Does calibration pose improve scapular kinematic repeatability in functional tasks?

Tracking scapular motion can be challenging. More research is needed to determine the best practices for scapular measurement in multi-planar tasks. The purpose of this study was to compare the repeatability of scapular kinematics during a functional task protocol calculated from different calibration procedures. It was hypothesized that select poses would improve repeatability in specific tasks. The torso, humerus, and scapula were tracked with optical motion capture in two sessions for ten pain-free participants. Scapular calibrations were completed in five poses: neutral, maximum elevation, 90° abduction, hand to contralateral shoulder, and hand to back. Each participant completed eight functional tasks (Comb Hair, Wash Axilla, Tie Apron, Overhead Reach, Side Reach, Forward Transfer, Floor Lift, Overhead Lift). Scapular angles were calculated with five different calibration procedures and extracted at 30° increments of humeral elevation in each task. Mean difference, limits of agreement, intraclass correlations, and minimal detectable change (MDC) were calculated for each task and elevation level. The inclusion of different calibration poses did not markedly improve outcomes over the maximum elevation double calibration for most tasks. Using this calibration procedure, median MDCs were 10.0° for upward rotation, 13.7° for internal rotation, and 9.8° for tilt.

[Study on the hydrodynamic mechanisms of the radial arterial blood pressure variation in response to arm elevation]

Objective: To analyze the mechanism of invasive blood pressure change in radial artery caused by arm elevation by observing pressure, velocity and diameter of radial artery. Methods: Twenty-six hemodynamically stable hepatobiliary surgery patients admitted to the intensive care unit from June to December 2018 after general anesthesia in Tsinghua Changgung Hospital were selected. When the arm was raised, the invasive blood pressure was recorded, and the inner diameter and blood flow velocity of the radial artery were measured by Doppler ultrasound. The data following a normal distribution were compared with paired t test. Results: After arm elevation for 30 s, systolic blood pressure of radial artery decreased and diastolic blood pressure increased significantly((107±16) mmHg vs (120±17) mmHg, (75±6) mmHg vs (71±9) mmHg, t=25.0, -12.6, both P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in mean arterial pressure ((87±10) mmHg vs (87±11) mmHg, t=1.1, P>0.05). The peak velocity, end-diastolic velocity and resistance index of the radial artery increased significantly, and the transverse and longitudinal inner diameters of the radial artery decreased significantly after the arm was elevated for 30 s (t=-63.4, -14.6, -22.5, 31.4, 25.3, all P<0.01). Conclusions: Kinetic pressure compensation and vascular resistance compensation may be the main mechanism of radial artery pressure change when the arm is elevated. Arm elevation can be used as a vascular resistance response test clinically.

Work above shoulder level and shoulder complaints: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association and the exposure-response relationship between work above shoulder height and shoulder pain or disorders.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in Medline, Embase, and Health and Safety Science Abstracts. Included were articles with prospective cohort, case-control, cross-sectional, or intervention study designs. Quality assessment was based on an evaluation scheme adjusted to study design and normalized to 100%. The cut-off for sufficient quality to include articles was above 40% and cut-off for high-quality articles was above 50% of maximal score. The level of strength of evidence for an association between exposure and effect was assessed according to the GRADE guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty-four articles were included. Articles that document large effects (higher risk estimates; OR ≥ 2) have higher quality score, include analyses of severe arm elevation, more often use clinical outcome, and report an exposure-response relationship compared to studies reporting lower risk estimates. The studies that reported large effects were all significant. An exposure-response relationship was found in many high-quality studies when relating exposure intensity of arm elevation (level of arm elevation, amplitude) as well as duration of arm elevation, especially > 90°.

CONCLUSION

We conclude on a limited evidence for an association between arm elevation at work and shoulder disorders. Severe arm elevation with elbows above shoulder level (i.e., > 90°) shows a moderate evidence for an association with shoulder disorders.

Arm posture influences on regional supraspinatus and infraspinatus activation in isometric arm elevation efforts

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of arm posture on activation of the anterior and posterior regions of supraspinatus and the superior and middle regions of infraspinatus during resisted isometric arm elevations. Thirty-one healthy participants performed 18 isometric resistance exertions against a force cube in three elevation planes (flexion, scaption, abduction) and three elevation angles (30°, 90°, 150°) in maximal and sub-maximal resistance conditions. EMG data were obtained using four pairs of fine wire electrodes. The mean activation of each region and the activation ratios were compared across postures using ANOVAs. Supraspinatus anterior was significantly more active during abduction and scaption, and in higher elevation angles, while the posterior region showed similar activation levels across postures. Infraspinatus regions were more active during flexion with more relative activation of the infraspinatus superior at 90° flexion. The results suggest that regional activation of supraspinatus and infraspinatus should be considered for assessment and rehabilitation purposes. In any clinical setting where it is important to reduce the stress on the supraspinatus anterior, isometric flexion exercises performed with arm in low elevation angles could provide the opportunity to strengthen the posterior region of supraspinatus with limited stress on the anterior region. Beside external rotation exertions, resisted flexion tests may be useful for evaluation of infraspinatus regions.

Self-recordings of upper arm elevation during cleaning - comparison between analyses using a simplified reference posture and a standard reference posture

BACKGROUND

To reduce ergonomic risk factors in terms of awkward and constrained postures and high velocities, it is important to perform adequate risk assessments. Technical methods provide objective measures of physical workload. These methods have so far mainly been used by researchers. However, if written instructions how to apply the sensors and how to adopt the reference posture are provided, together with triaxial accelerometers, it may be possible for employees to record their own physical workload. The exposure in terms of e.g. upper arm elevations could then easily be assessed for all workers in a workplace. The main aims of this study were: 1) to compare analyses for self-recording of upper arm elevation during work using a simplified reference posture versus using a standard reference posture, and 2) to compare the two reference postures.

METHODS

Twenty-eight cleaners attached an accelerometer to their dominant upper arm and adopted a simplified reference according to a written instruction. They were thereafter instructed by a researcher to adopt a standard reference. Upper arm elevations were recorded for 2 or 3 days. Each recording was analysed twice; relative to the simplified reference posture and relative to the standard reference posture. The group means of the differences in recorded upper arm elevations between simplified and standard reference analyses were assessed using Wilcoxon signed ranks test. Furthermore, we calculated the group mean of the differences between the simplified reference posture and the standard reference posture.

RESULTS

For arm elevation during work (50th percentile), the group mean of the differences between the two analyses was 0.2° (range -7 - 10°). The group mean of the differences between the two references was 9° (range 1 - 21°). The subjects were able to follow the instructions in the protocol and performed self-recording of upper arm elevation and velocity.

CONCLUSIONS

The small difference between the two analyses indicates that recordings performed by employees themselves are comparable, on a group level, with those performed by researchers. Self-recordings in combination with action levels would provide employers with a method for risk assessment as a solid basis for prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

The Role of Bolus Injection of Saline with Arm Elevation on Rocuronium onset Time: A Randomized Control Study

Background:

The onset time of neuromuscular blockade is a crucial time associated with the risk of hypoxia and pulmonary aspiration. Various strategies have been undertaken to shorten this onset time. Therefore, we investigated the effects of bolus of 20 ml saline followed by limb elevation after administration of rocuronium in a dose of 0.6 mg/kg to study the onset time.

Methodology:

Thirty patients were randomly allocated to the bolus saline group or control group. General anesthesia was induced and maintained with fentanyl and propofol. Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg intravenous (IV) was administered followed by 20 ml saline bolus and limb elevation in the study group compared to administration of 0.6 mg/kg in a running drip only in the control. Onset of neuromuscular block was assessed by acceleromyography at the adductor pollicis muscle with train-of-four stimulation.

Results:

The lag time was shorter in bolus group (34 s median) than in control group (45 s median), P < 0.017. The onset time was shorter in bolus group (55 s median) than in control group (110 s median), P < 0.001. The T1 recovery to 25% was longer in bolus group (42 min median) than in control group (39 min median) which was statistically not significant.

Conclusion:

Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg IV followed by bolus 20 ml saline and concomitant limb elevation resulted in shorter lag time, faster onset of neuromuscular blockade, good intubating conditions without prolonging clinical duration of action when compared to the control.

Diaphragm height varies with arm position: comparison between angiography and CT

PURPOSE

To investigate how elevation of the arms affects diaphragm height.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed angiography and computed tomography (CT) portography data from 44 patients who were treated for hepatocellular carcinoma at our institution from July 2013 to May 2014. Diaphragm height was determined independently by two radiologists as the distance from the upper edge of the first lumbar vertebra to the highest point of the right diaphragm. The differences in height between angiography and CT images were compared using a paired t-test. We also evaluated the influence of table height and distance between X-ray tube and flat panel detector [source-image distance (SID)] on a phantom model.

RESULTS

Diaphragm height was higher on CT images [mean ± standard deviation (SD), 113.2 ± 27.2 mm] than on angiography images (105.5 ± 27.8 mm; P < 0.001). Inter-rater correlation was excellent both in angiography (R = 0.920; P < 0.001) and CT (R = 0.950; P < 0.001) measurements. Table height and SID had no influence on diaphragm height measurements (P = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

The diaphragm elevation was observed on CT with arm elevation compared with angiography without arm elevation.