Myocardial blood flow analysis of stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion for hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease diagnosis: The clinical value of relative parameter optimization

Myocardial perfusion imaging using computed tomography: Current status, clinical value and prognostic implications

Combined anatomical and functional evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) using computed tomography (CT) has recently emerged as an accurate, robust, and non-invasive tool for the evaluation of ischemic heart disease. Cardiac CT has become a one-stop-shop imaging modality that allows the simultaneous depiction, characterization, and quantification of coronary atherosclerosis and the assessment of myocardial ischemia. Advancements in scanner technology (improvements in spatial and temporal resolution, dual-energy imaging, wide detector panels) and the implementation of iterative reconstruction algorithms enables the detection of myocardial ischemia in both qualitative and quantitative fashion using low-dose scanning protocols. The addition of CT perfusion (CTP) to standard coronary CT angiography is a reliable tool to improve diagnostic accuracy. CTP using static first-pass imaging enables qualitative assessment of the myocardial tissue, whereas dynamic perfusion imaging can also provide quantitative information on myocardial blood flow. Myocardial tissue assessment by CTP holds the potential to refine risk in stable chest pain or microvascular dysfunction. CTP can aid the detection of residual ischemia after coronary intervention. Comprehensive evaluation of CAD using CTP might therefore improve the selection of patients for aggressive secondary prevention therapy or coronary revascularization with high diagnostic certainty. In addition, prognostic information provided by perfusion CT imaging could improve patient outcomes by quantifying the ischemic burden of the left ventricle. The current review focuses on the clinical value of myocardial perfusion imaging by CT, current status of CTP imaging and the use of myocardial CTP in various patient populations for the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease.

The Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography: 2020 Year in review

The purpose of this review is to highlight the most impactful, educational, and frequently downloaded articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (JCCT) for the year 2020. The JCCT reached new records in 2020 for the number of research submissions, published manuscripts, article downloads and social media impressions. The articles in this review were selected by the Editorial Board of the JCCT and are comprised predominately of original research publications in the following categories: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), coronary artery disease, coronary physiology, structural heart disease, and technical advances. The Editorial Board would like to thank each of the authors, peer-reviewers and the readers of JCCT for making 2020 one of the most successful years in its history, despite the challenging circumstances of the global COVID-19 pandemic.

Cardiac CT perfusion and FFRCTA: pathophysiological features in ischemic heart disease

Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) has rapidly evolved, becoming a powerful integrated tool for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD), and being superior to other noninvasive methods due to its high accuracy and ability to simultaneously assess both lumen stenosis and atherosclerotic plaque burden. Furthermore, CCT is regarded as an effective gatekeeper for coronary angiography, and carries independent important prognostic information. In the last decade, the introduction of new functional CCT applications, namely CCT perfusion (CCTP) imaging and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CTA), has opened the door for accurate assessment of the haemodynamic significance of stenoses. These new CCT technologies, thus, share the unique advantage of assessing both myocardial ischemia and patient-specific coronary artery anatomy, providing an integrated anatomical/functional analysis. In the present review, starting from the pathophysiology of myocardial ischemia, we evaluate the existing evidence for functional CCT imaging and its value in relation to alternative, well-established, non-invasive imaging modalities and invasive indices of ischemia (currently the gold-standard). The knowledge of clinical applications, benefits, and limitations of these new CCT technologies will allow efficient and optimal use in clinical practice in the near future.

Diagnostic performance of quantitative, semi-quantitative, and visual analysis of dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: a validation study with invasive fractional flow reserve

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic performance of absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF), MBF_ratio, and visual analysis of dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CT-MPI) for the detection of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with chest pain and intermediate-to-high pre-test probability of obstructive coronary artery disease were prospectively enrolled. All patients were referred for dynamic CT-MPI and fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurements within 4 weeks. Absolute MBF, MBF_ratio (mean MBF of stenosis-subtended territories versus that of reference territories), and visually identified perfusion defect were tested for the diagnostic performance with reference to FFR.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients with 95 target vessels were included for final analysis. The mean radiation dose for dynamic CT-MPI was 3.0 (2.2-4.0) mSv. The mean lesion-based absolute MBF value was significantly lower in ischemic segments than that in non-ischemic segments (78.0 (65.0-86.0) mL/min/100 mL vs. 133.0 (117.5-163.8) mL/min/100 mL, p < 0.001). Similarly, the lesion-based MBF_ratio was also markedly lower in territories with positive FFR results (0.52 (0.44-0.64) vs. 0.93 (0.91-0.97), p < 0.001). According to per-lesion ROC curve analysis, MBF and MBF_ratio had a similar area under the curve (AUC) for detecting hemodynamically significant lesions (AUC = 0.942 vs. 0.956, p = 0.413), which were larger than that of visual analysis (AUC = 0.802, both p < 0.01). The vessel-based sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 84.3%, 97.7%, and 90.5% for MBF and 96.1%, 93.2%, and 94.7% for MBF_ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Absolute MBF and MBF_ratio had similarly excellent diagnostic performance with reference to FFR. In addition, these two parameters outperformed visual analysis for the detection of myocardial ischemia.

KEY POINTS

• The mean MBF and MBF_ratio were significantly lower in ischemic segments than those in non-ischemic segments. • Absolute MBF and MBF_ratio had similar AUCs for the detection of hemodynamically significant lesions (AUC = 0.942 vs. 0.956, p = 0.413), which were larger than that of visual analysis (AUC = 0.802, both p < 0.01). • The vessel-based sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 84.3%, 97.7%, and 90.5% for absolute MBF and 96.1%, 93.2%, and 94.7% for MBF_ratio.