Shortening effect influence of Distal Minimally Invasive Metatarsal Osteotomy in primary metatarsalgia

PURPOSE

In primary metatarsalgia, Distal Minimally invasive Metatarsal Osteotomy (DMMO) achieves a correct load distribution which is a factor in pain relief, but contrary to the elevation of the metatarsal head, shortening the metatarsal length has no influence on plantar-loading parameters, while the increased metatarsal length is a factor in the development of metatarsalgia. Thus, we hypothesized that metatarsalgia could be partly related to a functional imbalance between bone structure and soft tissues and pain relief after DMMO results from soft tissue relaxation.

METHODS

Many authors have highlighted the correlation between joint pressure and periarticular soft tissue tension. To test our hypothesis, we measured intra-operatively the MTPJ pressure of 19 patients suffering from primary metatarsalgia, before and after DMMO. This pressure is being analyzed as a reflection of joint decompression and forefoot soft tissue release. Many authors have highlighted the correlation between joint pressure and periarticular soft tissue tension.

RESULTS

Lower metatarsals presenting metatarsalgia show a significantly lower MTPJ pressure compared to asymptomatic rays, and DMMO induces a significant increase of MTPJ pressure.

CONCLUSION

Those variations reflect the functional imbalance between bone structure and soft tissue in primary metatarsalgia. The biomechanical rationale of the shortening effect of DMMO could therefore be explained by the release of forefoot soft tissue, which could take part in the pain relief by restoring this balance.

Are postoperative standing radiographs relevant before hospital discharge in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

PURPOSE

Postoperative standing radiographs are usually performed before hospital discharge after AIS fusion. However, patients are often still painful and have not recovered yet their physiological balance. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the relevance of such early radiographs and more specifically investigate whether postoperative alignment could be analyzed.

METHODS

All consecutive AIS patients operated between January 2015 and December 2015 were included. All patients underwent biplanar stereoradiographs before hospital discharge, at 4 months postoperative and at last follow-up. Fifteen parameters (eight coronal and seven sagittal), reflecting correction and spinal alignment were measured and compared. The incidence of implant misplacement, requiring or not surgical revision, was recorded.

RESULTS

In total, 100 patients were included. A significant difference was found for 12 out of the 15 (80%) parameters between the first erect radiograph and the 4-month follow-up visit, including the CVA and the SVA, which are commonly used to assess postoperative alignment. Clavicle, UIV and LIV tilts also decreased significantly at 4 months postoperative. In opposition, no significant change occurred for the same parameters between the 4-month visit and latest follow-up. In nine patients, a pedicle screw was considered misplaced on the first radiograph, but all patients remained asymptomatic and no revision was performed.

CONCLUSION

There is no need for additional immediate postoperative radiographs in AIS, if an intraoperative radiograph has already been taken. This finding could help reducing radiation exposure in immature patients and should be further studied in other etiologies. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.