A comparison of acromion marker cluster calibration methods for estimating scapular kinematics during upper extremity ergometry

Repeatability of two methods for estimating scapular kinematics during dynamic functional tasks

Best practices for scapular motion tracking are still being determined. The repeatability of different scapular kinematic procedures needs to be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of two scapular kinematic procedures: double calibration with AMC (D-AMC) and individualized linear modelling (LM). Ten healthy participants had their upper body movement tracked with optical motion capture in two identical sessions. Five scapular calibration poses were performed, and seven dynamic functional tasks were tested. Scapular angles were calculated from both procedures (D-AMC vs LM). The D-AMC approach uses two poses (neutral and maximum elevation) and tracks the scapula with a rigid cluster, while the LM approach predicts scapular positioning from humeral angles based on equations built from the calibration pose data. Angle waveforms and repeatability outcomes were compared. Internal and upward rotation angle waveforms were significantly different (p < 0.05) between kinematic procedures for some tasks, with maximum mean differences up to 17.3° and 23.2°, respectively. Overall, repeatability outcomes were similar between procedures, but the LM approach was slightly better for tilt and the D-AMC approach was notably improved for upward rotation in certain tasks. For example, minimal detectable changes during the Forward Transfer ranged from 6.9° to 11.9° for the D-AMC and 8.9° to 25.3° for the LM. Discrepancies between procedures may be a function of the calibration poses chosen. Additional calibration poses may improve the comparisons between procedures.

Do Sex and Age Influence Scapular and Thoracohumeral Kinematics During a Functional Task Protocol?

There is mixed evidence on the role that biological sex plays in shoulder biomechanics despite known differences in musculoskeletal disorder prevalence between males and females. Additionally, advancing age may contribute to shoulder kinematic changes. The purpose of this study was to determine if sex and age influenced scapular and thoracohumeral kinematics during a range of functional tasks. Sixty healthy participants aged 19-63 years (30 males; 30 females) completed a functional task protocol while their upper limb motion was recorded. Scapular and humeral angles were calculated and compared with multiple linear regressions to assess the interaction effects of sex and age. Shoulder kinematics were not different between sex and age groups for many of the functional tasks. However, females had lower humeral external rotation in the overhead lift task (15°, P < .001), and less scapular anterior tilt angles in the forward transfer task (6°, P < .001) than males. Age was positively associated with humeral elevation (R2 = .330, P < .001) and scapular rotation (R2 = .299, P < .001) in the Wash Axilla task. There exist some kinematic differences between sex and with advancing age for select functional tasks, which should be considered for musculoskeletal disorder development.

Does calibration pose improve scapular kinematic repeatability in functional tasks?

Tracking scapular motion can be challenging. More research is needed to determine the best practices for scapular measurement in multi-planar tasks. The purpose of this study was to compare the repeatability of scapular kinematics during a functional task protocol calculated from different calibration procedures. It was hypothesized that select poses would improve repeatability in specific tasks. The torso, humerus, and scapula were tracked with optical motion capture in two sessions for ten pain-free participants. Scapular calibrations were completed in five poses: neutral, maximum elevation, 90° abduction, hand to contralateral shoulder, and hand to back. Each participant completed eight functional tasks (Comb Hair, Wash Axilla, Tie Apron, Overhead Reach, Side Reach, Forward Transfer, Floor Lift, Overhead Lift). Scapular angles were calculated with five different calibration procedures and extracted at 30° increments of humeral elevation in each task. Mean difference, limits of agreement, intraclass correlations, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each task and elevation level. The inclusion of different calibration poses did not markedly improve outcomes over the maximum elevation double calibration for most tasks. Using this calibration procedure, median MDCs were 10.0° for upward rotation, 13.7° for internal rotation, and 9.8° for tilt.

Defining repeatability for scapulothoracic and thoracohumeral motion during the novel work-related activities and functional task (WRAFT) protocol

Upper limb motion can be challenging to measure and analyze during work or daily life tasks. Further, humeral angle calculation method substantially influences angle outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the repeatability of scapular and humeral kinematics and compare thoracohumeral angle calculation during a work-related and functional task (WRAFT) protocol. Thirty healthy young adults completed the WRAFT protocol (Comb Hair, Wash Axilla, Tie Apron, Overhead Reach, Side Reach, Forward Transfer, Floor Lift, and Overhead Lift) on two separate occasions. Peak humeral angles and select scapular angles were extracted for each task. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), standard error of measurement, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were examined. Humeral angles were compared using the XZY and ZXY rotation sequences and "true" axial rotation for incidence of gimbal lock and amplitude coherence. Results showed that for scapular kinematics, elevation-based WRAFTs produced overall better ICC scores (0.23-0.90) compared to those tasks primarily driven by lateral humeral motion (0.02-0.84). MDCs ranged from 7°-78°, suggesting some tasks demonstrated good repeatability (Comb Hair, Overhead Reach, Floor Lift), while others had very high variability (Side Reach, Tie Apron). Amplitude coherence for thoracohumeral angles was best for ZXY for all tasks except the Comb Hair and Tie Apron, for which XZY is recommended. "True" axial rotation demonstrated good coherence for all but Tie Apron. The WRAFT protocol may be used for functionally relevant scapular and humeral kinematic assessment for select task and posture combinations.

Comparison of scapular kinematics from optical motion capture and inertial measurement units during a work-related and functional task protocol

Understanding scapular motion during everyday tasks is essential for adequate return-to-work and intervention programming, yet most scapular assessments involve restricted motion analysis within a laboratory setting. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been used to track scapular motion, but their validity compared to "gold standard" optical motion capture is not well defined. Further, it is unclear how different IMU sensor placements could affect scapular kinematic outcomes during a functional task protocol. To assess the reliability of scapular motion measurements with the use of the "gold standard" optical motion capture and IMUs, and to compare scapular IMU placement to assess which location (acromion or spine) was best for reliability of scapular motion, participants completed two testing sessions. During each lab visit, participant torso, humeri, and scapulae motion was tracked during 3 trials of 8 dynamic tasks and two elevation movements. Scapular angles were extracted during each task. To assess intra-session reliability, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), and root mean square errors (RMSEs) were calculated. Results showed ICCs and RMSEs were acceptable. Although there appeared offsets between the two motion capture system scapular kinematics outcomes based on the plotted waveforms, the movement patterns appeared consistent between both motion capture methods. Data also showed that acromion IMU placement produced slightly more reliable outcomes than placement on the spine. Two placements of scapular tracking IMUs were tested with identical procedures.

Biomechanical Analysis of the Throwing Athlete and Its Impact on Return to Sport

Throwing sports remain a popular pastime and frequent source of musculoskeletal injuries, particularly those involving the shoulder and elbow. Biomechanical analyses of throwing athletes have identified pathomechanic factors that predispose throwers to injury or poor performance. These factors, or key performance indicators, are an ongoing topic of research, with the goals of improved injury prediction, prevention, and rehabilitation. Important key performance indicators in the literature to date include shoulder and elbow torque, shoulder rotation, kinetic chain function (as measured by trunk rotation timing and hip-shoulder separation), and lower-extremity mechanics (including stride characteristics). The current gold standard for biomechanical analysis of the throwing athlete involves marker-based 3-dimensional) video motion capture. Emerging technologies such as marker-less motion capture, wearable technology, and machine learning have the potential to further refine our understanding. This review will discuss the biomechanics of throwing, with particular attention to baseball pitching, while also delineating methods of modern throwing analysis, implications for clinical orthopaedic practice, and future areas of research interest.

Level of Evidence

V, expert opinion.

An individualized linear model approach for estimating scapular kinematics during baseball pitching

Assessment of scapulothoracic and glenohumeral contributions to shoulder function during baseball pitching are limited by challenges in accurately measuring dynamic scapular orientation. A recently validated individualized linear model approach that estimates scapular orientation based on measurable humerothoracic orientation has yet to be adapted for pitching and may improve upon currently recommended methods such as the acromion marker cluster (AMC). This study evaluates the ability of a pitching-specific individualized linear model to estimate scapular orientation in static positions throughout a throwing motion by comparing against palpation and an AMC. Individualized linear models were created for 14 collegiate pitchers by determining scapulothoracic and humerothoracic orientations at static arm postures throughout their individual dynamic throwing motions. Linear model and AMC estimates were compared against palpation at intermediate test positions within the throwing motion that were excluded from model creation. Linear model estimates were similar to palpation at all test positions and on all scapulothoracic axes while AMC estimates differed on internal/external rotation and anterior/posterior tilt during cocking (p = 0.001, p = 0.018) and follow-through (p = 0.003, p = 0.006). Linear model root mean square error (RMSE) values were smaller than AMC values for all positions/axes. Linear model RMSE values (2.8-6.3°) were within a range of published values previously deemed acceptable, while AMC values (5.1-15.8°) went beyond this range. The linear model approach accurately estimates static scapular orientation throughout a pitching motion and improves upon current methods. Future applications to dynamic pitching may facilitate understanding of how scapulothoracic and glenohumeral joint function relate to injury risks, rehabilitation, and performance.

Reliability and Validity of an Acromion Marker Cluster for Recording Scapula Posture at End Range Clavicle Protraction, Retraction, Elevation, and Depression

Acromion marker cluster (AMC) methods have been shown to accurately track scapula motion during humeral elevation below 90°, however, their accuracy has not been assessed in shoulder girdle motion such as clavicle protraction, retraction, elevation, and depression independent of humeral movement. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the AMC method to record scapula orientation at end range clavicle protraction, retraction, elevation, and depression. The right scapulae of 22 female and 20 male asymptomatic volunteers were assessed with an AMC and scapula locator (SL) method during end range clavicle protraction, retraction, elevation, and depression (without humeral elevation) using an 8-camera 3D movement registration system. Measurements recorded from the AMC and SL measures showed fair to excellent agreement (ICC 0.4–0.92). While the AMC method overestimated and underestimated scapular motion in some planes compared to the SL, root mean square error between methods were low for scapular internal/external rotation (2.3–3.7°), upward/downward rotation (4.5–6.6°), and anterior/posterior tilt (3.2–5.1°), across all conditions. The AMC method was shown to be a reliable and valid measurement of scapula orientation at end range clavicle movements independent of humeral movement.