Changing practice patterns for cytotechnologists: a comparative analysis of data from the 2009 and 2015 ASCP BOC Practice Analysis Surveys

Benchmarking cytology support for ROSE during endoscopic and bronchoscopic procedures

INTRODUCTION

There has been an increase in endoscopic and bronchoscopic biopsies as minimally invasive methods to obtain specimens from gastrointestinal (GI) or pancreatobiliary lesions and thoracic or mediastinal lesions, respectively. As hospitals undertake more of these procedures, it is important to consider the staffing implications that this has on cytopathology laboratories with respect to support for rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Volume and time data from endoscopic ultrasound and bronchoscopic procedures (including endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirations and small biopsies with touch preparation) in the GI suite, bronchoscopy suite, or operating room were reviewed for 2 months at 2 different medical centers with ROSE services provided by cytologists or fellows physically present at the procedure and cytopathologists located remotely using telecytology. Statistical analysis was performed to investigate significant trends based on the location of the biopsies and other factors.

RESULTS

A total of 16 proceduralists performed 159 procedures and submitted 276 different specimens during 16 total weeks at 2 institutions. The total ROSE time for the on-site personnel to cover these procedures was 109.3 hours (bronchoscopy, 62.3 hours [57%]; GI, 29.8 hours [27%]; OR, 17.2 hours [16%]), which represents an average of 0.69 hour (41.4 minutes) per procedure or 0.40 hour (24.0 minutes) per part, with the shortest procedure times per sample recorded during bronchoscopy. When stratified by practice volume for individual proceduralists, the average time per specimen sample submitted was shorter for proceduralists with high volume practices and was most pronounced during bronchoscopy procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic and bronchoscopic procedures account for an increasing amount of the ROSE time for the cytology team. On average, each ROSE procedure takes 0.69 hour (41.4 minutes) or approximately 0.40 hour (24.0 minutes) per specimen, with shorter time requirements for specimens obtained in bronchoscopy procedures and for operators with high volume practices for endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspirations. This provides important benchmarking data to calculate staffing needs for cytology to provide ROSE support for different proceduralists.

Cytotechnology schools: Future outlook

Recent changes in the standard and guidelines governing the education of cytotechnologists herald in a new era of cytology education. The long-discussed move to master level education and name change of the professional to cytologist signifies an alignment with current and projected scope of mid-level diagnostic cytology practice. Cytotechnology programs going forward are charged with implementing curricular changes that prepare practitioners to perform tasks such as computer assisted screening, and cell block interpretation as well as to perform evidence-based research methods. Cytotechnology education programs are sure to face challenges particularly in student recruitment and the hiring of expert faculty. There are however opportunities for programs to develop innovative teaching techniques, recruit from underrepresented groups and collaborate to develop needed curricular resources. The future outlook for cytotechnology programs is that they are at a turning point, poised to educate the next generation of pathology extenders who will continue to be integral members of the patient care team.

One procedure-one report: the Re-Imagine Cytopathology Task Force position paper on small tissue biopsy triage in anatomic pathology

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic biopsy procedures increasingly generate multiple tissue samples from multiple sites, and frequently retrieve concurrent cytologic specimens and small core needle biopsies. There is currently lack of consensus in subspecialized practices as to whether cytopathologists or surgical pathologists should review such samples, and whether the pathology findings should be reported together or separately.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In December 2021, the American Society of Cytopathology convened the Re-Imagine Cytopathology Task Force to examine various workflows that would facilitate unified pathology reporting of concurrently obtained biopsies and improve clinical care.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

This position paper summarizes the key points and highlights the advantages, challenges, and resources available to support the implementation of such workflows that result in "one procedure-one report".

Employer Expectations for the MS-Level Cytology Practitioner

OBJECTIVES

The specific aims of the study are to determine skillsets most valuable to regional employers of cytotechnologists and assess the employers' willingness to use graduating MS cytology practitioners in the expanded scope of practice.

METHODS

Data from the greater New York region were collected via a web-based survey distributed to a broad sample of laboratory professionals involved with hiring in a variety of institutions.

RESULTS

The three skillsets most important to New York employers and most employable are fine-needle aspiration adequacy assessment, regulatory acumen, and prescreening cell blocks. The skills that are of least important and least employable are prescreening high-volume tissue biopsy specimens and histology.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this survey shed light on regional employers' perspectives regarding the skillsets that are most important and marketable in the greater New York region and may be useful for subsequent curriculum development.

Voices from the Field: Supporting the Educational Needs of Cytotechnologists

Introduction

Sustaining a well-trained, competitive, and marketable cytotechnology workforce is a major goal of the American Society of Cytopathology/American Society for Clinical Pathology Workgroup Focusing on Emerging Roles in Cytopathology (ASC/ASCP Workgroup). This article describes the data collection initiatives performed by the Workgroup to confirm cytotechnologist (CT) perceived educational needs to keep pace with emerging practice changes in the workplace. In response to data collected, the Workgroup created Advanced Cytopathology Education (ACE)da unique, innovative educational resource designed to fulfill this need.

Materials and Methods

Data collection efforts included annual needs assessment surveys to gauge CT participants' preferred topics and learning modalities. These data were used to design and prioritize ACE topics. Program evaluations were also administered to evaluate participants' perceptions of program quality and effectiveness at meeting their educational needs.

Results

Research findings reveal CT education needs to align with emerging practice areas as reported in other Workgroup data collection efforts. The incorporation of new entry-level competencies in cytotechnology training programs prepares new CT graduates, but there is no standardized mechanism for formal, robust, and recognized ongoing education for other practicing CTs.

Conclusions

This article highlights the educational endeavors carried out by the Workgroup in fulfilling the educational needs of practicing CTs as communicated through various data collection efforts. As CT responsibilities evolve, ASC and Workgroup efforts will continue to focus on providing educational support for current practicing CTs who need training in emerging practice areas.

Voices from the field: supporting the educational needs of cytotechnologists

INTRODUCTION

Sustaining a well-trained, competitive, and marketable cytotechnology workforce is a major goal of the American Society of Cytopathology/American Society for Clinical Pathology Workgroup Focusing on Emerging Roles in Cytopathology (ASC/ASCP Workgroup). This article describes the data collection initiatives performed by the Workgroup to confirm cytotechnologist (CT) perceived educational needs to keep pace with emerging practice changes in the workplace. In response to data collected, the Workgroup created Advanced Cytopathology Education (ACE)-a unique, innovative educational resource designed to fulfill this need.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data collection efforts included annual needs assessment surveys to gauge CT participants' preferred topics and learning modalities. These data were used to design and prioritize ACE topics. Program evaluations were also administered to evaluate participants' perceptions of program quality and effectiveness at meeting their educational needs.

RESULTS

Research findings reveal CT education needs to align with emerging practice areas as reported in other Workgroup data collection efforts. The incorporation of new entry-level competencies in cytotechnology training programs prepares new CT graduates, but there is no standardized mechanism for formal, robust, and recognized ongoing education for other practicing CTs.

CONCLUSIONS

This article highlights the educational endeavors carried out by the Workgroup in fulfilling the educational needs of practicing CTs as communicated through various data collection efforts. As CT responsibilities evolve, ASC and Workgroup efforts will continue to focus on providing educational support for current practicing CTs who need training in emerging practice areas.