A Systematic Review of Nursing Home Palliative Care Interventions: Characteristics and Outcomes

Impact of Quality Improvement Interventions on Hospital Admissions from Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize evidence assessing the effectiveness of quality improvement (QI) interventions in reducing hospital service use from nursing homes (NHs).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled before-after (CBA), uncontrolled before-after (UBA), and interrupted time series studies. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science from 2000 to August 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD42022364195).

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Long-stay NH residents (>30 days).

METHODS

Included QI interventions using a continuous and data-driven approach to assess solutions aimed at reducing hospital service use. Risk of bias was assessed using JBI tools. Delivery arrangements and implementation strategies were categorized through EPOC taxonomy.

RESULTS

Screening of 14,076 records led to the inclusion of 22 studies describing 29 QI interventions from 6 countries across 964 NHs. Ten studies, comprising 4 of 5 RCTs, 3 of 4 CBAs, and 1 of 12 UBAs were deemed to have a low risk of bias. All but 3 QI interventions used multiple component delivery arrangements (median 6; IQR 3-8), focusing on the "coordination of care and management of care processes" alone or combined with "changes in how, when, where, and by whom health care is delivered." The most frequently used implementation strategies were educational meetings (n = 25) and materials (n = 20). The meta-analysis of 11 studies showed a significant reduction in "all-cause hospital admissions" for QI interventions compared with standard care (rate ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.41-0.87; I2 = 99.3%), with heterogeneity due to study design, QI intervention duration, type of delivery arrangements, and number of implementation strategies. No significant effects were found for emergency department (ED) visits or potentially avoidable hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The study provides preliminary evidence supporting the implementation of QI interventions seeking to reduce hospital admissions from NHs. However, these findings require confirmation through future experimental research.

"You close the door, wipe your sadness and put on a smiling face": a qualitative study of the emotional labour of healthcare professionals providing palliative care in nursing homes in France

BACKGROUND

Palliative care provided to frail and dying older persons in nursing homes results in intense emotions for residents and their relatives as well as for healthcare professionals. In France, scant attention has been given to how nursing home professionals manage their emotions when providing palliative care. This study analysed the emotional demands of providing palliative care in the nursing home context, the emotional strategies used by healthcare professionals to navigate such demands, and how these demands affect their emotional wellbeing.

METHODS

This qualitative study used a multiple case study approach. We purposively selected nine nursing homes from three geographical provinces in France with diverse ownership statuses (public, private, associative). Individual interviews and focus group discussions were held with 93 healthcare professionals from various occupational groups employed in the participating nursing homes. Data was collected from April 2021 to September 2022 and was analysed using thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Data revealed that providing palliative care to dying residents within the nursing home context results in intertwined rewarding and exhausting emotional experiences for healthcare professionals. Professionals have to utilize multifaceted emotional strategies to navigate these experiences, including suppressing and modifying emotions and distancing themselves emotionally from residents to protect themselves from emotional suffering. Participants noted a lack of formal space to express emotions. Unrecognized emotional labour undermines the wellbeing of healthcare professionals in nursing homes, whereas acknowledging emotions enhances satisfaction and gives enhanced meaning to their crucial role in resident care.

CONCLUSION

Acknowledging emotional labour as an inevitable component of providing palliative care in nursing homes is critical to supporting healthcare professional wellbeing, resilience, and retention, which may ultimately improve the quality of care for dying residents. Ensuring quality care and supporting the emotional wellbeing of nursing home professionals requires an organisational culture that considers emotional expression a collective strength-building resource rather than an individual responsibility, in hopes of shaping a new culture that fully acknowledges their humanity alongside their professional skills.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04708002; National registration: ID-RCB number: 2020-A01832-37, Registration date: 2020-12-03.

Identification of unmet palliative care needs of nursing home residents: A scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Nursing home residents often have life limiting illnesses in combination with multiple comorbidities, cognitive deficits, and frailty. Due to these complex characteristics, a high proportion of nursing home residents require palliative care. However, many do not receive palliative care relative to this need resulting in unmet care needs. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no literature reviews to synthesise the evidence on how nursing home staff identify unmet palliative care needs and to determine what guidelines, policies, and frameworks on identifying unmet palliative care needs of nursing home residents are available.

AIM

The aim of this scoping review is to map and summarise the evidence on identifying unmet palliative care needs of residents in nursing homes.

METHODS

This scoping review will be guided by the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The search will be conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO, and APA PsycArticles. A search of grey literature will also be conducted in databases such as CareSearch, Trip, GuidelineCentral, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the National Institute for Health and Care and Excellence website. The search strategy will be developed in conjunction with an academic librarian. Piloting of the screening process will be conducted to ensure agreement among the team on the eligibility criteria. Covidence software will be used to facilitate deduplication, screening, and blind reviewing. Four reviewers will conduct title and abstract screening. Six reviewers will conduct full text screening. Any conflicts will be resolved by a reviewer not involved in the conflict. One reviewer will conduct data extraction using pre-established data extraction tables. Results will be synthesised, and a narrative synthesis will be used to illustrate the findings of this review. Data will be presented visually using tables, figures, and word clouds, as appropriate.

A Nurse Practitioner-Driven Palliative and Supportive Care Service in Nursing Homes: Evaluation of a Quality Improvement Project

This article describes a quality improvement project implemented by a national postacute long-term care organization aimed at enhancing the provision of palliative care to nursing home residents. The project focused on improving advance care planning, end-of-life care, symptom management, and care of people living with serious illness. Both generalist and specialist palliative care training were provided to nurse practitioners in addition to implementing a system to identify residents most likely to benefit from a palliative approach to care. To evaluate the nurse practitioner experiences of the program, survey data were collected from nurse practitioners (N = 7) involved in the project at 5 months after implementation. Nurse practitioners reported the program was well received by nursing home staff, families, and residents. Most nurse practitioners felt more confident managing residents' symptoms and complex care needs; however, some reported needing additional resources for palliative care delivery. Most common symptoms that were managed included pain, delirium, and dyspnea; most common diagnoses cared for were dementia and chronic organ failure (eg, cardiac, lung, renal, and neurological diseases). In the next steps, the project will be expanded throughout the organization, and person- and family-centered outcomes will be evaluated.

Emergency physicians' and nurses' perception on the adequacy of emergency calls for nursing home residents: a non-interventional prospective study

Introduction

A considerable percentage of daily emergency calls are for nursing home residents. With the ageing of the overall European population, an increase in emergency calls and interventions in nursing homes (NH) is to be expected. A proportion of these interventions and hospital transfers may be preventable and could be considered as inappropriate by prehospital emergency medical personnel. The study aimed to understand Belgian emergency physicians' and emergency nurses' perspectives on emergency calls and interventions in NHs and investigate factors contributing to their perception of inappropriateness.

Methods

An exploratory non-interventional prospective study was conducted in Belgium among emergency physicians and emergency nurses, currently working in prehospital emergency medicine. Electronic questionnaires were sent out in September, October and November 2023. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the overall results, as well as to compare the answers between emergency physicians and emergency nurses about certain topics.

Results

A total of 114 emergency physicians and 78 nurses responded to the survey. The mean age was 38 years with a mean working experience of 10 years in prehospital healthcare. Nursing home staff were perceived as understaffed and lacking in competence, with an impact on patient care especially during nights and weekends. General practitioners were perceived as insufficiently involved in the patient's care, as well as often unavailable in times of need, leading to activation of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and transfers of nursing home residents to the Emergency Department (ED). Advance directives were almost never available at EMS interventions and transfers were often not in accordance with the patient's wishes. Palliative care and pain treatment were perceived as insufficient. Emergency physicians and nurses felt mostly disappointed and frustrated. Additionally, differences in perception were noted between emergency physicians and nurses regarding certain topics. Emergency nurses were more convinced that the nursing home physician should be available 24/7 and that transfers could be avoided if nursing home staff had more authority regarding medical interventions. Emergency nurses were also more under the impression that pain management was inadequate, and emergency physicians were more afraid of the medical implications of doing too little during interventions than emergency nurses. Suggestions to reduce the number of EMS interventions were more general practitioner involvement (82%), better nursing home staff education/competences (77%), more nursing home staff (67%), mobile palliative care support teams (65%) and mobile geriatric nursing intervention teams (52%).

Discussion and conclusion

EMS interventions in nursing homes were almost never seen as necessary or indicated by emergency physicians and nurses, with the appropriate EMS level almost never being activated. The following key issues were found: shortages in numbers and competence of nursing home staff, insufficient primary care due to the unavailability of the general practitioner as well as a lack of involvement in patient care, and an absence of readily available advance directives. General practitioners should be more involved in the decision to call the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and to transfer nursing home residents to the Emergency Department. Healthcare workers should strive for vigilance regarding the patients' wishes. The emotional burden of deciding on an avoidable hospital admission of nursing home residents, perhaps out of fear for medico-legal consequences if doing too little, leaves the emergency physicians and nurses frustrated and disappointed. Improvements in nursing home staffing, more acute and chronic general practitioner consultations, and mobile geriatric and palliative care support teams are potential solutions. Further research should focus on the structural improvement of the above-mentioned shortcomings.

Understanding the Utility of Less Than Six-Month Prognosis Using Administrative Data Among U.S. Nursing Home Residents With Cancer

Background

There is a dearth of studies evaluating the utility of reporting prognostication among nursing home (NH) residents with cancer.

Objective

To study factors associated with documented less than six-month prognosis, and its relationship with end-of-life (EOL) care quality measures among residents with cancer.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results linked with Medicare, and the Minimum Data Set databases was used to identify 20,397 NH residents in the United States with breast, colorectal, lung, pancreatic, or prostate cancer who died between July 2016 and December 2018. Of these, 2205 residents (10.8%) were documented with less than six-month prognosis upon NH admission. Main outcomes were more than one hospitalization, more than one emergency department visit, and any intensive care unit admission within the last 30 days of life as aggressive EOL care markers, as well as admission to hospice, receipt of advance care planning and palliative care, and survival. Specificity and sensitivity of prognosis were assessed using six-month mortality as the outcome. Propensity score matching adjusted for selection biases, and logistic regression examined association.

Results

Specificity and sensitivity of documented less than six-month prognosis for mortality were 94.2% and 13.7%, respectively. Residents with documented less than six-month prognosis had greater odds of being admitted to hospice than those without (adjusted odds ratio: 3.27, 95% confidence interval: 2.86-3.62), and lower odds to receive aggressive EOL care.

Conclusion

In this cohort study, documented less than six-month prognosis was associated with less aggressive EOL care. Despite its high specificity, however, low sensitivity limits its utility to operationalize care on a larger population of residents with terminal illness.

Improving End-of-Life Care for Nursing Home Residents Using an Interprofessional Approach

Interprofessional collaboration enhances quality end-of-life care leading to a dignified death. Hospice care uses an interdisciplinary approach to optimize quality of life and mitigate impacts of serious illness. Interventions to improve hospice care delivery have been proven to be effective, but little is known about nursing home staff preparedness, implementation of hospice education, and interprofessional communication. Research is limited on how hospice care can be implemented into the nursing home setting. The purpose of this study was to determine if education combined with a communication tool improved nursing home staff knowledge and improved communication with the hospice team. The descriptive study invited participants to take a preseminar and postseminar survey to assess end-of-life preparedness in terms of willingness, capability, and resilience. A communication tool was implemented to measure collaboration with the hospice team over 3 months. The results from this study suggest education combined with interprofessional communication improves end-of-life care.

Nurse-led supportive Coordinated Transitional Care (CTraC) program improves care for veterans with serious illness

BACKGROUND

The Coordinated Transitional Care (CTraC) program is a telephone-based, nurse-driven program shown to decrease readmissions. The aim of this project was to implement and evaluate an adapted version of CTraC, Supportive CTraC, to improve the quality of transitional and end-of-life care for veterans with serious illness.

METHODS

We used the Replicating Effective Programs framework to guide adaptation and implementation. An RN nurse case manager (NCM) with experience in geriatrics and palliative care worked closely with inpatient and outpatient care teams to coordinate care. Eligible patients had a life-limiting diagnosis with substantial functional impairment and were not enrolled in hospice. The NCM identified veterans at VA Boston Healthcare System during an acute admission and delivered a protocolized intervention to define care needs and preferences, align care with patient values, optimize discharge plans, and provide ongoing, intensive phone-based case management. To evaluate efficacy, we matched each Supportive CTraC enrollee 1:1 to a contemporary comparison subject by age, risk of death or hospitalization, and discharge diagnosis. We used Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox-Proportional Hazards models to evaluate outcomes. Outcomes included palliative and hospice care use, acute care use, Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment documentation, and survival.

RESULTS

The NCM enrolled 104 veterans with high protocol fidelity. Over 1.5 years of follow-up, Supportive CTraC enrollees were 61% more likely to enroll in hospice than the comparison group (n = 57 vs. 39; HR = 1.61; 95% CI = 1.07-2.43). While overall acute care use was similar between groups, Supportive CTraC patients had fewer ICU admissions (n = 36 vs. 53; p = 0.005), were more likely to die in hospice (53 vs. 34; p = 0.008), and twice as likely to die at home with hospice (32.0 vs. 15.5; p = 0.02). There was no difference in survival between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A nurse-driven transitional care program for veterans with serious illness is feasible and effective at improving end-of-life outcomes.

Telehealth Palliative Care in Nursing Homes: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

Many adults older than 65 spend time in a nursing home (NH) at the end of life where specialist palliative care is limited. However, telehealth may improve access to palliative care services. A review of the literature was conducted to synthesize the evidence for telehealth palliative care in NHs to provide recommendations for practice, research, and policy.

DESIGN

Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews frameworks were used to guide this literature review.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

Reviewed articles focused on residents in NHs with telehealth palliative care interventionists operating remotely. Participants included NH residents, care partner(s), and NH staff/clinicians.

METHODS

We searched Medline (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library (WileyOnline), Scopus (Elsevier), CINHAL (EBSCOhost), Trip PRO, and Dissertations & Theses Global (ProQuest) in June 2021, with an update in January 2022. We included observational and qualitative studies, clinical trials, quality improvement projects, and case and clinical reports that self-identified as telehealth palliative care for NH residents.

RESULTS

The review yielded 11 eligible articles published in the United States and internationally from 2008 to 2020. Articles described live video as the preferred telehealth delivery modality with goals of care and physical aspects of care being most commonly addressed. Findings in the articles focused on 5 patient and family-centered outcomes: symptom management, quality of life, advance care planning, health care use, and evaluation of care. Consistent benefits of telehealth palliative care included increased documentation of goals of care and decrease in acute care use. Disadvantages included technological difficulties and increased NH financial burden.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Although limited in scope and quality, the current evidence for telehealth palliative care interventions shows promise for improving quality and outcomes of serious illness care in NHs. Future empirical studies should focus on intervention effectiveness, implementation outcomes (eg, managing technology), stakeholders' experience, and costs.

Which interventions are effective at decreasing or increasing emergency department attendances or hospital admissions from long-term care facilities? A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

UK long-term care facility residents account for 185 000 emergency hospital admissions each year. Avoidance of unnecessary hospital transfers benefits residents, reduces demand on the healthcare systems but is difficult to implement. We synthesised evidence on interventions that influence unplanned hospital admissions or attendances by long-term care facility residents.

METHODS

This is a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched from 2012 to 2022, building on a review published in 2013. We included randomised controlled trials that evaluated interventions that influence (decrease or increase) acute hospital admissions or attendances of long-term care facility residents. Risk of bias and evidence quality were assessed using Cochrane Risk Of Bias-2 and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

RESULTS

Forty-three randomised studies were included in this review. A narrative synthesis was conducted and the weight of evidence described with vote counting. Advance care planning and goals of care setting appear to be effective at reducing hospitalisations from long-term care facilities. Other effective interventions, in order of increasing risk of bias, were: nurse practitioner/specialist input, palliative care intervention, influenza vaccination and enhancing access to intravenous therapies in long-term care facilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Factors that affect hospitalisation and emergency department attendances of long-term care facility residents are complex. This review supports the already established use of advance care planning and influenza vaccination to reduce unscheduled hospital attendances. It is likely that more than one intervention will be needed to impact on healthcare usage across the long-term care facility population. The findings of this review are useful to identify effective interventions that can be combined, as well as highlighting interventions that either need evaluation or are not effective at decreasing healthcare usage.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020169604.

Effects of Palliative Care for Progressive Neurologic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To determine the association of palliative care for progressive neurologic diseases with patient- and caregiver-centered outcomes.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies, including pilot studies.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Adults with progressive neurologic diseases (dementia, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, motor neuron disease, multiple system atrophy, and progressive supranuclear palsy) and their caregivers.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL PLUS, Cochrane CENTRAL, and PubMed were searched from inception to September 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tools. Narrative synthesis was conducted. Patient quality of life (QoL), symptom burden, caregiver burden, and satisfaction with care were meta-analyzed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Fifteen trials provided data on 3431 patients (mean age, 73.9 years). Compared with usual care, palliative care was statistically significantly associated with lower symptom burden [standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.34 (95% Cl, -0.59 to -0.09)] and higher caregiver satisfaction [SMD, 0.41 (95% Cl, 0.12 to 0.71)] and patient satisfaction [SMD, 0.43 (95% Cl, -0.01 to 0.87)]. However, the associations were not significant after excluding studies with high risk of bias. Insignificant associations of palliative care with caregiver burden [SMD, -0.09 (95% Cl, -0.21 to 0.03)] and patient QoL [SMD, 0.19 (95% Cl, -0.07 to 0.44)] were observed.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Palliative care is likely to improve symptom burden and satisfaction with care among patients with progressive neurologic diseases and their caregivers, while its effects on QoL and caregiver burden remains inconclusive. Specific intervention components including interdisciplinary team, palliative care physicians, home visits, and spiritual care appeared to be associated with increased effects on improving palliative outcomes. More rigorous designed studies are warranted to examine the effects of neuropalliative care, effective intervention components, optimal timing, and symptom triggers of palliative care referrals.

Pilot Trial of a Social Work Intervention to Provide Palliative Care for Adults with Cancer in Skilled Nursing Facilities

Background: Hospitalized patients with cancer and their caregivers discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) have unmet palliative care needs. Objective: To determine feasibility and acceptability of Assessing and Listening to Individual Goals and Needs (ALIGN), a palliative care social worker (PCSW) intervention, for older adults and their caregivers in SNFs. Design: Single-arm, single-site pilot study. Predefined feasibility goals were >70% intervention completion and study retention rates (postintervention outcomes completed at one week). Setting/Subjects: Twenty-three patients with cancer and their 21 caregivers discharged to 12 SNFs posthospitalization. Measurements: Primary outcomes were feasibility and acceptability. Exploratory patient and caregiver-reported outcomes, including goals of care were collected at baseline and one week postintervention. Health care utilization, mortality, and hospice utilization was collected at the six-month follow-up. Results: Of 73 patients screened, 35 (48%) were eligible and 23 (66%) patients and 21 caregivers enrolled. Eighteen (78%) patients completed the intervention and 10 (44%) patients and 13 (62%) caregivers provided follow-up outcomes. Average age of patients was 73, and 19 (83%) had stage III or IV cancer. Average age of caregivers was 55. Eight (44%) patients' preferences changed to prefer less aggressive care. Nineteen (83%) patients died during or shortly after intervention completion. Qualitative feedback from participant and SNF staff interviews supported high acceptability. PCSW involvement increased illness understanding and patient engagement with advance care planning. SNF staff valued increased palliative support. Conclusions: Intervention completion was >70%, however, not study retention due to higher-than-expected mortality. Future study should account for high mortality and examine whether ALIGN can better prepare surrogate decision makers and enhance the ability of SNFs to address changing goals of care. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT04882111.

Prevalence and Predictors of Symptoms in Persons with Advanced Dementia Living in the Community

Background: Behavioral, psychological, and physical symptoms are prevalent in advanced dementia, as well as major contributors to poor quality of life, health care costs, caregiver burden, and nursing home placement. Objectives: To determine the frequency and severity of symptoms in persons with advanced dementia living in the community, as well as the association between symptoms and satisfaction with care, and the identification of factors associated with symptom burden. Design: Baseline data from a clinical trial testing the effectiveness of collaborative care home-based management for patients with advanced dementia. Setting/Subjects: Two hundred and one patient-caregiver dyads from an urban area in the United States, who were still residing in the community. Measurements: Caregivers completed the Symptom Management in End-of-Life Dementia (SM-EOLD) and Satisfaction with Care in End-of-Life Dementia (SWC-EOLD) scales. Results: Patients' mean age was 83.1; 67.7% were women, and most were either White (50.2%) or African American (43.8%). Most (88.1%) had severe dementia (Functional Assessment Staging Tool [FAST] stage 6 or 7). SM-EOLD mean score was 29.3 (on 0-45 scale) and SWC-EOLD score was 32.6 (on 10-40 scale). Pain, agitation, anxiety, and resistiveness to care were present at least weekly in ≥40% of patients. Multivariable linear regression modeling showed that higher neuropsychiatric symptom severity (assessed by the Neuropsychiatric Inventory), increased caregiver strain, and higher medical comorbidity were all independently associated with increased symptom burden. Satisfaction with care was high and had only a modest correlation (r = 0.20) with symptom burden. Conclusions: Community-dwelling patients with advanced dementia and their caregivers may benefit from home-based palliative care interventions to identify and manage burdensome symptoms.

End-of-life care for older people: the way forward

Even though many older people will live longer in good health, many will also be confronted with frailty, multi-morbidity, cognitive decline, disability and serious illnesses in the last years of their life. The end-of-life trajectories of frail older people have a major impact on the care that needs to be provided. Older people develop different physical, psychological, and/or social needs in varying intensity during the last years of life. Moreover, determining a clear terminal phase of life is difficult in this population. In this commentary, we aim to highlight the importance of an integrated palliative, geriatric and rehabilitative care approach for older people, emphasizing the importance of setting-specific and cross-setting interventions. We stress the importance of person-centred care planning with the older patient and the role of their families, communities and society as a whole. We identify and formulate some of the research gaps that can be addressed in the near future.

Nursing Home Palliative Care during the Pandemic: Directions for the Future

Background and Objectives

Palliative care addresses physical, emotional, psychological, and spiritual suffering that accompanies serious illness. Emphasis on symptom management and goals of care is especially valuable for seriously ill nursing home residents. We investigated barriers to nursing home palliative care provision highlighted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the solutions nursing home staff used to provide care in the face of those barriers.

Research Design and Methods

For this descriptive qualitative study, seven Massachusetts nursing home directors of nursing were interviewed remotely about palliative care provision before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

Before the pandemic, palliative care was delivered primarily by nursing home staff depending on formal and informal consultations from palliative care specialists affiliated with hospice providers. When COVID-19 lockdowns precluded these consultations, nursing staff did their best to provide palliative care, but were often overwhelmed by shortfalls in resources, resident decline brought on by isolation and COVID-19 itself, and a sense that their expertise was lacking. Advance care planning conversations focused on hospitalization decisions and options for care given resource constraints. Nevertheless, nursing staff discovered previously untapped capacity to provide palliative care on-site as part of standard care, building trust of residents and families.

Discussion and Implications

Nursing staff rose to the palliative care challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic, albeit with great effort. Consistent with prepandemic analysis, we conclude that nursing home payment and quality standards should support development of in-house staff capacity to deliver palliative care while expanding access to the formal consultations and family involvement that were restricted by the pandemic. Future research should be directed to evaluating initiatives that pursue these aims.

High-Quality Nursing Home and Palliative Care-One and the Same

Many individuals receiving post-acute and long-term care services in nursing homes have unmet palliative and end-of-life care needs. Hospice has been the predominant approach to meeting these needs, although hospice services generally are available only to long-term care residents with a limited prognosis who choose to forego disease-modifying or curative therapies. Two additional approaches to meeting these needs are the provision of palliative care consultation through community- or hospital-based programs and facility-based palliative care services. However, access to this specialized care is limited, services are not clearly defined, and the empirical evidence of these approaches' effectiveness is inadequate. In this article, we review the existing evidence and challenges with each of these 3 approaches. We then describe a model for effective delivery of palliative and end-of-life care in nursing homes, one in which palliative and end-of-life care are seen as integral to high-quality nursing home care. To achieve this vision, we make 4 recommendations: (1) promote internal palliative and end-of-life care capacity through comprehensive training and support; (2) ensure that state and federal payment policies and regulations do not create barriers to delivering high-quality, person-centered palliative and end-of-life care; (3) align nursing home quality measures to include palliative and end-of-life care-sensitive indicators; and (4) support access to and integration of external palliative care services. These recommendations will require changes in the organization, delivery, and reimbursement of care. All nursing homes should provide high-quality palliative and end-of-life care, and this article describes some key strategies to make this goal a reality.

Implementing Primary Palliative Care in Post-acute nursing home care: Protocol for an embedded pilot pragmatic trial

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with serious illness frequently receive post-acute rehabilitative care in nursing homes (NH) under the Part A Medicare Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Benefit. Treatment is commonly focused on disease-modifying therapies with minimal consideration for goals of care, symptom relief, and other elements of palliative care.

INTERVENTION

The evidence-based Primary Palliative Care in Post-Acute Care (PPC-PAC) intervention for older adults is delivered by nurse practitioners (NP). PPC-PAC NPs assess and manage symptoms, conduct goals of care discussions and assist with decision making; they communicate findings with NH staff and providers. Implementation of PPC-PAC includes online and face-to-face training of NPs, ongoing facilitation, and a template embedded in the NH electronic health record to document PPC-PAC.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this pilot pragmatic clinical trial are to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the PPC-PAC intervention and its implementation for 80 seriously ill older adults newly admitted to a NH for post-acute care.

METHODS

Design is a two-arm nonequivalent group multi-site pilot pragmatic clinical trial. The unit of assignment is at the NP and unit of analysis is NH patients. Recruitment occurs at NHs in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland. Effectiveness (patient quality of life) data are collected at two times points-baseline and 14-21 days.

CONCLUSION

This will be the first study to evaluate the implementation of an evidence-based primary palliative care intervention specifically designed for older adults with serious illness who are receiving post-acute NH care.

NUrsing Homes End of Life care Program (NUHELP): developing a complex intervention

BACKGROUND

Nursing homes are likely to become increasingly important as end-of-life care facilities. Previous studies indicate that individuals residing in these facilities have a high prevalence of end-of-life symptoms and a significant need for palliative care. The aim of this study was to develop an end-of-life care program for nursing homes in Spain based on previous models yet adapted to the specific context and the needs of staff in nursing homes in the country.

METHODS

A descriptive study of a complex intervention procedure was developed. The study consisted of three phases. The first phase was a prospective study assessing self-efficacy in palliative care (using the SEPC scale) and attitudes towards end-of-life care (using the FATCOD-B scale) among nursing home staff before and after the completion of a basic palliative care training program. In the second phase, objectives were selected using the Delphi consensus technique, where nursing home and primary care professionals assessed the relevance, feasibility, and level of attainment of 42 quality standards. In phase 3, interventions were selected for these objectives through two focus group sessions involving nursing home, primary care, and palliative care professionals.

RESULTS

As a result of the training, an improvement in self-efficacy and attitudes towards end-of-life care was observed. In phase 2, 14 standards were selected and grouped into 5 objectives: to conduct a comprehensive assessment and develop a personalized care plan adapted to the palliative needs detected; to provide information in a clear and accessible way; to request and record advance care directives; to provide early care with respect to loss and grief; to refer patients to a specialized palliative care unit if appropriate, depending on the complexity of the palliative care required. Based on these objectives, the participants in the focus group sessions designed the 22 interventions that make up the program.

CONCLUSIONS

The objectives and interventions of the NUHELP program constitute an end-of-life care program which can be implemented in nursing homes to improve the quality of end-of-life care in these facilities by modifying their clinical practice, organization, and relationship with the health system as well as serving as an example of an effective health intervention program.

Anxiety Due to COVID-19 in Different Palliative Care Settings in Germany

Epidemics exert significant psychological impact. We conducted a survey in different palliative care settings focusing on anxiety caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A questionnaire was given from April 1 through May 8, 2020, to 154 patients in 3 distinct populations: (1) hospice patients, (2) patients under ambulatory palliative care, (3) as controls, patients visiting a general practitioner (GP) practice. Items captured were age, anxiety caused by COVID-19 on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, influence on everyday life, insomnia, and appetite loss. Palliative care patients were older than GP visitors (median [interquartile range], 72 [61-78] years in the hospice, 76 [67-83] years in ambulatory palliative care, and 62 [56-74] years in GP practice, P < .001). Anxiety scores were 0 (0-2) in the hospice, 3 (0-6) in ambulatory palliative care and 4.5 (2-6) in the GP practice (P = .004 for hospice vs GP practice, P = .177 for ambulatory palliative care vs GP practice). Age did not correlate with anxiety (P = .063). Anxiety-caused insomnia ranged from 0% to 12%. Patients' everyday life was influenced in 15% to 31% in the 3 groups (P = .480). Patients in ambulatory palliative care experienced comparable anxiety caused by COVID-19 with other patients, whereas anxiety was negligible in hospice patients. Addressing the psychological impact of the pandemic should be considered in management of palliative patients.

Developing and implementing a novel program to prepare nursing home-based geriatric nurse practitioners in primary palliative care

ABSTRACT

Current palliative care workforce projections indicate that the growing palliative care needs of older adults in US nursing homes cannot be met by specialists, leaving them vulnerable and at risk for poor end-of-life outcomes. The purpose of this article is to describe the development, implementation, and initial evaluation of a program to support primary care nursing home nurse practitioners (NPs) in palliative care. The program aimed to improve geriatric NPs' knowledge and skills related to palliative care and to provide a structured protocol for integrating palliative care encounters into NPs' practice. It comprised three phases consisting of asynchronous online learning modules, a 1-day face-to-face communication skills and patient simulation workshop, and ongoing monthly virtual meetings to support NP clinical practice. Over a 1-year period, the program was developed and implemented with 12 practicing NPs in a national organization. Through an online survey and face-to-face feedback, NPs reported satisfaction with the curriculum and expressed it as valuable to their clinical practice. Future work will focus on sustaining implementation of the program, measuring patient level outcomes, and refining the curriculum based on NP feedback.