Study of intraarticular pressures in the elbow joints

The loads developed by epicondylar and epitrochlear muscles across the elbow joint. A dynamic simulated model

The radio-humeral joint has traditionally been believed to support most of the loads transmitted through the elbow. Load transfer through the elbow has been a controversial issue since the publication of the first biomechanical studies on the subject, most of which were based on extrinsic forces acting on the extended joint. The present study analyzes load distribution across the six different compartments in the elbow while the joint is flexed, as well as the intrinsic forces generated in the epicondylar and epitrochlear muscles. Ten cadaveric elbows were positioned at 90° of flexion, forearm in a neutral position and wrist at 0°. Tekscan sensors were used for measuring intraarticular pressures. Forces generated by epitrochlear muscles results in a series of loads that affect mainly the anteromedial facet (40%), followed by the posterolateral facet (34%) of the ulnohumeral joint, with the flexor carpi ulnaris generating the heaviest loads (43% on the anteromedial and 38% on the posterolateral facets). Conversely, the forces generated by the epicondylar muscles, similar in behavior but with an opposite direction, convey heavier loads to the elbow's anterolateral facet (45%), followed by the radiohumeral joint (26%) with the extensor carpi ulnaris generating the heaviest loads (54% on the anterolateral facet and 17% on the radiohumeral joint). Our results indicate that the elbow joint exhibits a characteristic load distribution pattern that depends on the muscles, as intrinsic forces are generated by the epicondylar and epitrochlear muscles. The anterior portion of the ulnohumeral joint is the area bearing the heaviest loads.

The effect of hemiarthroplasty implant modulus on contact mechanics: an experimental investigation

BACKGROUND

Hemiarthroplasties cause damage to the cartilage that they articulate against, which is a major limitation to their use. This study investigated the use of lower-stiffness materials to determine whether they improve hemiarthroplasty contact mechanics and thus reduce the risk of cartilage damage.

METHODS

Eleven fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities were disarticulated and fixed in a custom-built jig that applied a static load of 50 N to the radiocapitellar joint. Flexion angles of 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° were tested with radial head implants made of cobalt-chrome (CoCr) and ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) compared with the native radial head. A Tekscan thin-film sensor was used to measure the contact area and contact pressure between the radius and capitellum.

RESULTS

UHMWPE and CoCr were too stiff in the application of hemiarthroplasty, resulting in lower contact areas and higher contact pressures relative to the native joint. The native contact area was, on average, 42 ± 20 mm² larger than that of UHMWPE (P < .001) and 55 ± 24 mm² larger than that of CoCr (P < .001). UHMWPE had a contact area 13 ± 10 mm² greater than that of CoCr (P = .014).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

This study shows that even though UHMWPE has a stiffness several times lower than CoCr, the use of this material in hemiarthroplasty led to only a minor improvement in contact mechanics. Neither implant restored contact similar to the native articulation. Investigations into new materials to improve the contact mechanics of hemiarthroplasty should focus on materials with a lower stiffness than UHMWPE.

Shortening effect influence of Distal Minimally Invasive Metatarsal Osteotomy in primary metatarsalgia

PURPOSE

In primary metatarsalgia, Distal Minimally invasive Metatarsal Osteotomy (DMMO) achieves a correct load distribution which is a factor in pain relief, but contrary to the elevation of the metatarsal head, shortening the metatarsal length has no influence on plantar-loading parameters, while the increased metatarsal length is a factor in the development of metatarsalgia. Thus, we hypothesized that metatarsalgia could be partly related to a functional imbalance between bone structure and soft tissues and pain relief after DMMO results from soft tissue relaxation.

METHODS

Many authors have highlighted the correlation between joint pressure and periarticular soft tissue tension. To test our hypothesis, we measured intra-operatively the MTPJ pressure of 19 patients suffering from primary metatarsalgia, before and after DMMO. This pressure is being analyzed as a reflection of joint decompression and forefoot soft tissue release. Many authors have highlighted the correlation between joint pressure and periarticular soft tissue tension.

RESULTS

Lower metatarsals presenting metatarsalgia show a significantly lower MTPJ pressure compared to asymptomatic rays, and DMMO induces a significant increase of MTPJ pressure.

CONCLUSION

Those variations reflect the functional imbalance between bone structure and soft tissue in primary metatarsalgia. The biomechanical rationale of the shortening effect of DMMO could therefore be explained by the release of forefoot soft tissue, which could take part in the pain relief by restoring this balance.