1
|
Conlin M, Hamard M, Agrinier N, Birgand G. Assessment of implementation strategies adopted for antimicrobial stewardship interventions in long-term care facilities: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2024; 30:431-444. [PMID: 38141820 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is influenced by multi-level factors (resident, organizational, and external) making their effectiveness sensitive to the implementation context. OBJECTIVES This study assessed the strategies adopted for the implementation of AMS interventions in LTCFs, whether they considered organizational characteristics, and their effectiveness. DATA SOURCES Electronic databases until April 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Articles covering implementation of AMS interventions in LTCFs. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool for empirical studies. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS Data were collected on AMS interventions and context characteristics (e.g. type of facility, staffing, and residents). Implementation strategies and outcomes were mapped according to the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework and validated taxonomy for implementation outcomes. Implementation and clinical effectiveness were assessed according to the primary and secondary outcomes results provided in each study. RESULTS Among 48 studies included in the analysis, 19 (40%) used implementation strategies corresponding to one to three ERIC domains, including education and training (n = 36/48, 75%), evaluative and iterative strategies (n = 24/48, 50%), and support clinicians (n = 23/48, 48%). Only 8/48 (17%) studies made use of implementation theories, frameworks, or models. Fidelity and sustainability were reported respectively in 21 (70%) and 3 (10%) of 27 studies providing implementation outcomes. Implementation strategy was considered effective in 11/27 (41%) studies, mainly including actions to improve use (n = 6/11, 54%) and education (n = 4/11, 36%). Of the 42 interventions, 18/42 (43%) were deemed clinically effective. Among 21 clinically effective studies, implementation was deemed effective in four and partially effective in five. Two studies were clinically effective despite having non-effective implementation. CONCLUSIONS The effectiveness of AMS interventions in LTCFs largely differed according to the interventions' content and implementation strategies adopted. Implementation frameworks should be considered to adapt and tailor interventions and strategies to the local context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michèle Conlin
- Regional Center for Infection Prevention and Control Pays de la Loire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Marie Hamard
- Unité de gériatrie Aiguë, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, Paris, France
| | - Nelly Agrinier
- Université de Lorraine, Inserm, INSPIIRE, F-54000 Nancy, France; CHRU-Nancy, Inserm, Université de Lorraine, CIC, Epidémiologie clinique, Nancy, France.
| | - Gabriel Birgand
- Regional Center for Infection Prevention and Control Pays de la Loire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France; National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance at Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Taylor LN, Wilson BM, Singh M, Irvine J, Jolles SA, Kowal C, Bej TA, Crnich CJ, Jump RLP. Syndromic Antibiograms and Nursing Home Clinicians' Antibiotic Choices for Urinary Tract Infections. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2349544. [PMID: 38150250 PMCID: PMC10753399 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.49544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Empirical antibiotic prescribing in nursing homes (NHs) is often suboptimal. The potential for antibiograms to improve empirical antibiotic decision-making in NHs remains poorly understood. Objective To determine whether providing NH clinicians with a urinary antibiogram improves empirical antibiotic treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Design, Setting, and Participants This was a survey study using clinical vignettes. Participants were recruited via convenience sampling of professional organization listservs of NH clinicians practicing in the US from December 2021 through April 2022. Data were analyzed from July 2022 to June 2023. Interventions Respondents were randomized to complete vignettes using a traditional antibiogram (TA), a weighted-incidence syndromic combination antibiogram (WISCA), or no tool. Participants randomized to antibiogram groups were asked to use the antibiogram to empirically prescribe an antibiotic. Participants randomized to the no tool group functioned as controls. Main Outcomes and Measures Empirical antibiotic selections were characterized as microbiologically (1) active and (2) optimal according to route of administration and spectrum of activity. Results Of 317 responses, 298 (95%) were included in the analysis. Duplicate responses (15 participants), location outside the US (2 participants), and uninterpretable responses (2 participants) were excluded. Most respondents were physicians (217 respondents [73%]) and had over 10 years of NH practice experience (155 respondents [52%]). A mixed-effects logistic model found that use of the TA (odds ratio [OR], 1.41; 95% CI, 1.19-1.68; P < .001) and WISCA (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.30-1.84; P < .001) were statistically superior to no tool when choosing an active empirical antibiotic. A similarly constructed model found that use of the TA (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.42-2.66; P < .001) and WISCA (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.24-2.33; P = .003) were statistically superior to no tool when selecting an optimal empirical antibiotic. Although there were differences between tools within specific vignettes, when compared across all vignettes, the TA and WISCA performed similarly for active (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.92-1.30; P = .59) and optimal (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.64-1.20; P = .69) antibiotics. Conclusions and Relevance Providing NH clinicians with a urinary antibiogram was associated with selection of active and optimal antibiotics when empirically treating UTIs under simulated conditions. Although the antibiogram format was not associated with decision-making in aggregate, context-specific effects may have been present, supporting further study of syndromic antibiograms in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsay N. Taylor
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
- William S. Middleton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Madison
- University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison
| | - Brigid M. Wilson
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland
- Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine in the Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Mriganka Singh
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert School of Medicine at Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Jessica Irvine
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
| | - Sally A. Jolles
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
| | | | - Taissa A. Bej
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Affairs Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland
- Division of Infectious Diseases and HIV Medicine in the Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Christopher J. Crnich
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
- William S. Middleton Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Madison
- University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison
| | - Robin L. P. Jump
- TECH-GRECC, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bloch N, Männer J, Gardiol C, Kohler P, Kuhn J, Münzer T, Schlegel M, Kuster SP, Flury D. Effective infection prevention and control measures in long-term care facilities in non-outbreak and outbreak settings: a systematic literature review. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2023; 12:113. [PMID: 37853477 PMCID: PMC10585745 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-023-01318-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthcare-associated infections in long-term care are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. While infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines are well-defined in the acute care setting, evidence of effectiveness for long-term care facilities (LTCF) is missing. We therefore performed a systematic literature review to examine the effect of IPC measures in the long-term care setting. METHODS We systematically searched PubMed and Cochrane libraries for articles evaluating the effect of IPC measures in the LTCF setting since 2017, as earlier reviews on this topic covered the timeframe up to this date. Cross-referenced studies from identified articles and from mentioned earlier reviews were also evaluated. We included randomized-controlled trials, quasi-experimental, observational studies, and outbreak reports. The included studies were analyzed regarding study design, type of intervention, description of intervention, outcomes and quality. We distinguished between non-outbreak and outbreak settings. RESULTS We included 74 studies, 34 (46%) in the non-outbreak setting and 40 (54%) in the outbreak setting. The most commonly studied interventions in the non-outbreak setting included the effect of hand hygiene (N = 10), oral hygiene (N = 6), antimicrobial stewardship (N = 4), vaccination of residents (N = 3), education (N = 2) as well as IPC bundles (N = 7). All but one study assessing hand hygiene interventions reported a reduction of infection rates. Further successful interventions were oral hygiene (N = 6) and vaccination of residents (N = 3). In outbreak settings, studies mostly focused on the effects of IPC bundles (N = 24) or mass testing (N = 11). In most of the studies evaluating an IPC bundle, containment of the outbreak was reported. Overall, only four articles (5.4%) were rated as high quality. CONCLUSION In the non-outbreak setting in LTCF, especially hand hygiene and oral hygiene have a beneficial effect on infection rates. In contrast, IPC bundles, as well as mass testing seem to be promising in an outbreak setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nando Bloch
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland.
| | - Jasmin Männer
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | | | - Philipp Kohler
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Jacqueline Kuhn
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Münzer
- Geriatrische Klinik St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Schlegel
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Stefan P Kuster
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Domenica Flury
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Cantonal Hospital St.Gallen, St.Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Antibiotic postprescribing modification opportunities among nursing home residents treated for urinary tract infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022:1-6. [DOI: 10.1017/ice.2022.202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective:
To characterize opportunities to postprescriptively modify antibiotic prescriptions initiated for treatment of suspected urinary tract infection (UTI) in nursing homes.
Design:
Cross-sectional cohort study.
Methods:
Data from the health records of residents treated for UTI between 2013 and 2014 in 5 Wisconsin nursing homes were abstracted using a structured approach. Explicit definitions were used to identify whether the prescribed antibiotic could have been stopped, shortened, or changed to a nonfluoroquinolone alternative. Antibiotic treatments appropriately modified by study nursing home providers in real time were not considered modifiable. Identification of >1 potential modification opportunity (eg, stop and shorten) per antibiotic treatment event was permitted.
Results:
In total, 356 eligible antibiotic treatment courses among 249 unique residents were identified. Only 59 antibiotic courses prescribed for treatment of suspected UTI (16.6%) were not amenable to any modification. Discontinuation of treatment due to lack of signs or symptoms of infection was the most frequently identified potential modification opportunity (66.2%). Although less common, substantial numbers of antibiotic treatment courses were potentially amenable to shortening (34%) or agent change (19%) modifications. If applied in concert at 72 hours after antibiotic initiation, stop and shorten modifications could eradicate up to 1,326 avoidable antibiotic days, and change modifications could remove a 32 remaining avoidable fluoroquinolone days.
Conclusions:
Substantial opportunity exists to enhance the quality of antibiotic prescribing for treatment of suspected UTI in nursing homes through postprescriptive review interventions. Additional studies examining how to best design and implement postprescriptive review interventions in nursing homes are needed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Combined Training Intervention Targeting Medical and Nursing Staff Reduces Ciprofloxacin Use and Events of Urinary Tract Infection. Adv Urol 2022; 2022:2474242. [PMID: 35450116 PMCID: PMC9017541 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2474242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Inappropriate diagnosis of urinary tract infections (UTI) contributes to antimicrobial overuse. A combined training intervention for medical and nursing staff mainly addressing the analytic process reduced UTI events (9.20 vs. 7.36 per 1000 PD, −20.0%, p = 0.003) and the utilization rate of ciprofloxacin (11.6 vs. 3.5, −69.6 p = 0.001) in a Bavarian University Hospital. Combined training intervention—as part of an antibiotic stewardship program—can be effective in avoiding unnecessary urinalysis and reducing antibiotic consumption.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gontjes KJ, Gibson KE, Lansing BJ, Mantey J, Jones KM, Cassone M, Wang J, Mills JP, Mody L, Patel PK. Association of Exposure to High-risk Antibiotics in Acute Care Hospitals With Multidrug-Resistant Organism Burden in Nursing Homes. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2144959. [PMID: 35103795 PMCID: PMC8808331 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.44959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Little is known about the contribution of hospital antibiotic prescribing to multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) burden in nursing homes (NHs). OBJECTIVES To characterize antibiotic exposures across the NH patient's health care continuum (preceding health care exposure and NH stay) and to investigate whether recent antibiotic exposure is associated with MDRO colonization and room environment contamination at NH study enrollment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This is a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study (conducted from 2013-2016) that enrolled NH patients and followed them up for as long as 6 months. The study was conducted in 6 NHs in Michigan among NH patients who were enrolled within 14 days of admission. Clinical metadata abstraction, multi-anatomical site screening, and room environment surveillance for MDROs were conducted at each study visit. Data were analyzed between May 2019 and November 2021. EXPOSURES Antibiotic data were abstracted from NH electronic medical records by trained research staff and characterized by class, route, indication, location of therapy initiation, risk for Clostridioides difficile infection (C diffogenic agents), and 2019 World Health Organization Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWARE) antibiotic stewardship framework categories. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomes were MDRO colonization and MDRO room environment contamination at NH study enrollment, measured using standard microbiology methods. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify whether antibiotic exposure within 60 days was associated with MDRO burden at NH study enrollment. Additionally, antibiotic exposure data were characterized using descriptive statistics. RESULTS A total of 642 patients were included (mean [SD] age, 74.7 [12.2] years; 369 [57.5%] women; 402 [62.6%] White; median [IQR] NH days to enrollment, 6.0 [3.0-7.0]). Of these, 422 (65.7%) received 1191 antibiotic exposures: 368 (57.3%) received 971 hospital-associated prescriptions, and 119 (18.5%) received 198 NH-associated prescriptions. Overall, 283 patients (44.1%) received at least 1 C diffogenic agent, and 322 (50.2%) received at least 1 high-risk WHO AWARE antibiotic (watch or reserve agent). More than half of NH patients (364 [56.7%]) and room environments (437 [68.1%]) had MDRO-positive results at enrollment. In multivariable analysis, recent antibiotic exposure was positively associated with baseline MDRO colonization (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.22-2.38) and MDRO environmental contamination (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.17-2.39). Exploratory stratification by C diffogenic agent exposure increased the effect size (MDRO colonization: OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.33-2.96; MDRO environmental contamination: OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.24-2.79). Likewise, exploratory stratification by exposure to high-risk WHO AWARE antibiotics increased the effect size (MDRO colonization: OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.61-3.36; MDRO environmental contamination: OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.26-2.75). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this study suggest that high-risk, hospital-based antibiotics are a potentially high-value target to reduce MDROs in postacute care NHs. This study underscores the potential utility of integrated hospital and NH stewardship programming on regional MDRO epidemiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle J. Gontjes
- Division of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor
- Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Kristen E. Gibson
- Division of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Bonnie J. Lansing
- Division of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Julia Mantey
- Division of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Karen M. Jones
- Division of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Marco Cassone
- Division of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Joyce Wang
- Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - John P. Mills
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| | - Lona Mody
- Division of Geriatric & Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Payal K. Patel
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Raban MZ, Gates PJ, Gasparini C, Westbrook JI. Temporal and regional trends of antibiotic use in long-term aged care facilities across 39 countries, 1985-2019: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0256501. [PMID: 34424939 PMCID: PMC8382177 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotic misuse is a key contributor to antimicrobial resistance and a concern in long-term aged care facilities (LTCFs). Our objectives were to: i) summarise key indicators of systemic antibiotic use and appropriateness of use, and ii) examine temporal and regional variations in antibiotic use, in LTCFs (PROSPERO registration CRD42018107125). METHODS & FINDINGS Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies published between 1990-2021 reporting antibiotic use rates in LTCFs. Random effects meta-analysis provided pooled estimates of antibiotic use rates (percentage of residents on an antibiotic on a single day [point prevalence] and over 12 months [period prevalence]; percentage of appropriate prescriptions). Meta-regression examined associations between antibiotic use, year of measurement and region. A total of 90 articles representing 78 studies from 39 countries with data between 1985-2019 were included. Pooled estimates of point prevalence and 12-month period prevalence were 5.2% (95% CI: 3.3-7.9; n = 523,171) and 62.0% (95% CI: 54.0-69.3; n = 946,127), respectively. Point prevalence varied significantly between regions (Q = 224.1, df = 7, p<0.001), and ranged from 2.4% (95% CI: 1.9-2.7) in Eastern Europe to 9.0% in the British Isles (95% CI: 7.6-10.5) and Northern Europe (95% CI: 7.7-10.5). Twelve-month period prevalence varied significantly between regions (Q = 15.1, df = 3, p = 0.002) and ranged from 53.9% (95% CI: 48.3-59.4) in the British Isles to 68.3% (95% CI: 63.6-72.7) in Australia. Meta-regression found no association between year of measurement and antibiotic use prevalence. The pooled estimate of the percentage of appropriate antibiotic prescriptions was 28.5% (95% CI: 10.3-58.0; n = 17,245) as assessed by the McGeer criteria. Year of measurement was associated with decreasing appropriateness of antibiotic use over time (OR:0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.91). The most frequently used antibiotic classes were penicillins (n = 44 studies), cephalosporins (n = 36), sulphonamides/trimethoprim (n = 31), and quinolones (n = 28). CONCLUSIONS Coordinated efforts focusing on LTCFs are required to address antibiotic misuse in LTCFs. Our analysis provides overall baseline and regional estimates for future monitoring of antibiotic use in LTCFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Z. Raban
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter J. Gates
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Claudia Gasparini
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Johanna I. Westbrook
- Centre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thompson ND, Stone ND, Brown CJ, Penna AR, Eure TR, Bamberg WM, Barney GR, Barter D, Clogher P, DeSilva MB, Dumyati G, Frank L, Felsen CB, Godine D, Irizarry L, Kainer MA, Li L, Lynfield R, Mahoehney JP, Maloney M, Nadle J, Ocampo VLS, Pierce R, Ray SM, Davis SS, Sievers M, Srinivasan K, Wilson LE, Zhang AY, Magill SS. Antimicrobial Use in a Cohort of US Nursing Homes, 2017. JAMA 2021; 325:1286-1295. [PMID: 33821897 PMCID: PMC8025112 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.2900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Controlling antimicrobial resistance in health care is a public health priority, although data describing antimicrobial use in US nursing homes are limited. OBJECTIVE To measure the prevalence of antimicrobial use and describe antimicrobial classes and common indications among nursing home residents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cross-sectional, 1-day point-prevalence surveys of antimicrobial use performed between April 2017 and October 2017, last survey date October 31, 2017, and including 15 276 residents present on the survey date in 161 randomly selected nursing homes from selected counties of 10 Emerging Infections Program (EIP) states. EIP staff reviewed nursing home records to collect data on characteristics of residents and antimicrobials administered at the time of the survey. Nursing home characteristics were obtained from nursing home staff and the Nursing Home Compare website. EXPOSURES Residence in one of the participating nursing homes at the time of the survey. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Prevalence of antimicrobial use per 100 residents, defined as the number of residents receiving antimicrobial drugs at the time of the survey divided by the total number of surveyed residents. Multivariable logistic regression modeling of antimicrobial use and percentages of drugs within various classifications. RESULTS Among 15 276 nursing home residents included in the study (mean [SD] age, 77.6 [13.7] years; 9475 [62%] women), complete prevalence data were available for 96.8%. The overall antimicrobial use prevalence was 8.2 per 100 residents (95% CI, 7.8-8.8). Antimicrobial use was more prevalent in residents admitted to the nursing home within 30 days before the survey date (18.8 per 100 residents; 95% CI, 17.4-20.3), with central venous catheters (62.8 per 100 residents; 95% CI, 56.9-68.3) or with indwelling urinary catheters (19.1 per 100 residents; 95% CI, 16.4-22.0). Antimicrobials were most often used to treat active infections (77% [95% CI, 74.8%-79.2%]) and primarily for urinary tract infections (28.1% [95% CI, 15.5%-30.7%]). While 18.2% (95% CI, 16.1%-20.1%) were for medical prophylaxis, most often use was for the urinary tract (40.8% [95% CI, 34.8%-47.1%]). Fluoroquinolones were the most common antimicrobial class (12.9% [95% CI, 11.3%-14.8%]), and 33.1% (95% CI, 30.7%-35.6%) of antimicrobials used were broad-spectrum antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cross-sectional survey of a cohort of US nursing homes in 2017, prevalence of antimicrobial use was 8.2 per 100 residents. This study provides information on the patterns of antimicrobial use among these nursing home residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola D. Thompson
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nimalie D. Stone
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Cedric J. Brown
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Austin R. Penna
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Taniece R. Eure
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Wendy M. Bamberg
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver
- Now with Medical Epidemiology Consulting, Denver, Colorado
| | - Grant R. Barney
- New York Emerging Infections Program, Rochester
- Now with New York State Department of Health, Albany
| | - Devra Barter
- Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver
| | - Paula Clogher
- Connecticut Emerging Infections Program, New Haven
- Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Malini B. DeSilva
- Minnesota Department of Health, St Paul
- Now with HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Ghinwa Dumyati
- New York Emerging Infections Program, Rochester
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Linda Frank
- California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland
| | - Christina B. Felsen
- New York Emerging Infections Program, Rochester
- University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | | | | | - Marion A. Kainer
- Tennessee Department of Health, Nashville
- Now with Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Linda Li
- Maryland Emerging Infections Program, Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Susan M. Ray
- Georgia Emerging Infections Program, Atlanta
- Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | | | | | - Lucy E. Wilson
- Maryland Emerging Infections Program, Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore
- Now with Maryland Emerging Infections Program, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore
| | | | - Shelley S. Magill
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J Crnich
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison
- William S. Middleton Memorial VA Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Preeti Malani
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor
- Associate Editor, JAMA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
"There is no one to pick up the pieces": Sustainability of antibiotic stewardship programs in nursing homes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020; 42:440-447. [PMID: 33100251 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2020.1217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe nursing home staff experiences and perceptions of the factors that impact the sustainability of an antibiotic stewardship program (ASP). METHODS Using a qualitative descriptive design, semistructured interviews with staff at 9 not-for-profit nursing homes with an established ASP were conducted and audio recorded. De-identified transcriptions of the interviews were coded using a sustainability framework and were analyzed to identify themes. RESULTS Interviews were conducted with 48 clinical and administrative staff to elicit their perceptions of the ASPs, and 7 themes were identified. ASPs were perceived to be resource intensive and "data driven," requiring access to and interpretation of data that are not readily available at many nursing homes. Though motivated and committed, ASP champions felt that they could not single-handedly sustain the program. Attending to daily clinical needs (ie, "fires") made it hard to progress beyond implementation and to reach step 2 of sustainability. Longstanding treatment habits by external prescribers and regulations were believed to impede ASP efforts. Partnerships with an external consultant with antibiotic stewardship expertise were considered important, as was the need for internal leadership support and collaboration across disciplinary boundaries. Participants felt that consistent and ongoing education on antibiotic stewardship at all staff levels was important. CONCLUSIONS Although many interconnected factors impact the sustainability of an ASP, nursing homes may be able to sustain an ASP by focusing on 3 critical areas: (1) explicit support by nursing home leadership, (2) external partnerships with professionals with antibiotic stewardship expertise and internal interprofessional collaborations, and (3) consistent education and training for all staff.
Collapse
|
11
|
Song S, Wilson BM, Bej T, Gravenstein S, Carter RR, Marek J, Jump RLP. Antibiotic Use Among Residents Receiving Skilled Nursing Care in 29 U.S. Nursing Homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 69:399-406. [PMID: 33037613 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data describing antibiotic use in U.S. nursing homes remain limited. We report antibiotic use among skilled nursing facility residents from 29 U.S. nursing homes and assessed correlations between antibiotics prescribed to residents in skilled care and nursing home characteristics. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Twenty-nine U.S. nursing homes in the same healthcare corporation. PARTICIPANTS Residents receiving skilled care in 2016. MEASUREMENTS We used pharmacy invoice and nursing home census data to calculate the days of antibiotic therapy per 1,000 days of skilled care (1,000 DOSC), the rate of antibiotic starts per 1,000 DOSC, the length of antibiotic therapy, and the average antibiotic spectrum index. We also assessed correlations between antibiotic use and nursing home characteristics. RESULTS Antibiotics accounted for an average of 9.6% (±0.6%) of systemic medications prescribed among residents receiving skilled care. On average, 26.8% (±2.9%) of antibiotics were intravenous. Fluoroquinolones were prescribed at the highest rates (19% across all facilities), followed by beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (11%), first- and second-generation cephalosporins, sulfonamides, and oral tetracyclines (each at 9%). Both the proportion of residents using enrolled in Medicare and number of unique prescribers responsible for systemic prescriptions positively correlated with the rate of antibiotic starts. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that pharmacy invoices represent a useful and preexisting source of data for assessing antibiotic prescriptions among individuals receiving skilled nursing care. The correlation between the number of unique prescribers and antibiotic starts suggests that prescribers are central to efforts to improve antibiotic use in nursing homes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunah Song
- Cleveland Institute for Computational Biology, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Computer and Data Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Brigid M Wilson
- Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) at the VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Taissa Bej
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) at the VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Stefan Gravenstein
- Brown University Alpert Medical School and School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.,Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Rebecca R Carter
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Joseph Marek
- CommuniCare Health Services, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Robin L P Jump
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.,Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) at the VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sloane PD, Zimmerman S, Nace DA. Progress and Challenges in the Management of Nursing Home Infections. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21:1-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
|