data, changes in serious complications, reoperations and mortality over time, and the impact of hospital volume on outcomes among patients undergoing laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) were studied. Hospitals were stratified by operative volume, and using multivariable logistic regression to adjust for patient characteristics and procedure-type, the relationships between hospital volume and outcomes during 3 2-year periods were examined: 2006-2007, 2008-2009, and 2010-2011.

RESULTS

The rate of reoperations and mortality were low, and there were no significant differences between the highest (>125 cases/yr) and lowest (<50 cases/yr) volume hospitals for both LAGB and LRYGB. The volume-outcome relationship was most prominent when examining rates of adjusted odds ratios for serious complications at the lowest volume hospitals compared with the highest volume hospitals (LAGB: 1.65 [CI: 1.18, 2.30] for 2006-2007, 1.81 [CI: 1.36, 2.41] for 2008-2009, and 2.08 [CI:1.40, 3.09] for 2010-2011; LRYGB: 1.55 [CI:1.23, 1.95] for 2006-2007, 1.39 [CI:1.09, 1.76], and 1.39 [CI:1.07, 1.80] for 2010-2011).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes improved over the study period at both high- and low-volume volume hospitals. There remain significant differences in serious complications between the highest and lowest volume hospitals for both stapled and nonstapled procedures.

Does hospital accreditation impact bariatric surgery safety?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of hospital accreditation upon bariatric surgery outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Since 2004, the American College of Surgeons and the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery have accredited bariatric hospitals. Few studies have evaluated the impact of hospital accreditation on all bariatric surgery outcomes.

METHODS

Bariatric surgery hospitalizations were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD9) codes in the 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). Hospital names and American Hospital Association (AHA) codes were used to identify accredited bariatric centers. Relevant ICD9 codes were used for identifying demographics, length of stay (LOS), total charges, mortality, complications, and failure to rescue (FTR) events.

RESULTS

There were 117,478 weighted bariatric patient discharges corresponding to 235 unique hospitals in the 2010 NIS data set. A total of 72,615 (61.8%) weighted discharges, corresponding to 145 (61.7%) named or AHA-identifiable hospitals were included. Among the 145 hospitals, 66 (45.5%) were unaccredited and 79 (54.5%) accredited. Compared with accredited centers, unaccredited centers had a higher mean LOS (2.25 vs 1.99 days, P < 0.0001), as well as total charges ($51,189 vs $42,212, P < 0.0001). Incidence of any complication was higher at unaccredited centers than at accredited centers (12.3% vs 11.3%, P = 0.001), as was mortality (0.13% vs 0.07%, P = 0.019) and FTR (0.97% vs 0.55%, P = 0.046). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified unaccredited status as a positive predictor of incidence of complication [odds ratio (OR) = 1.08, P < 0.0001], as well as mortality (OR = 2.13, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Hospital accreditation status is associated with safer outcomes, shorter LOS, and lower total charges after bariatric surgery.

Impact of the Establishment of a Specialty Hernia Referral Center

Background. Creating a surgical specialty referral center requires a strong interest, expertise, and a market demand in that particular field, as well as some form of promotion. In 2004, we established a tertiary hernia referral center. Our goal in this study was to examine its impact on institutional volume and economics. Materials and methods. The database of all hernia repairs (2004-2011) was reviewed comparing hernia repair type and volume and center financial performance. The ventral hernia repair (VHR) patient subset was further analyzed with particular attention paid to previous repairs, comorbidities, referral patterns, and the concomitant involvement of plastic surgery. Results. From 2004 to 2011, 4927 hernia repairs were performed: 39.3% inguinal, 35.5% ventral or incisional, 16.2% umbilical, 5.8% diaphragmatic, 1.6% femoral, and 1.5% other. Annual billing increased yearly from 7% to 85% and averaged 37% per year. Comparing 2004 with 2011, procedural volume increased 234%, and billing increased 713%. During that period, there was a 2.5-fold increase in open VHRs, and plastic surgeon involvement increased almost 8-fold, ( P = .004). In 2005, 51 VHR patients had a previous repair, 27.0% with mesh, versus 114 previous VHR in 2011, 58.3% with mesh ( P < .0001). For VHR, in-state referrals from 2004 to 2011 increased 340% while out-of-state referrals jumped 580%. In 2011, 21% of all patients had more than 4 comorbidities, significantly increased from 2004 ( P = .02). Conclusion. The establishment of a tertiary, regional referral center for hernia repair has led to a substantial increase in surgical volume, complexity, referral geography, and financial benefit to the institution.

Centers of excellence in minimally invasive gynecology: Raising the bar for quality in women's health

The ‘‘Center of Excellence’’ concept has been employed in healthcare for several decades. This concept has been adopted in several disciplines; such as bariatric surgery, orthopedic surgery, diabetes and stroke. The most successful model in surgery thus far has been the bariatric program, with a very extensive network and a large prospective database. Recently, the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists has introduced this concept in gynecologic surgery. The ‘‘Center Of Excellence in Minimally Invasive Gynecology’’ (COEMIG) designation program has been introduced with the goals of increasing safety and efficiency, cutting cost and increasing patient awareness and access to minimally invasive surgical options for women. The program may harbor challenges as well, such as human and financial resources, and difficulties with implementation and maintenance of such designation. This commentary describes the COEMIG designation process, along with its potential benefits and possible challenges. Though no studies have been published to date on the value of this concept in the field of gynecologic surgery, we envision this commentary to provoke such studies to examine the relative value of this new program.

The impact of hospital volume, residency, and fellowship training on perioperative outcomes after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

Although high-volume hospitals have been associated with improved outcomes for radical prostatectomy (RP), the association of residency or fellowship teaching institutions or both and this volume-outcome relationship remains poorly described. We examine the effect of teaching status and hospital volume on perioperative RP outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Within the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, we focused on RPs performed between 2003 and 2007. We tested the rates of prolonged length of stay beyond the median of 3 days, in-hospital mortality, and intraoperative and postoperative complications, stratified according to teaching status. Multivariable logistic regression analyses further adjusted for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Overall, 47,100 eligible RPs were identified. Of these, 19,193 cases were performed at non-teaching institutions, 24,006 at residency teaching institutions, and 3,901 at fellowship teaching institutions. Relative to patients treated at non-teaching institutions, patients treated at fellowship teaching institutions were healthier and more likely to hold private insurance. In multivariable analyses, patients treated at residency (OR = 0.92, P = 0.015) and fellowship (OR = 0.82, P = 0.011) teaching institutions were less likely to experience a postoperative complication than patients treated at non-teaching institutions. Patients treated at residency (OR = 0.73, P<0.001) and fellowship (OR = 0.91, P = 0.045) teaching institutions were less likely to experience a prolonged length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

More favorable postoperative complication profile and shorter length of stay should be expected at residency and fellowship teaching institutions following RP. Moreover, postoperative complication rates were lower at fellowship teaching than at residency teaching institutions, despite adjustment for potential confounders.

The application of comorbidity indices to predict early postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a nationwide comparative analysis of over 70,000 cases

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) often have substantial comorbidities, which must be taken into account to appropriately assess expected postoperative outcomes. The Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser indices are widely used comorbidity measures, both of which also have revised algorithms based on enhanced ICD-9-CM coding. It is currently unclear which of the existing comorbidity measures best predicts early postoperative outcomes following LRYGB.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, patients 18 years or older undergoing LRYGB for obesity between 2001 and 2008 were identified. Comorbidities were assessed according to the original and enhanced Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser indices. Using multivariate logistic regression, the following early postoperative outcomes were assessed: overall postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and conversion to open surgery. Model performance for the four comorbidity indices was assessed and compared using C-statistics and the Akaike's information criterion (AIC).

RESULTS

A total of 70,287 patients were included. Mean age was 43.1 years (SD, 10.8), 81.6 % were female and 60.3 % were White. Both the original and enhanced Elixhauser indices modestly outperformed the Charlson/Deyo in predicting the surgical outcomes. All four models had similar C-statistics, but the original Elixhauser index was associated with the smallest AIC for all of the surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The original Elixhauser index is the best predictor of early postoperative outcomes in our cohort of patients undergoing LRYGB. However, differences between the Charlson/Deyo and Elixhauser indices are modest, and each of these indices provides clinically relevant insight for predicting early postoperative outcomes in this high-risk patient population.

Effects of resident involvement on complication rates after laparoscopic gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Although resident involvement has been shown to be safe for most procedures, the impact of residents on outcomes after complex laparoscopic procedures is not well understood. We sought to examine the impact of resident involvement on outcomes after bariatric surgery using a population-based clinical registry.

STUDY DESIGN

We analyzed 17,057 patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic gastric bypass in the 35-hospital Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative from July 2006 to August 2012. Resident involvement was characterized at the surgeon level. Using hierarchical logistic regression, we examined the influence of resident involvement on 30-day complications, accounting for patient characteristics as well as hospital and surgeon case volume. To evaluate potential mediating factors for specific complications, we also adjusted for operative duration.

RESULTS

Risk-adjusted 30-day complication rates with and without residents were 13.0% and 8.5%, respectively (p < 0.01). Resident involvement was independently associated with wound infection (odds ratio [OR] = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.24-3.43) and venous thromboembolism (OR = 2.01; 95% CI, 1.19-3.40), but not with any other medical or surgical complications. Operative duration was longer with resident involvement (median duration with residents 129 minutes vs 88 minutes without; p < 0.01). After adjusting for operative duration, resident involvement was still independently associated with wound infection (OR = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.01-2.76), but not venous thromboembolism (OR = 1.73; 95% CI, 0.99-3.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Resident involvement in laparoscopic gastric bypass is independently associated with wound infections and venous thromboembolism. The effect appears to be mediated in part by longer operative times. These findings highlight the importance of strategies to assess and improve resident technical proficiency outside the operating room.

The impact of accreditation on safety and cost of bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to examine how much of the impact of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' national coverage decision (NCD) on bariatric surgery was driven by the restriction of reimbursements to Centers of Excellence (COE). We used inpatient care data of those with employer-sponsored insurance plans across United States using the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounter Database (2003-2009).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the impact of the accreditation on subjects with a difference-in-difference approach (removing the temporal changes occurring in non-COEs) on rates of inpatient mortality, 90-day reoperations, complications, readmissions, and total payments.

RESULTS

A total of 30,755 patients (43.9 ± 11.0 years; 79.9% women) had bariatric surgery. A total of 17,896 patients underwent procedures at sites that became COEs (8455 pre-NCD and 9441 post-NCD, [+10.4%]) compared with 12,859 at non-COEs (6534 pre-NCD and 6325 post-NCD, [-3.3%]). Of the total number of bariatric procedures, laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable band procedures increased from 42.9% and 3.1% pre-NCD to 64.5% and 19.7% post-NCD, respectively. In the COEs, there were reductions in inpatient mortality (.3% to .1%; P = .02), 90-day reoperations (.8% to .5%; P = .006), complications (36.4% to 27.6%; P<.001), and readmissions (10.8% to 8.8%; P<.001) while payments remained similar ($24,543 ± $40,145 to $24,510 ± $37,769; P = .9). After distinguishing from temporal trends and differences occurring at non-COEs, 90-day reoperation (-.8%; P = .02) and complication rates (-2.7%; P = .01) were lower at the COEs after the NCD.

CONCLUSIONS

The accreditation-based NCD in bariatric surgery was associated with lower rates of reoperations and complications. Such policies may become a powerful tool to improve surgical safety and quality.

Perioperative morbi-mortality associated with bariatric surgery: from systematic biliopancreatic diversion to a tailored laparoscopic gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy approach

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of the different bariatric surgical procedures currently available depend, partly, on the characteristics of the populations under study, the technical approach, the expertise of surgical teams, and on institutional factors. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these procedures, we compared the surgical results for biliopancreatic diversion surgery versus laparoscopic gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomies performed in our institution.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of 296 patients undergoing bariatric surgery from January 2005 through October 2010. We analyzed mortality rate, cardiocirculatory and pulmonary perioperative complications, duration of surgery, intensive care unit admissions, and length of stay. We describe the changes in the choice of the surgical procedures throughout the study period.

RESULTS

We observed a rate of pulmonary complications of 2.3 % and a mortality rate 3 months after discharge of 2.36 % with sepsis secondary to anastomotic leak as the main cause of death. Biliopancreatic diversion surgery was associated with higher mortality rates (p value = 0.014) and longer hospital stay (median of 9 versus 6 days for laparoscopic gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, p value <0.001). Body mass index ≥ 50 was also related to higher mortality (p value = 0.023). We confirmed a progressive increase in laparoscopic restrictive and mixed techniques in our institution (from 0 % in 2005 to 87 % of all procedures in 2010).

CONCLUSIONS

Bariatric surgery in our institution has dramatically shifted from systematic biliopancreatic diversion to a tailored laparoscopic gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy approach, which has made it possible to reduce hospital stay and mortality rates.

Volume-outcome association in bariatric surgery: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically examine the association between annual hospital and surgeon case volume and patient outcomes in bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery remains a technically demanding field with significant risk for morbidity and mortality. To mitigate this risk, minimum annual hospital and surgeon case volume requirements are being set and certain hospitals are being designated as "Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence." The effects of these interventions on patient outcomes remain unclear.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic review on volume-outcome association in bariatric surgery was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Evidence Based Medicine Reviews databases. Abstracts of identified articles were reviewed and pertinent full-text versions were retrieved. Manual search of bibliographies was performed and relevant studies were retrieved. Methodological quality assessment and data extraction were completed in a systematic fashion. Pooling of results was not feasible due to the heterogeneity of the studies. A qualitative summary of results is presented.

RESULTS

From a total of 2928 unique citations, 24 studies involving a total of 458,032 patients were selected for review. Two studies were prospective cohorts (level of evidence [LOE] 1), 3 were retrospective cohorts (LOE 3), 2 were retrospective case controls (LOE 3), and 17 were retrospective case series (LOE 4). The overall methodological quality of the reviewed studies was fair. A positive association between annual surgeon volume and patient outcomes was reported in 11 of 13 studies. A positive association between annual hospital volume and patient outcomes was reported in 14 of 17 studies.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence of improved patient outcomes in the hands of high-volume surgeons and high-volume centers. This study supports the concept of "Bariatric Surgery Center of Excellence" accreditation; however, future research into the quality of care characteristics of successful bariatric programs is recommended. Understanding the characteristics of high-volume surgeons, which lead to improved patient outcomes, also requires further investigation.

Pituitary Centers of Excellence

Pituitary tumors and associated neuroendocrine disorders pose significant challenges in diagnostic and therapeutic management. Optimal care of the “pituitary patient” is best provided in a multidisciplinary collaborative environment that includes not only experienced pituitary practitioners in neurosurgery and endocrinology, but also in otorhinolaryngological surgery, radiation oncology, medical oncology, neuro-ophthalmology, diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology, and neuropathology. We provide the background and rationale for recognizing pituitary centers of excellence and suggest a voluntary verification process, similar to that used by the American College of Surgeons for Trauma Center verification. We propose that pituitary centers of excellence should fulfill 3 key missions: (1) provide comprehensive care and support to patients with pituitary disorders; (2) provide residency training, fellowship training, and/or continuing medical education in the management of pituitary and neuroendocrine disease; and (3) contribute to research in pituitary disorders. As this is a preliminary proposal, we recognize several issues that warrant further consideration including center and surgeon practice volume as well as oversight of the verification process.