Contributing factors to the initial femoral stem migration in cementless total hip arthroplasty of postmenopausal women

Functional assessment in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty

Aims

Conventional patient-reported surveys, used for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA), are limited by subjectivity and recall bias. Objective functional evaluation, such as gait analysis, to delineate a patient's functional capacity and customize surgical interventions, may address these shortcomings. This systematic review endeavours to investigate the application of objective functional assessments in appraising individuals undergoing THA.

Methods

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied. Eligible studies of THA patients that conducted at least one type of objective functional assessment both pre- and postoperatively were identified through Embase, Medline/PubMed, and Cochrane Central database-searching from inception to 15 September 2023. The assessments included were subgrouped for analysis: gait analysis, motion analysis, wearables, and strength tests.

Results

A total of 130 studies using 15 distinct objective functional assessment methods (FAMs) were identified. The most frequently used method was instrumented gait/motion analysis, followed by the Timed-Up-and-Go test (TUG), 6 minute walk test, timed stair climbing test, and various strength tests. These assessments were characterized by their diagnostic precision and applicability to daily activities. Wearables were frequently used, offering cost-effectiveness and remote monitoring benefits. However, their accuracy and potential discomfort for patients must be considered.

Conclusion

The integration of objective functional assessments in THA presents promise as a progress-tracking modality for improving patient outcomes. Gait analysis and the TUG, along with advancing wearable sensor technology, have the potential to enhance patient care, surgical planning, and rehabilitation.

Demographic characteristics influencing the stem subsidence in total hip arthroplasty: an imaging study

INTRODUCTION

The present study evaluated whether patient demographic characteristics influence the subsidence of the stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The following characteristics were evaluated: age, height, weight, and sex. The association between the time elapsed from the THA implantation and the amount of stem subsidence was also investigated.

METHODS

The records of patients who underwent THA in the period between 2016 and 2023 were accessed. All patients underwent two-staged bilateral THA using cementless DePuy collarless Corail (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA) stems. The following parameters were measured and compared to assess stem subsidence: distance from the proximal femur at the stem bone interface and the medial apex of the regular triangle built within the trochanter minor (point A); distance from the medial apex of the regular triangle built within the trochanter minor and the distal portion of the femoral stem (point B).

RESULTS

Overall, 294 patients were included. 62% (182 of 294 patients) were women. 45% (134 of 296 THAs) were on the right side. The mean age was 64.9 ± 10.4 years. The mean BMI was 28.3 ± 5.1 kg/m2. The mean length of the follow-up was 14.4 ± 11.0 months. The mean subsidence in point A was 2.1 mm (P < 0.0001), and that in point B was 3.1 mm (P < 0.0001). There was evidence of a weak positive association between patient weight (P < 0.0001), age (P = 0.03), follow-up (P = 0.002) and the amount of stem subsidence. Patient height did not demonstrate any association with the amount of stem subsidence (P = 0.07). There was no difference in stem subsidence between women and men (P = 0.9).

CONCLUSION

Stem subsidence in THA using cementless DePuy collarless Corail implants is approximately 2.6 mm after 14.4 months. Greater patient weight, age, and longer time elapsed from THA implantation were associated with greater stem subsidence. Patient height and sex did not demonstrate any influence on the amount of stem subsidence. These results must be considered in light of the limitations of the present study.

Influence of bone mineral density on femoral stem subsidence after cementless THA

INTRODUCTION

Femoral stem subsidence can lead to aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Low bone mineral density (BMD) is a risk factor for stem subsidence as it can affect the initial stability and osteointegration. We evaluated whether reduced bone mineral density is related to higher subsidence of the femoral stem after primary cementless THA with enhanced recovery rehabilitation.

METHODS

79 patients who had undergone primary cementless THA with enhanced recovery rehabilitation were analyzed retrospectively. Subsidence of the femoral stem was measured on standing pelvic anterior-posterior radiographs after 4-6 weeks and one year. Patient individual risk factors for stem subsidence (stem size, canal flare index, canal fill ratio, body mass index (BMI), demographic data) were correlated. Dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans were performed of the formal neck and the lumbar spine including the calculation of T-score and Z-score. Patient-reported outcome measures were evaluated 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Stem subsidence appeared regardless of BMD (overall collective 2.3 ± 1.64 mm). Measure of subsidence was even higher in patients with normal BMD (2.8 ± 1.7 mm vs. 2.0 ± 1.5 mm, p = 0.05). High BMI was correlated with increased stem subsidence (p = 0.015). Subsidence had no impact on improvement of patient-related outcome measures (WOMAC, EQ-5D-5L and EQ-VAS) after THA. Patients with low BMD reported lower quality of life 12 month postoperatively compared to patients with normal BMD (EQ-5D-5L 0.82 vs. 0.91, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Stable fixation of a cementless stem succeeds also in patients with reduced BMD. Regarding stem subsidence, enhanced recovery rehabilitation can be safely applied in patients with low BMD.

Mid-Term Migration Behavior of an Uncemented Proximally Anchored Straight Stem-A Retrospective EBRA Migration Analysis

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening is one of the most-common causes of the failure of cementless stems. Einzel Bild Röntgen Analyse-Femoral Component Analysis (EBRA-FCA) allows the diagnosis of stem migration, which can be considered a factor in predicting implant survival. The current study aimed to present the migration behavior of a tapered proximally anchored straight stem.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed all consecutive patients who received a cementless CBC straight stem (Mathys AG, Bettlach, Switzerland) between 2005 and 2019. We analyzed the migration pattern using the EBRA-FCA software and reviewed their medical histories. In addition, periprosthetic radiolucency was rated according to the Gruen zones and femoral configuration according to Dorr.

RESULTS

A total of 333 stems in 332 patients (female 191; male 141) met our inclusion criteria. The mean age at surgery was 63 (range 21-87) years. Migration analysis by EBRA-FCA showed a mean subsidence of 1.6 mm at final follow-up at 96 months with a maximum noted mean subsidence of 2.0 mm at 72 and 84 months. Dorr Type A showed a tendency of less subsidence than did Dorr Type B and was statistically significant at 6 (p = 0.0396) and 72 months (p = 0.0127). The body mass index (BMI) and increased subsidence were not found to correlate (p > 0.05). For this cohort, the overall femoral revision-free rate was 95.2% and the revision-free rate for aseptic loosening was 99.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The results showed migration behavior in cementless stems with initial increased migration and subsequent secondary stabilization, suggesting an excellent long-term outcome. Stem migration of this tapered proximally anchored stem might be lower in Dorr Type A than in Dorr Type B femurs without being statistically significant at all time points.

How Do Classic (Static) RSA and Patient Motion Artifacts Affect the Assessment of Migration of a TKA Tibial Component? An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND

Classic (static) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) is the current gold standard to assess, in vivo, the migration of total joint arthroplasty components. To prevent potential patient motion artifacts during the acquisition of paired radiostereometric images, images must be taken by simultaneously firing both X-ray tubes. However, the influence of nonsynchronized RSA paired images or patient motion artifacts on the precision of RSA and the assessment of implant migration is not well understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We assessed (1) the effect of possible patient motion on the precision of RSA and (2) apparent differences in implant migration among axes (in-plane and out-of-plane translations and in-plane and out-of-plane rotations) of possible motion artifacts.

METHODS

Radiographs of two tibial knee arthroplasty components, each fixed in two bone-implant models as a customized phantom, were taken in a uniplanar measurement setup. We evaluated both model-based (implant models from reversed engineering) and marker-based (additional attached implant markers) RSA approaches. Between the simulated reference and follow-up examinations, we used one of the bone-implant models to simulate patient motion and the other to simulate no patient motion in parallel. Two defined protocols were followed for each of the bone-implant models: no-motion and simulated motion protocols. RSA image pairs were analyzed using a model-based RSA software package (MBRSA 4.1, RSA core ). Precision was calculated through repeat examinations, and migration of the two components was assessed for comparison of the components with each other. Measurements were taken along the medial-lateral and posterior-anterior axes for translations and around the cranial-caudal axis for rotations. The maximum total point motion was measured for comparison between the two components.

RESULTS

The effect of simulated patient motion was generally small, except in the cranial-caudal axis, but the induced imprecision associated with motion was larger in model-based RSA than it was in marker-based RSA. The mean ± standard deviation values of precision in model-based RSA were 0.035 ± 0.015 mm, 0.045 ± 0.014 mm, and 0.049 ± 0.036 mm greater than those in marker-based RSA, in accordance with the simulated motion protocol in translations along the medial-lateral axis (0.018 ± 0.004 mm; p = 0.01), along the posterior-anterior axis (0.018 ± 0.007 mm; p = 0.003), and rotations around the cranial-caudal axis (0.017 ± 0.006 mm; p = 0.02). Apparent differences in implant migration were the greatest for the maximum total point motion. The maximum total point motion increased from 0.038 ± 0.007 mm for the no-motion protocol to 1.684 ± 0.038 mm (p < 0.001) for the simulated motion protocol in marker-based RSA, and from 0.101 ± 0.027 mm for the no-motion protocol to 1.973 ± 0.442 mm (p < 0.001) for the simulated motion protocol in model-based RSA, and was the worst-case scenario regarding patient motion artifacts.

CONCLUSION

Patient motion exceeding 1 mm or 1° on nonsynchronized RSA images affects measurement errors regarding the detection of migration of a tibial component. In clinical RSA studies, the effect of patient motion on the assessment of implant migration should be of particular concern, even if clinical RSA systems have acceptable precision. Specially trained radiographers are crucial for correctly acquiring radiographs, especially when simultaneous radiography exposures are not electronically automated. In general, RSA requires synchronized image acquisition, and this should be the state-of-the-art.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In clinical RSA studies, precision assessed by repeat examinations may not be reliable using the current standards that are widely used in radiology departments. When assessing implant migration for reliability, comparison of the maximum total point motion between the tested (simulated motion) implant and baseline (no-motion) implant, as in this study, is advocated because of the accurate detection of patient motion artifacts.

Patient-specific three-dimensional evaluation of interface micromotion in two different short stem designs in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a finite element analysis

Background

Evaluation of micromotion in various activities in daily life is essential to the assessment of the initial fixation of cementless short stems in total hip arthroplasty. This study sought to evaluate three-dimensionally the micromotion of two types of cementless short stems.

Methods

Two types of stems were used: the Fitmore stem with a rectangular cross-section (rectangular stem) and the octagonal-oval GTS stem with fins (finned stem). Finite element analysis was used to calculate the micromotion of two activities that place a heavy load on the stem (single-leg stance and stair climbing). Three values were measured: the magnitude of micromotion (mean and 95th percentile), the location of micromotion above the 95th percentile value, and the directions of the micromotion vector.

Results

1. There was no significant difference in the magnitude of the micromotion between the rectangular stem and finned stem groups for single-leg stance or stair climbing. 2. In both groups, the micromotion was greatest at the proximal and distal ends. 3. The direction of the micromotion was similar in both groups; internal rotation occurred from the distal to the middle of the stem during stair climbing.

Conclusions

The rectangular stem had comparable initial fixation to that of the finned stem. In both models, the micromotion was greater at the proximal and distal ends. The direction of the micromotion was not dependent on the stem shape but on the direction of the load on the artificial femoral head. These results will be important for stem selection and future stem development.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-022-03329-5.

Denosumab in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: Multivariate Reanalysis of 3D Femoral Stem Migration and the Influence on Outliers

In cementless total hip arthroplasty, adequate implant stability is necessary for the success of osseointegration and rapid clinical recovery. Postoperative femoral stem migration, measured by radiostereometric analysis (RSA), defines the initial stability achieved during surgical implantation. In a recent trial of 65 postmenopausal women randomized 1:1 denosumab:placebo, denosumab failed to reduce the initial migration of a cementless femoral stem despite the successful prevention of periprosthetic bone loss. The trial applied the current RSA standard, which examined stem migration on an axis‐by‐axis basis and did not consider more complex three‐dimensional (3D) migration. Therefore, we performed a reanalysis of the trial data using a multivariate hierarchical linear mixed model (LMM). As an additional limitation, the data included influential outliers. Women with normal bone mineral density exhibited significantly (p = 0.036) less stem subsidence compared with osteopenic and osteoporotic women. Denosumab significantly decreased the variance of stem migration in osteopenic and osteoporotic women. The mean magnitude of 3D stem migration did not differ between denosumab‐treated and placebo‐treated women (p = 0.820). After application of a common statistical definition for RSA outlier identification, there were eight (12%) outliers, six in the placebo group and two in the denosumab group (p = 0.149). After exclusion of the outliers, the repeated LMM analysis demonstrated a trending difference in 3D stem migration (p = 0.086), with a significant difference of z‐axis rotation (valgus‐varus tilt) of the femoral stem (p = 0.029). The observed effect size was small and without clinically important differences in postoperative recovery. Based on a Monte Carlo simulation with random‐generated 3D migration data, multivariate LMM showed greater statistical power than univariate analyses. The application of hierarchical LMM facilitated the analysis of implant migration as a factual 3D event. The observed trend in the lower number of RSA outliers in denosumab‐treated subjects warrants powered large‐scale trials. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Pneumatic femoral broaching decreases post-operative subsidence of a cementless taper-wedge stem

PURPOSE

Stem subsidence is a known cause of early failure in cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of pneumatic femoral broaching in preventing post-operative subsidence of a proximally porous-coated, taper-wedge stem.

METHODS

We reviewed 169 cases of primary THA with a single taper-wedge stem. Eighty THAs performed using pneumatic broaching were compared with 89 THAs performed using manual broaching in terms of postoperative canal fill ratio (CFR) at three levels, stem subsidence at one year post-operation, and stem fixation at latest follow-up (median, 24 months).

RESULTS

The median CFRs were higher in the pneumatic group than in the manual group at all levels (p < 0.05). The median stem subsidence at one year after THA was lower in the pneumatic group than in the manual group (0.2 mm vs. 0.6 mm, p = 0.007). A multivariate analysis determined a decreased CFR at 60 mm below the lesser trochanter and the manual broaching as independent factors affecting post-operative stem subsidence. At the latest follow-up, all stems showed stable fixation by bone ingrowth in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that the pneumatic broaching device was useful in maximizing the mediolateral canal filling and initial stability and minimizing the subsidence of taper-wedge stems.

Initial femoral stem position in cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in elderly patients is associated with early implant subsidence: A radiographic analysis

BACKGROUND

Bipolar hemiarthroplasty is a well-established treatment for displaced femoral neck fracture in elderly patients. Implant subsidence is a potential complication with cementless femoral stems, and smaller canal fill ratio has been reported as a radiographic risk factor. We aimed to determine the risk factors for subsidence, particularly the initial implant position relative to the resected medial calcar of proximal femur.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasties performed using a single proximally hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem in patients with a minimum radiographic follow-up of 12 weeks between January 2017 and December 2018. The amount of subsidence (significant subsidence defined as ≥ 5 mm), canal fill ratio, and implant position relative to the point of resected medial calcar (position A: medial and superior to calcar; position B: lateral and superior to calcar; position C: lateral and inferior to calcar) were measured and analyzed.

RESULTS

One-hundred eighty patients were identified (mean age: 80.9 years). Significant subsidence was observed in 52 patients (28.9%). On multivariate analysis, older age, lower canal fill ratio, implant position B, C, and less medial overhang of stem were independent risk factors for early implant subsidence. The risk ratio of position B and C to position A was 5.13 (95% confidence interval, 2.23-11.80).

CONCLUSION

In our analysis, older age and lower canal fill ratio were associated with increased risk of subsidence, whereas implant with position A and more medial overhang were less prone to subsidence with the tapered proximally hydroxyapatite-coated implant.