Helix 12 stabilization contributes to basal transcriptional activity of PXR

Induction effect of antiretroviral bictegravir on the expression of Abcb1, Abcg2 and Abcc1 genes associated with P-gp, BCRP and MRP1 transporters present in rat peripheral blood mononuclear cells

BACKGROUND

Antiretrovirals have the potential to cause drug interactions leading to inefficacy or toxicity via induction of efflux transporters through nuclear receptors, altering drug concentrations at their target sites.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study used molecular dynamic simulations and qRT-PCR to investigate bictegravir's interactions with nuclear receptors PXR and CAR, and its effects on efflux transporters (P-gp, BCRP, MRP1) in rat PBMCs. PBMC/plasma drug concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS to assess the functional impact of transporter expression.

RESULTS

Bictegravir significantly increased the expression of ABC transporters, with Car identified as a key mediator. This suggests that bictegravir's influence on nuclear receptors could affect drug transport and efficacy at the cellular level.

CONCLUSIONS

Bictegravir activates nuclear receptors enhancing efflux transporter expression. Understanding these interactions is crucial for preventing drug-drug interactions and reducing toxicity in clinical use. Combining CAR antagonists with bictegravir may prevent drug resistance and toxicity. However, these findings are based on preclinical data and necessitate further clinical trials to confirm their applicability in clinical settings.

Molecular Dynamic Simulation To Reveal the Mechanism Underlying MGL-3196 Resistance to Thyroxine Receptor Beta

Thyroxine receptor beta (TRβ) is a ligand-dependent nuclear receptor that participates in regulating multiple biological processes, particularly playing an important role in lipid metabolism regulation. TRβ is currently a popular therapeutic target for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), while no drugs have been approved to treat this disease. MGL-3196 (Resmetirom) is the first TRβ agonist that has succeeded in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of NASH; therefore, studying its molecular mechanism of action is of great significance. In this study, we employed molecular dynamic simulation to investigate the interaction mode between MGL-3196 and TRβ at the all-atom level. More importantly, by comparing the binding patterns of MGL-3196 in several prevalent TRβ mutants, it was identified that the mutations R243Q and H435R located, respectively, around and within the ligand-binding pocket of TRβ cause TRβ to be insensitive to MGL-3196. This indicates that patients with NASH carrying these two mutations may exhibit resistance to the medication of MGL-3196, thereby highlighting the potential impact of TRβ mutations on TRβ-targeted treatment of NASH and beyond.

Chemical manipulation of an activation/inhibition switch in the nuclear receptor PXR

Nuclear receptors are ligand-activated transcription factors that can often be useful drug targets. Unfortunately, ligand promiscuity leads to two-thirds of receptors remaining clinically untargeted. PXR is a nuclear receptor that can be activated by diverse compounds to elevate metabolism, negatively impacting drug efficacy and safety. This presents a barrier to drug development because compounds designed to target other proteins must avoid PXR activation while retaining potency for the desired target. This problem could be avoided by using PXR antagonists, but these compounds are rare, and their molecular mechanisms remain unknown. Here, we report structurally related PXR-selective agonists and antagonists and their corresponding co-crystal structures to describe mechanisms of antagonism and selectivity. Structural and computational approaches show that antagonists induce PXR conformational changes incompatible with transcriptional coactivator recruitment. These results guide the design of compounds with predictable agonist/antagonist activities and bolster efforts to generate antagonists to prevent PXR activation interfering with other drugs.

[Understanding the Underlying Mechanism of Xenobiotic-Sensing Nuclear Receptor Activation]

The nuclear receptor superfamily comprises 48 members in humans. In various organs, nuclear receptors regulate a variety of physiological functions through transcription of target genes. They are associated with the development and progression of endocrine and metabolic disorders, as well as with cancer development. Therefore, agonists and antagonists targeting nuclear receptors are currently being developed as therapeutic drugs for these diseases. Nuclear receptors can be activated through ligand binding or phosphorylation, which is mediated by various cellular signaling pathways. Activation of a nuclear receptor necessitates significant structural modifications in each of its domains. My research has been focused on unraveling the intricate mechanisms underlying the activation of nuclear receptors using constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and pregnane X receptor (PXR) as model nuclear receptor proteins. CAR and PXR are highly expressed in the liver and are activated by a wide range of xenobiotics. Given their crucial roles in the metabolism and disposition of xenobiotics, as well as their potential in mediating drug-drug interactions, it is imperative to extensively study the mechanisms of xenobiotic-induced activation of these receptors. Such studies are essential for advancements in drug development, as well as for ensuring food and chemical safety. In this review, I elucidate the molecular basis underlying the activation of xenobiotic-responsive nuclear receptors.

Exploring Ligand Binding Domain Dynamics in the NRs Superfamily

Nuclear receptors (NRs) are transcription factors that play an important role in multiple diseases, such as cancer, inflammation, and metabolic disorders. They share a common structural organization composed of five domains, of which the ligand-binding domain (LBD) can adopt different conformations in response to substrate, agonist, and antagonist binding, leading to distinct transcription effects. A key feature of NRs is, indeed, their intrinsic dynamics that make them a challenging target in drug discovery. This work aims to provide a meaningful investigation of NR structural variability to outline a dynamic profile for each of them. To do that, we propose a methodology based on the computation and comparison of protein cavities among the crystallographic structures of NR LBDs. First, pockets were detected with the FLAPsite algorithm and then an "all against all" approach was applied by comparing each pair of pockets within the same sub-family on the basis of their similarity score. The analysis concerned all the detectable cavities in NRs, with particular attention paid to the active site pockets. This approach can guide the investigation of NR intrinsic dynamics, the selection of reference structures to be used in drug design and the easy identification of alternative binding sites.

PXR Suppresses PPARα-Dependent HMGCS2 Gene Transcription by Inhibiting the Interaction between PPARα and PGC1α

Background: PXR is a xenobiotic-responsive nuclear receptor that controls the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes. Drug-induced activation of PXR sometimes causes drug–drug interactions due to the induced metabolism of co-administered drugs. Our group recently reported a possible drug–drug interaction mechanism via an interaction between the nuclear receptors CAR and PPARα. As CAR and PXR are structurally and functionally related receptors, we investigated possible crosstalk between PXR and PPARα. Methods: Human hepatocyte-like HepaRG cells were treated with various PXR ligands, and mRNA levels were determined by quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Reporter assays using the HMGCS2 promoter containing a PPARα-binding motif and mammalian two-hybrid assays were performed in HepG2 or COS-1 cells. Results: Treatment with PXR activators reduced the mRNA levels of PPARα target genes in HepaRG cells. In reporter assays, PXR suppressed PPARα-dependent gene expression in HepG2 cells. In COS-1 cells, co-expression of PGC1α, a common coactivator of PPARα and PXR, enhanced PPARα-dependent gene transcription, which was clearly suppressed by PXR. Consistently, in mammalian two-hybrid assays, the interaction between PGC1α and PPARα was attenuated by ligand-activated PXR. Conclusion: The present results suggest that ligand-activated PXR suppresses PPARα-dependent gene expression by inhibiting PGC1α recruitment.

Regulation of PXR Function by Coactivator and Corepressor Proteins: Ligand Binding Is Just the Beginning

The pregnane X receptor (PXR, NR1I2) is a nuclear receptor which exerts its regulatory function by heterodimerization with the retinoid-X-receptor α (RXRα, NR2B1) and binding to the promoter and enhancer regions of diverse target genes. PXR is involved in the regulation of drug metabolism and excretion, metabolic and immunological functions and cancer pathogenesis. PXR activity is strongly regulated by the association with coactivator and corepressor proteins. Coactivator proteins exhibit histone acetyltransferase or histone methyltransferase activity or associate with proteins having one of these activities, thus promoting chromatin decondensation and activation of the gene expression. On the contrary, corepressor proteins promote histone deacetylation and therefore favor chromatin condensation and repression of the gene expression. Several studies pointed to clear cell- and ligand-specific differences in the activation of PXR. In this article, we will review the critical role of coactivator and corepressor proteins as molecular determinants of the specificity of PXR-mediated effects. As already known for other nuclear receptors, understanding the complex mechanism of PXR activation in each cell type and under particular physiological and pathophysiological conditions may lead to the development of selective modulators with therapeutic potential.