Inpatient Care for Nursing Home Patients: An Opportunity to Improve Transitional Care

Cultural and Ethical Barriers to Cancer Treatment in Nursing Homes and Educational Strategies: A Scoping Review

(1) Background: The aging of the population, the increase in the incidence of cancer with age, and effective chronic oncological treatments all lead to an increased prevalence of cancer in nursing homes. The aim of the present study was to map the cultural and ethical barriers associated with the treatment of cancer and educational strategies in this setting. (2) Methods: A systematic scoping review was conducted until April 2021 in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. All articles assessing continuum of care, paramedical education, and continuing education in the context of older cancer patients in nursing homes were reviewed. (3) Results: A total of 666 articles were analyzed, of which 65 studies were included. Many factors interfering with the decision to investigate and treat, leading to late- or unstaged disease, palliative-oriented care instead of curative, and a higher risk of unjustified transfers to acute care settings, were identified. The educational strategies explored in this context were generally based on training programs. (4) Conclusions: These results will allow the co-construction of educational tools intended to develop knowledge and skills to improve diagnostic and therapeutic decision-making, the consistency of care, and, ultimately, the quality of life of older cancer patients in nursing homes.

Residential and nursing homes: how can they meet the challenge of an aging population?

A rapidly aging society presents important challenges to care homes. Faced with increasingly elderly residents and progressively more complex clinical and social care needs, nursing and residential homes will have to address a number of issues. These include: how to maintain residents’ quality of life as well as quality of care; how to integrate health and social care provision; how best to manage their interface with hospitals in order to prevent avoidable hospitalizations and facilitate early discharges; and how to utilize new technology in a cost-effective manner. This review examines evidence from across the world on how care home placements can evolve to meet these challenges, with discussion largely adopting a UK perspective. The evidence on innovative ways of working to achieve such aims is growing, although slowly. The potential for new technologies to maintain quality and contain costs is significantly under-developed. More research is now needed.

Transitions in long-term care and potential implications for quality reporting in Ontario, Canada

PURPOSE

To describe the proportion of long-term care (LTC) residents excluded from quality measurement because of standard length of stay inclusion criteria and the extent to which this varies across facilities.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A 2005 province-wide census of LTC residents' charts was linked to additional databases from Ontario, Canada. The proportion of residents who were newly admitted (≤90 days) and who exited the facility within 90 days were identified and interfacility variation in each was described.

RESULTS

Of the 68,930 residents in 574 facilities, 5363 (7.8%) were admitted in the prior 90 days and 7833 (11.4%) were discharged in the subsequent 90 days. Overall, 55,734 (80.4%) residents were neither admitted nor discharged within 90 days and were defined as "stable"; however, this ranged from 67.2% to 95.1% across facilities.

IMPLICATIONS

Stable residents are the focus of most quality measurement in LTC but transitioning residents are an important part of the caseload for these facilities. In Ontario, transitioning residents accounted for 20% of the population but there was substantial variation in this proportion across facilities. This raises concerns about the comprehensiveness and comparability of publicly reported quality indicators for a population with frequent transitions in Ontario and elsewhere.

Transfer from residential aged care to emergency departments: an analysis of patient outcomes

BACKGROUND

In order to design optimal systems to meet the acute healthcare needs of the frail elderly living in residential care, good clinical information is essential. The aims of this study were to analyse the casemix and outcomes of patients transferred from residential aged care facilities to public hospital emergency departments in New South Wales.

METHODS

Individual patient data from six hospital emergency departments and inpatient wards were obtained from merged databases and analysed using descriptive and comparative statistics.

RESULTS

Outcomes in 4680 patient transfers over a 12-month period in 2006-2007 were analysed. Transfers occur mostly in high-acuity patients, with approximately three of every four transfers admitted; one in every 12 dying; and admitted patients undergoing an average of 2.4 interventions or procedures during each hospital stay. Several variables are associated with prolonged length of emergency department stay including triage urgency, type of hospital and transfers occurring in winter or out of hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients transferred from aged care facilities to emergency departments are predominantly high-acuity patients with a substantial likelihood of hospitalisation, intervention and death. Nevertheless, scope exists for some episodes of acute care, in both discharged and admitted patients, to be provided outside a hospital setting.

In-reach specialist nursing teams for residential care homes: uptake of services, impact on care provision and cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND

A joint NHS-Local Authority initiative in England designed to provide a dedicated nursing and physiotherapy in-reach team (IRT) to four residential care homes has been evaluated. The IRT supported 131 residents and maintained 15 'virtual' beds for specialist nursing in these care homes.

METHODS

Data captured prospectively (July 2005 to June 2007) included: numbers of referrals; reason for referral; outcome (e.g. admission to IRT bed, short-term IRT support); length of stay in IRT; prevented hospital admissions; early hospital discharges; avoided nursing home transfers; and detection of unrecognised illnesses. An economic analysis was undertaken.

RESULTS

733 referrals were made during the 2 years (range 0.5 to 13.0 per resident per annum) resulting in a total of 6,528 visits. Two thirds of referrals aimed at maintaining the resident's independence in the care home. According to expert panel assessment, 197 hospital admissions were averted over the period; 20 early discharges facilitated; and 28 resident transfers to a nursing home prevented. Detection of previously unrecognised illnesses accounted for a high number of visits. Investment in IRT equalled 44.38 pounds per resident per week. Savings through reduced hospital admissions, early discharges, delayed transfers to nursing homes, and identification of previously unrecognised illnesses are conservatively estimated to produce a final reduction in care cost of 6.33 pounds per resident per week. A sensitivity analysis indicates this figure might range from a weekly overall saving of 36.90 pounds per resident to a 'worst case' estimate of 2.70 pounds extra expenditure per resident per week.Evaluation early in implementation may underestimate some cost-saving activities and greater savings may emerge over a longer time period. Similarly, IRT costs may reduce over time due to the potential for refinement of team without major loss in effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of a specialist nursing in-reach team for residential homes is at least cost neutral and, in all probability, cost saving. Further benefits include development of new skills in the care home workforce and enhanced quality of care. Residents are enabled to stay in familiar surroundings rather than unnecessarily spending time in hospital or being transferred to a higher dependency nursing home setting.