1
|
Al-Nokhatha SA, Maguire S, Corcoran L, Mac Eoin N, Conway R, Johnson C. Effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided versus Landmark-based Glucocorticoid Injection in the Treatment of First Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis. POCUS JOURNAL 2023; 8:230-236. [PMID: 38099173 PMCID: PMC10721301 DOI: 10.24908/pocus.v8i2.16594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Background: Osteoarthritis is a debilitating degenerative disease more pronounced in elderly affecting many joints. The first carpometacarpal joint (CMC1) is commonly affected. Pain is the major complaint, which can impact patient's daily activities. Intra-articular glucocorticoid injection can be considered if conservative measures fail and ultrasound guided injection might be superior to the traditional anatomic landmark-guided technique. Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark-based approach to intra-articular CMC1 injection using the Australian Canadian osteoarthritis hand index (AUSCAN). Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with symptomatic CMC1 osteoarthritis who failed conservative measures were enrolled. In this prospective observational cohort study, utilizing a convenience sample, intra-articular corticosteroid injection was administered either by ultrasound-guided technique or landmark-based approach. Pain, stiffness and function in 10-points scale at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks were collected and analyzed using descriptive analysis. Results: There were 33 patients enrolled. Mean age was 63 years, with females making up the majority of participants (n = 28, 84.8%). Mean duration of CMC1 pain was 10 months (SD=2.5) up to the point of receiving the injection. Ultrasound guided injection was performed in 60.6% (n=20), while 39.4% (n=13) had the landmark approach. Both groups achieved a statistically and clinically significant level of change in AUSCAN score at week 6 (P≤ 0.05) but with a recurrence of symptoms at week 12 (P ≤ 0.05). At both intervals the AUSCAN scores were better than baseline (P ≤ 0.05). There was no difference between the two groups regarding baseline pain VAS score (mean ultrasound group= 6.6 vs landmark group= 7.5; P = 0.18). No significant differences were identified between two groups in terms of changes from baseline to 6, 12 and between 6 to 12 weeks in pain, stiffness and hand function (P > 0.05). Conclusion: No difference was found between the ultrasound-guided and landmark-based approaches for CMC1 injection on pain score, stiffness, or function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamma Ahmad Al-Nokhatha
- Department of Rheumatology, St. James's HospitalDublinIreland
- Department of Rheumatology, Tawam HospitalAl AinUnited Arab Emirates
- College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE UniversityAl AinUnited Arab Emirates
| | - Sinead Maguire
- Department of Rheumatology, St. James's HospitalDublinIreland
| | - Luke Corcoran
- Department of Rheumatology, St. James's HospitalDublinIreland
| | - Neil Mac Eoin
- Department of Rheumatology, St. James's HospitalDublinIreland
| | - Richard Conway
- Department of Rheumatology, St. James's HospitalDublinIreland
| | - Ciaran Johnson
- Department of Radiology, St. James's HospitalDublinIreland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tsechelidis OB, Sabido-Sauri R, Aydin SZ. Enthesitis in Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis-To Inject or Not To Inject?: A Narrative Review. Clin Ther 2023; 45:852-859. [PMID: 37716837 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Enthesitis is a key manifestation of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) and is considered to be the tissue where the disease initiates. Enthesitis leads to pain and substantial limitations in patients with PsA. Treatment is key in achieving remission or minimal disease activity. Whether it is safe to apply injections to entheseal tissue is unknown. This narrative review aimed to summarize the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of entheseal corticosteroid (CS) injections. METHODS The published literature was searched through PubMed as well as identifying relevant articles from their citations, for articles on the anatomic location of the injection, tissue characteristics (eg, whether there is a tendon sheath), blind versus imaging-guided and entheseal versus perientheseal injections, and related studies in animals. Given that articles on SpA are limited, those on mechanical enthesopathies were also included. FINDINGS The literature on the efficacy and tolerability of entheseal CS injection in SpA and PsA are limited. In most articles on entheseal injection, the entheseal tissue has not actually been targeted. The decision of entheseal injection should be made on an individual basis, with consideration of the use of CS injection as the last treatment option following more conservative measures such as NSAIDs, physiotherapy, rest, and lifestyle modifications. Entheseal injection should be avoided in high-risk patients, such as those who have rupture at the enthesis. Diagnostic ultrasound is advised to ensure the presence of inflammation that can potentially benefit from corticosteroid injection, as well as the absence of rupture. In the authors' perspective, perientheseal injections should be tried before intraentheseal injections. Finally, ultrasound guidance for needle placement is strongly encouraged. IMPLICATIONS The literature on the efficacy and tolerability of entheseal CS injection in SpA and PsA is limited. With the lack of quality data, recommendations on entheseal corticosteroid injection remain expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ricardo Sabido-Sauri
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sibel Zehra Aydin
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Ottawa Faculty of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
ÇAPKIN E. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography in rheumatic diseases. Turk J Med Sci 2023; 53:1537-1551. [PMID: 38813491 PMCID: PMC10760546 DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
Ultrasonography is an imaging technique based on sound waves used for the evaluation of soft tissues. Sound waves have been used for a long time in nonmedical fields, including military defense systems, radar systems, and detection of icebergs. Technological advances resulted in new techniques becoming available for medical imaging, including ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography. Nowadays, the use of imaging has become a gold standard protocol in the diagnosis of many diseases, and recently developed diagnosis and therapy options provide more efficient treatment of rheumatic diseases. Thus, it has become possible to prevent structural damage and disability in patients with rheumatic disease. Musculoskeletal ultrasonography is becoming a preferred imaging technique for rheumatic diseases, as it has many advantages. Among its advantages are being inexpensive, being radiation-free, having a dynamic image capacity, helping to detect disease activity, and helping with early detection and diagnosis of structural damage. This review summarizes the use of ultrasonography in rheumatic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erhan ÇAPKIN
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Farabi Hospital, Trabzon,
Turkiye
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Silva FD, Zorzenoni F, da Silva LNM, Dos Reis Teixeira Neto A, Gonzalez MT, Filho AGO, Guimarães JB. Tendon injections - upper extremity. Skeletal Radiol 2023; 52:979-990. [PMID: 36050573 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-022-04174-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Imaging-guided tendon procedures aim to reduce pain and increase function by controlling inflammation and stimulating healing. Ultrasound is the preferable guiding modality due to its high resolution and real-time demonstration of the tendinous anatomy and needle positioning. The technique includes appropriate patient positioning, which varies depending on the targeted tendon, as well as sterile and proper draping. For most procedures, we prefer the "in-plane" approach, which demonstrates the entire needle as it advances through different tissue layers. Upper limb injections commonly use corticosteroids and anesthetics with different reported short- and long-term results depending on the tendon treated; better results are obtained in the treatment of tenosynovitis (sliding tendons such as trigger finger and De Quervain's tenosynovitis). Shoulder and elbow tendinopathies (anchor tendons) may also benefit from injections containing irritants or healing stimulants such as dextrose (prolotherapy) and platelet-rich plasma or by the stimulation of healing via tendon perforations (fenestration). The hyaluronic acid injection has also been used in the treatment of both tenosynovitis and tendinopathies. For tendons passing through osteofibrous tunnels, an additional release may be performed, and the techniques are discussed in this review. Therefore, this article provides practicing musculoskeletal radiologists and trainees with a comprehensive review of tendon injection musculoskeletal image-guided procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flávio Duarte Silva
- Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina E Saúde, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fernando Zorzenoni
- Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina E Saúde, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | - Marco Tulio Gonzalez
- Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Fleury Medicina E Saúde, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koppikar S, Diaz P, Kaeley GS, Eder L. Seeing is believing: Smart use of musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology practice. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101850. [PMID: 37481369 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
Musculoskeletal ultrasonography has become an increasingly valuable tool as a complement to the physical exam in rheumatology practice. Its point-of-care access, low cost, safety, portability, and reliability in trained hands, make this technique especially useful in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Growing evidence has demonstrated the value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in the detection of inflammatory and structural changes in patients with joint pain without obvious joint swelling, in differentiating various inflammatory diagnoses, in the monitoring of inflammatory arthritis, and interventional procedures. The potential role of ultrasound guiding treat-to-target strategies or tapering treatment in inflammatory arthritis requires further research. However, musculoskeletal ultrasound can also have pitfalls and limitations that a clinician should be aware of.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sahil Koppikar
- Division of Rheumatology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Pamela Diaz
- Departamento de Inmunologia Clinica y Reumatologia, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Gurjit S Kaeley
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Lihi Eder
- Division of Rheumatology, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maugars Y, Bard H, Latourte A, Senbel É, Flipo RM, Eymard F. Musculoskeletal corticosteroid injections: Recommendations of the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR). Joint Bone Spine 2023; 90:105515. [PMID: 36529421 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Musculoskeletal corticosteroid injections are widely performed, although the exact practice varies greatly due to advances in knowledge and techniques. This justifies updating and drawing up good practice recommendations. Using a consensus model formalized by the French National Authority for Health (HAS) and based on a literature review that resulted in a "white book", 13 recommendations were developed by a group of experts. These recommendations were then sent online to 48 specialists for evaluation, 27 of whom were rheumatologists and 15 of whom were general practitioners. These recommendations were also presented at the 34th annual meeting of the French Society for Rheumatology (SFR) (Paris, December 2021) at a symposium attended by a hundred or so rheumatologists, who voted on these recommendations in person. The results are presented as an overall score out of 10, a median out of 10 and as tertiles. The agreement was excellent for 10 of these 13 recommendations, with mean values of 8.5 to 9.1 out of 10, median values of 9 or 10 out of 10 and agreement of 91.7% to 97.9%, which corresponds to a consensus. The 3 other recommendations were broadly supported but were the subject of more debate. One relates to patient information (mean 7.3/10, median 8/10, upper tertile 72.9%) with discussion about the waiting period. Another related to the summary report (mean 8.4/10, median 9, upper tertile 91.7%) with discussions about its content and the need to specify the lot number of the injected product. The last one related to periprosthetic injections and the need to consult and get approval from a specialist (mean 8.0/10, median 8, upper tertile 83.3%) with mostly the general practitioners having reservations. In all, there is a very strong consensus among the musculoskeletal corticosteroid injection experts and specialists consulted, which justifies them being taken into consideration to improve our daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yves Maugars
- Service de rhumatologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
| | | | | | | | | | - Florent Eymard
- Service de rhumatologie, CHU Henri-Mondor, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fukui S, Rokutanda R, Kawaai S, Suda M, Iwata F, Okada M, Kishimoto M. Current evidence and practical knowledge for ultrasound-guided procedures in rheumatology: Joint aspiration, injection, and other applications. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2023; 37:101832. [PMID: 37248141 DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2023.101832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound (US)-guided procedures have increasingly gained their role in the daily practice of rheumatology, owing to the growing evidence supporting their utility. The utilization of US guidance in procedures may enhance their accuracy, efficacy, and safety. This article presents a comprehensive review of the current evidence and practical knowledge pertaining to US-guided procedures in rheumatology, encompassing joint aspirations, injections, and other applications such as tendon sheath injections. We provide a detailed description of the US-guided procedure process and compare the in-plane and out-of-plane view methods, along with practical techniques based on existing evidence or our own expertise. For each joint, we summarize how to perform procedures with figures to facilitate a better understanding. Additionally, we introduce other applications of US-guided procedures for tendons, enthesis, bursae, and nerves as well as emerging therapies such as US-guided fascia hydrorelease. By utilizing these US techniques, rheumatologists can achieve the ability to manage a wider range of musculoskeletal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sho Fukui
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, MA, USA; Department of Emergency and General Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Ryo Rokutanda
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kameda Medical Center, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Kawaai
- Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masei Suda
- Department of Rheumatology, Suwa Central Hospital, Nagano, Japan
| | - Futoshi Iwata
- Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Okada
- Immuno-Rheumatology Center, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsumasa Kishimoto
- Department of Nephrology and Rheumatology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Naredo E, Rodriguez-Garcia SC, Terslev L, Martinoli C, Klauser A, Hartung W, Hammer HB, Cantisani V, Zaottini F, Vlad V, Uson J, Todorov P, Tesch C, Sudoł-Szopińska I, Simoni P, Serban O, Sconfienza LM, Sala-Blanch X, Plagou A, Picasso R, Özçakar L, Najm A, Möller I, Micu M, Mendoza-Cembranos D, Mandl P, Malattia C, Lenghel M, Kessler J, Iohom G, de la Fuente J, DʼAgostino MA, Collado P, Bueno A, Bong D, Alfageme F, Bilous D, Gutiu R, Marian A, Pelea M, Fodor D. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound - Part II: Joint Pathologies, Pediatric Applications, and Guided Procedures. ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN (STUTTGART, GERMANY : 1980) 2022; 43:252-273. [PMID: 34734404 DOI: 10.1055/a-1640-9183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The second part of the Guidelines and Recommendations for Musculoskeletal Ultrasound (MSUS), produced under the auspices of EFSUMB, following the same methodology as for Part 1, provides information and recommendations on the use of this imaging modality for joint pathology, pediatric applications, and musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided procedures. Clinical application, practical points, limitations, and artifacts are described and discussed for every joint or procedure. The document is intended to guide clinical users in their daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esperanza Naredo
- Department of Rheumatology, Bone and Joint Research Unit. Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, IIS Fundación Jiménez Díaz, and Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Lene Terslev
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Carlo Martinoli
- Department of Health Science - DISSAL, University of Genova, Italy
- UO Radiologia, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Andrea Klauser
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Section Head Rheumatology and Sports Imaging, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Hartung
- Clinic for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Asklepios Clinic, Bad Abbach, Germany
| | - Hilde B Hammer
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vito Cantisani
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Federico Zaottini
- Department of Health Science - DISSAL, University of Genova, Italy
- UO Radiologia, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Violeta Vlad
- Sf. Maria Hospital, Rheumatology Department, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Jacqueline Uson
- Department of Rheumatology Hospital Universitario Móstoles, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Plamen Todorov
- Department of Internal Disease Propaedeutic and Clinical Rheumatology, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | | | - Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska
- Department of Radiology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paolo Simoni
- Paediatric Imaging Department, "Reine Fabiola" Children's University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Oana Serban
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Xavier Sala-Blanch
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Clinic, Department of Human Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Athena Plagou
- Ultrasound Unit, Private Radiological Institution, Athens, Greece
| | - Riccardo Picasso
- Department of Health Science - DISSAL, University of Genova, Italy
- UO Radiologia, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Levent Özçakar
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aurelie Najm
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Ingrid Möller
- Instituto Poal de Reumatologia Barcelona, EULAR Working Group Anatomy for the Image, University of Barcelona, International University of Catalunya, Spain
| | - Mihaela Micu
- Rheumatology Division, 2nd Rehabilitation Department, Rehabilitation Clinical Hospital Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Peter Mandl
- Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Clara Malattia
- UOC Clinica Pediatrica e Reumatologia, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetic and Maternal Infantile Sciences (DINOGMI) University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Manuela Lenghel
- Radiology Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Jens Kessler
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gabriella Iohom
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cork University Hospital and University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | | | - Maria Antonietta DʼAgostino
- Istituto di Reumatologia Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, UOC Reumatologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paz Collado
- Rheumatology Department, Transitional Care Clinic, Hospital Universitario Severo Ochoa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angel Bueno
- Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Bong
- Instituto Poal de Reumatologia Barcelona, EULAR Working Group Anatomy for the Image, University of Barcelona, International University of Catalunya, Spain
| | - Fernando Alfageme
- Dermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Diana Bilous
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Roxana Gutiu
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Anamaria Marian
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Michael Pelea
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Daniela Fodor
- 2nd Internal Medicine Department, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ultrasound Effectiveness of Steroid Injection for hand Psoriatic Dactylitis: Results from a Longitudinal Observational Study. Rheumatol Ther 2021; 8:1809-1826. [PMID: 34652687 PMCID: PMC8572270 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-021-00383-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction To assess clinical and ultrasound effectiveness of steroid injection (local treatment, LT) into the digital flexor tendon sheath for the treatment of psoriatic dactylitis compared to systemic treatment (ST) alone. Methods In this observational, multicentre, prospective study, 88 cases of symptomatic hand dactylitis were evaluated clinically and sonographically by high-frequency ultrasound (US) probe in both greyscale (GS) and power Doppler (PD). The presence of flexor tenosynovitis (FT), soft tissue oedema (STO), peritendon extensor inflammation and synovitis was assessed (including DACtylitis glObal Sonographic—DACTOS—score) before treatment, at 1-month (T1) and 3-months (T3) follow-up. LT was proposed to all patients. Patients refusing LT were treated with oral NSAIDs. Patients continued the same baseline csDMARDs and/or corticosteroid therapy during the whole follow-up period. US response was defined for DACTOS score < 3 and US remission for DACTOS score = 0. Results At T3 evaluation the ST group showed a significantly higher persistence (grade > 1) of FT and STO (p < 0.001 for all) and MCP synovitis (p = 0.001). US remission was achieved only in the LT group (at T3 31% vs. 0, p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with DACTOS < 3 was significantly greater in the LT group compared with ST group, at both T1 (49% vs. 5%, p < 0.001) and T3 evaluation (76% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). In multiple conditional logistic regression analysis, the only factor associated with US remission was LT (T3 odds ratio = 41.21, p < 0.001). Conclusions US confirmed the effectiveness of steroid injection for dactylitis by demonstrating that it involves the resolution of extra-articular inflammation, in particular FT and STO.
Collapse
|
10
|
Dhir V, Mishra D, Samanta J. Glucocorticoids in spondyloarthritis-systematic review and real-world analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 60:4463-4475. [PMID: 33748829 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to identify and summarize the efficacy and safety of systemic glucocorticoids (GCs) and local injections of GC in SpA. METHODS PubMed (Medline) and EMBASE were searched with pre-defined keywords for relevant articles in English reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized interventional studies and non-randomized observational studies of the efficacy of GC in SpA, with five or more patients, for inclusion in a systematic literature review. Local injections of GC included IA and entheseal injections, but excluded SI joint injections. RESULTS Out of 9657 records identified, there were 14 studies on the use of systemic GCs in SpA (364 patients), including two RCTs of oral prednisolone. On pooling data from two placebo-controlled RCTs (≤24 weeks), BASDAI 50 was 4.2 times more likely (95% CI: 1.5, 11.5) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Assessment Group (ASAS) 20 was twice more likely (95% CI: 1.1, 3.64) to occur in patients on high-dose oral prednisolone (± taper). Pulsed GCs led to dramatic improvements that lasted a few weeks to a few months. There were no deaths or major adverse events. There were 10 studies (560 patients) on local GCs in SpA. IA injection was effective in achieving a sustained response in 51.5-90% of joints at 6 months. Entheseal injections led to reduced pain and improved US parameters. CONCLUSION There were limited studies on either systemic or local injections of GCs in SpA. However, there was good evidence of efficacy with the use of high-dose systemic GCs in the short term (≤6 months) in SpA. Both IA and entheseal injections seemed safe and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varun Dhir
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Debasish Mishra
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Joydeep Samanta
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Carriero A, Lubrano E, Picerno V, Padula AA, D'Angelo S. Corticosteroid injection treatment for dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2021; 13:1759720X211041864. [PMID: 34471429 PMCID: PMC8404638 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x211041864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Dactylitis – a hallmark clinical feature of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) – that occurs in 30–50% of PsA patients, is a marker of disease severity for PsA progression, an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and impairs the motor functions of PsA patients. There is a paucity of evidence for the treatment due to the absence of randomized controlled trials assessing dactylitis as a primary endpoint and current practice arises from the analysis of dactylitis as a secondary outcome. Corticosteroid (CS) injections for dactylitis in PsA patients are a therapeutic treatment option for patients with isolated dactylitis or for patients with flares in tendon sheaths, despite stable and effective systemic treatment. The aim of this narrative review is to briefly illustrate the clinical aspects of dactylitis in PsA, the imaging and clinimetric tools used to diagnose and monitor dactylitis, the current treatment strategies and principally to provide a comprehensive picture of the clinical efficacy and safety with ultrasound-guide and blind techniques of CS injections for dactylitis in PsA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Carriero
- Rheumatology Institute of Lucania (IReL), Rheumatology Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Via Petrone snc, 85100 Potenza (PZ), Italy
| | - Ennio Lubrano
- Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Valentina Picerno
- Rheumatology Institute of Lucania (IReL), Rheumatology Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Potenza, Italy
| | - Angela Anna Padula
- Rheumatology Institute of Lucania (IReL), Rheumatology Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Potenza, Italy
| | - Salvatore D'Angelo
- Rheumatology Institute of Lucania (IReL), Rheumatology Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Potenza, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cipolletta E, Filippucci E, Incorvaia A, Schettino M, Smerilli G, Di Battista J, Tesei G, Cosatti MA, Di Donato E, Tardella M, Di Matteo A, Di Carlo M, Grassi W. Ultrasound-Guided Procedures in Rheumatology Daily Practice: Feasibility, Accuracy, and Safety Issues. J Clin Rheumatol 2021; 27:226-231. [PMID: 32000229 DOI: 10.1097/rhu.0000000000001298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE The aims of this study were to describe in detail the ultrasound (US)-guided procedures in our daily rheumatology practice, to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of US-guided procedures, and to test the efficacy of our disinfection protocol in preventing infectious complications. METHODS This was a cross-sectional and monocentric study. Information regarding patients' age, sex, body mass index, rheumatic disease, US pathological findings, aspirated and/or injected anatomical site, US equipment (ie, probe type and frequency), and needle type was consecutively collected for each US-guided procedure in a third-level rheumatology center. RESULTS A total of 643 US-guided procedures were performed, with a mean of 5.2 procedures per working-day. In 94.2% of the patients, only one procedure was carried out, whereas in 5.8%, more than one. The mean time was 7 ± 2.5 minutes. Ultrasound-guided procedures were highly accurate (accuracy rate higher than 95%) and safe (adverse events were reported in 0.8%). Our disinfection protocol was effective in preventing infectious complications. Probes with frequency values between 8 to 13 MHz and 20-, 21-, and 22-gauge needles were the most frequently used at shoulder, knee, wrist, elbow, and ankle level. High-frequency linear probes (ranging between 18 and 22 MHz) and 23- and 25-gauge needles were used for injecting small joints of the hands and feet. Convex low-frequency probe (2-7 MHz) and 18- and 20-gauge needles were the most used for performing hip joint aspirations and/or injections. CONCLUSIONS This study reports useful information for setting up a service providing US-guided procedures in rheumatology and supports the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of US-guided procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Cipolletta
- From the Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital Jesi, Ancona
| | - Emilio Filippucci
- From the Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital Jesi, Ancona
| | - Antonella Incorvaia
- From the Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital Jesi, Ancona
| | - Martina Schettino
- From the Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital Jesi, Ancona
| | - Gianluca Smerilli
- From the Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital Jesi, Ancona
| | - Jacopo Di Battista
- From the Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital Jesi, Ancona
| | - Giulia Tesei
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Micaela Ana Cosatti
- Rheumatology and Immunology Unit, Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas Norberto Quirno, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Eleonora Di Donato
- From the Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital Jesi, Ancona
| | - Marika Tardella
- From the Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital Jesi, Ancona
| | | | - Marco Di Carlo
- From the Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital Jesi, Ancona
| | - Walter Grassi
- From the Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, "Carlo Urbani" Hospital Jesi, Ancona
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of tendinous foot involvement in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2021; 40:4889-4897. [PMID: 34228223 PMCID: PMC8599255 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-021-05848-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 06/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Introduction
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis frequently consult for pain resulting from involvement of the tendons of the foot. This pain negatively affects foot biomechanics and quality of life. The most widely used treatment option for this condition is ultrasound-guided steroid injection, while other treatments were recommended such as heel pad, splints, and footwear. Objective To evaluate a joint intervention (rheumatology and podiatry) comprising an orthotic-podiatric treatment and infiltrations. We evaluated the response using ultrasound monitoring, a pain scale, functional tests, and assessment of patient satisfaction. Methods We performed a non-controlled blinded prospective interventional study of 96 patients with foot pain and selected those with ultrasound-confirmed tendon involvement. Patients enrolled started intervention treatment and were followed for 6 months. The outcome of the intervention was compared with the patient’s baseline status. The pre-post differences in the secondary variables (pain, disability) were analyzed using the t test and contingency tables or the Mann–Whitney test. Results Using our protocol, we recorded a rapid and significant reduction in the intensity of pain, in the foot function index, and in the ultrasound parameters (grayscale and Doppler). Structural damage to the tendon improved more slowly, with significant outcomes only at the last visit with respect to baseline. Abnormal foot support was detected in 50% of patients, and 79.5% were using inappropriate footwear. Conclusions Our multidisciplinary therapeutic protocol enabled a very significant improvement in tendon involvement. It was well-tolerated, with a high degree of satisfaction, and was easily evaluated using ultrasound. No changes in background medication were necessary.Key Points • Multidisciplinary evaluation of patients with RA is advisable because it improves the treatment management in cases of inflammatory activity and structural abnormalities of the foot. • Comprising orthopedic-podiatric treatment (heel, splints, and suitable footwear) and infiltrations, in terms of clinical, ultrasound, and functional recovery of the foot tendons. • The therapy protocol we propose led to a significant improvement in pain relief and functional recovery. |
Collapse
|
14
|
A Systematic Review of the Efficacy of Corticosteroid Injections of Tendon Sheaths, Excluding Stenosing Tenosynovitis of the Wrist and Hand. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 100:683-688. [PMID: 33017344 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000001609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Corticosteroid injections into tendon sheaths are common in clinical practice for treatment of a variety of tendon disorders. Previous systematic reviews have been performed on injections for stenosing tenosynovitis (DeQuervain tenosynovitis and trigger finger), but little high-level evidence remains for other tendon sheath injections. This systematic review analyzes the available literature on improvements in pain and function after these injections. DESIGN This systematic review of MEDLINE and Embase databases, as well as article bibliographies, examined studies of adult tendon sheath injections, excluding DeQuervain and trigger finger injections. Studies with and without comparison groups were examined. Risk of bias assessment was additionally performed. RESULTS Abstracts from 1293 records were screened, and 187 full-text articles were reviewed. Seven articles met final inclusion criteria, of which five were prospective trials and none were compared with a placebo. The proximal biceps, peroneal, finger flexor, and posterior tibialis tendons were explicitly examined. All articles reported at least short-term improvements in pain, and some reported improvement in function. CONCLUSIONS Low-quality studies exist that suggest tendon sheath injections may provide at least short-term improvement in pain. Controlled studies are required to fully demonstrate efficacy.
Collapse
|
15
|
Psoriatic Dactylitis: Current Perspectives and New Insights in Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10122604. [PMID: 34204773 PMCID: PMC8231617 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10122604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Dactylitis, one of the most typical features of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), is the diffuse swelling of the digits and is determined by the involvement of different anatomic structures, including: the subcutaneous fibrous tissue “accessory pulley” system; flexor tendons, with their related structures; the articular synovium; the small enthesis of the hands. Dactylitis is currently considered both a marker of disease activity and severe prognosis and its importance in PsA is emphasized by the inclusion in the classification criteria of PsA. This review focuses on the role of imaging in the management of PsA patients with dactylitis in clinical practice and in a research setting. Furthermore, imaging could be a valuable tool to assist in unravelling some of the underlying mechanisms of the onset and chronicization of dactylitis in PsA patients.
Collapse
|
16
|
Recommendations for the pragmatic use of ultrasound in rheumatoid arthritis by the GEISPER French group. Joint Bone Spine 2021; 88:105187. [PMID: 33892194 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop recommendations for the appropriate use of ultrasound in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in routine practice based on data from the literature and of experts opinion. METHODS Based on a systematic literature review, a scientific committee decided on themes and relevant questions to draw up an initial draft of recommendations. These recommendations were submitted to a group of experts in ultrasound in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases using a Delphi method, which produced preliminary recommendations. These were submitted to an expanded group of ultrasound experts for relevance, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness. The level of agreement of the experts were recorded during a face-to-face meeting. RESULTS Following two rounds of the Delphi, a consensus was reached on three overarching principles, including definitions of joints, tendons and articular sites to be examined, and 10 recommendations. These recommendations underline the benefit of ultrasound for the diagnosis of RA in cases of inflammatory arthralgia or undifferentiated arthritis as well as in assessing the extent of initial structural and inflammatory damage. They also define the role of ultrasound during follow-up or when considering treatment reduction once clinical remission has been achieved. Lastly, they illustrate the utility of ultrasound in facilitating technical procedures. CONCLUSION These 10 consensus-based recommendations should harmonize and optimize clinical practice and thus improve the management of RA patients.
Collapse
|
17
|
Hynes JP, Fhlatharta MN, Ryan JW, MacMahon PJ, Eustace SJ, Kavanagh EC. Complications in image-guided musculoskeletal injections. Skeletal Radiol 2021; 50:343-349. [PMID: 32734375 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03565-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To establish the incidence and define the nature of complications occurring following image-guided musculoskeletal injections at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients undergoing image-guided musculoskeletal injection during the study period (16/3/2016 to 24/01/2020) were included. Departmental records were reviewed to identify all patients describing possible complications following injection, what therapy was required (if any) and what the outcome was. No patients were excluded. Complications were classified as minor or major. Injections were categorised as follows: cervical spine, lumbar facet joint, lumbar nerve root, caudal epidural and 'other'. The complication rate for each individual category of procedure was compared with the combined complication rate for all other categories by constructing contingency tables and using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS A total of 8226 patients underwent image-guided musculoskeletal injections within the study period. Exactly 100 patients were identified as having reported a complication, producing an overall complication rate of 1.2%. One complication was categorised as 'major', with the patient requiring expedited surgery. The remainder (99 patients) were categorised as having experienced minor complications. The incidence of complications after 'other' injections was significantly greater than for other categories of injection (1.86%, p = 0.028). There was no significant difference in the complication rate for cervical spine (0.93%, p = 0.257), lumbar nerve root (0.85%, p = 0.401), lumbar facet joint (0.67%, p = 0.326) or caudal epidural (1.29%, p = 0.687) injections. 'Other' injections were subsequently further sub-categorised by anatomical site and imaging modality used. Glenohumeral (2.97%, p = 0.0361) and sacro-iliac (3.51%, p = 0.0498) joint injections were associated with a significantly increased risk of complications. There was no difference in the incidence of complications with fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance. CONCLUSION In conclusion, image-guided musculoskeletal injections are safe and well-tolerated procedures. Complications are rare, occurring in just 1.2% of patients. 99% of complications are minor, either not requiring intervention or resolving with simple supportive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John P Hynes
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
| | | | - James W Ryan
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Peter J MacMahon
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.,Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Stephen J Eustace
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.,Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| | - Eoin C Kavanagh
- Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.,Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Republic of Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mortada M, Amer YA, Zaghlol RS. Efficacy and Safety of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Guided Aspiration and Intra-Lesional Corticosteroids Injection of Ruptured Baker's Cyst: A Retrospective Observational Study. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS 2020; 13:1179544120967383. [PMID: 33223862 PMCID: PMC7658507 DOI: 10.1177/1179544120967383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2019] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the work was to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of ultrasonographic guided aspiration performed with corticosteroid injection intra-lesional for ruptured Baker cysts (BCs). Methods: Single-center retrospective study that included 42 patients with knee joint disorder associated with ruptured BCs were treated by ultrasonographic guided aspiration of fluid from the cyst and different points from the calf then intra-lesional injection of corticosteroids once or twice, 1 week apart. Follow up were done weekly until complete resolution of symptoms. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Rauschning-Lindgren and Lysholm Knee Scoring Scales (RLC) were used for assessment. Results: Clinical parameters (VAS and RLC) improved significantly in all patients at both post injection evaluation visits (1 week and 12 weeks). Ultrasonographic features improved significantly with complete disappearance of free fluid in the calf in 35 (83.3%) cases 1 week after the injection, and in 41 (97.6%) after 12 weeks. As regards BCs only 4 (9.5%) cases showed complete disappearance after 1 week and there was recurrent BCs in 38 (90.5%) cases which required reaspiration. While after 12 weeks, BCs were completely disappeared in 23 (54.8%) cases, most of the relapsed BCs were complex BCs. No side effects were reported in all cases. Conclusion: Ultrasonographic guided aspiration followed by injection of corticosteroids intra-lesional is an efficient and safe method for managing ruptured BCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Mortada
- Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Yomna A Amer
- Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Rabab S Zaghlol
- Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.,Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Security Forces Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Di Matteo A, Mankia K, Azukizawa M, Wakefield RJ. The Role of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in the Rheumatoid Arthritis Continuum. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2020; 22:41. [PMID: 32562012 PMCID: PMC7305070 DOI: 10.1007/s11926-020-00911-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is no longer considered a fixed phenotype but rather a disease continuum. This review outlines the current and potential value of applying ultrasound (US) along this continuum: from the prediction of progression to RA in at-risk individuals, to confirmation of the early diagnosis of RA, as well as the consideration of differential diagnoses, and the use in disease monitoring and defining remission. RECENT FINDINGS In individuals at-risk of RA (i.e., positive autoantibodies with symptoms but without synovitis), US has shown a promising predictive value for the development of clinical arthritis, providing the opportunity to improve risk stratification (and disease prevention) of these individuals. The detection of inflammation on US in patients with early undifferentiated arthritis, in which a definite diagnosis cannot be reached, could predict evolution to persistent arthritis, mostly RA. This, in addition to the US potential ability to identify disease specific patterns for different rheumatic conditions, might facilitate early diagnosis and, therefore, improve the management of patients with RA, or other types of inflammatory arthritides. US has also demonstrated the capability to predict radiographic progression, and relapse risk after treatment discontinuation, in RA patients in remission according to the clinical instruments, raising implications in the management, including therapy discontinuation, of these patients. US has an undeniable value in the management of patients at different stages along the RA continuum. Further research is needed to identify which groups of patients benefit the most from US imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Di Matteo
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Rheumatology Unit, Carlo Urbani Hospital, Jesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Kulveer Mankia
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Masayuki Azukizawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Himeji Medical Center, 68 Honmachi, Himeji, Hyogo, 670-8520, Japan
| | - Richard J Wakefield
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Girolimetto N, Macchioni P, Citriniti G, Tinazzi I, Bascherini V, Martinis F, Marchetta A, Possemato N, Tasso M, Peluso R, Punzi L, Salvarani C, Scarpa R, McGonagle D, Costa L, Caso F. Effectiveness of steroid injection for hand psoriatic dactylitis: results from a multicentre prospective observational study. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39:3383-3392. [PMID: 32418040 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05142-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of steroid injection (local treatment, LT) into the digital flexor tendon sheath of dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients as compared with systemic treatment (ST). METHODS Forty-six PsA patients with a total of 73 dactylitic fingers were assessed in an observational, multicentre, prospective study by the Leeds Dactylitis Index basic (LDI-b) score and evaluated for local pain (visual analogue scale-VAS pain) and functional impairment (VAS-FI). Steroid injection was proposed to all patients. Patients refusing LT were treated with oral NSAIDs. Both the groups continued baseline csDMARDs and/or corticosteroids therapy. The clinical outcomes were measured at baseline, 1 month (T1) and 3 months (T3). RESULTS The reduction of VAS-pain, VAS-FI and LDI-b values was statistically significant higher in the LT group (24 patients, 38 dactylitic fingers) as compared with the ST group (22 patients, 35 dactylitic fingers), both at T1 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) and at T3 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). A clinically meaningful treatment response (defined as a contemporary reduction of at least 5 points in VAS-pain and VAS-FI or as values of VAS-pain and VAS-FI were both ≤ 2) was observed at T1 in 33 (87%) digits in LT group and in 6 (17%) digits in ST group (p < 0.001). At T3, clinical response improved significantly in both the groups, with significant difference (94% vs 31%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS For the first time, we show the effectiveness of steroid injection into the digital flexor tendon sheath in improving clinical aspects of hand psoriatic dactylitis. Key Points • Therapy with steroid injection (local treatment, LT), into the digital flexor tendon sheath for the treatment of active dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis patients, is more effective when compared with systemic treatment (ST) alone. • The reduction of VAS-pain, VAS-functional impairment (VAS-FI) and Leeds Dactylitis Index basic values was statistically significant higher in the LT group as compared with the ST group, both at T1and at T3. • A clinically meaningful response was observed at T1 in 87% of digits of patients treated with steroid injection and in 17% of digits of the systemic treatment group (p < 0.001). At T3, clinical response improved significantly in both the groups, with significant difference. • For the first time, findings from this study show that the use of steroid injections into the digital flexor tendon sheath for psoriatic dactylitis could be an effective and safe first-line therapy for psoriatic dactylitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Girolimetto
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.,Department of Rheumatology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Macchioni
- Department of Rheumatology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giorgia Citriniti
- Department of Rheumatology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Ilaria Tinazzi
- Unit of Rheumatology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Vittoria Bascherini
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Federica Martinis
- Unit of Rheumatology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Marchetta
- Unit of Rheumatology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Possemato
- Department of Rheumatology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Marco Tasso
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Rosario Peluso
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Leonardo Punzi
- Centre for Gout and Metabolic Bone and Joint Diseases, Rheumatology, SS Giovanni and Paolo, Venice, Italy
| | - Carlo Salvarani
- Department of Rheumatology, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.,Rheumatology Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Raffaele Scarpa
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Dennis McGonagle
- NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust and the University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Luisa Costa
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Caso
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Interventional therapeutic procedures to treat degenerative and inflammatory musculoskeletal conditions: state of the art. Radiol Med 2019; 124:1112-1120. [PMID: 30828775 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-01018-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Imaging-guided interventional procedures have become increasingly popular in the treatment of several pathologic conditions in the musculoskeletal system. Besides oncological treatments, musculoskeletal procedures can be performed to treat different degenerative or inflammatory conditions. This paper is aimed to review clinical indications and technical aspects of these kinds of procedures. In particular, we revise the general aspects common to most procedures and the different imaging-guided interventions which can be performed around joints, soft tissues, and spine.
Collapse
|
22
|
Peters SE, Laxer RM, Connolly BL, Parra DA. Ultrasound-guided steroid tendon sheath injections in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a 10-year single-center retrospective study. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J 2017; 15:22. [PMID: 28399893 PMCID: PMC5387283 DOI: 10.1186/s12969-017-0155-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aims of this study were to: (a) Identify tendon sheaths most commonly treated with steroid injections in a pediatric patient population with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA); (b) Describe technical aspects of the procedure; (c) Characterize sonographic appearance of tenosynovitis in JIA; (d) Assess agreement between clinical request and sites injected. METHODS This was a 10 year single-center retrospective study (May 2006-April 2016) of patients with JIA referred by Rheumatology for ultrasound-guided tendon sheath injections. Patient demographics, clinical referral information, sonographic appearance of the tendon sheaths and technical aspects of the procedure were analyzed. RESULTS There were 308 procedures of 244 patients (75% female, mean age 9.6 years) who underwent a total of 926 tendon sheath injections. Ankle tendons were most commonly injected (84.9%), specifically the tendon sheaths of tibialis posterior (22.3%), peroneus longus (20%) and brevis (19.7%). The majority of treated sites (91.9%) showed peritendinous fluid and sheath thickening on ultrasound. There were 2 minor intra-procedure complications without sequelae. A good agreement between clinical request and sites injected was observed. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound-guided tendon sheath injections with steroids are used frequently to treat patients with JIA. It is a safe intervention with a high technical success rate. The ankle region, specifically the medial compartment, is the site most commonly injected in this group of patients. The most common sonographic finding is peritendinous fluid and sheath thickening. These findings might assist clinicians and radiologists to characterize and more effectively manage tenosynovitis in patients with JIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon E. Peters
- grid.7886.1School of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ronald M. Laxer
- grid.42327.30Division of Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics and Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Bairbre L. Connolly
- grid.42327.30Image Guided Therapy, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Dimitri A. Parra
- grid.42327.30Image Guided Therapy, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The Hospital for Sick Children and University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
|
24
|
Gutierrez M, Kaeley GS, Bertolazzi C, Pineda C. State of the art of ultrasound in the assessment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2016; 13:439-447. [DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2017.1262765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Marwin Gutierrez
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Rheumatic Disorders, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, México City, Mexico
| | - Gurjit S Kaeley
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Jacksonville, USA
| | - Chiara Bertolazzi
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Rheumatic Disorders, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, México City, Mexico
| | - Carlos Pineda
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Rheumatic Disorders, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, México City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ammitzbøll-Danielsen M, Østergaard M, Fana V, Glinatsi D, Døhn UM, Ørnbjerg LM, Naredo E, Terslev L. Intramuscular versus ultrasound-guided intratenosynovial glucocorticoid injection for tenosynovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis 2016; 76:666-672. [PMID: 27604532 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2016] [Revised: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of intramuscular versus ultrasound (US)-guided intratenosynovial glucocorticoid injection in providing disease control after 2, 4 and 12 weeks in patients with rheumatoid arthritis(RA) with tenosynovitis. METHODS Fifty patients with RA and tenosynovitis were randomised into two double-blind groups: (A) 'intramuscular group', receiving intramuscular injection of betamethasone and US-guided intratenosynovial isotonic saline injection and (B) 'intratenosynovial group' receiving saline intramuscularly and US-guided intratenosynovial betamethasone injection. All patients were in stable disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug treatment prior to and during the study. Patients were excluded, and considered non-responders, if any treatments were altered during the follow-up period. 'US tenosynovitis remission', defined as US tenosynovitis grey-scale score ≤1 and colour Doppler score=0, was assessed at week 4 (primary outcome), and weeks 2 and 12, using non-responder imputation for missing data. RESULTS US tenosynovitis remission at week 4 was achieved in 25% (6/24) in the 'intramuscular group' versus 64% (16/25) in the 'intratenosynovial group', that is, a difference of -39 percentage point (pp) (CI -65pp to -13pp), Fisher exact test p=0.001. Corresponding values for the 'intramuscular group' versus the 'intratenosynovial group' at 2 and 12 weeks were 21% (5/24) versus 48% (13/25), that is, a difference of -27pp (CI -53pp to -2pp), p=0.072 and 8% (2/24) versus 44% (11/25), that is, difference of -36pp (-58pp to -13pp), p=0.003. Most US, clinical and patient-reported scores improved more in the 'intratenosynovial group' at all follow-up visits. CONCLUSIONS In this randomised double-blind clinical trial, patients with RA and tenosynovitis responded significantly better to US-guided intratenosynovial glucocorticoid injection than to intramuscular glucocorticoid injection, both at 4 and 12 weeks follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER EudraCT nr: 2013-003486-34.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mads Ammitzbøll-Danielsen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Viktoria Fana
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Daniel Glinatsi
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Uffe Møller Døhn
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Lykke Midtbøll Ørnbjerg
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| | - Esperanza Naredo
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón and Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lene Terslev
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
CONTEXT Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) research is expanding due to increased clinical utility of sonography. STUDY DESIGN Clinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 4. RESULTS Ultrasound is widely applied in musculoskeletal imaging and sports medicine. The real-time capabilities and favorable cost profile of US make it ideal for use in diagnosis of musculoskeletal conditions. The enthusiasm for the use of US in musculoskeletal imaging has led to an increase in US research to broaden its applications. CONCLUSION Several recent advances have been made in conventional and novel US imaging techniques, quantitative US imaging, and US-guided interventions. STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATIONS TAXONOMY SORT C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Kenechi Nwawka
- Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|