Closing the Gap in Nutrition Care at Outpatient Cancer Centers: Ongoing Initiatives of the Oncology Nutrition Dietetic Practice Group

Core elements and principles of nutrition models of care for people with cancer: A scoping review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The development and implementation of evidence-based cancer nutrition models of care into clinical practice is challenging and pragmatic guidance is lacking. This scoping review aimed to identify the core elements and principles of nutrition models of care for people with cancer.

METHODS

MEDLINE Complete, CINAHL and Embase were systematically searched between 1 January 2003-8 November 2023. Studies were eligible for inclusion and data extraction if they reported on the implementation or evaluation of a nutrition model of care for adults with any cancer diagnosis. The protocol was prospectively registered on Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RQVHJ) on 7 November 2023.

RESULTS

The search identified 4599 papers, 28 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were primarily conducted in Australia (71.4 %), within a hospital (96.4 %), metropolitan setting (89.3 %) and with various cancer diagnoses. Most studies described a nutrition screening process and 50 % used a valid and reliable assessment tool. Studies described provision of direct care by the dietitian (n = 26), primarily conducted in the outpatient setting (n = 26) and lesser in the inpatient setting (n = 12), and frequently face-to-face (n = 25) [phone (n = 14), telehealth (n = 3)]. Ten core elements were identified that underpinned the models of care including: timely care driven by a care pathway, protocol or clinic (100.0 %); nutrition expertise and leadership (100.0 %); flexible and integrated (100.0 %); with multi-directional communication (96.4 %); accessible (92.9 %); stratified by risk (89.3 %); multidisciplinary engagement (85.7 %); across different care time-points and settings (85.7 %); supported by training/education (50.0 %) and data integration (25.0 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Nutrition expert-led cancer nutrition models of care literature was primarily limited to metropolitan, hospital settings and many lacked valid nutrition assessment tools. Ten core elements were identified that underpinned nutrition care, with the most utilised being: timely care driven by a care pathway, protocol or clinic; nutrition expert-led; flexible and integrated; with multi-directional communication; accessible; and stratified by risk. There is great potential for an evidence-based model of nutrition care to improve the implementation and embedding of high-quality nutrition elements into the cancer pathway.

A formal section of oncology nutrition: program development in a major cancer center (2012-2022)

Cancer and cancer therapies dramatically impact nutritional status, leading to malnutrition and weight loss. Cancer centers struggle with inadequate staffing of oncology certified Registered Dietitian Nutritionists (RDN) to provide appropriate nutritional care. Evidence suggests RDN interventions can increase lean body mass, enhance weight maintenance, promote quality of life, and improve cancer treatment adherence. There is, however, limited literature about practical approaches to RDN staffing models for ambulatory cancer centers. The Atrium Health Levine Cancer Section of Oncology Nutrition was formalized in 2016 and now consists of 15 RDNs across 23 practice locations. In 2022, 14 clinical RDNs and one Wellness RDN completed over 16,000 encounters across 9,700 new and established patients. The RDNs are involved with nutrition and wellness education, quality improvement projects, subspeciality integration, and telenutrition. We describe the history and organization of a successful clinical and academic Section of Oncology Nutrition within a major multisite cancer center. We also review challenges and lessons learned regarding this important and novel development.

The Effect of Nutritional Mobile Apps on Populations With Cancer: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Limited access to nutrition support among populations with cancer is a major barrier to sustainable and quality cancer care. Increasing use of mobile health in health care has raised concerns about its validity and health impacts.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aimed to determine the effectiveness of commercial or cancer-specific nutritional mobile apps among people living with cancer.

METHODS

A systematic search of the CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed (MEDLINE), and Scopus databases was carried out in May 2024. All types of intervention studies were included, except observational studies, gray literature, and reference lists of key systematic reviews. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they involved (1) patients with or survivors of cancer and (2) nutrition-related mobile apps. Studies were excluded if the nutrition intervention was not delivered via mobile app or the app intervention was accompanied by dietary counseling. The review process was conducted based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The Risk of Bias 2 and Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies tools were used to assess the study quality. The Cochrane Review Manager (version 5.4) software was used to synthesize the results of the bias assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 13 interventions were included, comprising 783 adults or teenagers with cancer. Most studies focused on breast cancer (6/13, 46%), overweight (6/13, 46%), and survivors (9/13, 69%). Data on anthropometry and body composition (7/13, 54%; 387 participants), nutritional status (3/13, 23%; 249 participants), dietary intake (7/13, 54%; 352 participants), and quality of life (6/13, 46%; 384 participants) were gathered. Experimental groups were more likely to report significant improvements in body weight or composition, dietary compliance, nutritional status, and quality of life than control groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although mobile app platforms are used to deliver nutrition interventions, the evidence for long-term efficacy, particularly in populations with cancer, remains elusive. More robust randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes, as well as more homogeneous population characteristics and outcome measures, are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023330575; https://tinyurl.com/55v56yaj.

Nutritional Counseling During Chemotherapy Treatment: A Systematic Review of Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy

Dietary interventions during chemotherapy hold promise for clinical and supportive care outcomes. We systematically investigated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of nutritional counseling conducted during chemotherapy. Studies prospectively implemented nutrition counseling during chemotherapy. Articles were identified from three databases-EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and SCOPUS-from inception to 1 October 2024. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of outcome data were extracted. Among 44 publications, 39 studies recruited 98 ± 80 participants (range 15-360); 38/39 (97%) were randomized controlled trials. One-third (31%) were among patients with breast cancer. Interventions were divided into individualized nutritional counseling (n = 21), nutrition counseling plus exercise (n = 13), and nutrient-specific dietary patterns (n = 10). Many had goals to achieve established nutrition guidelines. Feasibility was high based on attendance at counseling sessions, retention, and/or food log analysis. Overall, there were minimal adverse events related to the interventions. Many studies showed between-group differences favoring the intervention group for body weight (8/24, gain or loss, according to goals), nutritional status (8/9), quality of life (3/10 without and 6/9 with exercise), cancer-related fatigue (7/10), chemotherapy tolerance (6/11), and treatment responses (3/13). In conclusion, nutritional interventions were feasible and safe for patients undergoing chemotherapy and demonstrated preliminary efficacy to improve nutritional status, fatigue, chemotherapy tolerance, and other outcomes.

Screening, identification, and diagnosis of malnutrition in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is common in hospitalized patients with cancer and adversely affects clinical outcomes. We evaluated the prevalence of malnutrition risk, dietitian-identified malnutrition (DIMN), and physician-diagnosed malnutrition (PDMN) at admission.

METHODS

This retrospective study included adults diagnosed with a stage I-IV solid tumor malignancy and admitted to Atrium Health Carolinas Medical Center from January 2016 to May 2019. Malnutrition risk was determined by a score ≥2 on the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) administered by a registered nurse during the intake process. Registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) assessments were reviewed for DIMN and grade (mild, moderate, or severe). PDMN included malnutrition International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes in the discharge summary. Univariate models were estimated; multivariate logistic regression models identified associations between clinicodemographic factors and malnutrition prevalence with stepwise selection.

RESULTS

A total of 5143 patients were included. Median age was 63 (range 18-102) years, 48% were female, 70% were White, and 24% were Black. Upper gastrointestinal (21%), thoracic (18%), and genitourinary (18%) cancers were most common. A total of 28% had stage IV disease. MST scores were available for 4085 (79%); 1005 of 4085 (25%) were at malnutrition risk. Eleven percent (n = 557) had malnutrition coded by a physician or documented by an RDN; 4% (n = 223) of these were identified by both clinicians, 4% (n = 197) by RDNs only, and 3% (n = 137) by physicians only.

CONCLUSION

Malnutrition appears to be underdiagnosed by both RDNs and physicians. Underdiagnosis of malnutrition may have significant clinical, operational, and financial implications in cancer care.

Malnutrition risk screening in adult oncology outpatients: An ASPEN systematic review and clinical recommendations

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition screening is not widely practiced in outpatient cancer centers. This review aims to determine the validity of malnutrition screening tools and provide recommendations for clinical use.

METHODS

Studies identified by a systematic review assessed the general validity of screening tools in adult oncology outpatients from five databases through 2022. The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) convened a working group of members from the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Academy of Oncology Nurse and Patient Navigators, American Cancer Society, American Society for Clinical Oncology, American Society for Nutrition, American Society for Radiation Oncology, Association of Cancer Care Centers, and Oncology Nursing Society to answer the following questions: (1) should clinicians screen for malnutrition, (2) which malnutrition screening tools are recommended, and (3) what are the clinical applications for malnutrition risk screening in adult oncology outpatients?

RESULTS

Twenty of 738 studies met the criteria and were reviewed. Six screening tools with specific cut-points demonstrated validity and are recommended, including the Mini Nutritional Assessment (≤23.5), Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST; MST ≥ 2 and patient-led MST ≥ 2), Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST; MUST ≥ 1 and MUST ≥ 2), Nutrition Risk Screening-2002 (NRS-2002; NRS-2002 ≥ 2 and NRS-2002 ≥ 3), NUTRISCORE ≥ 5, and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF; PG-SGA SF ≥ 7 and PG-SGA SF ≥ 8).

CONCLUSION

Six screening tools are valid for malnutrition risk identification in oncology ambulatory settings and recommended before treatment initiation and regularly thereafter, depending on treatment course. Research is needed to understand to what extent early diagnosis and management of malnutrition improves the clinical care of oncology patients.

Dietary Counseling Interventions During Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review of Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy

Radiotherapy is a common cancer treatment, and concurrent nutritional interventions can maintain nutritional status and improve clinical and supportive care outcomes. However, optimal nutritional interventions during radiotherapy are not firmly established. Herein, we assessed the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of dietary counseling interventions without oral nutrition supplements on health outcomes in adults receiving radiotherapy for cancer in a systematic review. Prospective clinical trials that implemented nutritional counseling interventions during radiotherapy were identified from four databases from inception through December 2023. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy were extracted from 32 articles that described 23 randomized and 4 non-randomized clinical trials. The interventions included individualized nutritional counseling (n = 14 articles), nutritional counseling plus exercise (n = 4), and nutritional counseling focused on increasing or reducing intake of specific nutrients (n = 9). Trials targeted head and neck (n = 12), pelvic cancers (n = 14), and/or breast (n = 5) cancers. Control groups had variable designs and included general nutrition education and intervention as needed. Studies recruited 120 ± 104 participants (range 26-468). Interventions tended to be feasible regarding retention and attendance at sessions, though feasibility metrics varied among different interventions. Most interventions were safe with no studies reporting adverse events attributable to dietary intervention. Individualized dietary counseling interventions tended to lead to between-group differences favoring the intervention group in regard to improved nutritional status, maintenance or attenuation of loss of body mass, improved quality of life, and reduced radiation-induced toxicities. Diets that encouraged/discouraged specific nutrients tended to recruit patients receiving radiation to the pelvic area and resulted in positive or neutral effects on gastrointestinal symptoms. In conclusion, nutritional interventions appear to be feasible, safe, and effective during radiotherapy for various symptom outcomes.

Advancements in the impact of human microbiota and probiotics on leukemia

The human gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem that plays a crucial role in promoting the interaction between the body and its environment. It has been increasingly recognized that the gut microbiota has diverse physiological functions. Recent studies have shown a close association between the gut microbiota and the development of certain tumors, including leukemia. Leukemia is a malignant clonal disease characterized by the uncontrolled growth of one or more types of blood cells, which is the most common cancer in children. The imbalance of gut microbiota is linked to the pathological mechanisms of leukemia. Probiotics, which are beneficial microorganisms that help maintain the balance of the host microbiome, play a role in regulating gut microbiota. Probiotics have the potential to assist in the treatment of leukemia and improve the clinical prognosis of leukemia patients. This study reviews the relationship between gut microbiota, probiotics, and the progression of leukemia based on current research. In addition, utilizing zebrafish leukemia models in future studies might reveal the specific mechanisms of their interactions, thereby providing new insights into the clinical treatment of leukemia. In conclusion, further investigation is still needed to fully understand the accurate role of microbes in leukemia.

National Implementation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Virtual Dietitian for Patients With Cancer

PURPOSE

Nutritional status is an established driver of cancer outcomes, but there is an insufficient workforce of registered dietitians to meet patient needs for nutritional counseling. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) afford the opportunity to expand access to guideline-based nutritional support.

METHODS

An AI-based nutrition assistant called Ina was developed on the basis of a learning data set of >100,000 expert-curated interventions, peer-reviewed literature, and clinical guidelines, and provides a conversational text message-based patient interface to guide dietary habits and answer questions. Ina was implemented nationally in partnership with 25 advocacy organizations. Data on demographics, patient-reported outcomes, and utilization were systematically collected.

RESULTS

Between July 2019 and August 2023, 3,310 users from all 50 states registered to use Ina. Users were 73% female; median age was 57 (range, 18-91) years; most common cancer types were genitourinary (22%), breast (21%), gynecologic (19%), GI (14%), and lung (12%). Users were medically complex, with 50% reporting Stage III to IV disease, 37% with metastases, and 50% with 2+ chronic conditions. Nutritional challenges were highly prevalent: 58% had overweight/obese BMIs, 83% reported barriers to good nutrition, and 42% had food allergies/intolerances. Levels of engagement were high: 68% texted questions to Ina; 79% completed surveys; median user retention was 8.8 months; 94% were satisfied with the platform; and 98% found the guidance helpful. In an evaluation of outcomes, 84% used the advice to guide diet; 47% used recommended recipes, 82% felt the program improved quality of life (QoL), and 88% reported improved symptom management.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of an evidence-based AI virtual dietitian is feasible and is reported by patients to be beneficial on diet, QoL, and symptom management. Ongoing evaluations are assessing impact on other outcomes.

Enhancing the provision of cancer nutrition information to support care through experience-based co-design: a mixed-methods study

PURPOSE

Nutrition is essential within cancer care, yet patient and carer access to nutrition care and information is variable. This study aimed to (1) investigate patient and carer access and perceptions, and health professional views and practices, relating to cancer nutrition information and care; and (2) co-design interactive resources to support optimal nutrition care.

METHODS

Patients and carers completed a survey regarding access to nutrition care and information. Seven multidisciplinary health service teams were invited to participate in a survey and focus group to assess barriers and enablers in nutrition practices. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed and thematically analyzed. Eligible patients, carers, and health professionals were invited to four virtual workshops utilizing experience-based co-design methods to identify nutrition priority areas and design resources. Workshop participant acceptability of the resources was measured.

RESULTS

Of 104 consumer survey respondents (n = 97 patients, n = 7 carers), 61% agreed that it "took too much time to find evidence-based nutrition and cancer information", and 46% had seen a dietitian. Thirty-four of 38 health professionals completed the survey and 30 participated in a focus group, and it was identified the greatest barriers to delivering nutrition care were lack of referral services, knowledge or skill gaps, and time. Twenty participants (n = 10 patients and carers, n = 10 health professionals) attended four workshops and co-designed a suite of 46 novel resources rated as highly acceptable.

CONCLUSION

Improved communication, training, and availability of suitable resources could improve access to and support cancer nutrition information and care. New, co-designed cancer nutrition resources were created and deemed highly acceptable to patients, carers, and health professionals.

Unmet needs in cancer patients: Creating recommendations to overcome geographical disparities in economic growth

Cancer is a major clinical, economic and societal challenge across different world regions. Effective anticancer therapies are now available, yet the impact of these treatments on the needs of patients with cancer remains questionable, since improved survival is not frequently associated with improved quality of life. In an effort to raise patients' needs at the core of anticancer therapies, the importance of nutritional support has become recognized by international scientific societies. It is recognized that the needs of patients with cancer are universal, yet the economic and societal status of any country influence the availability and implementation of nutritional care. The Middle East is a geographic area in which major differences in economic growth coexist. Consequently, it appears reasonable that international guidelines on nutritional care in oncology are reviewed to highlight those recommendations which could be universally adopted and those which may need a progressive implementation. To this end, a group of Middle East healthcare professionals working in cancer centers across the region gathered to develop a list of recommendations to be implemented in daily practice. This would translate in a likely better acceptance and delivery of nutritional care, aligning all Middle East cancer centers to the quality standards now available only in selected hospital across the region.

Assessing Impact of Nutrition Care by Registered Dietitian Nutritionists on Patient Medical and Treatment Outcomes in Outpatient Cancer Clinics: A Cohort Feasibility Study

More information is needed about the impact of outpatient nutrition care from a registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) on patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of a cohort study design to evaluate impact of RDN nutrition care on patient outcomes, describe clinic malnutrition screening practices, and estimate statistical parameters for a larger study. Seventy-seven patients with lung, esophageal, colon, rectal, or pancreatic cancer from six facilities were included (41 received RDN care and 36 did not). RDN nutrition care was prospectively documented for six months and documented emergency room visits, unplanned hospitalizations and treatment changes were retrospectively abstracted from medical records. Most facilities used the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) to determine malnutrition risk. Patients receiving RDN care had, on average, five, half hour visits and had more severe disease and higher initial malnutrition risk, although this varied across sites. Documented medical and treatment outcomes were relatively rare and similar between groups. Estimated sample size requirements varied from 113 to 5856, depending on tumor type and outcome, and intracluster correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged from 0 to 0.47. Overall, the methods used in this study are feasible but an interventional or implementation design might be advantageous for a larger study.

Diet-microbiome interactions in cancer treatment: Opportunities and challenges for precision nutrition in cancer

Dietary patterns contribute to cancer risk. Separately, microbial factors influence the development of several cancers. However, the interaction of diet and the microbiome and their joint contribution to cancer treatment response needs more research. The microbiome significantly impacts drug metabolism, immune activation, and response to immunotherapy. One of the critical factors affecting the microbiome structure and function is diet. Data demonstrate that the diet and microbiome composition affects the immune response. Moreover, malnutrition is a significant confounder to cancer therapy response. There is little understanding of the interaction of malnutrition with the microbiome in the context of cancer. This review aims to address the current knowledge of dietary intake patterns and malnutrition among cancer patients and the impact on treatment outcomes. Second, this review will provide evidence linking the microbiome to cancer treatment response and provide evidence of the potentially strong effect that diet could have on this interaction. This review will formulate critical questions that will need further research to understand the diet-microbiome relationship in cancer treatment response and directions for future research to guide us to precision nutrition therapy to improve cancer outcomes.

Tailoring prehabilitation to address the multifactorial nature of functional capacity for surgery

Mounting evidence suggests that recovery begins before the surgical incision. The pre-surgery phase of recovery - the preparation for optimal surgical recovery - can be reinforced with prehabilitation. Prehabilitation is the approach of enhancing the functional capacity of the individual to enable them to withstand a stressful event. With this narrative review, we apply the Wilson & Cleary conceptual model of patient outcomes to specify the complex and integrative relationship of health factors that limit functional capacity before surgery. To have the greatest impact on patient outcomes, prehabilitation programs require individualized and coordinated care from medical, nutritional, psychosocial, and exercise services. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Increased Emergency Department Utilization and Costs for Medicare Cancer Patients with Malnutrition Diagnoses

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition or its risk affects up to 70% of cancer patients. Compared to adequately nourished oncology patients, those with malnutrition experience more complications and have poorer prognoses, thus higher needs for healthcare. We compared utilization of emergency department (ED) services and costs for Medicare-covered cancer patients with or without a malnutrition diagnosis.

METHODS

We used the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Standard Analytic File to identify fee-for-service beneficiaries who had a cancer diagnosis, and had one or more outpatient claims in 2018. We totaled individual claims and costs for ED visits per beneficiary, then calculated mean per-person claims and costs for malnourished vs non-malnourished patients.

RESULTS

Using data from over 2.8 million claims of patients with cancer diagnoses, the prevalence of diagnosed malnutrition was 2.5%. The most common cancer types were genitourinary, hematologic/blood, and breast. Cancer patients with a malnutrition diagnosis, compared to those without, had a significantly higher annual total number of outpatient claims (21.4 vs. 11.5, P<.0001), including a 2.5-fold higher rate of ED visits (1.43 vs. 0.56, p<.0001). As result, such patients incurred more than 2-fold higher mean ED claim costs than did their adequately nourished counterparts ($10,724 vs. $4,935, P<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that malnutrition in cancer patients imposes a high outpatient burden on resource utilization and costs of care in terms of ED use. We propose that nutritional interventions can be used to improve health outcomes for people with cancer and to improve economic outcomes for patients and providers.

Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index for Overall Survival and Postoperative Complications in Esophageal Cancer Patients

Background

Prognostic nutritional index (PNI), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) are the most common factors to estimate nutritional and inflammatory status. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the prognostic significance of above nutritional and inflammatory indexes for overall survival (OS) and surgical complications in esophageal cancer patients.

Methods

Esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy were retrospectively collected. PNI, NLR, PLR, and SII were introduced to evaluate the baseline nutritional and inflammatory status.

Results

A total of 407 patients were included in the present study. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that PNI-low group, NLR-high group and PLR-high group, all showed a significantly shorter OS (34.38% vs 49.46%, P < 0.001; 36.13% vs 48.26%, P = 0.026 and 33.33% vs 48.52%, P = 0.001 respectively), while no significant difference was found in SII groups (42.33% vs 46.31%, P = 0.067). Multivariable analyses identified PNI (P = 0.002) was an independent prognostic factor for OS, but NLR (P = 0.672) and PLR (P = 0.186) were not. Postoperative complications occurred significantly more frequently in the low-PNI group (29.69% vs 13.26%, P < 0.001). However, no significant differences were found in the postoperative complication rates between different NLR (16.67% vs 22.69%, P = 0.124), PLR (18.03% vs 19.61%, P = 0.867) and SII (15.34% vs 20.49%, P = 0.326) groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed only PNI (P = 0.008) was an independent prognostic factor for postoperative complications.

Conclusion

Preoperative low PNI was not only an independent prognostic factor for worse survival in esophageal cancer patients but also associated with high incidence of postoperative complications.

Commentary: Quality nutrition care is integral to the Oncology Care Model

The Oncology Care Model (OCM) is a US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) specialty model implemented in 2016, to provide higher quality, more highly coordinated oncology care at the same or lower costs. Under the OCM, oncology clinics enter into payment arrangements that include financial and performance accountability for patients receiving chemotherapy treatment. In addition, OCM clinics commit to providing enhanced services to Medicare beneficiaries, including care coordination, navigation, and following national treatment guidelines. Nutrition is a component of best-practice cancer care, yet it may not be addressed by OCM providers even though up to 80% of patients with cancer develop malnutrition and poor nutrition has a profound impact on cancer treatment and survivorship. Only about half of US ambulatory oncology settings screen for malnutrition, registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs) are not routinely employed by oncology clinics, and the medical nutrition therapy they provide is often not reimbursed. Thus, adequate nutrition care in US oncology clinics remains a gap area. Some oncology clinics are addressing this gap through implementation of nutrition-focused quality improvement programs (QIPs) but many are not. What is needed is a change of perspective. This paper outlines how and why quality nutrition care is integral to the OCM and can benefit patient health and provider outcomes.

Nutrition Care Process Model Approach to Surgical Prehabilitation in Oncology

The nutrition care process is a standardized and systematic method used by nutrition professionals to assess, diagnose, treat, and monitor patients. Using the nutrition care process model, we demonstrate how nutrition prehabilitation can be applied to the pre-surgical oncology patient.

Optimal frequency of individualised nutrition counselling in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancers (HNC) are strongly associated with malnutrition. This systematic review aimed to investigate the optimal frequency of individualised nutrition counselling (INC) pre-, peri- and post-treatment for patients with HNC.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMBASE, Cinahl and Scopus were searched from inception through to April 2020 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that focused on the INC frequency for adult patients with HNC (Registration no. 178868). The outcomes assessed were nutritional status, dietary intake, weight change, treatment interruptions, unplanned hospital admissions, quality of life, complications and morbidity. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

Four RCTs were identified with five papers (n = 500 total participants). The certainty of evidence was 'high' for nutritional status and quality of life, 'moderate' for treatment interruptions and unplanned hospital admissions, and 'low' for percentage weight change, complications/morbidity and dietary intake. Compared to control groups, there were consistent improvements for nutritional status, quality of life, treatment interruptions, unplanned hospital admissions, dietary intake, percentage weight change and morbidity when weekly INC was provided peri-treatment and fortnightly INC was provided post-treatment. No statistical significance was found for treatment interruptions, dietary intake and weight change when INC was provided fortnightly peri-treatment only. There were no RCTs in the current review that offered INC pre-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review shows beneficial effects with weekly INC peri-treatment and fortnightly INC post-treatment for patients with HNC in all outcomes studied. Future research should focus on models of care to address the optimal frequency of pre-treatment INC as well as the duration of post-treatment INC.

The Association Between Computed Tomography-Defined Sarcopenia and Outcomes in Adult Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy of Curative Intent for Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT)-defined sarcopenia is a demonstrated poor prognostic factor in patients with cancer; however, its influence on outcomes for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) has not been established.

OBJECTIVE

This review synthesizes current knowledge regarding the association between CT-defined sarcopenia and outcomes for adult patients undergoing radiotherapy with or without other treatment modalities of curative intent for HNC.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature published between January 2004 and June 2019 was conducted in Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and PubMed. Empirical studies of CT-defined sarcopenia in adult patients (≥18 years) with HNC who had completed radiotherapy of curative intent with or without other treatment modalities were included. Outcomes reported included survival, prolonged radiotherapy breaks, and chemotherapy toxicity. Study quality was assessed using the American Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Quality Criteria Checklist. Synthesis of outcomes and clinical relevance was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.

RESULTS

Of 11 studies (n = 3,461) identified, 3 were positive and 8 were neutral quality. Studies were heterogeneous in HNC diagnosis, ethnicity, definition of sarcopenia, CT level of evaluation, and skeletal muscle index threshold value. Eight definitions for sarcopenia were identified with pretreatment prevalence of 6.6% to 70.9% and posttreatment prevalence of 12.4% to 65.8%. Pretreatment sarcopenia was independently associated with reduced: overall survival (OS), 3-year OS, disease-free survival, prolonged radiotherapy breaks, and chemotherapy-related toxicities. Posttreatment sarcopenia was independently associated with reduced OS and 5-year OS. The overall certainty of evidence according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria was low for OS; 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS; locoregional control; locoregional failure; progression-free survival; metastasis-free survival, disease-specific survival; and disease-free survival and very low for distant metastasis, prolonged radiotherapy breaks, and chemotherapy toxicity-related outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

CT-defined sarcopenia is independently associated with reduced OS and treatment completion in patients with HNC and holds a clinically meaningful prognostic value. The certainty of the evidence requires strengthening with further research. Understanding the impact sarcopenia has on outcomes for these patients has implications for informing potential nutrition interventions and facilitating individualized care.

A review of iPhone and Android apps for cancer patients and survivors: assessing their quality, nutrition information and behaviour change techniques

BACKGROUND

The present study reviewed the quality, nutrition content and behaviour change techniques (BCTs) of apps aimed at those with cancer.

METHODS

The Apple App Store and Androids' Google Play were searched in March 2020. Apps were scored for accountability as per Silberg's standards, quality as per the Mobile Application Rating Scale, and BCTs using the CALO-RE Taxonomy. Nutrition content was summarised and a checklist developed from the European Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ESPEN) cancer and nutrition guidelines and the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) guidelines for Cancer Survivors.

RESULTS

Twelve apps were identified, mean (SD) accountability score was 2.7/8 (2.0) (range 0-6) and quality score was 2.9/5 (0.6) (range 1.7-3.7). Overall, 11 BCTs were used (range 0-8 per app). Nutrition content focussed on healthy eating and meeting energy needs. There was a lack of strategies for implementation and no indication of whether the advice was more suited for specific cancer types, stages or treatment. Limited reference was made to recommendations of ESPEN and the WCRF. A strong positive relationship between quality and number of BCTs was found (r = 0.805, n = 9, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Little nutrition information is currently included on publicly available apps aimed at those with a cancer diagnosis.

Translating Evidence-Based Guidelines into Practice-Are We Getting It Right? A Multi-Centre Prospective International Audit of Nutrition Care in Patients with Foregut Tumors (INFORM)

Malnutrition is highly prevalent in patients with foregut tumors comprising head and neck (HNC) and esophageal (EC) cancers, negatively impacting outcomes. International evidence-based guidelines (EBGs) for nutrition care exist; however, translation of research evidence into practice commonly presents considerable challenges and consequently lags. This study aimed to describe and evaluate current international nutrition care practices compared with the best-available evidence for patients with foregut tumors who are at high risk of malnutrition. A multi-centre prospective cohort study enrolled 170 patients commencing treatment of curative intent for HNC (n = 119) or EC (n = 51) in 11 cancer care settings in North America, Europe and Australia between 2016 and 2018. Adherence criteria were derived from relevant EBG recommendations with pooled results for participating centres reported according to the Nutrition Care Model at either system or patient levels. Adherence to EBG recommendations was: good (≥80%) for performing baseline nutrition screening and assessment, perioperative nutrition assessment and nutrition prescription for energy and protein targets; moderate (≥60 to 80%) for utilizing validated screening and assessment tools and pre-radiotherapy dietitian consultation; and poor (60%) for initiating post-operative nutrition support within 24 h and also dietetic consultation weekly during radiotherapy and fortnightly for 6 weeks post-radiotherapy. In conclusion, gaps in evidence-based cancer nutrition care remain; however, this may be improved by filling known evidence gaps through high-quality research with a concurrent evolution of EBGs to also encompass practical implementation guidance. These should aim to support multidisciplinary cancer clinicians to close evidence-practice gaps throughout the patient care trajectory with clearly defined roles and responsibilities that also address patient-reported concerns.

We report performance status in oncology-but not nutritional status?

Performance status (PS) scales are used routinely in clinical oncology to evaluate functional status and help direct treatment decisions. PS is also used to determine research protocol eligibility, indicate treatment response, and evaluate toxicity in oncology clinical trials. Malnutrition (like poor PS) is associated with adverse outcomes such as lower tolerance to anti-tumor treatment, poor quality of life, and decreased survival. Nutritional status is therefore arguably as important as PS for cancer outcomes. Despite well-documented adverse consequences for patients, malnutrition also often goes undiagnosed until severe depletion is evident. If the predictive importance of nutritional status is comparable to PS, why is nutritional status not routinely used along with PS to guide treatment decisions? There is compelling evidence to support the predictive abilities of both PS and nutritional status in cancer outcomes and treatment decision-making. Perhaps, PS may be a proxy for nutritional status. Nutritional status might also serve as an effective tool for patient selection and stratification in oncology trials. Together with PS, it might provide important and distinct prognostic information; we propose both should be routinely included in outcome studies. The extent to which impaired PS may be a surrogate for malnutrition warrants investigation. Given its comparable importance to PS, it is inexcusable that nutritional status is not given the prominence it deserves as a key patient-reported outcome.

Opportunities for Quality Improvement Programs (QIPs) in the Nutrition Support of Patients with Cancer

Malnutrition in patients with cancer is a ubiquitous but neglected problem that can reduce patient survival/quality of life and increase treatment interruptions, readmission rates, and healthcare costs. Malnutrition interventions, including nutrition support through dietary counseling, diet fortification, oral nutrition supplements (ONS), and enteral and parenteral nutrition can help improve health outcomes. However, nutritional care standards and interventions for cancer are ambiguous and inconsistently applied. The lack of systematic malnutrition screening and intervention in ambulatory cancer care has especially significant consequences and thus the nutrition support of patients with cancer represents an area for quality improvement. United States healthcare payment models such as the Oncology Care Model are linked to quality of care and health outcomes. Quality improvement programs (QIPs) can advance patient-centered care, perfect care processes, and help healthcare professionals meet their quality measure performance goals. Malnutrition QIPs like the Malnutrition Quality Improvement Initiative (MQii) have been shown to be effective in identifying and treating malnutrition. However, little is known about or has been reported on nutrition or malnutrition-focused QIPs in cancer care. This paper provides information to support translational research on quality improvement and outlines the gaps and potential opportunities for QIPs in the nutrition support of patients with cancer.

Best Evidence to Best Practice: Implementing an Innovative Model of Nutrition Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Improves Outcomes

Malnutrition is prevalent in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), impacting outcomes. Despite publication of nutrition care evidence-based guidelines (EBGs), evidence–practice gaps exist. This study aimed to implement and evaluate the integration of a patient-centred, best-practice dietetic model of care into an HNC multidisciplinary team (MDT) to minimise the detrimental sequelae of malnutrition. A mixed-methods, pre–post study design was used to deliver key interventions underpinned by evidence-based implementation strategies to address identified barriers and facilitators to change at individual, team and system levels. A data audit of medical records established baseline adherence to EBGs and clinical parameters prior to implementation in a prospective cohort. Key interventions included a weekly Supportive Care-Led Pre-Treatment Clinic and a Nutrition Care Dashboard highlighting nutrition outcome data integrated into MDT meetings. Focus groups provided team-level evaluation of the new model of care. Economic analysis determined system-level impact. The baseline clinical audit (n = 98) revealed barriers including reactive nutrition care, lack of familiarity with EBGs or awareness of intensive nutrition care needs as well as infrastructure and dietetic resource limitations. Post-implementation data (n = 34) demonstrated improved process and clinical outcomes: pre-treatment dietitian assessment; use of a validated nutrition assessment tool before, during and after treatment. Patients receiving the new model of care were significantly more likely to complete prescribed radiotherapy and systemic therapy. Differences in mean percentage weight change were clinically relevant. At the system level, the new model of care avoided 3.92 unplanned admissions and related costs of $AUD121K per annum. Focus groups confirmed clear support at the multidisciplinary team level for continuing the new model of care. Implementing an evidence-based nutrition model of care in patients with HNC is feasible and can improve outcomes. Benefits of this model of care may be transferrable to other patient groups within cancer settings.

Nutrition guidance for cancer patients and survivors-A review of the websites of Irish healthcare and charitable organisations and cancer centres

OBJECTIVE

To determine availability of nutrition information for cancer patients and survivors from Irish healthcare organisations, cancer charity and support groups and assess its quality and readability.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

The National Health Service Executive websites were searched, as were the sites of the ten largest cancer charities/support groups identified through the Benefacts website. An additional internet search was conducted to ensure no large organisations/support groups were missed (February 2019). Quality of nutrition content was assessed using an evidence-based checklist and readability assessed using two validated formulas.

RESULTS

Thirty-two websites were identified, five contained nutrition information for cancer patients (15.6%), and three for cancer survivors (9.3%). The quality of the nutrition content ranged from 19.5 to 29/40 (mean ± SD, 23.2 ± 3.2; median = 21, interquartile range (IQR) = 7). There was a lack of practical strategies for implementation. Only 40% of material had an acceptable readability level (sixth-seventh grade level). Readability scores (mean ± SD) were 68.5 ± 6.0 for Flesch Reading Ease Score and 7.8 ± 1.1 for Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Score.

CONCLUSION

There is limited nutrition information on Irish health and cancer websites and in particular very few tailored to cancer survivors. Irish health and cancer organisations should consider providing nutrition information that is easily accessible to all.

Inadequate Nutrition Coverage in Outpatient Cancer Centers: Results of a National Survey

Cancer-related malnutrition is associated with poor health outcomes, including decreased tolerance to cancer therapy, greater treatment toxicities, and increased mortality. Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) optimizes clinical outcomes, yet registered dietitian nutritionists (RDNs), the healthcare professionals specifically trained in MNT, are not routinely employed in outpatient cancer centers where over 90% of all cancer patients are treated. The objective of this study was to evaluate RDN staffing patterns, nutrition services provided in ambulatory oncology settings, malnutrition screening practices, and referral and reimbursement practices across the nation in outpatient cancer centers. An online questionnaire was developed by the Oncology Nutrition Dietetic Practice Group (ON DPG) of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics and distributed via the ON DPG electronic mailing list. Complete data were summarized for 215 cancer centers. The mean RDN full-time equivalent (FTE) for all centers was 1.7 ± 2.0. After stratifying by type of center, National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers (NCI CCs) employed a mean of 3.1 ± 3.0 RDN FTEs compared to 1.3 ± 1.4 amongst non-NCI CCs. The RDN-to-patient ratio, based on reported analytic cases, was 1 : 2,308. Per day, RDNs evaluated and counseled an average of 7.4 ± 4.3 oncology patients. Approximately half (53.1%) of the centers screened for malnutrition, and 64.9% of these facilities used a validated malnutrition screening tool. The majority (76.8%) of centers do not bill for nutrition services. This is the first national study to evaluate RDN staffing patterns, provider-to-patient ratios, and reimbursement practices in outpatient cancer centers. These data indicate there is a significant gap in RDN access for oncology patients in need of nutritional care.

Helping Patients Eat Better During and Beyond Cancer Treatment: Continued Nutrition Management Throughout Care to Address Diet, Malnutrition, and Obesity in Cancer

Cancer patients and survivors are at risk of poor clinical outcomes due to poor nutritional intake following cancer diagnosis. During cancer treatment, treatment toxicities can affect eating patterns and can lead to malnutrition resulting in loss of lean body mass and excessive weight loss. Following treatment and throughout survivorship, patients are at risk of not meeting national nutrition guidelines for cancer survivors, which can affect recurrence and survival. Obesity, which is highly prevalent in cancer patients and survivors, can affect clinical outcomes during treatment by masking malnutrition and is also a risk factor for cancer recurrence and poorer survival in some cancers. Appropriate and effective nutritional education and guidance by trained clinicians are needed throughout the cancer continuum. This article presents an overview of recommendations and guidelines for nutrition and weight management and provides recent examples of behavioral theory-based targeted lifestyle interventions designed to increase adherence to recommendation by cancer patients and survivors.