Acetaminophen as symptomatic treatment of pain from osteoarthritis

Impact of medication on protein and amino acid metabolism in the elderly: the sulfur amino acid and paracetamol case

The optimisation of nutritional support for the growing number of older individuals does not usually take into account medication. Paracetamol (acetaminophen; APAP) is the first intention treatment of chronic pain that is highly prevalent and persistent in the elderly. Detoxification of APAP occurs in the liver and utilises sulfate and glutathione (GSH), both of which are issued from cysteine (Cys), a conditionally indispensable amino acid. The detoxification-induced siphoning of Cys could reduce the availability of Cys for skeletal muscle. Consequently, APAP could worsen sarcopenia, an important component of the frailty syndrome leading to dependency. The present review provides the rationale for the potential pro-sarcopenic effect of APAP then recent results concerning the effect of chronic APAP treatment on muscle mass and metabolism are discussed. The principal findings are that chronic treatments with doses of APAP comparable with the maximum posology for humans can increase the requirement for sulfur amino acids (SAA), reduce Cys availability for muscle, reduce muscle protein synthesis and aggravate sarcopenia in animals. One clinical study is in favour of an enhanced SAA requirement in the older individual under chronic treatment with APAP. Few clinical studies investigated the effect of chronic treatment with APAP combined with exercise, in nutritional conditions that probably did not affect Cys and GSH homeostasis. Whether APAP can aggravate sarcopenia in older individuals with low protein intake remains to be tested. If true, nutritional strategies based on enhancing Cys supply could be of prime interest to cut down the pro-sarcopenic effect of chronic treatment with APAP.

Pain management in critically ill patients: a review of multimodal treatment options

Pain management for critically ill patients provides physicians with the challenge of maximizing patient comfort while avoiding the risks that arise with oversedation. Preventing oversedation has become increasingly important as we better understand the negative impact it has on patients' experiences and outcomes. Current research suggests that oversedation can result in complications such as thromboembolism, pulmonary compromise, immunosuppression and delirium. Fortunately, the analgesic options available for physicians to limit these complications are growing as more treatment modalities are being researched and implemented in the intensive care unit. Our goal is to outline some of the effective and widely utilized tools available to physicians to appropriately and safely manage pain while avoiding oversedation in the critically ill population.

A short, intensive cognitive behavioral pain management program reduces health-care use in patients with chronic low back pain: two-year follow-up results of a prospective cohort

PURPOSE

Cognitive behavioral interventions are recommended as non-invasive treatment options for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, most treatment effects are small and short-lived. Although a 2-week intensive pain management program for patients with CLBP seems to be effective, the long-term results are not known. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the stability of the 2-year follow-up results and whether this is reflected in the use of health-care services.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed. Pre-treatment characteristics of patients and data of outcomes obtained at 1-year follow-up were used. At 2-year follow-up a structured interview was conducted following the principles of a post-marketing survey. Outcomes included daily functioning, quality of life, current intensity of pain, disturbance of pain during daily activities, and indicators of the use of pain medication and health-care services.

RESULTS

Of the 90 eligible patients 85 (94%) participated in the post-marketing survey. The 1-year clinical relevant effects are maintained at 2-year follow-up. Effect sizes for functioning and quality of life were large. More than 65% reached preset minimal clinically important differences. At pre-treatment all patients consulted their general practitioner (GP) and medical specialist (MS). At 2-year follow-up 73% reported having consulted neither a GP nor an MS during the previous year. Most of the patients indicated not to use any pain medication (57%) and the percentage patients using opioids have decreased (14%). Moreover, 81% reported to be at work.

CONCLUSIONS

The gained results from selected and motivated patients with longstanding CLBP at 1-year follow-up are stable at 2-year follow-up. Above all, most of the participants are at work and results indicate that the use of both pain medication and health care have decreased substantially.

A risk-benefit assessment of paracetamol (acetaminophen) combined with caffeine

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk: benefit of paracetamol combined with caffeine in the short-term management of acute pain conditions.

DESIGN

Database searches were conducted to identify double-blind trials comparing paracetamol/caffeine with paracetamol alone (benefit analysis) and any data pertaining to hepatotoxicity of paracetamol when combined with caffeine (risk analysis).

INTERVENTIONS

Paracetamol/caffeine (1,000 mg/130 mg) vs paracetamol (1,000 mg) alone.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Assessment of benefit has been derived by meta-analysis. Information on the pain condition and number of patients studied, dosing regimen, study design and analgesic outcome measures (total pain relief scores) was extracted and dichotomous outcomes were obtained by calculating the number of patients in each treatment group who achieved at least 50% of the maximum total pain relief score. Assessment of risk has been made by appraisal of the literature.

RESULTS

Eight studies from four papers provided sufficient quantitative data for satisfactory meta-analysis. The relative benefit (of achieving at least 50% pain relief) of paracetamol/caffeine vs paracetamol alone was 1.12 (95% Confidence Interval 1.05-1.19) across a number of acute pain states (dysmenorrhoea, headache, post-partum pain, and dental pain). Review of the effects of the combination of paracetamol and caffeine on the liver revealed no compelling data to suggest a clinically meaningful increase in hepatotoxicity with use of paracetamol/caffeine combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Paracetamol/caffeine (1,000 mg/130 mg) is effective and safe for use in acute management of pain. The hepatotoxicity of overdoses of paracetamol results from its oxidative metabolism, caffeine does not produce any increase in oxidative metabolism of therapeutic concentrations of paracetamol.

The effect of cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors on bone mineral density: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study

INTRODUCTION

The use of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors has been demonstrated to not only impair load-induced bone formation but also prevent menopause-associated bone loss. We hypothesized that COX-2 inhibitor use would be associated with increased bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women not using estrogen therapy and, conversely, with decreased BMD in men.

METHODS

The Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study is a longitudinal, randomly selected, population-based community cohort. We present data from men (n=2,004) and postmenopausal women age 65 and older (n=2,776) who underwent a BMD measurement and structured interview in the 5th year of the study. The outcome measure was percent difference in BMD (g/cm(2)).

RESULTS

Daily COX-2 inhibitor use was reported by 394 subjects. In men, daily use of COX-2 inhibitors was associated with a lower BMD at all hip sites, with a percent difference of -3.1% [95% confidence interval (CI), -6.0, -0.3] between users and nonusers at total hip. In postmenopausal women not using estrogen replacement therapy, daily COX-2 inhibitor use was associated with higher BMD at most sites [percent difference at total hip: +3.0% (95% CI, 0.3, 5.8)]. These effects appeared to be dose-dependent.

CONCLUSION

COX-2 inhibitor use was associated with a lower BMD in men and, on the other hand, with a higher BMD in postmenopausal women not using estrogen replacement therapy. Men who have used COX-2 inhibitors may wish to seek BMD measurement to assess their fracture risk. However, COX-2 inhibitors may have utility in postmenopausal women if bone-selective analogs can be developed.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of etoricoxib in the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy

This 2-part, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of etoricoxib, a COX-2 selective inhibitor, for the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy. In part 1 (6 weeks), 102 patients (> or = 12 years old) with hemophilic arthropathy were randomized to receive 90 mg etoricoxib once daily or placebo (1:1 ratio). In part 2 (6 months), 51 patients taking placebo in part 1 were randomized to receive 90 mg etoricoxib or 25 mg rofecoxib once daily; patients taking etoricoxib in part 1 continued the same treatment. Efficacy end points included Patient Assessment of Arthropathy Pain, Patient Global Assessment of Arthropathy Disease Status, and Investigator Global Assessment of Arthropathy Disease Status. Safety was evaluated at each study visit. Etoricoxib provided significant improvement in all end points versus placebo (P < .001). Fewer patients taking etoricoxib discontinued due to a lack of efficacy versus placebo (P = .048). During part 2, efficacy was maintained; etoricoxib and rofecoxib demonstrated similar results. The most common adverse experiences were upper respiratory infection and headache. The incidence of joint bleeding during part 1 was similar between etoricoxib (66.7%) and placebo (72.6%) and during part 2 between etoricoxib (77.0%) and rofecoxib (78.9%). We conclude that etoricoxib provided superior efficacy versus placebo for the treatment of hemophilic arthropathy and was generally safe and well tolerated.