Post-Pancreatectomy Diabetes Index: A Validated Score Predicting Diabetes Development after Major Pancreatectomy

Pancreatic surgery and tertiary pancreatitis services warrant provision for support from a specialist diabetes team

Pancreatic surgery units undertake several complex operations, albeit with considerable morbidity and mortality, as is the case for the management of complicated acute pancreatitis or chronic pancreatitis. The centralisation of pancreatic surgery services, with the development of designated large-volume centres, has contributed to significantly improved outcomes. In this editorial, we discuss the complex associations between diabetes mellitus (DM) and pancreatic/periampullary disease in the context of pancreatic surgery and overall management of complex pancreatitis, highlighting the consequential needs and the indispensable role of specialist diabetes teams in support of tertiary pancreatic services. Type 3c pancreatogenic DM, refers to DM developing in the setting of exocrine pancreatic disease, and its identification and management can be challenging, while the glycaemic control of such patients may affect their course of treatment and outcome. Adequate preoperative diabetes assessment is warranted to aid identification of patients who are likely to need commencement or escalation of glucose lowering therapy in the postoperative period. The incidence of new onset diabetes after pancreatic resection is widely variable in the literature, and depends on the type and extent of pancreatic resection, as is the case with pancreatic parenchymal loss in the context of severe pancreatitis. Early involvement of a specialist diabetes team is essential to ensure a holistic management. In the current era, large volume pancreatic surgery services commonly abide by the principles of enhanced recovery after surgery, with inclusion of provisions for optimisation of the perioperative glycaemic control, to improve outcomes. While various guidelines are available to aid perioperative management of DM, auditing and quality improvement platforms have highlighted deficiencies in the perioperative management of diabetic patients and areas of required improvement. The need for perioperative support of diabetic patients by specialist diabetes teams is uniformly underlined, a fact that becomes clearly more prominent at all different stages in the setting of pancreatic surgery and the management of complex pancreatitis. Therefore, pancreatic surgery and tertiary pancreatitis services must be designed with a provision for support from specialist diabetes teams. With the ongoing accumulation of evidence, it would be reasonable to consider the design of specific guidelines for the glycaemic management of these patients.

Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease in Patients With Postpancreatectomy Diabetes and Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Postpancreatectomy diabetes can be caused by resection of functioning pancreatic tissue and is associated with postoperative pancreatic islet cell mass loss and subsequent endocrine dysfunction. Diabetes is a well-known risk factor for ischemic heart disease. However, no previous studies have investigated ischemic heart disease in patients with postpancreatectomy diabetes and pancreatic cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Rates of patients with diabetes diagnosed with pancreatic cancer who underwent pancreatectomy between 2002 and 2019 in South Korea were obtained from the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. Patient-level propensity score matching was conducted to reduce the possibility of selection bias, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between postpancreatectomy diabetes and ischemic heart disease. In total, 30 242 patients were initially enrolled in the study. After applying exclusion criteria and propensity score matching, 2952 patients were included in the comparative analysis between the postpancreatectomy group with diabetes and the group without diabetes. Patients in the postpancreatectomy group with diabetes had significantly higher rates of ischemic heart disease than those in the group without diabetes. In total, 3432 patients were included in the comparison between the postpancreatectomy and prepancreatectomy groups with diabetes. There was no significant difference in the risk of ischemic heart disease between the postpancreatectomy and prepancreatectomy groups with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who developed diabetes after pancreatectomy had a higher risk of ischemic heart disease than patients who did not develop diabetes after pancreatectomy, and the rate of ischemic heart disease in these patients was similar to that in patients preoperatively diagnosed with diabetes.

Glucose Regulation after Partial Pancreatectomy: A Comparison of Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Distal Pancreatectomy in the Short and Long Term

BACKGRUOUND

Long term quality of life is becoming increasingly crucial as survival following partial pancreatectomy rises. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in glucose dysregulation after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP).

METHODS

In this prospective observational study from 2015 to 2018, 224 patients who underwent partial pancreatectomy were selected: 152 (67.9%) received PD and 72 (32.1%) received DP. Comprehensive assessment for glucose regulation, including a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test was conducted preoperatively, and 1, 12, and 52 weeks after surgery. Patients were further monitored up to 3 years to investigate development of new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) in patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) at baseline or worsening of glucose regulation (≥1% increase in glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c]) in those with preexisting DM.

RESULTS

The disposition index, an integrated measure of β-cell function, decreased 1 week after surgery in both groups, but it increased more than baseline level in the PD group while its decreased level was maintained in the DP group, resulting in a between-group difference at the 1-year examination (P<0.001). During follow-up, the DP group showed higher incidence of NODM and worsening of glucose regulation than the PD group with hazard ratio (HR) 4.29 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49 to 12.3) and HR 2.15 (95% CI, 1.09 to 4.24), respectively, in the multivariate analysis including dynamic glycemic excursion profile. In the DP procedure, distal DP and spleen preservation were associated with better glucose regulation. DP had a stronger association with glucose dysregulation than PD.

CONCLUSION

Proactive surveillance of glucose dysregulation is advised, particularly for patients who receive DP.

Innovation in the Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: Same Operations, Narrower Indications, and an Individualized Approach to Decision-Making

Historically, the management of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN) has been operative. Early intervention for premalignant lesions, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) and mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCN), offers an opportunity to prevent pancreatic cancer-with potential decrement to patients' short-term and long-term health. The operations performed have remained fundamentally the same, with most patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy using oncologic principles. The role of parenchymal-sparing resection and total pancreatectomy remains controversial. We review innovations in the surgical management of PCN, focusing on the evolution of evidence-based guidelines, short-term and long-term outcomes, and individualized risk-benefit assessment.

Diagnóstico y tratamiento del traumatismo de páncreas

Pancreatic trauma is a rare but potentially lethal entity which requires a high level of clinical suspicion. Early diagnosis and assessment of the integrity of the pancreatic duct are essential since ductal injury is a crucial predictor of morbimortality. Overall mortality is 19%, which can rise to 30% in cases of ductal injury. The diagnostic and therapeutic approach is multidisciplinary and guided by a surgeon, imaging specialist and ICU physician. Laboratory analysis shows that pancreatic enzymes are frequently elevated, which is a low specificity finding. In hemodynamically stable patients, the posttraumatic condition of the pancreas is firstly evaluated by the multidetector computed tomography. Moreover, in case of suspicion of ductal injury, more sensitive studies such as Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography or cholangioresonance are needed. This narrative review aims to analyze the etiopathogenesis and pathophysiology of pancreatic trauma and discuss its diagnosis and treatment. Also, the most clinically relevant complications will be summarized.

Pancreatogenic Diabetes after Partial Pancreatectomy: A Common and Understudied Cause of Morbidity

BACKGROUND

Partial pancreatic resection is a known risk factor for new-onset pancreatogenic diabetes mellitus (P-DM). The long-term incidence of P-DM and its clinical impact after partial pancreatic resection remains unknown. The primary objective of this study is to determine the long-term incidence of P-DM and its clinical impact after partial pancreatic resection.

STUDY DESIGN

The Medicare 100% Standard Analytic File (2013 to 2017) was queried for all patients who underwent partial pancreatic resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy). The primary outcome was the development of postoperative P-DM after surgery.

RESULTS

Among 4,255 patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy, with a median follow-up of 10.8 months, the incidence of P-DM was 20.3% (n=863) and occurred at a median of 3.6 months after surgery. For patients with at least a 3-year follow-up, 32.2% of patients developed P-DM. Risk factors for developing P-DM included male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.54), undergoing a distal pancreatectomy (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.68 to 2.35), having a malignant diagnosis (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.04), a family history of diabetes (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.97; all p < 0.001), and being classified as prediabetic in the preoperative setting (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.08; p = 0.002). Patients who developed P-DM were more commonly readmitted within 90 days of surgery and had higher postoperative healthcare expenditures in the year after surgery ($24,440 US dollars vs $16,130 US dollars; both p < 0.001) vs patients without P-DM.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 1 in 5 Medicare beneficiaries who undergo a pancreatic resection develop P-DM after pancreatic resection. Appropriate screening and improved patient education should be conducted for these patients, in particular, for those with identified risk factors.

Three-Year Observation of Glucose Metabolism After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Center Prospective Study in Japan

CONTEXT

The glucose tolerance of patients changes considerably from before to after pancreaticoduodenectomy wherein approximately half of the pancreas is resected.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for diabetes after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

METHODS

This study is a part of an ongoing prospective study, the Kindai Prospective Study on Metabolism and Endocrinology after Pancreatectomy (KIP-MEP) study. Of the 457 patients enrolled to date, 96 patients without diabetes who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were investigated in this study. Preoperatively, 1 month post-pancreaticoduodenectomy, and every 6 months thereafter, the glucose metabolism and endocrine function were evaluated using the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. Various other metabolic, endocrine, and exocrine indices were also examined over a period of up to 36 months.

RESULTS

Of the 96 patients analyzed in this study, 33 were newly diagnosed with diabetes. The cumulative diabetes incidence at 36 months following pancreaticoduodenectomy was 53.8%. The preoperative insulinogenic index and ΔC-peptide in the glucagon stimulation test were significantly lower in the progressors to diabetes than in the nonprogressors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that the insulinogenic index was the only significant risk factor for new-onset diabetes.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients developed new-onset diabetes after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and a low value of the insulinogenic index was suggested to be a risk factor for diabetes. Preoperative assessment for the prediction of the onset of diabetes serves as useful information for patients and is important for postoperative glycemic control and diabetes management in patients who require pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Is endocrine and exocrine function improved following duodenal preserving pancreatic head resection over whipple for chronic pancreatitis?

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to evaluate the rates of treatment for post-operative exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) and diabetes mellites (DM) between Duodenal Preserving Pancreatic Head Resections (DPPHR) and Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) from a prospectively maintained database of patients with chronic pancreatitis.

METHODS

104 patients were identified for inclusion, 62 of whom underwent DPPHR and 42 underwent PD. Study endpoints included changes in treatment for EPI and DM.

RESULTS

In the DPPHR group, the vast majority (n = 55) received a Frey procedure, with a small minority of patients undergoing a Beger procedure (n = 4) or Berne modification (n = 3). Patients in the DPPHR group had a lower rate of new persistent treatment for EPI post-operatively compared to patients who underwent PD (28.0% vs. 76.5%, p = 0.002). There was no difference in the rate of new onset DM, with low rates of new insulin dependent diabetics in both groups. Both groups had equal efficacy in terms of pain control, with 67.7% of the DPPHR group and 61.9% of the PD group remaining opioid free at long-term follow-up (p = 0.539).

CONCLUSION

In patients with head-predominant chronic pancreatitis, DPPHR was associated with reduced rates of new EPI treatment and similar endocrine function compared with PD.

Perioperative C-peptide index is associated with the status of diabetes management after pancreatectomy

Aims/Introduction

This study aimed to identify the clinical factors affecting postoperative residual pancreatic β‐cell function, as assessed by the C‐peptide index (CPI), and to investigate the association between perioperative CPI and the status of diabetes management after pancreatectomy.

Materials and Methods

The associations between perioperative CPI and clinical background, including surgical procedures of pancreatectomy, were analyzed in 47 patients who underwent pancreatectomy, and were assessed for pre‐and postoperative CPI. The association between perioperative CPI and glycemic control after pancreatectomy was investigated.

Results

The low postoperative CPI group (CPI <0.7) had longer duration of diabetes (17.5 ± 14.5 vs 5.5 ± 11.0 years, P = 0.004), a higher percentage of sulfonylurea users (41.7 vs 8.7%, P = 0.003) and a greater number of drug categories used for diabetes treatment (1.9 ± 1.1 vs 0.8 ± 0.8, P <0.001) than did the high postoperative CPI group. Postoperative CPI was higher (1.4 ± 1.2 vs 0.7 ± 0.6, P = 0.039) in patients with low glycosylated hemoglobin (<7.0%) at 6 months after pancreatectomy; preoperative (2.0 ± 1.5 vs 0.7 ± 0.5, P = 0.012) and postoperative CPI (2.5 ± 1.4 vs 1.4 ± 1.1, P = 0.020) were higher in non‐insulin users than in insulin users at 6 months after surgery.

Conclusions

The duration of diabetes and preoperative diabetes treatment were associated with residual pancreatic β‐cell function after pancreatectomy. Furthermore, perioperative β‐cell function as assessed by CPI was associated with diabetes management status after pancreatectomy.

Stationäre Patienten mit der Nebendiagnose Diabetes mellitus: klinische Relevanz

In deutschen Krankenhäusern werden jährlich etwa 3 Mio. Patienten mit Diabetes stationär behandelt, davon 93 % nicht wegen, sondern mit dieser Erkrankung. In einzelnen Fachabteilungen liegt bei bis zu 40 % der Patienten die Nebendiagnose Diabetes vor. Sie haben oft eine relevante Komorbidität und im Vergleich zu Krankenhauspatienten ohne Diabetes eine längere stationäre Verweildauer, entwickeln deutlich häufiger Komplikationen und müssen öfter kurzfristig wieder aufgenommen werden. In dieser Übersicht wird die klinische Relevanz der Nebendiagnose Diabetes mellitus für Krankenhauspatienten besprochen.

Hemoglobin A1c Is a Predictor of New Insulin Dependence After Partial Pancreatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Analysis

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic diseases have long been associated with impaired glucose control. This study sought to identify the incidence of new insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) after pancreatectomy and the predictive accuracy of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) or blood glucose.

METHODS

Patients who underwent partial pancreatectomy and had preoperative HbA1c available at two academic institutions were assessed for new IDDM on discharge in relation to complication rates and survival.

RESULTS

Of the 267 patients analyzed, 67% had abnormal HbA1c levels prior to surgery (mean 6.8%, glucose 135 mg/dL). Two hundred eight (77.9%) were not insulin-dependent prior to surgery, and 35 (16.8%) developed new IDDM after resection. On multivariable regression, increasing HbA1c and preoperative glucose were the only significant predictors for new IDDM. Optimal predictive cutoffs (HbA1c of 6.25% and glucose of 121 mg/dL) were determined in a discovery group (n = 143) and confirmed in a validation group (n = 124) with a diagnostic sensitivity of 72.7% and specificity of 84.8%. Patients with new IDDM after resection had higher rates of severe complications (OR 3.39), increased TPN at discharge (OR 4.32), and increased rates of discharge to nursing facilities (OR 2.57) (all P < 0.05). New IDDM was also associated with a decreased cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative HbA1c ≥ 6.25% and blood glucose ≥ 121 mg/dL can accurately identify patients at increased risk of IDDM. These diagnostics may help identify patients in a preoperative setting that may benefit from interventions such as diabetes education or enhanced glucose control preoperatively.

Phakomatoses and Endocrine Gland Tumors: Noteworthy and (Not so) Rare Associations

Phakomatoses encompass a group of rare genetic diseases, such as von Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL), neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and Cowden syndrome (CS). These disorders are due to molecular abnormalities on the RAS-PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway for NF1, TSC and CS, and to hypoxia sensing for VHL. Phakomatoses share some phenotypic traits such as neurological, ophthalmological and cutaneous features. Patients with these diseases are also predisposed to developing multiple endocrine tissue tumors, e.g., pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas are frequent in VHL and NF1. All forms of phakomatoses except CS may be associated with digestive neuroendocrine tumors. More rarely, thyroid cancer and pituitary or parathyroid adenomas have been reported. These susceptibilities are noteworthy, because their occurrence rate, prognosis and management differ slightly from the sporadic forms. The aim of this review is to summarize current knowledge on endocrine glands tumors associated with VHL, NF1, TSC, and CS, especially neuroendocrine tumors and pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas. We particularly detail recent advances concerning prognosis and management, especially parenchyma-sparing surgery and medical targeted therapies such as mTOR, MEK and HIF-2 α inhibitors, which have shown truly encouraging results.

Redefining the tail of pancreas based on the islets microarchitecture and inter-islet distance: An immunohistochemical study

ABSTRACT

Researchers divided the pancreas distal to the neck into 2 equal parts as the body and tail region by an arbitrary line. Surgeons considered the part of the pancreas, left to the aorta as the tail region. We performed this study to identify the transition zone of low-density to high-density islet cells for redefining the tail region.We quantified islets area proportion, beta-cell area proportion, and inter-islet distance in 9 Indian-adult-human non-diabetic pancreases from autopsy by using anti-synaptophysin and anti-insulin antibodies. Data were categorized under 3 regions like the proximal body, distal body, and distal part of the pancreas.Islet and beta-cell area proportion are progressively increased from head to tail region of the pancreas with a significant reduction in inter-islet distance and beta-cell percentage distal to the aorta. There is no significant difference in inter-islet distance and beta-cell percentage of the distal part of the body and tail region.Crowding of islets with intermingled microarchitecture begins in the pancreas distal to the aorta, which may be the beginning of the actual tail region. This study will provide insight into the preservation of islets-rich part of the pancreas during pancreatectomy and future prediction of new-onset diabetes.

Insulinbedarf und Glukosehomöostase bei Menschen nach partieller und totaler Pankreatektomie im Vergleich zu Menschen mit anderen Diabetesformen

Einleitung Pankreasresektionen werden bei schwerwiegenden Pankreaserkrankungen durchgeführt. Bei Komplikationen einer chronischen Pankreatitis, teilweise jedoch auch bei Raumforderungen, kann eine Pankreasteilresektion sinnvoll sein. Eine totale Pankreatektomie führt zum absoluten Insulinmangel und der Notwendigkeit einer Insulintherapie. Bei Teilresektionen (partielle Pankreatektomie) werden weniger gravierende Konsequenzen für den Glukosemetabolismus erwartet. Es ist das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit, die Insulinregime nach Pankreatektomie mit denen anderer Diabetesformen zu vergleichen.

Material und Methodik Es wurden Patientencharakteristika und Details der postoperativen Insulintherapie von pankreasoperierten Patienten einer spezialisierten Universitätsklinik für Viszeralchirurgie ausgewertet. Diese Daten wurden mit Kohorten nicht operierter Patienten mit Typ-1-Diabetes (T1DM; absoluter Insulinmangel) bzw. Typ-2-Diabetes (T2DM; Insulinresistenz und relativer Insulinmangel), jeweils unter Insulintherapie, verglichen. Ergänzt wurde diese Datenanalyse durch eine Literaturrecherche zu den Stichworten „pancreatogenic diabetes“, „type 3c diabetes“ und „pancreatectomy diabetes“.

Ergebnisse Daten von 32 (68,8 % Frauenanteil) bzw. 41 (43,9 % Frauenanteil) Patienten nach totaler bzw. partieller Pankreatektomie wurden analysiert. Vor der totalen Pankreatektomie hatten 56,3 % der Patienten einen Diabetes mellitus, postoperativ bestand bei allen Patienten eine Insulinpflichtigkeit. Dabei waren die Insulindosierungen im Vergleich mit Patienten mit T1DM (unter intensivierter Insulintherapie) signifikant niedriger (p < 0,0001). Die Dosierungen von Basal- (48,6 % weniger) und Mahlzeiteninsulin (38,1 % weniger) waren gleichermaßen betroffen. Eine partielle Pankreatektomie führte deutlich seltener zu einem Diabetes mellitus, und eine Insulintherapie war nur bei 26,8 % der Patienten erforderlich.

Diskussion Der basale und prandiale Insulinbedarf nach Pankreatektomie ist niedriger als bei einem T1DM und einem T2DM. Dies sollte bei der Blutzuckereinstellung nach Pankreatektomie berücksichtigt werden.