Immune recognition of lysyl-tRNA synthetase and isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase by anti-OJ antibody-positive sera

Clinical heterogeneity and prognostic factors of anti-synthetase syndrome: a multi-centred retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) patients have heterogeneous clinical manifestations with different initial presentations, complications and outcomes. This study aimed to assess the clinical characteristics and complications in patients with ASyS, and to identify factors that were associated with the survival of ASyS patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective multicentre longitudinal study. Patients fulfilling either Connor's criteria or Solomon's criteria for ASyS were recruited. Electronic health records were reviewed until October 2022. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independent prognostic factors. Auto-antibodies were checked by commercial immunoassays.

RESULTS

A total of 205 patients (anti-Jo1 49.3%, anti-PL7 19.0%, anti-EJ 11.2%, anti-PL12 10.2% and anti-OJ 3.4%) were included. The median follow-up time was 4 years. The time from symptoms onset to diagnosis was significantly longer for non-anti-Jo1 patients (median 5 vs 3 months). Common initial presentations included myositis (56.1%), arthritis (54.6%) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) (54.1%). Patients with anti-Jo1 had significantly higher muscle enzyme levels and more arthritis. All patients with anti-EJ would develop ILD on follow-up and malignancy was noted in 28.6% of the anti-OJ positive patients; 15.6% of the patients died and pulmonary diseases (ILD or pneumonia) were the major causes. Age at diagnosis, malignancy and rapidly progressive ILD were independently associated with mortality, while joint manifestation was a protective factor.

CONCLUSION

In view of the heterogeneity of clinical presentation of ASyS, a high index of suspicion and early checking of specific autoantibodies might help prompt diagnosis of ASyS and detection of related complications.

Magnetic resonance imaging patterns revealing muscle pathology and clinical features in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVE

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are autoimmune disorders significantly impacting skeletal muscles; however, the precise correlation between muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, muscle pathology, disease subtypes and clinical characteristics remains uncertain. Thus, we investigated the association of muscle MRI findings in IIMs with muscle pathology and clinical features.

METHODS

New-onset IIM patients underwent proximal upper and/or lower limb muscle MRI. Patterns of muscle oedema on MRI were categorised into fascial, honeycomb, peripheral, foggy, dense, or coarse dot patterns and compared with inflammatory cell infiltration sites in corresponding muscle biopsies. The incidence of MRI patterns was examined in patient subgroups using myositis-specific antibodies (MSAs) and 2017 EULAR/ACR classification criteria. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the odds ratios (ORs) of MRI findings for clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Fifty-six of 85 patients underwent muscle biopsy. Foggy, honeycomb and fascial patterns at biopsy sites correlated with inflammatory cell infiltration in the endomysium (OR 11.9, P = 0.005), perimysium (OR 6.0, P = 0.014) and fascia (OR 16.9, P < 0.001), respectively. Honeycomb and foggy patterns were characteristic of patients with anti-TIF1γ or anti-Mi2 antibodies and MSA-negative dermatomyositis, and those with anti-SRP or anti-HMGCR antibodies and MSA-negative polymyositis (PM), respectively. The honeycomb pattern positively correlated with malignancy (OR 6.87, P < 0.001) and Gottron sign (OR 8.05, P = 0.002); the foggy pattern correlated with muscle weakness (OR 11.24, P = 0.005). The dense dot pattern was associated with dysphagia (OR 6.27, P = 0.006) and malignancy (OR 8.49, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Muscle MRI holds promise in predicting muscle pathology, disease subtypes and clinical manifestations of IIMs.

Comparison of Lineblot and Immunoprecipitation Methods in the Detection of Myositis-Specific and Myositis-Associated Antibodies in Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies: Consistency with Clinical Diagnoses

Background: the reference method for detection of myositis-specific and myositis-associated antibodies (MSAs and MAAs) is considered immunoprecipitation (IP), but it is routinely replaced by semi-automated methods, like lineblot (LB). Few data are available on the consistency with clinical diagnoses; thus, we aim at analysing these aspects. Methods: sixty-nine patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) were studied via LB (Myositis Antigens Profile 3 EUROLINE, Euroimmun) and IP (RNA and protein antigens). The degree of concordance between methods was calculated using Cohen's coefficient. Results: a substantial concordance was found for anti-Ku and anti-PM/Scl and a moderate concordance was found for anti-Jo1 and anti-Mi-2, while a fair concordance was found for anti-EJ, anti-SRP, and anti-Ro52 antibodies. The concordance could not be calculated for anti-OJ, anti-PL-7, anti-PL-12, anti-NXP2, anti-TIF1ɣ, and anti-MDA5, because they were only detected with one method. Multiple MSAs were found only with LB in 2/69 sera. Anti-MDA5, TIF1ɣ, NXP2 (detected via IP), and anti-Jo1 in anti-synthetase syndrome (both LB and IP) had the best concordance with clinical diagnosis. Conclusions: LB and IP show substantial concordance for PM/Scl and Ku, and moderate concordance for Jo1 and Mi-2, with a good concordance with clinical diagnoses. IP shows a high performance for DM-associated MSAs. LB seems to be more sensitive in detecting anti-Ro52 antibodies, but it identified multiple MSAs, unlike IP.

Severe finger necrosis in antisynthetase syndrome with positive anti-OJ antibodies

Key Clinical Message

In a patient with anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibody and anti-OJ antibody syndrome, interventions likes warming, prostaglandins, and antiplatelets failed. However, prednisolone pulse treatment rapidly halted disease progression. Patients with mild interstitial pneumonia, myositis, and extremity necrosis should be promptly considered for anti-synthetase syndrome and receive immunosuppression after ruling out other causes.

Abstract

Anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase (ARS) autoantibodies are myositis-specific, and patients who test positive for ARS and have common clinical features are usually diagnosed with antisynthetase antibody syndrome (antisynthetase syndrome). Anti-ARS antibodies include histidyl-tRNA synthetase-1 (Jo-1), anti-threonyl (PL-7), anti-alanyl (PL-12), anti-glycyl (EJ), anti-asparaginyl (KS), anti-tyrosyl (Ha), and anti-phenylalanyl (Zo) tRNA synthetases. Among these, anti-isoleucyl tRNA synthetase (OJ) autoantibodies are extremely rare, and patients with these are frequently complicated by interstitial pneumonia. We report the case of an older man with ARS antibody syndrome who tested positive for anti-OJ and anti-Sjögren's-syndrome-related antigen A (Ro-52) antibodies. He had muscle weakness due to myositis and unparalleled rapid and severe finger necrosis. Pulsed prednisolone effectively treated the myositis symptoms and terminated the progression of finger necrosis.

The Autoantibody Array Assay: A Novel Autoantibody Detection Method

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) and dermatomyositis (DM) are autoimmune collagen diseases. Specific autoantibodies are known to be involved in their pathogeneses, each presenting with a different clinical manifestation. Although immunoprecipitation is the gold standard method for detecting autoantibodies, it is difficult to perform in all cases owing to the use of radioisotopes. In this study, we developed a new detection method for SSc and DM autoantibodies (A-cube) using cell-free protein synthesis and examined its validity. Proteins were synthesized using wheat germ cell-free protein synthesis. A total of 100 cases of SSc, 50 cases of DM, and 82 healthy controls were examined. The validity of the method was examined by a comparison with existing test results. Anti-centromere antibody, anti-topoisomerase I antibody, anti-RNA polymerase III antibody, anti-U1RNP anti-body, anti-Jo-1 antibody, anti-TIF1γ antibody, anti-Mi-2 antibody, and anti-ARS antibody were tested for. The results suggested that A-cube is comparable with existing testing methods or has a high sensitivity or specificity. In addition, there was a case in which the diagnosis was reconsidered using the A-cube. The quality of the A-cube was ensured, and its usefulness for a comprehensive analysis was demonstrated. The A-cube can therefore contribute to the clinical assessment and treatment of SSc and DM.

Mass spectrometry-based identification of new anti-Ly and known antisynthetase autoantibodies

OBJECTIVES

To discover new and detect known antisynthetase autoantibodies (ASAs) through protein immunoprecipitation combined with gel-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (IP-MS).

METHODS

IP-MS was performed using sera of individuals showing features of antisynthetase syndrome (ASyS) without (n=5) and with (n=12) previously detected ASAs, and healthy controls (n=4). New candidate aminoacyl-tRNA-synthetase (ARS) autoantigens identified through unbiased IP-MS were confirmed by IP-western blot. A targeted IP-MS assay for various ASA specificities was developed and validated with sera of patients with known ASAs (n=16), disease controls (n=20) and healthy controls (n=25). The targeted IP-MS assay was applied in an additional cohort of patients with multiple ASyS features or isolated myositis without previously detected ASAs (n=26).

RESULTS

Autoantibodies to cytoplasmic cysteinyl-tRNA-synthetase (CARS1) were identified by IP-MS and confirmed by western blot as a new ASA specificity, named anti-Ly, in the serum of a patient with ASyS features. Rare ASAs, such as anti-OJ, anti-Zo and anti-KS, and common ASAs could also be identified by IP-MS. A targeted IP-MS approach for ASA detection was developed and validated. Application of this method in an additional cohort identified an additional patient with anti-OJ autoantibodies that were missed by line and dot immunoassays.

DISCUSSION

CARS1 is the dominant cognate ARS autoantigen of the newly discovered anti-Ly ASA specificity. Rare and common ASA specificities could be detected by both unbiased and targeted IP-MS. Unbiased and targeted IP-MS are promising methods for discovery and detection of autoantibodies, especially autoantibodies that target complex autoantigens.

Muscle pathology of antisynthetase syndrome according to antibody subtypes

Identification of antisynthetase syndrome (ASS) could be challenging due to inaccessibility and technical difficulty of the serology test for the less common non-Jo-1 antibodies. This study aimed to describe ASS antibody-specific myopathology and evaluate the diagnostic utility of myofiber HLA-DR expression. We reviewed 212 ASS muscle biopsies and compared myopathologic features among subtypes. Additionally, we compared their HLA-DR staining pattern with 602 non-ASS myositis and 140 genetically confirmed myopathies known to have an inflammatory component. We used t-test and Fisher's exact for comparisons and used sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values to assess the utility of HLA-DR expression for ASS diagnosis. RNAseq performed from a subset of myositis cases and histologically normal muscle biopsies was used to evaluate interferon (IFN)-signaling pathway-related genes. Anti-OJ ASS showed prominent myopathology with higher scores in muscle fiber (4.6 ± 2.0 vs. 2.8 ± 1.8, p = 0.001) and inflammatory domains (6.8 ± 3.2 vs. 4.5 ± 2.9, p  = 0.006) than non-OJ ASS. HLA-DR expression and IFN-γ-related genes upregulation were prominent in ASS and inclusion body myositis (IBM). When dermatomyositis and IBM were excluded, HLA-DR expression was 95.4% specific and 61.2% sensitive for ASS with a positive predictive value of 85.9% and a negative predictive value of 84.2%; perifascicular HLA-DR pattern is common in anti-Jo-1 ASS than non-Jo-1 ASS (63.1% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.0001). In the appropriate clinicopathological context, myofiber HLA-DR expression help support ASS diagnosis. The presence of HLA-DR expression suggests involvement of IFN-γ in the pathogenesis of ASS, though the detailed mechanisms have yet to be elucidated.

Deciphering the Autoantibody Response to the OJ Antigenic Complex

(1) Background: Myositis specific antibodies (MSA) are important diagnostic biomarkers. Among the rarest and most challenging MSA are anti-OJ antibodies which are associated with anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS). In contrast to the other tRNA synthetases that are targets of ASS autoantibodies (e.g Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, EJ, KS, Zo), OJ represents a macromolecular complex with several ribonucleoprotein subunits. Therefore, the choice of the antigen in autoantibody assays can be challenging. (2) Methods: We collected two independent cohorts with anti-OJ antibodies, one based on a commercial line immunoassay (LIA) (n = 39), the second based on protein immunoprecipitation (IP) (n = 15). Samples were tested using a particle-based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) system that allows for the simultaneous detection of antibodies to various autoantigens. For the detection of anti-OJ antibodies, two different antigens were deployed (KARS, IARS) on PMAT. The reactivity to the two antigens KARS and IARS was analyzed individually and combined in a score (sum of the median fluorescence intensities). (3) Results: In the cohort selection based on LIA, 3/39 (7.7%) samples were positive for anti-KARS and 7/39 (17.9%) for anti-IARS and 14/39 (35.9%) when the two antigens were combined. In contrast, in samples selected by IP the sensitivity of anti-KARS was higher: 6/15 (40.0%) samples were positive for anti-KARS, 4/15 (26.7%) for anti-IARS and 12/15 (80.0%) for the combination of the two antigens. 18/39 (46.2%) of the LIA samples generated a cytoplasmic IIF pattern (compatible with anti-synthetase antibodies), but there was no association with the antibody levels, neither with LIA nor with PMAT. (4) Conclusions: The combination of IARS and KARS might represent a promising approach for the detection of anti-OJ antibodies on a fully automated platform.

Autoantigenic properties of the aminoacyl tRNA synthetase family in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

OBJECTIVES

Autoantibodies are thought to play a key role in the pathogenesis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). However, up to 40% of IIM patients, even those with clinical manifestations of anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD), test seronegative to known myositis-specific autoantibodies. We hypothesized the existence of new potential autoantigens among human cytoplasmic aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (aaRS) in patients with IIM.

METHODS

Plasma samples from 217 patients with IIM according to 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria, including 50 patients with ASSD, 165 without, and two with unknown ASSD status were identified retrospectively, as well as age and gender-matched sera from 156 population controls, and 219 disease controls. Patients with previously documented ASSD had to test positive for at least one of the five most common anti-aaRS autoantibodies (anti-Jo1, -PL7, -PL12, -EJ, and -OJ) and present with one or more of the following clinical manifestations: interstitial lung disease, myositis, arthritis, Raynaud's phenomenon, fever, or mechanic's hands. Demographics, laboratory, and clinical data of the IIM cohort (ASSD and non-ASSD) were compared. Samples were screened using a multiplex bead array assay for presence of autoantibodies against a panel of 117 recombinant protein variants, representing 33 myositis-related proteins, including all nineteen cytoplasmic aaRS. Prospectively collected clinical data for the IIM cohort were retrieved and compared between groups within the IIM cohort and correlated with the results of the autoantibody screening. Principal component analysis was used to analyze clinical manifestations between ASSD, non-ASSD groups, and individuals with novel anti-aaRS autoantibodies.

RESULTS

We identified reactivity towards 16 aaRS in 72 of the 217 IIM patients. Twelve patients displayed reactivity against nine novel aaRS. The novel autoantibody specificities were detected in four previously seronegative patients for myositis-specific autoantibodies and eight with previously detected myositis-specific autoantibodies. IIM individuals with novel anti-aaRS autoantibodies (n = 12) all had signs of myositis, and they had either muscle weakness and/or muscle enzyme elevation, 2/12 had mechanic's hands, 3/12 had interstitial lung disease, and 2/12 had arthritis. The individuals with novel anti-aaRS and a pathological muscle biopsy all presented widespread up-regulation of major histocompatibility complex class I. The reactivities against novel aaRS could be confirmed in ELISA and western blot. Using the multiplex bead array assay, we could confirm previously known reactivities to four of the most common aaRS (Jo1, PL12, PL7, and EJ (n = 45)) and identified patients positive for anti-Zo, -KS, and -HA (n = 10) that were not previously tested. A low frequency of anti-aaRS autoantibodies was also detected in controls.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that most, if not all, cytoplasmic aaRS may become autoantigenic. Autoantibodies against new aaRS may be found in plasma of patients previously classified as seronegative with potential high clinical relevance.

Two novel anti-aminoacyl tRNA synthetase antibodies: Autoantibodies against cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase and valyl-tRNA synthetase

Anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-ARS) antibodies are useful for identifying a clinical subset of patients with inflammatory myopathies. Since the myositis of anti-ARS-positive patients is characterized by a unique set of non-myopathic manifestations, including interstitial lung disease, mechanic's hands, and arthralgia, the patients are classified as having anti-synthetase syndrome. Autoantibodies have been identified to eight kinds of ARSs. Of the other 12 ARSs, eight are components of the "OJ" multi-synthetase complex. Autoantibodies to the four remaining ARSs (CysARS, ValARS, SerARS, and TrpARS) have not been reported to be present in patients with inflammatory myopathies. In this study, we first screened samples from more than 300 Japanese patients majorly consisting of those with dermatomyositis (DM) by our established in-house ELISA to find autoantibodies against the four ARSs described above. Since sera from two DM patients specifically reacted to CysARS or ValARS, we determined their reactivities by immunoprecipitation (IP) with the corresponding recombinant proteins and IP-Western blotting with cellular extract. One patient had several features found in anti-synthetase syndrome, but the other did not. The clinical differences among the various anti-ARS antibodies should be explored in a future work.

The use of ELISA is comparable to immunoprecipitation in the detection of selected myositis-specific autoantibodies in a European population

Background

The reliable detection of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSA) provides valuable clinical information regarding prognosis, clinical progression and diagnostic confirmation.

Objectives

To evaluate the reliability of a commercial ELISA immunoassay in detecting myositis-specific autoantibodies in comparison to immunoprecipitation as the reference standard.

Methods

Serum samples were chosen from a biobank of more than 3000 samples. Samples with a confirmed MSA on Immunoprecipitation (n=116) were evaluated in duplicate by ELISA to detect Mi2, MDA5, Jo1, EJ, KS, PL-7 and PL-12 (Medical &amp; Biological Laboratories Co. Ltd, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan). Healthy control samples (n=246) confirmed autoantibody negative by immunoprecipitation were similarly assessed.

Results

There was a very good agreement between ELISA and immunoprecipitation for serum samples containing anti-Mi2, MDA5, Jo1, EJ, KS and PL-7 and PL-12 auto-antibodies. Cohen’s κ values ranged from 0.86-1 for the measured autoantibodies on ELISA.

Conclusion

ELISA was an accurate method for detecting anti-synthetase, anti-Mi2 and anti-MDA5 autoantibodies.

Profiling of Myositis Specific Antibodies and Composite Scores as an Aid in the Differential Diagnosis of Autoimmune Myopathies

(1) Background: Myositis specific antibodies (MSA) represent important diagnostic and stratification tools in idiopathic inflammatory myositis (IIM) patients. Here we aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of MSA profiled by a novel particle based multi-analyte technology (PMAT) in IIM and subsets thereof. (2) Methods: 264 IIM patients and 200 controls were tested for MSA using PMAT (Inova Diagnostics, research use only). Diagnostic performance was analyzed and composite scores were generated. (3) Results: The sensitivity/specificity of the individual MSA were: 19.7%/100% (Jo-1), 7.2%/100.0% (Mi-2), 3.0%/99.0% (NXP2), 3.8%/100.0% (SAE), 2.7%/100.0% (PL-7), 1.9%/99.5 (PL-12), 1.1%/100.0% (EJ), 15.5%/99.5% (TIF1γ), 8.3%/98.5% (MDA5), 6.1%/99.0% (HMGCR) and 1.9%/98.5% (SRP). Of all IIM patients, 180/264 tested positive for at least one of the MSAs. In the individual control group, 12/200 (6.0%) tested positive for at least one MSA, most of which had levels close to the cut-off (except one SRP and one PL-12). Only 6/264 (2.3%) IIM patients were positive for more than one antibody (MDA5/HMGCR, EJ/PL-7, 2 x MDA5/TIF1γ, EJ/SAE, SAE/TIF1γ). The overall sensitivity was 68.2% paired with a specificity of 94.0%, leading to an odds ratio of 33.8. The composite scores showed good discrimination between subgroups (e.g., anti-synthetase syndrome). (4) Conclusion: MSA, especially when combined in composite scores (here measured by PMAT), provide value in stratification of patients with IIM.