Hypothesis-driven modeling of the human lung-ventilator system: A characterization tool for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome research

Quantifiable identification of flow-limited ventilator dyssynchrony with the deformed lung ventilator model

BACKGROUND

Ventilator dyssynchrony (VD) can worsen lung injury and is challenging to detect and quantify due to the complex variability in the dyssynchronous breaths. While machine learning (ML) approaches are useful for automating VD detection from the ventilator waveform data, scalable severity quantification and its association with pathogenesis and ventilator mechanics remain challenging.

OBJECTIVE

We develop a systematic framework to quantify pathophysiological features observed in ventilator waveform signals such that they can be used to create feature-based severity stratification of VD breaths.

METHODS

A mathematical model was developed to represent the pressure and volume waveforms of individual breaths in a feature-based parametric form. Model estimates of respiratory effort strength were used to assess the severity of flow-limited (FL)-VD breaths compared to normal breaths. A total of 93,007 breath waveforms from 13 patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

A novel model-defined continuous severity marker was developed and used to estimate breath phenotypes of FL-VD breaths. The phenotypes had a predictive accuracy of over 97% with respect to the previously developed ML-VD identification algorithm. To understand the incidence of FL-VD breaths and their association with the patient state, these phenotypes were further successfully correlated with ventilator-measured parameters and electronic health records.

CONCLUSION

This work provides a computational pipeline to identify and quantify the severity of FL-VD breaths and paves the way for a large-scale study of VD causes and effects. This approach has direct application to clinical practice and in meaningful knowledge extraction from the ventilator waveform data.

A methodology of phenotyping ICU patients from EHR data: High-fidelity, personalized, and interpretable phenotypes estimation

OBJECTIVE

Computing phenotypes that provide high-fidelity, time-dependent characterizations and yield personalized interpretations is challenging, especially given the complexity of physiological and healthcare systems and clinical data quality. This paper develops a methodological pipeline to estimate unmeasured physiological parameters and produce high-fidelity, personalized phenotypes anchored to physiological mechanics from electronic health record (EHR).

METHODS

A methodological phenotyping pipeline is developed that computes new phenotypes defined with unmeasurable computational biomarkers quantifying specific physiological properties in real time. Working within the inverse problem framework, this pipeline is applied to the glucose-insulin system for ICU patients using data assimilation to estimate an established mathematical physiological model with stochastic optimization. This produces physiological model parameter vectors of clinically unmeasured endocrine properties, here insulin secretion, clearance, and resistance, estimated for individual patient. These physiological parameter vectors are used as inputs to unsupervised machine learning methods to produce phenotypic labels and discrete physiological phenotypes. These phenotypes are inherently interpretable because they are based on parametric physiological descriptors. To establish potential clinical utility, the computed phenotypes are evaluated with external EHR data for consistency and reliability and with clinician face validation.

RESULTS

The phenotype computation was performed on a cohort of 109 ICU patients who received no or short-acting insulin therapy, rendering continuous and discrete physiological phenotypes as specific computational biomarkers of unmeasured insulin secretion, clearance, and resistance on time windows of three days. Six, six, and five discrete phenotypes were found in the first, middle, and last three-day periods of ICU stays, respectively. Computed phenotypic labels were predictive with an average accuracy of 89%. External validation of discrete phenotypes showed coherence and consistency in clinically observable differences based on laboratory measurements and ICD 9/10 codes and clinical concordance from face validity. A particularly clinically impactful parameter, insulin secretion, had a concordance accuracy of 83%±27%.

CONCLUSION

The new physiological phenotypes computed with individual patient ICU data and defined by estimates of mechanistic model parameters have high physiological fidelity, are continuous, time-specific, personalized, interpretable, and predictive. This methodology is generalizable to other clinical and physiological settings and opens the door for discovering deeper physiological information to personalize medical care.

The Development, Optimization, and Validation of Four Different Machine Learning Algorithms to Identify Ventilator Dyssynchrony

Invasive mechanical ventilation can worsen lung injury. Ventilator dyssynchrony (VD) may propagate ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) and is challenging to detect and systematically monitor because each patient takes approximately 25,000 breaths a day yet some types of VD are rare, accounting for less than 1% of all breaths. Therefore, we sought to develop and validate accurate machine learning (ML) algorithms to detect multiple types of VD by leveraging esophageal pressure waveform data to quantify patient effort with airway pressure, flow, and volume data generated during mechanical ventilation, building a computational pipeline to facilitate the study of VD.

Materials and Methods

We collected ventilator waveform and esophageal pressure data from 30 patients admitted to the ICU. Esophageal pressure allows the measurement of transpulmonary pressure and patient effort. Waveform data were cleaned, features considered essential to VD detection were calculated, and a set of 10,000 breaths were manually labeled. Four ML algorithms were trained to classify each type of VD: logistic regression, support vector classification, random forest, and XGBoost.

Results

We trained ML models to detect different families and seven types of VD with high sensitivity (>90% and >80%, respectively). Three types of VD remained difficult for ML to classify because of their rarity and lack of sample size. XGBoost classified breaths with increased specificity compared to other ML algorithms.

Discussion

We developed ML models to detect multiple types of VD accurately. The ability to accurately detect multiple VD types addresses one of the significant limitations in understanding the role of VD in affecting patient outcomes.

Conclusion

ML models identify multiple types of VD by utilizing esophageal pressure data and airway pressure, flow, and volume waveforms. The development of such computational pipelines will facilitate the identification of VD in a scalable fashion, allowing for the systematic study of VD and its impact on patient outcomes.