1
|
Floyd AS, Silcox J, Strickler G, Nong T, Blough M, Bolivar D, Rabin M, Bratberg J, Irwin AN, Hartung DM, Hansen RN, Bohler R, Green TC. Policies, adaptations, and ongoing challenges to naloxone, buprenorphine and nonprescription syringe access across four-states: Findings from an environmental scan and key informant interviews. DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE REPORTS 2024; 11:100243. [PMID: 38948428 PMCID: PMC11214408 DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Background As the US opioid-involved morbidity and mortality increase, uptake and implementation of evidence-based interventions remain key policy responses. Respond to Prevent was a multi-component, randomized trial implemented in four states and two large pharmacy chains with the aim of improving the pharmacy's capacity to provide naloxone, dispense buprenorphine, and sell nonprescription syringes (NPS). We sought to provide context and assess how policies and organizational practices affect communities and pharmacies across the study states. Methods Using a multi-method approach we: 1) conducted an environmental scan of published literature and online materials spanning January 2015 to June 2021, 2) created timelines of key events pertaining to those policies and practices and 3) conducted semi-structured interviews with stakeholders (key informants) at the state and local levels (N=36) to provide further context for the policies and practices we discovered. Results Key informants discussed state policies, pharmacy policies and local practices that facilitated access to naloxone, buprenorphine and NPSs. Interviewees from all states spoke about the impact of naloxone standing orders, active partnerships with community-based harm reduction organizations, and some federal and state policies like Medicaid coverage for naloxone and buprenorphine, and buprenorphine telehealth permissions as key facilitators. They also discussed patient stigma, access in rural settings, and high cost of medications as barriers. Conclusion Findings underscore the important role harm reduction-related policies play in boosting and institutionalizing interventions in communities and pharmacies while also identifying structural barriers where more focused state and local attention is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony S. Floyd
- Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph Silcox
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Gail Strickler
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Thuong Nong
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Malcolm Blough
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Derek Bolivar
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Megan Rabin
- Northeastern University, Bouve College of Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Bratberg
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston, RI, USA
| | | | | | - Ryan N. Hansen
- The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Robert Bohler
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
- Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health at Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA
| | - Traci C. Green
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
- Departments of Emergency Medicine and Epidemiology, Brown Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Irwin AN, Gray M, Ventricelli D, Boggis JS, Bratberg J, Floyd AS, Silcox J, Hartung DM, Green TC. "I go out of my way to give them an extra smile now:" A study of pharmacists who participated in Respond to Prevent, a community pharmacy intervention to accelerate provision of harm reduction materials. Res Social Adm Pharm 2024; 20:512-519. [PMID: 38395644 PMCID: PMC10981567 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 02/03/2024] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community pharmacies are well-positioned to improve the health of people with opioid use disorder and who use drugs by providing naloxone and other essential public health supplies. Respond to Prevent (R2P) is a clinical trial which sought to accelerate provision of harm reduction materials through a multicomponent intervention that included in-store materials, online training, and academic detailing. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to explore pharmacists' attitudes, knowledge, and experiences in providing naloxone, dispensing buprenorphine, and selling nonprescription syringes following participation in the R2P program. METHODS Two online asynchronous focus groups were conducted with community-based chain pharmacists across Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Oregon, and Washington who had participated in the R2P program. Participants accessed an online repository of group interview items and responded to questions over a short period. Each pharmacist participated anonymously for approximately 30 min over 2 ½ days. Pharmacists answered questions on experiences with pharmacy-based harm reduction care and R2P intervention implementation barriers and facilitators. Qualitative data analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary team using an immersion-crystallization approach. RESULTS A total of 32 pharmacists participated in the two focus groups. Most participants were female (n = 18, 56%), non-Hispanic (n = 29, 91%), and white (n = 17, 53%). Four major themes were identified related to (1) addressing bias and stigma toward people with opioid use disorder and who use drugs, (2) familiarity and comfort with naloxone provision, (3) perspective and practice shifts in nonprescription syringe sales, (4) structural challenges to harm reduction care in the pharmacy. CONCLUSIONS Community pharmacists across the four states identified attitudes, knowledge, and experiences that create barriers to providing care to people with opioid use disorder and who use drugs. R2P approaches and tools were effective at reducing stigma and changing attitudes but were less effective at addressing structural challenges from the pharmacists' perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriane N Irwin
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | | | - Daniel Ventricelli
- Indivior, Inc., North Chesterfield, VA, USA; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Philadelphia College of Pharmacy at University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jesse S Boggis
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, USA; Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Bratberg
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Research, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Anthony S Floyd
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Addictions, Drug & Alcohol Institute, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Joseph Silcox
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA; Department of Sociology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel M Hartung
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Oregon State University College of Pharmacy, Corvallis, OR, USA
| | - Traci C Green
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, Heller School for Social Policy & Management at Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA; Departments of Emergency Medicine and Epidemiology, Brown Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Green TC, Silcox J, Bolivar D, Gray M, Floyd AS, Irwin AN, Hansen RN, Hartung DM, Bratberg J. Pharmacy staff-reported adaptations to naloxone provision and over-the-counter (OTC) syringe sales during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences across multiple states and 2 pharmacy chains. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2024; 64:71-78. [PMID: 37863398 PMCID: PMC11014459 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Access to harm reduction materials was greatly disrupted during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Community pharmacies often continued provision of harm reduction materials as part of their usual operations during the pandemic, but little is known about what, if any, adaptations were made and the perceived impact of these actions from the perspective of pharmacy staff. OBJECTIVES We explored how pharmacy staff across 4 states in 2 major pharmacy chains adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic for ongoing naloxone and over-the-counter (OTC) syringe access and how staff perceived the pandemic affected drug use in the community they served and their pharmacy's volume of syringe sales and naloxone provision. METHODS We analyzed 134 pharmacy staff responses to a 12-month follow-up assessment for an educational intervention conducted in 2 pharmacy chains in Oregon, Washington, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. Respondents answered closed- and open-ended questions collected online from July 2020 to February 2022. Questions measured prevalence of adaptations and perceived uptake of naloxone and OTC syringe services. Descriptive statistics summarized adaptations and perceived impact and chi-square tests explored differences by state and pharmacy chain. Open-ended responses were reviewed and analyzed to identify summary points and themes. RESULTS With few differences by state or pharmacy chain detected, pharmacy staff reported more naloxone mailing, requests by phone, streamlined counseling, and drive-thru provision adaptations to OTC syringe sales and naloxone provision during the pandemic. Most staff perceived adaptations as increasing or maintaining naloxone provision and OTC syringe sales. Respondents described specific aspects of the pharmacy that contributed to successful adaptations, including tailoring to specific product demand, inventory levels, drive-thru access, and a perception of extraordinary public health need at a time of and in places affected by the opioid crisis. CONCLUSIONS Pharmacy OTC syringe and naloxone access continued during the COVID-19 pandemic through streamlining workflows and innovating no-contact harm reduction services, reinforcing pharmacy's public health role.
Collapse
|
4
|
Jarrett JB, Bratberg J, Burns AL, Cochran G, DiPaula BA, Dopp AL, Elmes A, Green TC, Hill LG, Homsted F, Hsia SL, Matthews ML, Ghitza UE, Wu LT, Bart G. Research Priorities for Expansion of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment in the Community Pharmacy. Subst Abus 2023; 44:264-276. [PMID: 37902032 PMCID: PMC10870734 DOI: 10.1177/08897077231203849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
In the last decade, the U.S. opioid overdose crisis has magnified, particularly since the introduction of synthetic opioids, including fentanyl. Despite the benefits of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD), only about a fifth of people with opioid use disorder (OUD) in the U.S. receive MOUD. The ubiquity of pharmacists, along with their extensive education and training, represents great potential for expansion of MOUD services, particularly in community pharmacies. The National Institute on Drug Abuse's National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (NIDA CTN) convened a working group to develop a research agenda to expand OUD treatment in the community pharmacy sector to support improved access to MOUD and patient outcomes. Identified settings for research include independent and chain pharmacies and co-located pharmacies within primary care settings. Specific topics for research included adaptation of pharmacy infrastructure for clinical service provision, strategies for interprofessional collaboration including health service models, drug policy and regulation, pharmacist education about OUD and OUD treatment, including didactic, experiential, and interprofessional curricula, and educational interventions to reduce stigma towards this patient population. Together, expanding these research areas can bring effective MOUD to where it is most needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennie B. Jarrett
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Jeffrey Bratberg
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Research, College of Pharmacy, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Anne L. Burns
- American Pharmacists Association, Washington, DC, USA (retired)
| | - Gerald Cochran
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Bethany A. DiPaula
- Department of Practice, Sciences, and Health Outcomes Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Abigail Elmes
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Traci C. Green
- COBER on Opioids and Overdose at Rhode Island Hospital and the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Opioid Policy Research Collaborative, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Lucas G. Hill
- The University of Texas at Austin, College of Pharmacy, Austin, TX, USA
| | | | - Stephanie L. Hsia
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, San Francisco School of Pharmacy, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michele L. Matthews
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Udi E. Ghitza
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), Center for the Clinical Trials Network (CCTN), Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Li-Tzy Wu
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Gavin Bart
- Department of Medicine, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gionfriddo MR, Owens KM, Leist SE, Schrum LT, Covvey JR. Attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and practices for over-the-counter syringe sales in community pharmacies: A systematic review. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2023; 63:1472-1489.e3. [PMID: 37429389 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community pharmacies are an important resource for people who inject drugs (PWID) to purchase over-the-counter (OTC) syringes. Access to sterile injection equipment can reduce the transmission of blood-borne illnesses. However, pharmacists and their staff ultimately use discretion over sales. OBJECTIVE To identify staff attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and practices in the sale of OTC syringes in community pharmacies. METHODS This systematic review was reported according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022363040). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from inception to September 2022. The review included peer-reviewed empirical studies regarding OTC syringe sales among community pharmacy staff (pharmacists, interns, and technicians). We screened records and extracted data using a predefined data extraction form. Findings were narratively synthesized, and critical appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS A total of 1895 potentially relevant articles were identified, and 35 were included. Most studies (23; 63.9%) were cross-sectional descriptive designs. All studies included pharmacists, with seven (19.4%) also including technicians, two (5.6%) including interns, and four (11.1%) including other staff. Studies found relatively high support among respondents for harm reduction-related services within community pharmacies, but less common reports of staff engaging in said services themselves. When studies investigated the perceived positive or negative impacts of OTC syringe sales, prevention of blood-borne illness was widely understood as a benefit, while improper syringe disposal and safety of the pharmacy and its staff commonly reported as concerns. Stigmatizing attitudes/beliefs toward PWID were prevalent across studies. CONCLUSION Community pharmacy staff report knowledge regarding the benefits of OTC syringes, but personal attitudes/beliefs heavily influence decisions to engage in sales. Despite support for various syringe-related harm reduction activities, offerings of services were less likely due to concerns around PWID.
Collapse
|