Vascular effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs

Pain management considerations in patients living with both pain syndromes and cardiovascular diseases and disorders

Concomitant pain syndromes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and disorders are associated with significant morbidity, impaired quality of life, and neuropsychiatric disorders. There is an interplay between the mechanisms of pathophysiology of both CVD and pain syndromes. Patients with CVD (and/or disorders) as well as pain syndromes have an increased propensity for drug-drug/disease interactions. Therefore, an understanding of how to use pharmacotherapy to treat pain syndromes, in the context of patients who have diagnoses of CVD and/or disorders, is paramount to patients' success in achieving adequate pain control and appropriately managing CVD and/or disorders, all while decreasing the risk of adverse events (AEs) both from pharmacotherapy to treat pain and CVD (and/or disorders). Based on the appraisal of literature and authors' clinical expertise, it was determined that gabapentinoids, opioids, skeletal muscle relaxants, tricyclic antidepressants, clonidine, serotonin norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitors, dronabinol, carbamazepine, second-generation antipsychotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, corticosteroids, and topical anesthetics have the most evidence for use in patients with CVD and/or disorders. However, the literature surrounding the use of pharmacotherapy for pain management is limited to retrospective studies and there is a lack of well-designed, prospective, randomized trials; this also includes head-to-head comparator studies. Unlike many CVD-related pharmacotherapy studies, data studying pain management in patients with CVD lacks standardized outcomes that are consistent among the pool of data. Overall, the decision to prescribe specific pain management therapies in patients with CVD and/or disorders should include assessment of pain severity, type of pain, drug-drug/disease interactions, adjuvant therapies required, and the risk or presence of AEs.

Impact of Artificial Infiltration on the Removal of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs during Treatment of Surface Water

The content of pharmaceuticals in natural waters is steadily increasing. Especially nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often detected in natural waters due to their widespread use. This group of compounds includes commonly used representatives, such as paracetamol and ketoprofen. The quality of natural waters determines the processes applied for the treatment of drinking water. The methods used in order to remove pharmaceuticals from treated water include adsorption and biologically active filtration. Both processes also occur during artificial infiltration (forced flow of intake surface water through the ground to the collecting wells) at surface water intakes. The processes, which occur in the soil, change the water quality characteristics to a great extent. The goal of the study was to evaluate the removal efficiency of paracetamol and ketoprofen in the process of artificial infiltration used as a pre-treatment of surface water. The studies were conducted at a field experimental installation located at the technical artificial infiltration intake. The experimental installation consisted of three metering wells (piezometers) which were located on the way between the bank of the infiltration pond and the collecting well. The collected water samples allowed to evaluate the change of selected NSAIDs concentrations during the passage of water through the ground. The analysis procedure included solid phase extraction (SPE) and high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Removal of the studied NSAIDs in the infiltration process occurred with variable effectiveness throughout the year. Paracetamol was removed with annual efficiency equal to 42%, although no significant removal of ketoprofen was observed.

Assessment of subclinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

Objective:

The aim of the present study was to compare patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with healthy controls with respect to subclinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD).

Methods:

A total of 44 patients with AS with no history of CVD, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and lipid-lowering drug use were compared with 40 age- and sex-matched healthy controls with respect to carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and pulse wave velocity (PWV), which are surrogate markers of subclinical atherosclerosis. Correlation analysis was also performed to examine the association between surrogate markers and disease activity with inflammation [Ankylosing spondylitis disease activity score with C-reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP)].

Results:

In addition to age and sex, both groups were comparable with respect to cigarette smoking, body mass index, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p=0.425, p=0.325, and p=0.103, respectively). The level of total cholesterol was significantly lower in patients with AS (p=0.002). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor use ratios in patients with AS were 79.5% and 65.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference between both groups regarding PWV and CIMT (p=0.788 and p=0.253, respectively). In patients with AS, there was a significant correlation between ASDAS-CRP and CIMT (r=0.315, p=0.038), but the correlation between ASDAS-CRP and PWV was not significant (r=−0.183, p=0.234).

Conclusion:

The results of the present study could not provide sufficient evidence whether disease activity with inflammation caused subclinical atherosclerotic CVD in patients with AS without overt CVD. The increased atherosclerotic CVD risk is most probably multifactorial in patients with AS, but the extent of the contribution of disease activity with inflammation to increased atherosclerosis is controversial.

Intramuscular diclofenac is a cause of Nicolau syndrome in obese women: An observational study of consecutive ten patients

Nicolau syndrome is a skin and underlying tissue necrosis resulting from vascular occlusion after various injections of certain drugs. Intramuscular injections are the most common cause but it may occur after other types of parenteral interventions. There are many medications reported as causative factors inducing Nicolau syndrome including penicillin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroids, local anesthetics, and several others. We present an observational study of diclofenac induced Nicolau syndrome.

Management of inflammatory rheumatic conditions in the elderly

The number of elderly people with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases is increasing. This heterogeneous and comorbid population is at particular risk of cardiovascular, neoplastic, infectious and iatrogenic complications. The development of biotherapies has paved the way for innovative therapeutic strategies, which are associated with toxicities. In this review, we have focused on the scientific and therapeutic changes impacting the management of elderly patients affected by RA, SpA or PsA. A multidimensional health assessment resulting in an integrated therapeutic strategy was identified as a major research direction for improving the management of elderly patients.

Comparative study of the effect of Thymus daenensis gel 5% and diclofenac in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Background: Osteoarthritis is a syndrome characterized by joint pain and reduced performance and efficien- cy in patient. Thymus daenensis has been used since old times for the treatment of bone and joint deformities and pain in traditional medicine.

Purpose: This study was conducted to examine traditional usages and pharmacological features of T. daen- ensis with respect to the effect of the plant in patients with osteoarthritis.

Methods: 120 patients with osteoarthritis were divided into 3 groups. Patients in each group were treated by 5% Thymus daenensis gel, 1% diclofenac gel, or placebo for 6 weeks, along with oral celecoxib capsules. Patients were assessed in different intervals, based on the VAS score for assessment of pain in the joint and different dimensions of WOMAC questionnaire.

Results: Pain level (P < 0.005), stiffness during the day (P < 0.05), morning stiffness (P < 0.05) and physi- cal performance (P < 0.05) were significantly different among the groups.

Conclusions: Thymus daenensis gel improves the symptoms in patients equal and without significant difference than diclofenac group. It can be argued that its use can produce a satisfactory effect on patients with osteoarthritis due to its low cost, easy access, the plant’s natively occurring in Iran.

Diclofenac but not celecoxib improves endothelial function in rheumatoid arthritis: A study in adjuvant-induced arthritis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We aimed at investigating the effect of celecoxib (COX-2 selective inhibitor) and diclofenac (non-selective COX inhibitor) on endothelial function, and at identifying the underlying mechanisms in adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA).

METHODS

At the first signs of AIA, diclofenac (5 mg/kg twice a day, i.p), celecoxib (3 mg/kg/day, i.p) or saline (Vehicle) was administered for 3 weeks. Endothelial function was studied in aortic rings relaxed with acetylcholine (Ach) with or without inhibitors of NOS, arginase, EDHF and superoxide anions (O₂^-°) production. Aortic expression of eNOS, Ser1177-phospho-eNOS, COX-2, arginase-2, p22^phox and p47^phox was evaluated by Western blotting analysis. Arthritis scores, blood pressure, glycaemia and serum ADMA levels were measured.

RESULTS

Diclofenac and celecoxib significantly reduced arthritis score to the same extent (p<0.05). As compared to vehicle-treated AIA, celecoxib did not change whereas diclofenac improved endothelial function (p<0.05) through increased EDHF production, decreased arginase activity and expression, decreased superoxide anions production and expression of p22^phox and p47^phox. Diclofenac but not celecoxib significantly enhanced blood pressure and serum ADMA levels. Glycaemia was unchanged by both treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study reveals that the effect of NSAIDs on endothelial function cannot be extrapolated from their impact on arthritis severity and suggest that changes in blood pressure and plasma ADMA levels may not be useful to predict CV risk of NSAIDs in RA.

Managing cardiovascular risk in patients with inflammatory arthritis: practical considerations

Patients with inflammatory arthritis, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, or ankylosing spondylitis, have higher rates of cardiovascular mortality. While the increased cardiovascular risk is only explained to some extent, a lot of research is currently conducted to improve our understanding of its pathogenesis, risk stratification, and optimal cardiovascular risk management. This review sought to report epidemiological data pertaining to the cardiovascular disease burden in patients with inflammatory arthritis, underlying mechanisms accounting for excessive cardiovascular risk, along with recommendations regarding risk assessment and management in this patient population.

Efficacy and short-term safety of topical Dwarf Elder (Sambucus ebulus L.) versus diclofenac for knee osteoarthritis: A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Sambucus ebulus L. (S. ebulus) has had long-standing application in Traditional Persian Medicine for joint pain and for a variety of bone and joint disorders. According to traditional use of S. ebulus and its relevant pharmacologic properties, this study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and short-term safety of topical use of S. ebulus in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventy nine patients with knee OA were randomly enrolled in 2 parallel arms of a pilot randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial. The patients were treated by topical S. ebulus gel or 1% diclofenac gel, three times a day, as much as a fingertip unit for 4 weeks. Patients were assessed prior to enrollment and, then, 2 and 4 weeks subsequent to the intervention, in terms of scores of visual analogue scale (VAS) for self-grading of their knee joint pain, and according to 3 different domains of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire. Any observed adverse effects were also scrutinized.

RESULTS

The mean values of WOMAC pain score, total WOMAC score and VAS score for pain of the S. ebulus group were significantly lower compared with the diclofenac group (P=0.004, P=0.04, and P<0.001, respectively). In addition, no serious adverse effect was reported.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study showed that topical treatment with S. ebulus gel can be recommended for alleviating symptoms of patients with knee OA. However, longer trials involving larger samples size, are needed for achieving a comprehensive understanding about the efficacy and safety of S. ebulus in knee OA.

Impairment of aspirin antiplatelet effects by non-opioid analgesic medication

Aspirin is the mainstay in prophylaxis of cardiovascular diseases. Impaired aspirin antiplatelet effects are associated with enhanced incidence of cardiovascular events. Comedication with non-opioid analgesic drugs has been described to interfere with aspirin, resulting in impaired aspirin antiplatelet effects. Additionally, non-opioid analgesic medication has been shown to enhance the risk of cardiovascular events and death. Pain is very frequent and many patients rely on analgesic drugs to control pain. Therefore effective analgesic options without increased risk of cardiovascular events are desirable. This review focuses on commonly used non-opioid analgesics, interactions with aspirin medication and impact on cardiovascular risk.

Cardiovascular events in ankylosing spondylitis: an updated meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. In the guidelines, ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is considered to have an equally high cardiovascular risk. The literature findings remain controversial. This study aims to assess the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke in AS patients.

METHODS

An updated meta-analysis with a new systematic literature review using PubMed was conducted up to January 2014. Incidence of MI or stroke was calculated by metaproportion.

RESULTS

In addition to the 11 previously included studies, six new studies assessed the occurrence of MI or stroke in AS patients. (1) MI. A total of 2131 MI were reported in AS patients (n = 27,532) over a mean follow-up of 15 years: incidence 5.3% (1.6%-11.0%), i.e., 0.36/100 pyrs. Seven studies revealed 17,410 MI [2.5% (95% CI: 1.8%-3.4%)] in the control group (n = 1,349,964). Meta-analysis of the seven longitudinal studies showed a significant increase in MI [OR = 1.60 (95% CI: 1.32-1.93)] in AS patients. (2) Stroke. In 11 longitudinal studies (n = 51,990), 1807 strokes were reported in AS patients over 17.6 years of follow-up: incidence 3.6% (1.5%-6.5%), i.e., 0.24/100 pyrs. Three studies reported 22,899 strokes in controls (n = 1,239,041), giving an incidence of 1.78% (1.75%-1.80%). A significant increase in stroke [OR = 1.50 (95% CI: 1.39-1.62)] in AS patients was found.

CONCLUSION

AS patients appear to have a higher risk of MI and stroke. Management of cardiovascular risk factors and control of systemic inflammation should be taken into account in AS to decrease this high cardiovascular risk.

Should non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs be used continuously in ankylosing spondylitis?

OBJECTIVE

The 2010 update of ASAS/EULAR recommendations for managing ankylosing spondylitis (AS) specify that continuous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment should be preferred in patients with persistently active, symptomatic disease. Here, our objective was to assess whether continuous NSAID therapy improves disease control and influences radiographic progression compared to on-demand therapy. We also assessed the safety profiles of both regimens.

METHODS

We performed a review by searching the PubMed and Embase databases using two MeSH term combinations to compare continuous and on-demand NSAID therapy in terms of disease control, radiographic progression, and safety.

RESULTS

The only study evaluating the impact of continuous NSAID therapy on disease control showed no significant difference with on-demand therapy. In four studies, continuous treatment was associated with slower radiographic progression, as assessed in three studies using the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (m-SASSS). Three studies compared the safety of continuous and on-demand celecoxib, two in osteoarthritis and one in AS, and found no significant differences regarding the usual side effects of Cox-2 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Several studies showed slower radiographic progression with continuous NSAID therapy in AS. No studies demonstrated superiority of continuous NSAID therapy regarding symptom control. Continuous NSAID therapy (at least with Cox-2 inhibitors) does not modify safety compared to on-demand therapy.