Results from the 2019 American Society of Cytopathology survey on rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE)-part 2: subjective views among the cytopathology community

Benchtop fine needle aspirations: An untapped source of cytologic educational material

Fine needle aspirations (FNAs) are a valuable tool for the diagnosis of a wide variety of lesions. However, obtaining proficiency in performing FNAs and finding simulated scenarios where one can practice specimen adequacy and slide smearing can all be challenging. Benchtop FNAs of fresh surgical specimens offer a novel training opportunity that addresses these needs. In this study, we describe the feasibility and practicality of benchtop FNAs of fresh surgical specimens as a training tool. We performed benchtop FNAs on multiple specimen types, although most were partial and radical nephrectomies. We documented this approach to cytology training and have provided examples of slides that were generated, along with the surgical pathology correlate. Our results suggest that benchtop FNAs of fresh surgical specimens can be a valuable training tool in the arsenal of today's cytopathologist. This technique offers several advantages over traditional training methods, including the ability to generate high-quality cytology slides, provide cyto-histo correlation, and practice almost immediate gross-microscopic correlation. However, there are also some disadvantages to this approach, including the need for immediate access to fresh surgical specimens and the potential for artifacts to be introduced. Overall, we believe that benchtop FNAs of fresh surgical specimens offer a promising new training tool that can maximize training opportunities, especially in institutions where the FNA volume is low.

Rapid Remote Online Evaluation in Endoscopic Diagnostics: An Analysis of Biopsy-Proven Respiratory Cytopathology

BACKGROUND

This prospective study assesses the use of rapid remote online cytological evaluation for diagnosing endoscopical achieved biopsies. It focuses on its effectiveness in identifying benign and malignant conditions using digital image processing.

METHODS

The study was conducted between April 2021 and September 2022 and involved analyses of 314 Rapid Remote Online Cytological Evaluations in total (154 imprint cytologies, 143 fine needle aspirations and 17 brush cytologies) performed on 239 patients at the LungenClinic Grosshansdorf. During on-site evaluation via telecytology, the time requirement was recorded and the findings were compared with the cyto-/histological and final diagnoses.

RESULTS

By means of rapid remote online evaluation, findings of 86 cytological benign, 190 malignant and 38 unclear diagnoses were recorded (Ø assessment time, 100 s; range, 11-370 s). In 27 of the 37 specimens with unclear diagnoses, the final findings were malignant tumours and only 6 were benign changes. The diagnosis of another 4 of these 37 findings remained unclear. Excluding these 37 specimens, rapid remote online evaluation achieved a sensitivity of 90.5% with a specificity of 98.5% and a correct classification rate of 92.4% with regard to the final diagnosis of all cases. As expected, an increase in the sensitivity rate for the cytological detection of malignant tumours (76.1% vs. 92.5%) was found especially in fine-needle aspirations.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid remote online analysis allows the fast quantitative and qualitative evaluation of clinically obtained cytological specimens. With a correct classification rate of more than 93%, sampling deficiencies can be corrected promptly and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches can be derived.

Rapid On-site Evaluation Practice Variability Appraisal (ROSE PETAL) survey

BACKGROUND

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is frequently used during diagnostic procedures in patients with or suspected to have lung cancer. There is variation in ROSE use among bronchoscopists, and discussion of ROSE results can have significant consequences for patients. This study was performed to define ROSE practice and result disclosure patterns among bronchoscopists.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was performed using an electronic survey disseminated to the members of the American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology and the Society for Advanced Bronchoscopy. The questions centered around ROSE availability, utilization, barriers, and discussion of results with patients.

RESULTS

There were 137 respondents. Most identified themselves as interventional pulmonologists (109, 80%); most respondents worked in an academic setting (71, 52%). Availability of ROSE was reported by 121 (88%) respondents. Time constraints (28%), availability of cytology (22%), and scheduling conflicts (20%) were the most reported barriers to ROSE use. Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (85%) and nonrobotic peripheral bronchoscopy (65%) were the most reported procedures that used ROSE. There was heterogeneity regarding discussion of ROSE results with the patient or their caregiver in the immediate postprocedure setting: yes - always (40, 33%), yes - sometimes (32, 26%), yes - rarely (18, 15%), or no (31, 26%). Thirty-eight respondents reported they believed ROSE was ≥90% concordant with final cytology results.

CONCLUSIONS

The results confirmed the heterogeneity of practice patterns. Estimates of ROSE-final cytology concordance were lower than previously published concordance results. Notably, the discussion of ROSE results varied significantly.

Accuracy of definitive rapid onsite evaluation cytopathology diagnoses: Assessment of potentially critical diagnoses as a quality assurance measure

INTRODUCTION

Intraprocedural rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE) of cytology specimens enhances cytopathology practice. More recently, ROSE diagnoses, like frozen section (FS) diagnoses, have guided immediate clinical decisions. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of definitive ROSE diagnoses in our quality assurance system over a 52-month period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cytopathology cases with ROSE from January 2017 to April 2021were retrieved from our laboratory information system. After excluding cases that were deferred or nondiagnostic/unsatisfactory, each definitive ROSE diagnosis (ie, negative for malignant cells or positive for malignant cells) was categorized as having agreement or disagreement with the final diagnosis. For comparison, concordance of FS diagnoses from the same time period were tabulated and compared to those of ROSE diagnoses by using χ² testing with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 1649 ROSE diagnoses, there were 15 disagreements (0.9%) with 1 final moderate interpretive disagreement (0.06%). By comparison, of the 17,469 FS diagnoses, there were 141 disagreements (0.8%) with 49 final moderate or major interpretive disagreements (0.3%). The remaining disagreements were minor. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of final moderate and major interpretive disagreements.

CONCLUSIONS

The final interpretive disagreement rates for definitive ROSE and FS diagnoses were similar in this study. Given the expanding role of ROSE and its use for immediate clinical decisions in some cases, monitoring the accuracy of definitive diagnoses may serve as an initial quality assurance measure.

Comparison of sampling methods for next generation sequencing for patients with lung cancer

Introduction

Success of next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis is becoming indispensable in the treatment of advanced lung cancer. However, the advantages and disadvantages of each sampling method in the NGS analysis have not yet been clarified.

Methods

We compared the success rates of NGS analysis, and DNA and RNA yields for transbronchial biopsy (TBB), endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS‐TBNA), computed tomography (CT)‐guided biopsy, fluid sample, and surgical biopsy for NGS analysis in patients through the lung cancer genomic screening project for individualized medicine (LC‐SCRUM)‐Asia, a nationwide NGS screening project. In case, sufficient samples could not be collected by TBB and EBUS‐TBNA, re‐biopsy (genome re‐biopsy) was performed.

Results

A total of 223 patients were enrolled and success rates of NGS analysis were not different between samples obtained through TBB, EBUS‐TBNA, and CT‐guided biopsy; however, success rates for fluid samples and surgical biopsy samples were significantly higher than those of other methods. The risk of genome re‐biopsy was higher with TBB for centrally located lesions. CT‐guided biopsy yielded more samples but had a lower success rate for analysis of RNA‐based NGS than TBB.

Conclusions

TBB is the mainstay of sampling methods, but for centrally located lesions, EBUS‐TBNA may be a better strategy. For CT‐guided biopsy, the success rate of RNA‐based NGS analysis is low. Fluid samples are expected to yield successful results as surgical biopsy samples, but the latter are better for sample preservation. Determining the optimal method for genome biopsy for each case is important.

Molecular cytology of the respiratory tract and pleura

There is growing evidence that molecular testing is feasible on all types of cytological preparation, which is fortunate as more diagnostic markers and biomarkers for targeted therapies are discovered for use in pulmonary and pleural malignancies. In this article we will discuss the pre-analytic, analytic, and post-analytic (interpretive) considerations for successful implementation of molecular tests for diagnostic and predictive markers in respiratory and pleural cytology. The vast majority of laboratories are familiar with, and have validated their molecular protocols for, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded surgical specimens, which are not directly applicable to cytology specimens. Thus, rigorous validation must be performed for each type of fixative and cytology preparation before it is implemented in the clinical setting.

Utility of the Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology during rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of salivary gland aspirates

OBJECTIVE

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is a fine needle aspiration (FNA) technique for ensuring sampling adequacy and triaging samples. The Milan system for reporting salivary gland cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a standardised reporting system which aims to improve risk stratification. There is scant literature on the diagnostic value and agreement of MSRSGC on ROSE with final cytological diagnosis in salivary gland FNAs. We aimed to assess the concordance of MSRSCG categorisation and diagnosis on ROSE with final cytological and histological diagnosis.

METHODS

This prospective study included consecutive salivary gland FNAs for which ROSE was performed over a six-month period. MSRSGC category and diagnosis on ROSE were compared with the final cytological diagnosis and MSRSGC category, and histopathological diagnosis, where available.

RESULTS

Sixty salivary gland aspirates were included. The adequacy rate with ROSE was 100%. Using the MSRSGC classification during ROSE, 26 (43.2%) samples were categorised as benign neoplasm, 21 (35%) as malignant neoplasm, 9 (15%) as non-neoplastic, and one each (1.7%) belonged to the remaining four categories. MSRSGC categorisation on ROSE concurred with final the cytological diagnosis in 58/60 cases (96.7%). Discrepancies in MSRSGC categories on ROSE included one atypia of undetermined significance with final report as non-neoplastic, and one non-diagnostic as suspicious for malignancy. Good correlation of MSRSGC categories on ROSE with final histopathological diagnosis (88.9% concordance) was also noted.

CONCLUSIONS

MSRSGC on ROSE shows good concordance with final cytology and histopathology diagnosis, indicating that categorisation according to MSRSGC has utility in ensuring that adequate material is obtained and triaged appropriately for the diagnosis of salivary gland aspirates.

Collection and Handling of Thoracic Small Biopsy and Cytology Specimens for Ancillary Studies: Guidelines from the College of American Pathologists (CAP)

With a growing number of clinically relevant biomarkers needed to guide the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), pathologists are keenly aware of the need to collect adequate tissue not only for a diagnosis, but also for ancillary studies to provide predictive and prognostic information. Small specimens collected by minimally invasive techniques such as fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy often fall short in meeting adequacy requirements for lung cancer molecular biomarkers. The College of American Pathologists (CAP) recently published an evidence-based clinical practice guideline, “Collection and Handling of Thoracic Small Biopsy and Cytology Specimens for Ancillary Studies”, to help direct clinicians and pathology laboratory personnel to optimally collect and handle thoracic small specimens for ancillary testing. This review summarizes the published guideline statements and provides a brief overview of the recommendations and how they impact the practice of pathology.